34
Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics for a Picosecond Time-of-Flight Measurement 1 Introduction and Motivation Time-of-flight (TOF) detectors have historically been used as part of the particle identification capability of multi-purpose particle physics detectors. Such detectors (for example, the Run II CDF TOF detector [1]) typically measure the flight time with a resolution of about 100 ps, which, when combined with a momentum measurement in a magnetic field, is sufficient to determine the particle’s mass, and thus its identity. Recently, time-of-flight detectors employing Cerenkov radiators read out by micro-channel plate photomultiplier tubes (MCP-PMT’s) have made it possible to achieve time resolutions on the 10 ps scale (see, for example, the ground-breaking work of the Nagoya group [2]). Detectors which make use of the Cerenkov effect are generally favored for fast timing applications due to the prompt, essentially instantaneous emission of radiation as a charged particle exceeds the local speed of light in a medium. The ability to accurately measure the flight time depends on three key elements: the radiator, the photo-sensor, and the electronics. Detectors capable of a 10 ps measurement have typically been read out by oscilloscopes or single photon counters, which are not practical solutions for a multi-channel system, or a detector in a high radiation area. The fast timing sub-group of the FP420 R&D collaboration [3] has been pursuing an alternate approach, making multiple measurements on the 30 ps level. This technique has several benefits: it eliminates background from thermal noise, which is particularly important for silicon photomul- tipliers (SiPMs), an alternate photo-sensor which can have a dark noise can be on the MHz scale; it provides redundancy (increased efficiency); and most importantly it significantly improves the timing resolution: e.g. naively, eight independent measurements of 28 ps precision average to a single 10 ps measurement. The readout electronics in this scheme need to have a resolution on the 20 ps level, which is a much more modest and obtainable goal, and is the focus of this proposal. Supported by funding from the 2006 ARP program [4] and 2007 DOE ADR grant [5], University of Texas, Arlington (UTA) Professor Andrew Brandt has been leading the development of the “QUARTIC,” (Quartz TIming Counter) detector based on these concepts. Figure 1(a) shows the basic design: a proton passing through a series of fused silica bars radiating photons which are measured by an MCP-PMT. Each proton passes through all eight z segments for a given x, providing eight separate time measurements along the track (the inset shows the 4 × 8 array of bars with a 5 mm × 5 mm cross section and an average length of about 10 cm). UTA and Stony Brook have taken up the challenge of developing the full chain of readout electronics necessary to make optimal use of this detector. Figure 1(b) shows the time difference of two non-adjacent quartz bars through the full readout chain from a test beam run at Fermilab in November 2010: the 48 ps resolution implies an individual bar resolution of 34 ps, of which about 27 ps is estimated to be due to the radiator/PMT with about 20 ps due to the electronics. In this proposal we first outline a physics use case for this type of fast timing detector electronics, next we discuss the details of the electronics system, then we present the programs of work for UTA and Stony Brook, an conclude with the timetable and project objectives. 2 Physics Motivation Diffractive physics, in which one or both beam particles remain intact in a high energy collision, has been used primarily as a tool for understanding the theory of strong QCD interactions. In Ref. [3], we have proposed to use diffraction as a means of searching for new physics beyond the Standard Model [6] using the so-called “central exclusive production” (CED) process. In central 1

Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics for aPicosecond Time-of-Flight Measurement

1 Introduction and Motivation

Time-of-flight (TOF) detectors have historically been used as part of the particle identificationcapability of multi-purpose particle physics detectors. Such detectors (for example, the Run II CDFTOF detector [1]) typically measure the flight time with a resolution of about 100 ps, which, whencombined with a momentum measurement in a magnetic field, is sufficient to determine the particle’smass, and thus its identity. Recently, time-of-flight detectors employing Cerenkov radiators readout by micro-channel plate photomultiplier tubes (MCP-PMT’s) have made it possible to achievetime resolutions on the 10 ps scale (see, for example, the ground-breaking work of the Nagoyagroup [2]). Detectors which make use of the Cerenkov effect are generally favored for fast timingapplications due to the prompt, essentially instantaneous emission of radiation as a charged particleexceeds the local speed of light in a medium.

The ability to accurately measure the flight time depends on three key elements: the radiator,the photo-sensor, and the electronics. Detectors capable of a 10 ps measurement have typicallybeen read out by oscilloscopes or single photon counters, which are not practical solutions for amulti-channel system, or a detector in a high radiation area.

The fast timing sub-group of the FP420 R&D collaboration [3] has been pursuing an alternateapproach, making multiple measurements on the 30 ps level. This technique has several benefits:it eliminates background from thermal noise, which is particularly important for silicon photomul-tipliers (SiPMs), an alternate photo-sensor which can have a dark noise can be on the MHz scale;it provides redundancy (increased efficiency); and most importantly it significantly improves thetiming resolution: e.g. naively, eight independent measurements of 28 ps precision average to asingle 10 ps measurement. The readout electronics in this scheme need to have a resolution on the20 ps level, which is a much more modest and obtainable goal, and is the focus of this proposal.

Supported by funding from the 2006 ARP program [4] and 2007 DOE ADR grant [5], Universityof Texas, Arlington (UTA) Professor Andrew Brandt has been leading the development of the“QUARTIC,” (Quartz TIming Counter) detector based on these concepts. Figure 1(a) showsthe basic design: a proton passing through a series of fused silica bars radiating photons whichare measured by an MCP-PMT. Each proton passes through all eight z segments for a given x,providing eight separate time measurements along the track (the inset shows the 4 × 8 array ofbars with a 5 mm × 5 mm cross section and an average length of about 10 cm).

UTA and Stony Brook have taken up the challenge of developing the full chain of readoutelectronics necessary to make optimal use of this detector. Figure 1(b) shows the time difference oftwo non-adjacent quartz bars through the full readout chain from a test beam run at Fermilab inNovember 2010: the 48 ps resolution implies an individual bar resolution of 34 ps, of which about27 ps is estimated to be due to the radiator/PMT with about 20 ps due to the electronics.

In this proposal we first outline a physics use case for this type of fast timing detector electronics,next we discuss the details of the electronics system, then we present the programs of work for UTAand Stony Brook, an conclude with the timetable and project objectives.

2 Physics Motivation

Diffractive physics, in which one or both beam particles remain intact in a high energy collision,has been used primarily as a tool for understanding the theory of strong QCD interactions. InRef. [3], we have proposed to use diffraction as a means of searching for new physics beyond theStandard Model [6] using the so-called “central exclusive production” (CED) process. In central

1

Page 2: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

(a) (b)

Figure 1: (a) A conceptual drawing of the QUARTIC detector as described in the text. (b) thetime difference between two non-adjacent bars using the full timing electronics.

exclusive production (recently observed by the CDF and DØ collaboration at Fermilab [7]), theincoming protons are scattered at small angles and the entire momentum lost by the protons goesinto the creation of a central system. This process provides a particularly clean environment tosearch for and characterize new particles at the CERN LHC in Switzerland, which will ultimatelyhave seven times the beam energy of the Fermilab accelerator. A notable example is the exclusiveproduction of the Higgs Boson, a critical, yet undiscovered, component of the Standard Model. Ifthe outgoing protons remain intact then the centrally produced Higgs is created in a spin zero, CP(charge parity) even state, thus the observation of this process determines the quantum numbersof the Higgs (or any other observed resonance).

Apart from the QCD-based CED process, photons can be exchanged in an analogous QEDprocess. This process is calculable to a high level of precision and its measurement is thus extremelysensitive to anomalous couplings between photons and weak vector bosons [8].

Furthermore, the proton momentum measurement results in a mass resolution of about 3 GeVper event, much more precise than direct measurements using the central ATLAS detector. Thisis an especially promising approach for many “Beyond the Standard Model” scenarios, where thecross section for a Higgs coupling to b quarks is enhanced at the expense of vector bosons, makingthe proton tagging method the only approach for measuring the Higgs quantum numbers prior tothe construction of a multi-billion dollar linear collider (See Ref. [3] and references therein). Theexcellent mass resolution achievable with suitable proton detectors, combined with backgroundsuppression from quantum number selection rules, gives a viable signal and signal to backgroundratio for these models. Tagging the protons allows the LHC to be used as a tunable center-of-massenergy gluon-gluon or photon-photon collider, opening a wide range of new physics possibilities.

Forward detectors at 220 m and 420 m have been proposed for the two large LHC detectorsATLAS and CMS, and Letters of Intent have been approved by both collaborations, which arein the process of preparing Technical Proposals (TP). A 10 ps time measurement from timingdetectors on either side of the interaction point would provide a 2.1 mm vertex resolution, which,when combined with the excellent 50 µm vertex resolution of the central system would provide alarge rejection of the dominant combinatoric background from multiple proton-proton interactionsin the same bunch crossing. This ADR supports R&D for the novel ultra-high-resolution timingelectronics necessary for a TP. Without an approved TP, the Forward Physics program cannot bea recognized part of physics upgrade program of either collaboration.

