Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Agric. Biol. Chem., 43 (10), 2137. 2142, 1979 2137
Isolation of Intact Chloroplasts from Spinach Leaf by Centrifugation
in Gradients of the Modified Silica "Percoll"*
Tetsuko TAKABE, Mikio NISHIMURA and Takashi AKAZAWA
Research Institute for Biochemical Regulation, School of Agriculture , Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464, Japan
Received April 23, 1979
The isolation of the photosynthetically competent chloroplast preparations was under-
taken by means of the density gradient centrifugation on the modified silica sol "Percoll." A
clear separation of the intact chloroplast sustaining the high photosynthetic activities (light
dependent CO2 fixation ca. 130ƒÊmol/mg Chl• hr) was established. The contamination of
mitochondria and peroxisomes was estimated to be less than 3% by measuring the activities
of their marker enzymes. The chloroplasts were proved to be free from endoplasmic reticulum
and cytosol. The photosynthetic CO2 fixation of the isolated chloroplast preparations was
saturated by illumination of the light intensity of 20,000 Lux (12mW/cm2, 400•`750 nm).
The separation of intact chloroplasts sustain-ing the high photosynthetic activities (C02-fixation and 02 evolution) is crucial for elucidating the nature of photosynthetic reaction and its regulatory mechanisms. The procedures reported by Walker1,2) and Jensen and Bassham3) employing grinding of leaf tissues in specified buffers, followed by rapid differential centrifugation, have been widely used in recent years. The preparations thus obtained, however, contain broken chloroplasts, mitochondria and other particulate fractions4) and are obviously not suitable for studying those aspects of photosynthesis research, such as photorespiration, which are believed to involve the cooperative interaction of several organelles, e.g.,chloroplasts, peroxisomes and mitochondria.5) The sucrose density gradient
technique has been widely used for the isolation
of organelles, but, although sucrose gradients
have been useful in determining subcellular
enzyme localization,6•`8) chloroplasts obtained
generally retain only limited activity in light-
dependent CO2 fixation.6,8) Morgenthaler et
a1.9 ,10) have succeeded in isolating intact chloro
plasts from spinach leaf, which retain high
photosynthetic activities (80ƒÊmol CO, fixed/
mg Chl• hr) by isopycnic centrifugation in a
mixture of silica sol (Ludox AM) and PEG.
The chloroplasts also sustained a high activity
of protein biosynthesis and the method was
thus found useful for examining the biosynthe
sis of several proteins including RuP2 car
boxylase11,12) Cyt b-55913) and coupling factor
1 (CF1).14) It should be noted that the outer
membranes of such chloroplasts were seen to
be intact.
We have attempted to establish standard
separation method for intact chloroplasts by
the gradient centrifugation in the modified
silica sol coated with polyvinylpyrrolidone,
'P ercoll'.15,16)
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of crude chloroplasts. Freshly harvested leaf of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L. cv. Kyoho) was used throughout the experiment; 35g (wet wt.) of leaf
Abbreviations: BSA, bovine serum albumin; Chl,
chlorophyll; Cyt, cytochrome; G-R, grinding-resus-
pension; HEPES, N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N•L-
ethane-sulfonic acid; MES, 2-(N-morpholino) ethane
sulfonic acid; PEG, polyethylene glycol; PEP, phospho-
enolpyruvate; PPBF, Percoll solution containing 5
polyethylene glycol, 1% bovine serum albumin and 1
Ficoll 400; RuP2, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate.
* This paper No. 50 is in the series "Structure and
Function of Chloroplast Proteins." The research was
supported in part by the grant-in-aid from the Ministry
of Education of Japan (310413, 347099, 376039) and
the Nissan Science Foundation (Tokyo).
2138 T. TAKABE, M. NISHIMURA and T. AKAZAWA
tissues were diced into small segments (1 cm in width)
and immediately homogenized by blending for 2 sec
in 120ml of 50mM MES-NaOH buffer (pH 6.1) con
taining 0.33M sorbitol, 2mM Na2-EDTA, 1mM MnCl2,
1 MM MgCl2, 20mM NaCI, and 2mM isoascorbic acid
as described by Jensen and Bassham.3) The resulting
homogenate was briefly filtered through one layer of
Miracloth (Chicopee Mills Inc., Milltown, N. J.) and
the chloroplasts collected by centrifugation at 2,500•~g
for 70 sec at 4•Ž. The crude chloroplast preparation
was resuspended in 5ml of the grinding medium.
