Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Soft contribution to the damping rate of a hard photon in a weakly magnetized
hot medium
Ritesh Ghosh,1, 2, ∗ Bithika Karmakar,1, 2, † and Munshi G Mustafa1, 2, ‡
1Theory Division, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics,
1/AF, Bidhannagar, Kolkata 700064, India
2Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushaktinagar,
Mumbai, Maharashtra 400094, India
We consider weakly magnetized hot QED plasma comprising electrons and positrons.
There are three distinct dispersive (longitudinal and two transverse) modes of a photon in a
thermomagnetic medium. At lowest order in the coupling constant, a photon is damped in
this medium via Compton scattering and pair creation process. We evaluate the damping
rate of hard photon by calculating the imaginary part of the each transverse dispersive modes
in a thermomagnetic QED medium. We note that one of the fermions in the loop of one-loop
photon self-energy is considered as soft and the other one is hard. Considering the resummed
fermion propagator in a weakly magnetized medium for the soft fermion and the Schwinger
propagator for hard fermion, we calculate the soft contribution to the damping rate of hard
photon. In weak field approximation the thermal and thermomagnetic contributions to
damping rate get separated out for each transverse dispersive mode. The total damping rate
for each dispersive mode in presence of magnetic field is found to be reduced than that of
the thermal one. This formalism can easily be extended to QCD plasma.
∗ [email protected]† [email protected]‡ [email protected]
arX
iv:1
911.
0074
4v2
[he
p-ph
] 7
Mar
202
0
2
I. INTRODUCTION
Astrophysical plasma is almost always immersed in magnetic field. Extreme, magnetized plasma
is found in interiors of neutron star, magnetospheres of magnetars and central engines of super-
novae and gamma ray bursts [1]. The propagation of photon through the hot magnetized plasma,
viz., electron-positron plasma (EPP), is of great interest. Because the magnetar phenomena are
found by analyzing the high-energy radiation detected at earth. Thus it is very important to have a
good understanding of the propagation of photon through the EPP. Furthermore, the phenomenon
of Faraday rotation i.e., change of polarization of photon while propagating through a medium
has been studied in Ref. [2] in a field theoretical viewpoint. This has also been detected in several
astrophysical objects [3]. Also high-intensity laser beams are used to create ultrarelativistic EPP
of temperature around 10 MeV [4]. This EPP may play an important role in various astrophysical
situations. Some properties of such plasma, viz., the equation of state, dispersion relation of collec-
tive plasma modes of photon and electron, damping rates, mean free paths, transport coefficients
and particle production rates, are studied using QED at finite temperature [5, 6].
On the other hand in noncentral heavy ion collisions, the magnetic field as high as (15− 20)m2π
can be generated [7] at LHC energies. After a few fm/c of the collision, the magnetic field strength 1
decreases to (1 − 2)m2π. The effect of magnetic field on the properties of the QCD matter [viz.
quark-gluon plasma(QGP)] and on the phase diagram of QCD is of great interest. Recently, several
studies have found the effect of magnetic catalysis [13–16], i.e., the enhancement of phase transition
temperature of QCD matter in presence of external magnetic field, whereas, some results of inverse
magnetic catalysis [17–25] have been reported. Various properties of QCD matter at weak coupling
in presence of magnetic field is being studied including the equation of state [26–28], transport
properties [29–31]. Modification of QCD Debye mass and the two point correlation functions of
quarks [32] and gluons [33–35] i.e., partons have been analyzed recently. Dilepton production rate
from a hot magnetized QCD plasma [12, 36–42] has been calculated. The photon is also considered
as a good probe of the QGP medium as photon only interacts electromagnetically. Thus, it comes
out of the hot QCD system without interacting much. The damping rate of the hard photon is
associated with the mean free path of photon [43] and hard photon production rate in QGP [44].
Damping rate of photon is related to the imaginary part of photon dispersion in the medium [45]
which is again related to the scattering crosssection of the process that we find by cutting the pho-
1 The initial magnitude of this magnetic field can be very high at the initial time of the heavy-ion collisions and
then it decreases very fast, being inversely proportional to the square of time [8, 9]. However for a different point
of view, see Refs. [10–12], where the time dependence of magnetic field is shown to be adiabatic due to the high
conductivity of the medium.
3
ton self-energy diagram [46]. In lowest order coupling constant, photons are damped by Compton
scattering and pair creation process. In case of low momentum transfer, the damping rate shows
infrared singularity. Thus one should consider the effective resummed propagator instead of bare
propagator for soft momentum of fermion. We will call this as the soft contribution to the damping
rate of photon. The hard contribution refers to the case where all the fermions in loop have momen-
tum order of or much greater than the system temperature T . Both soft and hard contributions
to the damping rate of hard photon in thermal medium have been calculated in Ref. [45]. The
dispersion relations of photon are modified for a hot magnetized medium [33]. So the damping rate
of photon will also get modified in a thermomagnetic medium. In this article we intend to compute
the soft contribution to the hard photon damping rate for a weakly magnetized hot medium in
one loop approximation of photon self-energy. In a thermomagnetic medium this would be a good
indicator as higher loop calculation contributing to higher order would be extremely involved.
We consider hard photon of momentum Pµ = (p0,p) where p = |p| � T in a relativistic
hot magnetized QED medium. To find the soft contribution of the damping rate we introduce
a separation scale Λ where eT � Λ � T (gT � Λ � T in case of QCD). In the soft part of
the damping rate, the contribution from soft loop momentum involving a fermion is taken into
account up to the separation scale Λ . Here we assume that the magnetic field strength is weak
i.e.,√eB < eT < T (
√qfB < gT < T for QCD). We use the recently obtained effective fermion
propagator [32] in presence of weak magnetic field for the soft fermion and Schwinger propagator
for the hard fermion in the loop. The Braaten-Pisarki-Yuan formalism [47] has been used here to
calculate the imaginary part of photon self-energy. Extension to the case of damping rate of hard
photon in weakly magnetized hot QCD medium is straightforward. We need to consider the loop
fermions as quark and antiquark in that case.
In Sec. II we describe the set up to calculate the photon damping rate associated with imaginary
part of photon self-energy. In Sec. III the self-energy is obtained in a weak field approximation.
The imaginary parts of various components of photon self-energy is obtained in Sec. IV. Results
are given in Sec. V. We conclude in Sec. VI.
II. SETUP
We consider plasma of electrons and positrons at temperature T . The z-axis of the lab frame
is oriented along the magnetic field. The general structure of the gauge boson self-energy and
corresponding effective propagator have been evaluated in Ref. [33]. The general covariant structure
4
of photon self-energy in a magnetized hot medium can be written as
Πµν = βBµν + σRµν + δQµν + αNµν , (1)
where various form factors can be written as
β = BµνΠµν ,
σ = RµνΠµν ,
δ = QµνΠµν ,
α =1
2NµνΠµν . (2)
The general covariant structure of photon propagator can be obtained [33] as
Dµν =ξPµPνP 4
+(P 2 − δ)Bµν
(P 2 − β)(P 2 − δ)− α2+
RµνP 2 − σ
+(P 2 − β)Qµν
(P 2 − β)(P 2 − δ)− α2
+αNµν
(P 2 − β)(P 2 − δ)− α2. (3)
We note that the thermal medium (absence of magnetic field) has two dispersive modes of photon
i.e., one degenerate transverse mode and one medium induced plasmon mode due to breaking of
boost invariance. Now breaking of rotational invariance in the presence of a magnetic field leads
to three dispersive modes of photon by lifting the degeneracy of the transverse modes. These three
dispersive modes can be seen from the pole of Eq. (3). Now, the dispersion relations can be written
as
P 2 − σ = 0, (4)
(P 2 − δ)(P 2 − β)− α2 =
(P 2 −
β + δ +√
(β − δ)2 + 4α2
2
)×(P 2 −
β + δ −√
(β − δ)2 + 4α2
2
)= 0 . (5)
In weak magnetic field approximation α does not contribute upto O[(eB)]2, one gets simple form
of the above dispersive modes [26]
P 2 − σ = 0,
P 2 − β = 0,
P 2 − δ = 0. (6)
Damping rate is defined as the imaginary part of photon dispersion relation. The medium induced
longitudinal (plasmon) mode does not contribute to the damping rate 2 and the dispersion relations
2 The longitudinal dispersive mode merges with the light cone at high photon momentum.
5
for two transverse modes of a photon are given, respectively, as
P 2 − σ = 0 , P 2 − δ = 0, (7)
Damping rates γδ(p) and γσ(p) (for no overdamping i .e. γi � p0 where i = δ, σ) of hard photon
are given by imaginary part of the form factors as [48]
γσ(p) = − 1
2pImσ(p0 = p), (8)
γδ(p) = − 1
2pIm δ(p0 = p). (9)
The tensor structures of Rµν and Qµν [33] are given as
Rµν =
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 −1 0
0 0 0 0
, Qµν =
0 0 0 0
0 − cos2 θp 0 sin θp cos θp
0 0 0 0
0 sin θp cos θp 0 − sin2 θp
. (10)
Using Eq.(10) in Eq.(2) we can write the form factors σ and δ in weak field approximation as
σ = −(
Π220 + Π22
2
), (11)
δ = − cos2 θp
(Π11
0 + Π112
)− sin2 θp
(Π33
0 + Π332
)+ 2 sin θp cos θp
(Π13
0 + Π132
). (12)
Combining Eq.(8) with Eq.(11) and Eq.(9) with Eq.(12), the damping rates become
γσ(p) =1
2p
(ImΠ22
0 + ImΠ222
), (13)
γδ(p) =1
2p
[cos2 θp
(ImΠ11
0 + ImΠ112
)+ sin2 θp
(Im Π33
0 + Im Π332
)−2 sin θp cos θp
(Im Π13
0 + Im Π132
) ](14)
The damping rates in Eqs.(13) and (14) can now be written as
γσ(p) = γth(p) + γBσ (p), (15)
γδ(p) = γth(p) + γBδ (p). (16)
where γth is the O[(eB)0] contribution or thermal contribution is given as
γth(p) =1
2pImΠ22
0 =1
2p
[cos2 θpImΠ11
0 + sin2 θpIm Π330 − 2 sin θp cos θpIm Π13
0
]. (17)
The thermomagnetic corrections of O[(eB)2] are given as
γBσ (p) =1
2pImΠ22
2 , (18)
γBδ (p) =1
2p
[cos2 θpImΠ11
2 + sin2 θpIm Π332 − 2 sin θp cos θpIm Π13
2
]. (19)
We need to obtain the imaginary parts of 11, 22, 33 and 13 components of the photon self-energy
Πµν which are computed in the following sections.
6
III. PHOTON SELF-ENERGY IN HOT MAGNETIZED MEDIUM
The photon self-energy as shown in Fig. 1 can be written as
Πµν(P ) = ie2
∫d4K
(2π)4
{Tr[γµS
∗(K)γνS(Q)] + Tr[γνS∗(K)γµS(Q)]
}. (20)
where S∗(K) is effective electron propagator and S(K) is Schwinger propagator for bare electron.
As the external photon is hard, we consider one bare and one effective fermion propagator in the
loop. In the following we would obtain the propagators for fermion.