2

Page 3: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

3 Scope of this ADR proposal

Several types of Cerenkov photon detectors are currently available that deliver the required timingresolution including MCP-PMTs and avalanche photo-diode arrays, also known as Silicon photo-multipliers (SiPMs). These detectors all feature rise times of 100 to 400 ps and transit time jitterof better than 30 ps when combined with a radiator that produces O(10) detected photoelectrons(like the QUARTIC detector described above). In this ADR we do not address the radiators orphoto-detectors, but concentrate on the electronics. We describe a plan to develop and study thefull electronics chain for a time-of-flight particle detector with an extremely precise resolution of20 ps/channel.

For a typical detector the photo statistics are limited. Thus, the signal amplitude fluctuatessignificantly from event to event resulting in large amplitude-dependent time shifts (time-walk) ifa simple fixed threshold discriminator is used, precluding accurate timing. Consequently, thereare two basic options given a detector with limited photo statistics: 1) employ a constant-fractiondiscriminator (CFD) followed by a time to digital converter (TDC) or 2) determine the time bysampling, storing, and analyzing the full signal shape.

We have chosen the former approach, and have successfully tested the following electronics chain:preamplifier (two mini-circuits ZX60-4016E amplifiers in series separated by a 6 dB attenuator,providing a factor of 50 multiplication), CFD (Alberta has made a custom NIM unit with a motherboard that provides filtered power, and houses 8 single channel CFD’s, based on an initial designof Louvain), TDC (Alberta made a TDC board incorporating the CERN/CAEN designed HPTDCchip that deals with all the buffering and control signals necessary for interfacing with the ATLASor CMS readout system). While this chain has proven effective, it is not sufficient.

The desired system includes the following:

• Eight timing channels in parallel to minimize time dispersion and to allow for multiple mea-surements of the same particle for noise elimination and further improvement of resolution.

• An 8-channel pre-amplification board, with 5 m pig tails to bring the signals from the detectorto a low radiation area.

• A high resolution 8-channel CFD.

• A fast programmable or hardwired majority/coincidence trigger output of a set of 8 channels,available within about 50 ns of the particle’s arrival.

• A low resolution 8-bit digital pulse height information accompanying the timing information.This information can be used to eliminate pathological events, to monitor the gain stabilityof the photo-sensor, and to correct for any residual time walk.

• An ultra-stable reference clock to be used as a“start” signal for the TDC and to preciselysynchronize time-of-flight detectors hundreds of meters apart with better than 5 ps accuracy.

• A high precision TDC.

We have searched for systems with these capabilities available on the market or under devel-opment, but without success. Fast analog memory approaches that use the stored waveform todetermine precise timing [9] are quite promising for certain applications, but generally have at leastone, and typically several, of these undesirable features: limited repetition rate, insufficient timeresolution, too large data size, not radiation tolerant, or unable to provide a fast trigger.

3

Page 4: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

In this ADR we propose to develop all the components of a full electronics readout system withan intrinsic time resolution of 20 ps per channel or better. We plan to develop the electronics asa series of “building blocks” that can be used as is, or can be individually adapted to a particularapplication. Indeed, we have already gone some way in this direction in a series of designs and beamtests of the QUARTIC detector for our use case, the LHC Forward Proton detectors designed forHiggs measurements. This has led to the development by Alberta of high resolution CFD and TDCcomponents which we will use as the starting point for the R&D described in this proposal. Wenote that for the LHC upgrades, the on-detector electronics will see radiation levels of about 1012

neutron-equivalent per cm2, so we plan to evaluate the radiation tolerance of all the components,and determine the optimal geographical layout of the different elements. Other experiments suchas Panda, LHCb, and Super B factories can all profit from some or all of this development work.

4 Work by the University of Texas at Arlington

In this section work by the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) group is discussed. UTAhas been leading the development of the QUARTIC detector, and the full time-of-flight system,including joint efforts with Photonis and Photek to improve the MCP-PMT lifetime. UTA has de-veloped significant fast timing expertise through the establishment and operation of the PicosecondTest Facility. This facility contains a Hamamatsu PLP-10 pulsed picosecond laser, various opticaland RF components, fast electronics, and a 6 GHz LeCroy WaveMaster 8620a oscilloscope. It ismanned primarily by physics undergraduate students under the supervision of Prof. Brandt withthe assistance of graduate students Ian Howley (3rd year) and Ryan Hall (worked on the projectfor two years as an undergraduate and now in first year as a graduate student). Research AssistantProfessor Seongtae Park has also contributed to the operation of this facility. In addition to overallproject leadership, the main activities of UTA will be to develop a reference clock with a jitterof 1 to 2 ps, and to perform system tests of the full electronics chain, before, during, and afterexposure of the various components to radiation. This reference clock work will be done by anelectrical engineering (EE) graduate student under the guidance of EE professors Carter and Davis(and in consultation with Jeff Gronberg of LLNL). Physics undergraduate students will performthe testing of the electronics in the Picosecond Test Facility, taking advantage of the excellent UTAinfrastructure.

4.1 Reference Clock

A crucial component of the time-of-flight system is the reference clock, used to tie together measure-ments hundreds of meters apart, as required for the LHC forward proton use case. Practically, thisis done by taking the time difference with respect to a stabilized clock signal. For the clock signalto cancel in the time difference it must have a jitter of 5 ps or less, or it would not be negligiblerelative to the proton time resolution. The reference timing stabilization circuit is based on a de-sign developed at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) by Joe Frisch and Jeff Gronberg(LLNL), who is a consultant on this project. It uses a phase locked loop feedback mechanism asshown in Fig. 2(a). A voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) launches a signal down the cable from thetunnel near the proton detector to the interaction point (IP), where it is reflected and sent back.At the IP end of the cable the signal is sampled with a directional coupler where it is compared inthe mixer with the 400 MHz Master Reference, provided in this example from the LHC RF signal.The result is a DC voltage level that is fed back to the VCO to maintain synchronization. Changesin the cable’s electrical length cancel when the original and returned signal are added. A highquality large diameter air core coaxial cable was used with a 476 MHz RF signal for preliminarytests, and the stabilization circuit yielded a 150 fs jitter over a 100 m cable. Figure 2(b) showsresults from a second test, with a 300 m cable, which was left outside to verify the temperature

4

Page 5: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

stability of the circuit. A low noise amplifier was used to boost the return signal to recover thecable and power coupling losses, which are a function of cable length (the measured attenuationwas about 7.5 dB for the 300 m cable). The unstabilized circuit was observed to have a variationof 80 ps/10 degrees C, while the stabilized circuit (shown in the figure) reduced the variation to 4ps/10 degrees C. A residual correction as a function of temperature could reduce this drift to the 1to 2 ps level, but we propose to control the temperature of the electronics, which is likely the causeof the residual variation. This should bring the drift to the sub-picosecond level along with thejitter. This temperature stabilization is important for us since the seasonal variation in the LHCtunnel is about ±10 degrees C.

The output of the SLAC circuit is a stabilized 476 MHz RF wave, but we require a 40 MHzsquare wave pulse from the 400 MHz LHC RF. This will be an input to the trigger board, which willpass the clock through to the HPTDC board for triggered events. As mentioned above the circuitwill be developed by a UTA electrical engineering (EE) graduate student under the supervisionof UTA EE Professor’s Alan Davis and Ron Carter, both of whom have extensive RF experience.Initial ideas for accomplishing this include a programmable logic chip or an ECL divider chip. Thedesign and fabrication of the reference timing circuit and the interface to the HPTDC board is asignificant area of development for this proposal, and will also require modifications of the initialSLAC circuit to ensure that the expected location of the various components are consistent withexpected radiation levels in the LHC tunnel.

(a)(b)

Figure 2: (a) Schematic of the Reference timing system as described in text.(b) Results of temper-ature stabilization test showing a mild drift with temperature (about 4 ps for 10 degrees C).

5 Work by Stony Brook University

In this section we describe work to be performed by Stony Brook in this ADR proposal. The StonyBrook personnel on this ADR proposal are Rijssenbeek, Schamberger, and technician Steffens.

The full timing electronics chain is shown schematically in Fig. 3. In the following sections, wedescribe each building block in some detail: its R&D plan, and its estimated cost. The budgetproposal for Stony Brook follows the project description.

5.1 Preamplification

In the laboratory and in beam tests, we have successfully used the ZX60 series 4 GHz bandwidth,20 dB gain coaxial amplifiers from Minicircuits[10], with low noise figures and good stability andreliability. This single-channel preamp is fully shielded and has SMA I/O connectors. Thus, it isbulky and has high cost $50/piece.

Minicircuits also offers the 4 GHz-bandwidth 14-20 dB gain ERA-5+ monolithic Darlington

5

Page 6: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

8-ch

Micro-

Channel Plate

Multi-Anode

PMT (8x4)

8-ch

PreAmp

High-Precision

TDC

Trigg

er

Constant

Fraction

Discriminators

S/H

Reference

Clock

Row

AND

Prototypes è

~5 m

8-bit

Flash ADC8-ch

Figure 3: The electronics chain used for QUARTIC in test setups: the low-noise 3 GHz bandwidthpreamp ZX60 (by Minicircuits), followed by the Louvain constant fraction discriminator, followedby the Alberta HPTDC.

amplifier in a micro-X package ($3.85/pc, 1-30 pc), which appears well suited to our needs. To-gether with various passive SMT components, shielding and cables, this amplifier will cost about$20/channel in R&D quantities. We plan to design and build a double layer (signal and ground)PCB layout for this part, with a small 0.2 × 1.2 inch footprint per channel, in an eight-channelversion. Other suitable amplifiers (Agilent, Minicircuits) may be tested as well.

