Raising self-preparedness and self-protection to reduce ...gebrada.upc.es/anywhere/the-project/wp-content/uploads...2016/06/08 · Thanksa lotfor your attention! Jens Pottebaum [email protected]

Raising self-preparedness and self-protection to reduce population vulnerability

WP5 overview, challenges,objectives next 6 months

Dr.-Ing. Jens PottebaumProf. Dr.-Ing. Rainer KochTherese FribergRobin MartererChristina SchäferMatthias Moi

ANYWHERE Kickoff MeetingBarcelona/Sitges, 08.06.2016

Paderborn University / C.I.K. 08.06.2016 ANYWHERE Kickoff Meeting Dr.-Ing. Jens Pottebaum

Outline

Ø Motivation for the Work Package

Ø Objectives and corresponding tasks

Ø Case studies

Ø Main challenges

Ø First activities

2


Some major terms…

Ø Self-preparedness§ Activities to limit own vulnerability and exposure§ Undertaken when no actual danger is perceived

Ø Self-protection§ Activities to limit own vulnerability and exposure§ Undertaken when an actual danger is perceived

3

Ø General public§ Citizens: Every person in the EU, being at home or in an organisation§ Organisations: Every organisation in the EU, existing for a certain purpose

• Companies/Enterprises (hopefully having business continuity plans) including, for instance, Critical Infrastructures

• Emergencies services and governmental institutions ensuringprofessional preparedness and response/protection


Motivation

Ø Citizens and companies want to rely on ‘official‘ information, but…

4

Ø If this is not available when they feel (potentially) endangered, they will utilise what they can get

Ø From WP1 to WP4 we will have knowledge, products and services ready

Ø How can they be used to support self-preparedness and self-protection,at least to raise awareness in both phases?

Ø How can we transfer this into new and additional business cases?

http://www.crisis360.com/https://thesunshine.co/ http://www.rescuelab.de


WP5: A second perspective in ANYWHERE

Ø Full crisis management cycle

Ø Pro-active and reactive actions

Ø Support for emergency services

Ø WP6: Pilots (4 sites)

5

Ø WP2: W&C forecastØ WP3: Impact forecast (MH-EWS)Ø WP4: Decision support for

emergency response (A4DEMOS)

Ø Secure Societies!• Reduce vulnerability/exposure

Ø Innovative companies!• Create business opportunities

Ø WP5: Self-preparednessand self-protection

Ø WP7: Business modelsØ WP1: Co-ownership (?)


Quotations from the DoA

Ø Expected impact§ making available tailor-made informational products with high-resolution

information to the public and to the institutions with activities at risk§ empower the public and stakeholders to take their own responsibilities § include as a major axis the public access to reliable now- and fore-casting

predictions (information, at the end)§ create the adequate conditions favouring the emergence of

hundreds/thousands of online services (some of them mobile apps)§ radically enabling the preparedness and coordination readiness of the

citizenship and of the society at large

Ø How to measure this? We simply stated:Number of self-p* applications developed during the project§ 5 tools developed by ANYWHERE partners in WP5 § Up to 4 applications developed by third parties

6


Major outcomes of WP5

Ø M5.1: Specific session to present the recommendations in the second Workshop of the project (M15). Leader: INTC (M15).

Ø Communication and crowd-based approaches supporting innovation for self-preparedness and self-protection. à D5.1 / Leader: UPB (M19)

Ø M5.2: Implementation of the products and services designed in T5.3 –T5.6 in the pilot sites. Leader: UPB (M25).

Ø Products and services of the 4 case studies, including the results of their verification during the demonstration. à D5.2 / Leader: DAPP (M36).

Ø Best practices and strategies for innovative self-p* and the summary of lessons learned from case studies. à D5.3 / Leader: UPB (M37).

7

M3 M15 M19 M36M25

StartWP5

Work-shop D5.1 Products &

ServicesD5.2

D5.3

T5.1/T5.3/T5.7 Practices and constraints, guidelines, communication and social media à recommendations

4 case studies(in WP5, later included in pilots)


Methodology

Ø A service for camping sites in flash flood areas § Camping managers § Campers themselves

Ø A service for schools located in flash flood areas§ Authorities§ Parents

Ø A service for electricity networks in storm eventsØ A service for food distribution/logistics companies

