1
Download the poster windeurope.org/summit2016 #windeuropesummit2016 Ever increasing marine construction and human activities within the European seas necessitates more judicious planning in the use of ocean space. This planning must consider the multi-use of ocean space in order to minimize the environmental impacts. Going offshore: combining renewable energy and food production provides us with both substantial clean energy and high quality seafood while minimizing the individual environmental impacts of both industries. This study will focus on the risks and opportunities of both co-location and MUP (Multi-use platform) scenarios: in total six commercial projects from the offshore project developers’ portfolio (both EU and non-EU). In addition, new opportunities for future co-location and MUP commercial development are outlined according to the prospective work combining both European Blue Growth goals and the offshore project developers’ long-term project portfolio. Going offshore: Combining renewable energy and food production! Wei He and Hanne Wigum Statoil Petroleum AS, Bergen, Norway PO.317 Abstract Overview of the “Crowded sea” Accelerate the movement of aquaculture to offshore sites Risk assessment and Summary European seas will be subject to massive development of marine infrastructures in the near future. Fig. 1 shows the overview of the “Crowded sea”. The offshore activities are divided into five categories as follows. •The installation of 150 GW capacity of offshore wind farm before 2030 •The fast growth of offshore industries including fishing, dredging, oil/gas, construction of artificial reef and island, and mining •Transportation including public, tourism and the transportation related to offshore industries •Network infrastructure related to Radar for automation, cables and pipelines •Protected areas including birds, marine life and cultural heritage Both co-location and MUP have great new opportunities to promote European Blue Growth goals for the “Crowded sea”. However, there are both technological and non-technological barriers that can hinder both co-location and MUP. Offshore Nearshore 1. Offshore energy production: 10 GW in2016 & 150 GW in 2030 New opportunities of co-location & MUP Nearshore 2. Offshore industry: Fishing Dredging Oil/gas Aquaculture Artificial reef Offshore island Mining 5. Protected areas: Birds Marine life Cultural heritage 3. Transportation: Including tourism Related to 1 & 2 4. Network infrastructure: Radar for automation Cables Pipelines Offshore Marine space Fig. 1. New opportunities of co-location and MUP Statoil has successfully applied its 45 years of world leading offshore oil and gas platform experience to offshore wind farm development. Utilizing both the platform and offshore wind experience has the potential to overcome technology bottlenecks in order to accelerate the movement of aquaculture to offshore sites. The risk assessment aims at showing both the real and perceived challenges which so far have blocked the development of commercial offshore projects. The risks are assessed in four project phases: i) Pre-project (including licenses, feasibility and investment decision), ii) Commission, iii) Operation and Maintenance (O&M), and iv) Decommission. Six co-location and MUP commercial projects (four in the EU and two outside the EU) listed in the table below have been selected to give insights into the real barriers and risks encountered globally. Since the offshore projects involve high technology, high investment and high risks, most developments are stopped during the pre-project phase. Accordingly, the experiences and lessons learned from both EU and non-EU commercial projects at the pre-project phase are focused on. CO-location/MUP-Sites Project phase Experiences/lessons Two offshore wind farms in the UK Offshore (20 km and 32 km, respectively) One in operation; one in the commission phase; Co- location/MUP not implemented The stakeholders are not willing take new risks from Co-location/MUP; The risks related to the aquaculture technology at the site; no financial supports for the Co-location/MUP. Large offshore wind farm in UK, Marine space: 8600 km 2 (125 to 175 km) In pre-project phase (difficult to reach full investment decision) Co-location/MUP will increase the total yield and has the potential to improve the economics; The implementation bottlenecks are the maturity of the aquaculture technology at the site and financial supports for combining both wind and aquaculture sectors Floating wind turbine supplies power to oil/gas platform in Norwegian sea, Marine space (100 km) In pre-project phase (near full investment decision) Proposed in 2006; The investment decision was postponed for 10 years due to the maturity of the floating wind turbine technology and the emission reduction benefits. Dafeng offshore wind farm combing with aquaculture farm in China: 2*150MW, Nearshore In operation phase The Co-location (150 MW wind and aquaculture at small scale) is in operation. Feedbacks from the stakeholders are excellent; Co-location and MUP are included in the design of the second 150 MW offshore wind farm. Floating offshore farm combing wind and aquaculture in Japan, Nearshore In pre-project phase The stakeholders requested the Co-location/MUP; The low risk aquaculture activities based on the local traditions were implanted in the feasibility study. Summary: Applying offshore wind technology to offshore aquaculture: 1) Achieve aquaculture technology breakthroughs, and 2) Exploring the synergy amongst offshore wind farms & aquaculture: i) Turn the conflicts into co-operation; increase yield; offshore electricity user, and ii) Joint technology development. [Ref. 1] W. He, R. Yttervik, G. P. Olsen, and I. Ostvik, A case study of 1000 MW offshore wind farm with aquaculture farm, Poster nr. 616, EWEA 2013, Vienna, Austria, February 4 th to 7 th , 2013. [Ref. 2] Wei He, Jacket-Cage: Dual-Use the Jacket Foundation of Offshore Wind Turbine for Aquaculture Farming, Wind Engineering , 39 (3), pages:311-320, 2015. Offshore oil and gas platform Offshore wind turbine Offshore fish farming cages