As we require radiation tolerance, we propose to expose this device under power and pulsedelectronically to beam and radiation. Several test beams, at FNAL and CERN, are available to us forthis purpose, where we can participate parasitically. In conjunction with UTA, we will characterizethe device just before, during, and directly after several irradiation periods, while monitoring thedose rate and total accumulated dose. We plan to use a fast programmable pulser and a highbandwidth digital scope to complement UTA laser tests in performing this characterization.

In year one, we propose the construction of two 8-channel shielded preamp boards equippedwith nine 5 m long RG316U-DS[11] coax SMA pigtails (8 signals and 1 power), with a PCB size ofabout 2.0” × 1.5”. We will study the effect of radiation dose and of the coax signal cable runs onthe signal shape and timing resolution and jitter.

The cost of an 8-channel device is estimated at $400 not including the labor, which is suppliedby our university-supported technician. For year 1, we budget $800 for two preamp boards, and$3,000 for beam test (supplies: jigs, cables, etc.). For year 2, we budget $800 for the constructionof two final-version preamp boards.

5.2 Constant Fraction Discriminator and Trigger

We chose a constant-fraction discriminator to provide a precise timing logical pulse. This is a well-established technique, and we have an excellent baseline device in the existing Alberta-LouvainConstant Fraction Discriminator (ALCFD), which we have used before in beam tests. This 8-

6

Page 7: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

channel NIM module has a measured timing resolution of about 5 ps. Although this moduleprovides proof-of-existence, much further R&D is required.

First, a 10× receiver/amplifier is required at the input, possibly with programmable gain foroptimal adaptation to the CFD section. The CFD can be further optimized based on operationalexperience obtained with ALCFD prototypes.

Second, we must develop a motherboard – possibly in VME format – for an 8-channel system,and design and implement programmable trigger Majority-AND logic to form a coincidence. Weplan to route the fast timing signals to the motherboard which implements the fast trigger circuitry.

Additionally, we propose to incorporate a sample-and-hold amplifier inside each CFD channel.These slow analog signals are made available on the front panel for optional digitization by fastlow-resolution flash ADCs, located in the Time and Analog Digitizer module (TAD), if the triggercondition is satisfied.

The precision reference clock – the “start” signal – may also be part of the trigger condition, andwill be routed to a separate (ninth) input on each CFD module. All fast timing signals (includingthe clock), if satisfying the trigger condition, are transmitted (via either an analog backplane orcoax cable) to time digitizer modules.

We aim to develop a CFD module with an inherent time resolution of 7 ps/channel or better.The trigger logic must respect this resolution limit as well. Together with the S/H circuit, this isthe main R&D task for the CFD in this proposal.

Based on Alberta experience, we estimate the cost for the CFD and Trigger R&D as $2,000 per8-channel CFD module. In year 1, we propose to purchase two of these modules for testing and R&Dfrom Alberta for $7,000 total. Also in year 1, we will do R&D on implementing a preamplificationstep at the CFD input ($400), adding a suitable S/H amplifier for fast low-resolution pulse heightmeasurement ($3,000), and adding trigger capability ($1,000) to the motherboard.

In year 2, we propose to build two final version CFD modules based on the year 1 results.Including materials and supplies (unforeseen costs, and cables and connectors), we budget $8,000for final-version CFD and Trigger.

5.3 Time and Analog Digitizers

From the CFD, the digital timing signals enter the High Precision Time-to-Digital Converter(HPTDC) board. An early 4-channel version of this module was developed by Alberta using thehigh resolution 8-channel HPTDC chip developed by CERN for time-of-flight detectors. In the labwe have obtained a 14 ps/channel resolution, close to our design goals. HPTDC chip developmentis continuing at CERN and more powerful versions may be used in future editions of the HPTDCmodule.

Several items need significant development beyond this proof-of-existence prototype. At highevent rates the occupancy of the current HPTDC chip grows, causing loss of data: in 8 channelhigh-resolution mode (25 ps LSB), the HPTDC chip is limited to a maximum occupancy of about2 MHz. Simulations show that by doubling the internal clock speed to 80 MHz and using only fourchannels per chip, the occupancy limit can be increased to 16 MHz at less than 0.1% losses. Thiscapability is satisfactory for our LHC application (expected maximum 10 MHz trigger rate), butis unacceptable for the 40 MHz reference timing signal at the LHC; hence it too is filtered by thetrigger.

In addition, we aim to provide a fast, low-resolution pulse-height determination for pulses thatpass the trigger in order, for instance, to allow residual time-walk corrections off-line. Hence weaim to design 8-bit, 50 ns ADC circuitry (using video digitizers) which can either be implementedas a stand-alone 8-channel module, or incorporated into the HPTDC module. This ADC circuitryis the main R&D task for this digitization stage. The interface to the data acquisition will be made

7

Page 8: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

Stony Brook Detailed Budget

Year 1 Year 2

8-ch Preamp 2 pc $800 8-ch Preamp 2 pc $800Beam test $3,000

Supplies $2,075 Supplies $1,091

8-ch CFD 8-ch CFDpurchase 2 pc $4,000 redesigned 2 pc $4,0008-ch Trigger 1 pc $1,000 8-ch Trigger 2 pc $2,000R&D S/H 4-ch $400 S/H 16-ch $800R&D ADC 1-pc $3,000 ADC 1-pc $2,000

8-ch HPTDC 8-ch TDC/ADCpurchase 2 pc $6,000 redesigned 2 pc $8,000

AWG5012 $27,882

Direct Costs $48,157 Direct Costs $18,691Indirect Cost 33.75% $6,843 Indirect Cost 33.75% $6,308

TOTAL COST $55,000 TOTAL COST $25,000

configurable, so that it can be adapted to specific experimental requirements.In year 1, we purchase two 8-channel HPTDC modules at $3,000 each from Alberta (price quote

included). These will be used in tests and as basis for design of a final version that has high ratecapability and possibly includes the ADC functionality. In year 2, we budget for two final-versionmodules at $4,000 each.

5.4 Infrastructure

For this R&D proposal, we require a fast programmable pulser (for example the TEK AWG5012 2Channel, Arbitrary Waveform Generator) and fast 6 GHz bandwidth, 20 GS/s digital scope. Wepropose to purchase a refurbished AWG5012 for $27,883, see the included price quote.

The required fast digital scope is available to us in our departmental electronics shop. Ourgroup has exclusive access to a mostly university-paid, grant subsidized, senior electronic andmechanical technician. We have a well-instrumented electronics lab as well as inexpensive accessto the department’s electronics shop. We have a strong record in developing and building fastelectronics systems for other experiments: The DØ calorimeter electronics, the DØ Silicon tracktrigger, and read-out for the PHENIX Silicon vertex detector.

5.5 Stony Brook Budget

In this ADR we budget only costs of parts purchased and the fabrication of PCB, cables, etc.produced by outside vendors. Labor is supplied by our senior university-supported technician,possibly with additional aid from undergraduate students on Stony Brook URECA grants.

The budgeted Arbitrary Waveform Generator is equipment and free of overhead. The indirectcost percentage for this proposal is the same as our standard ATLAS grant: 33.75%.

6 Project Timetable

We estimate the following progression of the proposed research. We break the two-year budgetperiod into four half-year semesters.

• Semester 1: Purchase of current model CFD and HPTDC boards. Design and layout ofpreamp board. Design and test of Sample and Hold amplifier. Design of multiplicity trig-

8

Page 9: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

ger circuitry. Prototypes of preamp and trigger circuits. Purchase of reference time circuitcomponents. Begin construction of reference time boxes. Design 400 to 40 MHz circuit board.

• Semester 2: PCB production of preamp board. Testing/characterization of preamp. Layoutof new CFD daughter board and trigger/mother board. Testing of the preamp-CFD-HPTDCchain using pulser and laser. Design of Fast 8-bit ADC circuit and board. Radiation testingof preamp and other components. Complete and test reference clock prototype. Integratereference clock with trigger board.

• Semester 3. New CFD module production and testing. Construction and Testing of ADCmodule. Testing with the HPTDC. Test beam of full timing system.

• Semester 4. Further testing of operations. Characterization and reporting.

7 Project Objectives

In this ADR we propose to develop all the components of a full electronics readout system withan intrinsic time resolution of 20 ps per channel or better. We plan to develop the electronics asa series of “building blocks” that can be used as is, or can be individually adapted to a particularapplication.

Our first developed component will be a radiation-tolerant, 8-channel pre-amplifier board, in-cluding protection of the amplifiers against large input pulses. The existing CFD board will bereplaced by an upgraded module which also outputs a low-resolution ADC for monitoring the gainof the photo-sensors. We will also produce an ultra-stable reference clock to precisely synchronizeseveral time-of-flight detectors with better than 5 ps accuracy. Finally, we are developing a boardcapable of generating a level-1 trigger based on the CFD outputs, and provide a scaled referenceclock signal to the existing HPTDC board. This electronics system may be used by the LHCForward Proton detectors, and other experiments such as Panda, LHCb, and Super B factories.

