OSD Readiness and Training CE2T2 Assessments JAEC Assessment Working Group WJTSC 09-1 23 Mar 2009

OSD Readiness and TrainingOSD Readiness and Training

CE2T2 AssessmentsCE2T2 Assessments

JAEC Assessment Working GroupJAEC Assessment Working GroupWJTSC 09-1WJTSC 09-123 Mar 200923 Mar 2009

This briefing is UNCLASSIFIED

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability

OSD Readiness and Training Policy and Programs

AS OF 17 MAR 2009

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 2

OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG

Agenda

0800-0815 Introduction

0815-0845 Meeting objectives & assessment overview

0845-0900 Data collection process

0900-1015 Framework & metrics

Gaps

Improvement plans

Input from community

1015-1100 Way ahead, wrap-up

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 3


Introductions

• Please update the contact list as necessary– Request SIPRNet email for at least one person each

organization– Blank lines on last pages

• Around the room

• Analysts who support JAEC assessment

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 4


Meeting Objectives

• Improve data processes

• Discuss changes to metrics– Changes would have to be approved by leadership

• Identify issues for other meetings– 1-on-1 with JAEC analysts at WJTSC– Other options: monthly update telcon, ad hoc telcon

• This isn’t an IPR – We will focus on process and metrics instead of analysis– Major discussion topics may be noted for other meetings

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 5


CE2T2 Assessment Purpose

Purpose of CE2T2 Assessments

• Communicate goals and performance to members of the

enterprise

• Help all members of the enterprise track performance

• Inform T2 and CE2 leadership of significant trends and the

impact of training programs

• Support key enterprise decision making

• Provide key information on the program to support dialogue

with professional congressional staff members

Enterprise assessment will identify trends across the Services and COCOMs to demonstrate relevance and impact of joint training

Sep 2008 Brief to T2 LeadershipSep 2008 Brief to T2 Leadership

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 6


6

Leadership Priorities

Six leadership priorities focus our assessment:

• Joint training accomplished prior to combat

deployment

• Irregular warfare training

• Whole of government and international training

• Impact of joint training

• Impact of joint training enablers

• Implementation of joint training

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 7


Build Framework to the Enterprise View

Process for funding and

managing CE2T2

Funding of software/hardware enablers for CE2T2

Providing resources for

exercise training

Effectiveness of training in improving mission performance

Exercises accomplished

Setting up exercises that provide training in the priority areas:

- joint - irregular warfare - whole of government - multinational

Individual training accomplished

• Our assessment is focused at the enterprise level - we want to get as close to the top as possible using the best available metric• A metric without the data is not useful

Level of Metric

HIGH

LOW

Ease of Quantifying

HARDEST

EASIEST

Best Sourceof Data

OPERATORS

TRAINERS

PROGRAMMERS

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 8


Assessment Framework & Lead Analysts

Enterprise Priority Analysis Topics Lead Analyst

Joint training accomplished prior to deployment

1. JNTC-accredited unit joint training accomplished prior to deployment Tony Handy

2. Joint Task Force Headquarters staff collective training Tony Handy

3. Joint Task Force Headquarters staff individual training (JKDDC contribution)

Stan Horowitz

Irregular warfare training 4. Irregular warfare and stability operations at Service training centers Jennifer Rausch

Whole of government and international training

5. Whole of government training Tony Handy

6. International participation in training exercises Tony Handy

Impact of joint training7. Enterprise view of joint training outcomes John Morrison

8. CE2T2 impact on qualifying joint officers Stan Horowitz

Impact of joint training enablers

9. Distributed network for joint training John Ross

10. Research and development for joint training Jennifer Rausch

11. Implementation of Joint Training Information Management System John Morrison

12. Implementation of Joint Lessons Learned Information System Tony Handy

Implementation of joint training

13. Impact of CE2T2 on meeting Service event requirementsJohn Morrison &

John Ross

14. Impact of CE2T2 on meeting COCOMs event requirements John Morrison

15. Impact of CE2T2 meeting individual joint training requirements Stan Horowitz

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 9


Data Collection Process

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 10


Data Collection Process

• Goal: use existing data sources to the maximum extent (JTIMS, other sites, deployment schedules, training schedules, etc.)