PO.317 Going offshore: Combining renewable energy and …•The installation of 150 GW capacity of offshore wind farm before 2030 •The fast growth of offshore industries including

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PO.317 Going offshore: Combining renewable energy and …•The installation of 150 GW capacity of offshore wind farm before 2030 •The fast growth of offshore industries including

Downloadtheposter

windeurope.org/summit2016#windeuropesummit2016

EverincreasingmarineconstructionandhumanactivitieswithintheEuropeanseasnecessitatesmorejudiciousplanninginthe useofoceanspace.Thisplanningmustconsiderthemulti-useofoceanspaceinordertominimizetheenvironmentalimpacts.Goingoffshore:combiningrenewable energyandfoodproductionprovidesuswithbothsubstantialcleanenergyandhighqualityseafoodwhileminimizingtheindividualenvironmentalimpacts of bothindustries.Thisstudywillfocusontherisksandopportunitiesofbothco-locationandMUP(Multi-useplatform)scenarios:intotalsixcommercialprojectsfrom theoffshoreprojectdevelopers’portfolio(bothEUandnon-EU).Inaddition,newopportunitiesforfutureco-locationandMUPcommercialdevelopmentareoutlinedaccordingtotheprospectiveworkcombiningbothEuropeanBlueGrowthgoalsandtheoffshoreprojectdevelopers’long-termprojectportfolio.

Goingoffshore:Combiningrenewableenergyandfoodproduction!WeiHeandHanneWigum

StatoilPetroleumAS,Bergen,Norway

PO.317

Abstract

Overviewofthe “Crowdedsea”

Acceleratethemovementofaquaculturetooffshoresites

Riskassessment andSummary

Europeanseaswillbesubjecttomassivedevelopmentofmarineinfrastructuresinthenearfuture.Fig.1showstheoverviewofthe “Crowdedsea”.Theoffshoreactivitiesaredividedintofivecategoriesasfollows.•Theinstallationof150GWcapacityofoffshorewindfarmbefore2030•Thefastgrowthofoffshoreindustriesincludingfishing,dredging,oil/gas,constructionofartificialreefandisland,andmining•Transportationincludingpublic,tourismandthetransportationrelatedtooffshoreindustries•NetworkinfrastructurerelatedtoRadarforautomation,cablesandpipelines•Protectedareasincludingbirds,marinelifeandculturalheritage

Bothco-locationandMUPhavegreatnewopportunitiestopromoteEuropeanBlueGrowthgoalsforthe“Crowdedsea”.However,therearebothtechnologicalandnon-technologicalbarriersthatcanhinderbothco-locationandMUP.

