SCLT Meeting 25 January 2012 - Step Change in …...• Do we/should we have a common set of competency assessments standards for core disciplines ? • How do we as an industry gain

SCLT Meeting

25th January 2012

Safety Brief

Agenda

Item No.

Time Item Mins

1 0800 Fire & Safety Brief 5

Dave Nicholls

2 0805 Co-Chair Introduction 5 Martin Ellins/Ken

Robertson

3 0810 Safety Moment 10

Neil McCulloch

4 0820 Oil & Gas UK update 10

Robert Paterson

5 0830 HSE update 15

Steve Walker

6 0845 Competence Workgroup – next steps 10 Neil

McCulloch/Peter 6 0845 Competence Workgroup – next steps 10 McCulloch/Peter Murphy

0855 Coffee break 10

7 0905 Asset Integrity Workgroup - update 20

Steve Bullock/Geoff

Holmes

8 0925 HSSG update 20

Alan Chesterman

9 0945 Industry Safety Leadership Day 20

Dave Nicholls

10 1005 Workforce Engagement 20

Mike Bowyer

11 1025 Support Team changes 15 Dave Nicholls 11 1040 AOB 10 All

Co-chair Introduction Martin Ellins

Welcomes & changes

Les Linklater – Support Team Project MgrLes Linklater – Support Team Project Mgr

Gillian Simpson – Business Analyst (from 1st Feb)

Eddie Perkins – Marine Safety Forum (replaces Karl Fear)

Jon Richards (Diamond Drilling) – IADC replaces Glenn White

Adrian Rose – (Transocean) replaces Paul King

Chris Bennet (Stena Drilling) – Safety Rep

Terry O’Halloran (Sodexo) – Safety Rep

Steve Walton (WoodgroupPSN) – Safety Rep

Safety Moment

Neil McCullochNeil McCulloch

BG Group

Oil & Gas UK update

Robert Paterson

Health & Safety Executive

UpdateUpdate

Steve Walker

Competence Workgroup

UpdatePeter Murphy & Neil McCulloch

SC Competence Initiatives - Overview

?

Project Activites Who 20 11 2012

1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

MIST Feedback & Refine WG/Companies

Permit Develop standards & roll-out plan WG/Opito

Authority Approve Plan SCLT

Roll-out & industry implementation WG/Companies

Lifting Develop standards & roll-out plan WG/Opito

Standards & Approve Plan SCLT

Training Roll-out & industry implementation WG/Companies

Leadership Appraise ideas, select & justify project WG

Approve concept SCLT

?Approve concept SCLT

Develop standards & roll-out plan WG/Opito

Approve Plan SCLT


Mechanical Appraise ideas, select & justify project WG

Joint Approve concept SCLT

Integrity Develop standards & roll-out plan WG/Opito

Approve Plan SCLT


Key

Concept

decision

Ideas &

business case

Develop

concept

Decide to

implement

Industry

roll-out

Project

complete

Feed back

& improve

Questions & Requests

• How do we launch new products?

• Volunteers to join the Competence Work Group

• Need to consider new projects?– PAS55?

– Golden Golden Rules?– Golden Golden Rules?

• Leadership Project– Originally decided to move to Watch status

– OPITO/Open University confused

– Move project to Mentor status?

Tea and Coffee

Asset Integrity WorkgroupUpdate

Steve Bullock & Geoff Holmes

HCR DATA

Type/year 2010/11Nov 2011

(half year point for

2011/12)

Total HCRs 16791

Total HCRs 16791

(182 end 2011/12)

Major & Significant

7340

(80 end 2011/12)

Publication of HCR data

HCR Reduction – FPF/FPSOs Workgroup

Group membersJohn Fleming (co-chair),

Peter Main (Bluewater),

Chris Wray (Shell),

tbc (Premier Oil)

Adam Petersen (co-chair),

Bob Gilbert (Maersk FPSOs),

tbc (Maersk Oil),

Dave Nicholls (SC),

Ron Edgar (Petrofac),

Dave Austen (Chevron),

Meeting Schedule14th February

6th March

8th May

Initial kick-off

2nd Meeting

3rd Meeting

BP, Dyce

tbc

tbc8th May

14th August

16th October

3 Meeting

4th Meeting

5th Meeting

tbc

tbc

tbc

Objective1. To determine/ascertain common failure modes on FPF/FPSOs which lead to HCRs.

