RGP Keratoconus Fitting KL 2013

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

rgp

Citation preview

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 1

    Specialty RGP Fitting Igel E-conus Lens

    By Simon Lam

    BSc in Opt, PD in Opt, MBAAssociate Lecturer, Republic Polytechnic

    Clinical Consultant, Optic Point Eyecare Centre, Singapore

    Evaluation of RGP Fitting

    Position (static centration)

    Movement (displacement and speed)

    Fluorescein Pattern

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 2

    Summary of Keratoconus Shapes

    Corneal Shape affect RGP fitting

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 3

    Rules of Thumb for K-conus Lens Fitting

    Igel E-conusNormal Fitting Criteria:Average K - 0.2mm

    Igel E-conusFlat Peripheral Fitting Criteria:BC + 0.2mm

    Igel E-conusLarge Diameter Fitting Criteria:OAD + 0.4mm

    Tailor-madeScleral lens

    Two Point Touch Large Diameter Fitting Criteria

    Tailor-made Scleral lens

    Two Point Touch Large Diameter Fitting Criteria

    Topo map Shape Lens Use Remarks

    Mild to Moderate Keratoconus with relatively normal corneal shape

    These corneas have normal characteristics in the mid periphery

    Fit with lenses of base curves in the range 7.10 8.00 in the same way as normal corneas.

    If the peripheral cornea was relatively steep and may need to be fitted as steep periphery type.

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 4

    Cornea with steep central/inferior area and steep mid-periphery/periphery

    Cornea demonstrates steep central K readings and a relatively steep mid peripheral and peripheral curvature, even compared to a normal cornea.

    The corneal profile appears to have steep sides and this corneal shape is best fitted with base curves between 5.50 to 6.50 from the Fitting Set.

    Cornea with steep central/inferior area and relatively flat mid-periphery

    The mid periphery tends to be even flatter than normal corneas and it is advised to start with Fitting Lenses in the range 6.10 7.30.

    For nipple cones, the difference between central and mid peripheral areas is even more extreme and suggested first choice Fitting Lens is FK +0.7xCorneal Cyl and a periphery equivalent to (BC -0.2mm).

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 5

    Static Centration

    Horizontal: nasal/temporal (0 mm) Vertical: superior/inferior (0 mm) Movement: 1 mm, smooth, vertical Speed of movement: fast

    Static Decentration

    Horizontal: temporal (1 mm) Vertical: Superior (1mm) Movement:

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 6

    Static Decentration

    Horizontal: temporal (1 mm) Vertical: Superior (2 mm) Movement: > 2mm, apical rotation Speed of movement: Average

    Centration Assessment Not Enough

    Static and dynamic centration assessment need to accomplish with NaFL assessment

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 7

    Fluorescein Pattern

    Fluorescein Dye

    Cobalt Blue Filter

    Yellow Wratten Filter

    WrattenWrattenCobaltCobalt

    Fluorescein Patterns Interpretation

    Central

    Mid-peripheral

    Edge lift

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 8

    Central Steep Fit

    BC = 7.65mm Central pooling, mid-peripheral touch Edge-lift tight

    Central Slightly Steep Fit

    BC = 7.85mm Slight central pooling, mid-peripheral clearance Edge-lift tight

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 9

    Central Alignment Fit

    BC = 7.95mm Central clearance, mid-peripheral clearance Edge-lift sufficient

    Central Slightly Flat Fit

    BC = 8.05mm Central touch, mid-peripheral pooling Edge-lift sufficient

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 10

    Central Flat Fit

    BC = 8.15mm Central touch, mid-peripheral pooling Edge-lift excessive

    Peripheral Assessment

    Edge-lift width

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 11

    Tight Edge-lift

    Thin NaFL, dull reflection Width < 0.2mm No tear exchange

    Loose Edge-lift

    Thick NaFL, bright reflection Width > 0.4mm Excessive tear exchange

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 12

    Adequate Edge-lift

    Moderate NaFL, medium bright reflection Width > 0.2mm and < 0.4mm Adequate tear exchange

    Comparison of Edge-lift

    Acceptable range: 0.2mm < x < 0.6mm Adequate tear exchange

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 13

    Working Through The Pictures

    Over-Refraction For most of the Over-Rx on RGP, we will

    use spherical power only. If corneal cylinder is higher than 2.50DC, we

    should use toric form of RGP. Over-Rx can help to determine the fitting of

    the lens while over or under power may indicate less than optimum fit.

    Over-Rx with more than +/- 4.00D needs to be vertex.

    Visual Acuity (VA) < 6/9 may indicate lenticular

    astigmatism present.

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 14

    Patient Comfort Rating

    Patient may not feel comfortable if he/she is the first time RGP wearer. So, the rating should be done only after half an hour or one hour of wearing.

    The most discomfortable is 0 mark and the most comfortable is 5. If the RGP can score 3 to 4 mark is considered acceptable.

    Final Prescription and Communication with the Lab

    Make sure you follow the Labs requirement and language that they are using.

    Eg, Given to lab: K-reading: 44.00/42.00 Lab will make lens with FK = 44.00 not 42.00 as

    the labs habit is that the first number is always the FK.

    Remember: Lab people are not Optometrists! Dont take for granted they will fix the problem

    for you.

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 15

    RGP Modification

    For todays RGP lenses, most of them are manufactured by computerized CNC lathe-out machine with high precision and accuracy. They are difficult in modifying or changing their parameters. BC is definitely cannot be changed with existing lens.

    OAD can reduce size but not enlarge.

    Power (Rx) can increase maximum +/-0.50D.

    Edge-lift can make flatter but not steeper.

    Problem Solving For RGP Fitting

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 16

    Progress Evaluation Procedures

    A. Lenses On 1. Visual Acuity 2. Retinoscopy (Over-Refraction) 3. Sphere-Cylinder 4. Biomicroscopy

    a. Lag b. Surface Quality c. Edema

    Progress Evaluation Procedures

    B. Lenses Off 1. Biomicroscopy

    a. Staining b. Limbal Vasculature c. Lids

    2. Keratometry 3. Subjective 4. Verification

  • 26/4/2013

    (c) Simon Lam 17

    Common RGP ProblemObjective Findings Probable Cause Solution

    Excessive Movement Lens too flat Lens too steep excessive tearing

    Change fit according to fluorescein pattern

    No movement Lens too large/too steep inadequate edge lift

    Flatten BC Decrease OAD Flatten PC

    Displacement by upper lid

    Thick edge Lens too large Flat fit

    Reduce edge thickness ( + lenticular/ CN bevel) Reduce OAD Steepen BC

    Excessive Edge Lift PC too wide or flat Narrow/steepen PC

    3-9 Staining Periphery too flat Improper OAD

    Steepen secondary curve Flatten BC Change OAD

    Thank You

    Questions?