55
R. T. H ICKS C ONSULTANTS , L TD . 901 Rio Grande Blvd NW Suite F-142 Albuquerque, NM 87104 505.266.5004 Fax: 505.266-0745 Midland, TX Durango, CO Carlsbad, NM Artesia, NM July 21, 2015 John H. Guenther, LHG Washington State Department of Ecology Bellingham Field Office 1440 10th Street, Suite 102 Bellingham, WA 98225 RE: Voluntary Cleanup Program ERTS # 560499, 1214 8TH AVE, Seattle\ Groundwater Monitoring Report Mr. Guenther: In this report, enclosed are the Kane Environmental Memorandums of the two most recent sampling events that include laboratory reports and Well logs for the monitoring wells at the site The previously-submitted report contains additional information that may prove useful in the review of this final report. Groundwater Quality Proximal to Former Heating Oil Tank Previously-submitted data demonstrated that that gasoline range petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in any sampling event. Also below laboratory detection limits were benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylenes. Only diesel range petroleum hydrocarbons and heavy oil range hydrocarbons have been detected above MCTA concentrations and only these compounds are shown in the adjacent table. In 2015, we found that the groundwater elevation at EMW-2 declined to below the aquitard (the bottom of the well). This event was anticipated for both wells and the hydrogeology of the site suggests that EMW-2 would be the first to de-water. As shown on Figure 1 (modified from the previous submission to show the well locations), EMW-2 is downhill and down gradient from the subsurface parking structure – which contains a dewatering system described in previous reports. Thus, EMW-2 lies within the cone of depression caused by the dewatering of the parking structure. EMW-1 shows relatively constant water levels. This well lies in the lowest elevation of the property and may be recharged from street runoff, or other sources. Samping Date DTW DRO Heavy Oil DWS 2/13/2014 --- ND ND DWS 7/3/2014 --- ND ND DWS 10/23/2014 --- ND ND DWS 1/29/2015 --- 157 ND DWS 4/24/2015 --- ND ND EMW-1 7/10/2013 12.83 911 2340 EMW-1 11/7/2013 13.9 968 1,390 EMW-1R 7/3/2014 14.78 341 ND EMW-1R 10/23/2014 10.93 170 359 EMW-1R 1/29/2015 13.13 118 373 EMW-1R 4/24/2015 13.13 269 ND EMW-2 7/10/2013 8.74 296 1250 EMW-2 11/7/2013 9.61 273 325 EMW-2 2/13/2014 8.65 170 108 EMW-2 7/3/2014 14.41 ND ND EMW-2 10/23/2014 7.74 ND ND EMW-2 1/29/2015 DRY EMW-2 4/24/2025 DRY MTCA 500 500

R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

R. T. HI C KS CON S U LTA N TS , LTD. 901 Rio Grande Blvd NW Suite F-142 Albuquerque, NM 87104 505.266.5004 Fax: 505.266-0745 Midland, TX Durango, CO Carlsbad, NM Artesia, NM

July 21, 2015 John H. Guenther, LHG Washington State Department of Ecology Bellingham Field Office 1440 10th Street, Suite 102 Bellingham, WA 98225 RE: Voluntary Cleanup Program ERTS # 560499, 1214 8TH AVE, Seattle\ Groundwater Monitoring Report Mr. Guenther: In this report, enclosed are the

• Kane Environmental Memorandums of the two most recent sampling events that include laboratory reports and

• Well logs for the monitoring wells at the site The previously-submitted report contains additional information that may prove useful in the review of this final report. Groundwater Quality Proximal to Former Heating Oil Tank Previously-submitted data demonstrated that that gasoline range petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in any sampling event. Also below laboratory detection limits were benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylenes. Only diesel range petroleum hydrocarbons and heavy oil range hydrocarbons have been detected above MCTA concentrations and only these compounds are shown in the adjacent table. In 2015, we found that the groundwater elevation at EMW-2 declined to below the aquitard (the bottom of the well). This event was anticipated for both wells and the hydrogeology of the site suggests that EMW-2 would be the first to de-water. As shown on Figure 1 (modified from the previous submission to show the well locations), EMW-2 is downhill and down gradient from the subsurface parking structure – which contains a dewatering system described in previous reports. Thus, EMW-2 lies within the cone of depression caused by the dewatering of the parking structure. EMW-1 shows relatively constant water levels. This well lies in the lowest elevation of the property and may be recharged from street runoff, or other sources.

Samping Date DTW DRO Heavy OilDWS 2/13/2014 --- ND NDDWS 7/3/2014 --- ND NDDWS 10/23/2014 --- ND NDDWS 1/29/2015 --- 157 NDDWS 4/24/2015 --- ND ND

EMW-1 7/10/2013 12.83 911 2340EMW-1 11/7/2013 13.9 968 1,390

EMW-1R 7/3/2014 14.78 341 NDEMW-1R 10/23/2014 10.93 170 359EMW-1R 1/29/2015 13.13 118 373EMW-1R 4/24/2015 13.13 269 NDEMW-2 7/10/2013 8.74 296 1250EMW-2 11/7/2013 9.61 273 325EMW-2 2/13/2014 8.65 170 108EMW-2 7/3/2014 14.41 ND NDEMW-2 10/23/2014 7.74 ND NDEMW-2 1/29/2015 DRYEMW-2 4/24/2025 DRY

MTCA 500 500

Page 2: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

July 21, 2015 Page 2 Although EMW-2 is dry, the last four sampling events, spanning the time from November 2013 to October 2014 were below MTCA levels for DRO and Heavy Oil. With the most recent sampling event, results from EMW-1R have been below MTCA limits for four consecutive sampling events. I would like to call you in 7-14 days after you have a chance to review the data. Respectfully Submitted,

Randall T. Hicks Washington Licensed Geologist #2844 Copy: John Schwartz

Page 3: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

FigurŜ м: Location of Soldier Piles and Former Heating Oil Tank (red) Upper Aquitard Surface Elevation in Yellow Boxes (amsl)Σ

Elevations of Top of Aquitard Was Not Well Identified on South Shoring Wall

206.0 206.5 Daylight

204.0

208.0

Daylight

209.0

206.5

208.75

RandyH
Text Box
EMW- 1
RandyH
Oval
RandyH
Oval
RandyH
Text Box
EMW- 2
Page 4: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD
Page 5: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD
Page 6: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD
Page 7: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

MEMORANDUM

To: Mr. Randall T. Hicks

From: Mr. Eric Nassau, Staff Environmental Engineer, Kane Environmental, Inc.

