May 2016, Volume 3, Issue 5 JETIR (ISSN-2349-5162)

JETIR1605027 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 137

Parametric Study of Various Structural System

for Lateral Load in Multi Storey Building 1Nemish V. Sanghavi,

2Sumant B. Patel,

3Y .V. Akbari

1M. E. Student, Structural Engineering Department, Darshan Institute of Engineering & Technology, Rajkot, Gujarat 2Department of civil Engineering,BVM-V.V.Nagar,Gujarat,

3Department of civil Engineering,DIET-Rajkot,Gujarat

Abstract - This article present parametric study of different structural system, like moment resistance frame, moment

resistance frame with shear wall, moment resistance frame with bracing, frame tube with core, outrigger with belt truss.

It is very important to ensure the adequate stiffness of structure against the lateral loading caused by wind and

earthquake. In this study we have considered 10, 20, 30, 40 storey building for each system and compered to Base shear,

Displacement, and Storey Drift. In this study analysis and design done by using IS 456, IS 1893-2002, IS 875 Part – 3.

IndexTerms - Structural System, Structural Parameter, Static and Dynamic analysis, ETABS 2015

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1. INTRODUCTION

In tall structure construction, proper structural system used more important to lateral stability, against the earthquake and wind.

Different lateral structural system are getting stability against the lateral forces in the tall structure. Behaviour of different structural

systems is having different load transfer mechanism. Generally in case of high-rise structure, stiffness requirement in terms of inter

storey drift and top storey displacements are important criteria to control.

1.1 Structural Systems

1.1.1 Moment Resistance system

Moment resisting frame is assembly of the columns and beams, joined by moment resisting frame connections. Building

performance during the earthquake, criteria of building will depend on material, strength, and ductility of structure components and

detailing of reinforcement. Moment resistance system are capable to resist to both type of load gravity load and lateral load safely.

And also control to structure parameter like displacement, storey drift.

When the building are tall, beam and column size becomes heavy, and steel area required large so that limitation of moment

resistance system to some height.

1.1.2 Moment Resistance System With Shear wall

Shear walls have very high in plan stiffness and strength, which can be used to simultaneously resistance large horizontal loads

and support gravity load. Shear wall can be defined as structural vertical member that is able to resist combination of shear,

moment, and axial load by the gravity and lateral load transfer to the wall from other structural member.

1.1.3 Moment Resistance System with Bracing

Type of bracing

(1) Concentrically braced frame

(2) Eccentrically braced frame

(1) Concentrically braced frame

Concentrically braced frame consists of diagonal brace member pinned to beam column junction. The braced impart high elastic

stiffness. Which are allowed designing the structure with small drift.

(2) Eccentrically braced frame

Eccentrically braced frame arranged that at least one of end of each brace is connected is to isolate a segment of beams called a

link. By combination of frame and truss action, they resist lateral force and by flexural and shear yielding develop ductility in link.

1.1.4 Frame Tube with Core

Frame tube is simplest is the perimeter closed spaced column and connected by deep beams. The system has large open floor

area with few interior columns design only for vertical load to carry, and total lateral load the exterior columns are designed.

1.1.5 Outrigger with Belt Truss

In this System centrally located share wall core with the peripheral columns through deep girder at top at some intermediate

level also, the lateral stiffness of multi-storey building can be highly improved. In steel buildings the core is made of vertical truss

and outrigger is horizontal truss. These outriggers mobilize the axial stiffness of column in resisting the lateral load and

simultaneously reduce the bending moment in column and beams.

Numerical Study

The Plan of the building model are given below:

Model 1- Floor Plan of the Moment Resistance Frame.

Model 2- Floor Plan of the Moment Resistance Frame with Shear wall.

Model 3- Floor Plan of the Moment Resistance Frame with Bracing.

May 2016, Volume 3, Issue 5 JETIR (ISSN-2349-5162)

JETIR1605027 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 138

Model 4- Floor Plan of Frame tube with core.

Model 5- Floor Plan of Outrigger with belt truss.

