Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Pade approximations of generalized
hypergeometric series
Tapani Matala-aho
Tokyo 2009 March 02
Abstract
We shall present short proofs for type II Pade approximations of
the generalized hypergeometric and q-hypergeometric series
F (t) =∞∑
n=0
∏n−1k=0 P(k)∏n−1k=0 Q(k)
tn, Fq(t) =∞∑
n=0
∏n−1k=0 P(qk)∏n−1k=0 Q(qk)
tn. (1)
In a q-exponential case we will discuss how certain modified
approximations give sharp linear independence results. Further, a
comparison is done between the remainder series approximations of
the exponential series (Prevost and Rivoal) and our modified
approximations for a q-analogue of the exponential series.
Arithmetic Motivation
An interesting part of Number Theory is involved with a question
of arithmetic nature of explicitly defined numbers.
-Irrationality
-Linear independence over a field
-Transcendency
Even more interesting with a quantitative setting.
Generalized Hypergeometric series
Let P(y) and Q(y) be polynomials and define generalized
(classical) hypergeometric and (basic) q-hypergeometric series
F (t) =∞∑
n=0
[P]n[Q]n
tn, Fq(t) =∞∑
n=0
[P; q]n[Q; q]n
tn, (2)
where
[P]n = [P(y)]n =n−1∏k=0
P(k), (3)
[P; q]n = [P(y); q]n =n−1∏k=0
P(qk). (4)
Classical hypergeometric series
Pochhammer symbol (generalized factorial)
(a)0 = 1, (a)n = a(a + 1) · · · (a + n − 1) n ∈ Z+. (5)
(1)n = n!
Hypergeometric series
AFB
(a1, ..., aA
b1, ..., bB
∣∣∣ t) =∞∑
n=0
(a1)n · · · (aA)n
n!(b1)n · · · (bB)ntn (6)
Classical case
First we will study the classical series F (t) with it’s derivativies
∆bF (t), where ∆ = t ddt .
Denote d = max{deg P(y), deg Q(y)} and let d ,m ∈ Z+ and the
numbers α1, ..., αm be given.
We start by giving explicit type II Pade approximations for the
series
∆bF (tαj), b = 0, 1, ..., d − 1; j = 1, ...,m. (7)
Our construction is based on a product expansion a la Maier
[Potenzreihen irrationalen Grenzwertes. J. Reine Angew. Math.
156, 93–148 (1927)]
Maier’s product formula
Let l ,m ∈ Z+ and α = t(α1, ..., αm) be given and define
σi = σi (l , α) bym∏
t=1
(αt − w)l =ml∑i=0
σiwi . (8)
Thenml∑i=0
σi ikαi
t = 0 (9)
for all t ∈ {1, ...,m}; k ∈ {0, ..., l − 1}.
Maier’s product formula
Moreover
σi = (−1)i∑
i1+...+im=i
(l
i1
)· · ·(
l
im
)· αl−i1
1 · · ·αl−imm . (10)
Denote
Σh =∑
h1+...+hm=h
(l
h1
)· · ·(
l
hm
)· αh1
1 · · ·αhmm (11)
Pade approximations/Classical case
Let b, d , l ,m, λ ∈ N, b < d and choose m numbers α1, ..., αm. Put
Bl ,λ(t) =ml∑i=0
tml−iσi (l , α)[Q]i+λ+bl/dc−1
[P]i+λ. (12)
Then
Bl ,λ(t)∆bF (αj t)− Al ,λ,b,j(t) = Rl ,λ,b,j(t), (13)
where
degt Bl ,λ(t) = ml , degt Al ,λ,b,j(t) ≤ ml + λ− 1 (14)
ordt=0
Rl ,λ,b,j(t) ≥ ml + bl/dc+ λ. (15)
Pade approximations/Classical case
Thus we have a gap of lenght bl/dc in the power series expansion
Bl ,λ(t)∆bF (αj t) = Al ,λ,b,j(t) + Rl ,λ,b,j(t). (16)
The polynomials Bl ,λ(t) are Pade approximant denominators in
variable t for the functions Fb,j(t) = ∆bF (tαj),
b = 0, 1, ..., d − 1; j = 1, ...,m.