P
K
Q=K−P
FIG. 1: Photon self-energy where the blob represents the effective electron propagator in
magnetic field and double line represents bare electron propagator in magnetic field
A. Fermion propagator in weak field approximation
In the weak magnetic field limit, i.e.,√eB < mth ∼ eT < T the Schwinger propagator for
fermion can be written up to O[(eB)2] as [49]
S(K) =/K +mf
K2 −m2f
+ iγ1γ2 /Kq +mf
(K2 −m2f )2
(eB) + 2
[{(K · u) /u− (K · n) /n} − /K
(K2 −m2f )3
−k2⊥(/K +mf )
(K2 −m2f )4
](eB)2
+ O[(eB)3
]= S0 + S1 + S2 +O[(eB)3]. (21)
The general form of fermion self-energy in a weakly magnetized medium can be written as [32]
Σ(K) = −a /K − b /u− b′γ5 /u− c′γ5 /n . (22)
In one loop order, the form factors are given as
a(k0, k) = −m2
th
k2Q1
(k0
k
), (23)
b(k0, k) =m2
th
k
[k0
kQ1
(k0
k
)−Q0
(k0
k
)], (24)
b′(k0, k) = 4e2M2(T,mf , eB)k3
k2Q1
(k0
k
), (25)
7
c′(k0, k) = 4e2M2(T,mf , eB)1
kQ0
(k0
k
), (26)
where Legendre function of second kind are given as
Q0(x) =1
2ln
(x+ 1
x− 1
), (27)
Q1(x) = xQ0(x)− 1, (28)
and the thermomagnetic mass is given as
M2(T,mf , eB) =eB
16π2
[ln 2− πT
2mf
], (29)
whereas thermal mass is given as
m2th =
1
8e2T 2 . (30)
The effective fermion propagator can be written [32] as
S∗(K) = P−/L(K)
L2P+ + P+
/R(K)
R2P−
= S∗L(K) + S∗R(K), (31)
where chirality projection operators are given by
P± =1
2(1± γ5), (32)
and Lµ and Rµ are given as
Lµ = (1 + a)Kµ + (b+ b′)uµ + c′nµ, (33)
Rµ = (1 + a)Kµ + (b− b′)uµ − c′nµ. (34)
For simplicity of calculation we expand the effective fermion propagator in Eq. (31) in powers
of eB and keep terms up to O[(eB)2] as
S∗(K) = S∗0(K) + S∗1(K) + S∗2(K) +O[(eB)3], (35)
where S∗0(K) is O[(eB)0] and given as
S∗0(K) =(1 + a) /K + b /u
D2=
(1 + a) /K + b /u
D+D−, (36)
where D± = (1 + a)(k0 ∓ k) + b.
Equation (36) is the effective HTL fermion propagator [50, 51] in thermal medium. The O[(eB)]
is obtained as
S∗1(K) =1
D4
[2(1 + a)/Kγ5
{− (1 + a)k3 c
′ − (1 + a)k0 b′ − bb′
}
8
+ /uγ5
{((1 + a)2K2 − b2
)b′ − 2(a+ 1)bc′ k3
}+ c′/nγ5
{(2(1 + a)k0 + b
)b+ (a+ 1)2K2
}], (37)
whereas O[(eB)2] is obtained as
S∗2(K) =
[(2b′{
(1 + a)k0 + b}
+ 2c′k3(1 + a))2
D6− b′2 − c′2
D4
]{(1 + a) /K + b /u
}
−
(2b′{
(1 + a)k0 + b}
+ 2c′k3(1 + a))(b′ /u+ c′ /n
)D4
=
(h2(k0, k⊥, k3)
D6− h′
D4
){(1 + a) /K + b /u
}− h(k0, k⊥, k3)
D4
(b′ /u+ c′ /n
), (38)
where h = 2b′{
(1 + a)k0 + b}
+ 2c′k3(1 + a) and h′ = b′2 − c′2.
B. Photon self-energy in weak magnetic field
Now the O[(eB)0] contribution of Πµν given in Eq. (20) can be written as
Πµν0 = ie2
∫d4K
(2π)4
{Tr[γµS
∗0(K)γνS0(Q)] + Tr[γνS
∗0(K)γµS0(Q)]
}= ie2
∫d4K
(2π)4
{Tr
[γµ(γ0 − ~γ · k
2D++γ0 + ~γ · k
2D−
)γν(f
(1)0 γ0 − f (0)
0 ~γ · ~q)]
+ Tr
[γν(γ0 − ~γ · k
2D++γ0 + ~γ · k
2D−
)γµ(f
(1)0 γ0 − f (0)
0 ~γ · ~q)]}
= 8ie2
∫d4K
(2π)4
(1 + a){(KµQν +KνQµ
)− gµνK ·Q
}+ b
{(Qµuν +Qνuµ
)− gµνQ · u
}D+D−Q2
,
(39)
where
f(1)0 =
q0
Q2, f
(0)0 =
1
Q2,
f(1)1 =
q0
Q4, f
(0)1 =
1
Q4. (40)
The O[(eB)] contribution of Πµν is given as
Πµν1 = ie2
∫d4K
(2π)4
{Tr[γµS
∗0(K)γνS1(Q)] + Tr[γνS
∗0(K)γµS1(Q)]
+ Tr[γµS∗1(K)γνS0(Q)] + Tr[γνS
∗1(K)γµS0(Q)]
}, (41)
which becomes zero.
9
The O[(eB)2] contribution of Πµν is given as
Πµν2 = ie2
∫d4K
(2π)4
{Tr[γµS
∗1(K)γνS1(Q)] + Tr[γνS
∗1(K)γµS1(Q)] + Tr[γµS
∗0(K)γνS2(Q)]
+ Tr[γνS∗0(K)γµS2(Q)] + Tr[γµS
∗2(K)γνS0(Q)] + Tr[γνS
∗2(K)γµS0(Q)]
}. (42)
We calculate the above mentioned trace as follows. The trace of the first and second terms of
Eq. (42) can be calculated as
Tr[γµS∗1(K)γνS1(Q)] + Tr[γνS
∗1(K)γµS1(Q)]
=8 (eB)
D2(Q2 −m2
f
)2
[b′{
(uµnν + uνnµ)(Q · u)− 2uµuν(Q · n) + gµν(Q · n)}
+ c′{
2nµnν(Q · u)− (nµuν + nνuµ)(Q · n) + gµν(Q · u)}]− 8 (eB)
D4(Q2 −m2
f
)2
×
[h
{(1 + a
)(gµν(
(K · u)(Q · n)− (K · n)(Q · u))− (Kµuν +Kνuµ)Q · n
+ (Kµnν +Kνnµ)Q · u)
+ b
(gµνQ · n+ (uµnν + uνnµ)Q · u− 2uµuνQ · n
)}]. (43)
The trace of third and fourth terms in Eq. (42) can be obtained as
Tr[γµS∗0(K)γνS2(Q)] + Tr[γνS
∗0(K)γµS2(Q)]
=8(eB)2
D+(Q2 −m2f )3
[q0
(Kµg0ν + Kνg0µ − gµν
)− q3
(Kµg3ν + Kνg3µ − gµν k3
)−(KµQν + KνQµ − gµνK ·Q
)]−
8(eB)2q2⊥
D+(Q2 −m2f )4
[KµQν + KνQµ − gµνK ·Q
]+
8(eB)2
D−(Q2 −m2f )3
[q0
(K ′µg0ν + K ′νg0µ − gµν
)− q3
(K ′µg3ν + K ′νg3µ + gµν k3
)−(K ′µQν + K ′νQµ − gµνK ′ ·Q
)]−
8(eB)2q2⊥
D−(Q2 −m2f )4
[K ′µQν + K ′νQµ − gµνK ′ ·Q
], (44)
where K ′µ = (1,−k).
The trace of fifth and sixth terms in Eq. (42) are obtained as
Tr[γµS∗2(K)γνS0(Q)] + Tr[γνS
∗2(K)γµS0(Q)]
=8
(Q2 −m2f )
[( h2
D6− h′
D4
)(1 + a
)(KµQν +KνQµ − gµνK ·Q
)+(b( h2
D6− h′
D4
)− b′ h
D4
)×
(gµ0Qν + gν0Qµ − gµνq0
)− c′ h
D4
(gµ3Qν + gν3Qµ − gµνq3
)]. (45)
10
The photon self-energy in weak field approximation now can be decomposed using Eqs.(39),(41),(42)
as
Πµν(P ) = Πµν0 (P ) + Πµν
2 (P ), (46)
where the first term is a pure thermal(O[(eB)0]) contribution and second term is thermomagnetic
correction of O[(eB)2].
Now the O[(eB)0] expression of Π11 , Π22, Π33, and Π13 can be written from Eq. (39) as
Π110 (p0, p) = 8ie2
∫d4K
(2π)4
(1 + a)(k0q0 + 2k1q1 − ~k · ~q) + bq0{((1 + a)k0 + b
)2 − (1 + a)2k2}Q2
= −4e2∑∫ [(
f(1)0
D++f
(1)0
D−
)+(2k1q1 − k · q
) {f (0)0
D+− f
(0)0
D−
}],
Π220 (p0, p) = 8ie2
∫d4K
(2π)4
(1 + a)(k0q0 + 2k2q2 − ~k · ~q) + bq0{((1 + a)k0 + b
)2 − (1 + a)2k2}Q2
= −4e2∑∫ [(
f(1)0
D++f
(1)0
D−
)+(2k2q2 − k · q
) {f (0)0
D+− f
(0)0
D−
}],
Π330 (p0, p) = 8ie2
∫d4K
(2π)4
(1 + a)(k0q0 + 2k3q3 − ~k · ~q) + bq0{((1 + a)k0 + b
)2 − (1 + a)2k2}Q2
= −4e2∑∫ [(
f(1)0
D++f
(1)0
D−
)−(k · q − 2k3q3
) {f (0)0
D+− f
(0)0
D−
}],
Π130 (p0, p) = 8ie2
∫d4K
(2π)4
(1 + a)(k1q3 + q1k3){((1 + a)k0 + b
)2 − (1 + a)2k2}Q2
= −4e2∑∫ [
(k1q3 + q1k3)
{f
(0)0
D+− f
(0)0
D−
}]. (47)
Using Eqs.(42),(43),(44) and (45), one can write the O[(eB)2] expression of Π11 , Π22, Π33, and
Π13 as
Π112 = −e2
∑∫ [− 8eB
D2(Q2 −m2f )2
{b′q3 + c′q0
}+
8eB
D4(Q2 −m2f )2
h
{(1 + a)(k0q3 − k3q0) + bq3
}+
8(eB)2
D+(Q2 −m2f )3
(k2q2 − k1q1
)−
8(eB)2q2⊥
D+(Q2 −m2f )4
(q0 − k · q + 2k1q1
)− 8(eB)2
D−(Q2 −m2f )3
(k2q2 − k1q1
)−
8(eB)2q2⊥
D−(Q2 −m2f )4
(q0 + k · q − 2k1q1
)+
8
(Q2 −m2f )
{( h2
D6− h′
D4
)(1 + a)(2k1q1 +K ·Q) +
(b( h2
D6− h′
D4
)− b′h
D4
)q0
− c′h
D4q3
}], (48)
11
Π222 = −e2
∑∫ [− 8eB
D2(Q2 −m2f )2
{b′q3 + c′q0
}+
8eB
D4(Q2 −m2f )2
h
{(1 + a)(k0q3 − k3q0) + bq3
}+
8(eB)2
D+(Q2 −m2f )3
(k1q1 − k2q2
)−
8(eB)2q2⊥
D+(Q2 −m2f )4
(q0 − k · q + 2k2q2
)− 8(eB)2
D−(Q2 −m2f )3
(k1q1 − k2q2
)−
8(eB)2q2⊥
D−(Q2 −m2f )4
(q0 + k · q − 2k2q2
)+
8
(Q2 −m2f )
{( h2
D6− h′
D4
)(1 + a)(2k2q2 +K ·Q) +
(b( h2
D6− h′
D4
)− b′h
D4
)q0
− c′h
D4q3
}], (49)
Π332 = −e2
∑∫ [8eB
D2(Q2 −m2f )2
{− b′q3 + c′q0
}+
8eB
D4(Q2 −m2f )2
h
{(1 + a)(k0q3 + k3q0) + bq3
}+
8(eB)2
D+(Q2 −m2f )3
(− q3k3 + k · q
)−
8(eB)2q2⊥
D+(Q2 −m2f )4
(q0 − k · q + 2q3k3
)+
8(eB)2
D−(Q2 −m2f )3
(q3k3 − k · q
)−
8(eB)2q2⊥
D−(Q2 −m2f )4
(q0 + k · q − 2q3k3
)+
8
(Q2 −m2f )
{( h2
D6− h′
D4
)(1 + a)(2k3q3 +K ·Q) +
(b( h2
D6− h′
D4
)− b′h
D4
)q0
+c′h
D4q3
}], (50)
Π132 = −e2
∑∫ [8eB
D4(Q2 −m2f )2
h(1 + a)(k1q0)− 8(eB)2
D+(Q2 −m2f )3
k3q1 −8(eB)2q2
⊥D+(Q2 −m2
f )4
×(k1q3 + k3q1
)+
8(eB)2
D−(Q2 −m2f )3
k3q1 +8(eB)2q2
⊥D−(Q2 −m2
f )4
(k1q3 + k3q1
)+
8
(Q2 −m2f )
×{( h2
D6− h′
D4
)(1 + a)
(k1q3 + k3q1
)+c′h
D4q1
}]. (51)
IV. IMAGINARY PARTS OF THE COMPONENTS OF THE PHOTON SELF-ENERGY
Before obtaining the imaginary parts, we discuss below the various approximations used in this
calculation.