Date: February 13, 2015 Re: Groundwater Sampling 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington

Kane Environmental, Inc. (Kane Environmental) is pleased to present this memorandum regarding the

groundwater and sump water sampling conducted on January 29, 2015, at the Schwartz Company

construction site at the northeastern corner of the intersection at 8th Ave. and Seneca St. (the Property) in

Seattle, Washington. Figure 1 shows the vicinity of the Property and Figure 2 displays the site plan.

BACKGROUND

Kane Environmental was contracted to conduct groundwater monitoring at two groundwater monitoring

wells (EMW-1R and EMW-2), and the de-watering sump (DWS) on the Property for gasoline, diesel,

heavy oil, and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). The purpose of this memo is to provide detail of field

methodology used to conduct the groundwater sampling.

WELL MONITORING

On January 29, 2015, Eric Nassau of Kane Environmental went to the Property to conduct groundwater

sampling of wells EMW-1R, EMW-2, and DWS. Well EMW-1R had approximately 4.1 feet of standing

water at a depth of 13.13 feet below top of well casing. Approximately 2 gallons were purged from well

EMW-1R prior to parameter stabilization and groundwater collection. EMW-2 had only 6 inches of

standing water. EMW-2 was pumped dry, and there was insufficient recharge for sample collection. No

purging of the dewatering sump (DWS) was performed nor was a water level taken.

Page 8: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Groundwater Sampling Report 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington Page 2

Field Methodology

Field methods utilized, including sample collection, and selected analysis procedures are briefly

described below.

Groundwater sample from monitoring well EMW-1R was collected by inserting ¼ inch internal diameter

polyethylene tubing until it extended to the bottom of the well. The tubing was retracted slightly to

minimize removal of sediments that may have collected at the bottom. The tubing was attached to a

peristaltic pump, and water was purged from the well. Purge water was monitored for pH, temperature,

and conductivity. Samples were collected for analysis after the above parameters stabilized, in order to

insure the collection of a representative sample of the surrounding groundwater formation.

Water from the dewatering sump was collected by lowering a new one gallon jug (which previously held

distilled water) by a rope into the sump. The jug was retrieved and the water was transferred to sample

containers.

The samples were immediately placed into an ice-filled cooler and transported to Fremont Analytical, Inc.

(Fremont) in Seattle, Washington under standard chain-of-custody procedures.

Analytical Methodology

Groundwater and sump water samples were analyzed for gasoline by NWTPH-Gx; for diesel and heavy

oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Extended; and for Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes (BTEX) by EPA

Method 8260.

All analyses were performed in accordance with Fremont’s in-house Quality Assurance/Quality Control

Plans. Sample analyses were performed in compliance with EPA analytical methods and Ecology

guidelines. Samples were analyzed within specified holding times. All detection limits were within

method requirements and no factors appeared to adversely affect data quality.

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Table 1 displays the current results of monitoring well and sump sampling, as well as results from

previous sampling events. The full analytical report is included as Attachment A.

Groundwater analyzed from EMW-1R (Sample identification, EMW-1R:012915) reported non-detectable

concentrations of BTEX and TPH as gasoline. Diesel Range Organics, in the C12-C24 range, was

reported at a concentration of 118 parts per billion (ppb) and TPH as heavy oil was reported at 373 ppb,

both below their respective MTCA Method A Groundwater Cleanup Levels.

Page 9: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Groundwater Sampling Report 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington Page 3

DWS (Sample identification, DWS:012915) reported non-detectable concentrations of BTEX, and TPH as

gasoline and heavy oil. Diesel Range Organics, in the C12-C24 range, was reported at a concentration

of 157 ppb.

FIGURES Figure 1 – Vicinity Map Figure 2 – Site Plan TABLES Table 1 – Summary of BTEX and Petroleum Products in Groundwater and Sump Water ATTACHMENTS Attachment A – Laboratory Analytical Report

Page 10: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Groundwater Sampling Report 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington Page 4

LIMITATIONS

Kane Environmental has performed this work in accordance with generally accepted professional

practices for the nature and conditions of the work completed in the same locality and at the same time as

the work was performed, and with the terms and conditions as set forth in our proposal.

In preparing this report, Kane Environmental relied on oral statements made by certain individuals. Kane

Environmental has not conducted an independent examination of the facts contained in referenced

materials and/or statements. Kane Environmental shall not be responsible for conditions or

consequences arising from relevant facts that were concealed, withheld, or not fully disclosed at the time

the report was prepared. Facts and conditions referenced in this report may change over time and the

conclusions and recommendations set forth herein are applicable only to the facts and conditions as

described at the time the work was performed. Conclusions were made within the operative constraints

of the scope of work, budget, and schedule for this project.

Our assessment of the Property may change as new data become available, either from persons familiar

with the site or during additional site studies, exploration, or sampling. This report is intended for the

exclusive use of Mr. Randall T. Hicks, and his designated assignees for specific application to the

referenced subject property. It is not meant to represent a legal opinion. No other warranty, express or

implied, is made.

