Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CO2 GeoNet ProjectIntegrating Risk Assessment Tools in a
Consistent Framework for CO2 Geological Storage Performance Assessment
Co-ordinator: Imperial College London (IMPERIAL)
Partners: Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO)
Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres (BRGM)
Institut Français du Pétrole (IFP)
Task 1 Risk and performance assessment inventorycontents
1. SCENARIO DEVELOPMENTThe scenarios approachAssessment basis (FEPs databases)Scenarios construction methodologies
2. MODEL DEVELOPMENTConceptual models developmentProcess level modellingModelling tools (software codes) System level models
3. PROBABILISTIC ANALYSISTreatment of uncertaintiesProbabilistic performance assessmentSensitivity analysisExpert judgment elicitation
Task 3 Development of a consistent conceptual framework for CO2 storage performance assessment
The aims of this task are to:
- identify the strengths/weaknesses of existing/under development methodologies for CO2 storage performanceand risk assessment;
- determine the complimentary functionality or niche for each;
- identify gaps where improvements can be implemented; and
- harmonise the use of tools and methods under a unified conceptual framework.
Relevance of risk assessment to the lifetime stages of a CO2 storage project
data availability resolutionaccuracy
site specific knowledge
A. Site Selection
B. Storage Licensing
C. Storage Monitoring and Verification
D. Potential Leakage Mitigation Plan
Conceptual CO2 storage risk assessment framework
Pathway
Source
Receptor
Risk Evaluation
Risk Management
Risk communication
Risk Assessment
Ris
k E
stim
ati
on
Potential hazard assessment
Exposure assessment
Consequence assessment
Conceptual CO2 storage risk assessment framework
Risk Assessment
Tier 3Tier 3 Consequenceassessment
Source
Pathway Risk Evaluation
Tier 1Tier 1 Potential hazard assessment
Tier 2Tier 2 Exposure assessment
Receptor
Risk communication
Risk Management
Conceptual CO2 storage risk assessment framework
A. Site SelectionB. Storage LicensingC. Storage Monitoring
and VerificationD. Potential Leakage
Mitigation PlanTier 1Potential Hazard Assessment
Scenario analysis toolsFEPs analysis toolsConceptual model development tools
Data requirements: modest, use of generic data
Risk evaluation
Risk likelihood (likely, …, unlikely) and
Significance (negligible, marginal, significant)
Conceptual CO2 storage risk assessment framework
A. Site SelectionB. Storage LicensingC. Storage Monitoring
and VerificationD. Potential Leakage
Mitigation PlanTier 1Potential Hazard Assessment
Scenario analysis toolsFEPs analysis toolsConceptual model development toolsTreatment of uncertaintiesSystem level modelling
Data requirements: generic datacoarse site specific data (aggregation, audit)
Risk evaluation
Risk and significance qualitative,semi-quantitative
Performance: CO2 fluxEcosystem acceptable
levels(?)
Conceptual CO2 storage risk assessment framework
A. Site SelectionB. Storage LicensingC. Storage Monitoring
and VerificationD. Potential Leakage
Mitigation PlanTier 2Exposure Assessment
Process level modelling toolsfluid flow codes; geochemical codes; geomechanical codes, …ecosystem modelling codes(?)
System level modelsTreatment of uncertainties, natural heterogeneity (geological model)
Data requirements: site specific data, surrogate data from analogue sites(data audit)
Risk evaluation
Risk and significance quantitative
Performance: CO2 flux (volume, timescale)
Receptor based thresholds (?)
Conceptual CO2 storage risk assessment framework
A. Site SelectionB. Storage LicensingC. Storage Monitoring
and VerificationD. Potential Leakage
Mitigation PlanTier 3Consequence Assessment
Ecosystem modellingecotoxicity assessment, biodiversity impact assessment, dose - response curves
Data requirements: experimental data from laboratory and field studies
Risk evaluation
Receptor based thresholds (?)
Conceptual CO2 storage risk assessment framework
Source
Pathway
Receptor
Risk Evaluation
Tier 1Tier 1 Potential hazard assessment
Tier 2Tier 2 Exposure assessment
Tier 3Tier 3 Consequenceassessment
A. Site SelectionB. Storage Licensing
B. Storage LicensingC. Storage Monitoring
and VerificationD. Potential Leakage
Mitigation Plan
C. Storage Monitoring and Verification
D. Potential Leakage
Risk Assessment
Mitigation PlanRisk communication
Risk Management
Relevance of …
at the lifetime stages of a CO2 storage project
Site characterisationstandards for site characterisation (?)standards for site selection (?)
Risk Assessmentstandards for risk evaluation
A. Site SelectionB. Storage LicensingC. Storage Monitoring
and VerificationD. Potential Leakage
Mitigation PlanValue of Information
Risk Managementincluding risk communication