Preventing Colorectal Cancer2763,292...Use the media. Support colorectal cancer screening—if you or a family member are a cancer survivor, share your story. Know the toll of colorectal

The Council of State Governments' (CSG) Healthy States Initiative is designed to help state leaders make informed decisions on public health issues. The enterprise brings together state legislators, officials from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, state health department officials, and public health experts to share information, analyze trends, identify innovative responses, and provide expert advice on public health issues. CSG's partners in the initiative are the National Black Caucus of State Legislators and the National Hispanic Caucus of State Legislators.

Funding for this publication is provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, under Cooperative Agreement U38/CCU424348. Points of view in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. government.

Published June 2007

Preventing Colorectal Cancer Tool Kit

Legislator Policy Brief

Talking Points

Reducing Colorectal Cancer: Screening, Access and Services in Minority and Underserved Communities

Sample State Legislation

Resources Guide for State Policymakers

ß

ß

ß

ß

ß

CSG’s Healthy States Initiative

Trends analysis, innovative responses and expert advice on critical public health issues for states.

www.healthystates.csg.org859.244.8000

PreventingColorectal Cancer


TheHealthyStatesInitiativehelpsstateleadersaccesstheinformationtheyneedtomakeinformeddecisions

onpublichealthissues.Theinitiativebringstogetherstatelegislators,CentersforDiseaseControlandPreven-

tion (CDC)officials, statehealthdepartmentofficialsandpublichealthexperts to share informationand to

identifyinnovativesolutions.

TheCouncilofStateGovernments’partnersintheinitiativearetheNationalBlackCaucusofStateLegislators

(NBCSL)andtheNationalHispanicCaucusofStateLegislators(NHCSL).Theseorganizationsenhanceinfor-

mation–sharingwithstatelegislatorsandpolicymakersoncriticalpublichealthissues.

FundingforthispublicationisprovidedbytheU.S.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices,Centers

forDiseaseControlandPrevention,underCooperativeAgreementU38/CCU424348.Pointsofviewinthis

documentarethoseoftheauthoranddonotnecessarilyrepresenttheofficialpositionorpoliciesoftheU.S.

government.

Why public health? Statelegislatorsplayavitalroleindeterminingthestructureandresourcesavailabletostateandlocalagen-

ciesdedicatedtoprotectingthepublic’shealth.Publichealthagencieseducatethepublicandofferinterventions

acrossawidespectrumofpublichealthissuesincluding:

Ensuringthatchildrenandat–riskadultsareimmunizedagainstdeadlydiseases;

Assistingvictimsofchronicconditionssuchascancer,heartdiseaseandasthma;

Preventingdiseaseanddisabilityresultingfrominteractionsbetweenpeopleandtheenvironment;

ResearchinghowHIV/AIDSinfectionsandothersexuallytransmitteddiseasescanbeprevented;

Promotingthehealthandwell–beingofpeoplewithdisabilities;and

Workingwithschoolstopreventriskybehavioramongchildren,adolescentsandyoungadults.

Information resources for state policymakers Newinformationresourcesproducedunderthisinitiativeinclude:

HealthyStatesWebsite.ThisuniqueWebsiteoffersinformationandresourcesonmanypublichealthissues.Visithttp://www.healthystates.csg.org togetinformation,signupforpublicationsandviewotherinformationontheinitiative.

HealthPolicyHighlightsandHealthyStatese–weekly.Eachweek,thisfreeweeklyelectronicnewsletterbringsthelatestpublichealthnews,resources,reportsandupcomingeventsstraighttoyourinbox.

HealthyStatesQuarterly.CSGpublishesa freequarterlynewslettercoveringpublichealth legislativeandpolicytrends,innovativebestpracticesfromtheexecutiveandlegislativebranches,currentresearch

andinformationonHealthyStatesactivities.

ForumsandWebConferences.Webconferencesareofferedtoallowpublichealthexperts,legislatorsand

legislativestafftointeractonprioritypublichealthissues.Forumsincludeeducationalsessionsonpublichealthissues,newlegislatortrainingandroundtablediscussionswithpeersandpublichealthexperts.

HealthyStatesPublications.Newresourceswillassiststatelegislatorsinterestedinpublichealthtopics,includingobesityandchronicdiseaseprevention,HIV/AIDSandsexuallytransmitteddiseasepreven-tion,vaccines,healthdisparitiesandschoolhealth.

For more information IfyouareinterestedinthelearningopportunitiesavailablethroughtheHealthyStatesInitiative,visithttp://

www.healthystates.csg.org, http://www.nbcsl.org or http://www.nhcsl.org.

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

The

Hea

lthy

Stat

es In

itiat

ive

A pa

rtne

rshi

p to

pro

mot

e pu

blic

hea

lth

Preventing Colorectal Cancer Overview

Colorectalcanceristhesecond–leadingcauseofcancer–relateddeathsintheUnitedStates,behindonlylung/bronchuscancer.Morethan56,000Americanswilldieofcolorectalcancerthisyearandapproximately145,000peoplewillbediagnosedwiththedisease.Yet,atleasthalfofthesedeathscouldhavebeenpreventedthroughregularscreeningsandearlydetection.1ThisLegislator Policy Briefprovidesstatepolicymakerswithkeybackgroundinformationaboutcolorectalcancerandidentifiesprovenandcost–effectivepreventionstrategiesforstates.

What Do Legislators Need to Know About Colorectal Cancer?

Colorectal cancer is common and can be deadly. Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer for men and

women,and90percentofcasesoccurinpeopleoverage50.In2002,themostrecentyearforwhichdataareavailable,

139,534Americanswerediagnosedwithcolorectalcancerand56,603diedfromit.2

The costs of colorectal cancer are staggering.TheannualcostofcancerintheUnitedStatesin2006wasestimatedto

be$206.3billion,ofwhichdirectmedicalcostsaccountedfor$78.2billionandlostproductivityaccountedfor$128.1

billion.Costsassociatedwithtreatmentforcolorectalcancerareestimatedat$8.4billionfor2006.3

Screening improves chances of cure and reduces treatment costs.Becausecolorectalcancerusuallystartsasaslow–

growingpolyp,anabnormalgrowth,screeningmakespreventionpossible.Screeninghelpsfindprecancerouspolyps

sotheycanberemovedbeforetheyturnintocancer.Screeningalsomakesearlydetectionpossible;findingcancers

earlygreatlyimprovesthechanceofbeingcuredandreducestreatmentcosts.4

Screening rates are increasing, but are still low.Screeninghasbeenlowcomparedwiththeuseofothercancerscreen-

ing tests,1butscreeningratesareslowlystarting to increase. In2004,only57percentofAmericansage50orolder

reportedbeingscreenedattherecommendedintervals.1Screeningratesareparticularlylowamongpeoplewhohave

noinsurance,nousualsourceofhealthcare,andthosewhosedoctorsdonotrecommendscreening.5Therearealso

disparitiesinscreeningratesbyraceandethnicity.6

What Can State Legislators Do to Help Prevent Colorectal Cancer?

Launch public awareness campaigns.Dedicatefundingtomediacampaignsthatraisepublicawarenessaboutcolorec-

talcancerandtheimportanceofscreenings.

Promote screenings.Createprogramstoimproveaccesstoscreeningservicesbymakingsurethatuninsuredorunder-

insuredpeoplecanaffordscreenings.

Target health disparities.Createculturallyandethnicallyappropriateoutreachandscreeningefforts.

Extend insurance coverage.Considerrequiringhealthcareinsurerstocovercostsforscreenings.

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

Legislator Policy Brief Preventing Colorectal Cancer 1

Actions for State Legislators

Demonstrate Leadership

Use the media.Supportcolorectalcancerscreening—ifyouorafamilymemberareacancersurvivor,shareyourstory.

Know the toll of colorectal cancer in your state.Contactyourstatehealthdepartmenttolearnthefactsabouthow

colorectalcancerisimpactingpeopleinyourcommunity,districtandstate.

Launch Public Awareness Campaigns

Use materials created by the CDC.CDC’sScreenforLife:NationalColorectalCancerActionCampaignhasculturally

competenteducationalcampaignmaterials,includingfactsheets,brochuresandpublicserviceannouncements,avail-

able inEnglishandSpanishathttp://www.cdc.gov/colorectalcancer/what_cdc_is_doing/sfl.htm.Offer theminyouroffice,

mentiontheminnewslettersorlinktothemfromyourlegislativeWebsite.

Secure dedicated funding for awareness programs.Illinois,forexample,providestaxpayerswiththeopportunityto

donatefundstocolorectalcancerresearchandawarenessprogramsthroughacheck–offontheirtaxforms.

Observe National Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month. MarchisNationalColorectalCancerAwarenessMonth.Rec-

ognizeitwitharesolution,astatewideawarenesscampaignorboth.Moreinformationisavailableathttp://www.pre-

ventcancer.org/colorectal.

Promote Screenings

Establish screening programs for the uninsured and underinsured.Forexample,Nebraska’sColonCancerScreening

Program,oneoffiverecentlyfundedCDCcolorectalcancerscreeningdemonstrationprojects,providesscreeningto

uninsuredandunderinsuredresidentsaged50orolder.Formoreinformationaboutthedemonstrationprojectssee:

http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/press/colorectal_cancer.htm.

Encourage health care providers to use client reminders.TheTaskForceonCommunityPreventiveServices found

sufficientevidencetorecommendasascreeningpromotionstrategytheuseofletters,postcardsortelephonecallsto

remindclientstheyaredueforascreening.7

Educate the public about the benefits of screening.Colorectalcanceristhesecond–leadingcauseofcancerdeath,yet

screeningratescontinuetobelow.

Improve access to screening services.Location,hoursofoperationandavailabilityofchildcarecanbesignificantbar-

rierstoscreening.8

Make sure your constituents know that Medicare covers colorectal cancer screening, including colonoscopy. More

informationisavailableathttp://www.medicare.gov/health/coloncancer.asp.

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

2 Preventing Colorectal Cancer Legislator Policy Brief

Target Health Disparities

Use culturally sensitive messages.Tomakesurepublicawarenesscampaignsareeffectiveinreachingtargetedaudi-

ences,useculturallyappropriatelanguageandmessages.

Support programs to educate health care professionals.Makingsurethathealthcareprofessionalsknowaboutcultural

differencesandareincompliancewithanti–discriminationlawswillhelpprovideappropriatecaretoeveryone.

Encourage recruiting and hiring of minority staff in public health departments and programs.

Develop a statewide resource center for cross–cultural health practices.

Support policies that seek to reduce barriers to patient care in the state’s health care and health insurance programs

and Medicaid.

Be aware that screening rates differ among racial and ethnic groups.UseCDC'sBehavioralRiskFactorSurveillance

System(BRFSS)datatoassistindeterminingwhereoutreacheffortsareneeded.VisitCDC’sBRFSSWebsiteathttp://www.

cdc.gov/brfss.

Extend Insurance Coverage

Consider mandating insurance coverage for colorectal cancer screening.Eighteenstatescurrentlyhavelawsrequiring

insurerstocovercolorectalscreeningtestsinaccordancewithAmericanCancerSocietyguidelines.Bycomparison,47

stateshavelawsrequiringinsurancecoverageforbreastcancerscreening.9

Work with insurers to voluntarily expand benefits.Ifcoverageisnotorcannotbemandatedinyourstate,workwith

insurerstodevelopbenefitsthatincludecolorectalcancerscreenings.