Page 11: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

FIGURES

Page 12: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD
Page 13: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD
Page 14: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

TABLES

Page 15: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

TABLE 1Summary of BTEX and Petroleum Products in Groundwater and Sump Water8th and Seneca SiteSeattle, Washington

Sam

ple

ID

Sam

ple

Dat

e

Dep

th to

Wat

er (

ft)

Ben

zene

Tol

uene

Eth

ylbe

nzen

e

Tot

al X

ylen

es

Gas

olin

e

Die

sel

Hea

vy O

il

µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l

EMW-1 11/7/2013 13.90 ND ND ND ND ND 968 1,390EMW-2 11/7/2013 9.61 ND ND ND ND ND 273 325EMW-2 2/13/2014 8.65 ND ND ND ND ND 170 108DWS 2/13/2014 --- ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEMW-1R 7/3/2014 14.78 ND ND ND ND ND 341 NDEMW-2 7/3/2014 14.41 ND ND ND ND ND ND NDDWS 7/3/2014 --- ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEMW-1R 10/23/2014 10.93 ND ND ND ND ND 170b 359EMW-2 10/23/2014 7.74 ND ND ND ND NDDWS 10/23/2014 --- ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEMW-1R 1/29/2015 13.13 ND ND ND ND ND 118b 373DWS 1/29/2015 --- ND ND ND ND ND 157b ND

MTCA Method A Cleanup Level

5 1000 700 1000 800 a / 1000

500 500

Notes:µg/l = micrograms per liter [equivalent to parts per billion (ppb)].a = user lower cleanup level if benzene is detected.ND = No value detected at method reporting limit.Shaded and Bold concentrations are above MTCA Method A Groundwater Cleanup Level.b = reported as Deisel Range Organics (C12 - C24).c = reported as Heavy Fuel Oil, indicating "the presence of unresolved compounds in the Diesel and Lube+ Oil ranges".

196c

Page 16: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

ATTACHMENT A LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT

Page 17: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

February 05, 2015

Kane Environmental, Inc.Eric Nassau

Attention Eric Nassau:

RE: 8th & Seneca - 27403Lab ID: 1501249

3815 Woodland Park Ave N, Ste. 102Seattle, WA 98103

3600 Fremont Ave. N.Seattle, WA 98103

T: (206) 352-3790F: (206) 352-7178

[email protected]

Fremont Analytical, Inc. received 2 sample(s) on 1/29/2015 for the analyses presented in the following report.

Chelsea Ward

This report consists of the following:

- Case Narrative - Analytical Results - Applicable Quality Control Summary Reports - Chain of Custody

All analyses were performed consistent with the Quality Assurance program of Fremont Analytical, Inc. Please contact the laboratory if you should have any questions about the results.

Thank you for using Fremont Analytical.

Sincerely,

Project Manager

Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.Gasoline by NWTPH-GxVolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260

www.fremontanalytical.com

1 of 11

Page 18: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

02/05/2015Date:

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.

Lab Order: 1501249

Work Order Sample Summary

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date/Time ReceivedDate/Time Collected

1501249-001 EMW-1R-012915 01/29/2015 11:00 AM 01/29/2015 3:31 PM1501249-002 DWS-012915 01/29/2015 11:30 AM 01/29/2015 3:31 PM

Note: If no "Time Collected" is supplied, a default of 12:00AM is assigned

2 of 11

Page 19: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.

2/5/2015

Case Narrative1501249

Date:

WO#:

I. SAMPLE RECEIPT:Samples receipt information is recorded on the attached Sample Receipt Checklist.

II. GENERAL REPORTING COMMENTS:Results are reported on a wet weight basis unless dry-weight correction is denoted in the units field on the analytical report ("mg/kg-dry" or "ug/kg-dry").

Matrix Spike (MS) and MS Duplicate (MSD) samples are tested from an analytical batch of "like" matrix to check for possible matrix effect. The MS and MSD will provide site specific matrix data only for those samples which are spiked by the laboratory. The sample chosen for spike purposes may or may not have been a sample submitted in this sample delivery group. The validity of the analytical procedures for which data is reported in this analytical report is determined by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and the Method Blank (MB). The LCS and the MB are processed with the samples and the MS/MSD to ensure method criteria are achieved throughout the entire analytical process.

III. ANALYSES AND EXCEPTIONS:Exceptions associated with this report will be footnoted in the analytical results page(s) or the quality control summary page(s) and/or noted below.

Prep Comments for METHOD (PREP-DX-W), SAMPLE (1501249-001B) required Silica Gel Cleanup Procedure (Using Method No 3630C).Prep Comments for METHOD (PREP-DX-W), SAMPLE (1501249-002B) required Silica Gel Cleanup Procedure (Using Method No 3630C).

3 of 11

Page 20: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403

Client Sample ID: EMW-1R-012915

Collection Date: 1/29/2015 11:00:00 AM

Matrix: Water

Client: Kane Environmental, Inc.

Lab ID: 1501249-001

Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFRL

Analytical Report

2/5/20151501249

Date Reported:

WO#:

Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext. Analyst: ECBatch ID: 9950

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 2/3/2015 1:53:00 PM51.5 µg/L 1NDDiesel Range Organics (C12-C24) 2/3/2015 1:53:00 PM51.5 µg/L 1118Heavy Oil 2/3/2015 1:53:00 PM103 µg/L 1373 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2/3/2015 1:53:00 PM50-150 %REC 159.4 Surr: o-Terphenyl 2/3/2015 1:53:00 PM50-150 %REC 168.0NOTES:DRO - Indicates the presence of unresolved compounds eluting from dodecane through tetracosane (C12-C24).

Gasoline by NWTPH-Gx Analyst: BCBatch ID: R20431

Gasoline 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM50.0 µg/L 1ND Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM65-135 %REC 198.7 Surr: Toluene-d8 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM65-135 %REC 197.4

Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260 Analyst: BCBatch ID: R20428

Benzene 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDToluene 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDEthylbenzene 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDm,p-Xylene 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDo-Xylene 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1ND Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM77.4-147 %REC 1105 Surr: Toluene-d8 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM40.1-139 %REC 1102 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM64.2-128 %REC 1100

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was requiredE Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceededJ Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit

RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits

4 of 11

Page 21: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403

Client Sample ID: DWS-012915

Collection Date: 1/29/2015 11:30:00 AM

Matrix: Water

Client: Kane Environmental, Inc.