Also we say that (13–15) define a Pade approximation with the
degree and order parameters
[degt B, degt A ≤, ordt=0
R ≥] = [ml ,ml + λ− 1,ml + bl/dc+ λ]
(17)
Proof
Write
Bl ,λ(t) =ml∑
h=0
thbl ,λ,h =ml∑i=0
tml−iσi
[Q]i+λ+bl/dc−1
[P]i+λ(18)
and study the expansion of the product
Bl ,λ(t)∆bF (tαj) =∞∑
N=0
rNtN , (19)
where
rN =∑
h+n=N
bl ,λ,hnbfnα
nj (20)
Proof
Put
N = ml + λ+ a (21)
Then
rN =ml∑i=0
σi
[Q]i+λ+bl/dc−1
[P]i+λ
[P]i+λ+a
[Q]i+λ+a(i + λ+ a)bαi+λ+a
j (22)
or
Proof
rN =ml∑i=0
σi[P]i+λ+a
[P]i+λ
[Q]i+λ+bl/dc−1
[Q]i+λ+a(i + λ+ a)bαi+λ+a
j (23)
If now
0 ≤ a ≤ bl/dc − 1 (24)
then
rN = αa+λj
ml∑i=0
σi (i + λ+ a)bαij ·
[P(i + λ)]a[Q(i + λ+ a)]bl/dc−a−1 (25)
Proof
By binomial theorem we may denote
(i + a + λ)b =b∑
k=0
sk ik , (26)
P(i + b) =d∑
kb=0
pkbik , Q(i + b) =
d∑kb=0
qkbik ∀b ∈ Z,
where pb, qb, sk ’s are independent of i .
Proof
Thus
[P(i + λ)]a =
ad∑K=0
∑k0+...+ka−1=K
pk0 · · · pka−1 ik0 · · · ika−1
=ad∑
K=0
PK iK , (27)
and similarly
[Q(qa+i+λ)]bl/dc−a−1 =
(bl/dc−a−1)d∑K=0
QK iK , (28)
where PK ,QK ’s are independent of i .
Proof
So,
rN = αa+λj
(a+bl/dc−a−1)d+b∑K=0
∑k+K1+K2=K
skPK1QK2
ml∑i=0
σiαij i
k+K1+K2
(29)
and finally
rN = αa+λj
(bl/dc−1)d+b∑K=0
∑k+K1+K2=K
skPK1QK2
ml∑i=0
σi iKαi
j , (30)
where 0 ≤ K ≤ (bl/dc − 1)d + b ≤ l − 1.
Proof
Hence, by using the property
ml∑i=0
σi ikαi
j = 0 (31)
for j ∈ {1, ...,m}; k ∈ {0, ..., l − 1} we have
rN = rml+λ+a = 0 ∀ 0 ≤ a ≤ bl/dc − 1. (32)
NOTE: The crucial point in the proof is formula (23) which in fact
shows how to find the right denominator polynomials.
q-world
q-series factorials (q-Pochhammer symbols):
(b, a)0 = (b, a; q)0 = 1
(b, a)n = (b, a; q)n = (b − a)(b − aq)...(b − aqn−1), n ∈ Z+
(a)n = (a; q)n = (1, a)n = (1− a)(1− aq) · · · (1− aqn−1) (33)
(q)n = (q; q)n = (1− q)...(1− qn)
q-hypergeometric (basic) series
AΦB
(a1, ..., aA
b1, ..., bB
∣∣∣ t) =∞∑
n=0
(a1)n...(aA)n
(q)n(b1)n...(bB)ntn. (34)
q-world
The q-binomial coefficients are defined by[nk
]=
(q; q)n
(q; q)k(q; q)n−k(35)
q-binomial theorem [2, p. 490, Corollary 10.2.2(c)]:
(b, a; q)n =n∑
k=0
[nk
]q(k
2)bn−k(−a)k ∀n ∈ N (36)
Pade approximations/q-world
Stihl [Arithmetische Eigenschaften spezieller Heinescher Reihen.