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3

Model 4 Model 5

Fig,1 All Structural System ETABS 2015 Model

Table-1 Geometric Data

Geometric Data

Plan dimension of bays : 30m × 30m

Grade of Concrete : M-20,25,30,35,40

Height of building: 30, 45, 60, 75, 90,105,120,135,150m (3.0m

storey ht.)

Density of concrete : 25 kN/m3

Size of Column:381,450,530,600,685,762,900mm

Density of Masonry : 20 kN/m3

Size of Beam : 230 mm × 580 mm ,300 x 900mm

Wall Load: 13. 8kN/m, 6.9 kN/m

Slab Thickness :150 mm

Live Load : 2 kN/m2

May 2016, Volume 3, Issue 5 JETIR (ISSN-2349-5162)

JETIR1605027 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 139

WallThickness : 150,230mm

Zone factor: 0.16

Size of Bracing :91.5,110,5,120,150,170,200,mm

Importance factor: 5 (SMRF building)

Wind Speed : 39m/s Soil type: medium soil

Terrain Category : 2

Damping ratio: 0.05 (5%)

Structural Class : B

Time Period : 0.09*h/Square root D

RiskFactor:1

Topography Factor(K3) :1

Result for 10 storey building comparison of Displacement & Storey Drift in X and Y direction.

Fig. 2 displacement for 10 storey model Fig. 3 storey drift for 10 storey model

Result for 20 storey building comparison of Displacement & Storey Drift in X and Y direction.

Fig. 4 displacement for 20 storey model Fig. 5 storey drift for 20 storey model

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 50 100

ST

OR

EY

DISPLACEMENT

Moment

Resistance

Frame

M & R Frame

With Shearwall

M & R Frame

With Braced

Fram tube with

core

Outtrrigar with

Belt Truss

024681012

0 20

ST

OR

EY

DRIFT

Moment

Resistance

Frame

M & R Frame

With Shearwall

M & R Frame

With Braced

Frame Tube

With Core

Outriggar

System

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 50 100

ST

OR

EY

DISPLACEMENT

Moment

Resistance

Frame

M & R Frame

With Shear

Wall

M & R Frame

With Braced

Frame Tube

With Core

Outriggar

System

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0 5 10

ST

OR

EY

STORY DRIFT

Moment

Resistance

Frame

M & R Frame

With Shear

Wall

M & R Frame

With Braced

Frame Tube

With Core

Outrigger

System

May 2016, Volume 3, Issue 5 JETIR (ISSN-2349-5162)

JETIR1605027 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 140

Result for 30 storey building comparison of Displacement & Storey Drift in X and Y direction.

Fig. 6 displacement for 30 storey model Fig. 7 storey drift for 30 storey model

Result for 40 storey building comparison of Displacement & Storey Drift in X and Y direction.

Fig. 8 displacement for 10 storey model Fig. 9 storey drift for 10 storey model

Result for 10 & 20 storey building comparison of Base shear EQ+ X and EQ +Y direction.

Fig. 10 Base shear for 10 storey model Fig. 11 Base shear for 20 storey model

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 100 200

STO

REY

DISPLACEMENT

Moment Resistance Frame

M & R Frame With Shearwall

M & R Frame Wirh Braced

Frame Tube With Core

Outriggar System

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 5 10

ST

OR

EY

STORY DRIFT

Moment

Resistance

Frame

M & R Frame

With Shearwall

M & R Frame

With Braced

Frame Tube

With Core

Outrigar

System

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 200 400

ST

OR

EY

DISPLACEMENT

Moment

Reaistance

Frame

M & R Frame

With Shearwall

M & R Frame

With Braced

Frame Tube

With Core

Outriggar

System

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 5 10

ST

OR

EY

STOREY DRIFT

Moment

Resistance

Frame

M & R Frame

With Shearwall

M & R Frrame

With Braced

Frame Tube

With Core

Outriggar

System

Moment

resistance

Frame

M &R Frame With Shear wall

M &R Frame With Brace

d Syste

m

Frame Tube With Core

Outrigger

System

EQ - X 2969 3015 2976.0 3460.0 4167

EQ - Y 2969 3015 2976.0 3460.0 4167

0500

10001500200025003000350040004500

BA

SE S

HEA

R(k

N)