Gradient centrifugation in Percoll. Five g of PEG
6000 (Sigma, St. Louis), 1g of BSA (Sigma, St. Louis),
and 1g of Ficoll 400 (Pharmacia Fine Chemicals,
Uppsala) were dissolved in 100ml of Percoll (Pharmacia
Fine Chemicals, Uppsala). This mixture was referred
to as PPBF throughout the paper. The density of
PPBF was 1.142g/cm3. A linear gradient of 11 to
90% (v/v) PPBF was made by a Hitachi DGK-U
automatic density gradient maker. The gradient
solution contained in addition 0.33m sorbitol, 2mM
Na2-EDTA, 1mM MnC12, 1mM MgCI, 1mM Na-
pyrophosphate, 5mM isoascorbic acid, 5mM•Ž gluta
thione, and 50mM HEPES-NaOH buffer (pH 6.8),
which was referred to as G-R ('grinding-resuspension')
medium.9) Two ml of the crude chloroplast prepa
ration were loaded onto 35ml of a linear gradient
solution and centrifuged in a Beckman SW-27 swinging
bucket type rotor at 7,000rpm for 15 min; the maximal
centrifugal field was 8,820•~g. After centrifugation,
the chloroplast fractions in the 35 ml gradient were
harvested by aspiration into a centrifuge tube, diluted
3 fold with the G-R medium, and sedimented again
under the same conditions as described in the prepa
ration of crude chloroplast. The chloroplast prepa
ration thus obtained was resuspended in the G-R
medium and stored in an ice bath until used. Al-
ternatively, 0.9ml fractions were collected from 35-m1
centrifuge tubes, and aliquots were used for measure
ments of the enzyme activities.
Enzyme assays. (a) RuP2 carboxylase (EC 4.1.1. 39) activity was measured as described by Nishimura et al.17) (b) Cyt c oxidase (EC 1.9.3.1) activity was determined by measuring the decrease of the absorbance at 550nm due to the formation of reduced Cyt c according to the method of Smith.18) (c) Catalase (EC 1.11.16) was assayed by measuring the disappearance of H202 spectrophotometrically at 240nm following the method of Luck.19) (d) The assay method for NADPH-Cyt c reductase of Lord et al.21) was employed
after a slight modification. The reaction mixture contained in a total volume of 1ml; 20mM K-phosphate
(pH 8.0), 0.2mM NADPH, 0.02mM Cyt c, and 10mM KCN. The reaction was started by adding NADPH , and the reduction of Cyt c was monitored at 550n
m using a Gilford Model 240 recording spectrophotometer.
(e) NADH-nitrate oxidoreductase (EC 1.6.1.1) activity
was measured as Hageman and Hucklesby.21) The
reaction mixture contained in a total volume of 1ml;
25 mm K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), 0.4mM KNO3i
and 0.1mM NADH. The reaction was started by
adding NADH at 30•Ž. After 15min, the reaction
was stopped by adding 1% (w/v) sulfanylamide in
1.5N HCl. Then 1ml of 0.02% (w/v) N-(1-naphthyl)-
ethylenediamine-HCI was added and allowed to stand
for 10min. One ml of 20% cold trichloroacetic acid
was then added to the mixture. After the centrifugation
at 3,000•~g for 10 min, the absorption at 540nm was
measured. Control experiments were done without
NADH. (f) PEP carboxylase (EC 4.1.1.31) activity
was measured as described by Maruyama et al.22)
The reaction mixture contained in a total volume of
1 ml, 80mM Tris-HCI (pH 7.8), 10 mat NaH14C03
(0.2 mCi/mmol), 2mM PEP, 2mM MgC12, 5mM gluta-
thione, 0.2mM NADH, and 14 units of malate dehydro
genase. The reaction was started by adding PEP at
30•Ž. After 15 min, the reaction was stopped by
adding 50ƒÊl of acetic acid. The reaction mixture was
dried at 85•Ž for 60 min and radioactivity measured
in a Packard liquid scintillation spectrometer.
