Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
1
WJTSC 10-1Master Issue Deck
O NI
SFS OF
Post WJTSC 10-1as of: 2 Apr 10
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
2
NoteTo streamline review, discussion, and resolution of issues, all open issues have been ‘binned’ to one of five categories:
1. Exercise issues2. Joint Training Requirements issues3. Joint Individual and Staff Training issues4. Joint Training Assessment and Readiness issues5. Interagency issues
While not all issues are a ‘perfect fit,’ issues were placed in the bin that represented the best fit as of the close of the previous WJTSC. Issues may be ‘re-binned’ by the Council of Colonels as appropriate.
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
3
Exercise Related
• 10-004 – National Rehearsal Program• 07-017 - Missile Warning / Defense Systems Training Capability
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
Issue 10-004: National Exercise Program (NEP) does not adequately exercise real world threat streams and adversaries. Consequently, combatant commands cannot realistically exercise their contingency plans with interagency partners if they link to the NEP. Discussion: Recent discussions indentified the requirement for a National Level Rehearsal (NLR). Domestic incident management does not incorporate threat streams and disrupt/respond options. Requirement for an exercise construct with senior whole of government integration for maximum collaboration and participation. Requirement for a senior level rehearsal program with flexibility to keep ahead of current threats. Requires exercise integration of real world threat streams on an annual basis (Example: Counterterrorism, Cyber, Weapons of Mass Destruction). Requirement to partner with interagency during development and execution of NLR. COA 1: Propose enhancement / modification of current NEP construct developing an exercise framework addressing actual overseas threats on an annual basis. COA 2: Define existing programs as a new National Rehearsal Program commensurate with NEP.Endstate: A national rehearsal program that brings together disrupt / respond options to real world threat streams in a whole of government context. POA&M: 1) Establish whole of government community of interest. 2) Establish series of in process reviews. 3) Establish Able Warrior 11 as a pilot for the NLR. 4) Conduct a senior concept development conference to discuss NLR 11. 5) Initiate discussions among senior leaders. 6) Conduct strategic level mission analysis (MA) and course of action (COA) development. OPRs: OSD(P), JS J7 and USSOCOM OCRs: Combatant Commands and Interagency partners
National Rehearsal Program
Briefer: LTC Fuller
MAR 10 JUN 10APR 10 MAR 11
Issue identified
Developconcept
brief
NLR 11 (AW 11)
pilot
AW 11 Senior level
CDC
MAY 10 JUL 10
Establish community of interest
Initial strategic level MA and
COA Dev
COA decision
2011
New Issue
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
Issue 07-017: Combatant Commanders require a distributed, integrated, synthetic Missile Warning (MW) and Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) training and exercise modeling and simulation (M&S) capability.Discussion: a. Current capability requires duplicative, static, scenario development and does not provide synergistic training capability. b. There is a requirement for a federated joint missile simulation capability which will stimulate all applicable operational missile awareness systems simultaneously to meet all stakeholders missile warning and integrated air and missile defense (IAMD) simulation requirements. Endstate: A federated Joint IAMD simulation capability which will stimulate all operational awareness systems to meet all missile warning and integrated air and missile defense simulation requirements.POA&M: Short Term: Develop a federated IAMD simulation capability that will stimulate operational missile awareness systems for the entire missile mission set to include missile warning, missile defense, and IAMD. IOC Goal: May 2011 for GLOBAL LIGHTNING (GL) 11, linked w/USEUCOM AUSTERE CHALLENGE (AC) 11. Long Term: Integrate / federate M&S capabilities from tiers 1-4 into a complete end to end MW / IAMD M&S capability 0-5 years.OPRs: USSTRATCOM / USNORTHCOM; OCRs: Missile Defense Agency, Combatant Commands and Services
MAR 08
USSTRATCOM provideupdate at WJTSC 08-1
APR 08
ITWG meets @CO Springs
MAR 10
BMDS Warfighter
Conf Update
DEC 09
Proof-of-ConceptAt JWFC
Missile Warning / Defense Systems Training Capability
GO/FO Proof of Concept
Demo
JUN 10 TBDIOC –
GL/AC 11?
