18
RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga L. Sarmiento Rodrigo Reis

RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION

Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010

Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010

Heather TurnerOlga L. Sarmiento

Rodrigo Reis

Page 2: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

Agenda

-Resultados de la encuesta realizada por ACSM

-Resultados de las recomendaciones del uso de IPAQ en LA con base en la experiencia de Colombia y Brazil

-Resultados del proyecto Ciclovía como programa de salud pública

-Resultados del análisis de redes

- Discusión en el comité de las estrategias del comité para el desarrollo de redes de investigación en RAFA

Page 3: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

Preliminary Research Survey Result Highlights

-Survey link was sent to all RAFA member organizations and individuals who participated in previous RAFA meetings / workshops

-45 people participated.  41 completed the Spanish version, 3 completed the Portuguese version and 1 completed the English version.

-A large percentage of those completing the survey (64.9%) were RAFA members

-Professional backgrounds of those responding were varied with most being Professor/Researchers (43.6%); Physicians (15.4%) and Physical Educators (15.4%)

-74.4% of those responding have been involved in physical activity related research for one (1) to ten (10) years.

Page 4: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

Preliminary Research Survey Result Highlights

1. Location Program & Strategies (e.g. worksite, community, church, school)

2. Population Programs & Strategies (e.g. children, youth, women, older adults, people with disabilities)

3. Basic Science Issues

4. Evaluation or Measurement

5. Behavioral and Behavior Change

6. Public Policy

7. Environment

When asked to identify their current research areas in physical activity by priority area, the areas were ranked in the following order with one (1) being the top priority:

Page 5: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

Preliminary Research Survey Result Highlights

Describe the level of physical activity research in your country over the last five years.

5%

16%

65%

3% 0%11%

Little to declining

Little with no change

Little but beginning to grow

Large but declining

Large and remaining steady

Large and growing

Page 6: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

Preliminary Research Survey Result Highlights

Describe the level of physical activity research in your institution over the last five years.

11%

8%

5%

68%

3%

5%0%

No research at myinstitutionLittle but declining

Little with no change

Little but beginning to grow

Large but declining

Large and remaining steady

Large and growing

Page 7: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

Preliminary Research Survey Result Highlights

FUNDING

- 83.3% DO NOT receive external funding for their research

- 8.1% receive external funding but it is less than $5000 USD

Page 8: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

Preliminary Research Survey Result Highlights

• Conduct workshops and training in research - 17.2%

• Develop publications and other print materials - 12.3%

• Provide information on a Web site -11.7%

• Connect researchers, groups and organizations in my country with those in other countries - 17.8%

• Encourage institutions/networks with significant research activity to cooperate and assist other institutions/networks with less research activity - 17.8%

• Advocate with international funding agencies to have a greater focus on funding physical activity research in RAFA countries - 20.9%

• Other – 2.5%

What could RAFA do that would most assist physical activity research in your country?

Page 9: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

IPAQ

Lessons learned after 10 years of IPAQ use in Brazil and ColombiaPedro C Hallal, Luis Fernando Gomez, Felipe Lobelo, Janeth Mosquera, Alex A Florindo, Rodrigo S Reis, Olga L Sarmiento, Michael Pratt, Diana Parra-Perez. JPAH in press

http://www.ipaq.ki.se/downloads.htm

• Métodos– Revisión de la literatura del uso de IPAQ en Latino América– Octubre del 2008 el CDC/WHO Collaborating Center for Physical Activity and Health realizó

un taller donde investigadores de Colombia y Brazil discutieron las lecciones aprendidas de la implementación, validación y análisis del IPAQ en Colombia y Brazil.

• Resultados – IPAQ se ha utilizado en encuestas a 75,000 individuos de Brazil y Colombia

• Recomendaciones– Se recomienda la utilización del IPAQ en adultos.– Se recomienda sólo la utilización de los módulos de tiempo libre y transporte – El uso del IPAQ corto es limitado. Solo se recomienda si los estudios previos de vigilancia

epidemiológica lo han utilizado en como línea de base.

Page 10: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

Ciclovías como programas de salud pública

• Existe evidencia preliminar y limitada de la asociación entre Ciclovías y salud pública. Sin embargo, es necesario realizar estudios y comparaciones transnacionales para evaluar su efectividad en salud.

• La rápida expansión y diferentes estadíos de las Ciclovías

proveen una oportunidad única para esta evaluación– Desarrollo de instrumentos para comparación y evaluación– Diseño de estudios de efectividad basados en la comunidad que

evaluen multiples niveles e involucren múltiples sectores con el fin de guiar decisiones basados en la evidencia.

– Sarmiento OL, Torres A, Jacoby E, Pratt M, Schmid T, Stierling G. The Ciclovía-recreativa: a mass recreational program with public health potential. JPAH in press

Page 11: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

• Desarrollo del Manual

• Con base en la información de la revisión sistemática se recolectó información para el manual.

• Desarrollo de un manual apoyado de material de multimedia.

1. Planeación

2. Desarrollo

3. Ejecución

4. Abogar por la Ciclovía y evaluación

• Evaluación a directores o exdirectores de Ciclovías, expertos en transporte, expertos en AF (9 países)

Page 12: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

Taller

• El Primer Taller de Planeación e Implementación de Programas de Ciclovías Recreativas

• Represntates de programas en estadíso de desarrollo e implementación de Brasil, Uruguay, El Salvador, Argentina, Estados Unidos, Bolivia, Cuba, Costa Rica, México, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador y Perú participaron en el Taller

• http://cicloviarecreativa.uniandes.edu.co/• http://cicloviarecreativa.uniandes.edu.co/espanol

/images/anexos/CICLOVIASmanual_espanol.pdf• Ciclovias en zonas rurales—Jorge Correa• Ciclovia de medellin– Análisis de Costo beneficio

Page 13: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

Análisis de Redes

• GUIA– Una red con baja centralidad

• REDCOLAF– Una red con alta centralidad

• CICLOVIA– Una red con alta centralidad, multisectorial que

incluye 9 sectores

• Muevete escolar– Una red con alta centralidad, multisectorial que

incluye 4 sectores

Page 14: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

ANALISIS VISUAL (IN-DEGREE)GUIA

Page 15: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

ANALISIS VISUAL (IN-DEGREE)

SECTOR IN-DEGREE

Recreación/

Cultura/Deporte 24

Transporte/ Planeación

urbana24

Gobierno /

Lideres políticos 18

Seguridad

publica 18

Marketing /

Servicios 17

Academia /

Investigación 13

Salud 9

Educación 6 Medio Ambiente 6

Page 16: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

ANALISIS VISUAL (IN-DEGREE)Muevete Escolar

= Extremamente

= Muy

= Importante

Page 17: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

ANALISIS VISUAL (IN-DEGREE)RED DE COLOMBIA

Page 18: RAFA COMITE DE INVESTIGACION Working Group Session 1- Thursday, February 18, 2010 Working Group Session 2- Friday, February 19, 2010 Heather Turner Olga

Como puede el comité facilitar el desarrollo de redes de investigación

• 59.6% de lo reportado en la encuesta– Desarrollar publicaciones – Proveer información a través de website– Conectar grupos de investigadores y

organizaciones