Other Things You Can Do

Support colorectal cancer research.Onceapatientenrollsinaclinicaltrial,insurancecoverageisoftendeniedforrou-

tinemedicalcare,suchasdoctorvisits,hospitalstaysandlaboratorytests.Studiesshowthatdenyinginsurancecover-

ageisasignificantbarriertosecuringadequateparticipationinclinicaltrials.Currently,19statesmandateinsurance

coverageforclinicaltrialparticipants’routinemedicalcare.

Learn more about current research.FindoutthelatestinCDCcolorectalcancerresearcheffortsbyvisitinghttp://www.

cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal.

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n


State Policy Examples

A Multifaceted Approach to Prevention in Colorado TheColoradoColorectalScreeningProgram,which is fundedby tobacco tax revenueand ledby theUniversityofColoradoCancerCenter,providesscreeningservicestomedicallyunderservedColoradoansaspartofacomprehensiveapproachtocolorectalcancercontrol.

Otherscreeningpromotioneffortsincludeafour–yearawarenessprojecttargetedatindividualsages50to74,mediaandeducationaleventsinrecognitionofColorectalCancerAwarenessMonth(March),andaCDC–fundedstudytoin-creasescreeningratesinruralnortheasternColorado.

Inadditiontoeducationcampaignstargetingthegeneralpublic,Coloradohasprogramsaimedateducatinghealthcareprofessionals,suchasScreentheScreener,whichisdesignedtoencouragehealthprofessionalstopromotecolorectalcancerscreeningandsendthemessagethatcolorectalcancerscreeningisapriority.Coloradoalsopassedlegislationin2005requiringinsurerstodisclosecolorectalcancerscreeningbenefits.

http://www.coloradocancercoalition.org/task/task_colorectal.aspx

Covering Screening and Treatment Costs in Delaware Delaware,likemanyEastCoaststates,hascancermortalityrateshigherthanthenationalaverageanduntilrecentlyhadeitherthefirstorsecondhighestmortalityrateinthenationeachyear.Thoughratesarestillhigh,Delaware’sCancerConsortiumismakingsignificantprogressinincreasingscreeningrates,especiallyamongtheuninsured.Theconsor-tiumwascreatedbya2001legislativemandateandfundedbytobaccosettlementdollarsandstatediscretionaryfunds.

Partofacomprehensivecancercontroleffort,Delaware’sScreeningforLifeprogrampaysforcolorectalcancerscreen-ingandupto12monthsoftreatmentforthosewhoareuninsuredorunderinsuredandlackthemeanstopayforthetestsandtreatmentontheirown.

Additionally,becausehealthdisparitiesareasmuchaprobleminDelawareastherestofthenation,theChampionsofChangeprogramtargetspreventionmessagestotheAfrican–Americancommunitythroughtheuseofculturallyspecificcampaignmaterialsandlocallybasedeffortstopromotescreening.

http://www.dhss.delaware.gov/dhss/dph/dpc/partners_prevention.html


Increasing Prevention and Early Detection in New York Since1997,NewYorkhasensuredaccesstoroutinecolorectalcancerscreeningstounderservedanduninsuredpopu-lationsages50andolderthroughauniqueprogramusinglocalinitiativesthroughoutthestate.Theprogram,whichisfundedthroughstateappropriations,increasesthepreventionandearlydetectionofcolorectalcancer,helpingtoreducemortality.In2006,NewYorkpassedlegislationtoprovidetreatmentservicestothosediagnosedwithcolorectalcancerinthestateprogram.

Theprogramalsoraisespublicawarenessaboutcolorectalcancerprevention.Currently,30community–basedpart-nershipsinvolving43countiesprovidecolorectalcancerscreeningaswellaseducationaboutprostatehealth,prostatecancerandissuesrelatedtoscreeningandtreatment.Theseprogramscoordinatewith localCancerServicesProgramPartnerships tobecomethefoundationofan integratedapproachtoprovidingcancereducation,screeningandearlydetectionservicesforprioritypopulations.

http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/cancer/center/cancer_services.htm

Increasing Screening Rates and Encouraging Better Nutrition in North Carolina NorthCarolinahassomeofthehighesttotalscreeningratesinthecountry,buttheratesdifferbyraceandincome,withAfrican–Americansasagrouptrailingwhites,andlow–incomepeopletrailingmiddle–incomepeople.Only32percentofcolorectalcancersinthestate,however,arediagnosedintheearlystage,whentreatmentcostsarelowestandchancesoffive–yearsurvivalare90percent.

ManypreventionstrategieshavebeenusedinNorthCarolina.Forexample,a2001statelawrequiresinsurancecover-ageforcolorectalcancerscreeningsinaccordancewithAmericanCancerSocietyguidelines.Thestate’shealthdepart-mentalsohasadoptedaComprehensiveCancerControlProgramthatpromotesawarenessofcancerscreening,earlydetectionandprevention.

Inanothereffort,theNationalCancerInstitutefundedademonstrationprogramusingcommunitychurchestoencour-ageruralAfrican–Americanstoincreasetheirconsumptionoffruitsandvegetables.Studieshaveshownthateatingahigh–fiber,low–fatdietlowerstheriskofmanychronicdiseases.EvaluationofthedemonstrationprogramshowedthatitwassuccessfulinboostingfruitandvegetableconsumptionamongruralAfrican–Americans.

http://www.communityhealth.dhhs.state.nc.us/cancer.htm


Sen.DonneTrotter isa formerdirectorofminorityhealth for theCookCountyDepartmentofPublicHealthwithmorethan20yearsofservicetotheCookCountyhealthcaresystem.TrotterwasfirstelectedtotheIllinoisGeneralAssemblyin1988.

His Advice to State Legislators:

Make screening a priority.Trotteremphasizedthathealthisessentialtoqualityoflifeandthatgettingpreventivescreen-

ingsisvitaltogoodhealth.InordertoensurethatIllinoisanshadaccesstoscreenings,hesaid,“in2003,wemandatedthat

insuranceplansinIllinoismustcovercolonoscopytests,thesameaswedidwithcervicalcancerandbreastcancer.”

Support awareness programs.“Likemoststates,…there’sonlyafiniteamountofmoneythat’savailable.So,wecreated

anincometaxcheck–offthatwouldgosolelytoanawarenessprogram,”Trotterexplained,describingIllinoiseffortsto

fundacolorectalcancerawarenessprogram.Enhancingaccesstoscreeningwithcoveragemandatesisn’tenough—educa-

tionisneededtoencouragepeopletoseekscreening.

Build for the future.“Ahealthysocietymeansyouaregoingtohaveahealthyeconomy.Openupyourofficesandopen

upyourmind—findoutwhatisgoingonaroundyou.”Trottersuggestedthatlegislatorsmakecontactswiththestate

healthdepartment,medicalsocietyandotherprogramsinordertoidentifystatecolorectaldiseaseanddeathrates,as

wellashealthdisparities.

Source: Healthy States October 2005 Web Conference, “Reducing Colorectal Cancer: Screening, Access and Services in Minority and Underserved Communities.” Archive available at http://www.healthystates.csg.org/Events+and+Conferences/Web+Conferences/Colorectal+Cancer+Web+Conference.htm.

Want to Know More?

We’ll help you find experts to talk to about this topic

If you would like to explore this topic in greater depth, contact us at the Healthy States Initiative and we’ll help you connect with…

an expert on this issue from the CDC.

fellow state legislators who have worked on this issue.

other public health champions or officials who are respected authorities on this issue.

Send your inquiry to http://www.healthystates.csg.org/ (keyword: inquiry) or call the health policy group at (859) 244–8000 and let us help you find the advice and resources you need.

n

n

n

n

n

n

Advice from a State LegislatorBuilding an Effective Outreach Program


Donne E. TrotterIllinois Senate

Dr.PaulSilverman,associatedeputyforhealthinformationandscienceinthestateof Delaware’s Division of Public Health, helps to staff the Delaware Cancer Con-sortium (DCC). The DCC, a 15–member council with seven standing committees,advisesthegovernorandthelegislatureaboutpotentialmethodsforreducingcancercasesanddeaths in thestate.Fourstate legislators—twofromtheHouseandtwofromtheSenate—serveonthecouncil.

TheDCCbeganmeetinginApril2001withtheunderstandingthatitsworkwouldbefocusedondevelopingaclearandusablecancercontrolplan.Manyinitialeffortsoftheplanfocusedonscreeningforandearlydetectionofcolorectalcan-cer.Effortsincludedscreeningforuninsuredpatientsandaddingstatefundedcolorectalcancerscreeningtothefederallyfundedbreastandcervicalcancertreatmentprogram.

AccordingtoSilverman,keyelementsinDelaware’scancercontrolprograminclude:

Supportfromhigh–ranking,credibleandpassionateleaders.InDelaware,Gov.RuthAnnMinnerwascommittedto

creatingapowerfulandeffectivecancer–fightingplan.BecauseMinnerhadlostherhusbandtocancer,herpersonal

storyanddrivewereinstrumental;

Supportandstoriesfromordinarystateresidents;

Afocusedplanwithfeasiblegoals;and

Legislativesupportandbroad–basedparticipation.

His Advice to State Legislators:

Support screening legislation.Silvermanrecommendedthatlegislatorsconsidersupportinglegislationtorequireinsur-

erstocovercolorectalcancerscreeningservicesthatarebasedonnationallyacceptedguidelines.

Support social marketing.Fundingsocialmarketingstrategiesabouttheimportanceofage–appropriatecolorectalcan-

cerscreeningiskeytoincreasingawarenessandscreeningrates.

Work with business leaders.“Workwithstatechambersofcommerceandlocalbusinessestosupporthealthpromo-

tionstrategiesthatincludecolorectalcancerscreening—thatis,timeoffforcolonoscopypreparationandprocedure,”

Silvermansaid.

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

Advice from a Public Health OfficialCreating a Statewide Cancer Fighting Consortium


Dr. Paul SilvermanDelaware Division of Public Health

Key Facts and TermsWhat Is Colorectal Cancer?

Cancerofthecolonorrectum,whichtogethermakeupthelargeintestine,hasfew,ifany,symptomsinitsearlystages.

Itusuallybeginsasslow–growingpolypsorabnormalgrowths.Removingpolypscanpreventcolorectalcancer.

Who Gets Colorectal Cancer?

Colorectalcanceristhesecondleadingcauseofcancer–relateddeathsintheUnitedStates,behindonlylung/bron-

chuscancer.1

Morethan56,000Americanswilldieofcolorectalcancerthisyear,andapproximately145,000willbediagnosedwiththedisease.1

In2002,themostrecentyearforwhichdataareavailable,139,534Americanswerediagnosedwithcolorectalcancer,

and56,603diedfromit.3

Colorectalcanceristhethirdmostcommoncancerformenandwomen.2

Theriskofcolorectalcancerincreaseswithageand90percentofcasesoccurinmenandwomenage50andover.2

Approximately75percentofcolorectalcancersoccurinpeoplewithnoknownriskfactorsexceptage.4

What Are the Costs of Colorectal Cancer?