2. To determine/ascertain the reasons behind why FPF/FPSOs incur disproportionate

HCRs.

Deliverables1. To provide guidance to industry on areas of focus for both brownfield units and new-

build FPF/FPSOs in order to eliminate HCRs.

Success criteria1. Development and issue of bespoke asset integrity guidelines to be utilised on

floating installations.

Summary TOR

HCR Prevention Workgroup

• Workgroup established with good representation from Operators (12), Key Contractors and HSE

• TOR established, deliverables and work-plan defined:

– Prioritised common root causes mapped to solutions

– HCR Prevention Improvement Plan template / model

– Mechanisms for sharing best practice

• Web site• Web site

• Seminars and Workforce Engagement Events

– HCR Prevention DVD (designed to engage hearts and minds)

• Supporting O&GUK Seminar in March

• Establishing links with other workgroups (FPSO, Competence, Technical Authorities, Verification) to ensure alignment

Key steps :

• Pull together a working group, (cross section of industry- Client and service companies)

• Use a simple Continuous Improvement model as our framework fro the workgroup, see example in last slide....

• Define the problem we are looking to resolve....

• Gather data/info :

– Survey what is currently operational across the industry

TA Workgroup

– Survey what is currently operational across the industry

– Engage with H&S executive on their thoughts and experience

– Review different models structure and roles and accountabilities

– Review competency models

• Do we/should we have a common set of competency assessments standards for core disciplines ?

• How do we as an industry gain assurance that specialist TAs such as lifting has the capability and competency to deliver on the Oil & Gas needs both now and looking forward

TA Workgroup ToR

• Understand the implementation of the TA role in the UK Oil & Gas sector.

• Define key attributes of the role of a TA

• Report on the role of TA in individual companies

• Build on previous questionnaire on TAs, under taken post KP3

• Prepare a single document outlining guidance on role and responsibilities of a TA

• Report to AI steering group by End of Q1

• Prepare draft guidance by end Q3 2012

23 February 2012

Pictures / details of current situation; Data charts etc....

Compare results to target.Identify & implement what is

needed to sustain the

What did we learn from doing this project?

What could we do better next time?Where else could this improvement be

applied?

Continuous Improvement

What is wrong / With what / By how much / What’s the benefit to the business ?

Goal Statement: Scope, improvement goal, metric, by when.

Always Start at this point

CI Process

19

Brainstorm list of ideas and prioritise/select

Improvement actions with actionees & target dates.

Track progress regular basis

needed to sustain the improvement. Improvement

CycleWhy is this happening? X 5

etc...

Verification subgroup

• 3-tier document structure

– Leadership - complete

– Workforce – in preparation

– Practitioner – draft review complete

• Promotion

– March 15th HCR seminar

• Well integrity

– WLCPF input into all tiers of guidance

• Challenges

– Tech authoring after 9th March

SCLT Meeting

HSSG Update

25-Jan-2012

Update topics

• AAIB G-REDL report

• Other Work

• 2012 Project Plan

G-REDL Update

• AAIB report published 24 November.

• A special HSSG meeting was held 5 December to discuss

recommendations, following which a newsletter was issued.

• Six of the 17 recommendations appeared in the interim

reports released in 2009 and were addressed immediately.

• 11 new recommendations are largely technical; responsibility

for implementation oversight is with CAA and HSSG will

monitor.

• CAA were issued 2 recommendations – accepted one and

deferred other to EASA

Other Issues

• Helideck integrity standards project planned to commence

2012.

• Weather data network - fully operational as of 1st November.

• Helideck Lighting – there had been some problems following • Helideck Lighting – there had been some problems following

installation for the trial period but these are rectifiable and

CAA will be publishing amendments to CAP 437 in Q2 2012.

Industry Safety Leadership DayDave Nicholls

Safety Leadership Day

• Format & duration

– same as last year

– fancy a change? Suggestions?

• Content

AgendaTime Item Mins Description Presenter

0800 Fire and Safety Brief 5 0805 Warm-up voting session 5 • General questions x 2 Martin Ellins/Ken Robertson

0810 Step Change – a look back and the way 25 forward

• Safety performance overview

• Overview of 2011

• Focus for 2012

• Scene setting session.

• Kick off with a review of industry safety performance (could be a separate session to start).

