QM Information Sessions Final Audio.pptx

7/28/2019 QM Information Sessions Final Audio.pptx

1/21

Instructional Design

Dr. Ann Musgrove

Kimberly Springfield, M.S.


2/21

During this orientation session wewill explain:

What is Quality Matters (QM)

QM rubric

Discuss the QM review process

Center for eLearnings (CeL) path to QM

recognition

Questions


3/21

What is Quality Matters?

Started from a Fund for the Improvement ofPostsecondary Education (FIPSE) grant

Online and hybrid course peer-reviewprocess

Based on best practices

530+ subscribers across 44 states
http://www.qmprogram.org/latest-research-support-rubric-standardshttp://www.qmprogram.org/latest-research-support-rubric-standards


4/21

State of Florida Online Definition

80% +A course must meet 80% or more of the time online to be considered anonline course by the State of Florida


5/21

What QM is not about

Not about an individual instructor its about thecourse

Not about faculty evaluation its about the course

quality

Not about judgment its about diagnosis andimprovement

Not about win/lose or pass/fail its aboutcontinuous improvement in a supportiveenvironment


6/21

Quality Matters Rubric
http://www.qmprogram.org/rubric


7/21

Quality Matters Annotated Rubric


8/21

CeL 1001 Graduate andtaught developed onlinecourse at least once

Taught the same onlinecourse a minimum of threetimes total and at least onceat FAU

OR


9/21

Stipend of $1,000 when course isnationally recognized by QM

Cost of QM review covered by CeL

Recognition of quality course on both theQM and CeL websites

Professional development for yourteaching


10/21

Self-guided Blackboard

MinimalSupport Collaboration


11/21


12/21

Individual

Consultationsand Friday Open

Labs


13/21

Individual

Consultationsand Friday OpenLabs


14/21


15/21

What happens if I am not chosen?

Put into a queue for future considerationbased on course readiness

Can work on course using the rubric toprepare for next round


16/21

QM Peer-Review Process

Course

Submission

Peer

Course

Review

Feedback CourseRevisions ORRecognition

Once you have completed our program, here is what youcan expect during the QM peer-review process


17/21

Peer-Review Team 3 QM Certified Peer Reviewers

Pre-requisite current online teaching experience & training

Master Reviewer as team chair requires additional training

One reviewer must be a subject matter expert

At least one reviewer must be external to the institution sponsoring thecourse

Faculty member who submitted the course Access to rubric prior to review

Involved in pre-review discussions

Consulted during review


18/21

Time frames for reviews

Reviews must be completed within 20 weeks 4-6 weeks for the initial review 14-16 weeks, after initial review, to complete any

necessary revisions

QM logo provided to post in course andregistered on QM website.

QM recognition is good for 5 years, unlessthe course undergoes significant change.
http://www.qmprogram.org/qmresources/courses/grouped_by_inst.cfm?program=2http://www.qmprogram.org/qmresources/courses/grouped_by_inst.cfm?program=2http://www.qmprogram.org/qmresources/courses/grouped_by_inst.cfm?program=2http://www.qmprogram.org/qmresources/courses/grouped_by_inst.cfm?program=2


19/21

What to expect from a review Consistency and Rigor

Professionalism and Commitment

Useful and Constructive Feedback

Positive Outcomes for Faculty

Most courses will require revisions, but QM iscommitted to ensuring everyone completes theprocess


20/21
http://youtu.be/IH12bGtua-Q


21/21

Questions?Please feel free to email us with any additional questions at

[email protected]

Documents

QM Information Sessions Final Audio.pptx