Whendetectedearly,treatmentcostforcolorectalcancerisabout$30,000perpatient.Treatmentcostforapatientwith

latestagecolorectalcancerisestimatedat$120,000.10

Colorectalcanceriscostly—theNationalCancerInstituteestimatesthatnationaltreatmentexpendituresin2004reached

$8.4billion.3

What Are the Screening Tests? TheUnitedStatesPreventiveServicesTaskForceandtheAmericanCancerSocietyrecommendfourscreeningstrate-gies,whichcanbeusedaloneorincombinationwitheachother:

Fecal occult blood test (FOBT), which checks for hidden (“occult”) blood in three consecutive stool samples—per-

formedyearly.

Flexiblesigmoidoscopy,inwhichphysiciansuseaflexible,lightedtube(sigmoidoscope)tovisuallyinspecttheinterior

wallsoftherectumandpartofthecolon—performedeveryfiveyears.

Colonoscopy,inwhichphysiciansuseaflexible,lightedtube(colonoscope),whichislongerthanthesigmoidoscope,to

visuallyinspecttheinteriorwallsoftherectumandtheentirecolon—performedevery10years.

Doublebariumcontrastenema,consistsofaseriesofX–raysofthecolonandrectum,whicharetakenafterthepatientis

givenanenemacontainingbariumdyefollowedbyaninjectionofairinthelowerbowel—performedeveryfiveyears.

Threenew,lessinvasivetestsareonthehorizon:

FecalDNAtest,whichscreensforgeneticmutationsassociatedwithcolorectalcancerinthestool;

Fecalimmunochemicaltest(FIT),isperformedliketheFOBTbutproducesfewerfalsepositiveresults;and

CTcolonography,alsocalledvirtualcolonoscopy,usesX–raysandcomputerimagingtoproducetwo–andthree–di-

mensionalimagesofthelargeintestine.

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n


What Scientific Research SaysCan Colorectal Cancer Be Prevented?

Screeningroutinely,beginningatage50,helpspreventcolorectalcancer.Screeningcanfindprecancerouspolypsinthe

colonandrectum,sotheycanberemovedbeforetheyturnintocancer.

Whenfoundearly(i.e.,StageI)throughscreening,colorectalcancerhasan85percentto95percentcurerate.11

Assumingthat100percentofthepopulationisscreened,theestimatedeffectivenessofscreeningtestsinpreventing

colorectalcancermortalityare:

FecalOccultBloodTest—38percenteffective

Flexiblesigmoidoscopy—50percenteffective

Colonoscopy—70percenteffective12

Are People Getting Recommended Screenings?

In2004,about57percentofadultsoverage50reportedreceivingeitheranFOBTwithinthepreviousyearoranendos-

copywithintheprevious10years.12

Screeningratesvarywithincomelevels—asincomedecreases,screeningratesalsodecrease.12

ScreeningratesarelowerforAfrican–Americansthanwhites10andforruralresidentsthannon–ruralresidents.13His-

panicAmericansarelesslikelytogetscreenedforthediseasethanwhitesorAfrican–Americans.6

Inmenandwomen,African–Americanshavehigherincidenceandmortalityratesthanwhites,regardlessofthestage

atdiagnosis.EvenwhenAfrican–Americansarediagnosedearly,theyarestillmorelikelytodiethanotherracesor

ethnicities.6

Screeningratesareparticularlylowamongpeoplewhohavenoinsurance,nousualsourceofhealthcareandthose

whosedoctorshavenotrecommendedscreening.5

Is Screening Cost–Effective?

Colorectalcancerscreeningiscost–effective.Researchshowsthatithasacost–effectivenessratioof$10,000to$25,000

perlife–yearsaved.10Thismeans,forexample,thatifastatespent$12.5milliononscreeningandtreatmentoverfive

years,between100and250deathswouldbeprevented.Thisratioissimilartoorbetterthanthatofotherimportant

healthscreenings,includingmammography.14

Anestimated65percentofscreeningservicecostscanberecoveredthroughsavingsfromavoidedinpatient,outpatient,

laboratory,clinicalandpharmacyservices.15

n

n

n

®

®

®

n

n

n

n

n

n

n


References

1SeeffLC,KingJ,PollackLA,WilliamsKN.“Increaseduseofcolorectalcancertests—UnitedStates,2002and2004.”MMWR.2006;55(11);308–311.

2U.S.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices.“UnitedStatesCancerStatistics:1999–2002IncidenceandMortalityWeb–BasedReport.”Atlanta,GA:CentersforDiseaseControlandPreventionandNationalCancerInstitute;2005.Availableathttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/uscs/.AccessedMarch28,2007.

3NationalCancerInstitute.“Costsofcancercare.CancerTrendsProgressReport.”Dec.2005.Availableat http://progressreport.cancer.gov/doc_detail.asp?pid=

1&did=2005&chid=25&coid=226&mid=.AccessedJune27,2006.

4PignoneM,RichM,TeutschSM,BergAO,LohrKN.“Screeningforcolorectalcancerinadultsataveragerisk:asummaryoftheevidencefortheU.S.PreventiveServicesTaskForce.”Annals of Internal Medicine2002;137:132–141.

5SeeffLC,NadelMR,KlabundeC,ThompsonT,ShapiroJA,VernonSW,CoatesRJ.“PatternsandPredictorsofColorectalCancerTestUseintheAdultUSPopulation.”Cancer2004;100:2093–103.

6CancerResearchandPreventionFoundation.“Minoritiesandcolorectalcancer.”Feb.2006.Availableathttp://www.preventcancer.org/colorectal/facts/minori-

ties.cfm.AccessedJune27,2006.

7TaskForceonCommunityPreventiveServices.“Promotingcolorectalscreeningincommunities:TaskForcerecommendationsontheuseofclientre-minders.”TheGuidetoCommunityPreventiveServices.February2005.Availableathttp://www.thecommunityguide.org/cancer/screening/ca–screen–int–cc–cli-

ent–remind.pdf.March29,2007.

8TaskForceonCommunityPreventiveServices.“Promotingcolorectalscreeningincommunities:TaskForcerecommendationsonreducingstructuralbarriers.”TheGuidetoCommunityPreventiveServices.February2005.Availableathttp://www.thecommunityguide.org/cancer/screening/ca–screen–int–cc–re-

duce–barriers.pdf.AccessedMarch29,2007.

9NationalConferenceofStateLegislatures.“Colorectalcancerscreening:Whatarestatesdoing?”April2006.Availableathttp://www.ncsl.org/programs/

health/colonrectal.htm.AccessedJune16,2006.

10PignoneM,SahaS,HoergerT,MandelblattJ.“Cost–effectivenessanalysesofcolorectalcancerscreening:AsystematicreviewfortheU.S.PreventiveServicesTaskForce.”Annals of Internal Medicine2002;137:96–104.

11RedaelliA,CranorCW,OkanoGJ,ReesePR.“Screening,preventionandsocioeconomiccostsassociatedwiththetreatmentofcolorectalcancer.”Phar-

macoeconomics.2003;21(17):1213–1238.

12MaciosekMV,SolbergLI,CoffieldAB,EdwardsNM,KhanchandaniHS,ButaniAL,McGreeDA,GoodmanMJ.“Colorectalcancerscreening:TechnicalreportpreparedfortheNationalCommissiononPreventionPriorities.”May11,2006.Availableathttp://www.prevent.org/images/stories/clinicalprevention/

colorectal.pdf.AccessedMarch29,2007.

13CoughlinSS,ThompsonTD.“ColorectalcancerscreeningpracticesamongmenandwomeninruralandnonruralareasoftheUnitedStates,1999.”The

Journal of Rural Health.2004;20:118–124.

14TengsTO,AdamsME,PliskinJS,SafranDG,SiegelJE,WeinsteinMC,GrahamJD.“Five–hundredlife–savinginterventionsandtheircost–effective-ness.”Risk Analysis.1995;15(3):369–390.

15PartnershipforPrevention.“PrioritiesforAmerica’sHealth:CapitalizingonLife–Saving,Cost–effectivePreventiveServices.”2006.Availableathttp://

www.prevent.org/nccp.AccessedMarch28,2007.


ResourcesCDC’s Colorectal Cancer Web pagehttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal

CDC’s Guide to Community Preventive Serviceshttp://www.thecommunityguide.org/policymakers.html

CDC’s National Comprehensive Cancer Control Programhttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/ncccp

CDC’s National Program of Cancer Registrieshttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr

CDC’s Screen for Life Web pagehttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/sfl/

CDC’s State Cancer Burden Data Fact Sheetshttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/cancerburden

CDC’s States Taking Action Against Cancer Program Highlights Web pagehttp://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/cancercontacts/ncccp/pia/

Healthy States Initiative’s Cancer Web pagehttp://www.healthystates.csg.org/Public+Health+Issues/Cancer/

Healthy States Initiative’s Issue Brief and Archived Web Conference:Reducing Colorectal Cancer: Screening, Access and Services in Minority and Underserved Communitieshttp://www.healthystates.csg.org/Public+Health+Issues/Cancer/

Healthy States Initiative’s Comprehensive Approaches to Cancer Control Tool Kithttp://www.healthystates.csg.org/Public+Health+Issues/Cancer/

American Cancer Societyhttp://www.cancer.org/docroot/lrn/lrn_0.asp

American Cancer Society’s Colon and Rectal Cancer pageshttp://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/CRI_2x.asp?sitearea=&dt=10

Cancer Control Planethttp://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov

National Cancer Institutehttp://www.cancer.gov/cancerinfo/types/colon–and–rectal

National Colorectal Cancer Roundtablehttp://www.nccrt.org

National Colorectal Cancer Research Alliance’s Legislative Report Cardhttp://www.eifoundation.org/national/nccra/report_card/reportcard_2006.pdf

National Cancer Institute’s State Cancer Legislative Databasehttp://www.scld–nci.net

National Cancer Institute’s State Cancer Burden Profileshttp://statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov

Partnership for Preventionhttp://www.prevent.org

U.S. Preventive Services Task Forcehttp://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/prevenix.htm


Preventing Diseases:Policies that work based on the research evidence

1) Promote healthy eating. Policiesthatgivekidshealthierfoodchoicesatschoolcanhelpcurbrisingratesofyouthobesity.EnsuringthateveryneighborhoodhasaccesstohealthyfoodswillimprovethenutritionofmanyAmericans.

2) Get people moving. Policiesthatencouragemorephysicalactivityamongkidsandadultshavebeenproventoreduceratesofobesityandtohelppreventotherchronicdiseases.

3) Discourage smoking. Policies that support comprehensive tobacco controlprograms—thosewhich combine school–based, community–basedandmediainterventions—areextremelyeffectiveatcurbingsmokingandreducingtheincidenceofcancerandheartdisease.

4) Encourage prevention coverage. Policiesthatencouragehealthinsurerstocoverthecostsofrecommendedpreventivescreenings,testsandvaccinationsareproventoincreasetheratesofpeopletakingpreventiveaction.

5) Promote health screenings. Policiesthatpromote—throughworksitewellnessprogramsandmediacampaigns—theimportanceofhealthscreen-ingsinprimarycaresettingsareproventohelpreduceratesofchronicdisease.