Math. Ann. 268, 21–41 (1984)]
Let l ,m ∈ Z+ and α = t(α1, ..., αm) be given and define
σq,i = σq,i (l , α) by
m∏t=1
(αt ,w ; q−1)l =ml∑i=0
σq,iwi (37)
Thenml∑i=0
σq,i (αjqk)i = 0 (38)
for all j ∈ {1, ...,m}; k ∈ {0, ..., l − 1}.
Pade approximations/q-world
Moreover, by q-binomial theorem,
σq,i = (−1)iq−m( l2)Σq,ml−i (39)
holds with
Σq,h = Σq,h(l , α) =∑
i1+...+im=h
[l
i1
]· · ·[
l
im
]·
q(i12)+...+(im
2 )αi11 · · ·α
imm . (40)
Pade approximations/q-world
Define a operator J = Jt by Jf (t) = f (qt) and denote again
d = max{deg P(y), deg Q(y)}.
Stihl constructed the following explicit type II Pade approximations
in variable t for the d series JbF (t), 0 ≤ b ≤ d − 1 at m points.
Pade approximations/q-world
Let b, l ,m, λ ∈ N, 0 ≤ b < d = max{deg P(y), deg Q(y)} and
choose m numbers α1, ..., αm. Put σq,i = σq,i (l , α) and
Bl ,λ(t) =ml∑
h=0
thbl ,λ,h =ml∑i=0
tml−iσq,i
[Q; q]i+λ+bl/dc−1
[P; q]i+λ(41)
Then
Bl ,λ(t)JbF (αj t)− Al ,λ,b,j(t) = Rl ,λ,b,j(t), (42)
holds with the parameters
[ml ,ml + λ− 1,ml + bl/dc+ λ]. (43)
Pade approximations/q-world
This means that the polynomials Bl ,λ(t) are Pade approximant
denominators in variable t for the functions Fb,j(t) = JbF (tαj),
b = 0, 1, ..., d − 1; j = 1, ...,m.
The linear independence results by applying the above explicit
Pade approximations of q-hypergeometric series restrict usually to
the following class of functions
F (t) =∞∑
n=0
qm(n2)
(q)n(a1)n...(al)ntn, m ≥ 2, l ≤ m − 2 (44)
with |q| < 1.
q-world/analogues of exponential series
Hence, for example, the linear independence question of
q-analogues of exponential function and Euler’s divergent series
have resisted the attacts from the explicit Pade approximations.
q-analogues of exponential series:
Eq(z) =∞∑
n=0
1
(q; q)nzn, Eq(z) =
∞∑n=0
q(n2)
(q; q)nzn (45)
A q-analogue of Euler’s divergent series:
Dq(t) =∞∑
n=0
(q; q)ntn. (46)
Arithmetic of q-series
Amou M., Andre Y., Bertrand D., Bezivin, Borwein P., Bundschuh
P., Duverney D., Katsurada M., Nesterenko Yu., Nishioka K.,
Prevost M., Rivoal T., Stihl Th., Shiokawa I., Waldscmidt M.,
Wallisser R., Vaananen K., Zudilin W.