Briefer: Mr McVay
COCOM J3/J7 Con Concurrence on Requirements
APR10
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
6
Joint Training Requirements
• 08-018 - Integration of ACGU Partners into Joint Training Enterprise• 09-010 - Joint Logistics Education and Training• 09-001 - Joint Training Enterprise Training M&S Gaps• 10-001 - Joint Task Force Capable Headquarters Readiness Requirements• 10-003 - Joint Exercise Transportation Program Funding• 10-005 – Update CTP Business Practices
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
Integration of ACGU Partnersinto the Joint Training Enterprise
ACGU: Australia, Canada, Great Britain, United StatesBriefer: Col Walrond
SEP 08 MAR 10
Objectives/End State Obtained;
Action Completed
ApprovedPOA&M
MAR 09
Initial ACGU WG Agreement in principle
EstablishedACGU WG
Draft ACGU Charter
Determine venue for event
coordination
Issue 08-018: The enhancement of ACGU Joint, Combined, Multilateral training in order to increase operational capability, preparedness, and improve interoperability.Discussion: No formal procedure exists for scheduling and coordinating ACGU Joint Combined and Multilateral training and use of the full range of Live Virtual Constructive (LVC) training capabilities. An ACGU working group (WG), including Combatant Commands and JS J7, needs to be established to draft agreement(s), develop business rules, and identify/develop the appropriate forum for coordination. The WG will use the PACOM-AUS Joint Combined Training Capability (JCTC) work as a starting point. Formal business rules will require a long term effort, but short term efforts will continue to leverage existing multilateral venues.Endstate: Defense level policy guidance, and agreements. A formal coordination process, business rules and/or other documents as necessary for ACGU partners and combatant commands/Services that outlines the process for scheduling and coordinating bi-lateral and multilateral training and exercises enhanced via LVC enablers using ACGU networks. Short term endstate will address OIF/OEF pre-deployment training. Long term solution expected to take several years.POA&M: - Formalize overarching vision statement and reach agreement in principle (c/w)
- Establish ACGU Working Group membership and chair (Policy/Scheduling and Technical/Systems) (c/w)
- Define ACGU training scope - Establishment of a scheduling process for the JTEN and Virtual & Constructive assets- Develop and adopt ACGU country agreements/business rules formalizing this process
OPR: USJFCOM; OCRs: USPACOM, USNORTHCOM, USEUCOM, ADF, PJHQ J7, CFD/CFEC, OSD.
Enlist OSD rep as WG member
JAN 10DEC 09OCT 09JUN 09
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
Issue 09-010: Lack of an oversight structure to support the DOD Joint logistics education and training requirements.
Discussion: In the past few years there has been a myriad of initiatives and studies that were consolidated in the Joint Logistics Education, Training, and Exercise Study (JLETES). There is no central authority providing oversight related to Joint Logistics education and training to influence the logistics learning continuum to shape the development of Joint logisticians. This shortcoming has likely resulted in duplication of efforts, lost opportunities, and reduced support to combatant command Joint logisticians and makes the implementation of the 40+ recommendations made in the JLETES more challenging.
Endstate: A validated set of Joint logistics education and training requirements.
POA&M: Formally staff the JLETES with the Joint logistics community stakeholders and provide the results to the Center for Joint and Strategic Logistics (CJSL) for assessment.
OPRs: JS J7&J4, USJFCOM J7; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, DUSD (L&MR), (CJSL)
Joint Logistics Education and Training
Briefer: Mr. Bizub
Briefed JLETES
AUG 09 MAR 10 APR 10
Established way-ahead
Staff JLETES
MAR 11Aug 10
Brief Staffing Results
Initial Requirements List
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
9
Joint Training EnterpriseTraining Modeling & Simulation Gaps
Issue 09-001: Joint Training Enterprise identified key training Modeling & Simulation (M&S) gaps which are currently unfunded.
Discussion: The Joint Training Enterprise executed a M&S Training Gap Analysis Forum (TGAF) on 16 February 2010 in order to re-validate the top training M&S gaps as directed by OSD P&R. The forum was conducted using the established Joint Training Review Group ( JTRG) technical requirement procedures. Re-validation occurred with minimal change to the prioritized issue list.
Endstate: Approval of validated M&S TGAF process and results; funding or mitigation plans to support the development of solutions that close the training M&S gaps identified by the Joint Training Enterprise.
POA&M: Joint Training Enterprise identified the M&S Gaps; USJFCOM to lead the effort of gap analysis to determine detailed estimated costs to close the gaps. Conduct detailed analysis to determine optimal solutions.
OPR: USJFCOM; OCRs: Combatant Commands; Services
NOV 08
M&S TGAF
MAR 09
Briefed top 5Training M&S
Gaps at WJTSC 09-1
AUG 09
Brief analysisat
WJTSC 09-2
Briefer: Col Walrond
FEB 2010 JUL 09
M&S TGAFVTC
M&S TGAF(Solutions Conference)
M&S TGAFVTC
MAR 2010 AUG 2010
M&S TGAF(Solutions Conference)
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
10
Joint Task Force-Capable Headquarters (JTF HQ) Readiness Requirements
Issue 10-001: Combatant commanders / combatant command Service components require clear certification authorities, requirements, and a defined process to compete for JTF HQ certification funds.