9

Page 10: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

ANDREW BRANDT, PH. D.; PROFESSOR Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Arlington

Arlington, Texas 76019, 817-272-2706 (P), 817-272-3637 (F)

I. EDUCATION

College of William and Mary B.S.,Physics, Economics May, 1985 University of California, Los Angeles M.S., Physics December, 1988 University of California, Los Angeles Ph. D., Physics April, 1992

II. PROFESSIONAL CAREER

9/2010 - Professor The University of Texas at Arlington, Texas 9/2004 - 8/2010 Associate Professor The University of Texas at Arlington, Texas 9/1999 - 8/2004 Assistant Professor The University of Texas at Arlington, Texas 1/1996 - 8/1999 Wilson Fellow Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory 4/1992-12/1995 Postdoctoral Fellow Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

III. Publications

Dr. Brandt has over 300 publications in peer-reviewed journals from his research on the UA8, Dzero, and ATLAS Collaborations.

Five publications related to building detectors • “The FP420 R&D Project: Higgs and New Physics with Forward Protons at the LHC,” FP420

Collaboration, arXiv:0806.0302v2 [hep-ex]; J. Inst.: 2009_JINST_4_T10001 http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1748-0221/4/10/T10001.

• “Expected Performance of the ATLAS Experiment: Detector Trigger and Physics,'' ATLAS Collaboration, arXiv:0901.0512 CERN-OPEN-2008-020. ISBN: 978-92-9083-321-5.

• “A Forward Proton Detector at DZero,” A. Brandt et al., Fermilab Proposal P-900, FERMILAB-PUB-97-377.

• “The Small Angle Spectrometer of Experiment UA8 at the SPS-collider,” A. Brandt et al., (UA8 Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. in Phys. Res. A 327, 412 (1993).

• “The Upgraded Dzero Detector,” V. M. Abazov et al., (DZero Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. in Phys. Res. A 565, 463 (2006).

Five other significant publications

• “Hard Single Diffraction in Proton-Antiproton Collisions at √s= 630 and 1800 GeV,” B. Abbott et al., (DZero Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 531, 52 (2002).

• “Observation of the Top Quark,” S. Abachi et al., (Dzero Collaboration), PRL 74, 2632 (1995). • “Observation of Diffractively Produced W and Z bosons in Proton-Antiproton Collisions at √s= 1.8

TeV,” V. M. Abazov et al., (DZero Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 574, 169 (2003). • “Evidence for a Super-hard Pomeron Structure,” A. Brandt et al., (UA8 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B

297, 417 (1992). • “The Inclusive Jet Cross Section in Proton-Antiproton Collisions at √s= 1.8 TeV,” V. M. Abazov et

al., (DZero Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 525, 211 (2002).

IV. PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES

Proposal Reviewer: National Science Foundation, Department of Energy (2001– ) Organized many international workshops including Lishep98 and Lishep02, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Page 11: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

Numerous invited colloquia and seminars

V. SYNERGISTIC ACTIVITIES • Deputy Project Leader of ATLAS Forward Proton (AFP) upgrade project and leader of AFP

timing detector development • FP420 Executive board (2006-present) leading timing detector development • ATLAS Trigger Rate Coordinator (2008-present) • Spokesman of T958, Fermilab Test Beam Experiment on picosecond timing (2006-2008) • Proposed, initiated, and led DZero Forward Proton Detector group (1996-2006) • Formed and led Dzero Rapidity Gap analysis group (1992-2001) • DZero QCD and Run I physics convener (1998-2000) • Developed and tested cosmic ray muon scintillation detector for DZero (1992-1994) • DZero Run I Triggermeister (1994-5); Run II Trigger Leader (1999)

VI. COLLABORATORS

• Dzero Collaboration (http://www-d0.fnal.gov ) • ATLAS Collaboration (http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/Welcome.html ) • FP420 Collaboration (http://www.fp420.com )

VII. ADVISEES (UTA)

• Michael Strang, University of Texas at Arlington, received Ph.D. Aug. 2005. • Pedro Duarte, University of Texas at Arlington, received Masters June 2007 • Arnab Pal, University of Texas at Arlington, 2006- (Ph.D.). • Ian Howley, University of Texas at Arlington, 2008- (Ph.D.) • Ryan Hall, University of Texas at Arlington, 2010- (M.S.) • Chance Harenza, UTA, 2005 (Undergraduate) • Joaquin Noyola, UTA, 2005,2007 (Undergraduate) • Shane Spivey, UTA, Alec Malcolm, UTA, 2006 (Undergraduate) • Ryan Hall, Larry Lim, Mason MacPhail 2008-2010 (Undergraduate) • Swapnil Baral. Lee Baker UTA, 2009-2010 (Undergraduate) • Monica Hew, James Bourbeau, Keith Gray, Kevin Hajasad 2010- (Undergraduate)

VIII. OTHER ADVISEES • Brent May, University of Arizona (Ph. D.), 1994. • Tracy Thomas, Northwestern (Ph. D.), 1997. • Jill Perkins, University of Texas at Arlington (Ph.D.), 1998. • Kristal Mauritz, Iowa State University (Ph. D.), 1999. • Linda Coney, Notre Dame (Ph. D.), 2001.

IX. ADVISORS • (Postdoctoral) H. Montgomery, Fermilab • (Ph.D. Thesis) P. Schlein, UCLA

X. AWARDS and HONORS • Phi Beta Kappa, College of William and Mary, December 5, 1984. • Department of Energy Young Independent Scientist Award (presented

November 3, 1997 at DOE Forrestal Building). • Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (presented November 3, 1997 at

Old Executive Office Building of White House). • Department of Energy Outstanding Junior Investigator Award, August 2001. • UTA Research Excellence Award Mar. 2005, Mar. 2006, Mar. 2007, Mar. 2008, Mar. 2009 • UTA College of Science Outstanding Research Award Apr. 2007

Page 12: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

RONALD L CARTER, PH. D. PROFESSOR Department of Electrical Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington

Arlington, Texas 76019, 817-272-3466 (P), 817-272-2253 (F)

I. EDUCATION

Iowa State University B.S.,Physics 1962Iowa State University M.S., Physics 1964Michigan State University Ph. D., Physics 1971

II. PROFESSIONAL CAREER

9/1986 – 1987-1990 & 2001

Professor in Electrical Engineering Director of NSF IU/CRC CAEDS

The University of Texas at Arlington The University of Texas at Arlington

July, 2004, 5, 6 & 7 7/1990 – 5/1991 9/1981 – 8/1986

Visiting Scholar in Analog Design NSF IU/CRC Research Fellow Associate Professor with tenure

National Semiconductor, Fort Collins, CO Hewlett Packard, Santa Rosa, CA The University of Texas at Arlington

1/1979 – 8/1981 9/1977 – 1/1979

Visiting Associate Professor New Product and Process Engineer

The University of Texas at Arlington Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX

6/1971 – 8/1977 Assistant Professor of Physics The University of Mississippi, Oxford

III. Publications

Professor Carter has over 60 publications in peer reviewed journals from work in Solid State Physics, Microwave Electronics, Integrated Circuit Device Theory and Analog Circuit Design.

Five publications related to Microwave Circuits and Systems • K. W. Reed, J. M. Owens, and R. L. Carter, "Current Status of Magnetostatic Wave Reflective Array

Filters," invited paper Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 4, pp. 157-180, Nov. 1985. • J. M. Owens, J. H. Collins, and R. L. Carter, "System Applications of Magnetostatic Wave

Devices," Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 4, pp. 317-334, Nov. 1-2, 1985. • S. N. Bajpai, R. L. Carter, and John Owens, "Insertion Loss of Magnetostatic Surface Wave Delay

Lines", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, MTT-36, pp. 132-136, January, 1988.

• J. M. Owens, J. Y. Guo, W. A. Davis and R. L. Carter, "W-band Ferrite-Dielectric Image-Line Field Displacement Isolators", 1989 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, pp. 141-144.

• Carter, R. L. and P. Sivasubramanian, "Microwave Device Models for Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors 1: Static Model", in Microwave Transistor Physics and Modeling Seminar Notes, IEEE MTT-S Dallas Section, Dallas, TX, November, 1993, pp. 1-20.

Five other significant publications • Hossain M.M.; Daewoo Kim; Chaugule, A.; Alan Davis, W.; Russell, H.T.; Carter, R.L.; “Adjacent

Device Thermal Effects Modeling and Characterization in Dielectrically Isolated Bipolar Technology”, Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology, 2006. ICSICT '06. 8th International Conference, Oct. 2006 Page(s):1256 – 1259.

• A. S. Haque, M. M. Hossain, W. A. Davis, H. T. Russell, Jr. and R. L. Carter, “Design of Sinusoidal, Triangular, and Squarewave Generator Using Current Feedback Operational Amplifier (CFOA)”, Technical Digest 2008 IEEE Region 5 Technical, Professional, and Student Conference, pp. 109-113, April 17-20, 2008, Kansas City, Missouri.

