8
Planned Communities: Design Process, Implementation and Value Rebecca L. McKevitz May 1, 2013 Carla Corbin LA 221

Planned Communities: Design Process, Implementation and Value

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Planned Communities: Design Process, Implementation and Value

Planned Communities: Design Process,

Implementation and Value

Rebecca L. McKevitz

May 1, 2013

Carla Corbin

LA 221

Page 2: Planned Communities: Design Process, Implementation and Value

Planned Cities and Communities

Although no city or community large or small can be built without first being planned, the

definition of a planned city is typically when a community is constructed in an area that was previously

undeveloped (Simonds). These planned cities contrast other places that may have instead been re-

designed or evolved over time. Essentially, planned cities and communities involve starting from

scratch. Planners must work to carefully design the city to look, feel and function the way they see fit.

Depending on scale, location and the culture of the area, these communities are carefully looked at and

planners attempt to put together a successful and meaningful design (Simonds).

Another term also commonly associated with planned communities is garden cities or

greenbelt cities. These places usually include large amounts of public green space. The green areas in

the city can be implemented in a multitude of ways including large individual lots, public parks, gardens

and greenways. A more subtle way of planning for adequate green space is by setting houses back

away from the street and creating a “green belt” effect along suburban streets, which can be seen in

Riverside, Illinois. The benefits to this emphasis on public or private green space is that these areas are

then more environmentally friendly and aesthetically pleasing, but also give residents a more

comfortable place to live, work and spend time (Simonds).

The environment of a community is something that must be considered not only when

individuals are looking for a place in which to live, but also when analyzing whether or not the design of

this place is successful. A successful community environment must not only provide the physical needs

of the people, but also the visual or aesthetic, social, cultural, educational, recreational and inspirational

amenities (Simonds). It is also important to understand that these amenities not only need to be

implemented in the design, but they need to be readily available and easily accessible for community

members (Simonds).

Savannah

1733 was the year that James Oglethorpe laid out the plan for his new colonial city. Though he

was born 30 years after the Great Fire of 1666 in London, the remains of the disaster were still evident

and rebuilding was still underway. By this time, the city had completely changed and many great

estates were being divided into city blocks and parks. London, at this time, was not only looking

forward to what the rebuilding of the city could be, but also reflecting and improving upon earlier

patterns. It is believed that although Oglethorpe didn’t live through the fire, he was influenced by it

(Bell).

“Although the squares of the Georgia town bear no

resemblance to those of London, and very little to those of

other cities, the question arises: did the spacious open plan of

Savannah with its parterre-like design originate with

Page 3: Planned Communities: Design Process, Implementation and Value

Oglethorpe, or was he following one that he had seen or heard

of?” (Bell)

Savannah, Georgia is credited with being America’s first planned city. Savannah is known for its

grid-type organization which proved successful for this settlement. Oglethorpe’s plan “depicted the

town of Savannah as small and well-fortified with a centrically located church; it is surrounded by a

large common for…cattle grazing; a hierarchy of

gardens, farms, villages and yeoman estates” (Wilson).

The centrally located amenities made them easily

accessible to all residents of Savannah. The grid

pattern throughout the plan created these areas of

land that are referred to as “wards”. Each ward

measures 600 feet from north to south, but can range

east to west from 540 feet to 600 feet. These wards

were organized around the center square which was

typically open public green space. The streets that

border the wards were designed to allow traffic to

flow uninterrupted. Smaller internal streets were not

as fluid and traffic moved slower and stopped more

often. This allowed for shared use of these streets by

pedestrians (Wilson).

The grid pattern also contributed to the ability for families to have large enough plots to farm

for their families. Oglethorpe believed strongly in the principle of agrarian equality. Because of this,

land was distributed “in parcel sizes appropriate for family farming” (Wilson). So not only did

Oglethorpe’s plan respond to traffic flow and pedestrian access, it also allowed for individual families to

farm on their own property in order to sustain themselves. Oglethorpe also made sure that “wooded

areas are preserved for firewood, lumber and game” (Wilson).

Another unique aspect of the design is that the squares allow for more open space than any city

layout has in history (Wilson). In fig.1 it is apparent that there are many open green squares that were

used not only for pasturing of the cattle, but the open space contributed greatly to the “health and

security of the town as well as to the convince of the inhabitants” (Wilson). This healthful open space

was one of the ways that Oglethorpe responded to his understanding of the Great Fire of 1666 and the

Great Plague in London. If the houses were spread further apart, fire would be less likely to move from

house to house, and disease would be more likely to stay confined into one residence. A more open and

spacious plan was not only more comfortable, it helped to combat issues like fire and disease.