Analytical methods. Chl content was determined according to the method of Walker.28) Measurements of the density of Percoll solution were carried out using an ATAGO refractometer (Tokyo) . It was confirmed that the refractive index is directly proportional to the density of the Percoll solution.
Photosynthetic 14C02 fixation and 02 evolution.
Photosynthetic C02 fixation and 02 evolution were
measured basically following the procedures reported
by Cockburn et al.24) The reaction mixture (final
volume lml) contained: 50 trim HEPES-NaOH (pH 8 .0),
0.33 M sorbitol, 2mM Na2-EDTA, 1mM MnCl2, 1mM
MgCl2, 10mM NaH14CO3 (0 .5mCi/mmol) and chloro
plasts (1020 tog Chl). The reaction was started by
adding NaH14C03 at 25•Ž and incubation continued
for varied periods. The radioactivities fixed were
measured in a liquid scintillation spectrometer .
Photosynthetic 02 evolution was measured using
a Rank Bros. oxygen electrode. Illumination was
provided by a white tungsten lamp (200 W). Unless
otherwise indicated, light intensity was 30,000 Lux
(14mW/em2 of 400•`750nm) which is saturating the
photosynthetic reaction under the conditions presently
employed.
For the purpose of calculating the percentage con
tamination of the broken chloroplasts in the intact
chloroplast preparations, the method of Heber and
Santarius25) was employed.
Isolation of Spinach Chloroplasts in Percoll Gradients 2139
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
After rapid disruption of spinach leaf tissues
in a blendor, the crude chloroplasts obtained
by centrifugation at 2500•~g were layered on
top of a gradient solution of 1•`90% (v/v)
PPBF solution. After an additional centri
fugation at 8820•~g for 15min, two Chl-
containing bands were separated, the lower
band containing intact chloroplasts and the
upper one broken chloroplasts. Figure 1
shows the separation profile of chloroplasts,
the density of intact and broken chloroplasts
being 1.14g/cm3 and 1.09g/cm3, respectively.
Without the addition of PEG 6000, we found
that the separation of two types of chloro
plasts is somewhat incomplete. Although the
density of each fraction was slightly larger than
that reported by Morgenthaler et al.9)using
FIG. 1. Localization of Enzyme Activities in the
Separated Fractions by Percoll Density Gradient
Centrifugation.
Fractions separated by Percoll gradient centrifugation were subjected to the following assays: A, Chl and density; B, RuP2 carboxylase; C, Cyt c oxidase and catalase. Experimental details for the Percoll density
gradient centrifugation and the enzyme activity measurements are described in the text. The enzyme activities in 0.9-ml fractions are expressed as /4mo1 substrates utilized or products formed/min.
the Ludox-PEG 6000 gradient solution, a clearer separation was achieved in the present study, density difference (0.005) of two fractions being slightly larger than the one reported by the former workers. It will be noted that RuP2 carboxylase, a chloroplast marker enzyme, is localized exclusively in the intact chloro
plasts, while Cyt c oxidase activity is detectable near to the broken chloroplast fraction. The density at which mitochondria are located is 1.07 (g/cm3), somewhat larger than the buoyant density of mitochondria reported for spinach isolated in Ludox HS.15) On the other hand, catalase, a peroxisomal marker enzyme, was localized on top of the gradient.
The degree of contamination of mitochondria and peroxisomes in both crude and
purified intact chloroplasts was tested by assaying the activities of the individual marker enzymes. As presented in Table I, the presence of catalase activities detectable in the crude preparation (13% of the total activity) has drastically reduced to 1.4% in the preparation of intact chloroplasts. Similarly the crude preparations of chloroplasts contained about 22% of the total Cyt c oxidase activities, but this contamination was reduced to 2.8 after recovery from the Percoll gradient. One third of the total NADPH-Cyt c reductase, a marker enzyme of the endoplasmic reticulum, was found in the crude preparation, but was barely detectable in the intact chloroplasts. Reardon et al.281 have found no nitrate reduc-tase activity, which is a cytoplasmic marker,
TABLE I. ENZYME CONTENTS IN INTACT
CHLOROPLASTS SEPARATED BY PERCOLL
GRADIENT CENTRIFUGATION
N.D.: not detectable.
