4-Volume Set

Politics ofModernSoutheast AsiaCRITICAL ISSUES IN MODERN POLITICS

Edited and with a new introduction by Allen Hicken, University ofMichigan, USA

Southeast Asia offers a rich tapestry of comparatively under-studied countries thatshed light on political dynamics and political economy within developing states.Some countries manage rapid economic development while others do not;Southeast Asia is home to some of the fastest growing economies in the last fortyyears (e.g. Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and later Indonesia) alongside economicbasket cases (e.g. Burma) and chronic under-performers (e.g. the Philippines).

In addition, there are abundant examples of political transitions to or fromdemocracy to be found in the region, along with countries that seem to functionstably somewhere between democracy and autocracy. (Indonesia’s experiment withdemocracy is a critical case study in the compatibility of Islam with democracy.)

This new four-volume collection from Routledge represents a unique compilation ofthe best work on modern Southeast Asian politics, and as such will be an invaluableresource for students and instructors interested in the region. It will also appeal tothose interested in the politics of the developing world more generally and who arelooking to the experiences of the countries that form Southeast Asia for invaluablecase studies that resonate in a wider political and economic context.

Routledge Major Works

RoutledgeApril 2010234x156: 1,600ppSet Hb: 978-0-415-45061-4

1. Andrew MacIntyre, ‘Business, Government and Development:Northeast and Southeast Asian Comparisons’, in A. MacIntyre (ed.),Business and Government in Industrializing Asia (Cornell UniversityPress, 1994), pp. 1–28.

2. Paul Hutchcroft, ‘Patrimonial States and Rent Capitalism: ThePhilippines in Comparative Perspectives’, Booty Capitalism (CornellUniversity Press, 1988), pp. 45–64.

3. Donald K. Crone, ‘States, Social Elites, and Government Capacity inSoutheast Asia’, World Politics, 1988, 40, 2, 252–68.

4. James C. Scott, ‘Patron–Client Politics and Political Change inSoutheast Asia’, American Political Science Review, 1972, 66, 1, 91–113.

5. David Kang, ‘Transaction Costs and Crony Capitalism in East Asia’,Comparative Politics, 2003, 35, 4, 439–58.

6. Linda Y. C. Lim and Aaron Stern, ‘State Power and Private Profit: ThePolitical Economy of Corruption in Southeast Asia’, Asian-PacificEconomic Literature, 2002, 16, 2, 18–52.

7. Anek Laothamatas, ‘Business and Politics in Thailand: New Patterns ofInfluence’, Asian Survey, 1988, 28, 4, 451–70.

8. Duncan McCargo, ‘Network Monarchy and Legitimacy Crises inThailand’, The Pacific Review, 2005, 18, 4, 499–519.

9. Michael K. Connors, ‘Political Reform and the State in Thailand: NewPatterns of Influence’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 1999, 29, 2,202–26.

10. John Sidel, ‘Bossism and State Formation in the Philippines’, Capital,Coercion and Crime: Bossism in the Philippines (Stanford UniversityPress, 1999), pp. 1–22.

11. Paul D. Hutchcroft, ‘Colonial Masters, National Politicos, andProvincial Lords: Central Authority and Local Autonomy in theAmerican Philippines’, Journal of Asian Studies, 2000, 59, 2, 277–306.

12. Natasha Hamilton-Hart, ‘The Singapore State Revisited’, Pacific Review,2000, 13, 2, 195–216.

13. Teri Lynn Caraway, ‘Protective Repression, International Pressure, andInstitutional Design: Explaining Labor Reform in Indonesia’, Studies inComparative International Development, 2004, 39, 1, 28–49.

14. Edmund Malesky, ‘Straight Ahead on Red: How Foreign DirectInvestment Empowers Subnational Leaders’, Journal of Politics, 2008,70, 1, 97–119.

15. M. Gainsborough, ‘Corruption and the Politics of Decentralization inVietnam’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 2003, 33, 1, 69–84.

16. Edward Aspinall, ‘The Construction of Grievance: Natural Resourcesand Identity in a Separatist Conflict’, Journal of Conflict Resolution,2007, 51, 6, 950–72.

17. Gary Hawes, ‘Theories of Peasant Revolution: A Critique andContribution from the Philippines’, World Politics, 1990, 42, 2,261–98.