The Oglethorpe Plan for Savannah was advanced in that it addressed many issues that were

relevant at the time. The spacious and effective grid pattern was useful for many reasons, and to this

day Oglethorpe’s plan is respected for its innovative style.

Figure 1- The grid pattern of Savannah included open public green space and a hierarchy of

roadways.

Page 4: Planned Communities: Design Process, Implementation and Value

Radburn, New Jersey

Almost two-hundred years after Oglethorpe drew up his plan for Savannah, the city of Radburn

was designed. In 1929 this development aimed to encompass the principles of the Garden City

Movement. The design for this city was laid out by Clarence Stein, Henry Wright and landscape

architect Marjorie Sewell Cautley. Soon after the Radburn was built, the attractive community setting

became a place for affluent young couples to raise children. Being away from the city was one of the big

appeals of Radburn. It was said that this was a place to come to “enjoy the amenities of life that are not

found in all suburban communities” (Schaffer).

There were a few new ideas at this time that Radburn responded to properly. As far as the first

idea that houses were “more than just places to sleep and eat”, Radburn provided conveniences like a

wide range of community services that added to the attraction of living in this area (Schaffer). Schools,

shopping centers and recreational facilities were all built

within walking distance of each home. This made life

simpler and took away the hassle of traveling far

distances for important amenities.

During this era, motor vehicles became a part of

everyday life. Because of this, plans for suburbs needed to

take into account that more people would be driving cars

on a regular basis. Radburn is a perfect example of a

community that was built in response to this movement

towards the automobile. Wright and Stien planned so

that “vehicular and pedestrian circulation were kept in

exclusive zones- the superblock spatial concept” (Pregill,

Volkman). The original plan for Radburn showed six

superblock units. Each one of these superblocks included

cul-de-sac streets that would “intersect with a secondary

road, which in turn would link with major cross-town

roads or expresssways” (Lee, Chang-Moo, Stabin-

Nesmith). Creating this system of roadways created easy

access to the major streets which would “link Radburn

residents to the larger metropolitan region” which shows

that Radburn was truly created for the motor age (Lee,

Chang-Moo, Stabin-Nesmith).

Figure 2- The pedestrian walkways are shown on the left and right sides of the map with the vehicular roadway down the

center.

Page 5: Planned Communities: Design Process, Implementation and Value

Besides the vehicular advantages of the superblock design, the movement of pedestrians

through the community was also an important issue. The designers established a “pedestrian network

that enabled residents to walk from their homes to the interior parks , the school, recreational facilities,

and the commercial centre while rarely encountering cars” (Lee, Chang-Moo, Stabin-Nesmith). This

separation of traffic from pedestrian paths (see fig.2) made Radburn a safe place for families, which was

one of its original goals.

The Woodlands, Texas

Looking towards the future, a more recent example of a successful planned community is The

Woodlands, established in 1974. This community is located approximately thirty mile north of Houston

and is set on 25,000 acres of land. Developed by businessman George Mitchell, this community was put

in place to combat urban sprawl, which is the unnecessary spreading of urban developments, and inner

urban decay, or when cities fall into disrepair. Urban sprawl has also been referred to as “megalopolis”

that is, the continuous urbanization of previously agricultural cities between cities” (Pregill, Volkman).

The Woodlands combats these issues by creating a place to live that requires minimal damage to the

original landscape, therefore minimizing the damaging environmental effects of building an urban area.

The project was led by Wallace, McHarg, Roberts and Todd who’s “diverse team consisted of

geologists, hydrologists, and design professionals” (“The Woodlands”).

The Woodlands promotes three beliefs that were kept in mind while designing the

development. All three of these goals have been sustained through time and are still instrumental in

today’s success of this property. Convenience, community and connection to nature are the reasons

The Woodlands is such an attractive place to live.

The design of the development was interesting in that it subdivided the development into

villages. Each of these villages had its own schools, places of worship, shops, parks, and greenways.

This idea is one of the many that made The Woodlands so successful. This design idea ties back to the

concept that amenities not only need to be provided for residents, they need to be readily available to

them. The concept of laying out The Woodlands into villages adds to the convenience of the

community because necessary amenities are in closer proximity to residences.

Creating a sense of community throughout the expansive acreage of The Woodlands could

prove difficult, but by creating a montage of parks and nature trails, the community spirit of The

Woodlands is alive and well. Because of this sense of community, young couples raising children seem

to be drawn to this area. The Woodlands boasts that “you’ll see families cycling along the bike trails or

walking their dogs, shopping at the local village center, picnicking and kite flying at the neighborhood

park. There’s a pleasant flurry of activity that evokes a friendly, welcoming place” (“Texas’”).

