Roo Notes on HARpO

8/8/2019 Roo Notes on HARpO

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/roo-notes-on-harpo 1/8

Roo Notes on HARP - November 2 -2010 V.1A

November 4, 2010

Added November 2 · Comment · Like

oSubmit

Polo Macera ...but for me, this means

"displacement"Tuesday at 6:19pm · Like

oSubmit

Vincent Cataldi This could be data beyond scopeof equipment, it looks 'out of time/space' to me, I

see scalar - wholly a guess on my part - perhapsRoo will offer an opinion of what his eye sees.

Tuesday at 10:42pm · Like

oSubmit

Roo Reindeer

Vince:I see activity in the ionosphere, natural or manmade is up for grabs.

My simplest explanation is based on the fact thatno one seems to feel these motions in the actualground. The amplitude is well above the level of what is normally a noticable shake. They last thebetter part of an hour. But no one notices.They are not random, as the well defined doubleperiodicity (two waves interleaved with about a 1




November 4, 2010

hour cycle offset from one another by about 20min, if I recall) we saw at KONO extended forseveral months. They occurred when the skyopposite KONO was in the night shadow of theearth. In june the sun shines at KONO ~18 hours.The nights are 6 hours. Same on the opposite sideof the earth at the same latitude. HAARP would see~18 hours day, 6 hours night. The KONO waveswere showing up near midday local time. Nighttime at HAARP. EVERY day, same thing. HAARPand just about anything else connected with theionosphere is usually night related as the sun altersthe nature of the ionosphere and reduces it's

reflectivity at most RF frequencies. AlthoughHAARP could alter this. Ionospheric waves knownas whistlers which oscillate between the magneticpoles can have natural periods of about an hour.Unlike the steady ones opposite HAARP at KONOmost of the others are not periodic. But they havethe same character. Since they don't propagatefrom station to station in a way a seismic wave"must" they are evidence of local disturbances inthe equipment.

Think of your model of water on a sphere withinteracting waves. If you pulse at one point thewaves go out and then reflect and reconverge atthe same point. But if you pulse at several points atdifferent times the waves will form a complexresultant which will reconverge at a point differentfrom any of the original source points. You can"direct" the waves to reconverge where you want.I think this is happening. They could be tune uptests for HAARP or "pings" with a pattern that willinduce weather or EQ effects over a period of time.Of course some may also be natural, solar driven.

It would be interesting to see if such pulses showup on seismos going back to the 19th century. Or if they are more recent only.

The actual activity may be scalar waves of somesort, but what the seismos are picking up is almostcertainly an electromagnetic "shadow or wake" inthe ionosphere above. Because the equipment iselectronic.

Yesterday at 5:59am · Like

oSubmit

Vincent Cataldi

Roo :

could it be that the whistlers are negated by theday time solar effects and just not reaching anatmosphere dense enough to 'transfer' theelectromagnetic concussion down to the surfacestations - always coming from an oscillating solar

source, but only effectively measured by electronics- during 'bad' HAM durations of night ? F1 and F2density - is this the HARP target, or its'consequence? (ignore detail if F1 / F2 are notprecise please - concept only)

Note : this is not my hunch, looking to eliminatethe apparent periods of an hour and 1/3 of an hourthrough destructive interference, rather than theconclusion of intelligent action - like it is planned.

Could something in upper atmosphere be acting asa parasitic element of a beam antenna - and if yes,is that a single or multiple driven element model -most likely ? Sun would act as a single drivenelement, while one or more HARP stationscould/would vector as a multiple driven elementarray - and then F1/F2 can be seen as a reflectorand director type of parasitic elements - perhaps(although I am stretching to find a natural systemhere).

I need to see Ionic and satellite data - can you fling

me the url for these - else I can check the yahoogroup to see if they are recorded in that archiveddata - likely they are.

I did find a web spider to snag above images in anautomated manner - and I have a lot of seismographic software loaded now for rawnumeric data capture of same, but little timesetting them up or test runs using them. Satelliteand ionosphere data may come in using web spideralso, if I remember back that far, well enough.

Roo - you are a Gift sir ... :)




November 4, 2010

Yesterday at 7:01am · Like

oSubmit

Nellie Moore I second that Roo. You are amazing!Thank you too Vincent!

Yesterday at 2:17pm · Like

oSubmit

Chris Burch wizards

Yesterday at 3:53pm · Like

oSubmit

Polo Macera genius

23 hours ago · Like

oSubmit

Vincenzo Cataldi

Roo :

For 'Sport', the Russians used our buried ELFsubmarine antenna built to communicate with craftbelow the ocean surface, before we had a chanceto use it : they 'powered' it, I was told, by using asatellite to 'energize' (vectored somehow) theantenna and sent messages to their subs.

