Upload
educationnc
View
175
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DESTINATION TRANSFORMATION
How we got the POWER & used it!
Dr. Eddie Price, Principal
WHERE WE WERE -- SJHS 2010►Demographics: ►60% Caucasian, 23% Latino, 17% African
American►22% EC Population►50% Free/Reduced
►Mule Days Week►Fights in Courtyard, Hallway, and Bus Parking
Lot @ Homecoming Pep Rally►Non-Students on Campus ►Parents Fighting in Parking Lot► Stagnant, low test scores and teacher morale►The Colors: Blue – JoCo Hoover and Red -
Savage
WHERE WE ARE -- SJHS 2015
► North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey
► Four-Year Graduation Rate► Disciplinary Trend Data► EOC Trend Data► ACT Trend Data► AdvancED Survey – SIT Process
NC TEACHER WORKING CONDITIONS DATA – 2014
RESPONSE RATE & OVERARCHING CLIMATE
SJHS 2014
SJHS 2012
% CHANGE
CHS CVHS CHHS SSS WJHS
Response Rate 90.0 % 76.53% 13.47% 75.27% 58.54% 44.09% 50.0% 78.16%
The faculty and staff have a
shared vision.100.0% 98.6% 1.4% 80.0% 89.1% 82.5% 60.4% 69.4%
There is an atmosphere of
trust and mutual respect in this
school.
100.0% 94.5% 5.5% 70.0% 78.3% 70.7% 56.2% 50.0%
Teachers feel comfortable
raising issues and concerns that are
important to them.
97.5% 94.6% 2.9% 69.1% 70.8% 65.9% 60.4% 54.5%
TEACHER WORKING CONDITIONS COMPONENT: TIME
SJHS 2014
SJHS 2012
% CHANGE
CHS CVHS CHHS SSS WJHS
Class sizes are reasonable
79.0% 70.3% 8.7% 42.9% 37.5% 46.3% 59.2% 48.5%
Teachers have time to collaborate with
colleagues.98.8% 93.2% 5.6% 72.5% 81.2% 80.0% 77.6% 47.1%
Minimal interruptions 95.0% 79.7% 15.3% 59.4% 68.7% 65.9% 53.1% 55.2%
Non-instructional time provided is
sufficient.95.1% 81.1% 14.0% 75.4% 72.3% 76.9% 74.5% 61.8%
Efforts are made to minimize paperwork
82.3% 60.3% 22.0% 54.4% 43.5% 53.8% 47.9% 47.8%
Teachers have sufficient
instructional time93.6% 86.7% 6.9% 73.9% 72.3% 82.5% 75.5% 69.1%
Teachers are protected from duties
that interfere with their essential role of educating students.
100.0% 85.3% 14.7% 52.2% 70.2% 67.5% 58.3% 51.5%
TEACHER WORKING CONDITIONS COMPONENT: STUDENT
CONDUCTSJHS 2014
SJHS 2012
% CHANGE CHS CVHS CHHS SSS WJHS
Students understand
expectations100.0% 94.7% 5.3% 66.7% 85.4% 97.6% 71.4% 66.2%
Students follow rules of conduct.
94.9% 80.8% 14.1% 40.6% 83.0% 95.1% 22.4% 58.8%
Policies and procedures about student conduct
are clearly
98.7% 94.7% 4.0% 64.7% 91.7% 85.4% 77.1% 70.1%
School administrators
consistently enforce rules
96.2% 93.3% 2.9% 52.2% 79.2% 85.4% 45.8% 50.0%
School administrators
support teachers' efforts to maintain
discipline
98.7% 93.2% 5.5% 69.1% 91.7% 97.6% 63.8% 65.2%
Teachers consistently enforce rules
92.4% 78.7% 13.7% 50.7% 76.6% 66.7% 45.8% 61.2%
The faculty work in a school
environment that is safe.
100.0% 95.9% 4.1% 80.9% 100.0% 95.0% 77.6% 91.2%
TEACHER WORKING CONDITIONS COMPONENT : TEACHER
LEADERSHIPSJHS 2014
SJHS 2012 % CHANGE CHS CVHS CHHS SSS WJHS
Teachers are recognized as educational experts.
