Upload
kathleen-doyle
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PHILIP JOUBERT
STEWART SCOTT
Based on SAT Seminar (Pretoria)Presentations by:
• Products:Cobus Venter – GeotracGarth James – KaytechNicholas Reck – African Gabions
• Application:Mynhardt Augustyn – VKE Philip Joubert – Stewart Scott
• Analytical Techniques:Dr Fritz Jooste – Modelling & Analysis
Systems• Innovation Planning:
Joop van Wamelen – Agrément SA
BACKGROUND
Products and Purpose
Applications
Theory (Modeling)
The Road Forward
WHY GUIDELINES?
? Normally during rehabilitation action
? Grids/fabrics laid between old (distressed)
and new asphalt overlay
? To Provide Increased Resistance to:
Reflective Cracking
Fatigue Cracking (strengthen pavement)
Deformation (Rutting)
Moisture/Fines Movement
WHY REINFORCE ASPHALT?
Paving Fabrics: Geotextiles (Sealmac)
Glass Fibre Grids: Glassgrid / Glasstex
Polymer Grids: Polypropolene (AR - Grid)
Steel Grids: Wiremesh (Road Mesh)
Composites: Grid plus Fabric
PRODUCTS
PAVING FABRIC
GLASS FIBRE GRID
STEEL GRID
COMPOSITE : GRID / FABRIC
PURPOSE
Fabric Glass GridPolymer
GridSteel Grid Composite
MoistureBarrier
ReflectionCrack
FatigueCrack
Rutting
Products and Purpose
Applications
Theory (Modeling)
The Road Forward
WHY GUIDELINES?
RIGHT APPLICATION
TYPICAL APPLICATIONS
GLASS GRID FULL WIDTH
GLASS GRID FULL WIDTH
Percent Crack Reflection by length
48.4
29
21.4
7.30
20
40
60
% C
rack
ing
by
met
er
3 6 12 18 24 30 36 48 60 72
Time in Months
Fiberglass grid - long. Control - long.Fiberglass grid - trans. Control - trans.
GLASS GRID FULL WIDTH
GLASS GRID STRIPS
USE OF INTERLAYERS
GRID AND FABRIC INTERLAYER
GRID AND FABRIC INTERLAYER
GRID AND FABRIC INTERLAYER
GRID AND FABRIC INTERLAYER
CONCRETE SLABS OVERLAY
CONCRETE SLABS OVERLAY
CONCRETE SLABS OVERLAY
GLASSGRID - SETTLEMENT CRACKS
GLASSGRID - SETTLEMENT CRACKS
PAVING FABRIC
PAVING FABRIC
POTENTIAL PROBLEMS
POTENTIAL PROBLEMS
POTENTIAL PROBLEMS
Products and Purpose
Applications
Theory (Modeling)
The Road Forward
WHY GUIDELINES?
WHY MODEL?• To investigate effects of
changing pavement parameters on pavement response
• Given Effect X,
what is Strain-Y in Asphalt?
• How will asphalt perform at Strain-Y?
MICRO EFFECTS: UNCRACKED
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Offset From Load Centre (mm)
Te
ms
ile
Str
ain
(m
icro
str
ain
)
Benchmark
14,000 MPaReinforcement
10 MPa Reinforcement
MICRO EFFECTS: UNCRACKED
• Thickness and anisotropic effects distort calculated strains
• Strain unlikely to be reduced by Reinforcement UNLESS
Reinforcement considerably stiffer than Asphalt, and
there is zero slip
Micro Effects: Cracked-Behaviour
• Expert Panel / National Interest Group, • develop code of practice for Southern Africa, • follow approach Euro committee/ TRB Group, • formalise sound network management approach
• Product Performance Guarantee? • Vast potential matrix of operating conditions, • Difficult to follow this line of approach• Agrément Certification?
• Standard conformance testing• Rutting, Beam Tests, Fatigue Testing (MMLS)product approval / application type, within boundary conditions
WAY AHEAD?
-450
-400
-350
-300
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Sh
ear
Str
ain
(m
icro
stra
in)
No Reinforcement
With Reinforcement
MICRO EFFECTS: CRACKED
• Some modelling is possible using FE
• Benefits of reinforcement are more obvious for cracked scenario
BUT Anisotropic effects still important
and likely to underestimate
benefits of reinforcement
• Layered Elastic modelling not feasible
MODELLING POSSIBILITIES: SUMMARY
• Routine modelling is likely to underestimate benefits of reinforcement
• Routine modelling does not appear feasible at this stage
Key Problem:Impact on damage inhibiting and
crack retardation not evaluated at all
Products and Purpose
Case Studies
Theory (Modeling)
The Road Forward
WHY GUIDELINES?
WAY AHEAD
• Build Confidence: Focus on field performance and validation (80 %)
• Advanced modelling used mainly to identify key variables (5%)
• Improve routine models to be able to accommodate transfer functions (15%)
Y-Max BLI Case Studies
PRODUCT X: OVERLAYS > 50 MM
< 300
300 - 600
> 600
< 95
95 - 130
> 130
A,B,C
D,E
F,G,H
CASE STUDY INFORMATION
• Crack Type, Degree and Extent
• Maximum Deflection, Base Layer Index, Test Details
• Support Type and Thickness
• Traffic Volumes, Daily E80s
• Overlay and Construction Details
Base Layer Index
ME
SA
PRODUCT X: OVERLAYS > 50 MM
Already Cracked
Not Yet Cracked
Material Composition:
High tensile strength at low deformation
Shear adhesion to maintain good bond
Thermal and physically stable
No creep deformation
Recycle
REQUIREMENTS FOR GOOD PERFORMANCE
Geometry:
Sufficient cross-sectional grid area to redirect
tensile stresses (slip over existing pavement)
Mesh opening to achieve optimum shear
adhesion
Opening such to promote aggregate interlock
Strip Width beyond crack
REQUIREMENTS FOR GOOD PERFORMANCE
Constructability:
Easy placement
Remain secure during paving
Roll width
REQUIREMENTS FOR GOOD PERFORMANCE
Structurally sound (e.g. no excessive movement)
Evaluate condition (e.g. FWD, Crack Activity Meter)
First address structural problems (e.g. potholes, slab replacement)
Seal all large cracks
Pave leveling course
Overlay thickness (40mm; deeper more effective)
Tack coat (modify?)
Consider potential for slippage
Partial or full coverage (continuous = better)
DESIGN GUIDELINES
General description (e.g. glass fibre polymer covered
Tensile strength (e.g. 50, 100, 200kN/m)
Elongation at break (e.g. <5%)
Melting point (e.g. >200°C)
Mass per unit area (e.g. >300g/m2)
Storage (e.g. covered, dry, dust-free)
Pavement preparation (e.g. cracks, levelling, clean, damp)
Construction (e.g. tack, ripples, joints, roller, curves, paver/trucks)
SPECIFICATION GUIDELINES
• Boundary operating conditions • Minimum Joint Efficiency (Crack activity), • Maximum surface deflections, • Maximum vertical alignment for rutting)
• National Reinforcement Register • Identifying solution, • Anticipated outcomes, • Design criteria, • Validation approach
• Validation approach • Crack mapping, • Indices, • TMH9 equivalent approach
WAY AHEAD?