§ Business continuity§ Support for sanitary services and fuel distribution

8

Research questionsProducts, services, guidelines, approaches, …

Pilot sitesBusiness models/Exploitation

Existingself-p*productsMH-EWS

A4DEMOS Existingstandardproducts


Tasks related to case studies

Ø Task 5.3: Reducing storm-driven impacts on electricity transmission grids § Case study / Task Leader: FMI§ Contributors: FMoI, HSUH

Ø Task 5.4: Enabling self-response of the logistic platforms of the food distribution companies during severe weather events§ Case study / Task Leader: DAPP§ Contributors: UPC, HYDS, INTC, FMI

Ø Task 5.5: Increasing self-protection in camping located in flood prone areas § Case study / Task Leader: HYDS. § Contributors: UPC, ACA, INTC, KAJO

Ø Task 5.6: Increasing self-awareness and self-protection in front of flooding risk in schools § Case study / Task Leader: CIMA§ Contributors: CDG, ARPAL, CNRS, KAJO (?)

9


Tasks (w/o case studies)

Ø Task 5.1: Guidelines for new technologies and tools to create opportunities to raise self-preparedness and selfprotection§ TL: UPB§ Contributors: ACA, INTC, HYDS, UPC, FMI, FMoI, CDG, CNRS, DAPP,

SDIS2B, VOLBE, SSSA, UFZ

Ø Task 5.2: Improving communication and social effectiveness of warnings § TL: CNRS§ Contributors:, KAJO, UPC, INTC, FMoI, CDG, ARPAL,

UPB, UFZ, VOLBE, SDIS2B

Ø Task 5.7: Defining recommendations for self-preparedness and self-protection to reduce the vulnerability of the population§ TL: UPB§ Contributors: ACA, INTC, HYDS, UPC, FMI, HSUH, FMoI, CDG, CNRS,

DAPP, SSSA, SDIS2B, VOLBE

10

ElectricityLogisticsCampsiteSchool


Main challenges and first activities

Ø Understand the background and ambition within case studies§ Clarify intrinsic motivation and contribution to WP5§ Create structure with four case study sub-teamsà Initiate four specific implementation plans

Ø Detail the objectives of the overarching tasks§ Align with WP1, coordinate with focus on support for emergency servicesà Setup implementation plan incorporating case studies

à Identify the areas in which the available publicly-generated data and information has potential to create tailored made products

à Identify the legal and ethical constraintsà Identify communication patterns and distribution channels based on

current and previous projects (e.g., EmerGent, TACTIC, COSMIC, EPIC)à Identify communication needs of different user groups

(incl. vulnerability and risk assessment)

11

Paderborn University / C.I.K. 08.06.2016 ANYWHERE Kickoff Meeting Dr.-Ing. Jens Pottebaum 12

Thanks a lot for your attention!

Jens [email protected]+49 (5251) 60-2234


Research approach – Task 5.1

Ø Objective: § Reflect about interest of using channels and to allow the emergence of

services oriented towards self-preparedness and self-protection§ Show significant additional support to the emergency operations

and the response of the Civil Protection and legal authorities

Ø Activities§ identify the areas in which the available publicly-generated data and

information has potential to create tailored made products§ identify the legal and ethical constraints§ propose a framework in which to demonstrate that authorized stakeholders

can provide these applications to the interested organisations and citizens with no contradiction with the “single official voice principle” for the legal alerts

Ø Summarize as a list of guidelines (M15)

13



Ø Objective: § Achieve valid communication patterns integrating end-users information

needs with respect to their daily life space-time constraints and their ability to promptly and effectively respond to avoid dangerous situations

Ø Activities§ Identification of communication patterns and distribution channels based on

current and previous projects (e.g., EmerGent, TACTIC, COSMIC, EPIC) • between all actors • including all modes and types of media.

§ Identification of communication needs of different user groups incl. vulnerability and risk assessment

§ Derive recommendations and assess them through semi-structured interviews and on-line surveys

Ø Recommendations to be tested during the demonstration period in the selected pilot sites (documented in D5.1 in M19)

14



Ø Objective§ Summarize and analyse findings from case studies

Ø Activities§ Apply and test outputs of T5.1 and T5.2 within the four case studies§ Define the recommendations for citizens, enterprises, and other

organizations• best practices• lessons learned• strategies for innovative self-preparedness and self-protection.

Ø Recommendations to raise the self-preparedness and self-protection of the population (D5.3 in M37)

15

Documents

Raising self-preparedness and self-protection to reduce ...gebrada.upc.es/anywhere/the-project/wp-content/uploads...2016/06/08 · Thanksa lotfor your attention! Jens Pottebaum [email protected]