100.0% 89.0% 11.0% 75.4% 79.2% 75.6% 65.2% 72.7%
Teachers are trusted to make sound professional
decisions about instruction.
98.7% 90.4% 8.3% 81.2% 78.3% 75.6% 73.5% 80.3%
Teachers are relied upon to make decisions about
educational issues.97.4% 87.7% 9.7% 75.4% 76.6% 75.6% 68.7% 68.7%
Teachers are encouraged to participate in school
leadership roles.100.0% 97.2% 2.8% 82.4% 97.9% 87.8% 93.7% 79.1%
The faculty has an effective process for
making group decisions to solve problems.
100.0% 94.4% 5.6% 59.4% 76.6% 82.1% 72.7% 65.0%
In this school we take steps to solve problems.
100.0% 97.2% 2.8% 68.7% 89.1% 85.4% 72.3% 65.1%
Teachers are effective leaders in this school.
100.0% 94.5% 5.5% 78.8% 85.1% 80.5% 81.2% 92.3%
Teachers have an appropriate influence on
decision-making88.7% 83.3% 5.4% 61.5% 68.7% 65.0% 61.4% 47.7%
TEACHER WORKING CONDITIONS COMPONENT: INSTRUCTIONAL
SUPPORTSJHS SJHS
% CHANGE CHS CVHS CHHS SSS WJHS
State assessment data are available in time to impact
instructional practices.43.8% 84.8% -41.0% 45.9% 35.7% 40.0% 36.6% 33.9%
Local assessment data are available in time to impact
instructional practices.60.6% 91.0% -30.4% 55.9% 56.1% 50.0% 59.0% 58.9%
Teachers use assessment data to inform their instruction.
91.0% 95.6% -4.6% 77.6% 91.3% 70.3% 82.6% 72.6%
Provided supports translate to improvements in instructional
practices by teachers.97.4% 95.8% 1.6% 83.9% 84.1% 78.4% 79.5% 79.0%
Teachers are encouraged to try new things to improve instruction.
100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 95.3% 91.1% 82.5% 95.7% 90.8%
Teachers are assigned classes that maximize their likelihood of
success with students.93.0% 75.0% 18.0% 51.6% 77.8% 66.7% 43.2% 54.2%
Teachers have autonomy to make decisions about instructional
delivery (i.e. pacing, materials and pedagogy).
94.7% 85.9% 8.8% 81.2% 73.3% 74.4% 82.6% 78.8%
State assessments provide schools with data that can help improve
teaching.46.8% 67.1% -20.3% 37.7% 48.8% 56.8% 46.2% 41.0%
State assessments accurately gauge students’ understanding of
standards.29.9% 49.2% -19.3% 23.7% 35.7% 33.3% 20.0% 21.0%
SJHS 4-YEAR GRADUATION COHORT
Projected 95.7% - June 2015
SJHS DROPOUT NUMBERS
13 dropouts as of 5/1/15
SJHS DISCIPLINE AND EOC TREND DATA
Office Referrals
Biology Proficienc
y
Math I Proficienc
y
English II Proficienc
y
2012-2013 1,479 38.2% 28.8% 46.3%
2013-2014 596 49.2% 35.4% 53.0%
CHANGE -883 +11% +6.6% +6.7%
An Intervention Schedule:
POWER BLOCK Consensus: Dr. Phil, Rituals, and Teacher
Voice
Implementation: “A Seven Month Process” - Subcommittees and Objectives
Accountability: Teacher and Student
MOST IMPACTFUL CHANGE
DRINK THE JUICE
➢What is POWER?▪ PLAN▪ ORGANIZE▪ WORK▪ EAT▪ RELAX
Daily Bell Schedule1st Block: 7:15 – 8:37 (82 minutes)
2nd Block: 8:42 – 10:04 (82 minutes)
3rd Block: 10:09 – 11:31 (82 minutes)
POWER: 11:31 – 12:53 (82 minutes)
Power A:11:31 -- 12:11
Transition from POWER A to POWER B:
12:11 - 12:13
Power B: 12:13 -- 12:53
4th Block: 12:58 – 2:20 (82 minutes)
Weekly Teacher Schedule 2014-15 Power Schedule
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
CTE Tutorial B Super A & B Dept/PLC (Cox) Tutorial A
English Dept/PLC (Price) Tutorial B Tutorial A Super A
FAR Super B Dept/PLC (Ribar) Tutorial A Tutorial B
