25
Senior Survey Data: Overview

Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05 135 responses; grad class 608; 22% response rate Second administration spring 06 264

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Senior Survey Data: Overview

Page 2: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

First administration fall 05 135 responses; grad class 608; 22% response rate

Second administration spring 06 264 responses; grad class 656 40% response rate

Two Rounds

Page 3: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Some Problems

Low response rate in fall Survey design

Left natural sciences out of core! Some clarity issues related to wording

and grouping

Page 4: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

The Questions

Section I. Satisfaction with educational experience.

Example: Indicate the extent to which Lamar University contributed to your growth in each of the following areas: each core area , major, vocational skills, computing skills.

Page 5: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

II. Satisfaction with University Services

How adequate were the following university services?

academic support technology to enhance student learning technology in classes technology training access to library resources instruction in library use healthy and safe environment

Page 6: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

III. Overall Satisfaction

Choose LU again? Overall satisfaction with your

education?

Page 7: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

IV. Optional: Satisfaction with Miscellaneous Aspects

Health center Food service Computer labs Campus police Student newspaper Post office Registration LU website Student financial aid Academic advisement New student orientation

Library services SGA Residence halls Career placement Student recreation Athletics Campus events/activities Student organizations Campus bookstore Setzer Center Baby Redbird childcare

Page 8: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

General Responses: Favorable

Strongest satisfaction (over 3.2 mean on 1-4 scale) Major field Core courses in written and oral communications Access to library resources; library services Overall satisfaction with LU Health Center Computer labs LU website

Page 9: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Weakest Areas (under 2.75)

Two areas in core curriculum Physical Activity (2.32) Philosophy of Knowledge (2.66)

Page 10: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Patterns Worth Noting

Satisfaction with campus support and campus services (3.06) was higher than mean for satisfaction with core academic areas (2.86)

Highest satisfaction overall was with Academic Majors: 3.66/3.67

Page 11: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Senior Survey Free Response Comments: Fall 05, Spring 06

Students were asked to identify the three things they most liked and disliked about their experience at Lamar.

Page 12: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Top Spring 06 Dislikes (591 total items)

Parking: 106 (17%) Professors/instructors: 50 (8%) Scheduling of classes/availability of

classes: 31 (5%) Poor quality of administrative services

to students : 25 (4%) Inadequate computer equipment/lab

hours: 24 (4%)

Page 13: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Top Fall 05 Dislikes (217 items total)

Parking: 50 (23%) Professors/instructors: 21 (9%) Setzer Center atmosphere: 14 (6%) Poor advising: 12 (5%) Scheduling of classes: 12 (5%)

Page 14: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Top Spring 06 Likes (623 items total)

Professors/teaching: 110 (18%) Small size, student/teacher ratio: 77

(12%) Classes/learning environment: 70

(11%) Close to home: 51 (8%) Classmates/peers: 50 (8%) Clean, small campus feel: 33 (5%)

Page 15: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Top Fall 05 Likes (244 items total)

Professors/teaching :71 (29%) Small size, student/teacher ratio: 28 (11%) Classes/learning environment: 25 (10%) Close to home: 23 (9%) Classmates/peers: 17 (6%) Activities/sports: 17 (6%) Technology availability: 17 (6%)

Page 16: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Free Response Conclusions:Dislikes

Parking is by far the biggest issue. Comments focus on: Distance from Montagne to classrooms Lack of covered walkways or shuttle Shortage of spaces in senior lot

(construction) Definition of “senior” for parking access

Page 17: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Free Response Conclusions:Likes

Instruction Faculty as people Low student/teacher ratio Learning environment

Page 18: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Observations

Cluster of comments concerning distance education and desire for more flexible class scheduling suggests that this is a direction we should pursue.

Financial aid complaints were low, did not break the 5% point—a definite improvement

Page 19: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Senior Survey: Satisfaction with Core Courses and Major F05, Sp 06

FALL 05 SPRING 06

2.96 2.893.1

2.4

3.67

2.25

2.62

3.27

2.792.86

3.26

3.66

2.72

3.29

2.82.732.75

3.14

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Page 20: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Senior survey: Overall satisfaction with LU F05 Sp06

3.153.23 3.133.20

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Page 21: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Senior Survey: Satisfaction with Library

3.44

2.77

3.233.44

2.93

3.26

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

F05 Sp 06

F05 Sp06

F05 Sp06

Page 22: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Senior Survey: Satisfaction with Computing F05, Sp 06

2.80

3.15 3.13

2.802.93 3.02

3.142.95

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Page 23: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Senior Survey: Satisfaction with Campus Services I F 05, Sp 06

2.87

3.28

2.81

3.23 3.15 3.06 3.12 3.032.94

3.353.20

2.78

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Page 24: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Senior Survey: Satisfaction with Campus Services II F 05, Sp 06

3.063.29

3.15 3.123.093.123.01

3.273.15 2.99

2.832.98

3.23.18

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

Page 25: Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264

Senior Survey: Satisfaction with Campus Services III F 05 Sp 06

3.123 2.98

3.092.93 2.983.022.953.04

2.883.04

2.923.04 2.98

3.17

2.72

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4