Discussion: Direction for each Combatant Commander to certify the readiness of headquarters staffs to perform as a JTF is found in 2008 UCP. Language focusing on JTF readiness requirements versus JTF certification has been proposed for inclusion in 2010 UCP. The allocation and distribution of the JTF HQ Certification CE2 funds is inconsistent across the combatant commands.
Endstate: Guidance defining combatant command JTF readiness requirements. Governance and enterprise requirements that enable consistent baseline support and the ability for combatant commands to compete for funds to address unique requirements..
POA&M: Seek national guidance defining JTF readiness requirements. Seek alternate funding, determine baseline requirements and fund distribution methodology to enable required readiness.
OPR: JS J-7; OCR: USJFCOM
DEC 09AUG 09
Issue Identified
MAR 10 JUN 10
JFCOM baseline support brief at SLT.
OCO funding availability.
Research requirements
Aug 10
Issue reset Final COCOM requirements
submitted
xxx 10
UCP approved with readiness requirements
Briefer: COL Grubich
APR 10
Draft COCOM requirements
submitted
JUL 10
Draft distribution methodology
Sep 10Fund distribution
approved by SLT
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
Issue 10-003: The appropriation designating Joint Exercise Transportation Program Funding (JETP) as one-year funds needs to be changed to two year or longer fund similar to a working capital fund.
Discussion: Present funding in one year periods creates problems with 1st Quarter and 4th Quarter exercises. The lack of funds early in the year due to a continuing resolution or process delays in distributing funds and the inherent instabilities at the end of the year (either lack of funds or lack of time to obligate) drives Combatant Commanders to heavily load exercises into the 2nd and 3rd quarters. With an increased number of exercises executing nearly simultaneously, supporting commands are limited in the support they can provide. Additionally, obligation and execution rates are impacted often delaying end of year realignment of funds within Combatant Commander Exercise and Engagement (CE2) as the enterprise waits to pay bills from heavy 3rd quarter and early 4th quarter exercise execution.
Endstate: Make JETP funding multi-year (2 year funds). This would allow units to better execute exercises throughout the fiscal year.
POA&M: Program funding change proposal must be developed and forwarded to the budget authorities for staffing and approval.
OPR: OSD(P&R); OCR: JS J-7
Joint Exercise Transportation Program Funding
MAY 10 MAR 11JUN 10 OCT 12
Funding Study
completed
Study briefed to
SLT
Legislative proposal staffed
Funding identified
Funding provided to Combatant
Commanders
JAN 11
Briefer: LtCol Livergood
SEP 10
Proposal briefed to WJTSC
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
Issue 10-005: Commercial Ticket Program (CTP) business rules and practices need to be updated to reflect the growth in program demand and highly dynamic nature of the program.
Discussion: Due to significant growth in the use of commercial airlines for exercises, accounting and management practices need to be updated to reflect a more dynamic program. What started as a $13M program to supplement military or charter airlift, has grown into a $56M program in FY09 and is now a critical component to exercise movements. The current process to build requirements, validate mode-source, build authorization messages and distribute funding is cumbersome, time consuming and not responsive to force provider needs. Often, units must cash flow tickets from Service Incremental Funding or other Operations & Maintenance funds and seek reimbursement afterward, further delaying accurate accounting of expenses. New business practices are required in order to increase the flexibility, speed, and accounting visibility of CTP funds.
Endstate: New business rules that govern roles and responsibilities for CTP authorization, notification, flow of funds, and account management.
POA&M: Two day work group 3rd week of April to produce proposed business rules and courses of action. Concept will be staffed for combatant command and Service chop. Interim guidance published as addendum to CJCSI 3511.01A prior to incorporation in CJCSI.
OPR: JS J-7 OCRs: Combatant Command J3/J4/J8, Services
Update CTP Business Practices
APR 10 AUG 10JUN 10 OCT 10JUL 10 SEP 10
Implement new
practices
2 day workgroup in Norfolk
AO level coordination
by DCO
Planner level coordination
Final coordination
Publish guidance
Briefer: LtCol Livergood New Issue
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
13
Joint Individual and Staff Training
• 08-017 - Joint Staff Officer Proficiency
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
Joint Staff Officer Proficiency
Issue 08-017: The ramp up time to achieve desired proficiency for officers reporting for joint assignment at combatant commands is too long.
