Upload
harvey-hall
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PLMLCLeadership Series
Thunder Bay RegionDay 3
Brian Harrison, YRDSB
Connie Quadrini, YCDSB
Wednesday April 20th, 2011
Create a Graph!
• Individually, create a circle graph representing the percentage of time you have spent on each of the 5 Core Leadership Capacities in Mathematics between days 2 and 3. – Setting Goals– Using Data– Aligning Resources with Priorities– Fostering Collaborative Learning
Cultures– Engaging in Courageous
Conversations
Create a Graph!
• Once you have completed your circle graph…– pair up with a colleague from
another district– share your graph– describe the actions and
interactions that account for the slices of your pie.
Series Learning Goal
• to synthesize and apply the 5 Core Capacities of Effective Leadership and Shared Leadership to improve mathematics instruction
Interactive Session Activities
• Engage in collaborative reflection to inform next ‘plan’ stage of Mathematics Leadership Learning Cycle
• Create an effective professional learning plan based on current and/or future BIPSA, professional learning essentials and the 5 Core Leadership Capacities
How is Math different from Literacy?Classroom• Mathematical Processes are the actions of doing math• overall expectations change from grade to grade• key concepts are developmental and sequentially built• “Gradual release” (modeled, shared, guided, independent) is not
the focus• students develop problem solving skills as they learn and apply
mathematics concepts• differentiated instruction strategies support students in accessing
mathematics• meaningful mathematical discourse creates a community of
learners
How is Math different from Literacy?
Professional Learning• content knowledge development is critical for teachers of
all grades• time needs to be spent discussing anticipated student
responses and teacher responses outside of the classroom
• practice in the refinement of effective questioning strategies supports differentiated learning for students
• facilitators must possess strong knowledge for math teaching, in particular content and pedagogical content knowledge
Designing an Effective Mathematics Professional Learning Plan
The Working Table on Teacher Development recommended the adoption of the following five characteristics:
i) coherent
ii) attentive to adult learning styles
iii) goal-oriented
iv) sustainable
v) evidence-informed
Professional Learning Essentials
• Read BLM 3.2– Excerpts from: Report to the Partnership Table
on Teacher Professional Learning: Recommendations of the Working Table of Teacher Development, May 2007
• With a partner, share…– 1 affirmation– 1 revelation
Professional Learning Cycle Summary
The professional learning cycle:– serves as a process for
professional learning– Is driven by student
learning/engagement needs– can align educator learning and
action with planning at all levels; e.g., classroom, department, school, cross-panel, board
11
SS/L-18ITEB 2010 The Professional Learning Cycle 1313
Student learning Student learning need focuses need focuses educator educator learninglearning
Using DataSetting Goals
Aligning Resources with PrioritiesFostering Collaborative Learning CulturesEngaging in Courageous Conversations
PLAN(Grade 9 Applied Focus)
• student student learning needlearning need
• educator educator learninglearning
• principal envisions a change principal envisions a change – independent practices to teacher collaboration independent practices to teacher collaboration
• goal is to achieve greater consistency in A for/as/of L goal is to achieve greater consistency in A for/as/of L – co-marking/co-assessmentco-marking/co-assessment
– mathematics department head involvementmathematics department head involvement
• Analysis of potential reasons for Grade 9 credit Analysis of potential reasons for Grade 9 credit accumulation data in Applied math accumulation data in Applied math
– notice the gaps in achievement in gender, special needs and notice the gaps in achievement in gender, special needs and ELLsELLs
• led by the principal. the team brings test samples or led by the principal. the team brings test samples or final exams (with student answers) final exams (with student answers)
– review and diagnosis of areas of challengereview and diagnosis of areas of challenge
SS/L-18ITEB 2010 The Professional Learning Cycle15
Implementing Implementing strategies to meet strategies to meet student needsstudent needs
Using DataAligning Resources with Priorities
Fostering Collaborative Learning CulturesEngaging in Courageous Conversations
ACT(Grade 9 Applied Example)
• Implementing Implementing strategies to strategies to meet student meet student needsneeds
• teachers compare and analyze tests for teachers compare and analyze tests for content and marking scales/rubriccontent and marking scales/rubric– student answers are also analyzedstudent answers are also analyzed– department head facilitates building a common department head facilitates building a common