Lab ID: 1501249-002

Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFRL

Analytical Report

2/5/20151501249

Date Reported:

WO#:

Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext. Analyst: ECBatch ID: 9950

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 2/3/2015 2:24:00 PM50.1 µg/L 1NDDiesel Range Organics (C12-C24) 2/3/2015 2:24:00 PM50.1 µg/L 1157Heavy Oil 2/3/2015 2:24:00 PM100 µg/L 1ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2/3/2015 2:24:00 PM50-150 %REC 155.7 Surr: o-Terphenyl 2/3/2015 2:24:00 PM50-150 %REC 162.5NOTES:DRO - Indicates the presence of unresolved compounds eluting from dodecane through tetracosane (C12-C24).

Gasoline by NWTPH-Gx Analyst: BCBatch ID: R20431

Gasoline 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM50.0 µg/L 1ND Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM65-135 %REC 199.7 Surr: Toluene-d8 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM65-135 %REC 193.1

Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260 Analyst: BCBatch ID: R20428

Benzene 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDToluene 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDEthylbenzene 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDm,p-Xylene 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDo-Xylene 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1ND Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM77.4-147 %REC 1102 Surr: Toluene-d8 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM40.1-139 %REC 194.1 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM64.2-128 %REC 1101

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was requiredE Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceededJ Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit

RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits

5 of 11

Page 22: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1501249 QC SUMMARY REPORT

Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.

2/5/2015Date:

Sample ID: LCS-9950

Batch ID: 9950 Analysis Date: 2/3/2015

Prep Date: 2/2/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: LCSW

RunNo: 20453

SeqNo: 389679

LCSSampType:

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 998.8 88.1 65 13549.9 0880 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 79.90 55.2 50 15044.1 Surr: o-Terphenyl 79.90 54.6 50 15043.6

Sample ID: MB-9950

Batch ID: 9950 Analysis Date: 2/3/2015

Prep Date: 2/2/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: MBLKW

RunNo: 20453

SeqNo: 389680

MBLKSampType:

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 50.0NDHeavy Oil 100ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 79.96 54.9 50 15043.9 Surr: o-Terphenyl 79.96 62.0 50 15049.6

Sample ID: 1501249-002BDUP

Batch ID: 9950 Analysis Date: 2/3/2015

Prep Date: 2/2/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: DWS-012915

RunNo: 20453

SeqNo: 389881

DUPSampType:

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 3054.7 0NDDiesel Range Organics (C12-C24) 0 0 0 3054.7 0 157.0 5.64166Heavy Oil 30109 0ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 87.50 68.4 50 150 059.9 Surr: o-Terphenyl 87.50 78.4 50 150 068.6

NOTES:DRO - Indicates the presence of unresolved compounds eluting from dodecane through tetracosane (C12-C24).

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit

R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits

6 of 11

Page 23: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1501249 QC SUMMARY REPORT

Gasoline by NWTPH-Gx

2/5/2015Date:

Sample ID: 1501248-001ADUP

Batch ID: R20431 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015

Prep Date: 1/31/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: BATCH

RunNo: 20431

SeqNo: 388838

DUPSampType:

Gasoline 3050.0 0ND Surr: Toluene-d8 25.00 101 65 135 0025.2 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 25.00 98.8 65 135 0024.7

Sample ID: LCS-R20431

Batch ID: R20431 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015

Prep Date: 1/31/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: LCSW

RunNo: 20431

SeqNo: 388843

LCSSampType:

Gasoline 500.0 80.9 65 13550.0 0404 Surr: Toluene-d8 25.00 96.6 65 13524.2 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 25.00 100 65 13525.1

Sample ID: MB-R20431

Batch ID: R20431 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015

Prep Date: 1/31/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: MBLKW

RunNo: 20431

SeqNo: 388844

MBLKSampType:

Gasoline 50.0ND Surr: Toluene-d8 25.00 97.1 65 13524.3 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 25.00 99.1 65 13524.8

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit

R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits

7 of 11

Page 24: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1501249 QC SUMMARY REPORT

Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260

2/5/2015Date:

Sample ID: 1501234-001AMS

Batch ID: R20428 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015

Prep Date: 1/31/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: BATCH

RunNo: 20428

SeqNo: 388777

MSSampType:

Benzene 20.00 95.8 65.4 1381.00 019.2Toluene 20.00 88.4 64 1391.00 017.7Ethylbenzene 20.00 94.0 64.5 1361.00 018.8m,p-Xylene 40.00 94.5 63.3 1351.00 037.8o-Xylene 20.00 92.1 65.4 1341.00 018.4 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 25.00 109 77.4 14727.2 Surr: Toluene-d8 25.00 98.7 40.1 13924.7 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 25.00 105 64.2 12826.3

Sample ID: 1501248-001ADUP

Batch ID: R20428 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015

Prep Date: 1/31/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: BATCH

RunNo: 20428

SeqNo: 388780

DUPSampType:

Benzene 301.00 0NDToluene 301.00 0NDEthylbenzene 301.00 0NDm,p-Xylene 301.00 0NDo-Xylene 301.00 0ND Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 25.00 103 77.4 147 025.7 Surr: Toluene-d8 25.00 105 40.1 139 026.2 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 25.00 100 64.2 128 025.1

Sample ID: MB-R20428

Batch ID: R20428 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015

Prep Date: 1/31/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: MBLKW

RunNo: 20428

SeqNo: 388785

MBLKSampType:

Benzene 1.00NDToluene 1.00ND

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit

R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits

8 of 11

Page 25: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1501249 QC SUMMARY REPORT

Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260

2/5/2015Date:

Sample ID: MB-R20428

Batch ID: R20428 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015

Prep Date: 1/31/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: MBLKW

RunNo: 20428

SeqNo: 388785

MBLKSampType:

Ethylbenzene 1.00NDm,p-Xylene 1.00NDo-Xylene 1.00ND Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 25.00 100 77.4 14725.1 Surr: Toluene-d8 25.00 101 40.1 13925.2 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 25.00 101 64.2 12825.1