• A 10 min overview of the key achievements of 2011 (explaining more detail in poster sessions with workgroups)

• Look forward at 2012

• Introduce annual review

Martin Ellins/Ken Robertson

0835 Warm-down voting session 5 • General questions x 2 Martin Ellins/Ken Robertson

0840 Regulatory perspective 15 HSE perspective. SW to provide a steer but Steve Walker 0840 Regulatory perspective 15 HSE perspective. SW to provide a steer but would be good to include:

• Workforce engagement (sets up WE session)

• HCRs/AI

• Impact of Macondo incident

Steve Walker

0855 Workforce engagement-voting session 5 • Lead-in questions for WE session x 2 Ian Sharp

0900 Workforce Engagement 60 • Background to WE survey tool project

• Project status and roll-out plan

• Request for support/involvement (sign up sheet in room during day)

• Maturity model validation – involve delegates in scoring survey. Ideally using voting button system or paper-based (gets buy-in to tool) – 15 mins

Ian Sharp

Agenda

1000 Workforce engagement-voting session 5 • Follow-up questions x 2 Ian Sharp

1005 Coffee & networking 20 •

1025 AI voting session 5 • Lead-in questions x 2

1030 Asset Integrity 30

• HCR target & industry progress

• Data sharing – public HCR data + HCR plans

• HCRs – work of subgroups

• Verification workgroup

Geoff Homes/Steve Bullock

1100 Sharing – the challenge of legal privilege Paul & Williamson 20

• Legal privilege – the issues

• Options to promote sharing

Rona Jamieson

1120 AI voting session 5 •

1125 Workgroup Poster Session 60 Poster session – options:

• 5 posters – all groups (last year)

All

• 5 posters – all groups (last year)

• 3 posters – only groups not presenting

1225 Lunch 45 1320 WLCPF – links with Step Change 10

or SCLT Safety Rep session Brief presentation on work of WLCPF

WLCPF team member

1300 Industry Leadership – the way forward 30

Open forum session to obtain feedback and ask some key questions e.g. why are we not Step Changing? What help do you need from Step Change? Are we working on the right things?

Martin Ellins/Ken Robertson

1400 Close

Workforce Engagement

WorkgroupUpdate – January 2012

Progress Highlights• Pilot survey is now complete

– 830 returns

• Practical guide available in Draft form

• Close out workshop held with pilot participants to capture their input

– Input very positive and lessons learned will be incorporated in practical guide

– Participants expressed a desire to attend a follow up work shop

– Subsequent feedback suggests that the survey provides data not available from internal

surveys

• Subsea community will run follow up pilot in Q1 2012. Data will be

integrated with existing data already gathered.

• Focus in 1st half of ‘12 will be the successful launch and roll out of the

engagement survey tool

• Work Group strongly recommends we proceed and is now looking for SCLT

endorsement of the “go forward” plan

Survey Summary

Site Contact Installation Company Survey Dates Status

Returns as at

21st November

HSE Manager Denmore Road Facilities Cosalt Offshore 8th September - 30th September Closed 150

Offshore Operations Supervisor Dunlin Amec 7th October - 4th November Closed 110

OIM Maersk Curlew Maersk FPSOs 13th October - mid November Closed 35

OIM GP3 (FPSO) Maersk Oil North Sea 26th September - late October Closed 51

OIM Buzzard Nexen Petroleum Mid October - late November Closed 85

OIM Northern Producer Petrofac 12th September - 19th October Closed 81OIM Northern Producer Petrofac 12th September - 19th October Closed 81

OIM Kittiwake Petrofac 20th September - mid October Closed 66

OIM Brent Charlie Shell 21st September - 31st October Closed 121

Production & Wells Supt’ North Alwyn Total E&P 30th September - mid October Closed 67

NRS Division HR Manager Sedco 714 Transocean 1st October - mid November Closed 64

Grand Total 830

Example of Feedback

at Work Site Levelat Work Site Level

External benchmark report: Detailed dimension resultsA detailed view of the distribution of results for each dimension