Discussion: The results of the Joint Staff Officer (JSO) Study included the desired 15 core competencies for Joint Staff Officers identified by combatant command senior leadership. Lack of competency in identified areas were found to result in extended ramp up time for officers to achieve desired proficiency levels in joint staff officer tasks. Combatant commands expressed interest in the Joint Staff J-7 leading the development of Joint Staff Officer training support resources to close the identified proficiency gap.
Endstate: Establish an individual learning curriculum that leads to the reduction in time for officers to become proficient in joint staff officer duties.
POA&M: Joint Staff J-7 in coordination with the combatant commands develops joint staff officer training support resources. JS J7 leads inventory of existing courseware related to the 15 JSO competencies. Analyzes existing courseware. Designs draft JSO individual learning curriculum leveraging existing resources. Makes curriculum development decision and assigns responsibilities. Develops draft JSO curriculum and conducts Alpha and Beta tests. Integrates final JSO curriculum into combatant command training programs.
OPR: JS J-7 JETD; OCRs: Combatant Commands, National Guard Bureau
Beta Test of Handbook & Smart Cards at
Combatant Commands
SEP-DEC 09
Briefer: MAJ Coryell
Handbook & Smart Cards Finalized
Complete Curriculum Development Front-
end Analysis
JSO Curriculum Integrated in Training Programs
APR 10 AUG 11APR 10
Design JSO Curriculum
JUN 10 SEP 10-JUL 11
Curriculum DevelopmentAlpha & Beta
Tests
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
15
Joint Training Assessment and Readiness
• 06-007 - Joint Assessment – Observations, Best Practices, and Issues• 09-004 - Joint Corrective Action Process• 06-010 - Joint Lessons Learned Information System (JLLIS) • 09-005 - JTIMS and JLLIS Integration
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
Joint Assessment – Observations, Best Practices, and Issues
Issue 06-007: Consensus has not been achieved in the joint training community regarding how joint training trends and joint training assessment taskers will be achieved.
Discussion: JS J7 will develop an annual Joint assessment brief at WJTSC. CJCSI 3500.01E was updated to require monthly Task Proficiency Assessment (TPA) reporting, which will help to support the development of training trend information. CJCSI 3500.01E states it is critical to have a linkage between Joint readiness and training; DRRS requires assessments every 30 days. Therefore it is necessary for JTIMS training assessments to match DRRS 30-day readiness assessment requirements.
Endstate: Joint Training Assessments are approved in JTIMS on a monthly basis in accordance with CJCSI 3500.01E and then analyzed and briefed annually. Analysis of assessment data results in the identification of joint training / resource requirements for consideration / validation and advocacy in joint requirement / resource forums; reports to senior leadership; risk mediation forums; policy and doctrinal development; and for potential inclusion in the Chairman's Annual Joint Training Guidance and identification as a Chairman's High Interest Training Issue.
POA&M: Establish a Process Action Team/Working Group to define standardized process and select community-wide system for issue tracking and resolution (review best practices and capabilities currently implemented by commands). Develop DoD/CJCS Notice and update existing Policy, Instructions, and Manuals.
OPR: JS J-7 JETD; OCR’s: Combatant Commands, CSAs, Services
APR – AUG 09
Trend data collected and analyzed after JTIMS
v3.1 release
SEP 09
Trends briefed at WJTSC 09-2; issues linked to
JLLIS/CAP/etc
MAR 09
Select FY 08 trends binned to Working
Groups and addressed during WJTSC 09-1
Briefer: LCDR Tanner
APR 10
Establish an Assessment PAT/WG
SEP 10
Assessment data briefed at WJTSC 10-2; issues linked to JLLIS
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
Issue 09-004: Combatant Commands, Services and Combat Support Agencies (CSAs) need a joint issue resolution tracking process, supported by an automated collaboration tool within JLLIS, for tracking resolutions of joint issues generated through the JLLP.
Discussion: In Mar 09 the Joint Lessons Learned Working Group (JLLWG) voted in favor of standing up the sub-working group, the Joint Issue Resolution Working Group (JIRWG) to address this issue.
• Combatant Commands, Services and CSAs require a collaborative, transparent process to efficiently resolve issues resultant from exercises and operations.
•The Joint Lessons Learned Program (JLLP) defines issues as validated observations that require corrective action but does not provide a process for how joint issues should be resolved in a collaborative environment.
• The JLLP, to include the joint issue resolution tracking process, should support the after action processes specified in DODI 3020.47, DOD Participation in National Exercise Program (NEP).
