68
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre [email protected] Quantitative Methods in Renography Radionuclides in Nephrourology, Mikulov 2010

Quantitative Methods in Renography - Pages - Homenucleus.iaea.org/.../Quantitative_Methods_in_Renography.pdfQuantitative Methods in Renography Radionuclides in Nephrourology, Mikulov

  • Upload
    lythien

  • View
    219

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Richard LawsonCentral Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

[email protected]

Quantitative Methods in Renography

Radionuclides in Nephrourology, Mikulov 2010

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Overview• Problems of quantifying the renogram• Complex shape of the curve• Unwanted background

• Background subtraction• Recognising correct subtraction

Tissue and vascular background components• Compare two solutions• Rutland plot• Deconvolution• Quantitative parameters• Relative function• Absolute function• Elimination

ISCORN Consensus Report: Sem.Nucl.Med. 1999, 29:146-159

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Renography• Renography is a dynamic study of kidney function• Time is the important dimension• It is the renogram curves that show transit of tracer through the kidneys• So curves are more important than the images• Upslope of curves demonstrate kidney uptake• Relative functionone kidney compared with the other• Absolute functioneach kidney compared with normal

• Downslope of curves demonstrate elimination

It is important to produce the correct curves

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

The Problems• The kidney activity-time curve is a combination of three factors:• Uptake into the kidney• Transit through the kidney• Elimination from the kidney

• Uptake depends on blood activity, which varies with• Speed of injection• Kidney function• Function of the other kidney • Recirculation of tracer

• Renogram curve is a superimposition of the desired kidney activity and unwanted background activity Renogram quantification must overcome these problems

Background Subtraction

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Renogram Model

Time

Conc

entra

tion

KidneyTubules + pelvis

Bladder

ExtravascularTissue

Blood

Conc

entra

tion

Conc

entra

tion

Conc

entra

tion

Time

Time

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Renogram Model

Time

Conc

entra

tion

Blood

Bladder

KidneyTubules + pelvis

ExtravascularTissue

Conc

entra

tion

Conc

entra

tion

Conc

entra

tion

Time

Time

This is the curve that we want

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Each kidney ROI includes• Renal blood vessels • Renal tubules• Renal pelvis• Overlying tissues

Regions of Interest

Background ROI includes• Some blood vessels • Some tissues

The optimum background ROI must include the correct mixture of both blood and tissue background

Blood background

Tissue backgroundRenogram}

Kidney minus background• Should leave desired renogram

Blood backgroundTissue background

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Background Subtraction

If background subtraction is correct, renogram curve should rise smoothly from zero

Kidney ROI curve+ Renal tubules& Renal pelvis

+ BloodTissue

cps

TimeBackground ROI curve

Tissue+ Blood

cps

Time

Background subtracted

Renal tubules& Renal pelvis

cps

Time

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Mixing• During the first few seconds after injection• Tracer has not had enough time to mix uniformly throughout all of the bloodTherefore blood activity in the background region may differ from blood activity in the kidney region

So background subtraction may be wrong• Therefore ignore first few seconds of the curve• Until mixing is complete

Varies between patientsOften about 30 secondsPossibly up to 1 minute

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Recognising Correct Subtraction

5 min0 1 2 3 4

Curve is not smooth during first minute

Question 1: Is this renogram curve correctly subtracted ?1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted

Answer: Under-subtracted

Extrapolate to overcome mixing phase

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Recognising Correct Subtraction

5 min0 1 2 3 4Question 2: Is this renogram curve correctly subtracted ?

1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtractedAnswer: Over-subtracted

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Recognising Correct Subtraction

5 min0 1 2 3 4Question 3: Is this renogram curve correctly subtracted ?

1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtractedAnswer: Correct subtraction – after extrapolation

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Recognising Correct Subtraction

Over-subtracted

5 min0 1 2 3 4

Under-subtracted

Correctly subtractedIf curve has a kink during first minute then extrapolate to overcome mixing phase

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Three Phases of the Renogram

• Originally renograms were acquired using probes• Without any means of background subtraction• The vascular phase was always present

• The vascular phase is not part of the true renogram• With modern gamma camera techniques it should be removed by proper computer processing

Phase 1 (Vascular)

Phase 2 (Uptake)

Phase 3 (Elimination)

Textbooks3 phases

Renogram modelNo vascular phase

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Teaching Point• Background subtraction is correct when the renogram curve rises smoothly from zeroAfter extrapolating to overcome incomplete mixing during the first minuteAssuming that the bolus appears in kidneys during the first frame of the study – time zero