Why build another, if the one in upper Michiganworks well enough for all, hey?

Along this general concept, can someone possiblybe using the Russian KONO HARP facility from aspace based platform (or scalar system anywhere)

- in a manner beyond their control

- a sympathetic harmonic energizing is what I amthinking of, but I ask about the concept generally -wrt this 'current' event ... :).

enZo

23 hours ago · Like

oSubmit

Roo Reindeer

Vincent:"Could it be..." Yes, the whistlers (natural ones) are almostcertainly influenced in their ground effects by dayand night ionosphere differences. But I don't knowthe details."F1/F2" density modulation is both the target andthe consequence of HAARP. But what part of whatwe see is natuarally modulated and what part isthe result of HAARP is a good question.

"Note: this is..."The 2 interleaved periods could well be the resultof mixing reflections from 2 points or layers. Butthe source of the original signal is localizedsomehow, because only KONO (pretty muchopposite HAARP in longitude) seemed to pick thoseup. If the original source was solar they should (itwould seem) be detectable with the same pattern(at different times) from many stations. But I admitthe source can not be "proved" to be HAARP withthe evidence we have on those signals only. It just

looks like the most probable source to those of usin the choir who already agree with the preacherscontention that HARRP is messing with thingsbased on the whole picture.

"Could something..."OUTSTANDING, I LOVE IT!! What a concept!! You get RCHs Bingo award for that one.The sun-earth-ionosphere-HAARP system as onebig beam antenna. (That should have been MY idea, damn it :-) That is really not a stretch at allbut a most natural way to look at it (in 20/20hindsight). It clarifies one very easy way in whichHAARP could modulate natural solar energy influx




November 4, 2010

and manipulate it without the need to actuallygenerate the power needed to bring about theeffects desired. As I postulated earlier, HAARPcould take advantage of solar events and "channel"that energy in the direction desired rather thentrying to do all the work itself (hard to explain if multi gigawatt power levels are required to bringabout global effects). The question of how to dosuch a thing was an open one but your beamantenna concept fits the bill there. The devil is inthe details, but that is a most promising concept.

The key is PARAMETRIC AMPLIFICATION (google

that).When the "parameters" of a dynamic system arealtered by the state of that system itself you getnonliner feedback. Time it right and you get anamplifier. This is general to ALL dynamic systemsfrom a childs swing (thats how you can "pump"yourself up) to microwave amplifiers to...earth/ion/haarp/sun. The sun provides the mainpower, tweeking the ionosphere "reflectors anddirectors" (the parameters of the system) withHAARP as the waves travel back and forth allowsamplification. Multiple HAARP sources allowgeometric control of the point where the amplifiedenergy gets focused.

WOW that looks EASY :-)In all seriousness. That concept WOULD allowdirect modulation of impacting solar energy on aplanet wide scale.THIS NEEDS A PATENT!If you have a lawyer, get in touch with him. Thiscould be better then HAARP or if it turns out theyhave been doing so any litigation would bust them.

To deny the patent they would have to prove theyare already doing it, possibly with a secret patent. Actually DOING it just reduces to 'time & money".THE PHYSICS IS ACTUALLY SIMPLE. (well.. asthese things go :-)

I HAVE been asleep at the switch. I should havebeen thinking "Parametric Amplification" all along.It is natures way of building shit up during manynatural processes. It's a very efficient way to dothings. Which is why it often occurs spontaneouslyin nature. Just give a system a "chance" to indulgein "PA" and it tends to do so. When you "force" it inthat direction you just help it go in a naturally

tending direction. This is perfect.

Whoa... got off the beam there (no pun intended)on that brainstorm. Back to the reply...

Are the URLs for the Ionic & sat data you aretalking about these ones?http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/ace/ace_rtsw_data.htmlhttp://www2.nict.go.jp/y/y223/simulation/realtime/index_ae.html

21 hours ago · Like · 1 person

oSubmit

Roo Reindeer

Reply to "For sport..." Yes ot may be possible to hijack such a system. Butif it were being used against you you can always"break it". So I don't think there would be anychance of long term use by "unauthorized"personnel.It would pretty much be a one shot deal. You coulduse it once for your own benefit but doing so andreveiling your capability would tip off the enemy. If we had actually been at war with Russia and foundthem using our system I would think we wouldhave destroyed it rather then let them use it fortheir advantage.


oSubmit

Nellie Moore Wow Roo! I'm can't wait to hearwhat is next with this.


oSubmit




November 4, 2010

Roo Reindeer Nellie:What's next ?Perhaps, for me, a one way ticket to Gitmo.Maybe I should be more discreet in my"speculations" :-D


oSubmit

Nellie Moore

I had not thought of that = ) However it did occurto me that you might be getting a phone callbecause someone wants to hire you (and or Vincent too) to either create this or be a part of theteam that is already working with it. . .