6) Protect kids’ smiles. Policiesthatpromotetheuseofdentalsealantsforkidsinschoolsandcommunitywaterfluoridationareproventodramaticallyreduceoraldiseases.

7) Require childhood immunizations. Requiringimmunizationsforschoolandchildcaresettingsreducesillnessandpreventsfurthertransmissionofthosediseasesamongchildren.Scientific,economicandsocialconcernsshouldbeaddressedwhenpoliciestomandateim-munizationsareconsidered.

8) Encourage immunizations for adults. Policiesthatsupportandencourageimmunizationsofadults,includingcollegestudentsandhealthcareworkers,re-duceillness,hospitalizationsanddeaths.

9) Make chlamydia screenings routine. Screeningandtreatingchlamydia,themostcommonsexuallytransmittedbacterialinfection,willhelpprotectsexu-allyactiveyoungwomenagainst infertilityandothercomplicationsofpelvic inflammatorydisease(PID)thatarecausedbychlamydia.

10) Promote routine HIV testing. MakingHIVtestingpartofroutinemedicalcareforthoseaged13to64canfosterearlierdetectionofHIVinfectionamongthequarterofamillionAmericanswhodonotknowtheyareinfected.

Learnmoreabouttheseandotherprovenpreventionstrategiesathttp://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm,http://www.thecommu-nityguide.org/policymakers.htmlandhttp://www.prevent.org/images/stories/health_policy.pdf.


The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is part of the United States Department ofHealthandHumanServices,whichisthemainfederalagencyforprotectingthehealthandsafetyofallAmericans.Sinceitwasfoundedin1946tohelpcontrolmalaria,CDChasremainedattheforefrontofpublichealtheffortstopreventandcontrolinfectiousandchronicdiseases,injuries,workplacehazards,disabilitiesandenvironmentalhealththreats.

Helpingstategovernmentsenhancetheirownpublichealthefforts isakeypartofCDC’smission.Everyyear,CDCprovidesmillionsingrantstostateandlocalhealthdepartments.Somefundsareintheformofcategoricalgrantsdirectedatspecificstatutorily–determinedhealthconcernsoractivities.Otherfundsaredistributedasgeneralpurposeblockgrants,whichtheCDChasmoreflexibilityindecidinghowtodirectanddistribute.

TheCDCdoesnotregulatepublichealthinthestates.Rather,itprovidesstateswithscientificadviceinfieldsrangingfromdiseasepreventiontoemergencymanagement.Italsomonitorsstateandlocalhealthexperiencesinsolvingpublichealthproblems,studieswhatworks,providesscientificassistancewithinvestigationsandreportsthebestpracticesbacktopublicagenciesandhealthcarepractitioners.

Forstatelegislatorswhoareinterestedinimprovingtheirstate’spublichealth,theCDCoffersawealthofresources,including:

Recommendationsforprovenpreventionstrategies;

Examplesofeffectivestateprograms;

AccesstotoppublichealthexpertsattheCDC;

Meetingsspecificallyaimedatstatelegislativeaudiences;

Factsheetsonpoliciesthatpreventdiseases;and

State–specificstatisticsontheincidenceandcostsofdisease.

ThispublicationfromtheHealthyStatesInitiativeisalsoanexampleofCDC’seffortstohelpstates.TheHealthyStatesInitiativeisfundedbyacooperativeagreementwiththeCDC.

TheCDChasdevelopedpartnershipswithnumerouspublicandprivateentities—amongthemmedicalprofessionals,schools,nonprofitorganizations,businessgroupsandinternationalhealthorganizations—butitscooperativeworkwithstateandlocalhealthdepartmentsandthelegislativeandexecutivebranchesofstategovernmentremainscentraltoitsmission.

n

n

n

n

n

n

What the CD

C Does for States

The Council of State Governments' (CSG) Healthy States Initiativeisdesignedtohelpstateleadersmakeinformeddecisionsonpublichealthissues.Theenterprisebringstogetherstatelegislators,officialsfrom the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, state healthdepartmentofficials,andpublichealthexpertstoshareinformation,analyzetrends,identifyinnovativeresponses,andprovideexpertad-viceonpublichealth issues.CSG'spartners in the initiativeare theNationalBlackCaucusofStateLegislatorsandtheNationalHispanicCaucusofStateLegislators.

Fundingfor thispublication isprovidedbytheU.S.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices,CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention,underCooperativeAgreementU38/CCU424348.PointsofviewinthisdocumentarethoseoftheauthoranddonotnecessarilyrepresenttheofficialpositionorpoliciesoftheU.S.government.

Published May 2007

Why Invest in Preventing Colorectal Cancer?The cancer will kill many Americans this year. More than 56,000 Americans will die from colorectal cancer this year and about 145,000 Americans will be diagnosed with the disease.

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer–related deaths. Of all cancers, only lung cancer kills more Americans.

Colorectal cancer kills people in all racial and ethnic groups, but some are hit harder. African–American men, for example, are about 15 percent more likely to get this cancer than their white counterparts.

Treatment costs are staggering. In 2004, the annual cost of treating colon cancer was estimated at $8.4 billion.

The cancer is highly preventable. At least 50 percent of colorectal cancer deaths could be prevented with regular screenings and early detection. If found early and treated, the five–year relative survival rate for those with colorectal cancer is 90 percent.

Screening and Early Detection Save Lives and Money Screening saves lives. The estimated effectiveness of three major colorectal cancer screening tests in preventing cancer death is:

Fecal occult blood test (FOBT)—38 percent effective

Flexible sigmoidoscopy—50 percent effective

Colonoscopy—70 percent effective

Early detection = lower treatment costs. When detected early, treatment costs for colon cancer are about $30,000 for a patient. Treatment costs for a patient with late stage colorectal cancer are estimated at $120,000 and death is far more likely.

Screening Rates Are Low Many Americans do not get screened. In 2004, 43 percent of adults age 50 and over were not getting their screen-ings completed at the recommended intervals.

Low income = low screening rates. Screening rates are closely related to income level—as income decreases, screening rates decrease.

No insurance = low screening rates. Screening rates are particularly low among those without insurance, without a usual source of health care and those whose doctors do not recommend screening.

Minority groups and rural Americans have lower screening rates. Screening rates are lower for African–Ameri-cans than whites and for rural residents than nonrural residents. Hispanics are less likely to get screened for the disease than whites or African–Americans.

n

n

n

n

n

n

®

®

®

n

n

n

n

n

R

R

R

Talking Points:Preventing Colorectal Cancer

Prevention Is Cost–EffectiveScreening is cost–effective. Research shows that screening has a cost effectiveness ratio of $10,000 to $25,000 per life–year saved. This means, for example, that if a state spent $12.5 million on screening and treatment over five years, between 100 and 250 deaths per year for five years (or 500–1,250 total deaths) would be prevented. This ratio is similar to or better than that of other important health screenings, including mammography.

Screening costs can be recovered. An estimated 65 percent of screening service costs can be recovered through savings from avoided inpatient, outpatient, laboratory, clinical and pharmacy services due to early detection and treatment.

What State Legislators Can DoDemonstrate leadership. Use the media to encourage constituents to get recommended screenings. If you or a family member are a cancer survivor, share your story. Make CDC’s "Screen for Life" materials available in your office and link to them from your legislative Web site (available at http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/sfl/).

Launch public awareness campaigns. Support funding for colorectal screening awareness programs. Pass a reso-lution to observe National Colorectal Awareness Month in March.

Promote screenings. Encourage health care providers to use client reminders. Educate the public about the ben-efits of screening. Improve access to screening services. Establish screening programs for the uninsured and underinsured.

Extend insurance coverage. Consider requiring health insurers to provide coverage for recommended colorectal cancer screening.

Target underserved populations. Make sure awareness campaigns and screening programs are sensitive to cul-tural differences and that messages are tailored to reach specific groups. Support programs that offer follow–up assistance to encourage patients to get regular screenings and that build patient trust in health care providers.

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

R

R

For more detail, see the Legislator Policy Brief, “Preventing Colorectal Cancer,” by visiting: http://www.healthystates.csg.org/Publications/.

If you would like more information, references, or to explore this topic in greater depth, please:

send your inquiry to http://www.healthystates.csg.org/ (keyword: inquiry) or

call the CSG Health Policy Group at (859) 244–8000.

This Healthy States publication is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, under Cooperative Agreement U38/CCU424348. Points of view in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. government.

n

n

healthy states br iefCSG’s par tnership to promote publ ic health

Colorectal cancer, which occurs pri-marily in adults over 50, can be avoid-ed if precancerous polyps are found through screening and removed before they become tumors. So you might think colorectal cancer wouldn’t kill that many Americans.

But it does. Fewer than 40 percent of cases are found early, when treatment can be most effective. Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States each year. In 2002, the most recent year for which statistics are available, 70,651 men and 68,883 women were diagnosed with colorectal cancer and, combined, more than 56,000 men and women died from the cancer. 1

Studies show African-American men and women are about 15 percent more likely to get this cancer than their white counterparts, and mortality rates in Af-rican-Americans are about 40 percent higher than in whites.2

But research shows that screening for colorectal cancer works and is cost-ef-fective for at-risk populations. Through colorectal cancer screening, polyps (ab-normal growths) can be detected, so they can be removed before they have a chance to turn into cancer—thereby preventing the disease. Screening also helps find colorectal cancer at an early stage, when treatment works best and

recovery rates are highest. Fed-eral and state public health offi-cials are implementing strategies to encourage more Americans to get screened for colorectal cancer. Many of these strategies target outreach efforts to minor-ity and medically underserved communities.

Screening Works, but Rates Are Low

If everyone 50 or older was screened for colorectal cancer regularly, as many as 60 percent of deaths from this cancer could be avoided. Public health ex-perts say funding for education initiatives to promote screening can lower costs by finding and treating more cancers in early or precancerous stages. Each year colorectal cancer treatment costs more than $6.5 billion, second only to breast cancer at $7 billion.3 The cost-effective-ness of screening for colorectal cancer is about the same as for other cancers. One study found screening has a cost-ef-fectiveness ratio of $10,000 to $25,000 per life-year saved.4

Still, according to the Centers for Dis-ease Control and Prevention (CDC), screening for colorectal cancer lags be-hind other cancers. Even though colorec-


Vol. 1, No. 9 August 2006

The Council of State Governments (CSG) is the premier multibranch organization forecasting policy trends for the community of states, commonwealths and territories on a national and regional basis.

tal cancer screening is effective and avail-able through many insurance programs and Medicare, the proportion of Ameri-cans getting screened remains low. As of 2004, only 57 percent of the U.S. popu-lation had been screened for colorectal cancer as recommended.5

Why Lower Screening Rates for Minorities?

Colorectal cancer is an equal oppor-tunity killer ; yet screening rates for some groups, such as African-Americans, are lower. Why? According to public health experts, screening rates may be lower for minorities because more members of those communities may:

Be less aware of the benefits or wary of the discomfort associated with screening;

n

healthy states brief: colorectal cancer prevention

This issue brief is based on an Oct. 26, 2005, Healthy States Web conference titled, “Reducing Colorectal Cancer: Screening, Access, and Services in Minority and Underserved Communi-ties.” Access an archive of this Web conference and others in the Healthy States series at www.healthystates.csg.org, keyword: web conference.