1. We have considered the momentum of photon as hard (p � T ). The momentum of soft
fermion k � T . Thus we can take the following approximations:
nF (ω) ∼ 1 , nF (p− ω) ∼ e−p/T , e−p/T ∼ 0. (52)
12
2. An upper cutoff Λ(< T ) of the soft fermion momentum k has been introduced in the inte-
grations.
3. We consider mf = mth for electron.
θ
x
y
z
k
p
φ
θp
FIG. 2: Choice of reference frame for computing the various components of photon self-energy.
The magnetic field is along z-direction and θp is the angle between momentum of photon and the
external magnetic field.
4. To perform the various integrations we choose a frame of reference as shown in Fig. 2 in
which the external momentum of the photon in xz plane with 0 < θp < π/2. So one can
write
~p ≡ (p sin θp, 0, p cos θp) , (53)
and then the loop momentum as
~k ≡ (k sin θ cosφ, k sin θ sinφ, k cos θ). (54)
In the following subsection we will obtain imaginary parts of various self-energy components.
A. Imaginary parts of the magnetic field independent part, i.e. O[(eB)0]
We evaluate the imaginary parts of Π110 , Π22
0 , Π330 , and Π13
0 using the Braaten-Pisarski-Yuan
method [45, 47].
13
Im Π110 = −4e2π(1− ep/T )
∫d3k
(2π)3
∫ ∞−∞
∫ ∞−∞
dω dω′nF (ω)nF (ω′)
{ρ
(1)0 (ω′)
(ρD+(ω)
+ ρD−(ω))−(k · q − 2k1q1
) (ρD+(ω)− ρD−(ω)
)ρ
(0)0 (ω′)
}δ(ω + ω′ − p), (55)
Im Π220 = −4e2π(1− ep/T )
∫d3k
(2π)3
∫ ∞−∞
∫ ∞−∞
dω dω′nF (ω)nF (ω′)
{ρ
(1)0 (ω′)
(ρD+(ω)
+ ρD−(ω))−(k · q − 2k2q2
) (ρD+(ω)− ρD−(ω)
)ρ
(0)0 (ω′)
}δ(ω + ω′ − p), (56)
Im Π330 = −4e2π(1− ep/T )
∫d3k
(2π)3
∫ ∞−∞
∫ ∞−∞
dω dω′nF (ω)nF (ω′)
{ρ
(1)0 (ω′)
(ρD+(ω)
+ ρD−(ω))−(k · q − 2k3q3
) (ρD+(ω)− ρD−(ω)
)ρ
(0)0 (ω′)
}δ(ω + ω′ − p), (57)
Im Π130 = −4e2π(1− ep/T )
∫d3k
(2π)3
∫ ∞−∞
∫ ∞−∞
dω dω′nF (ω)nF (ω′)
{(k1q3 + q1k3)
×(ρD+(ω)− ρD−(ω)
)ρ
(0)0 (ω′)
}δ(ω + ω′ − p), (58)
where ρ(0)0 , ρ
(1)0 , ρ
(0)1 , ρ
(1)1 , ρD+ and ρD− are spectral representation of f
(0)0 , f
(1)0 , f
(0)1 , f
(1)1 , 1/D+ and
1/D− respectively. These spectral functions are obtained in Appendix A. We know that both ρD+
and ρD− have pole containing the mass shell δ-function + Landau cut part in space like region
whereas ρ(0)0 , ρ
(1)0 , ρ
(0)1 , ρ
(1)1 have only pole containing the mass shell δ function. Since imaginary
parts of various components of the self-energy contain the product of two spectral functions, it
would then have the pole-pole and the pole-cut contributions.
The pole-pole parts of ImΠ11, ImΠ22, ImΠ33 and ImΠ13 contain δ(p− ω± − q) where ω± is the
energy of the fermion quasiparticle, ~k and ~q = ~k − ~p are the momenta of soft and hard fermion,
respectively. Hence ω± > k. The δ-function yields
p− ω± − q = 0
cosφ ≈ ω±/k − cos θ cos θpsin θ sin θp
.
The value ofω±/k−cos θ cos θp
sin θ sin θpexcludes the range [−1, 1] for all values of the parameters θ and θp
. This restriction is valid for both thermal and the magnetic case. Thus pole-pole parts do not
contribute in this calculation [44, 45]. In O[(eB)0] the contribution comes only from the pole-cut
part.
14
1. Pole-cut part of O[(eB)0]
Now we would find the pole-cut part of the above self-energy components in Eqs.(55), (56), (57)
and (58) as
Im Π110
∣∣∣∣pole−cut
= 2e2π(1− ep/T )
∫d3k
(2π)3
∫ ∞−∞
∫ ∞−∞
dω dω′nF (ω)nF (ω′)
{δ(ω′ − q)Θ(k2 − ω2)
×(β+(ω) + β−(ω)
)− 1
q(k · q − 2k1q1)δ(ω′ − q)Θ(k2 − ω2)
(β+(ω)− β−(ω)
)}× δ(p− ω − ω′),
= −e2π
∫ Λ
0
k2dk
2π2
∫ π
0
1
2sin θ dθ
∫ 2π
0
dφ
2π
∫ k
−kdω
{(β+(ω) + β−(ω)
)− 1
q(k · q − 2k1q1)
×(β+(ω)− β−(ω)
)}δ(p− ω − q), (59)
Im Π220
∣∣∣∣pole−cut
= 2e2π(1− ep/T )
∫d3k
(2π)3
∫ ∞−∞
∫ ∞−∞
dω dω′nF (ω)nF (ω′)
{δ(ω′ − q)Θ(k2 − ω2)
×(β+(ω) + β−(ω)
)− 1
q(k · q − 2k2q2)δ(ω′ − q)Θ(k2 − ω2)
(β+(ω)− β−(ω)
)}× δ(p− ω − ω′)
= −e2π
∫ Λ
0
k2dk
2π2
∫ π
0
1
2sin θ dθ
∫ 2π
0
dφ
2π
∫ k
−kdω
{(β+(ω) + β−(ω)
)− 1
q(k · q − 2k2q2)
×(β+(ω)− β−(ω)
)}δ(p− ω − q), (60)
Im Π330
∣∣∣∣pole−cut
= 2e2π(1− ep/T )
∫d3k
(2π)3
∫ ∞−∞
∫ ∞−∞
dω dω′nF (ω)nF (ω′)
{δ(ω′ − q)Θ(k2 − ω2)
×(β+(ω) + β−(ω)
)− 1
q(k⊥q⊥ − k3q3)δ(ω′ − q)Θ(k2 − ω2)
(β+(ω)− β−(ω)
)}× δ(p− ω − ω′)
= −e2π
∫ Λ
0
k2dk
2π2
∫ π
0
1
2sin θ dθ
∫ 2π
0
dφ
2π
∫ k
−kdω
{(β+(ω) + β−(ω)
)− 1
q(k⊥q⊥ − k3q3)
×(β+(ω)− β−(ω)
)}δ(p− ω − q), (61)
15
Im Π130
∣∣∣∣pole−cut
= 2e2π(1− ep/T )
∫d3k
(2π)3
∫ ∞−∞
∫ ∞−∞
dω dω′nF (ω)nF (ω′)
{k1q3 + q1k3
qδ(ω′ − q)
×(β+(ω)− β−(ω)
)Θ(k2 − ω2)
}δ(p− ω − ω′)
= −e2π
∫ Λ
0
k2dk
2π2
∫ π
0
1
2sin θ dθ
∫ 2π
0
dφ
2π
∫ k
−kdω
1
q
(k1q3 + q1k3
)(β+(ω)− β−(ω)
)× δ(p− ω − q).
(62)
Here we note that the terms with δ(ω′ + q) δ(p − ω − ω′) Θ(k2 − ω2) will not contribute because
k2 − (p+ q)2 can not be greater than zero. So we have excluded those terms.
