Upload
dumchi
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
1/55
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
2/55
PRESTON UNIVERSITY
Mutahir bin yousaf
1611-208-002
Muhammad jameel
1611-209-002
Abdul ghani
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
3/55
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to thanks Sir, for giving ussuch an opportunity to stand in front of you all and
to throw light on Search and evaluation .
Thank you sir .
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
4/55
Topic
Search and evaluation
Mutahir Search
The Information search process
Pre purchase search:
Ongoing search
Internal search:
External search:
Types of information
Sources of information
Amount of external search activity Perceived risk:
Dealing with risk:
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
5/55
Muhammad jameel
The information evaluation process Evaluation or choice criteria
Reducing the range of alternatives:
Evaluating alternatives:
Decision:
Noncompensatory decision rules:
Disjunctive rule:
Conjunctive decision rule:
Lexicographic rule:
Compensatory decision rule:
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
6/55
Abdul Ghani
Marketing implications
Studying the information search process:
Determining sources of information:
Warranty card:
In Depth search:
Decisive effectiveness:
Contributory effectiveness:
Ineffective:
Influencing the consumers evoked set:
Measuring evaluative criteria:
Determining the importance of criteria used by consumers:
Determining consumers evaluations of brand criteria performance:
Determining consumers cue usage:
Influencing consumers Evaluation:
Altering cue characteristics:
Altering information value:
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
7/55
Search and evaluation
Search
To make a thorough examination of; look over carefullyin order to find something; explore.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
8/55
Evaluation
evaluation as a systematic survey of values or features of
a given programme, activity or an object, taking intoconsideration the adopted criteria to enhance, improve or
understand them better.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
9/55
The Information search process
The first step in the consumer decision making model is the need
recognition. Only after realizing a problem, a need or a demand,consumers begin searching for information that will solve their
problem or satisfy their needs or demands.
Steps Of Information search process
Pre purchase search:
Consumers engage in pre-purchase information seeking when
they have identified a product need and are seeking information
that will enable them to make better decisions and increase the
probability of satisfaction with purchase outcome
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
10/55
Ongoing search
In ongoing information search consumers undertake
search without a specific problem. For example theremay be consumers who are crazy about motorcycles.
They may or may not own the vehicle but may be
interested in any information on motorcycles
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
11/55
Internal search:
Internal search involves the consumer identifying
alternatives from his or her memory. For certain lowinvolvement products, it is very important that
marketing programs achieve top of mind
awareness. For example for fast food restaurants;
thus, the consumer must be able to retrieve onesrestaurant from
memory before it will be considered.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
12/55
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
13/55
External search:
For high involvement products, consumers are more
likely to use an external search. Before buying a car, for
example, the consumer may ask friends opinions, read
reviews in Consumer Reports, consult several web sites,
and visit several dealerships. Thus, firms that make
products that are selected predominantly throughexternal search must invest in having information
available to the consumer in neede.g., through
brochures, web sites, or news coverage.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
14/55
Types of information
1) About the existance and availability of different
products and services:This type of information is required by a person when
he is very less aware about different varieties of
product or services of some specific product category
E.G want to purchase television but dont know what
type of eg LCD, LED Plasma tv of which company
samsung, L.G etc
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
15/55
2) Information required in forming evaluative criteria:
Here information is required by the person in
accordance to his/her needs ,taste etc to set certainstandards to evaluate different products or services
E.G 60 inch screen, black colour, with waranty, within
90,000 thousand Rs
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
16/55
3) Information about characteristics of alternatives:
Here the person seeks as much information as he can
about all the alternative products so then he can finallycompare those alternatives and selects one
e.g LG 60" (152cm) Plasma TV, Model: 60PA6500,
1920 x 1080 pixel resolution, HD Digital Tuner, 1yr
warranty. Includes: Widescreen, Full HD Display, USBConnector, Full HD Input. 98703 Rs
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
17/55
Samsung 60" (152cm) 3D Plasma TV, Model:
PS64E550, 1920 x 1080 pixel resolution, HD
Digital Tuner, Includes: Widescreen, Full HD
Display, USB Connector, 3D Display, Internet
Connectivity, USB Recording, Web Browsing,
IPTV. 158103 Rs
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
18/55
Sources of information
1) Marketer- dominated sources:
Here the person gets information from salesperson,packaging, advertising, company website etc
2) Consumer sources: here the person gets information
from friends, relatives, family members and all those
who are interpersonal communications not under the
control of the marketer
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
19/55
3) Neutral sources:
Here the person gets information from mass media,government reports and publications from
independent product testing agencies etc.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
20/55
Amount of external search activity
The easier it is to acquire relevant information, the less
necessary is an extensive external search. If consumers
realize that relevant information can be obtained
quickly, they are unlikely to engage in a high-energy,
time-consuming, external search
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
21/55
Factors influencing the amount of external search
1) Market conditions:
Availability of information, number of alternatives
available, and the location of outlets are among the most
triggering factors.