• The proposed joint issue resolution tracking process should capitalize on and use Joint and Interagency established procedures currently in existence.
Endstate: An automated joint issue resolution tracking process integral to the JLLP and JLLIS that provides the ability to collaborate on and resolve joint issues in a transparent and efficient manner with proper authorities identified to approve and execute the recommended corrective action plan.
POA&M: Codify policies and procedures in CJCSM 3150.25, The Joint Lessons Learned Program.
OPRs: JS/J7, NORAD and USNORTHCOM/J7; OCRs: DUSD(P&R), DOD
Joint Issue Resolution Tracking Process(Joint Corrective Action Process)
WJTSC 09-1,JLLWG
Charter of JIRWG
MAR 09 APR 09
JIRWGTeleconference
MAY 09
JIRWGDCO Session
AUG 09
WJTSC 09-2JIRWG Outbrief
To WJLLWG
MAR 10
WJTSC 10-1JIRWG
OCT 09
CJCSM 3150.25Preliminary
Coordination
SEP 10
WJTSC 10-2JIRWG
JAN11
JIRWG
AUG 10
CJCSMApproved
Briefer: LCDR Tanner
MAY 10
CJCSMFinal
Coordination
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
18
Joint Lessons Learned Information System (JLLIS)
Issue 06-010: The Joint community lacks a single automated support system to discover, apply, share and research joint lessons. Discussion: The Department of Defense (DOD) Lessons Learned Community lacks a repository capability as well as the input support tools vital to effective knowledge management.
JLLIS is POM’d for FY11-15 JLLIS is being migrated from MCCLL to Fort Huachuca NLT Jul 2010. The Joint Lessons Learned Working Group uses the Configuration Review Board (CRB) process to
identify and prioritize requirements for incorporation into the JLLIS. The following have JLLIS: Combatant Commands, Services, National Guard, but not the Coast Guard;
some Combat Support Agencies (CSA); the Department of State, United States Agency for International Development and the United States Department of Agriculture; others in education community are TBD.
Endstate: Enterprise, web based, Global Information Grid (GIG) compliant JLLIS with input and management tool, with a federated/distributed database for all JLLIS stakeholders.
POA&M: JLLIS capability using an open architecture is being fielded to Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, Interagency, and other organizations; JLLIS is GIG-compliant, net-centric, web-services enabled and will be linked to other DOD systems like the Joint Doctrine, Education and Training Electronic Information System; Joint Training Information Management System, and the Defense Readiness Reporting System.
OPRs: JS J-7 JETD, OSD Policy; OCRs: DOD components
POM’D FY09
OCT 08
WJTSC11-1
MAR 11
CRB
MAR 09
JLLISMigrated toFt Huachuca
JUL 10
JLLIS MOA Terminated
JUL 09
CRB
AUG 09
JTIMSHyperlink
Established
NOV 09 SEP 10
WJTSC10-2
Briefer: LCDR Tanner
NextGeneration
JLLIS
MAY 11MAR 10
WJTSC10-1
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
19
JTIMS and JLLIS Integration
Issue 09-005: No capability exists to automatically transfer data between Joint Training Information Management System (JTIMS) and Joint Lessons Learned Information System (JLLIS).
Discussion: JTIMS Task Performance Observations (TPOs) may have joint lessons learned applicability. TPOs may identify an issue requiring joint issue resolution; per definitions of the Joint Lesson Learned Program (JLLP), final resolution of an issue would provide a lesson learned, which should be included in the joint lessons learned data base.
JLLIS observations may provide additional information to better enable the development of a Training Objective, Training Proficiency Evaluation (TPE) or Training Proficiency Assessment (TPA). DoDI 3020.47 states that each combatant command, CSA, and Military Department (Service) shall determine which performance observations should be elevated in status to a lesson learned, and that these lessons learned should be included in the JLLP through JLLIS.
Endstate: Near real-time data integration between JTIMS and JLLIS
POA&M: Nov 23, 2009, JTIMS provides capability to nominate observation & evaluation data and export to JLLIS. JLLIS to determine the requirements and develop capability to import JTIMS data.
OPR: JS J-7 JETD
NOV 09AUG 09 TBD
Briefer: LCDR Tanner
Brief phased integration process to JLLIS/JTIMS Working Groups
Deploy JTIMS v4.0 with export capability to JLLIS
Deploy JLLIS import capability of JTIMS Lessons Identified data
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
20
Interagency
• 07-001 - Integration of Interagency Partners• 10-006 - Training for Integrated Operations
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
Issue 07-001: Inadequate partner representation/environmental emulation in Combatant Command and Service training, education, exercises, and experimentation degrades the quality of these events.