0 1 min

Background Subtraction Examples

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Example 1

• 50 MBq 99mTc MAG3• Good uptake in both kidneys• Both kidneys equal function

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Example 1 – Background below kidney

Relative functionLeft kidney: 50%Right kidney: 50%

Answer: Slight under-subtraction

Left Kidney

Right Kidney

Question 4: Are these curves correctly subtracted ?1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Example 1 – Peri-renal background

Relative functionLeft kidney: 52%Right kidney: 48%

Answer: Very slight under-subtraction

Left Kidney

Right Kidney

Question 5: Are these curves correctly subtracted ?1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Example 1 – Rutland method

Relative functionLeft kidney: 52%Right kidney: 48%

L R

Answer: Correct subtraction

Left Kidney

Right Kidney

Question 6: Are these curves correctly subtracted ?1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Teaching Point

• If using MAG3 and kidney function is goodUsing different background regions only makes a small difference to background subtraction

• If both kidneys have equal functionThen under-subtracting doesn’t alter relative function significantly

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Example 2

• 50MBq 99mTc MAG3• Both kidneys poor function• Right worse than left

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Example 2 – Background below kidney

Relative functionLeft kidney: 56%Right kidney: 44%

Answer: Significantly under-subtracted – after extrapolation

L R

Left KidneyRight Kidney

Question 7: Are these curves correctly subtracted ?1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Example 2 – Peri-renal background

Relative functionLeft kidney: 90%Right kidney: 10%

Answer: Over-subtracted

L R

Left Kidney

Right Kidney

Question 8: Are these curves correctly subtracted ?1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Example 2 – Rutland method

Relative functionLeft kidney: 66%Right kidney: 34%

Answer: Correct subtraction – after extrapolation

L R

Left Kidney

Right Kidney

Question 9: Are these curves correctly subtracted ?1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Teaching Point• If using MAG3 and function is poor• Then different background regions can have a big effect

• If using DTPA this happens even with good function• Because of lower extraction efficiency

• If function is asymmetricThen incorrect background subtraction can affect relative function measurement

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Example 3

• 50 MBq 99mTc MAG3• Left kidney good function• Right kidney hydronephrotic

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Example 3 - Background below kidney

Relative functionLeft kidney: 76%Right kidney: 24%

Answer: Under-subtracted

L R

Left Kidney

Right Kidney

Question 10: Is the right kidney curve correctly subtracted ?1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted

Left kidney little under-subtracted

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Example 3 – Peri-renal background

Relative functionLeft kidney: 85%Right kidney: 15%

Answer: Over-subtracted

L R

Left Kidney

Right Kidney

Question 11: Is the right kidney curve correctly subtracted ?1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted

But left kidney is OK

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Example 3 – Rutland method

Relative functionLeft kidney: 81%Right kidney: 19%

Answer: Correct subtraction

L R

Left Kidney

Right Kidney

Question 12: Is the right kidney curve correctly subtracted ?1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted

For both kidneys

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Teaching Point

• If the vascularity of each kidney is differentThen it is difficult to find a single background region that works for both kidneys

• The Rutland method overcomes this by automatically adjusting the amount of vascular background to suit each kidney

The Rutland Method

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

The Rutland Method *• The real renogram is the response of the kidney to a single injection• Resulting in a blood activity that is continually falling

• Imagine what the renogram would look like if we gave a constant infusion• The blood activity could be kept constant

• The Rutland method predicts what the constant infusion renogram would look like• Based on the real renogram• And the real blood curve

* Rutland MD Nuc.Med.Comm 6: p11-20 (1985)

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Constant Infusion Model

Time

Conc

entra

tion

Kidney

Bladder

ExtravascularTissue

Blood

Conc

entra

tion

Conc

entra

tion

Conc

entra

tion

Time

Time

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Rutland Theory

Assumptions:

Define:

K = True kidney counts Vascular background+∫ ×+×= BaBdtUCK

aBBdt

UCBK +

×=

Now:

This is the equation of a straight line with slope ‘UC’ and intercept ‘a’

1) Input rate to kidney is proportional to B2) Nothing leaves during first few minutes3) Vascular background = a x B (where a is a background subtraction factor)

‘Rutland time’

True kidney counts = UC x ∫Bdt(where UC is an uptake constant)

