34
Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door! Dr Taj Hassan Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust & College of Emergency Medicine

Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Dr Taj Hassan Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust & College of Emergency Medicine

Page 2: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Objectives

Vision

Drivers for change

The journey & models of care

Defining & delivering quality

Problems & pitfalls

Page 3: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Drivers for change

Demand QIPP / LEAN / TQM / 6 SIGMA ‘Islands’ of excellent practice Innovation and consistency Delivering quality Expectations

Page 4: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Other bad things Winter pressures?

◦ Complexity of cases

◦ Community support ◦ Workforce issues (trainee recruitment,

consultant retention, attractiveness and sustainability)

Page 5: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Designing cost effective co-located UCC or primary care centres

Optimising ambulatory emergency care function with OUs/CDUs

Optimised resourcing for large ED centres &MTCs

Creating sustainable senior EM models of care delivery to provide breadth AND dep of cover AND team skill mix

PRESSURES FACED BY EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS

Page 6: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Developments in Emergency Medicine

Quality indicators that will reflect the key domains – safety, clinical care, system performance AND the patient experience

Increasing recognition/delivery of need to staff EDs with trained

senior decision makers – “10 EM Consultants / dept minimum” –CEM recommendations

Reconfiguration and collaborative working with others involved

in low risk urgent care within emergency care system Increased focus on optimised gatekeeping of hospital bed base

for “ambulatory care” patients

Page 7: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

The existing 4 hr ECS standard – why we need to change?

Safety

Clinical care

System performance

4hr transit through ED

performance metric

Domain Metric Quality assurance

Page 8: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Long term vision Quality Indicators in the Emergency Dept

Safety

Clinical care

System performance

Domain Metric Quality assurance

Initial assessment (pain and EWS)

Timeliness of ED care and overall Length of stay

ED consultant sign off for ‘high

risk’ presentations Summary hospital mortality Indicators

Staff surveys

Left without being seen

Unplanned re-attendance

Clinical care e.g. trauma

Clinical care, e.g. stroke

Staffing levels adhering to

national standards

Clinical staff Completion of

CEM CRM course

Patient surveys

Ambulatory emergency care

Page 9: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Ambulatory emergency care

Ambulatory emergency care is clinical care which may

include diagnosis, observation, treatment and / or linkage to

rehabilitation, following an attendance to the

Emergency Department, not requiring access to an

inhospital bed and can be provided across the

primary / secondary interface.

CEM 2010

Page 10: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

10

‘Streaming’ & ambulatory care strategies in the ED

999

GP referrals

Resuscitation

Clinical assessment

(majors) NHS Direct

Self referral

M.A.U

ITU/HDU

In-hospital bed base

The Emergency Dept

HOME

CDU / Observation Unit

Minors / ambulatory

Paediatric ED

Page 11: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Applying to AEC in the ED & Observation Medicine Units Recognise value – what does the patient really

need? What are we doing now? ( ‘current state –

visual source mapping’ CS-VSM) How can we make it better ? ( future state FS

–VSM) Implementation plan with continuous regular

review

Page 12: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Institute of Medicine (2001) – the Quality Chasm Six dimensions of health care performance: safety effectiveness patient-centeredness timeliness Efficiency equity

Page 13: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

RAND Corporation

Page 14: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Why else is it important? Clinical risk issues for Emergency Medicine.

Common claims Missed fractures 42%

Misdiagnosis 9%

Poor fracture management 7%

Nerve, tendon/ ligament injury 6%

Wound healing/FB 5%

Missed dislocation 3%

Misdiagnosis of life threatening conditions.

Acute coronary syndromes Occult head injury Sub-arachnoid haemorrhage Venous thrombo-embolic disease Suicidal risk following self harm Elderly polypathology /polypharmacy Syncope (arrhythmias) Ectopic pregnancy Abdominal aortic aneurysm

Page 15: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

15

Finding the target population for ambulatory assessment and management

Clinically stable - possible occult illness /injury with likelihood of early discharge ( 6-24hrs) – Obs Med (CDU or ED ambulatory care.

Clinically stable - Moderate / high risk of significant illness. (LOS 1-4 days) –specialty care / Acute Medicine / surgery

Clinically unstable - likely acute severe illness/injury (LOS >4days) – specialty care

Critically ill or Injured – ITU care

Increasing use of resources

Page 16: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

16

Competency defined as :

Implies integration of knowledge, skills, judgement and attitudes. Context specific Linked to professional roles Linked to process and outcome Require experience of and reflection on professional practice. Applies at any level of experience. Ongoing competence development needed due to changes in practice

Marjan Govaerts Med Educ 2008

Page 17: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Delivering quality in Emergency Medicine

Emergency assessment in certain

groups of patients with stable physiology requiring diagnostics, observation and/or treatment with a likely completed episode

<24hrs.

Consistent diagnostic work-up

and observation

Clinical decision making- based upon evidence based approach

Page 18: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Delivering ambulatory care in the ED – a ‘virtual Clinical Decision Unit’ concept

Collapse with probable ‘first fit’

Chest pain - ?PE

Chest pain - ?ACS Pneumothorax

Cellulitis

Self harm - review Limping child

Conscious sedation & MUA

COPD exacerbation Renal colic

Head injury - adult

Low risk GI bleed

?DVT assessment Asthma

Medically fit elderly requiring Community system support

Diagnostics Therapy Observation

Head injury - child

TIA

Page 19: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Limitations of running Obs Med function / ambulatory care in a Majors area

Process time issues Lack of observation facilities Access to diagnostics Consistency of pathway delivery Local resource issues Culture

Page 20: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

What does an ED based CDU provide?

