Search and evaluation by consumers

  • Upload
    dumchi

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    1/55

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    2/55

    PRESTON UNIVERSITY

    Mutahir bin yousaf

    1611-208-002

    Muhammad jameel

    1611-209-002

    Abdul ghani

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    3/55

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    We would like to thanks Sir, for giving ussuch an opportunity to stand in front of you all and

    to throw light on Search and evaluation .

    Thank you sir .

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    4/55

    Topic

    Search and evaluation

    Mutahir Search

    The Information search process

    Pre purchase search:

    Ongoing search

    Internal search:

    External search:

    Types of information

    Sources of information

    Amount of external search activity Perceived risk:

    Dealing with risk:

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    5/55

    Muhammad jameel

    The information evaluation process Evaluation or choice criteria

    Reducing the range of alternatives:

    Evaluating alternatives:

    Decision:

    Noncompensatory decision rules:

    Disjunctive rule:

    Conjunctive decision rule:

    Lexicographic rule:

    Compensatory decision rule:

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    6/55

    Abdul Ghani

    Marketing implications

    Studying the information search process:

    Determining sources of information:

    Warranty card:

    In Depth search:

    Decisive effectiveness:

    Contributory effectiveness:

    Ineffective:

    Influencing the consumers evoked set:

    Measuring evaluative criteria:

    Determining the importance of criteria used by consumers:

    Determining consumers evaluations of brand criteria performance:

    Determining consumers cue usage:

    Influencing consumers Evaluation:

    Altering cue characteristics:

    Altering information value:

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    7/55

    Search and evaluation

    Search

    To make a thorough examination of; look over carefullyin order to find something; explore.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    8/55

    Evaluation

    evaluation as a systematic survey of values or features of

    a given programme, activity or an object, taking intoconsideration the adopted criteria to enhance, improve or

    understand them better.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    9/55

    The Information search process

    The first step in the consumer decision making model is the need

    recognition. Only after realizing a problem, a need or a demand,consumers begin searching for information that will solve their

    problem or satisfy their needs or demands.

    Steps Of Information search process

    Pre purchase search:

    Consumers engage in pre-purchase information seeking when

    they have identified a product need and are seeking information

    that will enable them to make better decisions and increase the

    probability of satisfaction with purchase outcome

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    10/55

    Ongoing search

    In ongoing information search consumers undertake

    search without a specific problem. For example theremay be consumers who are crazy about motorcycles.

    They may or may not own the vehicle but may be

    interested in any information on motorcycles

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    11/55

    Internal search:

    Internal search involves the consumer identifying

    alternatives from his or her memory. For certain lowinvolvement products, it is very important that

    marketing programs achieve top of mind

    awareness. For example for fast food restaurants;

    thus, the consumer must be able to retrieve onesrestaurant from

    memory before it will be considered.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    12/55

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    13/55

    External search:

    For high involvement products, consumers are more

    likely to use an external search. Before buying a car, for

    example, the consumer may ask friends opinions, read

    reviews in Consumer Reports, consult several web sites,

    and visit several dealerships. Thus, firms that make

    products that are selected predominantly throughexternal search must invest in having information

    available to the consumer in neede.g., through

    brochures, web sites, or news coverage.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    14/55

    Types of information

    1) About the existance and availability of different

    products and services:This type of information is required by a person when

    he is very less aware about different varieties of

    product or services of some specific product category

    E.G want to purchase television but dont know what

    type of eg LCD, LED Plasma tv of which company

    samsung, L.G etc

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    15/55

    2) Information required in forming evaluative criteria:

    Here information is required by the person in

    accordance to his/her needs ,taste etc to set certainstandards to evaluate different products or services

    E.G 60 inch screen, black colour, with waranty, within

    90,000 thousand Rs

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    16/55

    3) Information about characteristics of alternatives:

    Here the person seeks as much information as he can

    about all the alternative products so then he can finallycompare those alternatives and selects one

    e.g LG 60" (152cm) Plasma TV, Model: 60PA6500,

    1920 x 1080 pixel resolution, HD Digital Tuner, 1yr

    warranty. Includes: Widescreen, Full HD Display, USBConnector, Full HD Input. 98703 Rs

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    17/55

    Samsung 60" (152cm) 3D Plasma TV, Model:

    PS64E550, 1920 x 1080 pixel resolution, HD

    Digital Tuner, Includes: Widescreen, Full HD

    Display, USB Connector, 3D Display, Internet

    Connectivity, USB Recording, Web Browsing,

    IPTV. 158103 Rs

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    18/55

    Sources of information

    1) Marketer- dominated sources:

    Here the person gets information from salesperson,packaging, advertising, company website etc

    2) Consumer sources: here the person gets information

    from friends, relatives, family members and all those

    who are interpersonal communications not under the

    control of the marketer

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    19/55

    3) Neutral sources:

    Here the person gets information from mass media,government reports and publications from

    independent product testing agencies etc.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    20/55