Discussion: DOD recognizes the value of non-DOD partner participation in its exercises. Partner participation provides authoritative and realistic input and support to training events; however, satisfying participation requests is hampered by both interagency capacity to support and perceptions of shared objectives and value.
End State: DOD events reflect current policy and the complexity of integrated planning and operations.
POA&M: To enhance partner integration: 1. Identify and analyze participation gaps.. 2. Develop potential mitigation strategies.
OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/HD, JS J-7 JETD; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and NGB
FY 09
Implement process for FY
10/11
Initiate Process for FY 11/12
Year end assessment
DEC 09 1st Quarter FY 10
Publish Draft FY 10/11 Plan
FEB 10 FY 11
Interagency Process Effectively Supports
DoD Exercises
Integration of Interagency Partners
Briefer: Mr. Quay
Update at WJTSC 10-1
MAR 10
CompletePOA&M
FY 10
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
Issue 10-006: Current integrated operations (defined in DODD 1322.18) training and exercise strategy, planning, resourcing and implementation is not adequate to support current and future integrated operations requirements.
Discussion:
• USG recognizes that we must train together to effectively conduct integrated operations; however, lack:
- a comprehensive interagency training engagement strategy
- a common integrated operating picture
• Inadequate funding exacerbates the challenges of conducting integrated operations training.
End State: Integrated operations training events reflect USG national security objectives.
POA&M: 1. Develop a comprehensive DOD training strategy that includes a funding strategy .. 2. Press for a USG training strategy. 3. Develop a CJCSI that implements the DOD strategy. 4. Review mission essential tasks and validate with USG interagency partners. 5. Assess readiness impact of interagency participation or lack thereof. 6. Establish an Interagency Training Community of Interest Portal.
OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/P, JS J-7; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, NGB, IA Partners
FY 12
USG Training Effectively Supports Integrated Operations
Training for Integrated Operations
Complete DOD Strategy
FY11
Complete CJCSI
FY11
Review METS
FY10
Assess Readiness
Impact
FY10/11FY10
Develop TCOI Portal
Press for USG Strategy
FY11
Briefer: Mr. Quay New Issue
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
23
Closed
• 08-003 - DOD Participation Challenges in the NEP• 07-014 - Supporting Joint Training with the Joint Live Virtual Constructive
(JLVC) Federation• 04-003 - Experimentation & Testing (E&T) in Joint Training • 09-011 - Joint Task Force Capable Headquarters Readiness Requirements• 10-002 - DOD National Electromagnetic (EM) Opposing Force (OPFOR)• 08-005 - JC2 Training Management
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
24
DOD Participation Challenges in the National Exercise Program (NEP)
SEP 08 FEB 09 AUG 09
DOD ProcessCompleted
Combatant commands involved
In 5-yr NEP calendar
SEP 08 SEP 08- JUN 09
NEP 5-year Scheduling Conf
Completed
Briefer: LTC Fuller
MAR 10
Update at WJTSC 09-2
Issue 08-003: DOD Participation Challenges in the National Exercise ProgramDiscussion: a. There is higher-level involvement in the NEP, and the E&E Sub-IPC is considering changing the
frequency of National Level Exercises (NLE), Principal Level Exercises, and NEP Tier II exercises.b. 5-Year scheduling challenges in the NEP: No fidelity in future years for NEP exercises (NLE and
planning dates through 2010 and some for 2011 are established). This is discussed in interagency forums, and interagency partners understand the dilemma. However, problem still exists and JS/OSD will continue to press this issue.
Endstate: Improved joint training effectiveness and efficiency as directed by Chairman’s Joint Training Guidance. Supported / supporting roles consistent with Plans / Unified Command Plan. Staffs build relationships, conduct realistic rehearsal with actual counterparts.
POA&M: Use Worldwide Joint Training and Scheduling Conference, deconfliction and combatant command annual
exercise conferences to link multiple exercises, taking advantage of NEP to link exercises / integrate mission areas to ensure regional / mission area coverage.