B = Vascular ROI counts Tissue ROI counts(scaled for ROI size)-Blood activity

K = Kidney ROI counts Tissue ROI counts(scaled for ROI size)-Kidney activity

Rutland Plot (Patlak plot)

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Rutland Practice• Draw regions of interest• Kidneys• Vascular background

heart or spleen• Tissue backgroundbelow kidney• Bladder

• Generate activity-time curves• Subtract tissue background• from kidneys, bladder and vascular

(scaling only for region size) • Construct Rutland plot for each kidney• Select range of points to fit straight line

L R

Post

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Choosing the fit range

*** * *

*

Early points may be below the line (incomplete mixing)

Late points will be below the line (kidney is emptying)

Fit should include just points in

straight section

Typical Rutland Plot

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Rutland Practice (continued)• Calculate relative function• Using ratio of slopes from Rutland fit

• Subtract vascular background• Using factor from Rutland fit intercept

• Display background subtracted curves as usual• Guarantees that curves start at zero

Relative functionLeft kidney: 81%Right kidney: 19%

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Summary - RutlandThe Rutland plot is a mathematical manipulation of the renogram that simulates what would happen if blood activity was constant

Rutland PlotRutland TimeKid

ney C

ounts

/ Bloo

d Cou

nts

U ptake

Blood background Intercept tells us how much blood background to

subtract

Slope is a measure of the kidney function

Deconvolution

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Simple Kidney Model

Bolus Input

Uptak

e

Transit Elimination

Impulse Retention Function

Blood Activity

time

time

Kidney Activity

Renal Artery

Renal Vein

Ureter

GlomerulusRenal

Tubules

Renal Pelvis

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Mean Transit TimeImpulse Retention Function

MTTIni

tial H

eight

Mean transit time is the average time for a molecule to pass through the system

MTT =Area

Initial height

time

Two areas are equal

H(t)

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

‘Idealised’ Renogram• Perfect bolus Input• But not practicable• Perfect injection• Direct into renal artery• No recirculation

Blood Activity

time

Uptak

e

Transit Elimination

time

Kidney Activity• Impulse Response• But easy to interpret• Uptake, transit and elimination are separated

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

But what about the real renogram ?• IV injection• Slow recirculation• Blood activity persists

Blood Activity

time

time

Kidney Activity• Real Renogram• What shape is the kidney curve ? ?

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

100

50

Must be linearMust be stationary

70 3550%

Convolution

Input time

Response time

50%

50

25

Represent blood curve as series of bolus inputs

50%

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Deconvolution

Input time

Response time

50100

50

50%

100

70

50

3624

35

2518

12

50

50100

35

2518

12

50

35 25

181240

40%

28 2014

40100

50100

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Convolution

Input time

Response time

I(t) R(t)

H(t)

Bolus

I1I2 I3 I4

R1

R2

R3R4

H1 H2 H4H3

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Deconvolution

Input time

Response time

I(t) R(t)

H(t)

Bolus

I1I2 I3 I4

R1

R2

R3R4

H1 H2 H4H3

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Teaching Point• Given the input to a system I(t) and the response to that input R(t), you can use deconvolution to calculate the expected response to an ideal impulse input• This is the impulse retention function , H(t)• The impulse retention function is easy to interpret because• The initial height represents uptake• The duration represents transit• The downslope represents elimination

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

How to do it

• Matrix method• As previous illustration

⋅−∆= ∑−

=+−

1

11

1

1 i

jjji

ii HI

tR

IH

1. ISCORN Consensus report. Durand E, et al Semin.Nucl.Med. 2008, 38:82-1022. “Application of mathematical methods in dynamic nuclear medicine studies”

Lawson RS. Phys. Med. Biol. 1999, 44: R57-98

{ } { }

= )()(1)(

tItR-tH F

FF• Constrained optimisation

• Find smooth solution consistent with noise

• Fourier transform• FT of a convolution is

product of FTs

∑=

+− ∆⋅=i

jjiji tHIR

11)(*)()( tHtItR =

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Renogram Deconvolution

Blood Activity Renogram

Bolus Input Impulse Response Function

Deconvolution

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Effect of Vascular Background

Blood Activity

Vascular Background

Kidney Activity

+ Renogram

=

Not easy to remove

background

Before Deconvolution

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Effect of Vascular Background

Blood Activity

Vascular Background

Kidney Activity

+ Renogram

=

Easy to remove

background

After Deconvolution

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Renogram Example - Raw CurvesActivity-time curves