They do say discretion is the better part of valorhowever in these times discretion could lead to thelast one in is a rotten egg and we all need to be inon what is going on. Thanks for you wisdom!


oSubmit

Roo Reindeer Well Vincent that's trouble makeingpoint number 10.To add to the nine I spoke about in the privateemail a while back about our "friends" ST and PN :-)BTW "Steve Allen" seems to be back.


oSubmit

Roo Reindeer

Santa loves me.Look what I got in my email 10 minutes after theseposts.http://www.photonicsonline.com/product.mvc/Gaus

sian-Mirrors-0002?user=2366236&source=nl%3A29149

If the ionosphere was to have it's reflectivityaltered in a patterned manner, similar in concept tothese mirrors....!!With real time modification available... ??Why does this stuff turn up at just the right time :-)


oSubmit

Vincenzo Cataldi

Roo :

What a team we (all) make - my concepts come asfoggy concepts discovered through dreams via all-too-short Cat-naps - and honestly, without yourencouragement and validation, and vocabulary - Imight dismiss these as too far out there, pie in thesky ... :)

no wonder Tesla was 'naturally driven' to suchexperimentation : modulation-match (HARP) thesystems' impedance to the load (ionosphere/sun) :unless that is stated in reverse (dyslexic gift) !

I am reading still for the more subtle implications,and next your gift from Santa, then other link youprovided, so: -----> Stay Tuned ... :)

but I Again : Thank You Roo : most would gag on

yagi humor :---------------------------------------------------------------- Yagi-Uda antennahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yagi-Uda_antenna

A Yagi-Uda Antenna, commonly known simply as a Yagi antenna or Yagi, is a directional antennasystem[1] consisting of an array of a dipole andadditional closely coupled parasitic elements(usually a reflector and one or more directors). Thedipole in the array is driven, and another element,typically 5% longer, effectively operates as a




November 4, 2010

reflector. Other parasitic elements shorter than thedipole may be added in front of the dipole and arereferred to as directors. This arrangementincreases antenna directionality and gain in thepreferred direction over a single dipole. Directionalantennas such as the Yagi-Uda are commonlyreferred to as beam antennas or high-gainantennas (particularly for transmitting). Yagiantennas with added corner reflectors and/or UHFelements are commonly used for reception of television broadcasts. Yagi-Uda antennas are alsowidely used by amateur radio operators forcommunication on frequencies from short wave,

through VHF/UHF, and into microwave bands. Amateur radio operators (hams) often homebrewthis type of antenna, and have published manytechnical papers and software.----------------------------------------------------------------Dipole antennahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antenna

A dipole antenna, is a radio antenna that can bemade by a simple wire, with a center-fed drivenelement. These antennas are the simplest practicalantennas from a theoretical point of view; thecurrent amplitude on such an antenna decreasesuniformly from maximum at the center to zero atthe ends. Dipole antennas were created by HeinrichRudolph Hertz around 1886 in his experiments onelectromagnetic radiation.----------------------------------------------------------------[ Atten: Chief, R U connected (silently) into this ? ]

Roo stated :

"WOW that looks EASY :-)In all seriousness. That concept WOULD allowdirect modulation of impacting solar energy on aplanet wide scale.THIS NEEDS A PATENT!"

[ Atten: Patent Lawyer wanted for 'sky-high profits']----------------------------------------------------------------


oSubmit

Roo Reindeer

Vincent: As a further idea along the same lines:The basic idea of the parametric amplifier involvesvarying the reactance of the system at asubharmonic of the power source.If periodic fluctuations in the solar wind (the powersource) were to impinge on the ionosphere with aperiod of (for the sake of argument) 6 hours and

you were to use HAARP to heat and alter theheight (and subsequent capacitance with respect toground) of the ionosphere, which EVERYONEassociated with HAARP admits it can do, then thepower of the solar wind will couple to theionosphere if the modulating period were set to 12hours. You don't need gigawatts from HAARP. That(actually terawatts probably) comes from the sun.HARRP just facilitates the transfer to theionosphere in a controlled manner.