B. Imaginary part of magnetic field dependent part of O[(eB)2]
Similar to O[(eB)0] case, the imaginary part of Π112 , Π22
2 , Π332 and Π13
2 can be written as
Im Π112 = −8e2π(1− ep/T )
∫d3k
(2π)3
∫ ∞−∞
∫ ∞−∞
dω dω′nF (ω)nF (ω′)
×[eB{q3 ρ
(0)1
(ρ
(1)9 + ρ10 − ρ7
)− ρ(1)
1
(ρ8 + k3 ρ
(0)9
)}+ (eB)2
(k1q1 − k2q2
)ρ
(0)2
×(ρD− − ρD+
)− (eB)2q2
⊥
{ρ
(1)3
(ρD+ + ρD−
)+ (2k1q1 − k · q)ρ(0)
3
(ρD+ − ρD−
)}+ ρ
(1)0
(ρ
(1)15 − ρ
(1)14 + ρ16 − ρ13 − ρ11
)+ (2k1 q1 − ~k · ~q)ρ(0)
0
(ρ
(0)15 − ρ
(0)14
)− q3 ρ
(0)0 ρ12
]× δ(p− ω − ω′),
(63)
Im Π222 = −8e2π(1− ep/T )
∫d3k
(2π)3
∫ ∞−∞
∫ ∞−∞
dω dω′nF (ω)nF (ω′)
×[eB{q3 ρ
(0)1
(ρ
(1)9 + ρ10 − ρ7
)− ρ(1)
1
(ρ8 + k3 ρ
(0)9
)}+ (eB)2
(k2 q2 − k1q1
)ρ
(0)2
×(ρD− − ρD+
)− (eB)2q2
⊥
{ρ
(1)3
(ρD+ + ρD−
)+ (2k2 q2 − k · q)ρ(0)
3
(ρD+ − ρD−
)}+ ρ
(1)0
(ρ
(1)15 − ρ
(1)14 + ρ16 − ρ13 − ρ11
)+ (2k2 q2 − ~k · ~q)ρ(0)
0
(ρ
(0)15 − ρ
(0)14
)− q3 ρ
(0)0 ρ12
]× δ(p− ω − ω′),
(64)
Im Π332 = −8e2π(1− ep/T )
∫d3k
(2π)3
∫ ∞−∞
∫ ∞−∞
dω dω′nF (ω)nF (ω′)
16
×[eB{q3 ρ
(0)1
(ρ
(1)9 + ρ10 − ρ7
)+ ρ
(1)1
(ρ8 + k3 ρ
(0)9
)}+ (eB)2
(q3k3 − k · q
)ρ
(0)2
×(ρD− − ρD+
)− (eB)2q2
⊥
{ρ
(1)3
(ρD+ + ρD−
)+ (2q3 k3 − k · q)ρ(0)
3
(ρD+ − ρD−
)}+ ρ
(1)0
(ρ
(1)15 − ρ
(1)14 + ρ16 − ρ13 − ρ11
)+ (2k3 q3 − ~k · ~q)ρ(0)
0
(ρ
(0)15 − ρ
(0)14
)+ q3 ρ
(0)0 ρ12
]× δ(p− ω − ω′),
(65)
Im Π132 = −8e2π(1− ep/T )
∫d3k
(2π)3
∫ ∞−∞
∫ ∞−∞
dω dω′nF (ω)nF (ω′)
×[eB{ρ
(1)1 k3 ρ
(0)9
}+ (eB)2 k3 q1ρ
(0)2
{ρD− − ρD+
}− (eB)2q2
⊥
{(k1q3 + k3q1)ρ
(0)3
×(ρD+ − ρD−
)}+ (k1q3 + k3q1)ρ
(0)0
(ρ
(0)15 − ρ
(0)14
)+ q1 ρ
(0)0 ρ12
]δ(p− ω − ω′). (66)
Various spectral functions are obtained in Appendix A. As discussed before we also note that the
imaginary part of various components of the self-energy contain the pole-pole and the pole-cut
contributions. As explained earlier the phase space does not allow the pole-pole part to contribute
in this order. In O[(eB)2] the contribution comes only from the pole-cut part.
1. Pole-cut part of O[(eB)2]
Now the expressions of pole-cut parts of Eqs. (63), (64), (65) and (66) after using the approxi-
mations, are given below:
Im Π112
∣∣∣pole−cut
= 4e2π
∫ Λ
0
k2dk
2π2
∫1
2sin θ dθ
∫dφ
2π
∫ k
−kdω
∫ ∞−∞
dω′[δ′′′(ω′ − ωq)
{−
(eB)2q2⊥
96ω3q
×(β+ + β−
)−
(eB)2q2⊥(2k1q1 − k · q)
96ω4q
(β+ − β−
)}− δ′′(ω′ − ωq)
{3(eB)2
64ω3q
×(q2⊥ (k1q1 − k · q)
ω2q
− (k1q1 − k2q2))×(β+ − β−
)+
3(eB)2q2⊥
128ω4q
(β+ + β−
)}+ δ′(ω′ − ωq)
{eB q3
4ω2q
(β
(1)9 + β10 − β7
)− eB
4ωq
(β8 + k3 β
(0)9
)− (eB)2
16ω4q
(k2q2 − k1q1
+5q2⊥(k1q1 − k · q)
2ω2q
)(β+ − β−
)−
(eB)2q2⊥
32ω5q
(β+ + β−
)}+ δ(ω′ − ωq)
{eB q3
4ω3q
×(β
(1)9 + β10 − β7
)− (eB)2
16ω5q
(3k2q2 − 3k1q1 +
5q2⊥ (k1q1 − k · q)
2ω2q
)(β+ − β−
)− 1
2
(β
(1)15 + β16 −
(β
(1)14 + β11 + β13
))− (2k1q1 − ~k · ~q )
2ωq
(β
(0)15 − β
(0)14
)+
q3
2ωqβ12
}]
17
× δ(p− ω − ω′), (67)
Im Π222
∣∣∣pole−cut
= 4e2π
∫ Λ
0
k2dk
2π2
∫1
2sin θ dθ
∫dφ
2π
∫ k
−kdω
∫ ∞−∞
dω′[δ′′′(ω′ − ωq)
{−
(eB)2q2⊥
96ω3q
×(β+ + β−
)−
(eB)2q2⊥(2k2q2 − k · q)
96ω4q
(β+ − β−
)}− δ′′(ω′ − ωq)
{3(eB)2
64ω3q
×(q2⊥ (k2q2 − k · q)
ω2q
− (k2q2 − k1q1))×(β+ − β−
)+
3(eB)2q2⊥
128ω4q
(β+ + β−
)}+ δ′(ω′ − ωq)
{eB q3
4ω2q
(β
(1)9 + β10 − β7
)− eB
4ωq
(β8 + k3 β
(0)9
)− (eB)2
16ω4q
(k1q1 − k2q2
+5q2⊥(k2q2 − k · q)
2ω2q
)(β+ − β−
)−
(eB)2q2⊥
32ω5q
(β+ + β−
)}+ δ(ω′ − ωq)
{eB q3
4ω3q
×(β
(1)9 + β10 − β7
)− (eB)2
16ω5q
(3k1q1 − 3k2q2 +
5q2⊥ (k2q2 − k · q)
2ω2q
)(β+ − β−
)− 1
2
(β
(1)15 + β16 −
(β
(1)14 + β11 + β13
))− (2k2q2 − ~k · ~q )
2ωq
(β
(0)15 − β
(0)14
)+
q3
2ωqβ12
}]× δ(p− ω − ω′), (68)
Im Π332
∣∣∣pole−cut
= 4e2π
∫ Λ
0
k2dk
2π2
∫1
2sin θ dθ
∫dφ
2π
∫ k
−kdω
∫ ∞−∞
dω′[δ′′′(ω′ − ωq)
{−
(eB)2q2⊥
96ω3q
×(β+ + β−
)−
(eB)2q2⊥(k3q3 − k⊥q⊥)
96ω4q
(β+ − β−
)}− δ′′(ω′ − ωq)
{3(eB)2
64ω3q
×(q2⊥ (k3q3 − k⊥q⊥)
ω2q
+ k⊥q⊥
)×(β+ − β−
)+
3(eB)2q2⊥
128ω4q
(β+ + β−
)}+ δ′(ω′ − ωq)
{eB q3
4ω2q
((β
(1)9 + β10 − β7
)+eB
4ωq
(β8 + k3 ρ
(0)9
)− (eB)2
16ω4q
(k⊥q⊥
+5q2⊥(k3q3 − k⊥q⊥)
2ω2q
)(β+ − β−
)−
(eB)2q2⊥
32ω5q
(β+ + β−
)}+ δ(ω′ − ωq)
×{eB q3
4ω3q
(β
(1)9 + β10 − β7
)− (eB)2
16ω5q
(3k⊥q⊥ +
5q2⊥ (k3q3 − k⊥q⊥)
2ω2q
)×(β+ − β−
)− 1
2
(β
(1)15 + β16 −
(β
(1)14 + β13 + β11
))− (2k3q3 − ~k · ~q )
2ωq
×(β
(0)15 − β
(0)14
)− q3
2ωqβ12
}]δ(p− ω − ω′), (69)
Im Π132
∣∣∣pole−cut
18
= 4e2π
∫ Λ
0
k2dk
2π2
∫1
2sin θ dθ
∫dφ
2π
∫ k
−kdω
∫ ∞−∞
dω′[δ′′′(ω′ − ωq)
×{−
(eB)2q2⊥(k1q3 + k3q1)
96ω4q
(β+ − β−
)}− δ′′(ω′ − ωq)
{3(eB)2
64ω3q
(q2⊥ (k1q3 + k3q1)
ω2q
− k3q1
)(β+ − β−
)}+ δ′(ω′ − ωq)
{eB
4ωqk1 β
(0)9 − (eB)2
16ω4q
(− k3q1 +
5q2⊥(k1q3 + k3q1)
2ω2q
)×(β+ − β−
)}+ δ(ω′ − ωq)
{− (eB)2
16ω5q
(− 3k3q1 +
5q2⊥ (k1q3 + k3q1)
2ω2q
)(β+ − β−
)− (k1q3 + k3q1)
2ωq
(β
(0)15 − β
(0)14
)− q1
2ωqβ12
}]δ(p− ω − ω′). (70)
V. RESULTS
We perform the integrations in Eq. (59),(60),(61),(62),(67),(68),(69) and (70) numerically. In
this calculation we have taken mπ = 0.14 GeV. The results are shown for Λ = 0.25 GeV which
satisfies eT � Λ� T .
p=3GeV, T=0.5GeV, eB=mπ2/4
γδ
γσ
π/8 π/4 3π/8 π/28.2×10-6
8.3×10-6
8.4×10-6
8.5×10-6
8.6×10-6
8.7×10-6
8.8×10-6
8.9×10-6
θp
γ[GeV]
FIG. 3: Plot of damping rate of photon with the propagation angle θp for p = 3 GeV, T = 0.5
GeV and eB = m2π/4.
The damping rate of photon in presence of magnetic field depends on the angle, θp, between the
momentum of photon and the magnetic field. Figure 3 shows the variation of the damping rate of
a hard photon with the propagation angle. It increases with the increasing propagation angle. One
can see that the two transverse modes of a hard photon are damped in a similar fashion. Since the
magnetic field strength is very weak, this difference appears to be very small. We note that the
19
magnetic correction is ∼ O[(eB)2] and switching the magnetic field from z to −z direction would
not affect the result. These two orientations of the magnetic field correspond to the propagation
angle of photon θp and π − θp. These two situations are identical which correspond to the same
damping rates of photon at θp and π − θp.
�=�� ���� ��=�π�/�
θ�=π/��
θ�=π/�γ��
γδ
γσ
��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ������ ��-�
��� ��-�
�����-�
��� ��-�
��� ��-�
���� ��-�
������-�
�[���]
γ[���]
FIG. 4: Plot of damping rate of photon with the energy for T = 0.5 GeV and eB = m2π/4 at
propagation angles θp = π/10 and π/2.
In Fig. 4 we display the damping rate as a function of photon momentum for two propagation
angles π/10 and π/2. The soft contribution of the damping rate in a thermal medium agrees well
with that obtained in Ref. [45]. In presence of a thermomagnetic medium, the soft contribution
to the damping rate is found to be reduced than that of the thermal one. For small propagation
angle, the reduction of the damping rate is more compared to that of thermal medium. For
higher momentum the damping rate approaches the thermal value as the temperature becomes the
dominant scale as compared to the strength of the magnetic field considered.