Still need more fidelity on future years exercises regarding dates/themes.Support use of the National Exercise Simulation Center (NESC) (located at FEMA HQ) to provide national
level interagency exercise support and exercise control capabilities.Codify Tier III DOD submission process.OPR: JS J-7 JETD; OCRs: DHS, USNORTHCOM
NEXS Conf and 5-year schedule to DC
and approved
Update at WJTSC 10-1
Closed
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
Issue 07-014: Diminishing resources dictate the need for a cost effective solution for delivering Joint training. Currently both the JLVC Federation & Joint Theater Level Simulation (JTLS) support Joint training. A revised strategy for development & sustainment of an enterprise training capability that supports Joint training is required
Discussion: The JLVC Federation is the standard for Joint training & provides the most realistic environment to align joint training with combatant command assigned missions, requirements & constraints. The JLVC federation is comprised of both Joint & Service simulations & tools. JTLS supports the combatant command Joint Exercise Program (JEP), yet, JTLS lacks the capability to model high fidelity strategic to tactical operations. This shortfall was noted in the Joint Staff’s Training Capabilities Analysis of Alternatives Gaps 1-22. JLVC addresses these gaps. Recent cuts to Training Transformation (T2) Research, Development, Testing & Evaluation funds have driven the need for a revised strategy for development & sustainment of an enterprise training capability that can met future training requirements such as those of United States Korea Command (KORCOM). JTLS sustainment is funded (O&M) for FY10. Sustained maintenance of JTLS is required. The JLVC is funded through the FYDP with combatant command funding for event integration (CE2) & USJFCOM T2 funding for development.
Endstate: A single Joint training federation that is composable, has a low overhead competitive capability, & can meet the training requirements of Tier I – IV training audiences (including those of KORCOM).
POA&M: Develop a JLVC low cost option. Determine capabilities of JTLS needed to be incorporated into the JLVC. Develop a plan for implementing capabilities into the JLVC & conduct a business case analysis to determine cost effectiveness of the plan. Conduct front end analysis of KORCOM training requirements. Obtain needed T2 funding for JLVC development.
OPRs: USJFCOM, JS J-7; OCRs: Combatant Commands
APR 10
JTLS / JLVC transition decision
NOV 08
Training Gap
Analysis Forum
MAR 09
Develop JLVC
Low Cost options
Supporting Joint Training with the Joint Live Virtual Constructive (JLVC) Federation
Briefer: Col Tom Walrond
JAN 10
Develop plan to incorporate JTLS Rqmts
into the JLVC
POM 12
Obtain JTLS funding through FYDP
MAR 10
Business Case
Analysis of JLVC
MAY - JUL 09Front End
Analysis of KORCOM
Rqmts
SEP 09
Brief OSD on KORCOM
funding strategies
AUG 09
Submit PR11
funding Rqmts
FY11
Obtain KORCOM
funding
Combined with 09-001
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
Issue 04-003: Lack of common DOD-wide process for incorporation of EDT into joint training.
Discussion: EDT requirements call for access to joint environments. It is not always clear what training event or venue is best suited for a specific EDT event, either in content or schedule. Short-notice insertions into training events are disruptive to exercise planning. OSD is seeking to more effectively enable EDT scheduling activity within joint context and reduce possible impact to training audience and providers. For example, Joint Test and Evaluations require a joint environment for their demonstrations. Joint context and resource limitations require test and prototyping activity in training. USJFCOM has developed a clearing house function for venue identification, scheduling, and coordination (Joint Experimentation, Test and Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrations) under the direction of the T2 I-Plan. This direction will be continued under DoDI 1322.xx Implementing DoD Training as it cancels the T2 I-Plan.
Endstate: Common policy and supporting responsibilities for incorporating EDT activity in training are included in DoDI.
POA&M: OSD(P&R) developing a DoDI to transition policy from the T2 I-Plan to broader DoD-wide application and continue USJFCOM's Joint Experiments, Tests & Evaluations, and Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration role. Final coordination will occur through the formal processing of the DoDI.
OPRs: OSD(P&R) and USJFCOM J-7; OCRs: OSD (DOT&E, AT&L), JS J-7 JETCD, JS J-7 JETD, USJFCOM J-9, Combatant Commands, CSAs, Services
Experimentation, Demonstration, and Testing (EDT) in Joint Training
SEP 10SEP 08
OSD update atWJTSC 08-2;Cease efforts on CJCSM
New DODI published
Draft and staff new
DODI
FY09-FY10
Briefer: OSD Closed
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
27
Joint Task Force-Capable Headquarters (JTF HQ) Certification Criteria and Funding
Issue 09-011: Combatant commanders / combatant command Service components require clear certification authorities, requirements, and a defined process to compete for JTF HQ certification funds.
Discussion: Direction for each Combatant Commander to certify the readiness of headquarters staffs to perform as a JTF is found in 2008 UCP. Implementation of this guidance inconsistent. Clarification of intent has been proposed for inclusion in 2010 UCP. In the interim, certification requirements are dictated by the forming commander (normally a Combatant Commander). Combatant Commanders will determine what organizations within their command must be certified, and what standards will be applied to certify readiness.