2140 T. TAKABE, M. NISHIMURA and T. AKAZAWA
in the intact chloroplasts isolated by density
gradient centrifugation on Ludox AM. We also tested the contamination of cytosol by assaying nitrate reductase and PEP carboxylase activities, which are believed to be localized in the cytoplasm of C, mesophyll cells.27) These activities were not detectable in the prepa rations of intact chloroplasts. It has often been pointed out4) that the plastids separated by the sedimentation velocity or isopycnic centrifugation techniques contain as much 10% as contaminated mitochondria and micro-bodies. However, Miflin and Beevers28) re
ported that the plastid fraction separated by a relatively brief centrifugation on a semi-linear sucrose gradient contains less than 2 of the contaminated microbodies and mitochondria. The results given in Table I appear, therefore, to show that the isolated chloro
plasts from spinach leaf tissues are pure. The preparations were inspected by a phase-contrast microscope. Photograph of Fig. 2 shows the typical, refractile appearance of chloroplast having an intact envelope.
From the results of the measurements of
the Hill-reaction with ferricyanide as electron
FIG. 2. Intact Chloroplasts Seen Under Phase Con
trast Light Microscope (Bar is 10ƒÊm).
acceptor, the preparation thus obtained was found to contain approximately 90% of "Class I" chloroplasts .
The high photosynthetic activities of the
intact chloroplasts in comparison with those
of the crude preparations are shown in Fig. 3
(A; 0, evolution and B; CO, fixation). The
photosynthetic activities showed a linear in-
crease up to 10 min incubation, and the maxi
mal activity was calculated to be 130ƒÊmol
CO, fixed/mg Chl -hr.
FIG. 3. Photosynthetic 02 Evolution (A) and C02 Fixation (B) by Intact Chloroplasts .
Light-dependent C02 fixation and 02 evolution activities were simultaneously measured in the
same reaction vessel following the method of Cockburn et a1.24) Reaction was carried out in a
vessel of Rank Bros. oxygen electrode. l0-ƒÊl samples withdrawn by a microsyringe at the stated
reaction intervals were treated with 0.1 ml of acetic acid and applied to a liquid scintillation counter
for measuring the photosynthetic CO, fixation.
Isolation of Spinach Chloroplasts in Percoll Gradients 2141
Fin. 4. pH Dependence of Photosynthetic C02
Fixation by Intact Chloroplasts.
Assay conditions used were the same as that described
in Fig. 3, except that of varying pH values of Tricine
buffer solution in the reaction mixture. Incubation
time was 10 min.
FIG. 5. Activities of Photosynthetic CO, Fixation
as a Function of Light Intensities.
The basic experimental conditions were the same as
that employed in Fig. 3, except that the light intensities
were varied as stated. Incubation time was 10 min.
The optimal pH of the CO, fixation reaction was 8.0, nearly equal to that reported by other investigators3,24) (Fig. 4).
The photosynthetic activities (CO,-fixation)
were saturated by illumination of 20,000 Lux
(12mW/cm2 of 400•`750m) (Fig. 5). Spinach
chloroplasts can also be separated in a medium
whose density is intermediate between those of
broken and intact chloroplasts. Approxi-
mately 20ml of a solution containing 50%(v/v)
PPBF to bring its density to 1 .10g/cm3 was
placed on a cushion of 10ml of a solution
containing 90% (v/v) PPBF. After centri-
fugation at 8,820•~g for 10 min, the broken
chloroplasts formed a very sharp band on top
of the gradient. The intact chloroplasts also
formed a sharp band on the cushion. We find
that these chloroplasts are active and pure
nearly to the same extent as separated by a
standard centrifugation method described
above.