rubric rubric
• the principal maps out connections to the the principal maps out connections to the curriculum expectations curriculum expectations – teachers recognize ambiguity in marking / A&E teachers recognize ambiguity in marking / A&E
practices; practices; – teachers begin to identify a need for co-teachers begin to identify a need for co-
marking for consistency marking for consistency – (principal senses that eventually this would (principal senses that eventually this would
lead to discussion on teacher practices)lead to discussion on teacher practices)
SS/L-18ITEB 2010 The Professional Learning Cycle
OBSERVE
17
Sharing Sharing instructional instructional practice to monitor practice to monitor student learning student learning and enhance and enhance educator learningeducator learning
17
Using DataSetting Goals
Aligning Resources with PrioritiesFostering Collaborative Learning
CulturesEngaging in Courageous Conversations
OBSERVE(Grade 9 Applied Example)
• Sharing Sharing instructional instructional practice to practice to monitor monitor student student learning and learning and enhance enhance educator educator learninglearning
Share and analyse:Share and analyse:• teachers agree to co-plan and administer a
test for the next unit followed by a re-examination of student work
• principal and department head observe a broad spectrum of teacher understanding in effective A&E practices
– they consult with board consultant, coach and other principal colleagues who have experienced increased student achievement in math;
– it is agreed that some support on A&E is necessary
SS/L-18ITEB 2010 The Professional Learning Cycle
REFLECT
19
Examining Examining evidence to reflect evidence to reflect
on student and on student and educator learningeducator learning
Using DataSetting Goals
Engaging in Courageous Conversations
REFLECT(Grade 9 Applied Example)
• Examining Examining evidence to evidence to reflect on student reflect on student and educator and educator learninglearning
Examine, analyse:Examine, analyse:• consultation with coach identifies consultation with coach identifies
opportunities for principal and opportunities for principal and department head professional learningdepartment head professional learning– facilitation skills to support co-marking facilitation skills to support co-marking
• teacher reflection also demonstrates a teacher reflection also demonstrates a need for further understanding of AforL need for further understanding of AforL as a foundation to effective AofLas a foundation to effective AofL
• plan next steps to continue the cycle of plan next steps to continue the cycle of learninglearning
SS/L-18ITEB 2010 The Professional Learning Cycle20
Reflection
“Reflection is the process of stepping back from an experience to ponder, carefully and persistently. Learning is the creation of meaning from past or current events that serves as a guide for future behavior.”
Wood-Daudelin,1996. Learning from experience through reflection.
23
“House” RoundsDistrict Pairs Rounds (15 minutes per district pair)1. District pairs presents a ‘case’ to the team – describing
the nature of the problem/the focus for their “plan” and “act”
2. Team asks clarifying questions for the presenter3. The team offers suggestions for consideration,
reflections, connections…4. Presenter has the final word – offers observations and
reflections on what has been discussed
• Whole Group Share
24
Reflection
“Reflection attempts to answer the question of ‘where we are now’. Reflection combined with strategic thinking attempts to answer the question of ‘where we could be’.”
Davies & Davies, 2010. The nature and dimension of strategic leadership.
25
26
School(School Improvement Plan)
Classroom(planning for teaching and learning)
DA
TA
/ E
VID
EN
CE
-BA
SE
D
DA
TA
/ E
VID
EN
CE
-BA
SE
D
Board(Board Improvement Plan)
AL
IGN
ED
AL
IGN
ED
Making the Connection
Exploring Sample BIPSA’s
• Using BLM 3.3, work with your district partner to analyze the 3 BIPSA samples
• Identify…– 1 plus – 1 minus– 1 interesting
• Whole Group Share
Designing an Effective Mathematics Professional Learning Plan
Work with your district partner to• Design / refine an effective professional learning
plan to support your BIPSA. • Use the following resources to guide your
reflection and planning:– BLM 3.2 & 3.4 – Conversation Starters package
Designing an Effective Professional Learning Plan
Form a group of 4 • District pairs share their professional learning
plan and identify how you integrated…– Professional learning essentials (BLM 3.2)– 5 Core Capacities
Next Steps
• Math CAMPPP 2011– August 15th – 19th
– Kempenfelt Conference Centre, Barrie– http://www.edugains.ca/newsite/math2/index.html
• PLMLC 2011-12 – TBD
• Board collaboration – Give one, get one
Thank You!
• Brian Harrison, [email protected]
• Connie Quadrini, [email protected]
• http://gains-camppp.wikispaces.com/PLMLC+Leadership