Endstate: Requirements and governance that enables consistent interpretation and application of JTF HQ certification criteria, timeline, scope, and funding stream.
POA&M: Research of original requirements completed. CE2 PAT and SLT will coordinate process development with Combatant Commanders and Services.
OPR: JS J-7; OCR: USJFCOM
DEC 09AUG 09
Issue Identified
MAR 10 JUN 10
Certification Process Implemented
Research requirements
JUL 10
Proposed processbriefed at WJTSC
Combatant CommandsSubmit Funding Requirements
MAY 10
Proposed processapproved by SLT
Briefer: LTC Phlegar Updated 29 Jan 10
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
28
DOD National Electromagnetic (EM)Opposing Force (OPFOR)
Issue 10-002: Formation of a DOD National EM OPFOR Program (NEOP)Discussion: a. Joint Requirements oversight Council Memorandum (JROCM) 128-08 authorized USSTRATCOM to
provide Joint oversight of electronic warfare (EW) training DOD-wide. JROCM 177-09 approves the EW Initial Capabilities Document (ICD). JIOWC EW Directorate is directed to implement the JROCMs.
b. JROCM 177-09 / EW ICD states: “The Joint Force must train, exercise, verify and validate electronic warfare (EW) concepts and capabilities in a congested and/or contested EM environment (EME) … Specifically, DOD should create formal EW certification paths; develop valid test and operational objectives, and create robust EM OPFOR to provide feedback.”
Endstate: Improved joint training effectiveness and efficiency as directed by CJCSI 3500.01E and JROCMs. Replicate a coherent, realistic EME capable of mirroring adversary and civilian infrastructure in order to train and enhance EM capabilities, processes, and TTP proficiency across DOD and USG.
POA&M: - Establish formal process for DOD submissions to major Joint exercises. Need fidelity on future years
exercises regarding EM requirements/assets and funding.- Central “EM OPFOR clearinghouse” to provide Joint exercise integration / coordination for EM assets
and exercise control capabilities. - Use WJTSC, USJFCOM JNTC and combatant command annual exercise conferences to link multiple
exercises and integrate EM mission areas to ensure regional / mission area coverage. OPR: TBD; OCRs: Combatant Commands
AUG 09 APR 10
JFCOM JNTC &Joint IO Range
Summit
JFCOM JNTC &JIOWC EW Directorate
draft formal NEOP CONOP
WJTSCIssue Brief
JUL 09
Briefer: Mr. Winn
SEP 10
JFCOM JNTC and NEOP COI
Test CONOP at Air Wing Fallon
OCT 10
CONOP Analysis &Refinement
SEP 09
JNTC TM-3 OPFOR Summit
Closed
UN UNCLASSIFIED
O NI
SFS OF
Joint Command and Control (JC2) Training Management
Briefer: Mr. ChiaverottiIssue 08-005: No joint organization is assigned responsibility for managing JC2 training.
Discussion: Transition from Global Command and Control (GCCS) Family of Systems to future Net-Enabled JC2 systems offers opportunity for effective and efficient training delivery to individual warfighters worldwide based on a joint standards-based foundation. The future JC2 system will provide a single, joint architecture to establish a common environment for warfighters at all levels of JC2. Future JC2 system material developers will provide appropriate, re-usable, tailorable, individual technical and functional training packages for each future C2 system capability produced. The current GCCS-Joint Single Service Training Manager model doesn’t provide authority and resources to ensure future C2 system-related training packages are effective, standardized, entered into extant joint curricula, and distributed to Services and Agencies for re-use and tailoring.
Endstate: A JC2 training management organization with the necessary authority and resources, codified by a CJCSI, in-place and functioning.
POA&M: Continue (1) JSAP-M staffing of draft CJCSI 3265.02, Command and Control Training Management (revise CJCSI 6721.02B, GCCS-J Training Management) until CJCSI is signed and (2) engage warfighters at Command and Control (C2) Training Working Group (TWG) quarterly meetings.
OPR: USJFCOM J-8; OCRs: JS J-7, JS J-3
Begin AO-level Staffing
SEP 09 NOV 09
Brief C2 TWG
TM Org established
JUN 10
Brief WJTSC2010-1
MAR/APR 10 MAY 10
CJCSI signed
Brief C2
TWG
Brief C2
TWG
FEB 10
Begin Planner-level
staffing
Begin Flag-level
staffing
MAR 10
Recommend Close