OffshoreNearshore

1. Offshoreenergyproduction:10GWin2016&150GWin2030

Newopportunitiesofco-location

&MUP

Nearshore

2.Offshoreindustry:FishingDredgingOil/gasAquacultureArtificialreefOffshoreislandMining

5.Protectedareas:Birds

MarinelifeCulturalheritage

3.Transportation:IncludingtourismRelatedto1&2

4.Networkinfrastructure:RadarforautomationCablesPipelines

OffshoreMarinespace

Fig.1.Newopportunitiesofco-locationandMUP

Statoilhassuccessfullyappliedits45yearsofworldleadingoffshoreoilandgasplatformexperiencetooffshorewindfarm development.Utilizingboththeplatformandoffshorewindexperiencehasthepotentialtoovercometechnologybottlenecksinordertoacceleratethemovementofaquaculturetooffshoresites.

Theriskassessment aimsatshowingboththerealandperceivedchallengeswhichsofarhaveblockedthedevelopmentofcommercialoffshoreprojects.Therisksareassessedinfourprojectphases:i)Pre-project(includinglicenses,feasibilityandinvestmentdecision),ii)Commission,iii)OperationandMaintenance(O&M),and iv)Decommission.Sixco-locationandMUPcommercialprojects(fourintheEUandtwooutsidetheEU)listedinthetablebelowhavebeenselectedtogiveinsightsintotherealbarriersandrisksencounteredglobally.Sincetheoffshoreprojectsinvolvehightechnology,highinvestmentandhighrisks,mostdevelopmentsarestoppedduringthepre-projectphase.Accordingly,theexperiencesandlessonslearnedfrombothEUandnon-EUcommercialprojectsatthepre-projectphase arefocusedon.

CO-location/MUP-Sites Project phase Experiences/lessonsTwooffshorewindfarmsintheUKOffshore(20kmand32km,respectively)

Oneinoperation;oneinthecommissionphase;Co-location/MUPnotimplemented

The stakeholders are not willing take new risks from Co-location/MUP; The risks related tothe aquaculture technology at the site; no financial supports for the Co-location/MUP.

LargeoffshorewindfarminUK,Marinespace:8600km2 (125to175km)

Inpre-projectphase(difficulttoreachfullinvestmentdecision)

Co-location/MUP will increase the total yield and has the potential to improve theeconomics; The implementation bottlenecks are the maturity of the aquaculture technologyat the site and financial supports for combining both wind and aquaculture sectors

Floatingwindturbinesuppliespowertooil/gasplatforminNorwegiansea,Marinespace(100km)

Inpre-projectphase(nearfullinvestmentdecision)

Proposed in 2006; The investment decision was postponed for 10 years due to the maturityof the floating wind turbine technology and the emission reduction benefits.

Dafengoffshorewindfarmcombingwithaquaculture farminChina:2*150MW,Nearshore

Inoperationphase The Co-location (150 MW wind and aquaculture at small scale) is in operation. Feedbacksfrom the stakeholders are excellent; Co-location and MUP are included in the design of thesecond 150 MW offshorewind farm.

Floatingoffshorefarmcombingwindandaquaculture inJapan,Nearshore

Inpre-projectphase The stakeholders requested the Co-location/MUP; The low risk aquaculture activities basedon the local traditions were implanted in the feasibility study.

Summary:Applyingoffshorewindtechnologytooffshoreaquaculture:1)Achieveaquaculturetechnologybreakthroughs,and2)Exploringthesynergyamongstoffshorewindfarms&aquaculture:i)Turntheconflictsintoco-operation;increaseyield;offshoreelectricityuser,andii)Jointtechnologydevelopment.

[Ref.1]W.He,R.Yttervik,G.P.Olsen,andI.Ostvik,Acasestudyof1000MWoffshorewindfarmwithaquaculturefarm,Posternr.616,EWEA2013,Vienna,Austria,February4th to7th,2013.[Ref.2]WeiHe,Jacket-Cage:Dual-UsetheJacketFoundationofOffshoreWindTurbineforAquacultureFarming,WindEngineering,39(3),pages:311-320,2015.

Offshoreoilandgasplatform Offshorewindturbine Offshorefishfarmingcages