Be less able to afford screening, or not have health insurance that cov-ers screening;Live in areas with inadequate ser-vices for screening, or lack transpor-tation to services; andReceive no or inconsistent recom-mendations from health care pro-viders for screening.

The States and Screening Policy Even though colorectal cancer is highly

preventable through screening and ear-ly detection, several states are struggling to pass strong measures to encourage preventive screening. No existing fed-eral legislation requires insurance pro-viders to cover the cost of preventive screening—a key policy many public health experts think is needed to boost screening rates.

n

n

n

2 August 2006 Healthy States Brief: Colorectal Cancer Prevention

There’s a debate in the states about whether mandating insurance coverage for colorectal screening is the best ap-proach.

Those favoring required coverage ar-gue such policies are cost-beneficial be-cause they catch the cancer at its earliest stages, or even better, screening leads to preventing this cancer altogether. Pro-ponents point out the cost of screening for colorectal cancer is well within the range of acceptable costs for preventive services. Opponents argue that requiring companies to cover screening increases overall costs and results in fewer people being able to afford health insurance. According to a 2006 National Colorec-tal Cancer Research Alliance survey, 20 states have supported or required cov-erage for colorectal cancer screening. 6

Finding Ways to Reach Underserved Communities

Despite the debate about requiring in-surance coverage for colorectal screen-ings, some states are pioneering ways to encourage more people, particularly in minority communities, to get screened.

For example, the Illinois Senate spear-headed efforts to fund public awareness campaigns and colorectal cancer research. Under legislation passed in 2005 (Senate Bill 133), state taxpayers can now volun-tarily donate portions of their tax refund to help finance these efforts, which in-clude a program that targets populations with high colorectal cancer death rates. The legislation was introduced by state

Sen. Deanna Demuzio, whose husband died from the disease, and co-sponsored by state Sen. Donne E. Trotter.

In Delaware, where African-Ameri-cans are much more likely to die from colorectal cancer than whites, the Dela-ware Division of Public Health created the Champions of Change program. The program is a comprehensive grassroots effort targeted to African-American Delawareans, the state’s largest minor-ity group.7 Champions of Change targets prevention messages, materials and local efforts to promote screening specifically for the African-American community. Further support is received from Dela-ware state funding that provides a colo-noscopy and one year of cancer treat-ment for anyone without ability to pay or insurance coverage.

What State Legislators Can DoFor state legislators enthusiastic about

initiating efforts in their states, legislative champions of public health, such as Trot-ter, have this advice:

Sponsor legislation to promote colorectal cancer awareness. It is es-sential to promote colorectal cancer education and prevention, says Trotter. State legislators can sponsor or support legislation to dedicate funds to public awareness campaigns, specifically for at-risk populations.

Consider requiring screening cover-age. Including colorectal cancer screen-ing as part of comprehensive cancer screening health insurance benefits might help increase screening rates, and as a result, decrease the number of colorectal cancer cases and deaths.

Partner with state health depart-ments. Work with your state health de-partment, which has access to state-spe-cific data on colorectal cancer cases and deaths. From this partnership, state legis-lators can engage in better informed pol-icymaking about how to fight colorectal cancer. State health departments in 49 states also are partners in CDC’s Screen for Life: National Colorectal Cancer Ac-tion Campaign, which offers a variety of multimedia resources to help build awareness of the benefits of screening.

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer among African-Ameri-cans, who are diagnosed with colorectal cancer at a higher rate than any other U.S. population. Death rates from the cancer are higher among African-Americans even when cancers are found early.African-Americans are less likely than whites to have screening tests for colorectal cancer, and are thus less likely to have polyps detected and re-moved before they become cancerous. They are more likely to be diag-nosed in advanced stages when fewer treatment options are available.Diet, tobacco use and a lack of access to equal medical treatment options may increase African-Americans’ risk of developing colon cancer.

Source: The Cancer Research and Prevention Foundation, Colorectal Cancer: Minorities and Colorectal Cancer, February 10, 2006, www.preventcancer.org/colorectal/facts/minorities.cfm.

n

n

n

n

African-Americans and Colorectal Cancer

In addition to providing colonoscopy screenings for anybody over age 50 who does not have the means or the insurance to cover the cost, Delaware has taken the step to provide one year of cancer treat-ment care through state funding.

—Dr. Stephen Grubbs, Delaware Cancer Consortium

“

”

Healthy States Brief: Colorectal Cancer Prevention August 2006 3

Key Facts about Colorectal Cancer Screening

Nationally, less than 50 percent of adults are being screened appropriately for colorectal cancer. Additionally, screening rates are lower for people with less education, lower socioeconomic status, no health insurance and no physi-cian recommendations.If colorectal cancer is diagnosed early, 91 percent of patients survive. If it is diagnosed late, only 9 percent of patients survive.The risk for developing colorectal cancer increases with age. Colorectal cancer primarily affects men and women of all races over 50.Four types of colorectal cancer screening tests are recommended for men and women beginning at age 50, which can be used alone or in combination:Fecal occult blood test (FOBT), checking for hidden (occult) blood in three stool samples—performed yearly;Flexible sigmoidoscopy uses a flexible, lighted tube (sigmoidoscope) to visual-ly inspect the interior walls of the rectum and part of the colon—performed every five years;Colonoscopy uses a longer flexible, lighted tube (colonoscope) to visually inspect the interior walls of the rectum and the entire colon—performed every 10 years;Double barium contrast enema uses X-rays of the colon and rectum, with an enema containing barium dye—performed every five years.

Sources: www.cdc.gov/colorectalcancer/for_healthcare/screening_guidelines.htm, www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/

n

n

n

n

s

s

s

s

What CDC Is Doing to Help States“

”

We made promoting colorectal cancer awareness and screening a priority in

Illinois. In 2003, we mandated that colonoscopy tests have to be covered under

insurance plans in the state, and in 2005 we created a tax checkoff that allows

taxpayers to donate directly to our colorectal cancer awareness program.

—Illinois state Sen. Donne E. Trotter

Funding for State EffortsIn addition to supporting and conduct-

ing research to improve understanding about colorectal cancer screening, the CDC provides funding to 21 state pro-grams to implement specific colorectal cancer prevention strategies through National Comprehensive Cancer Con-trol Program initiatives.

In 2006, Congress directed $14.5 mil-lion to the CDC to fund programs aimed at fighting colorectal cancer, including outreach programs for minorities. The money is allotted through various states’ comprehensive cancer control plans. CDC’s national efforts to reduce cancer disparities include:

Improving early cancer detection through promotion of colorectal cancer screening, and

n

Implementing effective community interventions to increase screening and modify risk behaviors.

Screen for Life CampaignCDC’s Screen for Life: National

Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign informs men and women 50 or older about the importance of having regu-lar colorectal cancer screening tests. Screen for Life materials include print and broadcast public service announce-ments featuring Katie Couric, Morgan Freeman and Diane Keaton, as well as educational campaign materials in Eng-lish and Spanish for patients and health professionals. Print materials—including fact sheets, brochures and posters—and public service announcements can be viewed, printed and ordered online. For

n more information, please visit www.cdc.gov/screenforlife.

Demonstration ProgramsIn 2005, CDC awarded $2.1 million

to establish five projects to gather evi-dence on what works to increase use of colorectal cancer screening. The three-year program is aimed at increasing screening among low-income men and women 50 and older who have inad-equate or no health insurance coverage for colorectal cancer screening. The five sites are in New York, Nebraska, Mis-souri, Maryland and Washington state. Two projects specifically focus on the African-American population and one focuses on the American Indian popula-tion. For more information see: www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/press/colorectal_cancer.htm.

What CDC is Doing to Help States

Notes

1 U.S. Cancer Statistics: 2002 Incidence and Mortal-ity, U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group, 2005 and National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 53, No. 5, 2004.

2 American Cancer Society. “Cancer Facts & Figures for African Americans 2005-2006”. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2005. Available from URL: www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2005AACorrPWSecured.pdf

3 The Centers for Disease Control and Preven-tion: “Preventing Chronic Disease- Investing Wisely in Health.” www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/publications/factsheets/Prevention/pdf/cancer.pdf

4 Pignone et al. “Cost-effectiveness Analyses of Colorectal Cancer Screening.” Annals of Internal Medi-cine 2002; 137(2):96-104. Access at: www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/colorectal/colocost1.htm.

5 Seeff, L.C.; King, J.B.; Pollack, L.A.; and Williams, K.N. “Increased Use of Colorectal Cancer Tests—United States, 2002 and 2004.” Morbility and Mortality Weekly Report 2006; 55 (11): 308-311.

6 The National Colorectal Cancer Research Alliance. NCCRA: 2005 “Colorectal Cancer Legislation Report Card.” www.ccalliance.org/pdfs/2005NCCRARptCd.pdf

7 The Delaware Division of Public Health. “Partners in Prevention: Working to Prevent Colorectal Cancer.” www.dhss.delaware.gov/dhss/dph/dpc/partners_preven-tion.html

healthy states briefThe Council of State GovernmentsP.O. Box 11910Lexington, KY 40578-1910

www.healthystates.csg.org

Nonprofit Organization

U.S. Postage

PAID

Lexington, KY 40578

Permit No. 355

resourcesCDC Cancer Prevention and Control, Colorectal Cancer www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/www.cdc.gov/colorectalcancer/what_cdc_is_doing/about_cdc_program.htm#activitieswww.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/what_cdc_is_doing/sfl/www.cdc.gov/cancer/survivorship/what_cdc_is_doing/resources.htm

American Cancer Societywww.cancer.orgwww.cancer.org/downloads/COM/OHColorectalCancerMediaKit2006.pdf

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Minority Healthwww.omhrc.gov

healthy states brief:colorectal cancer prevention

Volume 1, Number 9

Healthy States Briefs highlight trends and promis-ing practices in state public health policy. The Healthy States Initiative is a partnership among the Council of State Governments (CSG), the National Black Caucus of State Legislators (NBCSL) and the National Hispan-ic Caucus of State Legislators (NHCSL). The initiative is supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

This Healthy States Brief was written by Deana McRae, Health Program Manager and Health Policy Associate at the NBCSL. Founded in 1977, NBCSL represents more than 600 legislators from 46 states that represent more than 30 million voters. For more information, visit www.nbcsl.com.

www.healthystates.csg.org

Funding for CSG’s Healthy States Initiative is pro-vided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, under cooperative agreement U38/CCU424348. The contents of this Healthy States Brief are the respon-sibility of CSG’s Healthy States Initiative and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NBCSL, CSG or CDC.

�

Reprintedhereareexamplesofenacted legislation fromfourstates relating topreventingcolorectalcancer:

Delaware Senate Bill 102 (2003), creating the Delaware Cancer ConsortiumNorth Carolina Senate Bill 132 (2001), requiring coverage for colorectal cancer screeningNew York Senate Bill 4691 (2005), extending medical assistance to colorectal cancer patientsOregon Senate Bill 501 (2005), requiring health insurance coverage for colorectal cancer screenings

Thereprintedlegislationisofferedtoillustratehowsomestatesaretakinglegislativeactiontocontrolthiscancer.

Note: The Healthy States Initiative does not necessarily endorse this legislation; nor has it conducted any independent evaluation of the legislation reprinted here.