After smoothing

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

After DeconvolutionImpulse Response Functions

Relative MTTFunction

LEFT 41% 10.5 minRIGHT 59% 4.9 min

After trimming

LEFT KIDNEYRIGHT KIDNEY

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Practical Considerations• System must be linear

• OK• System must be stationary

• No furosemide• No large pelvic contractions

• Suitable ROI for blood input• Aorta or heart

With tissue background subtracted• Suitable ROI for kidney contents

• Whole kidney• Renal parenchyma (whole kidney - pelvis)

With tissue background subtracted

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

More Practical Considerations• Correct start time• Problems if kidney activity appears later than heart• Need good statistics• Use higher administered activity• Must smooth curves

But not too much• Identify plateau of retention function• Difficult if curves are too noisy• Height is used to measure relative function• Extrapolate to remove vascular background• Produce background subtracted renogram • By reconvolving subtracted retention function with blood input curve

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Summary - DeconvolutionDeconvolution gives the renogram that would be

obtained if an idealised bolus injectioncould be given straight into the renal artery

with no recirculation

Time

ImpulseRetentionFunction

transit

Uptak

e

Eliminat ion

Mean Transit Time

Vascular Background

Quantitative Parameters

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Renogram ComponentsUptakeElimination

Transit

Renogram

Time

Activ

ity Difference = kidney contents

Renogram peaks whenrate of uptake = rate of elimination

Uptake only

Elimination starts

Downslope whenrate of elimination is

greater than rate of uptake

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Quantifying Relative FunctionDuring first 2 or 3 minutes there is no elimination• So we can calculate relative uptake from:• Relative counts in summed image• eg 1 to 3 min

Difficult to get correct background subtraction• Relative area under uptake phase of curves• eg from 1 to 3 min

Provided background subtraction is correct• Relative height of impulse retention function• After deconvolution

Provided plateau can be identified• Relative slope of Rutland plot• Using linear fit

Guarantees correct background subtraction

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Quantifying Absolute Function• Absolute function is much harder than relative function• Compare kidney activity with administered activity• Using known camera sensitivity

eg Manchester method• By imaging dose syringe firsteg Gates method(Gates GF. Am.J.Roentgenol,1982, 138: 565-70)

• Compare kidney activity with blood curve• Calibrate by taking one blood sample(eg Piepsz A et.al. Eur.J.Nucl.Med. 1977, 2:173-77)

• Proper measurement requires formal blood clearance• Multiple blood samples(ISCORN Report. Blaufox et.al. J.Nucl.Med 1997, 37: 1883-1890)

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Quantifying Elimination

Time

Activ

ityIntegrate blood input and fit to uptake phase (Rutland plot)

Difference between zero output and Renogram

= Urine output

RenogramBlood (input)

Uptak

e pha

se

Urine Output / Zero Output= Renal Output Efficiency *

* Chaiwatanarat et. al. J.Nucl.Med. 1993, 34: 845-848

Extrapolate to later times = Zero output curve

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

We have looked at two Methods• The problem

• Variable input functionComplex curve shape & superimposed background

• The solution• Standardise input function

Simpler curve shape with separable background• Delta function input

• Perfect bolus injectionImpossible in practice

Bolus spreading and recirculation• Constant input

• Continuous infusionPossible but complicated

Rutland plot

DeconvolutionCalculate using:

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Comparison of Methods

• Quantifies uptake• Quantifies MTT• Facilitates vascular

background removal• Very sensitive to noise• Sensitive to timing

errors• Spoiled by furosemide

• Quantifies uptake• ?• Facilitates vascular

background removal• Insensitive to noise• Robust against timing

errors• Still OK with furosemide

Renogram Deconvolution Rutland Plot

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

Summary

Integ

rate

Blood ActivityReal renogram

RenogramKidney

Background

Bolus inputDecon-volution

Impulse Retention Function

Kidney

Background

Constant infusionRutlandRutland plot

Kidney

Background

MTT

MTT

Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre

ISCORN ReportsQuantification of the renogram

Prigent A, Cosgriff PS, Gates GF, et al.Consensus report on quality control of quantitative measurements of renal function obtained from the renogram.Semin.Nucl.Med. 1999 29:146-159.

Renal transit timesDurand E, Blaufox MD, Britton KE, et alISCORN Consensus on renal transit time measurements.Semin.Nucl.Med. 2008, 38:82-102

Renal clearanceBlaufox MD, Aurell M, Bubeck B et al. Report of the Radionuclides in Nephrourology Committee on renal clearance. J Nucl Med 1997; 37:1883-1890.