Page 6: Planned Communities: Design Process, Implementation and Value

Preservation of the dense pine woodlands that

originated on the development is another important

aspect of this design. This development is one of the

“greenest” communities in the United States with over

6,000 acres of green space which can be seen in fig.3.

There are 127 parks, seven golf courses, 198 miles of

hike and bike trails and accessible greenbelts and forest

preserves (“Texas’”). Keeping in mind the goal of

humans living in harmony with nature, the houses and

structures that were built here were designed and

placed on the site in order to preserve as much of the

woodland as possible. Another environmentally

conscious design decision made by the planners was to

utilize natural drainage systems to limit runoff.

Planning this drainage system proved cost-effective

when compared to traditional curb and gutter

drainage systems. Streets and pathways were also laid

out in a curvilinear fashion in order to respond to the

area’s natural creeks and streams. It has been said that in The Woodlands “the trees are the

overwhelming presence along major roadways, in the neighborhoods and even in the commercial

areas” (“Texas’”). As the original plan was designed and as it expanded over time, it is clear that the

conservation of this environment was carefully considered and continues to thrive today.

Comparison

Savannah, Radburn and The Woodlands, although very different in historical context and

culture, have three basic similarities in that they were all innovative in context, provided easy access to

amenities and had an emphasis on green space throughout the communities.

As stated before, Oglethorpe’s plan for Savannah followed in the footsteps of the traditional

grid patterned settlements, but Oglethorpe put an entirely new twist on his design which made it

increasingly successful. The hierarchy of roadways provided for quick travel for those who needed it,

and safer walking routes for residents. The idea of each family having their own plot on which to farm

was also a revolutionary idea and added to the ability for the settlement to sustain itself. Lastly, the

spacious plan that included public commons areas contributed to the success of farming in Savannah

and kept the plan spacious and open for comfort, safety and aesthetics.

All three of these communities accounted for the necessary amenities of their residents.

Savannah’s grid organization, the close proximity of community services in Radburn and The

Woodlands “village” concept all provided for easy access to schools, churches, food and recreation. In

Figure 3- The deep green color shows the large amount of park space, greenways and trails included in The Woodlands

plan.

Page 7: Planned Communities: Design Process, Implementation and Value

Radburn and The Woodlands especially, emphasis was put on making these developments attractive

for families. Taking the hassle out of these daily activities makes family life easier and more enjoyable.

Designing a plan that includes open green space for community use is another way these places

are related. In Savannah, the concept of the central provided space for many uses, but appreciation of

nature and creating a sense of community were two important factors. Although Radburn’s green

space looks a little different, pedestrian corridors and implementation of parks add to the amount of

green space seen in this city. The Woodlands focus even more on green space with miles of parks, bike

lanes and hiking trails and their sustainable drainage practices. The emphasis on outdoor activities and

connection to nature is stronger in The Woodlands than Savannah or Radburn, but all three plans

account for the importance of green space in a planned community.

Conclusion

The idea of planned communities has evolved over time, but in the case of Savannah, Radburn

and The Woodlands, there are many similarities. These communities have proved successful because

they were innovative, provided the necessary amenities to residents, and made it safe and enjoyable for

residents to connect with the environment and the community.

Page 8: Planned Communities: Design Process, Implementation and Value

Works Cited

"Community Information." The Woodlands Commercial Division. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Apr. 2013.

<http://www.thewoodlands-commercial.com/info_overview.html>.

Lee, Chang-Moo, and Barbara Stabin-Nesmith. "The Continuing Value Of A Planned Community:

Radburn In The Evolution Of Suburban Development." Journal Of Urban Design 6.2 (2001): 151-

184. Academic Search Premier. Web. 30 Apr. 2013.

Palmer Bell, Laura. "A New Theory on the Plan of Savannah." JSTOR 48.2 (1964): n. pag. JSTOR. Web.

29 Apr. 2013.

Pregill, Philip, and Nancy Volkman. Landscapes in history: design and planning in the Eastern and

Western traditions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley, 1999. Print.

Schaffer, Daniel. Garden cities for America: the Radburn Experience. Philadelphia: Temple University

Press, 1982. Print.

Simonds, John Ormsbee. Garden cities 21: creating a livable urban environment. New York: McGraw-

Hill, 1994. Print.

"Texas' most celebrated master-planned community." The Woodlands. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Apr. 2013.

<http://www.thewoodlands.com/>.

"The Woodlands." The Cultural Landscape Foundation | stewardship through education. N.p., n.d. Web.

30 Apr. 2013. <http://tclf.org/landscapes/woodlands-tx>.

Wilson, Thomas D.. The Oglethorpe Plan: Enlightenment Design in Savannah and Beyond. United

States of America: University of Virginia Press, 2012. Print.