Sample ID: LCS-R20428

Batch ID: R20428 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015

Prep Date: 1/31/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: LCSW

RunNo: 20428

SeqNo: 388786

LCSSampType:

Benzene 20.00 97.7 69.3 1321.00 019.5Toluene 20.00 93.6 61.3 1451.00 018.7Ethylbenzene 20.00 95.2 72 1301.00 019.0m,p-Xylene 40.00 95.8 73 1311.00 038.3o-Xylene 20.00 94.4 72.1 1311.00 018.9 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 25.00 110 77.4 14727.4 Surr: Toluene-d8 25.00 101 40.1 13925.2 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 25.00 105 64.2 12826.1

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit

R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits

9 of 11

Page 26: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Date Received: 1/29/2015 3:31:00 PM

Client Name: KANE Work Order Number: 1501249

Sample Log-In Check List

Kerra ZieglerLogged by:

Item Information

How was the sample delivered? Client

Is Chain of Custody complete? Yes No Not Present

Was an attempt made to cool the samples? Yes No NA

Are samples properly preserved? Yes No

Was preservative added to bottles? Yes No NA

Did all samples containers arrive in good condition(unbroken)? Yes No

Does paperwork match bottle labels? Yes No

Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of Custody? Yes No

Is it clear what analyses were requested? Yes No

Is the headspace in the VOA vials? Yes No NA

1.2.

6.

10.11.

12.13.14.

15.16.17. Were all holding times able to be met? Yes No

Chain of Custody

Log In

7. Were all coolers received at a temperature of >0°C to 10.0°C Yes No NA

8. Sample(s) in proper container(s)? Yes No

9. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)? Yes No

Special Handling (if applicable)

18.

19.

Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order? Yes No NA

Person Notified: Date:

Regarding:

Via: eMail Phone Fax In Person

Sample ID on COC is EMW-1R-012915, the sample label reads KMW-1R-012915

Additional remarks:

Client Instructions:

By Whom:

Coolers are present? Yes No NA3.

Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No4.Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes No Not Required5.

Item # Temp ºC ConditionCooler 2.0 GoodSample 3.1 Good

Page 1 of 110 of 11

Page 27: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

11 of 11

Page 28: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

MEMORANDUM

To: Mr. Randall T. Hicks

From: Mr. Eric Nassau, Staff Environmental Engineer, Kane Environmental, Inc.

Date: May 19, 2015 Re: Groundwater Sampling 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington

Kane Environmental, Inc. (Kane Environmental) is pleased to present this memorandum regarding the

groundwater and sump water sampling conducted on April 24, 2015, at the Schwartz Company

construction site at the northeastern corner of the intersection at 8th Ave. and Seneca St. (the Property) in

Seattle, Washington. Figure 1 shows the vicinity of the Property and Figure 2 displays the site plan. The

Property currently contains a high-rise residential structure shown under construction in Figure 2.

BACKGROUND

Kane Environmental was contracted to conduct groundwater monitoring at two groundwater monitoring

wells (EMW-1R and EMW-2), and the de-watering sump (DWS) on the Property for gasoline, diesel,

heavy oil, and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). The purpose of this memo is to provide detail of field

methodology used to conduct the groundwater sampling.

WELL MONITORING

On April 24, 2015, Eric Nassau of Kane Environmental went to the Property to conduct groundwater

sampling of wells EMW-1R, EMW-2, and DWS. Well EMW-1R had approximately 4.3 feet of standing

water at a depth of 13.02 feet below top of well casing. Approximately 3 gallons were purged from well

EMW-1R prior to groundwater collection. EMW-2 had only 2 inches of standing water. No groundwater

was collected from EMW-2. No purging of the dewatering sump (DWS) was performed nor was a water

level taken.

Page 29: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Groundwater Sampling Report 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington Page 2

Field Methodology

Field methods utilized, including sample collection, and selected analysis procedures are briefly

described below.

Groundwater sample from monitoring well EMW-1R was collected by inserting ¼ inch internal diameter

polyethylene tubing until it extended to the bottom of the well. The tubing was retracted slightly to

minimize removal of sediments that may have collected at the bottom. The tubing was attached to a

peristaltic pump, and water was purged from the well. Samples were collected for analysis after purging

more than three (3) well volumes, in order to insure the collection of a representative sample of the

surrounding groundwater formation.

Water from the dewatering sump was collected by lowering a new one gallon jug (which previously held

distilled water) by a rope into the sump. The jug was retrieved and the water was transferred to sample

containers.

The samples were immediately placed into an ice-filled cooler and transported to Fremont Analytical, Inc.

(Fremont) in Seattle, Washington under standard chain-of-custody procedures.

Analytical Methodology

Groundwater and sump water samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) as diesel

and heavy oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Extended.

All analyses were performed in accordance with Fremont’s in-house Quality Assurance/Quality Control

Plans. Sample analyses were performed in compliance with EPA analytical methods and Ecology

guidelines. Samples were analyzed within specified holding times. All detection limits were within

method requirements and no factors appeared to adversely affect data quality.

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Table 1 displays the current results of monitoring well and sump sampling, as well as results from

previous sampling events. The full analytical reports are included as Attachment A.

Groundwater analyzed from EMW-1R (Sample identification, EMW-1R:042415) reported Diesel Range

Organics, in the C12-C24 range, at a concentration of 269 parts per billion (ppb), below the MTCA

Method A Groundwater Cleanup Level of 500 ppb. TPH as heavy oil was not detected.

DWS (Sample identification, DWS:042415) reported non-detectable concentrations of TPH as diesel and

heavy oil.

Page 30: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Groundwater Sampling Report 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington Page 3

FIGURES Figure 1 – Vicinity Map Figure 2 – Site Plan TABLES Table 1 – Summary of BTEX and Petroleum Products in Groundwater and Sump Water ATTACHMENTS Attachment A – Laboratory Analytical Reports

Page 31: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Groundwater Sampling Report 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington Page 4

LIMITATIONS

Kane Environmental has performed this work in accordance with generally accepted professional

practices for the nature and conditions of the work completed in the same locality and at the same time as

the work was performed, and with the terms and conditions as set forth in our proposal.