18. Garry Rodan, ‘Civil Society and Other Political Possibilities inSoutheast Asia’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 1997, 27, 2, 156–78.

19. M. L. Weiss, ‘What Will Become of Reformasi? Ethnicity and ChangingPolitical Norms in Malaysia’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 1999, 21, 3,424–50.

20. David M. Jones, ‘Democratization, Civil Society, and Illiberal MiddleClass Culture in Pacific Asia’, Comparative Politics, 1998, 30, 2, 147–69.

21. Jacques Bertrand, ‘Ethnic Conflicts in Indonesia: National Models,Critical Junctures and the Timing of Violence’, Journal of East AsianStudies, 2008, 8, 3, 425–49.

22. Charles Hirschman, ‘The Making of Race in Colonial Malaya: PoliticalEconomy and Racial Ideology’, Sociological Forum, 1986, 1, 2, 330–61.

23. Robert T. Taylor, ‘Perceptions of Ethnicity in the Politics of Burma’,Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 1982, 10, 1, 7–20.

24. Charles F. Keyes, ‘Buddhism and National Integration in Thailand’,Journal of Asian Studies, 1971, 30, 3, 551–68.

25. Robert W. Hefner, ‘Democratization in an Age of ReligiousRevitalization’, Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia(Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 3–20.

26. Kikue Hamayotsu, ‘Islam and Nation Building in Southeast Asia:Malaysia and Indonesia in Comparative Perspective’, Pacific Affairs,2002, 75, 3, 353–75.

27. Farish A. Noor, ‘Blood, Sweat, and Jihad: The Radicalization of thePolitical Discourse of the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS) from1982 Onwards’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 2003, 25, 2, 200-32.

28. Martin Van Bruinessen, ‘Genealogies of Islamic Radicalism in Post-Suharto Indonesia’, South East Asia Research, 2002, 10, 2, 117–54.

29. Syed Serajul Islam, ‘The Islamic Independence Movements in Patani ofThailand and Mindanao of the Philippines’, Asian Survey, 1998, 38, 5,441–56.

30. Joseph Chinyong Liow, ‘International Jihad and Muslim Radicalism inThailand? Toward an Alternative Interpretation’, Asia Policy, 2006, 2,89–108.

VOLUME I VOLUME II

Politics of Modern Southeast Asia CRITICAL ISSU

Routledge Major Works

31. John T. Sidel, ‘Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy Revisited:Colonial State and Chinese Immigrant in the Making of ModernSoutheast Asia’, Comparative Politics, 2008, 40, 2, 127–47.

32. Donald K. Emmerson, ‘Region and Recalcitrance: RethinkingDemocracy Through Southeast Asia’, The Pacific Review, 1995, 8, 2,223–48.

33. J. Bertrand, ‘Growth and Democracy in Southeast Asia’, ComparativePolitics, 1998, 30, 3, 355–75.

34. William Case, ‘Can the “Halfway House” Stand? Semidemocracy andElite Theory in Three Southeast Asian Countries’, Comparative Politics,1996, 28, 4, 437–64.

35. Benjamin Smith, ‘Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdownand Persistence Under Single-Party Rule’, World Politics, 2005, 57, 3,421–51.

36. Dan Slater, ‘Iron Cage in an Iron Fist: Authoritarian Institutions andthe Personalization of Power in Malaysia’, Comparative Politics, 2003,36, 1, 81–101.

37. James Jesudason, ‘Syncretic State and the Structuring of OppositionalPolitics in Malaysia’, in Garry Rodan (ed.), Political Oppositions inIndustrializing Asia (Routledge, 1996), pp. 128–60.

38. Benedict Anderson, ‘Murder and Progress in Modern Siam’, New LeftReview, 1990, 81, 2, 33–48.

39. James Ockey, ‘Political Parties, Factions, and Corruption in Thailand’,Modern Asian Studies, 1994, 28, 2, 251–77.

40. Pasuk Phongpaichit and Chris Baker, ‘Thaksin’s Populism’, Journal ofContemporary Asia, 2008, 38, 1, 62–83.

41. Kevin Hewison, ‘Crafting Thailand’s New Social Contract’, The PacificReview, 2004, 17, 4, 503–22.

42. Allen Hicken, ‘Party Fabrication: Constitutional Reform and the Riseof Thai Rak Thai’, Journal of East Asian Studies, 2006, 6, 3, 381–408.