q-world numbers
p-adic, p ∈ P:∞∑
n=1
pn
1− pn, (47)
∞∑n=1
pn
n∏i=1
1± pi
, (48)
∞∑l=0
pl2∏lj=1(1± pj)2
(49)
q-world numbers
1 +p
1 +
p2
1 +
p3
1 + . . .(50)
∞∏n=1
(1 + kpn), k = 1, ..., p − 1, (51)
∞∑n=1
pnn∏
i=1
(1 + kpi ), k = 1, ..., p − 1, (52)
q-world numbers
Real, p ∈ Z \ {0,±1}:∞∑
n=1
1
1− pn, (53)
∞∑n=1
1n∏
i=11± pi
, (54)
∞∑l=0
1∏lj=1(1± pj)2
, (55)
q-world numbers
1 +p−1
1 +
p−2
1 +
p−3
1 + . . ., (56)
∞∏n=1
(1 + kp−n), k = 0, 1, ..., p − 1, (57)
∞∑n=1
p−nn∏
i=1
(1 + kp−i ), k = 0, 1, ..., p − 1. (58)
q-world numbers
1
F1 +
1
F3 +
1
F5 + . . ., (59)
1
F2 +
1
F4 +
1
F6 + . . ., (60)
∞∑n=0
1
Fan+b, (61)
∞∑n=0
1
Lan+b, (62)
where a, b,∈ Z+, Fn and Ln are the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers,
respectively; F0 = 0,F1 = 1, L0 = 2, L1 = 1.
q-world/An analogue of Euler’s divergent series
Euler’s divergent series:∞∑
n=0
n!tn. (63)
A q-analogue of Euler’s divergent series:
Dq(t) =∞∑
n=0
(q; q)ntn. (64)
a special case of
Db(t) =∞∑
n=0
(b; q)ntn (65)
Modified Maier-Stihl/q-world
In the following we will present explicit Pade type approximations
in variable t for the q-exponential series
Fx(t) =∞∑
k=0
q(k2)(−tx)k
(t; q)k+1. (66)
First, we have
Fx(t) = Dx(t) =∞∑
n=0
(x ; q)ntn (67)
Modified Maier-Stihl/q-world
Define q-factorial polynomials
(x ; q)n =n−1∏h=0
(1− xqh) =n∑
k=0
s(n, k)xk (68)
and set s(n, k) = 0, when k < 0 or n < k .
Thenn∑
k=0
s(n, k)(−x)n−k = q(n2)xn ∀ n ∈ N (69)
which plays an essential role in the following modification.
Modified Maier-Stihl/q-world
Define the following polynomials
Bl ,ν(t) =ml∑
h=0
bl ,ν,h(t)th, (70)
with
bl ,ν,h(t) = (−1)ml−hq(ml+ν2 )−(ml+ν−h
2 )(t; q)ml+ν−hΣq,h (71)
Modified Maier-Stihl/q-world
Then by (68)
Bl ,ν(t) =ml+ν∑H=0
bl ,ν,HtH (72)
with
bl ,ν,H = qm( l2)
∑ml−i+f =H
0≤f≤i+ν≤ml+ν
q(ml+ν2 )−(i+ν
2 )s(i + ν, f )σq,i (73)
Modified Pade approximations
Now we get the following modified Pade type approximations of
the second kind for the m functions D−αj (t), (j = 1, ...,m) in
variable t. Let l , ν ∈ N and j = 1, ...,m, then
Bl ,ν(t)D−αj (t) + Al ,ν,j(t) = Ll ,ν,j(t) (74)
with
[ml + ν,ml + ν − 1, (m + 1)l + ν] (75)
By (75) we have a diagonal type Pade approximation with the free
parameter ν.