Number of

responses

Missing

/ NA% Unf % Neu % Fav

Difference between %

Fav & industry

average

Industry

lowest

Industry

average

Industry

highest

Visibility 113 2 8 22 70 -3% 58% 73% 80%

Communication 113 8 5 23 72 -4% 61% 76% 83%

Involvement 113 4 7 16 77 -3% 65% 80% 87%

8

5

7

22

23

16

70

72

77

The overall number of

responses obtained in

the survey

The number of negative (UNFavourable),

NEUtral, and positive (FAVourable) results

divided by the total number of responses

For the sake of simplicity, all industry

benchmarks are made on the percentage

favourable scores

Support 113 7 6 26 68 -7% 60% 75% 82%

Participation 113 8 6 14 80 +8% 57% 72% 79%

Challenge 112 8 8 17 75 +2% 58% 73% 80%

6

6

8

26

14

17

68

80

75

The average number of

questions that were

missed in each dimension

Difference between the industry

average and percentage of

favourable responses

Details for all Workforce Engagement dimensions

Example of results for the PARTICIPATION dimension

What’s Next?

What is left to do?

Workforce Engagement Survey

Portal

20 days + Atlas development

Workforce Engagement

Toolkit (Practical Guide)

Project -related Communications

30 days + design & publishing

10 days + workshop delivery

The practical guide to workforce

engagement• “Behaviours Supporting Workforce Engagement – Obstacles to Workforce

Engagement = Improved Workforce Engagement Culture”

• The practical guide to workforce engagement (with related toolkit and

access to the Workforce Engagement Questionnaire) provides clear

guidance and practical support to implement the above. It provides the

WHY, the WHAT, and the HOW to increase workforce engagement in WHY, the WHAT, and the HOW to increase workforce engagement in

member organisations

• In short, the practical guide to workforce engagement exists to help every

worker participate in and challenge how safety is managed where they

work

• It is intended to provide an industry-specific, effective and holistic

approach that is flexible enough to meet the specific requirements of any

organisation

Workforce Engagement Work Group Project Plan

Project Activities Who 2011 2012

Workforce

Engagement

Assessment Tool

Survey Trial

Evaluate

Post survey workshop

Recommendation

Subsea Safety Forum

sponsored survey

System finalisation

Public launch

Worksites

WG

WG

WG/SCLT

SSF

WG

SCLTPublic launch SCLT

Practical

Engagement Guide

Finalise draft (80:20)

Workshop

Recommendation

Guide finalisation

Public launch

WG

WG

WG/SCLT

WG

SCLT

Ideas and business case Concept Decision WG activities SCLT DecisionSurvey Pilot EvaluateSystem development

Detailed Project plan and progress

Back Up Slides

Survey Feedback – Top bits of feedback on the Survey

and/or Guide

Positives:

• Main positive factor is that the survey is independent of all other Company surveys;

• The Survey is short, concise and simple to use;

• The Pilot has highlighted the need and usefulness in utilising the ESR’s in the Survey process;

Opportunities for improvement:Opportunities for improvement:

• The Survey was found to be very simple to use, however we need to ensure that there is a

more robust system for the collection and collating of paper copies;

• There was an issue regarding the tracking of Survey responses. This probably has more to do

with the anticipated feedback. There was an expectation amongst some that the location

issues would be reported back on a weekly basis;

• Some locations found that offering small incentives to complete helped with the uptake (i.e.

work break times dedicated to completing the survey; cokes and mars bars issued when

copies were handed in, etc).

Survey Feedback - Tips for anyone who is attempting

to run the survey for the first time

• Ensure thorough preparation has been undertaken

• Test the web link, etc

• Focal Points need to be prepared in advance of the Survey roll out;

• Ensure that they are aware of the difference between this Survey and the multitude of other

Survey’s that are in circulation. Also ensure that all participants are fully aware that the Survey

maintains complete anonymity.

• Need for ESR involvement from the outset and for each location to have clear and •

dedicated Focal Points;

• Before anybody completes the Survey, ensure that they are aware of the purpose

and objectives.

Survey Feedback - Tips on how best to launch the

Survey / Guide

• Decide who will be rolling out the Survey on an Organisational basis. Support

needs to come from the top all the way through the Organisation;

• The message needs to highlight that the Survey / Exercise is ‘solutions based’ and

not just another Survey;

• Set expectations from the outset – What do we want to achieve and clarify the

accountabilities;

• Plan the best time to undertake the Survey – outwith the Survey and Shutdown

season;

• Advertise and market in advance so people know that it is coming;

• Provide Workshop’s for the ESR’s and Focal Points in advance of the roll out.

