Upload
raja-atiq-qadir-satti
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
1/69
4 - 1 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecasting
Lectu re 3
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
2/69
4 - 2 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Learn ing Object ives
When you complete this chapter youshould be able to :
1. Understand the three time horizonsand which models apply for each use
2. Explain when to use each of the fourqualitative models
3. Apply the naive, moving average,exponential smoothing, and trendmethods
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
3/69
4 - 3 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Learn ing Object ives
When you complete this chapter youshould be able to :
4. Compute three measures of forecastaccuracy
5. Develop seasonal indices
6. Conduct a regression and correlationanalysis
7. Use a tracking signal
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
4/69
4 - 4 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
What is Forecast ing?
Process of predictinga future event
Underlying basis
of all businessdecisions
Production
Inventory Personnel
Facilities
??
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
5/69
4 - 5 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Short-range forecast Up to 1 year, generally less than 3 months
Purchasing, job scheduling, workforcelevels, job assignments, production levels
Medium-range forecast
3 months to 3 years
Sales and production planning, budgeting
Long-range forecast 3+years
New product planning, facility location,research and development
Forecast ing Time Horizons
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
6/69
4 - 6 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Dist ingu ish ing Dif ferences
Medium/long rangeforecasts deal withmore comprehensive issues and supportmanagement decisions regarding
planning and products, plants andprocesses
Short-termforecasting usually employsdifferent methodologies than longer-term
forecasting Short-termforecasts tend to be more
accurate than longer-term forecasts
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
7/69
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
8/69
4 - 8 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product L i fe Cycle
Best period to
increase market
share
R&D engineering is
critical
Practical to change
price or quality
image
Strengthen niche
Poor time to
change image,
price, or quality
Competitive costs
become critical
Defend market
position
Cost control
critical
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
Com
panyStrateg
y/Issues
Figure 2.5
Internet search engines
Sales
Drive-throughrestaurants
CD-ROMs
AnalogTVs
iPods
Boeing 787
LCD &plasma TVs
Avatars
Xbox 360
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
9/69
4 - 9 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product L i fe Cycle
Product designanddevelopmentcritical
Frequent
product andprocess designchanges
Short productionruns
High productioncosts
Limited models
Attention toquality
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
O
MS
trategy/Is
sues
Forecastingcritical
Product andprocessreliability
Competitiveproductimprovementsand options
Increase capacity
Shift towardproduct focus
Enhancedistribution
Standardization
Fewer productchanges, moreminor changes
Optimum
capacity
Increasingstability ofprocess
Long productionruns
Productimprovementand cost cutting
Little productdifferentiation
Costminimization
Overcapacity
in theindustry
Prune line toeliminateitems notreturninggood margin
Reducecapacity
Figure 2.5
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
10/69
4 - 10 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Types o f Forecasts
Economic forecasts
Address business cycleinflation rate,money supply, housing starts, etc.
Technological forecasts
Predict rate of technological progress
Impacts development of new products
Demand forecasts
Predict sales of existing products andservices
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
11/69
4 - 11 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Strateg ic Importance of
Forecast ing
Human ResourcesHiring, training,laying off workers
CapacityCapacity shortages canresult in undependable delivery, lossof customers, loss of market share
Supply Chain ManagementGoodsupplier relations and priceadvantages
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
12/69
4 - 12 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seven Steps in Forecast ing
1. Determine the use of the forecast
2. Select the items to be forecasted
3. Determine the time horizon of the
forecast
4. Select the forecasting model(s)
5. Gather the data
6. Make the forecast
7. Validate and implement results
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
13/69
4 - 13 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Realit ies!