Modified Maier-Stihl/q-world
Further
Al ,ν,j(t) =ml+ν−1∑
N=0
al ,ν,j ,NtN , (76)
where
al ,ν,j ,N = −∑
H+n=N
bl ,ν,H(−αj ; q)n, (77)
and
Modified Maier-Stihl/q-world
Ll ,ν,j(t) = t(m+1)l+νq(ml+ν2 )+m( l
2)+νl(−αj ; q)lανj Sl ,ν,j(t). (78)
where
Sl ,ν,j(t) =∞∑
k=0
sl ,ν,j ,ktk (79)
with
sl ,ν,j ,k = qkν(−αjql ; q)k
m∏t=1
(αt , αjqk+1; q)l . (80)
Modified Maier-Stihl/Proof
The expansion
Bl ,ν(t)D−αj (t) =∞∑
N=0
rNtN , (81)
holds with
rN =∑
H+n=N
bl ,ν,H(−αj ; q)n. (82)
Modified Maier-Stihl/Proof
Set
N = ml + ν + a 0 ≤ a ≤ l − 1
then
rN = qm( l2)
ml∑i=0
i+ν∑f =0
q(ml+ν2 )−(i+ν
2 )s(i + ν, f )σq,i (−αj ; q)i+ν−f +a =
qm( l2)
ml∑i=0
σq,i (−αj ; q)aq(ml+ν
2 )−(i+ν2 )·
i+ν∑f =0
s(i + ν, f )(−αjqa; q)i+ν−f (83)
Modified Maier-Stihl/Proof
Here the inner f -sum is evaluated by (69) and so
rml+ν+a = qm( l2)+(ml+ν
2 )(−αj ; q)a
ml∑i=0
σq,i (αjqa)i+ν =
qm( l2)+(ml+ν
2 )+aν(−αj ; q)aανj
m∏t=1
(αt , αjqa; q−1)l = 0 (84)
for any 0 ≤ a ≤ l − 1 .
Modified Maier-Stihl/Proof
Next we consider the case a = l + k , k ∈ N. Then
rN = r(m+1)l+ν+k =
qm( l2)+(ml+ν
2 )+(l+k)ν(−αj ; q)l+kανj
m∏t=1
(αt , αjqk+1; q)l . (85)
Modified Maier-Stihl
Note that by Stihl
C (x , t) =ml∑
h=0
(xt)h(t; q)(m+1)l+λ−h· (86)
(−1)ml−hq(ml+λ+12 )−(ml+λ−h+1
2 )Σq,h
is a denominator polynomial in variable x and
Bl ,ν(t) =ml∑
h=0
(tx)h(t; q)ml+ν−h (87)
(−1)ml−hq(ml+ν2 )−(ml+ν−h
2 )Σq,h
is a denominator polynomial in variable t for
Fx(t) =∞∑
k=0
q(k2)(−tx)k
(t; q)k+1. (88)
Modified Maier-Stihl
By using the above modified approximations we may prove linear
independence measures for certain values of the functions Da(z)
and Ea(z), which can be regarded as q-analogues of Euler’s
divergent series and the usual exponential series.
For the q-exponential function Eq(z), our result asserts the linear
independence (over any number field) of the values 1 and Eq(αj)
(j = 1, ...,m) together with its measure having the exponent
ω = O(m), which sharpens the known exponent ω = O(m2)
obtained by a certain refined version of Siegel’s lemma Amou,
Matala-aho, Vaananen [On Siegel-Shidlovskii’s theory for
q-difference equations. Acta Arith. 127, 309–335 (2007)]
Modified Maier-Stihl
Let p be a prime number. Then we have the linear independence
of the p-adic numbers
∞∏n=1
(1 + kpn), k = 0, 1, ..., p − 1 (89)
over Q with a measure having the exponent
ω < 2p (90)
Valuations, heights
Let K be a fixed number field of degree κ = [K : Q], v a place of
K and | |v the associated absolute value on the completion Kv
with a local degree κv = [Kv : Qv ].
If the finite place v of K lies over the prime p, we write v |p, for an
infinite place v of K we write v |∞. We normalize the absolute
value | |v of K so that
|p|v = p−1, if v |p, (91)
|x |v = |x |, if v |∞, (92)
where | | denotes the ordinary absolute value in Q.