Delaware Senate Bill 102 (2003):Creates Delaware Cancer Consortium

In2003,theDelawarelegislatureenactedSenateBill102tocreatetheDelawareCancerCon-sortium,acollaborativeeffortamongprivateandpublicentitiestoimplementcancercontrolinitiatives,includinginitiativesaimedatincreasingcolorectalcancerscreening.

DELAWARESTATESENATE142ndGENERALASSEMBLYSENATEBILLNO.102

ANACTTOAMENDTITLE16OFTHEDELAWARECODETOCREATEADELAWARECANCERCONSORTIUM

WHEREAS,theDelawareAdvisoryCouncilonCancerIncidenceandMortality(the“Advi-soryCouncil”)wascreatedbySenateJointResolution2ofthe141stGeneralAssembly;andWHEREAS,theAdvisoryCouncilissuedareportinApril2002containingaseriesofrecom-mendationstoreducetheincidenceandmortalityofcancerinDelaware;andWHEREAS, the Advisory Council’s recommendations cover a period of five years from the dateofitsreport,andinvolvetheactiveparticipationofmanymembersofthepublicandpri-vatesectors;andWHEREAS,itisimportantthatanentitybeestablishedtoadvocateforandmonitorachieve-mentoftheAdvisoryCouncil’srecommendations;

n

n

n

n



�

BEITENACTEDBYTHEGENERALASSEMBLYOFTHESTATEOFDELAWARE:Section 1.Amend§133,Title16,DelawareCode,bydeletingsubsection(b),andreplacingitwiththefollowing:“(b)TheDelawareCancerConsortium(“Consortium”)shallcoordinatecancerpreventionandcontrolactivitiesintheStateofDelaware.TheConsortiumwill:

Provide advice and support to state agencies, cancer centers, cancer control organizations, and health care practitioners regarding their role in reducing mortality and morbidity from cancer.Facilitate collaborative partnerships among public health agencies, cancer centers, and all other interested agencies and organizations to carry out recommended cancer control strategies.On at least a biennial basis, analyze the burden of cancer in Delaware and progress toward reducing cancer incidence and mortality.

Section 2. Amend§133,Title16,DelawareCode,byaddingthefollowingnewsubsections:“(c)TheConsortium’sprioritiesandadvocacyagendashallbedictatedbytherecommendationscontainedin‘TurningCommitmentIntoAction—RecommendationsoftheAdvisoryCouncilonCancerIncidenceandMortality,’publishedinApril2002.

(d)TheConsortium’spermanentmembershipshallbeasfollows:Two representatives of the Delaware House of Representatives and two representatives of the Delaware State Senate (one selected by each caucus);One representative of the governor’s office;

i.

ii.

iii.

i.

ii.

�

The secretary of the Department of Health and Social Services or his or her designee;One representative of the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control;One representative of the Medical Society of Delaware to be appointed by the governor;One professor from Delaware State University or the University of Delaware, to be ap-pointed by the governor;Two physicians with relevant medical knowledge, to be appointed by the governor;One representative of a Delaware hospital cancer center to be appointed by the governor;Three public members with relevant professional experience and knowledge, to be ap-pointed by the governor.

(e)Appointees to theConsortiumshallserveat thepleasureof thepersonorentity thatap-pointedthem.(f)TheConsortium’spermanentmembersmayenactprocedurestoappointadditionalpersonstotheConsortium.(g)TheConsortiumshallhaveachairandavice-chair,tobeappointedfromamongtheperma-nentmembersbytheGovernorandtoserveatthepleasureoftheGovernor.StaffsupportfortheConsortiumshallbeprovidedbytheDelawareDivisionofPublicHealth.”

North Carolina Senate Bill 132 (2001):Requires Coverage for Colorectal Cancer Screening

In2001,NorthCarolina’slegislatureenactedSenateBill132requiringhealthinsuranceplanstoprovidecoverageforcolorectalcancerscreening.

GENERALASSEMBLYOFNORTHCAROLINASESSION2001SESSIONLAW2001-116SENATEBILL132

ANACTTOREQUIREHEALTHINSURANCEPLANSTOPROVIDECOVERAGEFORCOLORECTALCANCERSCREENING.

TheGeneralAssemblyofNorthCarolinaenacts:Section 1. Article51ofChapter58oftheGeneralStatutesisamendedbyaddingthefollowingnewsectiontoread:“§58-3-179.Coverageforcolorectalcancerscreening.(a) Every health benefit plan, as defined in G.S. 58-3-167, shall provide coverage for colorec-talcancerexaminationsandlaboratorytestsforcancer,inaccordancewiththemostrecentlypublishedAmericanCancerSocietyguidelinesorguidelinesadoptedby theNorthCarolinaAdvisoryCommitteeonCancerCoordinationandControlforcolorectalcancerscreening,foranynonsymptomaticcoveredindividualwhois:

At least 50 years of age, orLess than 50 years of age and at high risk for colorectal cancer according to the most re-cently published colorectal cancer screening guidelines of the American Cancer Society or guidelines adopted by the North Carolina Advisory Committee on Cancer Coordina-tion and Control. The same deductibles, coinsurance, and other limitations as apply to similar services covered under the plan apply to coverage for colorectal examinations and laboratory tests required to be covered under this section.”

Section 2.G.S.58-50-155readsasrewritten:“§58-50-155.Standardandbasichealthcareplancoverages.

iii.

iv.

v.

vi.

vii.

viii.

ix.

1.

2.

�

(a)NotwithstandingG.S.58-50-125(c),thestandardhealthplandevelopedandapprovedunderG.S.58-50-125shallprovidecoverageforallofthefollowing:

Mammograms and pap smears at least equal to the coverage required by G.S. 58-51-57.Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests or equivalent tests for the presence of prostate can-cer at least equal to the coverage required by G.S. 58-51-58.Reconstructive breast surgery resulting from a mastectomy at least equal to the coverage required by G.S. 58-51-62.For a qualified individual, scientifically proven bone mass measurement for the diag-nosis and evaluation of osteoporosis or low bone mass at least equal to the coverage required by G.S.58-3-174.Prescribed contraceptive drugs or devices that prevent pregnancy and that are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for use as contraceptives, or outpa-tient contraceptive services at least equal to the coverage required by G.S. 58-3-178, if the plan covers prescription drugs or devices, or outpatient services, as applicable. The same exceptions and exclusions as are provided under G.S. 58-3-178 apply to standard plans developed and approved under G.S. 58-50-125.

Colorectal cancer examinations and laboratory tests at least equal to the coverage re-quired by G.S. 58-3-179.

(b)NotwithstandingG.S.58-50-125(c),indevelopingandapprovingtheplansunderG.S.58-50-125,theCommitteeandCommissionershallgivedueconsiderationtocost-effectiveandlife-savinghealthcareservicesandtocost-effectivehealthcareproviders.”Section 3. This act becomes effective January 1, 2002, and applies to all health benefit plans thataredelivered,issuedfordelivery,orrenewedonandafterthatdate.Forthepurposesofthisact, renewal of a health benefit plan is presumed to occur on each anniversary of the date on which coverage was first effective on the person or persons covered by the health benefit plan. In the General Assembly read three times and ratified this the 16th day of May, 2001.

New York Senate Bill 4691 (2005):Extending Medical Assistance to Colorectal Cancer Patients

In2005,theNewYorklegislatureenactedSenateBill4691(anditscompanionAssemblyBill6763)toprovideMedicaidtreatmentcoveragecostsforuninsuredpeoplediagnosedwithcoloncancerbylocalstate-fundedscreeningprograms.

STATEOFNEWYORK4691--A2005-2006RegularSessionsINSENATE

ANACTtoamendthepublichealthlaw,inrelationtoextendingmedicalassistancetopersonswithbreast,cervical,colonorprostatecancer;andtoamendthesocialserviceslaw,inrelationtothemedicalassistancepresumptiveeligibilityprogram.ThePeopleoftheStateofNewYork,representedinSenateandAssembly,doenactasfollows:Section 1. Subdivision1ofsection2406ofthepublichealthlaw,asamendedbychapter334ofthelawsof1990,isamendedtoreadasfollows:1.Thecommissioner,inconsultationwiththebreastcancerdetectionandeducationprogramadvisorycouncilestablishedpursuanttosection2407ofthistitle,shallmakegrantswithintheamounts appropriated to approved organizations, as defined in subdivision three of this section, fortheprovisionofservicesrelatingtothescreeninganddetectionofbreastcanceraspartofthisprogram.Suchservicesshallincludebutnotbelimitedto:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

�

promotion and provision of early detection of breast cancer, including mammography, clinical examination, and breast self-examination;provision of counseling and information on treatment options and referral for appropriate medical treatment;dissemination of information to unserved and underserved populations, to the general public and to health care professionals concerning breast cancer, the benefits of early detection and treatment, and the availability of breast cancer screening services;identification of local breast cancer screening services within the approved organiza-tion’s region; provision of information, counseling and referral services to individuals diagnosed with breast cancer; andprovision of information regarding the availability of medical assistance, including medical assistance under paragraph (v) of subdivision four of section 366 of the social services law, to an individual who requires treatment for breast, cervical, colon or prostate cancer.

2.Subparagraph4ofparagraph(v)ofsubdivision4ofsection366ofthesocialserviceslaw,asaddedbysection56ofpartAofchapter1ofthelawsof2002,isamendedtoreadasfollows:

4. The commissioner of health shall promulgate such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this paragraph. Such regulations shall include, but not be lim-ited to: eligibility requirements; a description of the medical services which are covered; and a process for providing presumptive eligibility when a qualified entity, as defined by the commissioner, determines on the basis of preliminary information that a person meets the requirements for eligibility under this paragraph.For purposes of determining eligibility for medical assistance under this paragraph, re-sources available to such individual shall not be considered nor required to be applied toward the payment or part payment of the cost of medical care, services and supplies available under this paragraph.An individual shall be eligible for presumptive eligibility for medical assistance under this paragraph in accordance with subdivision five of section 364-i of this title.

3.Section364-iofthesocialserviceslawisamendedbyaddinganewsubdivision5toreadasfollows:

5.Persons inneedof treatmentforbreast,cervical,colonorprostatecancer;presumptiveeligibility.

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

i.

ii.

iii.

�

An individual shall be presumed to be eligible for medical assistance under this title beginning on the date that a qualified entity, as defined in paragraph (c) of this subdivi-sion, determines, on the basis of preliminary information, that the individual meets the requirements of paragraph (v) or (v-1) of subdivision four of section 366 of this title.

Such presumptive eligibility shall continue through the earlier of the day on which a determination is made with respect to the eligibility of such individual for services, or in the case of such an individual who does not file an application by the last day of the month following the month during which the qualified entity makes the determination of presumptive eligibility, such last day.

For the purposes of this subdivision, “qualified entity” means an entity that provides medical assistance approved under this title, and is determined by the department of health to be capable of making determinations of presumptive eligibility under this sub-division.

Care, services and supplies, as set forth in section 365-a of this title, that are furnished to an individual during a presumptive eligibility period under this subdivision by an entity that is eligible for payments under this title shall be deemed to be medical assistance for purposes of payment and state reimbursement.