Math Tutorial A Tutorial B Super A Dept/PLC (Jernigan)
Physical Education Dept/PLC (Durham) Intramurals Intramurals Intramurals Intramurals
Science Tutorial A Dept/PLC (Jones) Tutorial B Super B
Social Studies Super A Tutorial A Dept/PLC (Avery) Tutorial B
EC Avery scheduleAvery schedule/Dept Meetings Super A & B Math Inc Tutorial English Inc Tutorial
Freshman Academy PLC (Jernigan)
Duty Roster
POWER DUTY SUPERVISION MON A MON B TUE A TUE B WED A WED B THUR A THUR B FRI A FRI B
Commons Food Line A. Adams A. Adams A. Adams A. Adams A. Adams A. Adams A. Adams A. Adams A. Adams Amy Adams
Commons Food Line McDougald Sulovski McDougald Sulvoski Rooks Sulvoski Elam Sulvoski Elam Sulvoski
Front Entrance C. Byrd Allen C. Byrd Hayes C. Byrd J.Johnson (Hayes) Allen Hayes C. Byrd J. Johnson (Allen)
Cafe 1 administrator B. Jones B. Jones Dr. Price Dr. Price Dr. Price Dr. Price Dr. Price Dr. Price Dr. Price Dr. PriceHall between aud. and cafe Rebolledo L. Evans Elam Whaley R. Jernigan Mazzotta
Commons Administrator D. Jernigan D. Jernigan D. Jernigan D. Jernigan D. Jernigan D. Jernigan D. Jernigan PLC PLC
Roam Administrator Avery Avery Avery Avery Avery Avery PLC PLC Avery Avery
Com/Main office stairs Dewey Stevens G. Bell Simmons Whitely Micke D. Bell C. McLamb K. Medlin A. Cox
Com CTE Happer M. Jones C. Adams Austin D. Jernigan Elam Strickland D.Medlin Roley's sub Paige
FA upstairs (stairs) M. Adams M. Adams M. Adams M. Adams M. Adams M. Adams M. Adams M. Adams M. Adams M. Adams
English Hall roam Elam Lambert P. Evans Burley
Courtyard 1 Faircloth Pigford K. Parker J. Cox Lusk Parnell Aycock Lindsay J. Byrd Canavin
Courtyard 2 Rowland Brewington A. Massengill Lusk Marbry Simmons Marbry Stanforth/ACT Simmons Parnell
Courtyard 3 G. Tart G. Tart G.Tart G.Tart G. Tart G. Tart G. Tart G. Tart G. Tart G. Tart
Fish Tanks R. Jernigan Rooks R. Jernigan Rooks McDougald R. Jernigan Rooks McDougald Rooks
Old Gym Lobby Front Honeycutt McFarland S. Tart Hodges Williams T. Barefoot McDougald Williams Barnes A. Johnson
Computer Lab 2101 Smith Smith Smith Smith Smith Smith Smith Smith Smith Smith
ATTENDANCE: AccountabilityTeacher: Grohowski
Three Week Total 40 9 Week Total 75Course: Math I
9-week total
1/22/15-2/11/15 Note: Type a "1" if student is in attendance.
3 wk total
Student Name Grade 1/22 1/23 1/26 1/27 1/28 1/29 1/30 2/2 2/3 2/4 2/5 2/6 2/9 2/10 2/11
Alvarez 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
Atkinson 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Avila-Castaneda 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
Baker 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barnes 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Butler 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Creech 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Cropper 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Ellis 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
Fraire-Cruz 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 4
Godwin 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Harmon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONTACT INFO
Please feel free to contact me if I can be of further assistance:
Eddie Price – [email protected]
SOUTH JOHNSTON HIGH SCHOOL
FOUR OAKS, NC
919-894-3146
http://sjhs.johnston.k12.nc.us