In preparing this report, Kane Environmental relied on oral statements made by certain individuals. Kane

Environmental has not conducted an independent examination of the facts contained in referenced

materials and/or statements. Kane Environmental shall not be responsible for conditions or

consequences arising from relevant facts that were concealed, withheld, or not fully disclosed at the time

the report was prepared. Facts and conditions referenced in this report may change over time and the

conclusions and recommendations set forth herein are applicable only to the facts and conditions as

described at the time the work was performed. Conclusions were made within the operative constraints

of the scope of work, budget, and schedule for this project.

Our assessment of the Property may change as new data become available, either from persons familiar

with the site or during additional site studies, exploration, or sampling. This report is intended for the

exclusive use of Mr. Randall T. Hicks, and his designated assignees for specific application to the

referenced subject property. It is not meant to represent a legal opinion. No other warranty, express or

implied, is made.

Page 32: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

FIGURES

Page 33: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD
Page 34: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD
Page 35: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

TABLES

Page 36: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

TABLE 1Summary of BTEX and Petroleum Products in Groundwater and Sump Water8th and Seneca SiteSeattle, Washington

Sam

ple

ID

Sam

ple

Dat

e

Dep

th to

Wat

er (

ft)

Ben

zene

Tol

uene

Eth

ylbe

nzen

e

Tot

al X

ylen

es

Gas

olin

e

Die

sel

Hea

vy O

il

µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l

EMW-1 11/7/2013 13.90 ND ND ND ND ND 968 1,390EMW-2 11/7/2013 9.61 ND ND ND ND ND 273 325EMW-2 2/13/2014 8.65 ND ND ND ND ND 170 108DWS 2/13/2014 --- ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEMW-1R 7/3/2014 14.78 ND ND ND ND ND 341 NDEMW-2 7/3/2014 14.41 ND ND ND ND ND ND NDDWS 7/3/2014 --- ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEMW-1R 10/23/2014 10.93 ND ND ND ND ND 170b 359EMW-2 10/23/2014 7.74 ND ND ND ND NDDWS 10/23/2014 --- ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEMW-1R 1/29/2015 13.13 ND ND ND ND ND 118b 373DWS 1/29/2015 --- ND ND ND ND ND 157b NDEMW-1R 4/24/2015 13.13 --- --- --- --- --- 269b NDDWS 4/24/2015 --- --- --- --- --- --- ND ND

MTCA Method A Cleanup Level

5 1000 700 1000 800 a / 1000

500 500

Notes:µg/l = micrograms per liter [equivalent to parts per billion (ppb)].a = user lower cleanup level if benzene is detected.ND = No value detected at method reporting limit.Shaded and Bold concentrations are above MTCA Method A Groundwater Cleanup Level.b = reported as Deisel Range Organics (C12 - C24).c = reported as Heavy Fuel Oil, indicating "the presence of unresolved compounds in the Diesel and Lube+ Oil ranges".

196c

Page 37: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

ATTACHMENT A LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS

Page 38: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

May 01, 2015

Kane Environmental, Inc.Eric Nassau

Attention Eric Nassau:

RE: 8th & Seneca - 27403-2Lab ID: 1504215

3815 Woodland Park Ave N, Ste. 102Seattle, WA 98103

3600 Fremont Ave. N.Seattle, WA 98103

T: (206) 352-3790F: (206) 352-7178

[email protected]

Fremont Analytical, Inc. received 1 sample(s) on 4/24/2015 for the analyses presented in the following report.

Chelsea Ward

This report consists of the following:

- Case Narrative - Analytical Results - Applicable Quality Control Summary Reports - Chain of Custody

All analyses were performed consistent with the Quality Assurance program of Fremont Analytical, Inc. Please contact the laboratory if you should have any questions about the results.

Thank you for using Fremont Analytical.

Sincerely,

Project Manager

Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.

www.fremontanalytical.com

1 of 9

Page 39: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

05/01/2015Date:

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-2CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.

Lab Order: 1504215

Work Order Sample Summary

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date/Time ReceivedDate/Time Collected

1504215-001 DWS-042415 04/24/2015 2:05 PM 04/24/2015 2:30 PM

Note: If no "Time Collected" is supplied, a default of 12:00AM is assigned

2 of 9

Page 40: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-2CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.

5/1/2015

Case Narrative1504215

Date:

WO#:

I. SAMPLE RECEIPT:Samples receipt information is recorded on the attached Sample Receipt Checklist.

II. GENERAL REPORTING COMMENTS:Results are reported on a wet weight basis unless dry-weight correction is denoted in the units field on the analytical report ("mg/kg-dry" or "ug/kg-dry").

The validity of the analytical procedures for which data is reported in this analytical report is determined by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and the Method Blank (MB). The LCS and the MB are processed with the samples to ensure method criteria are achieved throughout the entire analytical process.

III. ANALYSES AND EXCEPTIONS:Exceptions associated with this report will be footnoted in the analytical results page(s) or the quality control summary page(s) and/or noted below.

Prep Comments for METHOD (PREP-DX-W), SAMPLE (1504215-001A) required Silica Gel Cleanup Procedure (Using Method No 3630C).

3 of 9

Page 41: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

5/1/2015

Qualifiers & Acronyms1504215

Date Reported:

WO#:

Qualifiers:

* - Flagged value is not within established control limitsB - Analyte detected in the associated Method BlankD - Dilution was requiredE - Value above quantitation rangeH - Holding times for preparation or analysis exceededI - Analyte with an internal standard that does not meet established acceptance criteria J - Analyte detected below LOQN - Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC)Q - Analyte with an initial or continuing calibration that does not meet established acceptance criteria (<20%RSD, <20% Drift or minimum RRF)S - Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limitsND - Not detected at the Reporting Limit

Acronyms:

%Rec - Percent RecoveryCCB - Continued Calibration BlankCCV - Continued Calibration VerificationDF - Dilution FactorHEM - Hexane Extractable MaterialICV - Initial Calibration VerificationLCS/LCSD - Laboratory Control Sample / Laboratory Control Sample DuplicateMB or MBLANK - Method BlankMDL - Method Detection LimitMS/MSD - Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike DuplicatePDS - Post Digestion SpikeRef Val - Reference ValueRL - Reporting Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference SD - Serial DilutionSGT - Silica Gel TreatmentSPK - SpikeSurr - Surrogate

www.fremontanalytical.com

4 of 9

Page 42: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-2

Client Sample ID: DWS-042415

Collection Date: 4/24/2015 2:05:00 PM

Matrix: Water

Client: Kane Environmental, Inc.