4.Subdivision4ofsection366ofthesocialserviceslawisamendedbyaddinganewparagraph(v-1)toreadasfollows:

(v-1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a person who has been screened or referred for screening for colon or prostate cancer by the cancer services screening program, as administered by the department of health, and has been diagnosed with colon or prostate cancer is eligible for medical assistance for the duration of his or her treatment for such cancer.

Persons eligible for medical assistance under this paragraph shall have an income of 250 percent or less of the comparable federal income official poverty line as defined and an-nually revised by he federal office of management and budget.

An individual shall be eligible for presumptive eligibility for medical assistance under this paragraph in accordance with subdivision five of section 464-i of this title.

Medical assistance is available under this paragraph to persons who are under 65 years of age, and are not otherwise covered under creditable coverage as defined in the federal Public Health Service Act.

5.Subdivision1ofsection368-aofthesocialserviceslawisamendedbyaddinganewpara-graph(y)toreadasfollows:

a.

b.

c.

d.

1.

2.

3.

4.

�

(y)Onehundredpercentoftheamountexpendedforhealthcareservicesasdeterminedinaccordancewithparagraph(v-1)ofsubdivisionfourofsectionthreehundredsixty-sixofthistitle, after first deducting therefrom any federal funds properly received or to be received on accountthereof.

6.ThisactshalltakeeffectApril1,2007;providedthatthedepartmentofhealthshallpromul-gateanyrulesorregulationsnecessarytoimplementthisactpriortosuchdate;andprovidedthattheamendmenttosection364-iofthesocialserviceslawmadebysectionthreeofthisactshallsurvivetheexpirationandreversionofsuchsectionasprovidedinsection2ofchapter693ofthelawsof1996,asamended.

Oregon Senate Bill 501 (2005): Requiring Health Insurance Coverage for Colorectal Cancer Screenings

In2005,theOregonlegislatureenactedSenateBill501thatrequiredhealthinsurerstopro-videcoverageforrecommendedcolorectalscreeningsandtests.

73rdOREGONLEGISLATIVEASSEMBLY--2005RegularSessionEnrolledSenateBill501

ANACTRelatingtohealthinsurance;anddeclaringanemergency.BeItEnactedbythePeopleoftheStateofOregon:

Section 1.Section2ofthis2005ActisaddedtoandmadeapartofORS743.730to743.773.Section 2. (1) Each carrier offering a health benefit plan shall submit to the Director of the DepartmentofConsumerandBusinessServicesonorbeforeApril1ofeachyearareportthatcontains:

A.Thefollowinginformationfortheprecedingyearthatisderivedfromtheexhibitofpre-miums,enrollmentandutilizationincludedinthecarrier’sannualreport:

The total number of members;

The total amount of premiums;

The total amount of costs for claims;

The medical loss ratio;

The average amount of premiums per member per month; and

The percentage change in the average premium per member per month, measured from the previous year.

B. The following aggregate financial information for the preceding year that is derived from thecarrier’sannualreport:

The total amount of general administrative expenses, including identification of the five largest nonmedical administrative expenses and the assessment against the car-rier for the Oregon Medical Insurance Pool;

The total amount of the surplus maintained;

The total amount of the reserves maintained for unpaid claims;

The total net underwriting gain or loss; and

The carrier’s net income after taxes.

(2)Acarriershallelectronicallysubmittheinformationdescribedinsubsection(1)ofthissec-tioninaformatandaccordingtoinstructionsprescribedbytheDepartmentofConsumerandBusinessServicesbyruleafterobtainingarecommendationfromtheHealthInsuranceReformAdvisoryCommittee.

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

�

(3)Theadvisorycommitteeshallevaluatethereportingrequirementsundersubsection(1)(a)ofthissectionbythefollowingmarketsegments:

Individual health benefit plans;

Health benefit plans for small employers;

Health benefit plans for employers described in ORS 743.733; and

Health benefit plans for employers with more than 50 employees.

(4)Thedepartmentshallmaketheinformationreportedunderthissectionavailabletothepub-licthroughasearchablepublicwebsiteontheInternet.Section 3.Notwithstandingsection2(1)ofthis2005Act,acarrierdescribedinsection2(1)of this 2005 Act shall submit its first report to the Director of the Department of Consumer and BusinessServicesonorbeforeJuly1,2006.Section 4. Notwithstandingsection2(1)ofthis2005Act,acarriershallincludetheinformationdescribedinsection2(1)(a)(F)ofthis2005Actbeginningwiththeannualreportfor2007.Section 5. Section6ofthis2005ActisaddedtoandmadeapartoftheInsuranceCode.Section 6. (1)An insurerofferingahealth insurancepolicy thatcovershospital,medicalorsurgical expenses, other than coverage limited to expenses from accidents or specific diseases, shallprovidecoverageforthefollowingcolorectalcancerscreeningexaminationsandlabora-torytests:

For an insured 50 years of age or older:

One fecal occult blood test per year plus one flexible sigmoidoscopy every five years;

One colonoscopy every 10 years; or

One double contrast barium enema every five years.

B.Foraninsuredwhoisathighriskforcolorectalcancer,colorectalcancerscreeningexami-nationsandlaboratorytestsasrecommendedbythetreatingphysician.

(2)Forthepurposesofsubsection(1)(b)ofthissection,anindividualisathighriskforcolorec-talcanceriftheindividualhas:

A family medical history of colorectal cancer;

A prior occurrence of cancer or precursor neoplastic polyps;

A prior occurrence of a chronic digestive disease condition such as inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis; or

Other predisposing factors.

(3) Health care service contractors, as defined in ORS 750.005, and trusts carrying out a multi-ple employer welfare arrangement, as defined in ORS 750.301, are also subject to this section.Section 7. Section6ofthis2005ActappliestohealthinsurancepoliciesissuedorrenewedonorafterJanuary1,2006.Section 8. This2005Actbeingnecessary for the immediatepreservationof thepublicpeace,healthandsafety,anemergencyisdeclaredtoexist,andthis2005Acttakeseffectonitspassage.

A.

B.

C.

D.

A.

A.

B.

C.

A.

B.

C.

D.

�

Thisguide,designedforstatelegislators,highlightsavarietyofWeb-basedresourcesaboutpreventingcolorectalcancer. Policymakerswillfindlinkstothefollowinginformationinthisguide:

CancerStatisticsbyState

InformationonStateLegislativeEfforts

CDCProgramsforStates

CancerTreatment,PreventionandResearchResources

ExpertPolicyRecommendations

ResourcesforConstituents

Cancer Statistics by State

StatepolicymakerslookingforstatisticalprofilesofthecolorectalcancerburdenintheirstatecanfindthatinformationatthefollowingWebsites:

National Program of Cancer Registrieshttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr ThisCDCsitecollectsdataprovidedbystatecancerregistriesandmakesthemavailableforusebyhealthprofessionalsandpolicymakers.Policymakerscanusethesitetocomparestatecancerstatisticswithnationalstatistics,findthe top10cancersbygeographicareaandtodisplayotherinformation.

State Cancer Burden Data Fact Sheetshttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/cancerburdenLinkedtotheNationalProgramofCancerRegistries,thispageprovidesdataonlungcancer,colorectalcancer,breastcancerandprostatecancerineverystate.Factsheetscanbegener-atedforeachstatethatincludetheestimatednumberofnewcancercasesandcancerdeaths,andtheage-adjustedmortalityratesforcancerdeathsbyrace.

National Cancer Institute’s State Cancer Profileshttp://statecancerprofiles.cancer.govThissitefeaturesanumberofcustomizableoptionsfordisplayingcancerstatistics,includ-ingcolorectalcancerdeathandincidenceratesbystate.Userscancreatechartsandgraphsshowinghistoricaltrendsincancerratesintheirstatesandcomparecancerratechangesinacountywiththatoftheentirestateorcomparethestate’sratewiththenationalrate.

n

n

n

n

n

n


Resource Guide for State Policymakers

�

Information on State Legislative Efforts

State Legislative Report Card The National Colorectal Cancer ResearchAlliance (NCCRA) has created a “ColorectalCancerLegislationReportCard”thatevaluateseachstate’spreventivescreeninglegislationagainstspecificcriteria.TheNCCRA,aprogramoftheEntertainmentIndustryFoundation,wasfoundedinpartbytelevisionanchorKatieCouric.TolearnhowNCCRAgradesyourstate,visithttp://www.eifoundation.org/national/nccra/report_card/reportcard_2006.pdf.

State Legislative Database TheNationalCancerInstitute’sStateCancerLegislativeDatabaseProgramcontainsdown-loadablefactsheetswith50-statechartsandchecklistsdetailingthemajorprovisionsofeachstate’scolorectalcancerscreeninglaws.Downloadthefactsheetathttp://www.scld-nci.net.

CDC’s Funding of State Programs

WhiletheCentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention(CDC)fundsandconductsresearchtoimproveunderstandingaboutcolorectalcancerscreening,theagencyalsofundsstatepre-ventionstrategies. WithfundingfromtheNationalComprehensiveCancerControlProgram,Alabama,Colo-rado,Delaware,Georgia,Iowa,Kentucky,Louisiana,Massachusetts,Michigan,NewYork,NorthCarolina,Ohio,RhodeIsland,Utah,WashingtonandWestVirginiaareimplementingcolorectalcancerstrategiesaspartoftheircomprehensivecancercontrolplans.Thesepro-gramsmayserveasmodelsforotherstates.TolearnmoreabouttheNationalComprehensiveCancerControlProgram,visithttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/ncccp.

CDC’s Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program

From 2005–2006, CDC awarded $4.7 million to five sites to establish colorectal cancerscreeningand follow-upprograms for low-incomeunder anduninsuredAmericansaged50andover.Eachsiteinthethree-yearprogramwillofferscreeningandfollow-upservices;out-reachservices;publicandprofessionaleducation;casemanagement;willcontinuallyevaluatethecostandeffectivenessoftheprogramandwillplaceahighemphasisonthequalityoftheservices delivered.The five sites are inNewYork (SuffolkCounty),Nebraska (statewide),Missouri(St.Louis),Maryland(Baltimore)andWashingtonstate(Clallam,JeffersonandKingcounties).Formoreinformationaboutthedemonstrationprogram,gotohttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/what_cdc_is_doing/research/demonstration.htm.

�

Resources on Cancer Treatment, Prevention and Research

Inadditiontotheprogramsandorganizationsalreadymentionedthatofferresourcesdi-rectlyrelatedtostateeffortstopreventcolorectalcancer,statelegislatorsinterestedinlearn-ingmoreabout colorectal cancer researchandadvocacyefforts aswell asbroader cancerpreventionpolicesmightwanttovisittheWebsiteslistedbelow.

American Cancer Societyhttp://www.cancer.org TheAmericanCancerSociety(ACS)isanationwide,community-basedvolunteerhealthor-ganization.BasedinAtlanta,theACShasstatedivisionsandmorethan3,400localoffices.ACSoffersawealthofresourcesaboutcancer,cancertreatmentsandwaysofpreventingcancer.

C-Changehttp://www.c-changetogether.org C-Changehasgatheredmanyofthenation’skeycancerleadersfromgovernment,busi-nessandnonprofitsectorstoserveasaforumandspurtopushforcollaborativeapproachestoeliminatecancerasamajorpublichealthproblem.ThemembershipoftheorganizationsincludesformerPresidentGeorgeH.W.BushandU.S.senators,aswellasheadsofmajornationalcorporations.