• Reality: JAEC has found value in Service and COCOM review of data - Verification and Validation (V&V)

• Actions– JAEC continues to gather data approx 1/20, 4/20, 7/20, and 10/20– JAEC emails preliminary data to Services and COCOMs for

review, makes corrections, and establishes business rules

Individual organization concerns – see Mr. Tony Handy

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 11


Reference: JTIMS Event Module Data Elements for CE2T2 Assessment (1)

Data Element Entry Screen JTIMS Role

Training Program

Training Program Name Description tab User Group Lead, Event Manager

Program Sponsoring Command Description tab User Group Lead, Event Manager

JNTC Accredited Description tab User Group Lead, Event Manager

Training Events/Exercises

Event Name Description tab User Group Lead, Event Manager, Event Team Lead

Employment Start Date Details tab User Group Lead, Event Manager, Event Team Lead

Employment End Date Details tab User Group Lead, Event Manager, Event Team Lead

Tasks Trained Training Objective Tab User Group Lead, Event Team Lead

Task Description Training Objective Tab User Group Lead, Event Team Lead

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 12


Reference: JTIMS Event Module Data Elements for CE2T2 Assessment (2)

Data Element Entry Screen JTIMS Role

Training Events/Exercises

UIC Force Tab, Force Provider Interface Force Provider

Participating Unit Name / Agency Name Force Tab, Force Provider Interface Force Provider

Organization Affiliation Force Tab, Force Provider Interface Force Provider

Participating Interagency Name Force Tab, Force Provider Interface Force Provider

Participating Coalition Unit Name Force Tab, Force Provider Interface Force Provider

Affiliation Type Force Tab, Force Provider Interface Force Provider

Was JTEN Used? Simulation tab User Group Lead, Event Team Lead

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 13


Analysis Topics

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 14


Assessment Framework & Lead Analysts

Enterprise Priority Analysis Topics Lead Analyst

Joint training accomplished prior to deployment

1. JNTC-accredited unit joint training accomplished prior to deployment Tony Handy

2. Joint Task Force Headquarters staff collective training Tony Handy

3. Joint Task Force Headquarters staff individual training (JKDDC contribution)

Stan Horowitz

Irregular warfare training 4. Irregular warfare and stability operations at Service training centers Jennifer Rausch

Whole of government and international training

5. Whole of government training Tony Handy

6. International participation in training exercises Tony Handy

Impact of joint training7. Enterprise view of joint training outcomes John Morrison

8. CE2T2 impact on qualifying joint officers Stan Horowitz

Impact of joint training enablers

9. Distributed network for joint training John Ross

10. Research and development for joint training Jennifer Rausch

11. Implementation of Joint Training Information Management System John Morrison

12. Implementation of Joint Lessons Learned Information System Tony Handy

Implementation of joint training

13. Impact of CE2T2 on meeting Service event requirementsJohn Morrison &

John Ross

14. Impact of CE2T2 on meeting COCOMs event requirements John Morrison

15. Impact of CE2T2 meeting individual joint training requirements Stan Horowitz

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 15


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Overall 82.0% 64.9% 62.3% 80.8% 82.1% 77.9% 82.0% 87.1% 77.8%

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

FY07 FY08 FY09Quarterly

Active Duty Combat Units Target (Annual)

1. JNTC-Accredited Unit Joint Training Accomplished Prior to Deployment

Metric

Percent of units deployed to combat operations that participated in JNTC-accredited Service joint training prior to deploying

Notes:

1.Unit = commanded by an O-5 or above

2.Top-level metric shows active duty combat units, but JAEC also has data for CS and CSS, and RC

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training

FindingsParticipation rate continues to exceed target levels

Potential Future Developments1. Address operational deployments in addition to

combat deployments2. Verify accuracy of RC data for inclusion and analysis

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 16


2. Joint Task Force Headquarters Staff Collective Training

Potential Future DevelopmentExpand analysis to rotational and operational JTF HQ

reporting in DRRS

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training * From the Draft JTF HQ CONOPS: JTF-capable: A Designated Service HQ that has achieved and can sustain a level of readiness to stand up as a JTF HQ, which is acceptable to the supported/assigned Combatant Commander.