a) Price differences between brands are greater
b) Style and appearance are perceived to be quiteimportant
c) It is suspected that substantial differences may exist
between product alternatives.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
22/55
2) Buying strategies:
Consumers mainly adopt various strategies to reduce
external search and the factors are:a)Store loyalty
b)Buy the product which already someone is using in their
social circle.
Under the influence of manufacturer promises of money
back guarantee etc
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
23/55
Individual factors: The amount of external search is
affected by the persons own characteristics
a)Greater market experience with a product is associated
than a lower degree of external search.
b)The subjective costs associated with the search,
including time spent and anxiety while searching
c) Persons ability to move in search of informationd) His or her level of education the lower the level the
lesser he will conduct external search.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
24/55
Situational factors:
a)Urgency of a need
b)Special opportunities available within certain timeperiod
c)store condition being crowded or not
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
25/55
Perceived risk:
Consumer may Perceive risk in relationship to
information acquisition and processingconstructs such as word-of-mouth behavior and
opinion-leadership, as well as to overt consumer
behaviors such as new product adoption,store/brand loyalty, and modes of shopping
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
26/55
Situations influencing risk:
Some of the major situations are
a) First time purchase of a high cost product
b) Uncertainty regarding which alternative to take
c) When buying for some other person
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
27/55
Types of risk:
There are six types of perceived risk:
Functional - Will the product perform as I expect? If the
customer is buying sweet corn, this means, "Will this corn
be as good as what I remember from last year or what I
had last week?" If the customer is buying petunias, the
risk is, "Will they make my garden look the way I want it
to look?"
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
28/55
Physical - Can the product hurt me, my children or my
pets? The use of pesticides in the production of food
crops is frequently the concern here, but ornamentals that
bear poisonous fruit can also be a concern.
Social - What will my peers think? If customers are
buying sweet corn to eat in the privacy of their home, the
risk here is low. If they buy petunias and plant them in
the front yard and petunias are socially out this year, it's
like having a big sign in your yard for five months
saying, "geek lives here".
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
29/55
Psychological - Am I doing the right thing? This can
be a strong motivator in plant sales for the environ-
mentally concerned or an impossible obstacle for the
truly paranoid.
Financial - Can I afford the purchase? This is not a
major problem for most people buying sweet corn or
petunias. It is a major obstacle for customersconsider-ing a specimen plant or flowering trees that
may cost $60 to $100.
Time - How much time and effort may I expend tomake this purchase?
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
30/55
Dealing with risk: some of the ways to reduce perceived
risk are
1) Endorsement;
2)Brand Loyalty;
3) Major Brand Image;
4) Private Testing;
5) Store Image;
6) Free Sample;
7) Money-Back Guarantee;
8) Government Testing;
10) Expensive Model;
11) Word-Of-Mouth.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
31/55
The information evaluation process
As the consumer is engaged in search activity he or
she is also actively engaged in information
evaluation:
Evaluation or choice criteria:
Here consumer sets choice criteria to evaluates a
brand on the basis of his choice which he has set asstandard for comparison like of plasma tv in which
the consumer will evaluate all the characteristics of
the brands on the standards of his choice criteria e.g
price, colour, warranty etc.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
32/55
Reducing the range of alternatives:
In this step during evaluation of brands the consumerwill drop the brands which are not up to the mark of
his choice criteria like the price of Samsung is above
of his affordability so he will drop that and compare
LG with other brands and then drop more brandswhich are not up to his standard in this way very less
alternatives will be left to choose from
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
33/55
Evaluating alternatives:
The consumer keep going on evaluating alternative
unless he has two or three alternatives are left in which
he is confused to choose because all are upto the mark
of his choice
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
34/55
Decision:
finally the consumer will choose one product which
he thinks is best and in accordance with his choicecriteria by following certain decision rules which are
Noncompensatory decision rules:
A type of consumer decision rule by which positive
evaluation of a brand attribute does not compensate
for (i.e. is not balanced against) a negative evaluation
of the same brand on some other attribute. There arethree noncompensatory decision rules.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
35/55
Disjunctive rule:
A noncompensatory decision rule in which consumers
establish a minimally acceptable cutoff point for eachrelevant product attribute.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
36/55
Conjunctive decision rule:
A noncompensatory decision rule in which consumers
establish a minimally acceptable cutoff point for eachattribute evaluated. Brands that fall below the cutoff
point on any one attribute are eliminated from further
consideration
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
37/55
Lexicographic rule:
A noncompensatory decision rule - consumers first rank
product attributes in terms of importance, then compare
brands in terms of the attribute considered most
important.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
38/55
Compensatory decision rule:
A type of decision rule in which a consumer evaluates
each brand in terms of each relevant attribute and then
selects the brand with the highest weighted score
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
39/55
Marketing implications
Studying the information search process:For the marketer to understand how consumer works on
information search process so he can make available the
kind and quality of information which consumer seeks
the marketer first has to understand about the sources ofinformation used by the consumer
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
40/55
Determining sources of information:
Some of the sources through which marketer can get
some information about the consumer are:Warranty card:
Marketers can use waranty registration cards to get
information about the consumer information search
activities but it is limited it only tells place of purchase
of a product, date of purchase of product but many
questions are left unanswered
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
41/55
In Depth search:
One of the best method to determine sources of
information of consumers is by doing in depth
research in which most prominent method is by
developing a questionnaries to ask specific questions
How did you learn about this new product
Why did you decide to buy this brand With whom you have shared the information about
this brand
Where else you have found the information about thisbrand
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
42/55
Determining source influence:
For the marketer to understand the influence ofinformation sources on brand purchase intentions and
fulfillment several steps of analysis are required.
One typology for comparing various information sources
are:
1) Decisive effectiveness: The consumer evaluates this
source as having a major impact on the decision process
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
43/55
Contributory effectiveness:
The consumer evaluates this source as playing a specific
role in the decision process, although it is not among the
most important sources.
Ineffective:
This source is considered as having no particular role inthe decision process
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
44/55
Influencing the consumers evoked set:
The consumer compares the brands and products thatare in their evoked set.
The evoked set refers to the number of alternativesthat are considered by consumers during the problem-solving process.
How can the marketing organization increase the
likelihood that their brand is part of the consumer'sevoked set?
Consumers evaluate alternatives in terms of thefunctional and psychological benefits that they offer.
The marketing organization needs to understand whatbenefits consumers are seeking and therefore whichattributes are most important in terms of making adecision.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
45/55
Measuring evaluative criteria:
For the marketer to develop a successful marketing
campaign he has to understand of what criteria
consumer uses in their decision making process
1) Determining which criteria are used by
consumers:
By directly asking consumers through questionnaires.
Through group discussions
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
46/55
Through exploratory survey
Through online blogs
h f d b
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
47/55
Determining the importance of criteria used by
consumers:
A direct method for researching this couldinvolve the use of rating scale, method whereby
consumers would be asked to evaluate each
criterion on a six point scale ranging from
perhaps unimportant to important.
Another approach would be to use a semanticdifferential with pairs of adjectives
characterizing the criteria, such as high price,
and low price.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
48/55
A third approach involves what is known as a
constant sum scale, in which respondents
typically allocate 100 points across theevaluative criteria according to their judgment of
each ones importance.
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
49/55
Determining consumers evaluations of brand
criteria performance:
Select samples of consumers and give them
sample of products and then ask them how they
will evaluate it on performance criteria
D t i i
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
50/55
Determining consumers cue usage:
The marketer must understand the consumers cue usage
in his/her decision making
Three product cues that have been found to be the
most important in consumers ratings of product
quality: physical appearance : Physical appearance of the
product is important for the consumer and it becomes
more important if the product is costly
b d
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
51/55
brand :
some customers are very much brand conscious in
purchase decisions for a number of products Several
studies have shown that consumers use high status or
well-known brand
names as indicators of apparel product quality
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
52/55
price :
Price is important to consumers because it
represents the sacrifice necessary to obtaingoods. Perceived price may be described as the
consumers judgment of the acceptability
of the products price and is largely dependent on the
consumers expected price. In other words,consumers generally have a preconceived acceptable
price range
I fl i E l ti
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
53/55
Influencing consumers Evaluation:
If the product is not well accepted in the market then
the marketer have to change its position in the
customers mind.
Altering cue characteristics:
Making product packaging more eye catching
Changing the price of the product according to the mind
set of its target market
Alt i i f ti l
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
54/55
Altering information value:
Rather than changing characteristics of a cue it may
be possible to change the way consumers evaluate a
product
Changing the message type like surf excel has done
by spreading a message dirt is good when others aresaying dirt is bad by doing this surf excel has
successfully made a unique position in consumers
mind
7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers
55/55