Cancer Control Planethttp://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov CancerControlPlanetisaWebportalaimedatprovidingaccesstodataandresourcesthatcanhelpcancercontrolplanners,healtheducators,programstaffandresearchersdesign,imple-mentandevaluateevidence-basedcancercontrolprograms.TheportalprovidesaccesstoWeb-basedresources thatcanhelp inassessingthecancerand/orriskfactorburdenofstatesandidentifyingpotentialpartnerorganizationsthatmayalreadybeworkingwithhigh-riskpopula-tions.TheWebsiteissponsoredbymanyorganizationsandagencies,includingtheNationalCancerInstitute,CDCandtheAmericanCancerSociety.

Cancer Research and Prevention Foundationhttp://www.preventcancer.org TheCancerResearchandPreventionFoundationisanonprofithealthfoundationdedicatedtothepreventionandearlydetectionofcancerssuchascolorectal,cervical,breast,lung,skin,testicularandoralcancersthatcanbepreventedthroughlifestylechangesorearlystagedetec-tionandtreatment.

CDC’s National Comprehensive Cancer Control Programhttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/ncccp TheCDC’sNationalComprehensiveControlProgramhelpsstatesdevelopcomprehensiveap-proachestocancercontrol.Astatecomprehensivecancercontrolplaninvolvesimprovingco-ordinationofallofastate’scancerpreventionandcontrolactivities,includingthoserelatedtocolorectalcancer.Startedin1998withfundingforjustsixprograms,theCDCnowfundscom-prehensivecancerplanningandimplementationeffortsinall50states.Tofindacontactforyourstate’scancerplan,visithttp://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/CancerContacts/ncccp/contactlist.asp.

Colon Cancer Alliancehttp://www.ccalliance.org TheColonCancerAlliance isanonprofitorganizationofcolonandrectalcancersurvi-vors,theirfamilies,caregivers,peoplegeneticallypredisposedtothediseaseandthemedicalcommunity.Theorganization,whichhasmorethan37,000members,isdedicatedtopatientsupport,advocacyandeducation.

�

National Cancer Institutehttp://www.cancer.gov TheNationalCancerInstitute(NCI)ispartoftheNationalInstitutesofHealth,oneofeightagenciesthatcomprisethePublicHealthServiceintheDepartmentofHealthandHumanServices(HHS).TheNCIisthefederalgovernment’sprincipalagencybringingtogethertheresourcestostimulateandsupportscientificdiscoveryanditsapplicationtoachieveafuturewhereallcancersareuncommonandeasilytreated.NCIalsoproducesandmakesavailablemanycancerpreventionresourcesforpolicymakersandthegeneralpublic.

National Colorectal Cancer Research Alliancehttp://www.eifoundation.org/national/nccra TheNationalColorectalCancerResearchAlliance(NCCRA)isaprogramoftheEntertain-ment IndustryFoundation(EIF),acharitableorganizationassociatedwith theentertainmentindustry.AllfundsraisedbyNCCRAarespentoncolorectalcancerawarenesseffortsandre-search.TheprogramwasfoundedbytelevisionnewsanchorKatieCouric,canceractivistLillyTartikoffandEIF.

National Colorectal Cancer Roundtablehttp://www.nccrt.org Startedin1997incooperationwithCDCandtheAmericanCancerSociety,theNationalColorectalCancerRoundtable(NCCRT)isacoalitionofmorethan50public,privateandvolunteer organizations and includesmemberswhoare cancer survivors, scientists, advo-cates,businesspeopleandhealthinsurers,amongothers.Theorganizationservesasaforumfor members to share ideas and information about gaps in colorectal cancer research andwaystoimprovepreventionpolicies.

Resources on Cancer Treatment, Prevention and Research continued

�

Policies and Practices That Work: Expert Recommendations

Legislatorscanaccessthreesetsofexpertpolicyrecommendationsonpreventingcolorec-tal cancer.Two independent panels of experts, theTask Force on Community PreventiveServicesandtheU.S.PreventiveServicesTaskForce,havedistilledthelatestscienceintorecommendationsaboutthemosteffectivepracticesandpoliciesforpreventingchronicdis-eases, includingcolorectalcancer.TheAmericanCancerSocietyhasalsoreleasedrecom-mendationsforcolorectalcancerscreening.

Task Force on Community Preventive Services TheTaskForceonCommunityPreventiveServicespublishes theGuide toCommunityPreventiveServices(CommunityGuide).ThetaskforceisappointedbythedirectoroftheCDC,butisanindependentdecision-makingbody. The Community Guide evaluates public health prevention strategies—that is, strategiesaimedatpopulationsratherthanindividuals.TherecommendationstheCommunityGuideoffersarebasedonthestrengthoftheevidenceofeffectivenessfoundthroughasystematicreviewofpublishedresearchconductedbyateamofexperts. Whatareeffectivestrategiesforincreasingscreeningforcolorectalcancer?Accordingtotheguide,thereisstrongevidencethatreducingstructuralbarrierstoscreeningiseffective.“Reducingstructuralbarriers”meansmakingiteasierforpatients toaccessscreeningser-vicesbyovercomingtransportationproblems,keepingclinicsopenduringmoreconvenienthoursandofferingchildcare. Seetheguide’srecommendationsoncolorectalcancerathttp://www.thecommunityguide.org/cancer.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force TheU.S.PreventiveServicesTaskForce,sponsoredbythefederalgovernment’sAgencyforHealthcareResearchandQuality,publishestheGuidetoClinicalPreventiveServices. Afterconductingrigorous,impartialassessmentsoftheevidenceforabroadrangeofclini-calpreventiveservices,theGuidetoClinicalServicesissuesmedicalcarerecommendationsforindividualpatients. TheU.S.PreventiveServicesTaskForce:“stronglyrecommendsthatcliniciansscreenmenandwomenaged50andolderwhoareataverageriskforcolorectalcancer.” Formoredetailsontheseclinicalrecommendations,gotohttp://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/usp-stf/uspscolo.htm.

American Cancer Society TheAmerican Cancer Society recommends four screening strategies, which can be usedaloneorincombination:

Fecaloccultbloodtest(FOBT),whichchecksforhidden(occult)bloodinthreeconsecu-tivestoolsamples,performedyearly;Flexiblesigmoidoscopy,inwhichphysiciansuseaflexible,lightedtube(sigmoidoscope)tovisuallyinspecttheinteriorwallsoftherectumandpartofthecolon,performedeveryfiveyears;Colonoscopy,inwhichphysiciansuseaflexible,lightedtube(colonoscope),whichislon-ger than thesigmoidoscope, tovisually inspect the interiorwallsof the rectumand theentirecolon,performedevery10years;andDouble barium contrast enema consists of a series of X-rays of the colon and rectum,whicharetakenafterthepatientisgivenanenemacontainingbariumdyefollowedbyaninjectionofairinthelowerbowel,performedeveryfiveyears.

For more information about these recommendations, visithttp://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_2_3X_ACS_Cancer_Detection_Guidelines_36.asp.

n

n

n

n

�

Resources for Constituents

Asastatelegislator,youcanplayaroleinhelpingtoinformyourconstituentsaboutthebenefitsofcolorectalcancerscreeningbymakingavarietyofbrochuresandfactsheetsavail-ableinyouroffice,highlightingthesubjectinnewslettersorin“townhall”meetingsandbylinkingtopubliceducationresourcesfromyourlegislativeWebsite. Youcandownload,orderorlinktoresourcesforyourconstituentsfromtheseWebsites:

American Cancer Societyhttp://www.cancer.org/docroot/lrn/lrn_0.asp TheAmericanCancerSociety’sColonandRectumCancerWebpageisanexcellentlinkforconstituents.Atthesite,constituentscanlearnaboutriskfactorsforcolorectalcancerandaboutpreventionandtreatment. ThesitealsoprovideslinkstootherrelatedWebsitesandtobooks,brochuresandotherpublicationsaboutcolorectalcancer.

Other CDC Resourceshttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/basic_info InadditiontoitsScreenforLifecampaign(seebelow),thisCDCcolorectalcancerWebpageoffersaquicksummaryofkeyinformationwrittenforageneralpublicaudience. Thissiteprovidesinformationforconstituentssuchas“fastfacts”aboutcolorectalcancer,aconciseexplanationofthebenefitsofscreening,tipsonhowtoreducerisksforthecancer,statisticsaboutwhogetsthecancerandaglossaryofcolorectalcancerterms.

Screen for Lifehttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/sfl http://www.cec.gov/cancer/colorectal/publications/materials_spanish.htm (Spanish materials) CDC’sScreenforLifeNationalColorectalCancerActionCampaignisamulti-yearandmulti-mediacampaignaimedateducatingAmericansaboutthebenefitsofcolorectalcancerscreening. Theprimarytargetaudienceofthecampaignismenandwomenaged50andolder,theagegroupatgreatestriskofdevelopingthecancer.OtherkeyaudiencestargetedbythecampaignareMedicarerecipients,African-AmericansandHispanics. Thecampaignisheadlinedbytelevisionandradiopublicserviceannouncementsfeaturingwell-knownmediapersonalities,includingtelevisionanchorKatieCouric,andactorsDianeKeatonandMorganFreeman.ScreenforLife,whichpartnerswithstatehealthdepartments,alsousesavarietyofothermediatoreachitstargetaudiences. AtthisWebsite,youmaylinkto,downloadandreproduceororderprintedcopiesoffactsheets,brochures,postersandpublicserviceannouncements—allofwhicharefree.ManymaterialsareavailableinSpanish. ToordercopiesofScreenforLifeprintedmaterials,writeto: CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention DivisionofCancer:PreventionandControl 4770BufordHwy,NE MSK-64 Atlanta,GA30341-3717

[email protected] phone(800)488•4780

�

Facts on Screeninghttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/pdf/fs-patient-basic.pdf

Screen for Life Fact Sheets for Constituents

Informatión básica sobre los exámenes de detección http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/pdf/SFL_FactSheet_Spanish.pdf

Detailed Facts on Screeninghttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/pdf/fs-patient.pdf

Facts for People on Medicarewww.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/pdf/fs_medicare.pdf

�

The Council of State Governments' (CSG) Healthy States Initiative is designed to help state leaders make informed decisions on public health issues. The enterprise brings together state legislators, officials from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, state health department officials, and public health experts to share information, analyze trends, identify innovative responses, and provide expert advice on public health issues. CSG's partners in the initiative are the National Black Caucus of State Legislators and the National Hispanic Caucus of State Legislators.

Funding for this publication is provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, under Cooperative Agreement U38/CCU424348. Points of view in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. government.

Published June 2007



Talking Points



Resources Guide for State Policymakers

ß

ß

ß

ß

ß

CSG’s Healthy States Initiative

Trends analysis, innovative responses and expert advice on critical public health issues for states.

www.healthystates.csg.org859.244.8000

Documents

Preventing Colorectal Cancer2763,292...Use the media. Support colorectal cancer screening—if you or a family member are a cancer survivor, share your story. Know the toll of colorectal