Lab ID: 1504215-001

Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFRL

Analytical Report

5/1/20151504215

Date Reported:

WO#:

Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext. Analyst: AKBatch ID: 10628

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 4/28/2015 9:38:00 PM49.9 µg/L 1NDHeavy Oil 4/28/2015 9:38:00 PM99.9 µg/L 1ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 4/28/2015 9:38:00 PM50-150 %REC 192.5 Surr: o-Terphenyl 4/28/2015 9:38:00 PM50-150 %REC 194.8

5 of 9

Page 43: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-2CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1504215 QC SUMMARY REPORT

Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.

5/1/2015Date:

Sample ID LCS-10628

Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015

Prep Date: 4/27/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: LCSW

RunNo: 22045

SeqNo: 418497

LCSSampType:

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 1,001 83.7 65 13550.1 0838 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 80.09 84.4 50 15067.6 Surr: o-Terphenyl 80.09 79.9 50 15064.0

Sample ID MB-10628

Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015

Prep Date: 4/27/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: MBLKW

RunNo: 22045

SeqNo: 418498

MBLKSampType:

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 49.8NDHeavy Oil 99.5ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 79.63 61.4 50 15048.9 Surr: o-Terphenyl 79.63 64.2 50 15051.1

Sample ID 1504207-002ADUP

Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015

Prep Date: 4/27/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: BATCH

RunNo: 22045

SeqNo: 418827

DUPSampType:

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 3050.0 0NDHeavy Oil 30100 0ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 80.02 79.1 50 150 063.3 Surr: o-Terphenyl 80.02 85.5 50 150 068.4

Sample ID 1504218-001ADUP

Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015

Prep Date: 4/27/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: BATCH

RunNo: 22045

SeqNo: 418837

DUPSampType:

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 3050.1 0NDHeavy Oil 30 R100 238.6 67.5482 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 80.09 92.5 50 150 074.0 Surr: o-Terphenyl 80.09 93.9 50 150 075.2

6 of 9

Page 44: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-2CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1504215 QC SUMMARY REPORT

Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.

5/1/2015Date:

Sample ID 1504218-001ADUP

Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015

Prep Date: 4/27/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: BATCH

RunNo: 22045

SeqNo: 418837

DUPSampType:

NOTES:R - High RPD due to suspected sample inhomogeneity. The method is in control as indicated by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS).

7 of 9

Page 45: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Date Received: 4/24/2015 2:30:00 PM

Client Name: KANE Work Order Number: 1504215

Sample Log-In Check List

Erica SilvaLogged by:

Item Information

How was the sample delivered? Client

Is Chain of Custody complete? Yes No Not Present

Was an attempt made to cool the samples? Yes No NA

Are samples properly preserved? Yes No

Was preservative added to bottles? Yes No NA

Did all samples containers arrive in good condition(unbroken)? Yes No

Does paperwork match bottle labels? Yes No

Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of Custody? Yes No

Is it clear what analyses were requested? Yes No

Is the headspace in the VOA vials? Yes No NA

1.2.

6.

10.11.

12.13.14.

15.16.17. Were all holding times able to be met? Yes No

Chain of Custody

Log In

7. Were all coolers received at a temperature of >0°C to 10.0°C Yes No NA

8. Sample(s) in proper container(s)? Yes No

9. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)? Yes No

Samples received straight from field

Special Handling (if applicable)

18.

19.

Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order? Yes No NA

Person Notified: Date

Regarding:

Via: eMail Phone Fax In Person

Additional remarks:

Client Instructions:

By Whom:

Coolers are present? Yes No NA3.

Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No4.Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes No Not Required5.

Item # Temp ºC ConditionCooler 13.0Sample 13.2

Page 1 of 18 of 9

Page 46: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

9 of 9

Page 47: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

May 01, 2015

Kane Environmental, Inc.Eric Nassau

Attention Eric Nassau:

RE: 8th & Seneca - 27403-1Lab ID: 1504216

3815 Woodland Park Ave N, Ste. 102Seattle, WA 98103

3600 Fremont Ave. N.Seattle, WA 98103

T: (206) 352-3790F: (206) 352-7178

[email protected]

Fremont Analytical, Inc. received 1 sample(s) on 4/24/2015 for the analyses presented in the following report.

Chelsea Ward

This report consists of the following:

- Case Narrative - Analytical Results - Applicable Quality Control Summary Reports - Chain of Custody

All analyses were performed consistent with the Quality Assurance program of Fremont Analytical, Inc. Please contact the laboratory if you should have any questions about the results.

Thank you for using Fremont Analytical.

Sincerely,

Project Manager

Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.

www.fremontanalytical.com

1 of 9

Page 48: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

05/01/2015Date:

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-1CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.

Lab Order: 1504216

Work Order Sample Summary

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date/Time ReceivedDate/Time Collected

1504216-001 EMW-1R-042415 04/24/2015 1:50 PM 04/24/2015 2:30 PM

Note: If no "Time Collected" is supplied, a default of 12:00AM is assigned

2 of 9

Page 49: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-1CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.

5/1/2015

Case Narrative1504216

Date:

WO#:

I. SAMPLE RECEIPT:Samples receipt information is recorded on the attached Sample Receipt Checklist.

II. GENERAL REPORTING COMMENTS:Results are reported on a wet weight basis unless dry-weight correction is denoted in the units field on the analytical report ("mg/kg-dry" or "ug/kg-dry").