Metrics

a. Percent of deployed JTF HQ* that participated in Unified Endeavor (UE) mission readiness exercise (MRX)

b. Status of JTF-capable headquarters reporting readiness in DRRS

*JTF HQ: Joint Task Force Headquarters

Findings

a. 100% of units deployed as rotational JTF HQ participated in UE MRXs

b. Of the 8 certified JTF-capable headquarters:

• 6 have current reports in DRRS • 3 commented that readiness ratings were

verified/certified by performance in training exercises

• 2 stated concern over preserving staff training level and expanding staff and individual training opportunities

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 17


3. Joint Task Force Headquarters Staff Individual Training (JKDDC Contribution)

Metric

Percent of JTF staff receiving theater-focused JKDDC training before deployment

- Initial pilot study addressed CJTF-HOA*

* Combined Joint Task Force - Horn of Africa

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training

Potential Future DevelopmentExpand analysis beyond CJTF-HOA; options include:

•Cooperation of other JTF HQ J1s•Use DMDC data to identify assigned personnel

FindingsInitial findings indicated relatively small percent of CJTF-HOA staff trained in JKDDC; however, more recent findings show dramatic increases

Entire staff Newly-reporting personnel in Q1 FY09Q4

FY08Q1

FY09

Total 273 272 77

JKO Trained 24 78 39

% JKO Trained 9% 29% 51%

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 18


4. Irregular Warfare and Stability Operations at Service Training Centers

Metric

Percent of service units training in irregular warfare and stability operations (IW/SO) at major service training centersNote: Unit = commanded by an O-5 or above

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training

Service FY08 Q1 FY09 Target

Army 100% 100% 90%

Navy 89% 100% 60%

Air Force 100% 100% 75%

Marine Corps 100% 100% 90%

Potential Future DevelopmentsLeave as is?

Findings•Continuing into FY09, Service data indicate training centers exceed targets•Each Service has a different target, driven by the contemporary operating environment.•Percentage of events at Service training centers that included IW/SO:

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 19


Metric

Percentage of joint training events that include participation by interagency personnelNote: events are JNTC-accredited Service training events and COCOM events supported by CE2 or T2 funding

5. Whole of Government Training

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training

Interagency Participation

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

FY07 FY08 FY09

Aggregated Services COCOMs

Interagency Participation

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

FY07 FY08 FY09


Potential Future Developments1. Identify requirements and performance targets (RTPP lead)2. Improve definitions3. JAEC understand each organization’s JTIMS reporting

practices

Findings•General trend has been slightly declining participation•Differences between COCOMs and Services (only recently disaggregated) may represent differing requirements

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 20


6. International Participation in Training Exercises

Metric

Percentage of joint training events that include participation by international personnelNote: events are JNTC-accredited Service training events and COCOM events supported by CE2 or T2 funding

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training

International Participation

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

FY07 FY08 FY09


International Participation

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

FY07 FY08 FY09


Findings•General trend has been slightly increasing participation•Differences between COCOMs and Services (only recently disaggregated) may represent differing requirements

Potential Future Developments1. Identify requirements and performance targets (RTPP lead)2. Improve definitions3. JAEC understand each organization’s JTIMS reporting

practices

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 21


7. Enterprise View of Joint Training Outcomes

Metricsa. Portion of COCOM tasks trained in COCOM and Service exercises, and training proficiency assessments of performance on those tasks

b. Common strengths and weaknesses across the enterprise

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training

Potential Future DevelopmentAutomate process to provide semi-annual or quarterly updates (JAEC and JTIMS Program Office action)