Figure 5 displays the variation of damping rate with temperature for a specific value of mo-
mentum and magnetic field for two propagation angles π/10 and π/2. It is found that the soft
contribution to the damping rate increases with the increase in temperature both in thermal and
thermomagnetic medium. For small propagation angle the damping rate is more reduced compared
to that of large propagation angle. This observation is consistent with Fig. 4.
Figure 6 shows the variation of the damping rate with the magnetic field strength for specific
values of photon momentum and temperature for two propagation angles. The thermal damping
rate (O[(eB)0]) is represented by the black dashed horizontal line. The thermomagnetic damping
20
�=����� ��=�π�/�
θ�=π/��θ�=π/�
�
γδ
γσ
���� ���� ��� ���� ������ ��-�
��� ��-�
�����-�
��� ��-�
��� ��-�
������-�
�[���]
γ[���]
FIG. 5: Plot of damping rate of the hard photon with temperature at p = 3 GeV and eB = m2π/4
for two propagation angles π/10 and π/2.
�=����� �=������
θ�= π/��
θ�= π/�
�
γδ
γσ
��� �π� ��� �π
� ��� �π� ��� �π
������-�
�����-�
��� ��-�
��� ��-�
��� ��-�
��[����]
γ[���]
FIG. 6: Plot of damping rate of the hard photon with the magnetic field strength at T = 0.5 GeV
and p = 3 GeV for two propagation angles π/10 and π/2.
rate decreases with the increasing magnetic field. At smaller propagation angles the photons are
less damped than that of higher propagation angles which are consistent with Fig. 4.
Fig. 7 shows the variation of the photon damping rate with the separation scale Λ keeping
the scale hierarchy eT � Λ � T . As the allowed phase space increases with the increase of Λ,
the damping rate is also found to increase with it 3. The magnetic correction to the thermal
3 Nevertheless, the damping rate is expected to be Λ independent when hard contribution is added.
21
p=3GeV, T=0.5GeV, eB=mπ2/4
θp=π/4γth
γδ
γσ
0.18 0.21 0.24 0.27 0.304×10-6
6×10-6
8×10-6
10×10-6
12×10-6
Λ[GeV]
γ[GeV]
FIG. 7: Plot of damping rate of photon with Λ for θp = π/4, p = 3 GeV, T = 0.5 GeV and
eB = m2π/4.
damping rate is negative. So, the difference between the thermal and thermomagnetic damping
rate increases with Λ.
VI. CONCLUSION
We have calculated the soft contribution to the damping rate of a hard photon in a weakly
magnetized QED medium where momentum of one of the fermion in the loop is considered as soft.
The two degenerate transverse modes of photon in thermal medium are damped in a similar fashion
in presence of weak magnetic field as shown in Fig. 3. The difference between two transverse modes
is very marginal due to weak field approximation. The soft contribution to the damping rate in
thermomagnetic medium is reduced compared to that of thermal medium. When the magnetic
field is switched off thermomagnetic damping modes reduce to its thermal value. The effect of
magnetic field is found to be dominant at low temperature and low photon momentum.
The soft contribution to the hard photon damping rate is ∼ 10−6 GeV. Thus, a photon of a few
GeV energy traversing in the QED medium of temperature ∼0.5 GeV and background magnetic
field ∼0.005 GeV2 has a mean free path (λ = γ−1/2) of a few A. When the present calculation is
extended to the case of relativistic heavy ion collisions, the mean free path of photon is found to
be of a few hundred fm. This confirms that the mean free path of photon is larger than the size of
the fireball and photon can be treated as a direct probe.
22
The damping rate is found to be dependent on the separation scale Λ. One needs to add the
hard contribution with the soft contribution to cancel the Λ dependence of the result. The hard
contribution to the photon damping rate comes from two-loop order with hard particles in the loop
having momentum of the order of or higher than the temperature. This itself is a huge calculation
which is in progress.
Acknowledgement: RG is funded by University Grants Commission (UGC). BK and MGM were
funded by Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), India via the project TPAES. RG and BK would
like to thank Aritra Das for useful discussions.
Appendix A: Spectral representation of the propagators
limε→0
∫ ∞−∞
dxε
x2 + ε2f(x) ≈ f(0)
∫ ∞−∞
dxε
x2 + ε2
significant contribution comes from
integration ,wherex ' 0
= f(0) ε
∫ ∞−∞
dx1
x2 + ε2= π f(0), (A1)
where f(x) is a test function.
From the above equations we can write,
limε→0
ε
x2 + ε2= πδ(x), (A2)
limε→0
Im1
x+ iε=
1
2ilimε→0
[1
x+ iε− 1
x− iε
]=
1
2ilimε→0
−2iε
x2 + ε2= −πδ(x). (A3)
limε→0
∫ ∞−∞
dx2εx
(x2 + ε2)2f(x) = lim
ε→0
∫ ∞−∞
dx εf(x)d
dx
[− 1
(x2 + ε2)
]= lim
ε→0
∫ ∞−∞
dx f ′(x)ε
x2 + ε2
= π f ′(0) = π
∫dx f ′(x)δ(x)
= −π∫dx f(x)δ′(x) (A4)
From the above equation we find,
limε→0
2ε x
(x2 + ε2)2= −πδ′(x). (A5)
23
Now using Eq. (A5) one can calculate,
limε→0
Im1
(x+ iε)2=
1
2ilimε→0
[1
(x+ iε)2− 1
(x− iε)2
]=
1
2ilimε→0
−i4εx(x2 + ε2)2
= πδ′(x). (A6)
Similarly,
limε→0
∫ ∞−∞
dxε3 − 3x2ε
(x2 + ε2)3f(x) = lim
ε→0
∫ ∞−∞
dxε3
(x2 + ε2)3f(x)− lim
ε→0
∫ ∞−∞
dx3x2ε
(x2 + ε2)3f(x)
= I1 + I2, (A7)
where
I1 = limε→0
∫ ∞−∞
dxε3 f(x)
(x2 + ε2)3≈ lim
ε→0ε3 f(0)
∫ ∞−∞
dx1
(x2 + ε2)3= lim
ε→0ε3f(0)
3
8
1
ε5= lim
ε→0
3
8ε2f(0),
I2 = −3 limε→0
∫ ∞−∞
dxx2ε f(x)
(x2 + ε2)3= −3 lim
ε→0ε
∫dx f(x)
[1
8
d2
dx2
(1
x2 + ε2
)+
1
8
2
(x2 + ε2)2
]= − lim
ε→0
3
8ε2f(0)− 3
8limε→0
ε
∫dx f(x)
d2
dx2
(1
x2 + ε2
). (A8)
So ,
I1 + I2 = −3
8limε→0
ε
∫dx f(x)
d2
dx2
(1
x2 + ε2
)=
3
8limε→0
∫dx ε f ′(x)
d
dx
(1
x2 + ε2
)= −3
8limε→0
∫dx ε f ′′(x)
1
x2 + ε2= −3
8π
∫dx f ′′(x)δ(x) = −3
8π
∫ ∞−∞
dx f(x)δ′′(x). (A9)
We can conclude from the last few steps that,
limε→0
ε3 − 3x2ε
(x2 + ε2)3= −3
8πδ′′(x) . (A10)
Using Eq. (A10) we can find
limε→0
Im1
(x+ iε)3=
1
2ilimε→0
[1
(x+ iε)2− 1
(x− iε)3
]= lim
ε→0
ε3 − 6εx2
(x2 + ε2)3= −3
8πδ′′(x) (A11)
Now ,
limε→0
Im1
(x+ iε)4=
1
2ilimε→0
[1
(x+ iε)4− 1
(x− iε)4
]= lim
ε→0
4xε3 − 4x3ε
(x2 + ε2)4, (A12)
limε→0
∫ ∞−∞
dx f(x)4xε3 − 4x3ε
(x2 + ε2)4= lim
ε→04ε
∫ ∞−∞
dx f(x)1
24
d3
dx3
(1
x2 + ε2
)= − lim
ε→0
ε
6
∫ ∞−∞
dx f ′′′(x)1
x2 + ε2= −πf
′′′(0)
6=π
6
∫ ∞−∞
dx f(x)δ′′′(x). (A13)
Thus, limε→0
Im1
(x+ iε)4=π
6δ′′′(x). (A14)
24
Now we write the spectral representations for the free propagators as
ρ(1)0 (ω′, q) =
1
2πlimε→0
Im
[1
ω′ + iε+ ωq+
1
ω′ + iε− ωq
]= −1
2
[δ(ω′ + ωq) + δ(ω′ − ωq)
], (A15)
ρ(0)0 (ω′, q) =
1
2πωqlimε→0
Im
[1
ω′ + iε− ωq− 1
ω′ + iε+ ωq
]=
1
2ωq
[δ(ω′ + ωq)− δ(ω′ − ωq)
],(A16)
ρ(1)1 (ω′, q) =
1
4πωqlimε→0
Im
[1
(ω′ + iε− ωq)2− 1
(ω′ + iε+ ωq)2
]= − 1
4ωq
[δ′(ω′ + ωq)− δ′(ω′ − ωq)
], (A17)
ρ(0)1 (ω′, q) =
1
4πω2q
limε→0
Im
[1
(ω′ + iε+ ωq)2+
1
(ω′ + iε− ωq)2− 1
ωq
(1
ω′ + iε− ωq
− 1
ω′ + iε+ ωq
)]=
1
4ω2q
[δ′(ω′ + ωq) + δ′(ω′ − ωq)−
1
ωq
(δ(ω′ + ωq)− δ(ω′ − ωq)
)], (A18)
ρ(1)2 (ω′, q) =
1
8πω2q
limε→0
Im
[1
(ω′ + iε+ ωq)3+
1
(ω′ + iε− ωq)3+
1
2ωq
{1
(ω′ + iε+ ωq)2
− 1
(ω′ + iε− ωq)2
}]=
1
8ω2q
[− 3
8
(δ′′(ω′ + ωq) + δ′′(ω′ − ωq)
)+
1
2ωq
(δ′(ω′ + ωq)− δ′(ω′ − ωq)
)],(A19)
ρ(0)2 (ω′, q) = − 1
8πω3q
limε→0
Im
[1
(ω′ + iε+ ωq)3− 1
(ω′ + iε− ωq)3+
1
2ωq
{1
(ω′ + iε+ ωq)2
+1
(ω′ + iε− ωq)2+
3
ωq
(1
ω′ + iε+ ωq− 1
ω′ + iε− ωq
)}]= − 1
8ω3q
[− 3
8
(δ′′(ω′ + ωq)− δ′′(ω′ − ωq)
)+
1
2ωq
{δ′(ω′ + ωq) + δ′(ω′ − ωq)
− 3
ωq
(δ(ω′ + ωq)− δ(ω′ − ωq)
)}], (A20)
ρ(1)3 (ω′, q) = − 1
16πω3q
limε→0
Im
[1
(ω′ + iε+ ωq)4− 1
(ω′ + iε− ωq)4+
1
ωq
{1
(ω′ + iε+ ωq)3
+1
(ω′ + iε− ωq)3+
1
2ωq
(1
(ω′ + iε+ ωq)2− 1
(ω′ + iε− ωq)2
)}](A21)
= − 1
16ω3q
[1
6
(δ′′′(ω′ + ωq)− δ′′′(ω′ − ωq)
)+
1
ωq
{− 3
8
(δ′′(ω′ + ωq)
+ δ′′(ω′ − ωq))
+1
2ωq
(δ′(ω′ + ωq)− δ′(ω′ − ωq)
)}], (A22)
ρ(0)3 (ω′, q) =
1
16πω4q
limε→0
Im
[1
(ω′ + iε+ ωq)4+
1
(ω′ + iε− ωq)4+
1
2ωq
{4
(ω′ + iε+ ωq)3
− 4
(ω′ + iε− ωq)3+
1
2ωq
(10
(ω′ + iε+ ωq)2+
10
(ω′ + iε− ωq)2+
1
2ωq
×(
20
ω′ + iε+ ωq− 20
ω′ + iε− ωq
))}](A23)
25
=1
16ω4q
[1
6
(δ′′′(ω′ + ωq) + δ′′′(ω′ − ωq)
)+
1
2ωq
{− 3
2
(δ′′(ω′ + ωq)
− δ′′(ω′ − ωq))
+5
ωq
(δ′(ω′ + ωq) + δ′(ω′ − ωq)−
1
ωq
(δ(ω′ + ωq)
− δ(ω′ − ωq)))}]
. (A24)
The effective propagators are given as,
1
D2=
1
D+D−=∑i
(∂D2
∂ω
)−1∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
1
(ω − ωi), (A25)
1
D4=
1
(D+D−)2=∑i
[(∂D2
∂ω
)−2∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
1
(ω − ωi)2+
∂
∂ω
{(ω − ωi)2
D4
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
1
(ω − ωi)
]
=∑i
[(∂D2
∂ω
)−2∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
1
(ω − ωi)2− ∂2D2
∂ω2
(1
3!