    Amount of external search activity

    The easier it is to acquire relevant information, the less

    necessary is an extensive external search. If consumers

    realize that relevant information can be obtained

    quickly, they are unlikely to engage in a high-energy,

    time-consuming, external search

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    21/55

    Factors influencing the amount of external search

    1) Market conditions:

    Availability of information, number of alternatives

    available, and the location of outlets are among the most

    triggering factors.

    a) Price differences between brands are greater

    b) Style and appearance are perceived to be quiteimportant

    c) It is suspected that substantial differences may exist

    between product alternatives.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    22/55

    2) Buying strategies:

    Consumers mainly adopt various strategies to reduce

    external search and the factors are:a)Store loyalty

    b)Buy the product which already someone is using in their

    social circle.

    Under the influence of manufacturer promises of money

    back guarantee etc

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    23/55

    Individual factors: The amount of external search is

    affected by the persons own characteristics

    a)Greater market experience with a product is associated

    than a lower degree of external search.

    b)The subjective costs associated with the search,

    including time spent and anxiety while searching

    c) Persons ability to move in search of informationd) His or her level of education the lower the level the

    lesser he will conduct external search.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    24/55

    Situational factors:

    a)Urgency of a need

    b)Special opportunities available within certain timeperiod

    c)store condition being crowded or not

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    25/55

    Perceived risk:

    Consumer may Perceive risk in relationship to

    information acquisition and processingconstructs such as word-of-mouth behavior and

    opinion-leadership, as well as to overt consumer

    behaviors such as new product adoption,store/brand loyalty, and modes of shopping

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    26/55

    Situations influencing risk:

    Some of the major situations are

    a) First time purchase of a high cost product

    b) Uncertainty regarding which alternative to take

    c) When buying for some other person

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    27/55

    Types of risk:

    There are six types of perceived risk:

    Functional - Will the product perform as I expect? If the

    customer is buying sweet corn, this means, "Will this corn

    be as good as what I remember from last year or what I

    had last week?" If the customer is buying petunias, the

    risk is, "Will they make my garden look the way I want it

    to look?"

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    28/55

    Physical - Can the product hurt me, my children or my

    pets? The use of pesticides in the production of food

    crops is frequently the concern here, but ornamentals that

    bear poisonous fruit can also be a concern.

    Social - What will my peers think? If customers are

    buying sweet corn to eat in the privacy of their home, the

    risk here is low. If they buy petunias and plant them in

    the front yard and petunias are socially out this year, it's

    like having a big sign in your yard for five months

    saying, "geek lives here".

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    29/55

    Psychological - Am I doing the right thing? This can

    be a strong motivator in plant sales for the environ-

    mentally concerned or an impossible obstacle for the

    truly paranoid.

    Financial - Can I afford the purchase? This is not a

    major problem for most people buying sweet corn or

    petunias. It is a major obstacle for customersconsider-ing a specimen plant or flowering trees that

    may cost $60 to $100.

    Time - How much time and effort may I expend tomake this purchase?

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    30/55

    Dealing with risk: some of the ways to reduce perceived

    risk are

    1) Endorsement;

    2)Brand Loyalty;

    3) Major Brand Image;

    4) Private Testing;

    5) Store Image;

    6) Free Sample;

    7) Money-Back Guarantee;

    8) Government Testing;

    10) Expensive Model;

    11) Word-Of-Mouth.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    31/55

    The information evaluation process

    As the consumer is engaged in search activity he or

    she is also actively engaged in information

    evaluation:

    Evaluation or choice criteria:

    Here consumer sets choice criteria to evaluates a

    brand on the basis of his choice which he has set asstandard for comparison like of plasma tv in which

    the consumer will evaluate all the characteristics of

    the brands on the standards of his choice criteria e.g

    price, colour, warranty etc.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    32/55

    Reducing the range of alternatives:

    In this step during evaluation of brands the consumerwill drop the brands which are not up to the mark of

    his choice criteria like the price of Samsung is above

    of his affordability so he will drop that and compare

    LG with other brands and then drop more brandswhich are not up to his standard in this way very less

    alternatives will be left to choose from

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    33/55

    Evaluating alternatives:

    The consumer keep going on evaluating alternative

    unless he has two or three alternatives are left in which

    he is confused to choose because all are upto the mark

    of his choice

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    34/55

    Decision:

    finally the consumer will choose one product which

    he thinks is best and in accordance with his choicecriteria by following certain decision rules which are

    Noncompensatory decision rules:

    A type of consumer decision rule by which positive

    evaluation of a brand attribute does not compensate

    for (i.e. is not balanced against) a negative evaluation

    of the same brand on some other attribute. There arethree noncompensatory decision rules.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    35/55

    Disjunctive rule:

    A noncompensatory decision rule in which consumers

    establish a minimally acceptable cutoff point for eachrelevant product attribute.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    36/55

    Conjunctive decision rule:

    A noncompensatory decision rule in which consumers

    establish a minimally acceptable cutoff point for eachattribute evaluated. Brands that fall below the cutoff

    point on any one attribute are eliminated from further

    consideration

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    37/55

    Lexicographic rule:

    A noncompensatory decision rule - consumers first rank

    product attributes in terms of importance, then compare

    brands in terms of the attribute considered most

    important.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    38/55

    Compensatory decision rule:

    A type of decision rule in which a consumer evaluates

    each brand in terms of each relevant attribute and then

    selects the brand with the highest weighted score

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    39/55

    Marketing implications

    Studying the information search process:For the marketer to understand how consumer works on

    information search process so he can make available the

    kind and quality of information which consumer seeks

    the marketer first has to understand about the sources ofinformation used by the consumer

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    40/55

    Determining sources of information:

    Some of the sources through which marketer can get

    some information about the consumer are:Warranty card:

    Marketers can use waranty registration cards to get

    information about the consumer information search

    activities but it is limited it only tells place of purchase

    of a product, date of purchase of product but many

    questions are left unanswered

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    41/55

    In Depth search:

    One of the best method to determine sources of

    information of consumers is by doing in depth

    research in which most prominent method is by

    developing a questionnaries to ask specific questions

    How did you learn about this new product

    Why did you decide to buy this brand With whom you have shared the information about

    this brand

    Where else you have found the information about thisbrand

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    42/55

    Determining source influence:

    For the marketer to understand the influence ofinformation sources on brand purchase intentions and

    fulfillment several steps of analysis are required.

    One typology for comparing various information sources

    are:

    1) Decisive effectiveness: The consumer evaluates this

    source as having a major impact on the decision process

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    43/55

    Contributory effectiveness:

    The consumer evaluates this source as playing a specific

    role in the decision process, although it is not among the

    most important sources.

    Ineffective:

    This source is considered as having no particular role inthe decision process

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    44/55

    Influencing the consumers evoked set:

    The consumer compares the brands and products thatare in their evoked set.

    The evoked set refers to the number of alternativesthat are considered by consumers during the problem-solving process.

    How can the marketing organization increase the

    likelihood that their brand is part of the consumer'sevoked set?

    Consumers evaluate alternatives in terms of thefunctional and psychological benefits that they offer.

    The marketing organization needs to understand whatbenefits consumers are seeking and therefore whichattributes are most important in terms of making adecision.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    45/55

    Measuring evaluative criteria:

    For the marketer to develop a successful marketing

    campaign he has to understand of what criteria

    consumer uses in their decision making process

    1) Determining which criteria are used by

    consumers:

    By directly asking consumers through questionnaires.

    Through group discussions

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    46/55

    Through exploratory survey

    Through online blogs

    h f d b

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    47/55

    Determining the importance of criteria used by

    consumers:

    A direct method for researching this couldinvolve the use of rating scale, method whereby

    consumers would be asked to evaluate each

    criterion on a six point scale ranging from

    perhaps unimportant to important.

    Another approach would be to use a semanticdifferential with pairs of adjectives

    characterizing the criteria, such as high price,

    and low price.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    48/55

    A third approach involves what is known as a

    constant sum scale, in which respondents

    typically allocate 100 points across theevaluative criteria according to their judgment of

    each ones importance.

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    49/55

    Determining consumers evaluations of brand

    criteria performance:

    Select samples of consumers and give them

    sample of products and then ask them how they

    will evaluate it on performance criteria

    D t i i

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    50/55

    Determining consumers cue usage:

    The marketer must understand the consumers cue usage

    in his/her decision making

    Three product cues that have been found to be the

    most important in consumers ratings of product

    quality: physical appearance : Physical appearance of the

    product is important for the consumer and it becomes

    more important if the product is costly

    b d

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    51/55

    brand :

    some customers are very much brand conscious in

    purchase decisions for a number of products Several

    studies have shown that consumers use high status or

    well-known brand

    names as indicators of apparel product quality

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    52/55

    price :

    Price is important to consumers because it

    represents the sacrifice necessary to obtaingoods. Perceived price may be described as the

    consumers judgment of the acceptability

    of the products price and is largely dependent on the

    consumers expected price. In other words,consumers generally have a preconceived acceptable

    price range

    I fl i E l ti

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    53/55

    Influencing consumers Evaluation:

    If the product is not well accepted in the market then

    the marketer have to change its position in the

    customers mind.

    Altering cue characteristics:

    Making product packaging more eye catching

    Changing the price of the product according to the mind

    set of its target market

    Alt i i f ti l

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    54/55

    Altering information value:

    Rather than changing characteristics of a cue it may

    be possible to change the way consumers evaluate a

    product

    Changing the message type like surf excel has done

    by spreading a message dirt is good when others aresaying dirt is bad by doing this surf excel has

    successfully made a unique position in consumers

    mind

  • 7/30/2019 Search and evaluation by consumers

    55/55