43. Benedict Anderson, ‘Cacique Democracy in the Philippines: Originsand Dreams’, New Left Review, 1998, 1, 169, 3–33.

44. Paul D. Hutchcroft and Joel Rocamora, ‘Strong Demands and WeakInstitutions: The Origins and Evolution of the Democratic Deficit inthe Philippines’, Journal of East Asia Studies, 2003, 4, 3, 259–92.

45. Mark R. Thompson, ‘Off the Endangered List: PhilippineDemocratization in Comparative Perspective’, Comparative Politics,1996, 28, 2, 128–60.

46. Harold Crouch, ‘Patrimonialism and Military Rule in Indonesia’,World Politics, 1979, 31, 4, 571–87.

47. William Liddle, ‘Suharto’s Indonesia: Personal Rule and PoliticalInstitutions’, Pacific Affairs, 1985, 58, 1, 68–90.

48. Dwight Y. King, ‘Social Influences on 1999 Voting Choices’, Half-Hearted Reform: Electoral Institutions and the Struggle for Democracy inIndonesia (Praeger, 2003), pp. 141–66.

49. William Liddle and Saiful Mujani, ‘Leadership, Party and Religion:Explaining Voting Behavior in Indonesia’, Comparative Political Studies,2007, 40, 7, 832–57.

50. Richard Doner, ‘Approaches to the Politics of Economic Growth inSoutheast Asia’, Journal of Asian Studies, 1991, 50, 4, 81–122.

51. Richard F. Doner, Bryan K. Ritchie, and Dan Slater, ‘SystematicVulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States: Northeast andSoutheast Asia in Comparative Perspective’, International Organization,2005, 59, 2, 327–61.

52. Hal Hill, ‘Towards a Political Economy Explanation of Rapid Growthin ASEAN: A Survey and Analysis’, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 1997, 14,2, 131–49.

53. K. S. Jomo, ‘Rethinking the Role of Government Policy in SoutheastAsia’, in J. E. Stiglitz and S. Yusuf (eds.), Rethinking the Asian Miracle(Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 461–508.

54. R. McVey, ‘The Materialization of the Southeast Asian Entrepreneur’, inRuth McVey (ed.), Southeast Asian Capitalists (Cornell University,1992), pp. 7–34.

55. Yoshihara Kunio, ‘Industrialization Without Development’, The Rise ofErsatz Capitalism in South-East Asia (Oxford University Press, 1988), pp.99–121.

56. Paul Krugman, ‘The Myth of Asia’s Miracle’, Foreign Affairs, 1994, 73,6, 62–78.

57. Andrew MacIntyre, ‘Institutions and Investors: The Politics of theAsian Economic Crisis’, International Organization, 2001, 55, 1, 81–122.

58. W. G. Huff, ‘Singapore’s Economic Development: Four Lessons andSome Doubts’, Oxford Development Studies, 1999, 27, 1, 33–55.

59. John Wong, ‘Why Has Myanmar Not Developed Like East Asia?’,ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 1997, 13, 3, 344–58.

60. Hal Hill, ‘Indonesia’s Industrial Policy and Performance: “Orthodoxy”Vindicated’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1996, 45, 1,147–74.

61. Michael T. Rock, ‘Reassessing the Effectiveness of Industrial Policy inIndonesia: Can the Neoliberals be Wrong?’, World Development, 1999,27, 4, 691–704.

62. Richard Stubbs, ‘War and Economic Development: Export-OrientedIndustrialization in East and Southeast Asia’, Comparative Politics,2002, 31, 3, 337–55.

63. Richard Stubbs, ‘ASEAN Plus Three: Emerging East AsianRegionalism?’, Asian Survey, 2002, 42, 3, 440–5.

64. Jurgen Ruland, ‘ASEAN and the Asian Crisis: Theoretical Implicationsand Practical Consequences for Southeast Asian Regionalism’, ThePacific Review, 2000, 13, 3, 421–51.

VOLUME III VOLUME IV

UES IN MODERN POLITICS

MJWK0904