A change in philosophy Focus on needs of patients who will benefit from rapid

interventions - diagnostics, therapy or short term observation and review

Being an active player in the ‘systems solution’ A new ‘paradigm’ for Emergency Medicine in the UK? Hassan TB - Clinical decision units in the emergency department: old concepts, new paradigms,

and refined gate keeping. EMJ 2003

Page 21: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Evolution and experience Accident and Emergency Services (The Platt Report) Standing Medical

Advisory Committee CHSC. London 1962 The holding area : a new arm of the ED. Tabenhaus et al, JACEP 1972:1;15-

19 The observation holding area : a prospective study. Bozien WF. JACEP

1979;8: 508-512 An evaluation of the functions of a short stay observation ward in the

A&E department. Dallos V, Mouzas G. BMJ 1981

Page 22: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Systematic reviews

Use of emergency observation and assessment wards: a systematic literature review

M W Cooke, J Higgins, P Kidd. EMJ 2003 Conclusion: All types of assessment/admission wards seem to have advantages

over traditional admission to a general hospital ward. A successful ward needs proactive management and organisation,

senior staff involvement, and access to diagnostics and is dependent on a clear set of policies in terms of admission and care.

Page 23: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Short-stay units and observation medicine: a systematic review Daly et al

Med J Aust 2003

Conclusion:

ED based Observation Units have the potential to increase patient satisfaction, reduce length of stay, improve the efficiency of emergency departments and improve cost effectiveness.

Page 24: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Observation Medicine in the ED The Healthcare System's Tincture of Time

Louis G. Graff et al American College of Emergency Medicine 2004

Page 25: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

25

‘Streaming’ & ambulatory care strategies – ED & CDU

999

GP referrals

Resuscitation

Clinical assessment

(majors) NHS Direct

Self referral

M.A.U

ITU/HDU

In-hospital bed base

The Emergency Dept

HOME

CDU / Observation Unit

Minors / ambulatory

Paediatric ED

Page 26: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Delivering ambulatory care on the CDU

Key pathways

Collapse with probable ‘first fit’

Chest pain - ?PE

Chest pain - ?ACS

Pneumothorax

Cellulitis

The CDU / OU Self harm - review

Acute headache Excl SAH

Conscious sedation Post MUA

Pneumonia

Renal colic

Head injury observation

Low risk GI bleed

?DVT assessment

Asthma

Medically fit elderly requiring Community system support

TIA

Abdominal pain

Diagnostics Therapy Observation

Page 27: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Mapping ambulatory pathways

Condition X

Initial contact & assessment ( GP, ED self referral, GP to ED or AcMed

Secondary contact Assessment – EB risk stratification or general

assessment

Diagnostics - EvidBase?, location, access, type, reporting, turnaround time, QA

Management pathway EB?, ED ambulatory, ED/CDU ambulatory,

AcMed ambulatory, OPD, inhospital admit, location, access, type,

reporting, turnaround time, QA

Governance & safety systems

Leadership &

cultural change track record

Governance & safety

Tailored informatics

Robust QI systems

Page 28: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Stages

Ensure local engagement and drive Set objectives – with end in mind Review evidence base Evaluate local resources Identify key stakeholders (clinicians, diagnostics,

commissioners) Draft the pathway Circulate & test Launch & calibrate

Page 29: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Advantages

Patient processed expeditiously Evidence based care pathways Decreased variability of practice ( Remember

RAND & IOM). True pathology identified early and admitted

appropriately. Resources utilised optimally - SAVING bed days. Minimises clinical risk of inappropriate discharge. Stable environment for audit & calibration

Page 30: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Recognising ‘value for money’ for short stay admissions & ambulatory care in EM– the business!

Good IT infrastructure

Tight process mapping of how to code & QA

Defining metrics of AEC measured in LOS of ‘hours’

rather than days

Recognising merits of AEC & short stay vs in-hospital admission

“PbR for AEC”

Regard present ‘Zero days LOS’ metric as an attribute NOT inefficiency

Page 31: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Key points

Observation Medicine & ambulatory emergency care is a vital function of main ED activity

ED Clinical Decision Units produce a significant step forward

in : ◦ Ideal platform for ambulatory emergency care ◦ ‘Gatekeeping’ the in-hospital bed base ◦ Improving safe discharge from the ED

Meets the QIPP criteria – DELIVERS what commissioners

want.

Page 32: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

‘Islands of excellence’ in AEC The future!?

Page 33: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

Designing cost effective co-located UCC or primary care centres

Optimising ambulatory emergency care function with OUs/CDUs

Optimised resourcing for large ED centres &MTCs

Creating sustainable senior EM models of care delivery to provide breadth AND dep of cover AND team skill mix

PRESSURES FACED BY EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS

Page 34: Optimised Gatekeeping for the ED – AEC at the Front Door!

‘Islands of excellence’ in AEC – delivering in the ED The future!

Tight structures on CDU / OUs

Changing cultural mindsets

Collegiate LEADERSHIP

Robust evidence based processes

Helping commissioners understand & invest in the potential of Observation

/ CDU Medicine in the ED

Good IT systems to support emergency care

Access to diagnostics

Senior decision makers & Leadership

in the ED