• M. M. Hossain, W. A. Davis, H. T. Russell, Jr., and R. L. Carter, “Design of VBE Referenced Bootstrap Current Source, Sensitivity, and Self-Heating Effect”, Technical Digest 2008 IEEE Region

Page 13: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

5 Technical, Professional, and Student Conference, pp. 120-123, April 17-20, 2008, Kansas City, Missouri.

• S. C. Bhola, H. T. Russell, Jr., R. L. Carter, W. A, Davis, and A. S. Haque, “Design and Analysis of an Improved Translinear Floating Resistor for a Variable Gain Amplifier”, Technical Digest 2008 IEEE Region 5 Technical, Professional, and Student Conference, pp. 318-322, April 17-20, 2008, Kansas City, Missouri.

• Howard T. Russell, Jr., Ronald L. Carter, W. Alan Davis; “A Wide-Band All-NPN Current Mirror for Precision Biasing of Multiple Circuits”, Invited Paper, accepted for publication in the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology, October 20-23, 2008, Beijing.

IV. PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES

Technical Program Committee Co-Chair (with W. Alan Davis) for 2004 IEEE-MTT International Microwave Symposium, Fort Worth, TX.

Served as Dallas Section Chairman for IEEE Electron Devices Society 1987-88. Publicity Chairman for 1990 IEEE-MTT International Microwave Symposium, Dallas, TX. Local Arrangements Chairman for 1987 IEEE-MTT International Microwave Symposium, Las

Vegas, NV.

V. SYNERGISTIC ACTIVITIES • Leader of the Analog Integrated Circuits Laboratory, EE Department, University of Texas at

Arlington. VI. CURRENT COLLABORATORS • W. Alan Davis, UTA • Howard T. Russell, Jr., UTA • Tracey Krakowski, National Semiconductor, Santa Clara, CA VII. ADVISEES (UTA – 50 total) • Zheng Li, PhD dissertation, August 2005, UTA. • Zhipeng Zhu, PhD dissertation, August 2005 UTA. • Nithya Jagannathan, MSEE (Thesis Option with W. A. Davis and H.T. Russell), August 2006, UTA. • Md Mahbub Hossain, PhD Dissertation, May 2007, UTA. • Suman Chakrabarty Bhola, MEngr (Project Option), December, 2007. • Mingsheng Peng, PhD (co-advisor with W. Alan Davis), December 2007. • Obiorah Oji, MSEE (Thesis Option), August 2008, UTA. • Ardasheir Sayek Rahman, MSEE (Thesis Option), December 2008, UTA. • Daewoo Kim, PhD Dissertation, December 2008, UTA. • Kevin Bastin, MSEE (Thesis Option), August 2009, UTA..

VIII. ADVISORS • (Ph.D. Dissertation) Frank J. Blatt, Michigan State University

IX. AWARDS and HONORS • Eta Kappa Nu, University of Texas at Arlington, 1980. • Tau Beta Pi Distinguished Engineer, University of Texas at Arlington, 1987. • UTA College of Engineering Halliburton Excellence in Research Leadership Award, 1990.

Page 14: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH

W. Alan Davis

a. Education

University of Michigan B.S. Engineering Math 1963University of Michigan B.S.E.E. Electrical Eng. 1963University of Michigan M.S.E.E. Electrical Eng. 1964University of Michigan Ph.D. Electrical Eng. 1971Dissertation: Design and Analysis of a Parametric Lower

Sideband Upconverter

Raytheon/MIT Signals and Systems 1978Raytheon Designing with Microproc. 1980Northeastern University Wave Propagation Problems with Irregular

Boundaries 1981

b. Professional Experience

1983-present Associate Professor of Electrical EngineeringThe University of Texas at Arlington

Duties Teaching and research in analog electronicslow frequency, RF, and Microwave circuits,fields, devices

1989-1990 Contractor Sandia Laboratories

Duties Design of millimeter Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors r1977-1983 Raytheon Corporation, Hartwell Road, Bedford, Mass.Duties IMPATT Diode Power Combiners, Thermal response of IMPATT

diodes with a chirp waveform, Broadband Directional Couplers,Schiffman Phase shifters, microwave Filter Designdesign for automatic antenna test station

1973-1977 General Electric R & D Center, Schenectady, N.Y.1971-1973 McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario1966-1971 Cooley Electronics Lab., U. of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan1965-1966 (summers) Steelcase, Inc., Grand Rapids, Michigan1964 (Summer) King Seeley, Ann Arbor, Michigan

c. Relevant Publications

W. Alan Davis and Peter J. Khan, “Coaxial Bandpass Filter Design,” IEEETrans. on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. MTT-19, pp. 373-380, April1971.

W. Alan Davis, “Design Equations and Bandwidth of Loaded- Line PhaseShifters,” IEEE Trans. on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. MTT-22,pp. 561-563, May 1974.

1

Page 15: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

W. Alan Davis, Microwave Semiconductor Circuit Design, New York:Van Nos-trand, 1984.

Md. M. Hossain, W. Alan Davis, Howard T. Russell Jr., Ronald L. Carter, “Self–Heating Effect on Current Mirror Performance,” IEEE Emerging TechnologiesConference, Richardson, TX, Sept. 2006.

W. Alan Davis, Radio Frequency Circuit Design - Second Edition, New York:Wiley, Jan. 2010.

Ancillary Publications

W. Alan Davis and H. E. Stinehelfer, “Applications of the Time Domain toNetwork Synalysis,” Electro/82, May 1982.

J. M. Owens, J. Y. Guo, W. A. Davis, R. L. Carter, “ W-Band Ferrite-DielectricImage-Line Field Displacement Isolators,” IEEE MTT-S International MicrowaveSymposium, pp. 141-144, June 1989.

W. A. Davis, “ Filter Design with Impedance Transformation,” Presented 2ndInternational Symposium on Recent Advances in Microwave Technology, Sept. 4,1989.

R. Yarborough and W. A. Davis, “ Microstrip to Coaxial Line Transition” , 3rdInternational Symposium on Recent Advances in Microwave Technology, August1991.

Patents

Howard T. Russell, Jr., Ronald L. Carter, Wendell A. Davis, “An all–NPN bipolarjunction transistor precision current mirror with capability for driving multipleloads”, U.S. Patent 11/856,677, Date disclosure filed: February 12, 2007, Datepatent filed: September 17, 2007.

d. Professional Activities

Chairman, Dallas Section Microwave Theory and Techniques 1987-88, Co-chairTechnical Program Committee, 2004 Microwave International Symposium, Dallas

e. Synergistic Activities

Attended active learning seminar and using some of these ideas in classesDistance learning since the 1980s

f. Collaborations and Co-Editors

PhD dissertation adviser – Peter Khan (now residing in Israel)

2

Page 16: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

MICHAEL M. RIJSSENBEEK Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University

Stony Brook, New York 11794-3800, Phone: 631-632-8099, Fax: 631-632-8101

I. EDUCATION

University of Amsterdam B.S.,Physics and Astronomy January, 1972

University of Amsterdam Ph.D. Physics October, 1979

II. PROFESSIONAL CAREER

1994– Professor Stony Brook University, NY; DØ and ATLAS experiments

1989–1994 Associate Professor Stony Brook University, NY; DØ experiment

1985–1989 Assistant Professor Stony Brook University, NY; DØ experiment

1981–1985 CERN Staff member CERN, Switzerland; UA1 experiment

1979–1981 CERN Fellow CERN, Switzerland; UA1 experiment

III. Publications

~500 Publications with the UA1 (46), DØ (~420), PP2PP, and ATLAS Collaborations.

Five publications related to building detectors

1. “The Construction of the Central Detector for an Experiment at the CERN Anti-p p Collider,” the UA1 Collaboration (M. Barranco-Luque et al.). Nucl.Instrum.Meth.176:175,1980.

2. “The DØ Detector,” the DØ Collaboration (S. Abachi et al.). Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A338:185-253,1994.

3. “The Upgraded Dzero Detector,” V. M. Abazov et al., (DZero Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 565, 463, 2006.

4. “Construction, Assembly and Tests of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Barrel Calorimeter,” the ATLAS Electromagnetic Barrel Liquid Argon Calorimeter Group (Bernard Aubert et al.). Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A558:388-418, 2006.

5. “The High Voltage Feedthroughs for the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeters,” B.Botchev, G.Finocchiaro, J.Hoffman, R.L.McCarthy, M.Rijssenbeek, JSteffens, A.Talalaevskii, M.Thioye, M.Zdrazil, J.Farrell, S.Kane. JINST 2:T10002, 2007.

Five other significant publications

1. “Experimental Observation of Lepton Pairs of Invariant Mass Around 95-GeV/c**2 at the CERN SPS Collider,” the UA1 Collaboration (G. Arnison et al.). Phys. Lett. B126:398-410,1983

2. “Experimental Observation of Isolated Large Transverse Energy Electrons with Associated Missing Energy at s**(1/2) = 540-GeV,” the UA1 Collaboration (G. Arnison et al.). Phys. Lett. B122:103-116,1983.

3. “Observation of the Top Quark,” the DØ Collaboration (S. Abachi et al.). Phys. Rev. Lett. 74:2632-2637,1995.

4. Conference Summary XIth International Conference on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering, Stanley J. Brodsky, (SLAC) and Michael Rijssenbeek; SLAC-PUB-11553, Nov 2005. Invited talk at 11th Int. Conf. on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering: Towards High Energy Frontiers: The 20th Anniversary of the Blois Workshops, Chateau de Blois, France, 15-20 May 2005. e-Print: hep-ph/0511178.

