Upload
elfreda-hollie-hensley
View
234
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Justification of Punishment Backward looking –Retributive Forward looking –Detterence –Rehabilitation –Reconciliation
Citation preview
Death Penalty Trials and AppealsPertemuan 11Pertemuan 11
Matakuliah : L0472 - Psikologi ForensikTahun : Feb -2010
Justification of Punishment• Backward looking
– Retributive
• Forward looking– Detterence– Rehabilitation– Reconciliation
Detterence• Cross-sectional research• Longitudinal research
Types of Punishment• Positive punishment• Negative punishment
Side Effects of Punishment• Skinner (1938)• Boe & Church (1967)
Death Penalty, Does It Matter?• Severity, or• Immediateness and• Consistency
Capital Punishment• Link between attitude toward death penalty and
likelihood of conviction– Cannot bar person from serving on jury due to beliefs against
death penalty unless bias would result in ignoring evidence presented
– Research: pro-death penalty more likely from high status, conservative, authoritarian males
Methods of execution• Electrocution• Lethal injection• Hanging• Shooting• Beheading• Stoning
Arguments for death penalty• Deter perpetrators – would-be murderers fear being
caught• Protect society - convicted murderers prevented from
killing again• Provide justice for victim – a life for a life• Is state’s responsibility – to preserve order, to right
wrong• Is more humane than alternatives – life imprisonment is
a “living tomb”
Arguments for death penalty• “Following the prison spokesman's
announcement that Ted (Bundy) was officially dead, sounds of cheers came from the jubilant crowd and fireworks lit the sky. Shortly thereafter, a white hearse emerged from the prison gates with the remains of one of the countries most notorious serial killers. As the vehicle moved towards the crematorium, the surrounding crowd cheerfully applauded the end of a living nightmare.” From www.crimelibrary.com
Arguments against death penalty• Is barbaric – against human rights, base vengeance,
state-sanctioned murder• Does not deter crime – no substantial proof of
decreasing crime rates• Takes innocent lives – eg. Timothy Evans, prejudice
against certain groups• Has high costs – cases time-consuming• Has no possibility of rehabilitation – extenuating
circumstances