∂3D6
∂ω3
)−1∣∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
1
(ω − ωi)
], (A26)
1
D6=
1
(D+D−)3=∑i
[(∂D2
∂ω
)−3∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
1
(ω − ωi)3+
∂
∂ω
{(ω − ωi)3
D6
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
1
(ω − ωi)2
+1
2
∂2
∂ω2
{(ω − ωi)3
D6
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
1
(ω − ωi)
]
=∑i
[(∂D2
∂ω
)−3∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
1
(ω − ωi)3− 3
2
∂2D2
∂ω2
(1
4!
∂4D8
∂ω4
)−1∣∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
1
(ω − ωi)2
− 3
5
(∂3D2
∂ω3
{6
(∂4D8
∂ω4
)−1
+7
12
(∂D2
∂ω
)−4}+ 6
∂2D2
∂ω2
∂
∂ω
(∂4D8
∂ω4
)−1)∣∣∣∣∣
ω=ωi
× 1
(ω − ωi)
], (A27)
where ωi = ±ω± are the poles of D+ and D−.
The spectral functions of the dressed propagators are given as
ρD± = −(ω2 − k2)
2m2th
[δ(ω − ω±) + δ(ω + ω∓)
]+ β±Θ(k2 − ω2), (A28)
where
β± =−1
2(k ∓ ω)m2th[
k(ω ∓ k)−m2th
{Q0(ωk )∓Q1(ωk )
}]2
+
[12(1∓ ω
k )m2thπ
]2 , (A29)
where we use the Legendre function of second kind
Q0
(ω
k
)=
1
2ln
∣∣∣∣ω + k
ω − k
∣∣∣∣− iπ2 Θ(k2 − ω2). (A30)
ρ4(ω, k) =1
πIm( 1
D2
)= −
∑i
(∂D2
∂ω
)−1∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
δ(ω − ωi) + β4Θ(k2 − ω2)
26
=ω2 − k2
4m2th(k2 − ω2 +m2
th)
[(ω − k)
(δ(ω − ω+) + δ(ω + ω−)
)+ (ω + k)
(δ(ω − ω−)
+ δ(ω + ω+)
)]+ β4Θ(k2 − ω2), (A31)
ρ5(ω, k) =1
πIm( 1
D4
)=∑i
[(∂D2
∂ω
)−2∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
δ′(ω − ωi) +∂2D2
∂ω2
(1
3!
∂3D6
∂ω3
)−1∣∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
× δ(ω − ωi)
]+ β5Θ(k2 − ω2), (A32)
ρ6(ω, k) =1
πIm( 1
D6
)=∑i
[− 3
8
(∂D2
∂ω
)−3∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
δ′′(ω − ωi)−3
2
∂2D2
∂ω2
(1
4!
∂4D8
∂ω4
)−1∣∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
× δ′(ω − ωi) +3
5
(∂3D2
∂ω3
{6
(∂4D8
∂ω4
)−1
+7
12
(∂D2
∂ω
)−4}+ 6
∂2D2
∂ω2
∂
∂ω
(∂4D8
∂ω4
)−1)∣∣∣∣∣
ω=ωi
× δ(ω − ωi)
]+ β6Θ(k2 − ω2), (A33)
ρ7(ω, k) =1
πIm
(b′
D2
)= − b′
∑i
(∂D2
∂ω
∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
)−1
δ(ω − ωi) + β7Θ(k2 − ω2), (A34)
ρ8(ω, k) =1
πIm
(c′
D2
)= − c′
∑i
(∂D2
∂ω
∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
)−1
δ(ω − ωi) + β8Θ(k2 − ω2), (A35)
ρ(0)9 (ω, k) =
1
πIm
(h(1 + a)
D4
)= h(1 + a)×
∑i
[(∂D2
∂ω
∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
)−2
δ′(ω − ωi)
− ∂
∂ω
{(ω − ωi)2
D4
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
δ(ω − ωi)
]+ β
(0)9 Θ(k2 − ω2), (A36)
ρ(1)9 (ω, k) =
1
πIm
(h(1 + a)ω
D4
)= ω h(1 + a)×
∑i
[(∂D2
∂ω
∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
)−2
δ′(ω − ωi)
− ∂
∂ω
{(ω − ωi)2
D4
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
δ(ω − ωi)
]+ β
(1)9 Θ(k2 − ω2), (A37)
ρ10(ω, k) =1
πIm
(hb
D4
)= hb×
∑i
[(∂D2
∂ω
∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
)−2
δ′(ω − ωi)−∂
∂ω
{(ω − ωi)2
D4
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
× δ(ω − ωi)
]+ β10Θ(k2 − ω2), (A38)
ρ11(ω, k) =1
πIm
[hb′
D4
]= hb′ ×
∑i
[(∂D2
∂ω
∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
)−2
δ′(ω − ωi)−∂
∂ω
{(ω − ωi)2
D4
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
× δ(ω − ωi)
]+ β11Θ(k2 − ω2), (A39)
ρ12(ω, k) =1
πIm
[hc′
D4
]= hc′ ×
∑i
[(∂D2
∂ω
∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
)−2
δ′(ω − ωi)−∂
∂ω
{(ω − ωi)2
D4
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
27
× δ(ω − ωi)
]+ β12Θ(k2 − ω2), (A40)
ρ13(ω, k) =1
πIm
[h′b
D4
]= h′b×
∑i
[(∂D2
∂ω
∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
)−2
δ′(ω − ωi)−∂
∂ω
{(ω − ωi)2
D4
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
× δ(ω − ωi)
]+ β13Θ(k2 − ω2), (A41)
ρ(0)14 (ω, k) =
1
πIm
[h′(1 + a)
D4
]= h′(1 + a)
∑i
[(∂D2
∂ω
∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
)−2
δ′(ω − ωi)
− ∂
∂ω
{(ω − ωi)2
D4
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
δ(ω − ωi)
]+ β
(0)14 Θ(k2 − ω2), (A42)
ρ(1)14 (ω, k) =
1
πIm
[k0 h
′(1 + a)
D4
]= ω h′(1 + a)
∑i
[(∂D2
∂ω
∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
)−2
δ′(ω − ωi)
− ∂
∂ω
{(ω − ωi)2
D4
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
δ(ω − ωi)
]+ β
(1)14 Θ(k2 − ω2), (A43)
ρ(0)15 (ω, k) =
1
πIm
[h2(1 + a)
D6
]= h2(1 + a)×
∑i
[− 3
8
(∂D2
∂ω
∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
)−3
δ′′(ω − ωi)
+∂
∂ω
{(ω − ωi)3
D6
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
δ′(ω − ωi)−∂2
∂ω2
{(ω − ωi)3
D6
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
δ(ω − ωi)
]+ β
(0)15 Θ(k2 − ω2), (A44)
ρ(1)15 (ω, k) =
1
πIm
[h2(1 + a)k0
D6
]= ω h2(1 + a)×
∑i
[− 3
8
(∂D2
∂ω
∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
)−3
δ′′(ω − ωi)
+∂
∂ω
{(ω − ωi)3
D6
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
δ′(ω − ωi)−∂2
∂ω2
{(ω − ωi)3
D6
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
δ(ω − ωi)
]+ β
(1)15 Θ(k2 − ω2), (A45)
ρ16(ω, k) =1
πIm
[h2b
D6
]= h2b×
∑i
[− 3
8
(∂D2
∂ω
∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
)−3
δ′′(ω − ωi) +∂
∂ω
{(ω − ωi)3
D6
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
× δ′(ω − ωi)−∂2
∂ω2
{(ω − ωi)3
D6
}∣∣∣∣ω=ωi
δ(ω − ωi)
]+ β16Θ(k2 − ω2), (A46)
where cut parts of the spectral functions are given as
β4 =1
πIm
(1
D2
)= − 1
π
ImD2
(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2, (A47)
β5 =1
πIm
(1
D4
)= − 1
π
2 ReD2 ImD2[(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2
]2 , (A48)
β6 =1
πIm
(1
D6
)=
1
π
(ImD2
)3− 3(
ReD2)2
ImD2[(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2
]3 , (A49)
28
β7 =1
πIm
(b′
D2
)=
1
π
−Re b′ ImD2 + Im b′ReD2
(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2, (A50)
β8 =1
πIm
(c′
D2
)=
1
π
−Re c′ ImD2 + Im c′ReD2
(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2, (A51)
β(0)9 =
1
2Im
(h(1 + a)
D4
)
=1
π
Im(h(1 + a)
)[(ReD2)2 − (ImD2)2
]− 2 ReD2 ImD2 Re
(h(1 + a)
)[(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2
]2 , (A52)
β(1)9 =
1
2Im
(h(1 + a)k0
D4
)
=1
π
Im(hk0(1 + a)
)[(ReD2)2 − (ImD2)2
]− 2 ReD2 ImD2 Re
(hk0(1 + a)
)[(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2
