Parametro Do RPD

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    1/24

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    2/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    NIR Light

    Electromagnetic spectrum

    2

    What is so special about the waves in NIR range?

    NIR light is absorbed by molecules containing C-H, N-H, and O-H

    groups (fats, proteins, carbohydrates, organic acids, alcohol, water)

    NIR range:750 - 2500 nm

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    3/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    Transmittance

    3

    Source Wavelength

    selector SAMPLE Detector Readout

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    4/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    Reflectance

    4

    Source

    Wavelengthselector

    SAMPLE

    Detector

    Readout

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    5/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    NIRS Instruments

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    6/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    NIRS and AOCS

    Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS)is arapid, indirect, analytical method with

    expanding use in oilseed marketing. The Soybean Quality Traits (SQT) has

    four programs to promote uniformity

    across NIRS users and platforms.

    Core sample set

    Proof of application testingStandard Calibration Method

    Proficiency (check sample) testing

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    7/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University7

    AOCS Analytical Guidelines Am 1a-09

    Near Infrared Spectroscopy InstrumentManagement and Prediction Model Development

    Main Topics

    Performance

    Sample Sets

    Lab ValuesPreprocessing

    Validation/Calibration Statistics

    Calibration Transfer/StandardizationMoisture Basis

    Correlated Y Variables

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    8/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    NIRS Calibration

    Steps required for estimation of a mathematicalrelationship between optical properties of thesample and its known chemical composition.

    8

    Spectral DataX

    Spectral DataX

    Constituent concentrationY

    (Obtained by standard wet

    chemistry methods)

    Constituent concentrationY

    (Obtained by standard wetchemistry methods)

    Regressionalgorithm

    Regression

    algorithmMathematicalrelationship

    (calibration model)

    Y= f ( X )

    Mathematicalrelationship

    (calibration model)

    Y= f ( X )

    Multiple Linear Regression (MLR)

    Principal Component Regression (PCR)

    Partial Least Squares (PLS)

    Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)

    Locally Weighted Regression (LWR)

    Support Vector Machines (SVM)

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    9/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University9

    Spectral Preprocessing- Remove noise

    - Enhance useful information

    Example using multiplicative

    scatter correction Function of derivatives

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    10/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    NIRS PredictionCalculation of composition by using spectral data(transmittance or reflectance) in calibration model

    10

    Spectral DataX

    Spectral Data

    X

    Constituent concentrationY

    Constituent concentrationY

    Mathematicalrelationship

    (calibration model)

    Y= f ( X )

    Mathematicalrelationship

    (calibration model)

    Y= f ( X )

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    11/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    NIRS Validation

    Proof that a calibration is maintaining accuracywith standard, accepted chemical methods overthe useful life of the calibration.

    11

    NEW SAMPLES Not in Calibration Population

    Spectral DataX

    Spectral DataX

    Constituent

    concentrationY

    (Obtained by standard wetchemistry methods)

    Constituent

    concentrationY

    (Obtained by standard wetchemistry methods)

    Comparison of

    calculated values toreference data

    SEP, RPD, etc

    Comparison of

    calculated values toreference data

    SEP, RPD, etc

    Mathematicalrelationship

    (calibration model)Y= f ( X )

    Mathematicalrelationship

    (calibration model)

    Y= f ( X )

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    12/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    Evaluation Statistic - RPD

    RPD Class Application

    0.02.3 Very poor Not recommended

    2.43.0 Poor Rough screening

    3.14.9 Fair Screening

    5.06.4 Good Quality control

    6.58.0 Very good Process control

    8.1+ Excellent Any application

    RPD = (Std. Dev. of Reference Data)/(Std. Error of Prediction)

    S C

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    13/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    SBM Protein Calibration

    Figure 2. Protein in soybean meal

    Calibration Cross Validation

    2006-2008 Samples

    SECV=0.65; RPD = 6.2

    Validation Set

    2009 Samples

    SEP = 0.36; RPD = 2.6

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    14/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    Sample Set Size is Important

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    15/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    Reproducibility of Reference Data

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    16/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    Reproducibility of Reference Data

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    17/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    Inter-Lab Reproducibility

    See Also: Hartwig, R.A. and Charles R. Hurburgh, Jr. 1991. Interlaboratory comparison of soybean

    protein and oil determinations. JAOCS 68(12):949-957.

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    18/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    Calibration Transfer Basic

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    19/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    Calibration Transfer Difficult

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    20/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    Moisture Basis

    Terminology Native moisture basis = moisture basis as

    developed. Choices:

    As is (at the moisture as scanned)

    Direct (Reference values adjusted to an MB)

    Reported moisture basis = moisture basis asconverted and reported (if different)

    These are all the same sample:

    35% Pro@10% M=33.8% Pro@13%M

    =38.9% Pro@ 0% M

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    21/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    Correlated Y - Amino Acids

    C l t d Y

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    22/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University22

    Correlated Y:

    Amino AcidsComparison of NIR

    calibration models

    (average r2) with

    linear regressions of

    reference amino

    acids to reference

    protein

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1.0

    LEU LYS HIS P HE AS P TYR AR G GLY ALA IS O P R O VAL THR GLU M ET S ER C YS TR Y

    CoefficientofDeterminatio

    The bes t of NIR

    calibrations

    Linear regression

    to protein

    Regression vectors

    of 18 AA PLS

    models for FOSS

    Infratec 1241 Grain

    Analyzer; most of

    the curves follow

    the same pattern,which indicates that

    calibrations predict

    one constituent.

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    23/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    Summary

    AOCS Analytical Guidelines Am 1a-09Near Infrared Spectroscopy Instrument Management and

    Prediction Model Development

    A guideline to assist in NIRS calibration efforts.

    Covers the main issues of NIRS Operation.Users need to be able to do their own calibration.

    Guidelines are not static; expect updates!

    Provide input!

  • 8/11/2019 Parametro Do RPD

    24/24

    Copyright 2010 Iowa State University

    Where To Find Us