Survey Feedback – Comments

• A very valuable survey, and going forward my personal opinion is that it will bring what is

required to the industry

• the results are encouraging, as always more to do but the quality and readability are really

good

• We both have enjoyed participating and would like to continue to do so

• As predicted they "did not see anything they did not already know" and there was a fair bit

of defensive discussion initially. As the discussion went on there was more recognition of the of defensive discussion initially. As the discussion went on there was more recognition of the

issues

• The Practical guide is very good and we like the format which is similar to the Human factors

data

Question results for the VISIBILITY dimension

Question results for the COMMUNICATION dimension

Question results for the INVOLVEMENT dimension

Question results for the SUPPORT dimension

Question results for the PARTICIPATION dimension

Question results for the CHALLENGE dimension

Proposed conceptual framework for the WEQ

The survey framework

Understanding the results

Developing action plan

How and when do surveys

add value to worksites?

Running the survey

Results feedback

Delivering improvements

We need to ensure very practical support for these critical phases!

Overall workforce engagement resultsA summary of workforce engagement, with overall maturity set by lowest dimension

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

Visibility• Key strength

• Key development point

Communication• Key strength


Involvement• Key strength


Support• Key strength


Participation• Key strength


Challenge• Key strength


Overall• Key strength


Engagement Behaviours

• These are the key behaviours that can be adopted to help

improve engagement at your worksite and within your

organisation.

• The Engagement Behaviours have been divided into six

key elements:

Workforce Engagement Continuous

Improvement Cycle

Overview of Workforce Engagement Reporting

ApproachApproach

A maturity model approach to reportingPresenting results in a way that focusses on meaning, not numbers

LEVEL 3WORKFORCE ENGAGEMENT

LEVEL 4 WORKFORCE ENGAGEMENT

Workforce and management working


Workforce leading the safety improvement

effort


Workforce disengaged with the

safety effort


Workforce partially engaged with the

safety effort

ENGAGEMENT

Workforce routinely engaged with the

safety effort

management working in partnership to improve safety

Each maturity level will include a description

of what the Workforce Engagement dimensions

look like at that level

Support TeamLes Linklater

Support Team, delivery model

Team Lead

Business Business Business

Project Manager

Team Lead: in post,

departing 9th Mar

Project Manager: in post, 3rd Jan

Business Analyst: recruited,

in post 1st Feb

Business Analyst: to be recruited

• Challenge – churn in team / transition, ability to maintain current expected levels of support.

• Opportunity – additional BA resource to be added, BA model will provide additional support

capabilities in mid-term.

Business Support

Business Analyst

Business Analyst

Business Analyst: to be recruited

Business Support: in post

Jan Feb March April May June July August Sep Oct Nov Dec

Leadership

TeamPlanning Day

Workforce

Engagement

Human

Factors

Competence

Helicopter

Safety

2012 CALENDAR

25 7 25 6 22 31 1226

19

26

11 29 13 29 10 3010

? ? ? ??

1 30 5

28 10 231122 05 6

22 24 26 2927

Safety

Asset

Integrity

Network

Meeting

Events

Incident

Analysis /

Root Cause

Industry

Leadership

Safety Day

Safety Awards Share Fair

Incident

Analysis /

Root Cause

Incident

Analysis /

Root Cause

15

14 18

2

20

12 21

28 27

24

28 22 28 30

1 30 5

15 16

Events, Focus & Rationalisation

Key Event Schedule (Current)

15/2 Network meeting #1 cancelled

14/3 Incident / RCA Workshop

15/3 Hydrocarbon Prevention Seminar

28/3 Industry Leadership Safety Day

Key Event Schedule (Proposed)

15/3 Hydrocarbon Prevention Seminar

28/3 Industry Leadership Safety Day

2/5 Network / WG Share Fair – tbc

20/6 WG Share Fair – Workforce Engagement

2/5 Network #2

20/6 Share Fair


12/9 Network #3


21/11 Network #4



• Network / Mini Share Fair concept

• Event boiler plate to be developed

• Workgroup lead

• Update, Launch, Share lessons ...

AOBAOB

Documents

SCLT Meeting 25 January 2012 - Step Change in …...• Do we/should we have a common set of competency assessments standards for core disciplines ? • How do we as an industry gain