]2 , (A53)
β10 =1
2Im
(h b
D4
)=
1
π
Im(h b)[
(ReD2)2 − (ImD2)2
]− 2 ReD2 ImD2 Re
(h b)
[(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2
]2 , (A54)
β11 =1
2Im
(h b′
D4
)=
1
π
Im(h b′)[
(ReD2)2 − (ImD2)2
]− 2 ReD2 ImD2 Re
(h b′)
[(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2
]2 , (A55)
β12 =1
2Im
(h c′
D4
)=
1
π
Im(h c′)[
(ReD2)2 − (ImD2)2
]− 2 ReD2 ImD2 Re
(h c′)
[(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2
]2 , (A56)
β13 =1
2Im
(h′ b
D4
)=
1
π
Im(h′ b)[
(ReD2)2 − (ImD2)2
]− 2 ReD2 ImD2 Re
(h′ b)
[(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2
]2 , (A57)
β(0)14 =
1
2Im
(h′ (1 + a)
D4
)
=1
π
Im(h′ (1 + a)
)[(ReD2)2 − (ImD2)2
]− 2 ReD2 ImD2 Re
(h′ (1 + a)
)[(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2
]2 , (A58)
β(1)14 =
1
2Im
(h′ (1 + a)k0
D4
)
=1
π
Im(h′ (1 + a)k0
)[(ReD2)2 − (ImD2)2
]− 2 ReD2 ImD2 Re
(h′ (1 + a)k0
)[(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2
]2 ,
(A59)
β(0)15 =
1
πIm
(h2(1 + a)
D6
)
29
=1
π
Im (h2 (1 + a))
[(ReD2)3 − 3ReD2(ImD2)2
]+ Re (h2 (1 + a))
[(ImD2)3 − 3ImD2(ReD2)2
][(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2
]3
(A60)
β(1)15 =
1
πIm
(h2(1 + a)k0
D6
)
=1
π
Im (h2 (1 + a)k0)
[(ReD2)3 − 3ReD2(ImD2)2
]+ Re (h2 (1 + a)k0)
[(ImD2)3 − 3ImD2(ReD2)2
][(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2
]3
(A61)
β16 =1
πIm
(h2 b
D6
)
=1
π
Im (h2 b)
[(ReD2)3 − 3ReD2(ImD2)2
]+ Re (h2 b)
[(ImD2)3 − 3ImD2(ReD2)2
][(ReD2)2 + (ImD2)2
]3
(A62)
where
Im(D2) = −πm4
th
k2
[ω
k+(
1− ω2
k2
)Q0
(ωk
)], (A63)
Re(D2) = ω2 − k2 − 2m2th +
m4th
k2
(2ω
kQ0
(ω
k
)− 1
)+m4
th
k2
(1− ω2
k2
)(Q2
0
(ω
k
)− π2
4
), (A64)
Im(b′) = −4e2M2π k3 ω
2k3, (A65)
Re(b′) = 4e2M2 k3
k2
[ω
kQ0
(ω
k
)− 1
], (A66)
Im(c′) = −4e2M2 π
2k, (A67)
Re(c′) = 4e2M2 1
kQ0
(ω
k
), (A68)
Im(h(1 + a)
)=
4πe2M2k3
2k7
(− 2k6 − 2k4
(k2
0 + 3m2th
)+ 12k3k0m
2thQ0 − 4k2m2
th
(k2
0 + m2th
)+ 4kk0m
2thQ0
(k2
0 + 4m2th
)+ k2
0 m4th
(π2 − 12Q2
0
)),
Re(h(1 + a)) =4e2M2k3
2k7
(4k6Q0 − 4k5k0 + 4k4Q0
(k2
0 + 3m2th
)+ k3k0m
2th
(−12Q2
0 + 3π2 − 4)
+ 8k2m2thQ0
(k2
0 + m2th
)+ kk0m
2th
(π2 − 4Q2
0
) (k2
0 + 4m2th
)+ 2k2
0 m4thQ0
×(4Q2
0 − 3π2))
, (A69)
Im(h b) =4πe2M2k3m
2th
2k7
(4k2k0
(k2
0 + m2th
)+ 4kQ0
(k4 + 2m2
th
(k2 − 2k2
0
)− k4
0
)+ 12k0m
2thQ
20(k0 − k)(k + k0) + π2k0m
2th(k − k0)(k + k0)
), (A70)
30
Re(h b) =4e2M2k3m
2th
2k7
(k5(π2 − 4Q2
0
)+ 2k3
(2k2
0 + m2th
(π2 − 4Q2
0
))− 2k2k0Q0
×(
4k20 + m2
th
(−4Q2
0 + 3π2 + 4) )− kk2
0
(π2 − 4Q2
0
) (k2
0 + 4m2th
)+ 2k3
0 m2thQ0
×(3π2 − 4Q2
0
)), (A71)
Im(h b′) =16πe4M4k2
3
2k7
(2k4 − 4k3k0Q0 + 4k2
(k2
0 + m2th
)− 4kk0Q0
(k2
0 + 4m2th
)− k2
0 m2th
(π2 − 12Q2
0
)), (A72)
Re(h b′) = −16e4M4k23
2k7
(4k4Q0 + k3k0
(π2 − 4
(Q2
0 + 1))
+ 8k2Q0
(k2
0 + m2th
)+ kk0
(π2 − 4Q2
0
) (k2
0 + 4m2th
)+ 2k2
0 m2thQ0
(4Q2
0 − 3π2))
, (A73)
Im(h c′) = −16πe4M4k3
2k5
(4k3Q0 − 2k2k0 + 4kQ0
(k2
0 + 2m2th
)+ k0m
2th
(π2 − 12Q2
0
)), (A74)
Re(h c′) = −16e4M4k3
2k5
(k3(π2 − 4Q2
0
)+ 4k2k0Q0 + k
(π2 − 4Q2
0
) (k2
0 + 2m2th
)+ 2k0m
2thQ0
(4Q2
0 − 3π2))
, (A75)
Im(h′b) =8πe4M4m2
th
k9
(k6
(π2
4− 3Q2
0
)− 2k5ωQ0 + k4
(k2
3 − ω2
(π2
4− 3Q2
0
))− 4k3ωk2
3Q0 − k2ω2k23
(−3Q2
0 +π2
4+ 3
)+ 6kω3k2
3Q0 + ω4k23
(π2
4− 3Q2
0
)), (A76)
Re(h′b) =16e4M4m2
th
k9
(k6
(Q3
0 −3π2
4Q0
)+ k5ω
(Q2
0 −π2
4
)− k4Q0
(ω2(Q2
0 −3π2
4
)+ k2
3
)+ k3ωk2
3
(2Q2
0 −π2
2− 1
)+ k2ω2k2
3Q0
(−Q2
0 +3π2
4+ 3
)+ 3kω3k2
3
(π2
4−Q2
0
)+ ω4k2
3Q0
(Q2
0 −3π2
4
)), (A77)
Im(h′ (1 + a)) =8πe4M4
k9
(2k7Q0 + 2k5m2
thQ0 + k4ω(
2k23 +m2
th
(π2
4− 3Q2
0
))− 2k3ω2k2
3Q0
+ 3k2ωk23m
2th − 6kω2k2
3m2thQ0 − ω3k2
3m2th
(π2
4− 3Q2
0
)), (A78)
Re(h′ (1 + a)) =16e4M4
k9
(k7(π2
4−Q2
0
)+ k5
(k2
3 +m2th
(π2
4−Q2
0
))+ k4ωQ0
×(m2
th
(Q2
0 −3π2
4
)− 2k2
3
)+ k3k2
3
(ω2(Q2
0 −π2
4
)+m2
th
)− 3k2ωk2
3m2thQ0
+ 3kω2k23m
2th
(Q2
0 −π2
4
)− ω3k2
3m2thQ0
(Q2
0 −3π2
4
)), (A79)
Im(h2(1 + a)
)=
16πe4M4k23
2k11
(− 8k9Q0 + 8k8k0 − 8k7Q0
(2k2
0 + 5m2th
)+ k6k0
(8k2
0
31
+ m2th
(60Q2
0 − 5π2 + 24))− 8k5Q0
(k4
0 + 12k20 m
2th + 8m4
th
)+ 2k4k0m
2th
×(k2
0
(36Q2
0 − 3π2 + 6)− 8m2
th
(−12Q2
0 + π2 − 1))− 8k3m2
thQ0
(3k4
0
− 4k20 m
2th
(−4Q2
0 + π2 − 3)
+ 4m4th
)− k2k0m
2th
(π2 − 12Q2
0
) (k4
0 + 12k20 m
2th
+ 12m4th
)+ 16kk2
0 m4thQ0
(π2 − 4Q2
0
) (k2
0 + 3m2th
)+ k3
0 m6th
(80Q4
0 − 40π2Q20 + π4
)), (A80)
Re(h2(1 + a)
)= −16e4M4k2
3
k11
(k9(π2 − 4Q2
0
)+ 8k8k0Q0 + k7
(2k2
0
(−4Q2
0 + π2 − 2)
+ 5m2th
(π2 − 4Q2
0
) )+ k6k0Q0
(8k2
0 + m2th
(20Q2
0 − 15π2 + 24) )
+ k5(k4
0
(π2 − 4Q2
0
)+ 4k2
0 m2th
(− 12Q2
0 + 3π2 − 1)
+ 8m4th
(π2 − 4Q2
0
) )+ 2k4k0m
2thQ0
(k2
0
(12Q2
0 − 9π2 + 6)
+ 8m2th
(4Q2
0 − 3π2 + 1))
+ k3m2th
(3k4
0
(π2 − 4Q2
0
)− 2k2
0 m2th
(8(2Q2
0 + 3)Q2
0 − 6π2(4Q2
0 + 1)
+ π4)
+ 4m4th
(π2 − 4Q2
0
))+ k2k0m
2thQ0
(4Q2
0 − 3π2) (k4
0 + 12k20 m
2th + 12m4
th
)− kk2
0 m4th
(16Q4
0 − 24π2Q20 + π4
) (k2
0 + 3m2th
)+ k3
0 m6thQ0
(16Q4
0 − 40π2Q20 + 5π4
)), (A81)
Im(h2b) =16πe4M4k2
3 m2th
2k11
(k8(−(π2 − 12Q2
0
))− 8k7k0Q0 − k6
(k2
0
(−12Q2
0 + π2 + 4)
+ 4m2th
(π2 − 12Q2
0
) )+ 16k5k0Q0
(k2
0 + m2th
(π2 − 4Q2
0
))+ k4
(k4
0
(π2 − 12
(Q2
0 + 1) )− 16k2
0 m2th − 4m4
th
(π2 − 12Q2
0
))+ 8k3k0Q0
(3k4
0 + 12k20 m
2th + 4m4
th
(−4Q2
0 + π2 + 1))
+ k2k20
(k4
0
(π2 − 12Q2
0
)+ 12k2
0 m2th
(π2 − 12Q2
0
)+ m4
th
(80Q4
0 − 8(18 + 5π2
)Q2
0
+ π2(12 + π2
)))− 16kk3
0 m2thQ0
(π2 − 4Q2
0
) (k2
0 + 3m2th
)− k4
0 m4th
(80Q4
0 − 40π2Q20 + π4
)), (A82)
Re(h2b) =16e4M4k2
3 m2th
k11
(k8(3π2Q0 − 4Q3
0
)− k7k0
(π2 − 4Q2
0
)+ k6Q0
(k2
0
(−4Q2
0 + 3π2 + 4)
+ 4m2th
(3π2 − 4Q2
0
) )+ k5k0
(2k2
0
(−4Q2
0 + π2 − 2)
+ m2th
(16Q4
0 − 24π2Q20 + π4
))
32
+ k4Q0
(k4
0
(4Q2
0 − 3π2 + 12)
+ 16k20 m
2th + 4m4
th
(3π2 − 4Q2
0
))+ k3k0
(3k4
0
(π2 − 4Q2
0
)+ 12k2
0 m2th
(π2 − 4Q2
0
)+ 2m4
th
(16Q4
0 − 8(1 + 3π2
)Q2
0 + π2(2 + π2
)))+ k2k2
0Q0
×(
4Q20
(k4
0 + 12k20 m
2th + 2
(6 + 5π2
)m4
th
)− π2
(3k4
0 + 36k20 m
2th +
(36 + 5π2
)m4
th
)− 16m4
thQ40
)− kk3
0 m2th
(16Q4
0 − 24π2Q20 + π4
) (k2
0 + 3m2th
)+ k4
0 m4thQ0
(16Q4
0
− 40π2Q20 + 5π4
)), (A83)
where M2 is defined in Eq. (29).