Treating the whole system as a "lumpedparameter" amplifier is of course a simplification. Inactuallity it is large with respect to the wavelengthsinvolved so must be treated as a "distributedparameter" system. This is analogous to thetransition from "LC" (inductance-capacitance)circuits to continuous transmission lines. But theprinciples remain the same. With the addedadvantage that you can use the "continuous"nature of the system to geometrically distribute theamplification. In a spherical geometry the mathgets grand. If I had a year or two or so I might be

able to come up with something realistic :-) interms of details. But someone who specializes inthis sort of thing, with the right software, could doit in a couple of weeks. It really is NOT "difficult"...if you know what you are doing :-).

Of course to utilize this process you have to beaware of the nature of the solar wind used as apower source. You would have to either be able topredict the fluctuations in advance from firstprinciples or have satellites in orbit around the sunto measure it's flux and "radio ahead" so you willknow whats coming and can adjust your modulatoracordingly.




November 4, 2010

Which is just what solar observing satellites do.Give us a heads up on solar activity before it hitsus.

Also you must have knowledge of the physics of the ionosphere so you can accurately predict thenature of the variations that you will induce in itwith a HAARP signal of a given type.

This is indeed the whole point of HAARP accordingto public staements: IE study the physics of theionosphere and in particular it's response to

electromagnetic stimulation.If you know what the sun is doing and you knowhow to tweek the ionosphere to put it in sync withthe sun you have a system that will let you use thesuns power to jack the ionosphere.

With multiple transmitters in a phased array aroundthe globe you can arrange to distribute the resultsof this solar energy coupling in a preset manner.Coupling the power of the solar wind in a directedmanner to the point of your choice.

Because the frequencies involved are so low thewavelengths are long and the whole earth iseffectively transparent to them. Thus a point in theinterior of the earth can be a focal point as well asa point on the surface.

STIR & FRY.

Now I am thinking here in terms of good oldMaxwellian EM waves with no bells and whistles. I

naturally think in those terms as the result of manyyears playing with electronics. However everthinghere is based only on wave motion. It hasNOTHING to do with the nature of the wavesthemselve. It applies to sound, electromagnetism,torsional, or whatever. The basic idea is the same.Sound waves couple to matter differently then EMwaves so the FINAL RESULT will vary at the targetfor example. Likewise "acoustic" waves on the sunwill not couple at all through the vacuum of space.But the basic operating idea of coupling, parametricamplification and phased array targeting isuniversal to all wave phenomenon.

Depending on the nature of the actual waves yourmilage may vary.

So it would be nice if SOMEONE out there withsome SOLID info on the EXACT nature of Torsionalwaves and their interaction with matter would givesome hints about this :-D


oSubmit

Roo Reindeer

Thanks to you Vincent for the seminal idea.I just wrote this stuff out in the last few minuteswithout any real deep thinking about it. It is allvery basic to me from the standpoint of theunderlying principles. I spoke about using HAARP inthat manner (as a solar power modulator) beforebut it was in the abstact without any realconsideration of how it might really work.

But I never would have thought of the "parametricamplifier" concept being applicable in this situationwithout your conceptualization of the system interms of the idea of an "active yagi".

Now it seems trivially obvious! With governmentmoney and decades of time it would seem unlikelythat it has NOT been done. These ideas werebound to have occurred before to people whospend their life working on this kind of stuff.

Then just a few minutes later that link aboutpatterned reflectors shows up in my email. Thatwould apply too as far as directing the energy.

Amazing syncronicity & serendipity!


oSubmit

Roo Reindeer




November 4, 2010

OH BTWOne last tidbit for now. In many applications whereyou have intersecting beams of various sortstargeted to the interior of an object with the intentof causing damage (ultrasonic for kidney stones, x-rays for tumours etc in medicine) the individualbeams passing through the surface are weak andcause no action. It is only where they all cometogether at the common focus that they havedestructive capacity. So if large numbers of weak beams were being sent through the surface of theearth with the intent of exciting earthquakes orvolcanoes at a subsuface fault or magma chamber

the individual weak beams would not be noticebleto a casual search.Only the resultant effect.

BUT... could those damn weird slow waves be signsof the weak beams? If so we know their locationand timing at the moment they are breaking thesurface and setting off the seismos!

THE question then is: can the focal point bedetermined from this data?Do EQs or volcanoes then follow shortly with anepicenter near these points?

Finally a possible causal link that CAN be tracked!What ya think?


oSubmit

Roo Reindeer NOTE: To clarify"Do EQs or volcanoes then follow shortly with anepicenter near these points?"By "...near these points" I meant the calculatedfocal points.Not the surface points where we see the slowwaves.


Documents

Roo Notes on HARpO