5. “Measurement of the W boson mass,” the DØ Collaboration (V. Abazov et al.). Phys. Rev. Lett. 103:141801,2009.

Page 17: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

IV. PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES

Reviewer of PRL, PRD, IEEE submissions; reviewer of NSF and DOE grant proposals (1996–)

Member/chair of several DØ Editorial Boards (1994–)

Chair Local Organizing Committee for XIIth International Conference on Hadron Collider Physics, June 1997, Stony Brook.

Invited conference talks, colloquia, and seminars

V. SYNERGISTIC ACTIVITIES

2002–2004 Convener of the ATLAS Luminosity and Forward Physics Working Group

1997–present Stony Brook ATLAS representative

1995–1998 Co-convener of DØ W mass group

1989–1992 Co-convener of DØ Electroweak Physics group

1986 DØ Tracking test-beam czar

VI. COLLABORATORS

• Dzero Collaboration (http://www-d0.fnal.gov )

• ATLAS Collaboration (http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/Welcome.html )

• FP420 Collaboration (http://www.fp420.com )

VII. ADVISEES (Stony Brook: DØ and ATLAS)

1. James Cochran PhD 1993; Professor, Iowa State University 2. Joseph Thomson PhD 1994; CEO Circadiant Systems Inc. 3. Dennis Shpakov PhD 2000; Northeastern University 4. Abid Patwa PhD 2001; Scientist, Brookhaven National Laboratory 5. Chunmei Chang PhD 2001 6. Andrei Talalaevskii Engineer, HYPRES Inc. 7. Zhongmin Wang PhD 2004, University of Pennsylvania, Medical Center 8. Marian Zdrazil PhD 2004, Royal Bank of Canada 9. Moustapha Thioye PhD 2008, Postdoc, Yale University 10. Feng Guo PhD 2010, Financial Industry (Chicago) 11. Julia Ann Gray PhD 2011 (estimated) 12. John Stupak PhD 2013 (estimated)

VIII. ADVISORS

• (Postdoctoral) C. Rubbia, CERN, B. Sadoulet, CERN.

• (Ph.D. Thesis) D. Harting, UvA; L. H. Muirhead, U Liverpool (deceased).

IX. AWARDS and HONORS

• Faculty Teaching Award, Physics Dept., Stony Brook, 1997.

• APS Fellow, 2010

Page 18: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

ROBERT DEAN SCHAMBERGER JR.

(A) CURRICULUM VITAE

DATE OF BIRTH: June 28, 1948

ADDRESS: Department of Physics State University of New York Stony Brook NY 11794

e-Mail: dean at sbhep.physics.sunysb.edu

EDUCATION: SUNY at Stony Brook, Major: Physics, B.S.(1970) SUNY at Stony Brook, Major: Physics, Ph.D. (1976) SUNY at Stony Brook, Area: High Energy Physics, (1976-1981)

(B) APPOINTMENTS

EMPLOYMENT: Technical Director of the High Energy Physics Laboratories (1993 – )Principal Research Scientist, SUNY Stony Brook (1988 – 1993) Senior Staff Scientist, SUNY Stony Brook (1985 – 1988) Senior Research Associate, SUNY Stony Brook (1981 – 1985 ) Research Associate, SUNY Stony Brook (1976 – 1981)

OTHER: Co-Principal Investigator, National Science Foundation (1980 – )

(C1) PUBLICATIONS RELATED TO THIS PROPOSAL

1 “Beam Tests of the DØ Uranium Liquid Argon End Calorimeters”, S. Abachi etal.,Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A324, 53, 1992.

2 “The Upgraded DØ Detector”, V.M. Abazov etal., Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res. A 565, 463 (2006).

3 “Measurement of the W Boson Mass”, Submitted 8/5/09: Phys. Rev. Lett.

4 “Observation of Single Top-Quark Production”, V.M. Abazov etal., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 092001 (2009).

5 “Search for Dark Photons from Supersymmetric Hidden Valleys” V.M. Abazov etal., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 081802 (2009).

Page 19: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

(C2) OTHER PUBLICATIONS

1 “E1 Transitions from the State and the Fine Structure of the b States ”, M. Narain, D. M. J. Lovelock, U. Heintz, J. Lee-Franzini, R. D. Schamberger, J. Willins, C. Yanagisawa., P. Franzini, P. M. Tuts, S. Kanekal, and Q. W. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3113 (1991).

2 “ Measurement of the B Cross Section at ( )s 10.61 to 10.70 GeV”, Q.W. Wu, P. Franzini, S. Kanekal, P.M. Tuts, U. Heintz, J. Lee- Franzini, M. Narain, R.D. Schamberger, J. Willins, and C. Yanagisawa, Physics Letters B273, 177 (1992).

3 “Top Quark Search with the DØ 1992 – 93 Data Sample”, S. Abachi etal., Phys. Rev. D52, 4877 (1995).

4 “CUSB-II: A High Precision Electromagnetic Spectrometer”, R. D. Schamberger, U. Heintz, J. Lee-Franzini, D. M. J. Lovelock, M. Narain, J. Willins, C. Yanagisawa, P. M. Tuts, P. Franzini, S. Kanekal and Q. W. Wu, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A309 450, (1991).

5 “Search for Resonant Diphoton Production with the DØ Detector”, V.M. Abazov etal., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 231801 (2009).

(D) SYNERGISTIC ACTIVITIES Organize the Operating Calorimeters session of the CALOR 2008 conference, 26 - 30 May 2008, Pavia Italy.

(E1) OTHER COLLABORATORS

D0 collaboration (http://www-d0.fnal.gov/author/authorlist.html) Atlas collaboration (http://graybook.cern.ch/programmes/experiments/lhc/ATLAS.html)

(E2) ADVISOR

(Ph.D. Thesis and Postdoc Advisor): Juliet Lee-Franzini (Laboratori Nationali di Frascati dell’INFN, Frascati, Italy)

(E3) ADVISEES

(Postdoc advisor for): Adam Yurkewicz, SUNY at Stony Brook

Total: 1

Page 20: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

JEFFREY GRONBERG, PH. D. International Linear Collider R&D Program Leader

N-division / Physics and Applied Technologies L-050, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Livermore, CA 94550, (925) 424-3602

I. EDUCATION

University of Colorado University of California, Los Angeles University of California, Los angeles

B.S.,Physics M.S., Physics Ph.D., Physics

May, 1986 Sept, 1987 Oct, 1991

II. PROFESSIONAL CAREER

4/1999 - Research Scientist Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 10/1991 – 3/1999 Postdoctoral Fellow University of California, Santa Barbara

III. Publications

Dr. Gronberg has over 300 publications in peer-reviewed journals from his research on the UA1, CLEO, and CMS Collaborations.

• “The FP420 R&D Project: Higgs and New Physics with Forward Protons at the LHC,” FP420 Collaboration, arXiv:0806.0302v2 [hep-ex]; J. Inst.: 2009_JINST_4_T10001 http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1748-0221/4/10/T10001.

• “Eddy Current Studies From the Undulator-based Positron Source Target Wheel Prototype. ” Ian Bailey, et al. IPAC-2010-THPEC033, May 2010.

• “Design of a Pulsed Flux Concentrator for the ILC Positron Source. ” J. Gronberg et al. IPAC-2010-THPEC037, May 2010.

• “Design of the Beam Delivery System for the International Linear Collider”. A. Seryi et al., In the Proceedings of Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC 07), Albuquerque, New Mexico, 25-29 Jun 2007, pp 1985. Also in *Albuquerque 2007, Particle accelerator* 1985-1987

• “Resolution of a High Performance Cavity Beam Position Monitor System”. S. Walston et al., Jul 6, 2007. 3pp. In the Proceedings of Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC 07), Albuquerque, New Mexico, 25-29 Jun 2007, pp 4090.

• “Performance of a High Resolution Cavity Beam Position Monitor System”. S. Walston et al., Nucl.Instrum.Meth.A578:1-22,2007.

• “Development of a positron production target for the ILC positron source”., I.R. Bailey et al., Published in *Edinburgh 2006, EPAC* 2484-2486

• “Photon collider technology summary. J. Gronberg, Acta Phys.Polon.B37”:1321-1325,2006. • “Design issues for the ILC positron source. ” V. Bharadwaj et al.,

In the Proceedings of Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC 05), Knoxville, Tennessee, 16-20 May 2005, pp 3230.

• “Photon Collider Technology Overview. ” J. Gronberg, In the Proceedings of 2005 International Linear Collider Workshop (LCWS 2005), Stanford, California, 18-22 Mar 2005.

• “Reaching confidence in photon collider technology. ” J. Gronberg, Prepared for 5th International Workshop on Electron-Electron Interactions at TeV Energies, Santa Cruz, California, 12-14 Dec 2003. Published in Int.J.Mod.Phys.A20:7333-7337,2005.