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

Moment

resistance

Frame

M &R Frame With Shear wall

M &R Frame With Brace

d Syste

m

Frame Tube With Core

Outrigger

System

EQ - X 4564.7 4746 4659.2 4702.3 4735.5

EQ - Y 4564.7 4746 4659.2 4702.3 4735.5

4450

4500

4550

4600

4650

4700

4750

4800

BA

SE S

HEA

R(k

N)

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

May 2016, Volume 3, Issue 5 JETIR (ISSN-2349-5162)

JETIR1605027 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 141

Result for 30 & 40 storey building comparison of Base shear EQ+ X and EQ + Y direction.

Fig. 12 Base shear for 30 storey model Fig. 13 Base shear for 40 storey model

CONCLUSION

% = 𝑴𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝑹𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝑺𝒚𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒎 – 𝑶𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝑺𝒚𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒎

𝑴𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒔𝒚𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒎×100

From the above graph result it is seen that

The displacement &storey drift of moment resistance frame with shear wall system reduce by 75 % as compere to moment

resistance frame system storey (10 to 20 )

The displacement &Storey drift of moment resistance frame with bracing system reduce by 54 % as compere to moment

resistance frame system.

The displacement &Storey drift of frame tube system reduce by 94 % as compere to moment resistance frame system.

The displacement &Storey drift of outrigger system reduced by 96% as compere to moment resistance frame system.

The displacement &Storey drift of moment resistance frame with shear wall system reduce by 30 % as compere to

moment resistance frame with bracing system

The displacement &Storey drift of frame tube with core system reduce by 60 % as compare to moment resistance frame

with bracing system

The displacement &Storey drift of outrigger with belt truss system reduce by 65% as compare to moment resistance frame

with bracing system.

The displacement &Storey drift of frame tube with core system reduce by 10% as compare to outrigger system.

The displacement &Storey drift of moment resistance frame with bracing system reduce by 20% as compare to moment

resistance frame with shear wall system (35 to 40) Storey building.

REFERENCES

[1] Seismic Performance Evaluation Of Multi-Storied R.C. Framed Buildings With Shear Wall By Shaik Kamal Mohammed

Azam, VinodHosur International Journal Of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 4, Issue 1, January-2013 1 ISSN

2229-5518

[2] Analysis And Design And R.C. Moment Resistance Frame With And Without Shear Wall For Different Parameters By

Ambika-ChippaPrerana-Nampalli, Ijiset-International Journal Of Innovative Science Engineering And Technology Vol

Issue 6, August 2014.

[3] Effect Of Numbers And Position Of Shear Wall On Seismic Behavior Of Multstorey Structure By KasliwalSagar K.(1),

Prof M. R. Wakchaure(2) AnantwadShirish(3)

[4] “Survey Paper on Behavior of Multi-Storied R.C.C. Frame Structure Mithilesh D. Kapse(1), Rakesh R. Shinde(2)”

[5] “Behaviour of Outrigger Beams in High rise Buildings under Earthquake Loads” N. Herath, N. Haritos, T. Ngo & P.

Mendis

Moment

resistance

Frame

M &R Frame With Shear wall

M &R Frame With Brace

d Syste

m

Frame Tube With Core

Outrigger

System

EQ - X 4740 4938 4747 5055 4895

EQ - Y 4740 4938 4747 5055 4895

455046004650470047504800485049004950500050505100

BA

SE S

HEA

R(k

N)

STRYCTURAL SYSTEM

Moment

resistance Fram

e

M &R

Frame

With Shear wall

M &R

Frame

With Braced

Sys…

Frame

Tube With Core

Outrigger Syste

m

EQ - X 4586 5500 4326 5208 5161

EQ - Y 4586 5500 4326 5208 5161

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

BA

SE S

HEA

R(k

N)