The validity of the analytical procedures for which data is reported in this analytical report is determined by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and the Method Blank (MB). The LCS and the MB are processed with the samples to ensure method criteria are achieved throughout the entire analytical process.

III. ANALYSES AND EXCEPTIONS:Exceptions associated with this report will be footnoted in the analytical results page(s) or the quality control summary page(s) and/or noted below.

Prep Comments for METHOD (PREP-DX-W), SAMPLE (1504216-001A) required Silica Gel Cleanup Procedure (Using Method No 3630C).

3 of 9

Page 50: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

5/1/2015

Qualifiers & Acronyms1504216

Date Reported:

WO#:

Qualifiers:

* - Flagged value is not within established control limitsB - Analyte detected in the associated Method BlankD - Dilution was requiredE - Value above quantitation rangeH - Holding times for preparation or analysis exceededI - Analyte with an internal standard that does not meet established acceptance criteria J - Analyte detected below LOQN - Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC)Q - Analyte with an initial or continuing calibration that does not meet established acceptance criteria (<20%RSD, <20% Drift or minimum RRF)S - Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limitsND - Not detected at the Reporting Limit

Acronyms:

%Rec - Percent RecoveryCCB - Continued Calibration BlankCCV - Continued Calibration VerificationDF - Dilution FactorHEM - Hexane Extractable MaterialICV - Initial Calibration VerificationLCS/LCSD - Laboratory Control Sample / Laboratory Control Sample DuplicateMB or MBLANK - Method BlankMDL - Method Detection LimitMS/MSD - Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike DuplicatePDS - Post Digestion SpikeRef Val - Reference ValueRL - Reporting Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference SD - Serial DilutionSGT - Silica Gel TreatmentSPK - SpikeSurr - Surrogate

www.fremontanalytical.com

4 of 9

Page 51: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-1

Client Sample ID: EMW-1R-042415

Collection Date: 4/24/2015 1:50:00 PM

Matrix: Water

Client: Kane Environmental, Inc.

Lab ID: 1504216-001

Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFRL

Analytical Report

5/1/20151504216

Date Reported:

WO#:

Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext. Analyst: AKBatch ID: 10628

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 4/28/2015 10:09:00 PM50.1 µg/L 1NDDiesel Range Organics (C12-C24) 4/28/2015 10:09:00 PM50.1 µg/L 1269Heavy Oil 4/28/2015 10:09:00 PM100 µg/L 1ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 4/28/2015 10:09:00 PM50-150 %REC 193.2 Surr: o-Terphenyl 4/28/2015 10:09:00 PM50-150 %REC 1103NOTES:DRO - Indicates the presence of unresolved compounds eluting from dodecane through tetracosane (C12-C24).

5 of 9

Page 52: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-1CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1504216 QC SUMMARY REPORT

Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.

5/1/2015Date:

Sample ID LCS-10628

Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015

Prep Date: 4/27/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: LCSW

RunNo: 22045

SeqNo: 418497

LCSSampType:

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 1,001 83.7 65 13550.1 0838 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 80.09 84.4 50 15067.6 Surr: o-Terphenyl 80.09 79.9 50 15064.0

Sample ID MB-10628

Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015

Prep Date: 4/27/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: MBLKW

RunNo: 22045

SeqNo: 418498

MBLKSampType:

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 49.8NDHeavy Oil 99.5ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 79.63 61.4 50 15048.9 Surr: o-Terphenyl 79.63 64.2 50 15051.1

Sample ID 1504207-002ADUP

Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015

Prep Date: 4/27/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: BATCH

RunNo: 22045

SeqNo: 418827

DUPSampType:

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 3050.0 0NDHeavy Oil 30100 0ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 80.02 79.1 50 150 063.3 Surr: o-Terphenyl 80.02 85.5 50 150 068.4

Sample ID 1504218-001ADUP

Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015

Prep Date: 4/27/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: BATCH

RunNo: 22045

SeqNo: 418837

DUPSampType:

Diesel (Fuel Oil) 3050.1 0NDHeavy Oil 30 R100 238.6 67.5482 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 80.09 92.5 50 150 074.0 Surr: o-Terphenyl 80.09 93.9 50 150 075.2

6 of 9

Page 53: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-1CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1504216 QC SUMMARY REPORT

Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.

5/1/2015Date:

Sample ID 1504218-001ADUP

Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015

Prep Date: 4/27/2015

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: µg/L

RL

Client ID: BATCH

RunNo: 22045

SeqNo: 418837

DUPSampType:

NOTES:R - High RPD due to suspected sample inhomogeneity. The method is in control as indicated by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS).

7 of 9

Page 54: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

Date Received: 4/24/2015 2:30:00 PM

Client Name: KANE Work Order Number: 1504216

Sample Log-In Check List

Erica SilvaLogged by:

Item Information

How was the sample delivered? Client

Is Chain of Custody complete? Yes No Not Present

Was an attempt made to cool the samples? Yes No NA

Are samples properly preserved? Yes No

Was preservative added to bottles? Yes No NA

Did all samples containers arrive in good condition(unbroken)? Yes No

Does paperwork match bottle labels? Yes No

Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of Custody? Yes No

Is it clear what analyses were requested? Yes No

Is the headspace in the VOA vials? Yes No NA

1.2.

6.

10.11.

12.13.14.

15.16.17. Were all holding times able to be met? Yes No

Chain of Custody

Log In

7. Were all coolers received at a temperature of >0°C to 10.0°C Yes No NA

8. Sample(s) in proper container(s)? Yes No

9. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)? Yes No

Samples received straight from field

Special Handling (if applicable)

18.

19.

Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order? Yes No NA

Person Notified: Date

Regarding:

Via: eMail Phone Fax In Person

Additional remarks:

Client Instructions:

By Whom:

Coolers are present? Yes No NA3.

Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No4.Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes No Not Required5.

Item # Temp ºC ConditionCooler 13.0Sample 13.2

Page 1 of 18 of 9

Page 55: R. T. HICKS CONSULTANTS LTD

9 of 9