• “A Photon Collider Experiment based on the SLC, ” J. Gronberg, Nucl Phys B126 4 (2004). Proceedings of the Photon 2004 conference

Page 21: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

• “Lasers and Optics for a Gamma-Gamma Collider, ” D. Asner etal. PAC-2001-FPAH055. Presented at the IEEE particle Accelerator Conference (PAC2001) Chicago, Illinois, 2001

• “Gamma-Gamma Interaction Region Design Issues, ” J. Gronberg, Published in Batavia 2000, Physics and experiments with future linear e+e- colliders.

• “NLC Interaction Region Layout and Background Estimates, ” J. Gronberg et al. Published in Batavia 2000, Physics and experiments with future linear e+e- colliders.

• “Higgs Physics with a Gamma-Gamma collider based on CLIC I. ”, D. Asner et al. Euro. Phys. C28 27-44 (2003).

• “Photon Photon and Electron Photon Colliders with Energies below a TeV. ”, M. Velasco et al. Contributed to the APS Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics, Snowmass, CO, July 2001

• “The NLC Photon Collider Option, Progress and Plans, ” J. Gronberg Nucl. Instrum. Meth A 472:61-66

• “Detecting and studying Higgs bosons at a photon-photon collider. ” Asner et al. Phys. Rev. D67 (2003)

IV. PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES

Organized many international workshops on polarized positron sources and photon collider physics and technology Numerous invited talks.

V. SYNERGISTIC ACTIVITIES

VI. COLLABORATORS

• CMS Collaboration (http://cms.web.cern.ch/cms ) • FP420 Collaboration (http://www.fp420.com ) • ILC Positron Source Collaboration

VII. ADVISEES

VIII. OTHER ADVISEES

IX. ADVISORS

• (Postdoctoral) H. Nelson, UCSB • (Ph.D. Thesis) D. Cline and C. Buchanan, UCLA

X. AWARDS and HONORS • Cum Laude, University of Colorado, May, 1986.

Page 22: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

Current and Pending Support (See GPG Section II.D.8 for guidance on information to include on this form.)

The following information should be provided for each investigator and other senior personnel. Failure to provide this information may delay consideration of this proposal. Other agencies (including DOE) to which this proposal has been/will

be submitted. NONE Investigator: Andrew Brandt Sup-port:

Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal Title Research in Experimental Elementary Particle Physics (Co-PI) Source of Support: DOE Total Award Amount: $548k

Total Award Period Covered: Feb. 1, 2010– Jan. 31, 2011 Location of Project: UTA, Fermilab, CERN Person-Months Per Year Committed Cal: Acad: Sumr:2 Sup-port:

Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal Title ATLAS Project Funds (Co-PI) Source of Support: DOE Total Award Amount: $708,000

Total Award Period Covered: Oct. 1, 2009– Dec. 31, 2010 Location of Project: UTA, BNL,CERN Person-Months Per Year Committed Cal: Acad: Sumr: Sup-port:

Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal Title SW Tier 2 Center (Co-PI) Source of Support: NSF Total Award Amount: $600,000

Total Award Period Covered: Oct. 1, 2009– Dec. 31, 2010 Location of Project: UTA Person-Months Per Year Committed Cal: Acad: Sumr:

Sup-port:

Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal Title: Reaching Goals in Physics with GAANN Fellowships (Co-Pi) Source of Support: Dept. of Education Total Award Amount: $392,000

Total Award Period Covered: Sep.1, 2009 – Aug. 31, 2012 Location of Project: UTA Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Cal: Acad: Sumr:

Page 23: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

Sup-port:

Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal Title: Investigation of Energy Transfer Based Nanocomposites For Radiation Detec-tion (Co-PI) Source of Support: Dept. of Homeland Security Total Award Amount: $1.31M

Total Award Period Covered: Sep. 1, 2010 – Aug 31, 2015 Location of Project: UTA Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Cal: Acad: Sumr:

Sup-port:

Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal Title: Development of a Long Life Microchannel Plate Photomultiplier Tube for High Flux Applications through the Innovative Application of Nanofilms (Co-Pi) Source of Support: NSF SBIR Phase I Total Award Amount: $149,531

$ $

Total Award Period Covered: January 1, 2011 – June 30, 2011 Location of Project: UTA/Massachusetts Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Cal: Acad: Sumr:

Page 24: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

Current and Pending Support (See GPG Section II.D.8 for guidance on information to include on this form.)

The following information should be provided for each investigator and other senior personnel. Fail-ure to provide this information may delay consideration of this proposal. Other agencies (including DOE) to which this proposal has been/will

be submitted. NONE Investigator: Ronald L. Carter

Sup-port:

Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal Title Research in High Speed Analog Integrated Circuits

Source of Support: National Semiconductor, Santa Clara, CATotal Award Amount: $475,000 Total Award Period Covered: June, 2004– May, 2010 Location of Project: UTA Person-Months Per Year Committed Cal: Acad: 1/yr Sumr: 2/yr

Sup-port:

Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal Title Continuation of Research in High Speed Analog Integrated Circuits Source of Support: National Semiconductor, Santa Clara, CATotal Award Amount: $50,000 Total Award Period Covered: June, 2010– May, 2011 Location of Project: UTA Person-Months Per Year Committed Cal: Acad: 1/yr Sumr:2

Sup-port:

Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal Title Continuation of Research in High Speed Analog Integrated Circuits Source of Support: National Semiconductor, Santa Clara, CATotal Award Amount: $100,000 Total Award Period Covered: June, 2011– May, 2012 Location of Project: Person-Months Per Year Committed Cal: Acad: 1/yr Sumr:2

Sup-port:

Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal Title:

Source of Support: Total Award Amount: Total Award Period Covered: Location of Project: Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Cal: Acad: Sumr:

Page 25: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

Current and Pending Support – Michael Rijssenbeek Project Title: U.S. ATLAS Operations: Empowering U.S. Universities for

Discoveries of the Energy Frontier (PI, 2 Co-PIs) Current Source of Support: NSF via Nevis, Columbia University Award Amount: $ 246,897 Award Period: 03/01/07 – 01/31/11 Location of Project: Stony Brook NY, Fermilab IL, and CERN, Geneva, Switzerland  

Project Title: Nucleon decay and Neutrino Experiments and Experiments at High Energy Hadron Colliders (Co-PI, 1/2 -- on Hadron Collider part)

Pending Source of Support: DOE Award Amount: $ 616,783 (Hadron Collider part only) Award Period: 11/15/10 – 03/31/11 Location of Project: Stony Brook NY, Fermilab IL, and CERN, Geneva, Switzerland  

Project Title: Experiments Studies of the Standard Model and Beyond at High Energy Colliders (Co-PI, 1/7)

Pending Source of Support: NSF Award Amount: $ 5,253,443 Award Period: 04/01/11 – 03/31/14 Location of Project: Stony Brook NY, Fermilab IL, and CERN, Geneva, Switzerland    

Page 26: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

Current and Pending Support – R. Dean Schamberger Project Title: Experimental Studies of Fundamental Symmetries (Co-PI, 1/5) Current Source of Support: NSF Award Amount: $ 2,640,000 Award Period: 04/01/07 - 09/30/10 Location of Project: Stony Brook NY, Fermilab IL, and CERN, Geneva, Switzerland  

Project Title: Experiments Studies of the Standard Model and Beyond at High Energy Colliders (Co-PI, 1/7)

Pending Source of Support: NSF Award Amount: $ 5,253,443 Award Period: 04/01/11 – 03/31/14 Location of Project: Stony Brook NY, Fermilab IL, and CERN, Geneva, Switzerland  

Page 27: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

References

[1] P-909: http://www.cdf.fnal.gov/upgrades/btb.proposal.ps.

[2] M. Akatsu, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 440 (2000) 124; M. Akatsu, et al., Nucl. Instr. andMeth. A 528 (2004) 763; Y. Enari, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 547 (2005) 490.

[3] “The FP420 R&D Project: Higgs and New Physics with Forward Protons atthe LHC,” FP420 Collaboration, arXiv:0806.0302v2 [hep-ex], published in J. Inst.:http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1748-0221/4/10/T10001.

[4] 2006 Texas ARP proposal 003656-0001-2006, Andrew Brandt (UTA), “A Proton Detector toDiscover New Physics at the Energy Frontier.”

[5] 2007 DOE Advanced Detector Research proposal, Andrew Brandt (UTA), “Development of a10 Picosecond Time of Flight Counter.”

[6] L. Glashow, Nucl. Phys. 22, 579 (1961); S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967); A.Salam, Proceedings of the 8th Nobel Symposium, Stockholm, 367 (1968).

[7] T. Aaltonen et al., CDF Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 052004; Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(2009) 242001.

[8] E. Chapon, O. Kepka, C. Royon, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 073005; Phys. Rev. D81 (2010)074003; T J. De Favereau et al., arXiv:0908.2020; Nicolas Schul, Trento 2010, http://diff2010-lhc.physi.uni-heidelberg.de/Talks/, and arXiv:0910.0202

[9] See for example: “Experience with the first generation deep sampling ASICs IRS and BLAB3”,Gary Varner, Workshop on Timing Detectors: Electronics, Medical and Part. Phys. Appl., Nov29 – Dec 01, 2010, Cracow.

[10] www.Minicircuits.com.