Findingsa. 48% of JMETs had published assessments in JTIMS (Data manually extracted from COCOM Joint Training Plans (JTPs) published at the end of FY08)

b. Assessments showed some strengths and weaknesses that were common across the COCOMs, as well as some striking deficiencies that were more localSpecific findings available in classified forum

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 22


8. CE2T2 Impact on Qualifying Joint Officers

MetricFraction of Joint Qualified Officer (JQO) points generated by JKDDC-provided individual training

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training

FY 07 FY08

Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Institut. Learning

Distrib. Learning 137 150 164 202 205 216

Experience

Total

Potential Future DevelopmentWorking with JS J1 to complete the chart

Findings•Points awarded through distributed learning up 58% from the third quarter of FY 2007•As of November 2008 163 Joint Qualified Officer Points have been available through JFCOM-certified courses

•129 through institutional courses•34 using distributed learning (1 blended course)•1 point per 40 hours of training•Points are also awarded for joint experience

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 23


9. Distributed Network for Joint Training

MetricJoint Training and Experimentation Network (JTEN) usage in CE2T2 exercises as reflected by the following data (PBR 821)

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training

Potential Future DevelopmentNone planned

Findings•Almost every metric indicates increasing JTEN usage from FY06 to FY08•Prorated Q1 FY09 data (4X) suggests that increases will be sustained into FY09

(Table in backup)

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 24


10. Research and Development for Joint Training

Metrics

Value of R&D programs as determined by the following data (PBRs 718 and 721):

a. Status of accomplishing 13 certifications and 17 assessments (PBR 718)

b. Number of times virtual AC-130 simulation was integrated into National Training Center (NTC), MAGTF Training Center (Mojave Viper), and Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) rotations in FY09 (PBR 721)

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training

Potential Future DevelopmentThis is based on PBR measures of effectiveness submitted in 2008

FindingsData are collected and reported by JATTL as part of the PBR process

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 25


11. Implementation of Joint Training Information Management System

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training

Findingsa. All COCOM CE2T2 events in

JTIMS, minority of events provide training objective or audience data

b.• 6 of the 10 COCOMs had Approved

Training Assessments in JTIMS• ~ 40% of Core Mission, Command-

Level JMETs have published assessments

(Tables in backup)

Metrics a. Percentage of COCOM CE2T2 events that provide specific data* in JTIMS

b. Percentage of COCOMs publishing assessments in JTIMS

* Data: training objective or audienceNote: JTIMS is funded by PBR 11001.

Potential Future DevelopmentNone planned

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 26


12. Implementation of Joint Lessons Learned Information System

Metric/Statistics• Use of the Joint Lessons Learned Information

System (JLLIS) as indicated by the following data:– Since 1 Oct 07, 27 organizations have signed up to

use JLLIS• Joint Staff 1• COCOMs 10• 3 Services + NGB 4• CSA-4, Interag’cy-3 7• Other organizations 5

– Number of JLLIS Users

– Number of Active Lessons

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training

Sep 07 Sep 08 CY09 Q1 CY09 Q2NIPR 9,584 23,456 28,550SIPR 5,607 10,475 15,623

Sep 07 Sep 08 CY09 Q1 CY09 Q2NIPR 7,244 25,800 29,855SIPR 16,671 89,462 99,328

Findings•Trend analysis requires dedicated analysts; currently no automated tool.•The USMC Center for Lessons Learned, USAF, and USN have been instrumental in the outstanding progress JLLIS has made over the past 18 months.

Potential Future Developments•By Oct 09, JLLIS should be FOC with all COCOMs using and sharing data via JLLIS and all legacy data imported into the system.•As JLLIS establishes linkages between its stakeholders and other systems, the current statistics can be expanded to provide better metrics on the integration of JLLIS data in DOTMLPF programs.