Valuations, heights
Further, the notation
||α||v = |α|κv/κv , κv = [Kv : Qv ], (93)
will be used in the sequel. The height H(α) of α is defined by the
formula
H(α) =∏v
||α||∗v , ||α||∗v = max{1, ||α||v} (94)
and the height H(α) of the vector α = t(α1, ..., αm) ∈ Km is given
by
H(α) =∏v
||α||∗v , ||α||∗v = maxi=1,...,m
{1, ||αi ||v}. (95)
Valuations, heights
Further, for any place v of K, and q ∈ K∗, ||q||v 6= 1, we define
the characteristic λ by
λ = λq =log H(q)
log ||q||v. (96)
Modified Maier-Stihl/Applications
To state our results we denote
ω = ωq =u0
u0 + λqs0, (97)
where
s0 = m2 + m + m√
m2 + m, (98)
u0 = m2 + m + (m + 1)√
m2 + m. (99)
Now we fix a place v of K throughout the following.
Modified Maier-Stihl/Applications
Let m ∈ Z+ be arbitrary, a, q, α1, ..., αm ∈ K∗, and |q|v < 1.
Denote by f (t) each of the functions
Dt(a), Eq(t),∞∏
n=0
(1− tqn) (100)
and assume
a /∈ q−N, αi /∈ q−N, αi /∈ αjqZ for all i 6= j , (101)
−(
1 +1
m +√
m2 + m
)< λq ≤ −1. (102)
Modified Maier-Stihl/Applications
Then the numbers 1, f (α1), ..., f (αm) belonging to Kv are linearly
independent over K. Further, there exist positive constants
c , d ,H0 depending on a and αi such that
|k0 + k1f (α1) + ...+ kmf (αm)|v >c
Hωκ/κv+d(log H)−1/2(103)
for all
k = t(k0, k1, ..., km) ∈ Km+1 \ {0}
with H = max(H(k),H0).
Modified Maier-Stihl/Applications
Here we note that λq ≤ −1 always holds for |q|v < 1, and the
following cases in particular assert λq = −1:
1. K = I, v is the infinite place of K, and 1/q ∈ ZK;
2. K = Q, v = p ∈ P, and q = pl , l ∈ Z+;
3. K = Q(√
5), q = ((1−√
5)/2)l , l ∈ Z+.
Now, if we take the value λ = −1, then we have
ω = m + 1 +√
m2 + m < 2m + 2 (104)
and in general we have ω = O(m),too.
Modified Maier-Stihl/Applications
In the cases 1–3 we have
|L0 + L1f (α1) + ...+ Lmf (αm)|p >c
H2m+2+d(log H)−1/2(105)
for all
L = t(L0, L1, ..., Lm) ∈ Zm+1 \ {0}
with H = maxi=0,...,m
(|Li |,H0).
Modified Maier-Stihl/Applications
Let p ∈ P. Then in each of the four sets∞∏
n=1
(1 + kpn), k = 0, 1, ..., p − 1, (106)
∞∑n=1
pnn∏
i=1
(1 + kpi ), k = 0, 1, ..., p − 1, (107)
∞∏n=1
(1 + kp−n), k = 0, 1, ..., p − 1, (108)
∞∑n=1
p−nn∏
i=1
(1 + kp−i ), k = 0, 1, ..., p − 1. (109)
of p numbers we have the linear independence of the p numbers
over Q with a measure having an exponent
ω < 2p. (110)
q-world
q-difference equations
Eq(qz) = (1− z)Eq(z), Eq(z) = (1 + z)Eq(qz). (111)
By using (111) one gets the well-known Euler formulae
Eq(z) =1
(z)∞, Eq(z) = (−z)∞. (112)
q-identities
From (112) we get
Eq(t)Eq(−t) = 1 (113)
which implies
E1/q,1/q(t)Eq,q(qt) = 1 (114)
The following connects q-exponentials and q-divergent
∞∑n=0
q(n2)αn
(qz)nzn = 1 + αzD−α,q(qz) (115)
Remaider series technique
Prevost and Rivoal [Remainder Pade Approximants for the
Exponential Function. Constr. Approx. 25, 109–123 (2007)]
presented new Pade type approximations for the classical
exponential series using the remainder series technique, invented in
Prevost [A new proof of the irrationality of ζ(2) and ζ(3) using
Pade approximants. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 67, 219–235 (1996)].
