23
D + Leptonic and D 0 Semileptonic Decays First Results from BESIII Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering University of Minnesota

Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

  • Upload
    lida

  • View
    44

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

D + Leptonic and D 0 Semileptonic Decays First Results from BESIII. Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering University of Minnesota. Window on Weak and Strong Physics. Leptonic Decay. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

D+ Leptonic and D0 Semileptonic Decays First Results from BESIII

Ron PolingSchool of Physics and Astronomy

College of Science and EngineeringUniversity of Minnesota

Page 2: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 2

Window on Weak and Strong Physics

• Decay constant fD incorporates the strong interaction effects (wave function at the origin)

• Use charm leptonic decays to validate theory (LQCD) and apply to B mixing, which requires fB

• Multiple tests with charm: fD, fDs (esp. ratios)• Sensitivity to New Physics

5 July 2012

Leptonic Decay

Page 3: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 3

Window on Weak and Strong Physics

• Use Strong Interaction theory (LQCD) for form factor, extract CKM

• Use other measurements and unitarity for CKM and test theory

• Theoretical uncertainties can be reduced in determinations of |Vub| if FF calculations can be validated with charm

• Multiple tests available, semileptonic D decays to pseudoscalar mesons are cleanest

5 July 2012

Semileptonic Decay

Page 4: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 4

Window on Weak and Strong Physics

• Widths of mixing and |Vub| bands will be reduced as charm validates LQCD

• Long-term goal: Over-constrain CKM and search for New Physics

5 July 2012

Page 5: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Charm Physics at Threshold

5 July 2012 Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 5

• At ψ(3770) charm production is and• Fully reconstruct about 15% of D decays

• Hadronic tag on one side gives “beam” of D0 or D+ on the other side for leptonic/semileptonic studies. Neutrino is reconstructed from missing energy and momentum

Page 6: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 6

BESIII at BEPCII

• Comparable capabilities to CLEO-c, plus muon ID• The big advantage: BEPCII is a two-ring machine designed for charm

– Design (achieved) luminosity at ψ(3770): 1 (0.65) x 1033

5 July 2012

Page 7: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 7

BESIII Data

5 July 2012

• World’s largest ψ(3770) sample

• Tools/techniques for precision charm physics still under development – all results are PRELIMINARY– analysis is “partially blind” – 0.92 fb-1

analyzed so far. Full 2.9 fb-1 later for final results

Page 8: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 8

- Tag Selection

• Nine D- tag modes

5 July 2012

BESIII Preliminary

Page 9: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 20125 July 2012 9

425 signal candidates: small BG, mom. dist.consistent with

BESIII Preliminary

BESIII Preliminary

• Exactly one track in addition to tag, with the right charge

• Positive muon identification• No extra photon• Select on consistency with

leptonic decay:

- Signal Selection

Page 10: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 105 July 2012

• Positive muon ID requirement reduces background at the expense of a ~20% efficiency loss

- Sample Events

Page 11: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 115 July 2012

MC BG est.: Indep. data est.:

MCBESIII Preliminary

- Backgrounds

Page 12: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 125 July 2012

• Excellent agreement with CLEO-c• Still statistics limited – need more data!

BESIII Preliminary

- Results

Page 13: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 135 July 2012

LQCD (HPQCD 2012)

LQCD (FNAL/MILC 2012)

(208.3±1.0±3.3) MeV

(219±11) MeV

- Comparisons (from G. Rong)

Page 14: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 14

• Four D0 tag modes

5 July 2012

- Tag Selection

Page 15: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 20125 July 2012 15

• Tag plus exactly two oppositely-charged tracks

• Kaon/pion/electron ID• Electron has right charge • No extra neutral energy• Select on consistency with

semileptonic decay

BESIII Preliminary

BESIII Preliminary

• Fit U distribution to extract yield

- Signal Selection

Page 16: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

5 July 2012 Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 16

• Systematic uncertainties are preliminary• Good consistency with CLEO-c, statistical precision is

comparable with only 1/3 data analyzed

BESIII Preliminary

- Branching Fraction

Page 17: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 20125 July 2012 17

• Partition D0 semileptonic candidates in bins of

• Fit U distribution in each q2 binBESIII Preliminary BESIII Preliminary

with

- q2 distribution

Page 18: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 20125 July 2012 18

• Points are data with statistical errors only• Curves are Fermilab/MILC (arXiv:1111.5471) with ±1σ

(statististical) bands

BESIII PreliminaryBESIII Preliminary

- Project f(q2)

Page 19: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 20125 July 2012 19

Simple Pole Model

Modified Pole Model

Series Expansion

Becher and Hill PLB 633, 61 (‘06)

Becirevic and Kaidalov PLB 478, 417 (‘00)

- FF Parameterizations

Page 20: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 20125 July 2012 20

- FF Fits

Page 21: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 20125 July 2012 21

• Reasonable consistency with CLEO-c, comparable precision with 2/3 of data still to analyze

BESIII Preliminary

- FF Results

Page 22: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 22

Future Charm Prospects at BESIII

• Finalize and on the 2.9 fb-1 ψ(3770) sample

• Extend to and other modes• Highlights of coming data runs:

2012-2013 ECM=4260 and 4360 MeV for “XYZ” studies (0.5 fb-1 each)

2013-2014 ECM=4170 MeV for Ds (~2.4 fb-1)

TBD Additional ψ(3770) data

5 July 2012

Page 23: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

5 July 2012 Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 23

Summary and Conclusions

• First results from the BESIII experiment have been presented on

• BESIII has arrived for precision charm physics, with more data and more measurements to come

– D0 Semileptonic Decays

– D+ Leptonic Decays