(PBR 11007)

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 27


FY2008

Service events impacted by JTCP

JCTP-supported participation in other-Service events

Army 0 7

Navy 9 6

Marine Corps

5 4

Air Force 9 7

13. Impact of CE2T2 on Meeting Service Event Requirements

Metrics

a. Percent of training objectives* addressed by JNTC-accredited Service training programs

b. Number of events impacted by the Joint Training Coordination Program (JTCP) (PBRs 2306, 921, 903B, and 903A)

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training

Findingsa. 29 objectives (24%) are addressed by JNTC-accredited tasks trained in program

b.

Potential Future DevelopmentTBD

*JFCOM JTP identified 121 unique training objectives, derived from 16 training priorities identified in OSD published guidance. Each objective comprises one or more UJT, relevant conditions, and a training standard.

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 28


14. Impact of CE2T2 on Meeting COCOM Event Requirements

Metric

Percent of COCOM training requirements addressed by CE2T2 training events

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training


Findings•“Training requirements” defined by command-level JMETs in COCOM JMETLs•The results indicate that the 25 CE2T2 events that occurred in Q1 FY2009 trained about ¼ of the COCOMs’ training requirements as defined

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 29


15. Impact of CE2T2 on Meeting Individual Joint Training Requirements

Joint training

accomplished

prior to combat

deployment

Irregular

warfare training

Whole of

government

and

international

training

Impact of joint

training

Impact of joint

training

enablers

Implementation

of joint training

Metric

Percent of COCOM joint mission essential tasks (JMETs) addressed by JKDDC courseware – command and supporting

End of FY07

End of FY08

Q1 FY09

Number of JMETs addressed by JKDDC courses

524 (est.)

860 878

Percent of JMETs addressed by JKDDC courses

15% (est.)

24% 24%


Findings

LAST ANALYSISLAST ANALYSISTOPIC SLIDETOPIC SLIDE

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 30


CE2T2 Assessment Way Ahead

Next 60 days

1. Exploit existing qualitative data sources– Examples: News You Can Use, JNTC SE Event Summaries

2. Expand use of DRRS – Training-related comments

– Pending business intelligence tool should help

3. Publish planned documents– Collection plan: “reference” for the community

– DoD Instruction: assessment portion

– If necessary, JSAP as a temporary measure until DoDI is published (AO-to-AO)

4. Develop or refine performance targets where appropriate– Collaborate with community, approved by leadership

Longer term

Pursue identified Potential Future Developments

Prepare and vet FY2009 annual assessment; initial draft at WJTSC 09-2

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 31


Questions?Questions?

Contacts:

David Baranek, JAEC analyst: [email protected]

Tony Handy, JAEC JTS Specialist: [email protected]

John Ross, JAEC analyst at JFCOM: [email protected]

31

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 32


FY09 Q1 Summary Assessment (1)

• Joint training accomplished prior to deployment– Unit participation in accredited training events continues to

exceed goals– Deployed JTF HQ staff training (MRXs) appears to meet

requirements– Comments in DRRS on collective training for JTF-capable HQ

reveal concern over maintaining currency

• Irregular warfare and stability operations training– Training exceeds goals

• Whole of government and international training– OSD(RTPP), Joint Staff J7 (JETD) working on developing

definitions and requirements

Presented at T2 JIPT, 23 Feb 2009Presented at T2 JIPT, 23 Feb 2009

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 33



• Impact of joint training– Results showed some strengths and weaknesses that were

common across the COCOMs, as well as some striking deficiencies that were more local – details are classified

– JKDDC/JS J7 contribution to Joint Qualified Officer program is increasing

• Impact of joint training enablers– Almost every metric indicates increasing Joint Training and

Experimentation Network (JTEN) usage since FY2006– Initial data from Joint Lessons Learned Information System

(JLLIS) show steep increase in number of users and active lessons

– Other metrics rely on data not yet available, including PBR measures of effectiveness


WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 34



• Implementation of joint training– JNTC-accredited Service training programs addressed 24% of

the 121 training objectives identified by USJFCOM* – CE2T2 events in Q1 FY09 trained about ¼ of command-level

JMETs in COCOM JMETLs– JKDDC online resources addressed 24% of JMETs in COCOM

JMETLs, an increase from 15% end of FY07

*The JFCOM Joint Training Plan, Tab H, lists 16 priorities derived from strategic guidance and COCOM inputs, divided into 121 training objectives. The objectives themselves comprise one or more UJTL tasks, relevant conditions, and a training standard.


WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 35


Analysis Topic 2b: Joint Task Force Headquarters Staff Collective TrainingAssessment Reporting by JTF-Capable Headquarters

COCOMJTF Capable HQ /

CommandService

UICJoint UIC

JTF HQ Task(s) in

METL?DRRS Assessment

Date

AFRICOMSouthern European Task Force (formerly EUCOM)

WJHEAA Yes 15 DEC 2008

EUCOM 6th Fleet N57042 Yes 24 JUL 2006

EUCOM 3rd Air Force FFDJ30 No No

JFCOM 2nd Fleet / JTF-South N08961 DJ2C2F Yes 20 JAN 2009

PACOM COMPACFLT / JTF 519 N00070 DJ5519 Yes 13 JAN 2009

PACOM 7th Fleet / JTF 507 N57024 DJ5507 Yes 9 JAN 2009

NORTHCOM 5th Army / USARNORTH WJMHAA Yes 6 JAN 2009

SOUTHCOM 6th Army / USARSOUTH WJMWAA Yes 15 DEC 2008

Plan to certify five additional headquarters in FY2009: 7 th Army, III MEF, 20th Support Command, 5th Fleet/USNAVCENT, 3rd Army/USARCENT

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 36


Analysis Topic 9. Distributed Network for Joint Training

Metric FY06 FY07 FY08 Q1 FY09

Total Events 40 69 88 26

COCOM Events 12 28 41 15

Service Events 28 41 47 11

CE2T2 Events 31 45 70 23

Non-CE2T2 Events 9 24 18 3

JTEN Hours Used 10,923 17,376 26,683 7638

CE2T2 Hours 9,831 15,638 24,464

Non-CE2T2 Hours 1,092 1,738 2,219

Participating Sites (Incl Hub Sites)

219 404 432 149

First-time Use Sites 5 1 5 1

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 37


Analysis Topic 11a. Implementation of Joint Training Information Management System

Percentage of COCOM CE2T2 Events that Provide Certain Data in JTIMS

Type of Event

FY 08 Events Q1 FY 09 Events

Total Events

No. / % with Trng Tasks or

AudienceTotal

Events

No. / with Trng Tasks or Audience

COCOM CE2T2

128 45 / 35% 25 11 / 44%

USAF Accredited

7 6 / 86%

USN Accredited

3 3 / 100%

WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009

UNCLASSIFIED 38


Analysis Topic 11b. Implementation of Joint Training Information Management System

Approved Training Assessments in JTIMS

COCOMAssessments in

JTIMSCore CMD

METs in JMETL

Core CMD JMETS Assessed in

JTIMSPercent

Assessed

AFRICOM 9 0 0%

CENTCOM 11 10 91%

EUCOM 10 10 100%

JFCOM 15 0 0%

NORTHCOM 11 11 100%

PACOM 12 0 0%

SOCOM 15 0 0%

SOUTHCOM 10 2 20%

STRATCOM 7 5 71%

TRANSCOM 6 6 100%

Totals 106 44 42%

• Ref: CJCSI 3500.01E, dated 31 May 2008, enclosure D, Joint Training Guidance, paragraph 2e• JTIMS: Joint Training Information Management System

As of 5 Jan 2009

Documents

OSD Readiness and Training CE2T2 Assessments JAEC Assessment Working Group WJTSC 09-1 23 Mar 2009