To be more precise, they constructed approximations in variable t
for the exponential remainder series
Φxαj (t) =∞∑
k=0
(xαj)k
(1− 1/t)k, j = 1, ...,m (116)
Remaider series technique/Modified Maier
It is interesting that the above series Φx(t) and Dx(t) share a
formal similarity. Namely
Φx(t) =∞∑
k=0
(−tx)k
[1− ty ]k+1=∞∑
k=0
xk
(1− 1/t)k; (117)
[1− ty ]k+1 = (1− t · 0)(1− t · 1)(1− t · 2) · · · (1− t · k) (118)
and
Dx(t) =∞∑
k=0
q(k2)(−tx)k
[1− ty ; q]k+1= −1
t
∞∑k=0
(x/q)k
(1/t; 1/q)k+1; (119)
[1− ty ; q]k+1 = (1− tq0)(1− tq1)(1− tq2) · · · (1− tqk) (120)
Remaider series technique/Modified Maier
By applying the above modified Maier’s method we may give
another proof for the new Pade approximations for the exponential
remaider series
Φx(t) =∞∑
k=0
(−tx)k
[1− ty ]k+1=∞∑
k=0
xk
(1− 1/t)k. (121)
given by Prevost and Rivoal. Prevost and Rivoal showed that
Φx(t) =∞∑
n=0
Tn(−x)tn, (122)
where Tn(x) are Touchard polynomials
Remaider series technique/Modified Maier
Tn(x) =n∑
k=0
S2(n, k)xk (123)
defined with Stirling numbers of the second kind S2(n, k). Further,
In the following s1(n, k) denote the Stirling numbers of first kind.
So our aim is to construct explicit simultaneous Pade type
approximations in variable t for the series
Φ−αj (t) =∞∑
n=0
Tn(αj)tn, j = 1, ...,m. (124)
Remaider series technique/Modified Maier
We now define
Bl ,ν(t) =ml∑
h=0
bl ,ν,h(t)th, (125)
with
bl ,ν,h(t) = (−1)ml−h[1− ty ]ml+ν−hΣh(α), (126)
Then
Bl ,ν(t) =ml+ν∑H=0
bl ,ν,HtH , (127)
with
bl ,ν,H =∑
ml−i+f =H0≤f≤i+ν≤ml+ν
s1(i + ν, i + ν − f )σi (α) (128)
Remaider series technique/Modified Maier
Let l , ν,m ∈ N and choose m numbers α1, ..., αm. Then
Bl ,ν(t)Φ−αj (t) + Al ,ν,j(t) = Ll ,ν,j(t) (129)
with
[ml + ν,ml + ν − 1, (m + 1)l + ν] (130)
give a diagonal type Pade approximation of the second kind with a
free parameter ν.