As the osmolality of Percoll is low (<20mOs/Kg H2O), the isolation procedure of the intact chloroplasts from spinach leaf by Percoll
gradient centrifugation is evidently feasible for analytical studies of photosynthesis and other reactions in vitro. At the same time we can expect that the method is potentially useful for isolating other organelles, e.g., mitochondria and peroxisomes, retaining their
physiological integrity. Hopefully we can ex-amine the intracellular interactions of these organelles in green cells more precisely than was previously possible.
Acknowledgment. The authors wish to record their
sincere thanks to Dr. C. A. Price for invaluable dis
cussions and guidance in connection with this investi
gation and his kind help for preparing the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1) D. A. Walker, Biochem. J., 92, 22c (1964).
2) D. A. Walker, Plant Physiol., 40, 1157 (1965).
3) R. G. Jensen and J. A. Bassham, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci., 56, 1095 (1966).
4) R. M. Leech, In "Regulation of Enzyme Synthesis
and Activity in Higher Plants," ed. by H. Smith,
Academic Press, New York, 1977, pp. 289•`327.
5) N. E. Tolbert, In "Current Topics in Cellular
Regulation," ed. by B. L. Horecker and E. R.
Stadtman, Vol. 7, Academic Press, New York,
1973, pp. 21•`50.
6) P. A. Kirk, and R. M. Leech, Plant Physiol., 50,
228 (1972).
7) C. K. M. Rathnam and V. S. R. Das, Can. J.
Bot., 52, 2599 (1974)
8) M. Nishimura, D. Graham, and T. Akazawa,
Plant Physiol., 58, 309 (1976).
9) J.-J. Morgenthaler, C. A. Price, J. M. Robinson,
and M. Gibbs, Plant Physiol., 54, 532 (1974).
10) J.-J. Morgenthaler, M. P. F. Marsden, and C. A.
2142 T. TAKABE, M. NISHIMURA and T. AKAZAWA
Price, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 168, 289 (1975).
11) A. C. Vasconcelos, Plant Physiol., 58, 719 (1976).
12) N.-H. Chua and G. W. Schmidt, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci., 75, 6110 (1978).
13) R. E. Zielinski and C. A. Price, Plant Physiol.
Suppl., 59, 8 (1977).
14) L.R. Mendiola-Morgenthaler, J.-J. Morgenthaler,
and C. A. Price, FEBS Lett., 62, 96 (1976).
15) H. Pertoft and T. C. Laurent, In "Methods of
Cell Separation," Vol. 1 ed. by N. Catsimpoolas,
Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, 1977,
pp. 25•`65.
16) C. A. Price, M. Bartolf, W. Ortiz, and E. M.
Reardon, In "Methodological Surveys in Bio
chemistry," Vol. 9, ed. by E. Reid, Ellis Horwood
Ltd., Chichester, U. K. 1979, in press
17) M. Nishimura, T. Takabe, T. Sugiyama, and T.
Akazawa, J. Biochem., 74, 945 (1973).
18) Z. Smith, Methods Biochem. Anal., 2, 427 (1955).
19) H. Luck, In "Methods of Enzymatic Analysis,"
ed. by H. U. Bergmeyer, Academic Press, New
York, 1965, pp. 885-894.
20) J. M. Lord, T. Kagawa, T. S. Moore, and H. Beevers, J. Cell Biol., 57, 659 (1973).
21) R. H. Hageman and D. P. Hucklesby, Methods in Enzymology, 23A, 491 (1971).
22) H. Maruyama, R. L. Easterday, H. C. Chang, and M. D. Lane, J. Biol. Chem., 241, 2405 (1966).
23) D. A. Walker, Methods in Enzymol., 23A, 211 (1971).
24) W. Cockburn, D. A. Walker, and C. W. Baldry, Plant Physiol., 43, 1415 (1968).
25) U. Heber and K. A. Santarius, Z. Naturforsch., 25b, 718 (1970).
26) E. M. Reardon, M. Bartolf, W. Ortiz, D. Santoro, R. Zielinski, and C. A. Price, In "Chloroplast Development," ed. by G. Akoyunoglou et al., Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, 1978, pp. 277 " 282.
27) M. D. Hatch and C. B. Osmond, In "Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology (New Series)," Vol. III, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976, pp. 144-184
28) B. J. Miflin and H. Beevers, Plant Physiol., 53, 870(1974).