9
Slid 1 Brad Sherrill UNEDF June 2010, Slide 1 Preferred Alternative Chosen for CD1 • Lowest cost configuration that meets technical requirements • Upgradable • Reviewed by ASAC, ESAC • Endorsed by mini-Lehman review March 17

Preferred Alternative Chosen for CD1

  • Upload
    whitby

  • View
    41

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Preferred Alternative Chosen for CD1. Lowest cost configuration that meets technical requirements Upgradable Reviewed by ASAC, ESAC Endorsed by mini-Lehman review March 17. FRIB Conceptual Overview. Rare isotope production with primary beams up to 400 kW, 200 MeV/u uranium - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Preferred Alternative Chosen for CD1

Slid 1Brad Sherrill UNEDF June 2010, Slide 1

Preferred Alternative Chosen for CD1

• Lowest cost configuration that meets technical requirements

• Upgradable• Reviewed by

ASAC, ESAC• Endorsed by mini-

Lehman review March 17

Page 2: Preferred Alternative Chosen for CD1

Slid 2Brad Sherrill UNEDF June 2010, Slide 2

FRIB Conceptual Overview

Rare isotope production with primary beams up to 400 kW, 200 MeV/u uranium

Fast, stopped and reaccelerated beam capability

ReA12 is outside scope of the project but MSU is building the building now, we hope to have this funded by NSF

Experimental areas and scientific instrumentation for fast, stopped and reaccelerated beams

Page 3: Preferred Alternative Chosen for CD1

Slid 3Brad Sherrill UNEDF June 2010, Slide 3

Folded FRIB LINAC details

Tunnel Floor~40 ft

below grade

Grade (ground) level

Physically compact layout

Minimize higher-cost subterranean structures

Single tunnel for all linac segments

Page 4: Preferred Alternative Chosen for CD1

Slid 4Brad Sherrill UNEDF June 2010, Slide 4

Preliminary Performance Baseline Schedule for 2018 Early Completion – CD-4 in 2020

CALENDAR YEARCALENDAR YEAR

Paced by Funding Profile Paced by Facilities Paced by Installation & Test

TPC covers schedule range

Page 5: Preferred Alternative Chosen for CD1

Slid 5Brad Sherrill UNEDF June 2010, Slide 5

FRIB Facility Upgrade Options

Light Ion Injector

300 MeV/u(additional

Cryomodules)

ISOL Target Facility

Multi-user operationMulti-user operation

Higher production ratesHigher production rates

Symmetry testsSH elementsApplications

Symmetry testsSH elementsApplications

Page 6: Preferred Alternative Chosen for CD1

Slid 6Brad Sherrill UNEDF June 2010, Slide 6

Available to

day

New territory to be explored with next-generation RIB facilities

The availability of rare isotopes over time

Nuclear Chart in 1966

Less than1000

about 3000

Page 7: Preferred Alternative Chosen for CD1

Slid 7Brad Sherrill UNEDF June 2010, Slide 7

What New Nuclides Will FRIB Produce?

• FRIB will produce more than 1000 NEW isotopes at useful rates (5000 available for study)

• Theory is key to making the right measurements

• Exciting prospects for study of nuclei along the drip line to mass 120 (compared to 24)

• Production of most of the key nuclei for astrophysical modeling

• Harvesting of unusual isotopes for a wide range of applications

Rates are available at http://groups.nscl.msu.edu/frib/rates/

Page 8: Preferred Alternative Chosen for CD1

Slid 8Brad Sherrill UNEDF June 2010, Slide 8

Study of long isochains

Page 9: Preferred Alternative Chosen for CD1

Slid 9Brad Sherrill UNEDF June 2010, Slide 9

Comments

• FRIB will open many opportunities in the study of atomic nuclei

– Nuclei along the drip lines

– Heavy r-process nuclei along N = 126

– Study of long isochains

• Theory is central to the success of FRIB

– We need theory to guide the program. What are the most sensitive measurements?

– We need reaction theory to interpret wave functions, occupancy, matter distributions, extract matrix elements, infer weak interaction strengths, etc.

• DOE and NSF must make a commensurate investment in theory - Now

• What do you need to make FRIB successful? The FRIB team an theory community must be committed to helping realize the needs.