Remaider series technique/Modified Maier/Proof
Now we note that
[1− ay ]k = (1−a ·0)(1−a ·1)(1−a ·2) · · · (1−a ·(k−1)) = (131)
ak(1/a)k =k∑
i=0
s1(k , i)ak−i =k∑
i=0
s1(k , k − i)ai
Thus
Bl ,ν(t) =ml∑i=0
tml−i [1− ty ]i+νσi =
ml+ν∑H=0
tH∑
ml−i+f =H0≤f≤i+ν≤ml+ν
s1(i + ν, i + ν − f )σi =
ml+ν∑H=0
bl ,ν,HtH , (132)
Remaider series technique/Modified Maier
We next study the expansion of the product
Bl ,ν(t)Φ−αj (t) =∞∑
N=0
rNtN , (133)
where
rN =∑
H+n=N
bl ,ν,HTn(αj) (134)
Set
N = ml + ν + a, 0 ≤ a ≤ l − 1, a ∈ N. (135)
Then
H = ml − i + f , H + n = N. (136)
Remaider series technique/Modified Maier
It follows that n = i + ν − f + a and thus
rN =ml∑i=0
σi
i+ν∑f =0
s1(i + ν, i + ν − f )Ti+ν−f +a(αj) =
ml∑i=0
σi
i+ν∑f =0
a+ν+i−f∑e=0
s1(i + ν, i + ν − f )S2(a + ν + i − f , e)αej (137)
Denote for shortly I = i + ν, K = I − f . Then we are led to study
the following inner sums
Remaider series technique/Modified Maier
Ha =I∑
K=0
a+K∑e=0
s1(I ,K )S2(a + K , e)αej =
a+I∑e=0
αej
I∑K=e−a
s1(I ,K )S2(a + K , e) =
a+I∑e=0
αej
I∑K=0
s1(I ,K )S2(a + K , e) (138)
Generalized Stirling orthogonality
Let a ∈ N. For all I , e ∈ N we have
I∑K=0
s1(I ,K )S2(a + K , e) =∑
0≤b,d≤a
Cb,d(a)edδI ,e−b (139)
where the numbers Cb,d(a) do not depend on I and e.
Remaider series technique/Modified Maier
First
H0 =I∑
e=0
αej
I∑K=0
s1(I ,K )S2(K , e) =
I∑e=0
αej δIe = αI
j = αi+νj (140)
which by (9) shows
rml+ν =ml∑i=0
σiαi+νj = ανj
ml∑i=0
σiαij = 0. (141)
Remaider series technique/Modified Maier
Further
H1 =I∑
e=0
αej
I∑K=0
s1(I ,K )S2(K + 1, e) =
I∑e=0
αej (δI ,e−1 + eδIe) = αI+1
j + IαIj = αi+ν+1
j + (i + ν)αi+νj (142)
which by (9) shows
rml+ν+1 =ml∑i=0
σiαi+ν+1j + (i + ν)αi+ν
j =
(αν+1j + νανj )
ml∑i=0
σiαij + ανj
ml∑i=0
σi iαij = 0. (143)
Remaider series technique/Modified Maier
And in full generality by (139) we have
Ha =a+I∑e=0
αej
∑0≤b,d≤a
Cb,dedδI ,e−b =
∑0≤b,d≤a
Cb,d
a+I∑e=0
αej e
dδI ,e−b =
∑0≤b,d≤a
Cb,dαI+bj (I + b)d =
∑0≤b,d≤a
Cb,dαi+ν+bj (i + ν + b)d =
∑0≤b,d≤a
Cb,dαi+ν+bj
d∑g=o
(d
g
)ig (b + ν)d−g (144)
Remaider series technique/Modified Maier
which gives
rml+ν+a =ml∑i=0
σiHa =
∑0≤b,d≤a
d∑g=0
Cb,dαi+ν+bj
(d
g
)(b + ν)d−g
ml∑i=0
σiαij i
g (145)
where 0 ≤ g ≤ a ≤ l − 1. Hence, again by using (9) we may
deduce
rml+ν+a = 0 (146)
for any 0 ≤ a ≤ l − 1 .
References
I [1]. Amou M., Matala-aho T., Vaananen K.: On
Siegel-Shidlovskii’s theory for q-difference equations. Acta
Arith. 127, 309–335 (2007)
I [2]. Andrews G., Askey R., Roy R.: Special Functions,
Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 71.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
I [3]. Chudnovsky G. V.: Pade approximations to the
generalized hypergeometric functions. I. J. Math. pures et
appl. 58, 445–476 (1979)
I [4]. Hata M.: Remarks on Mahler’s Transcendence Measure
for e. J. Number Theory 54, 81–92 (1995)