[11] RD316 Flexible Double Shielded 0.114” 50 FEP SPCW Stranded 0.0201 PTFE M17/152-00001RD316 12.4 GHz 19.00 27.00 43.00. Price (Pasternack.com): RG316U-DS $1.82/ft (50-99ft)

Page 28: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

Facilities and Equipment The University of Texas at Arlington has been very supportive of the High Energy Physics (HEP) group, and has designated the group’s activities as a ``Center of Excellence.’’ The constructed Chemistry and Physics building constructed in 2006 includes about 10,000 ft2 dedicated to HEP research, including several labs and a high-bay area with a 5 ton crane for detector construction, specialized electronics development labs, the ATLAS super-computing Tier 2 center, and the Picosecond Test Facility (described below). The 2006 ARP and 2007 DOE ADR grants have provided equipment for fast timing including the Lecroy Wavemaster 8620A 6 GHz oscilloscope, the Hamamatsu PLP-10 laser controller with 405 and 638 nm laser diodes, allowing us to establish the Picosecond Test Facility (PTF) for advanced Microchannel Plate Phototube and fast electronics testing In addition to the laser and scope, the PTF includes specialized commercial fast timing electronics, such as a Phillips and CAEN TDC’s, ORTEC and Mini-circuits preamplifiers with bandwidths ranging from a couple hundred MHz to 8 GHz, ORTEC constant fraction discriminators, as well as a wide array of SMA cables and connectors. We also have an Alberta designed 8 channel constant fraction discriminator. Further additional resources include access to the facilities and infrastructure at Fermilab and CERN test beams. The UTA Electrical Engineering design laboratory has available both a Agilent 8510C automatic network analyzer that operates from 45 MHz to 26 GHz and an Agilent 4395A network/spectrum/impedance analyzer that operates from 10 Hz to 500 MHz. Ancillary measurement equipment includes a HP 4284 LCR meter capable of measuring reactance from 20 Hz to 1 MHz, an Agilent 54855A 6 GHz oscilloscope, and an Agilent MSO 6184 oscilloscope useful for frequencies from 16 Hz to 4 GHz. This equipment is housed in a screen room that can be used for taking low level measurements. Design and simulation of circuit boards is aided by several presently used computer programs such as SPICE which is a fundamentally time domain analysis, Advanced Design System (ADS) which is a fundamentally frequency domain microwave analysis and optimization, ICCAP which is used for measurement control and optimization, and Cadence which can link to the other programs mentioned but is especially useful in design layouts.

Page 29: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT & OTHER RESOURCES

FACILITIES: Identify the facilities to be used at each performance site listed and, as appropriate, indicate their capacities, pertinent

capabilities, relative proximity, and extent of availability to the project. Use "Other" to describe the facilities at any other performance

sites listed and at sites for field studies. USE additional pages as necessary.

Laboratory:

Clinical:

Animal:

Computer:

Office:

Other:

MAJOR EQUIPMENT: List the most important items available for this project and, as appropriate identifying the location and pertinent

capabilities of each.

OTHER RESOURCES: Provide any information describing the other resources available for the project. Identify support services

such as consultant, secretarial, machine shop, and electronics shop, and the extent to which they will be available for the project.

Include an explanation of any consortium/contractual arrangements with other organizations.

The HEP Group uses approximately 9500 square feet of general-purposelaboratory space within the Physics building. This space includes anelectronics lab, a medium-level clean room facility, a high-level cleanroom with Silicon Probe Station, a machine shop, and a general-purpose

N/A

N/A

The PIs and the grad student will use computers supplied by the HighEnergy Group

The PIs and the grad student will use offices that are provided for themby the Physics Department.

N/A

All of the major equipment (ATLAS detector) for this experiment willlocated at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. At Stony Brook, New York we have alogic analyzer and 2 fast digital storage scopes for electronic testingand design. We have an Alessi Rel 6100 semiautomatic probe station forsilicon sensor testing.

At Stony Brook we have a professional machine shop and a professionalelectronics shop in the Department of Physics and Astronomy.

Page 30: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT & OTHER RESOURCES

Continuation Page:

NSF FORM 1363 (10/99)

LABORATORY FACILITIES (continued):

construction lab. The instrumentation we own are two modern 1 GSa/s 1 GHzBW sampling scopes, recently acquired with ARRA funds. We own a precisionsoldering station and ultrasound cleaning equipment for mountingsurface-mount components onto PCBs. We have a long tradition of productionof fast electronics for the DZero experiment (Tracking electronics,Calorimeter front-end electronics and SVX Trigger electronics).

Page 31: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

Professor James Pinfold

Department of Physics/Faculty of Science

Centre for Particle Physics · University of Alberta · Edmonton · Canada · T6G 2G7

Telephone: (780) 492-3637 · Fax: (780) 492-3408 E-mail: [email protected]

April 20th 2010 Dear Dr Rijssenbeek, Here are the quotes for the electronics you requested. The prices are in US dollars and are good for three months . Cost of 1st prototype for 3-chip HPTDC board (two 8-channel boards): Parts $1,200 excluding HPTDC chips, for 2 boards; Parts $480 6 HPTDC chip, we currently have 3 more chips left. PCB $700 Cost on the PCBs manufacture (when 2 are ordered) Labor $1,800 90 hrs schematics and PCB design @$20/hr Labor $600 30 hrs assembling work @ $20/hr Labor $1,200 60 hrs for testing/programming @$20/hr Sub total $5,980 Cost of 2nd prototype for 3-chip HPTDC board (two 8-channel boards): Parts $1,200 excluding HPTDC chips, for 2 boards; this number not equal Parts $480 6 HPTDC chips PCB $700 Cost on the PCBs manufacture (when 2 are ordered) Labor $900 45 hrs schematics and PCB design @$20/hr Labor $600 30 hrs assembling work @ $20/hr Labor $800 40 hrs for testing/programming @$20/hr Sub total $4,680 Cost of 8-channel Production HPTDC board: (per board, when making 18) Parts $600 excluding HPTDC chips Parts $240 3 HPTDC chips PCB $100 Cost on the PCB (when 18 are ordered) Labor $35 30 hrs schematics and PCB design @$20/hr --divided by 18 Labor $600 30 hrs assembling work @ $20/hr Labor $120 6 hrs for testing @$20/hr Sub total $1,695 Cost of 18 boards = $30,150

Best regards,

James Pinfold.

Page 32: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

Login | Create Account

US & Canada 800-552-8258 or 847-468-8258 Monday - Friday 7AM - 5PM (CST)

Request a Quote(0) | Shopping Cart (0)

Search

Technical Info & Tools Test Equipment Promotions About Us

You Are Here: Home - Arbitrary Waveform Generators / > Tektronix > Tektronix AWG5012

New Equipment

Used Equipment

Equipment Categories

General Categories Place cursor on arrow

GeneratorsAnalyzersMetersOscilloscopesProbes

Quick Links

Tektronix AWG5012 - Tek AWG5012 2 Channel, Arbitrary Waveform Generator

Tektronix AWG5012 Tek AWG5012

Details More Info Datasheets

Manufacturer : Tektronix

Model #: AWG5012

Description: The Tektonix AWG5012 is one of our Factory Refurbished 2 Channel, Arbitrary Waveform Generators. More Discounted Refurbished Tek Equipment Full Factory Warranty - Call your Sales Engineer for more details.

List Price: $58,700.00

Sale Price: $27,883.00

Desired Quantity: 1 Add to Quote Request

This item is also available for purchase online!

Desired Quantity: 1 Add to Shopping Cart

2 Channel•1.2 GS/s•14 Bit•16M Point•

Tektronix

Tektronix Info Bin BK Precision

BK Info Bin Fluke

Fluke Info Bin Com-Power InstekAnaheim ScientificCal Test Electronics Core TechnologyChroma

Agilent HP FlukeTektronixActernaKeithley Rohde & Schwarz Wandel & Goltermann Marconi Instruments

More Manufacturers

Digital OscilloscopesSignal Generators Power Supplies Spectrum Analyzers Digital Multimeters Network Analyzers Communication Analyzers Telecom Test Equipment Electronic Loads Power Quality Anlayzers Impedance Analyzers EMI/RFI/EMC Products

More Categories

Comparison ChartEquipment for RentMake OfferPromotionsSale ItemsScope Selector

Page 1 of 2Tektronix AWG5012 - Tek AWG5012 2 Channel, Arbitrary Waveform Generator -Valuetronics

Page 33: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics

Manufacturers | Industry Partners | Products | Sale Items | Promotions Manufacturers and Sale Items Catalog | Comparison Charts | Product Updates | Request a Quote

View Quote Cart | Contact Us | Employment | About Us | FAQs | Sitemap

Create Account | My Account Login | Manuals for Members | MyAccount Benefits

Toll Free (US & Canada) 800-552-8258 Phone: 847-468-8258 Fax: 847-717-6121 Email: [email protected]

ValueTronics International, Inc. 1675 Cambridge Drive, Elgin, IL 60123 USA

Hours of Operation: Monday-Friday 7:00AM to 5:00PM Contents 2002-2010 ValueTronics - All Rights Reserved

www.ValueTronics.com

Page 2 of 2Tektronix AWG5012 - Tek AWG5012 2 Channel, Arbitrary Waveform Generator -Valuetronics

Page 34: Project Narrative: Advanced Detector Research Electronics