[1] D. A. Uzdensky and S. Rightley, Plasma Physics of Extreme Astrophysical Environments, Rept. Prog.
Phys. 77, 036902 (2014) [arXiv:1401.5110 [astro-ph.HE]].
[2] A. K. Ganguly, S. Konar and P. B. Pal, Faraday effect: A Field theoretical point of view, Phys. Rev.
D 60, 105014 (1999) [hep-ph/9905206].
[3] M. Giovannini, Cosmic microwave background polarization, Faraday rotation, and stochastic gravity-
waves backgrounds,’ Phys. Rev. D 56, 3198 (1997) [hep-th/9706201].
[4] E. P. Liang, S. C. Wilks, and M Tabak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4887 (1998).
[5] M. H. Thoma, Field Theoretic Description of Ultrarelativistic Electron-Positron Plasmas, Rev. Mod.
Phys. 81, 959 (2009) [arXiv:0801.0956 [physics.plasm-ph]].
[6] M. H. Thoma, What can we learn from electromagnetic plasmas about the quark-gluon plasma?, J.
Phys. A 42, 214004 (2009) [arXiv:0809.1507 [hep-ph]].
[7] V. Skokov, A. Y. Illarionov and V. Toneev, Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion
collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 5925 (2009) [arXiv:0907.1396 [nucl-th]].
[8] A. Bzdak and V. Skokov, Anisotropy of photon production: initial eccentricity or magnetic field, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 110, no. 19, 192301 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.192301 [arXiv:1208.5502 [hep-ph]].
[9] L. McLerran and V. Skokov, Comments About the Electromagnetic Field in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Nucl.
Phys. A 929 (2014) 184 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.05.008 [arXiv:1305.0774 [hep-ph]].
[10] K. Tuchin, Electromagnetic radiation by quark-gluon plasma in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. C 87, no.
2, 024912 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.024912 [arXiv:1206.0485 [hep-ph]].
[11] K. Tuchin, Magnetic contribution to dilepton production in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 88,
024910 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.024910 [arXiv:1305.0545 [nucl-th]].
[12] K. Tuchin, Particle production in strong electromagnetic fields in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Adv.
High Energy Phys. 2013, 490495 (2013) doi:10.1155/2013/490495 [arXiv:1301.0099 [hep-ph]].
[13] J. Alexandre, K. Farakos and G. Koutsoumbas, Magnetic catalysis in QED(3) at finite temperature:
Beyond the constant mass approximation, Phys. Rev. D 63, 065015 (2001) [hep-th/0010211].
33
[14] V. P. Gusynin and I. A. Shovkovy, Chiral symmetry breaking in QED in a magnetic field at finite
temperature, Phys. Rev. D 56, 5251 (1997) [hep-ph/9704394].
[15] D. S. Lee, C. N. Leung and Y. J. Ng, Chiral symmetry breaking in a uniform external magnetic field,
Phys. Rev. D 55, 6504 (1997) [hep-th/9701172].
[16] V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky and I. A. Shovkovy, Catalysis of dynamical flavor symmetry breaking
by a magnetic field in (2+1)-dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3499 (1994) Erratum: [Phys. Rev. Lett.
76, 1005 (1996)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1005, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.3499 [hep-ph/9405262].
[17] G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, A. Schafer and K. K. Szabo, The
QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields, JHEP 1202, 044 (2012) [arXiv:1111.4956 [hep-lat]].
[18] V. G. Bornyakov, P. V. Buividovich, N. Cundy, O. A. Kochetkov and A. Schafer, Deconfinement
transition in two-flavor lattice QCD with dynamical overlap fermions in an external magnetic field,
Phys. Rev. D 90, 034501 (2014) [arXiv:1312.5628 [hep-lat]].
[19] N. Mueller and J. M. Pawlowski, Magnetic catalysis and inverse magnetic catalysis in QCD, Phys. Rev.
D 91, 116010 (2015) [arXiv:1502.08011 [hep-ph]].
[20] A. Ayala, M. Loewe, A. Z. Mizher and Zamora, R., Inverse magnetic catalysis for the chiral transition
induced by thermo-magnetic effects on the coupling constant, Phys. Rev.D 90, 036001 (2014)
[21] R. L. S. Farias, K. P. Gomes, G. I. Krein and M. B. Pinto, Importance of asymptotic freedom
for the pseudocritical temperature in magnetized quark matter, Phys. Rev. C 90, 025203 (2014)
[arXiv:1404.3931 [hep-ph]].
[22] A. Ayala, M. Loewe and R. Zamora, Inverse magnetic catalysis in the linear sigma model with quarks,
Phys. Rev. D 91, 016002 (2015) [arXiv:1406.7408 [hep-ph]].
[23] A. Ayala, M. Loewe and R. Zamora, Inverse magnetic catalysis in the linear sigma model, J. Phys.
Conf. Ser. 720, 012026 (2016).
[24] A. Ayala, C. A. Dominguez, L. A. Hernandez, M. Loewe and R. Zamora, Inverse magnetic catalysis from
the properties of the QCD coupling in a magnetic field, Phys. Lett. B 759, 99 (2016), [arXiv:1510.09134
[hep-ph]].
[25] R. L. S. Farias, V. S. Timoteo, S. S. Avancini, M. B. Pinto and G. Krein, Thermo-magnetic effects in
quark matter: Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model constrained by lattice QCD, Eur. Phys. J. A 53, no. 5, 101
(2017) doi:10.1140/epja/i2017-12320-8 [arXiv:1603.03847 [hep-ph]].
[26] A. Bandyopadhyay, B. Karmakar, N. Haque and M. G. Mustafa, Pressure of a weakly magnetized hot
and dense deconfined QCD matter in one-loop hard-thermal-loop perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D
100, no. 3, 034031 (2019) [arXiv:1702.02875 [hep-ph]].
[27] B. Karmakar, R. Ghosh, A. Bandyopadhyay, N. Haque and M. G. Mustafa, Anisotropic pressure of
deconfined QCD matter in presence of strong magnetic field within one-loop approximation, Phys. Rev.
D 99, no. 9, 094002 (2019) [arXiv:1902.02607 [hep-ph]].
[28] S. Rath and B. K. Patra, One-loop QCD thermodynamics in a strong homogeneous and static magnetic
field, JHEP 1712, 098 (2017) [arXiv:1707.02890 [hep-th]].
34
[29] M. Kurian, S. Mitra and V. Chandra, Transport coefficients of hot magnetized QCD matter beyond
the lowest Landau level approximation, arXiv:1805.07313 [nucl-th].
[30] M. Kurian and V. Chandra, Bulk viscosity of a hot QCD/QGP medium in strong magnetic field within
relaxation-time approximation, arXiv:1802.07904 [nucl-th].
[31] M. Kurian and V. Chandra, Effective description of hot QCD medium in strong magnetic field and
longitudinal conductivity, Phys. Rev. D 96, 114026 (2017) [arXiv:1709.08320 [nucl-th]].
[32] A. Das, A. Bandyopadhyay, P. K. Roy and M. G. Mustafa, General structure of fermion two-point
function and its spectral representation in a hot magnetized medium, Phys. Rev. D 97, no. 3, 034024
(2018)
[33] B. Karmakar, A. Bandyopadhyay, N. Haque and M. G. Mustafa, General structure of gauge boson
propagator and its spectra in a hot magnetized medium, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, no. 8, 658 (2019)
[arXiv:1804.11336 [hep-ph]].
[34] K. Hattori and D. Satow, Gluon spectrum in a quark-gluon plasma under strong magnetic fields, Phys.
Rev. D 97, no. 1, 014023 (2018) [arXiv:1704.03191 [hep-ph]].
[35] A. Ayala, C. A. Dominguez, S. Hernandez-Ortiz, L. A. Hernandez, M. Loewe, D. Manreza Paret and
R. Zamora, Gluon polarization tensor in a thermo-magnetic medium, arXiv:1805.07344 [hep-ph].
[36] A. Das, N. Haque, M. G. Mustafa and P. K. Roy, Hard dilepton production from a weakly magnetized
hot QCD medium, Phys. Rev. D 99, no. 9, 094022 (2019) [arXiv:1903.03528 [hep-ph]].
[37] K. Tuchin, Electromagnetic radiation by quark-gluon plasma in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. C 87,
024912 (2013),
[38] A. Bandyopadhyay, C. A. Islam and M. G. Mustafa, Electromagnetic spectral properties and Debye
screening of a strongly magnetized hot medium, Phys. Rev. D 94, 114034 (2016) [arXiv:1602.06769
[hep-ph]].
[39] N. Sadooghi and F. Taghinavaz, Dilepton production rate in a hot and magnetized quark-gluon plasma,
Annals Phys. 376, 218 (2017) [arXiv:1601.04887 [hep-ph]].
[40] K. Tuchin, Magnetic contribution to dilepton production in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 88,
024910 (2013), [arXiv:1305.0545 [nucl-th]].
[41] A. Bandyopadhyay and S. Mallik, Effect of magnetic field on dilepton production in a hot plasma,
Phys. Rev. D 95, 074019 (2017) [arXiv:1704.01364 [hep-ph]].
[42] K. A. Mamo, Enhanced thermal photon and dilepton production in strongly coupled N = 4 SYM
plasma in strong magnetic field, JHEP 1308, 083 (2013) [arXiv:1210.7428 [hep-th]].
[43] M. H. Thoma, Parton interaction rates in the quark - gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D 49, 451 (1994)
[hep-ph/9308257].
[44] J. I. Kapusta, P. Lichard and D. Seibert, High-energy photons from quark - gluon plasma versus hot
hadronic gas, Phys. Rev. D 44, 2774 (1991) Erratum: [Phys. Rev. D 47, 4171 (1993)].
[45] M. H. Thoma, Damping rate of a hard photon in a relativistic plasma, Phys. Rev. D 51, 862 (1995)
[hep-ph/9405309].
35
[46] H. A. Weldon, Simple Rules for Discontinuities in Finite Temperature Field Theory, Phys. Rev. D 28,
2007 (1983).
[47] E. Braaten, R. D. Pisarski and T. C. Yuan, Production of Soft Dileptons in the Quark - Gluon Plasma,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2242 (1990).
[48] M. H. Thoma, New developments and applications of thermal field theory, hep-ph/0010164.
[49] T. K. Chyi, C. W. Hwang, W. F. Kao, G. L. Lin, K. W. Ng and J. J. Tseng, The weak field expansion
for processes in a homogeneous background magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 105014 [hep-
th/9912134].
[50] M. L. Bellac, Thermal Field Theory, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511721700
[51] J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale, Finite-temperature field theory: Principles and applications,
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511535130.