Forecasts are seldom perfect
Most techniques assume anunderlying stability in the system
Product family and aggregatedforecasts are more accurate than
individual product forecasts
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
14/69
4 - 14 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecast ing App roaches
Used when situation is vague
and little data exist New products
New technology
Involves intuition, experience
e.g., forecasting sales onInternet
Qualitative Methods
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
15/69
4 - 15 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecast ing App roaches
Used when situation is stable and
historical data exist Existing products
Current technology
Involves mathematical techniques
e.g., forecasting sales of colortelevisions
Quantitative Methods
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
16/69
4 - 16 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Overview o f Qual i tat ive
Methods
1. Jury of executive opinion
Pool opinions of high-level experts,sometimes augment by statisticalmodels
2. Delphi method
Panel of experts, queried iteratively
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
17/69
4 - 17 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Overview o f Qual i tat ive
Methods
3. Sales force composite
Estimates from individualsalespersons are reviewed forreasonableness, then aggregated
4. Consumer Market Survey
Ask the customer
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
18/69
4 - 18 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Involves small group of high-levelexperts and managers
Group estimates demand by working
together Combines managerial experience with
statistical models
Relatively quick
Group-thinkdisadvantage
Ju ry o f Execu t ive Opinion
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
19/69
4 - 19 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Sales Force Composi te
Each salesperson projects his orher sales
Combined at district and nationallevels
Sales reps know customers wants
Tends to be overly optimistic
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
20/69
4 - 20 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Delph i Method
Iterative groupprocess,continues untilconsensus is
reached
3 types ofparticipants
Decision makers
Staff
Respondents
Staff(Administering
survey)
Decision Makers(Evaluate
responses andmake decisions)
Respondents(People who canmake valuable
judgments)
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
21/69
4 - 21 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Consumer Market Survey
Ask customers about purchasingplans
What consumers say, and whatthey actually do are often different
Sometimes difficult to answer
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
22/69
4 - 22 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Overview of Quanti tative
Approaches1. Naive approach
2. Moving averages3. Exponential
smoothing
4. Trend projection5. Linear regression
time-seriesmodels
associativemodel
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
23/69
4 - 23 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Set of evenly spaced numerical data
Obtained by observing response
variable at regular time periods Forecast based only on past values,
no other variables important
Assumes that factors influencingpast and present will continueinfluence in future
Time Series Forecast ing
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
24/69
4 - 24 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Trend
Seasonal
Cyclical
Random
Time Series Componen ts
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
25/69
4 - 25 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Components of Demand
Deman
dforproductor
service
| | | |
1 2 3 4
Time (years)
Average demandover 4 years
Trendcomponent
Actual demandline
Random variation
Figure 4.1
Seasonal peaks
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
26/69
4 - 26 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Persistent, overall upward ordownward pattern
Changes due to population,technology, age, culture, etc.
Typically several yearsduration
Trend Component
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
27/69
4 - 27 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Regular pattern of up anddown fluctuations
Due to weather, customs, etc.
Occurs within a single year
Seasonal Component
Number ofPeriod Length Seasons
Week Day 7Month Week 4-4.5Month Day 28-31Year Quarter 4Year Month 12Year Week 52
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
28/69
4 - 28 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Repeating up and down movements
Affected by business cycle,political, and economic factors
Multiple years duration
Often causal or
associativerelationships
Cyc l ical Component
0 5 10 15 20
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
29/69
4 - 29 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Erratic, unsystematic, residualfluctuations
Due to random variation or unforeseenevents
Short durationand nonrepeating
Random Component
M T W T F
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
30/69
4 - 30 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Naive Approach
Assumes demand in nextperiod is the same asdemand in most recent period
e.g., If January sales were 68, thenFebruary sales will be 68
Sometimes cost effective and
efficient Can be good starting point
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
31/69
4 - 31 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
MA is a series of arithmetic means
Used if little or no trend
Used often for smoothing
Provides overall impression of dataover time
Mov ing Average Method
Moving average =demand in previous nperiods
n
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
32/69
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
33/69
4 - 33 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Graph o f Moving Average
| | | | | | | | | | | |
J F M A M J J A S O N D
ShedSales
30
28
26
24 22
20
18
16
14
12
10
ActualSales
MovingAverageForecast
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
34/69
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
35/69
4 - 35 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
January 10
February 12
March 13
April 16May 19
June 23
July 26
Actual 3-Month Weighted
Month Shed Sales Moving Average
[(3 x 16) + (2 x 13) + (12)]/6 = 141/3
[(3 x 19) + (2 x 16) + (13)]/6 = 17
[(3 x 23) + (2 x 19) + (16)]/6 = 201/2
Weigh ted Mov ing Average
10
12
13
[(3 x 13) + (2 x 12) + (10)]/6 = 121
/6
Weights Applied Period
3 Last month
2 Two months ago
1 Three months ago
6 Sum of weights
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
36/69
4 - 36 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Increasing nsmooths the forecastbut makes it less sensitive to
changes
Do not forecast trends well
Require extensive historical data
Poten t ial Prob lems With
Moving Average
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
37/69
4 - 37 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Moving Average AndWeigh ted Mov ing Average
30
25
20
15
10
5
Salesdeman
d
| | | | | | | | | | | |
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Actualsales
Movingaverage
Weightedmovingaverage
Figure 4.2
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
38/69
4 - 38 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Form of weighted moving average
Weights decline exponentially
Most recent data weighted most
Requires smoothing constant () Ranges from 0 to 1
Subjectively chosen
Involves little record keeping of pastdata
Exponent ial Smoo thing
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
39/69
4 - 39 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing
New forecast = Last periods forecast
+ (Last periods actual demand
Last periods forecast)
Ft= Ft1+ (A t1- Ft1)
where Ft= new forecast
Ft1= previous forecast
= smoothing (or weighting)
constant (0 1)
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
40/69
4 - 40 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing
ExamplePredicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs
Actual demand = 153
Smoothing constant = .20
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
41/69
4 - 41 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing
ExamplePredicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs
Actual demand = 153
Smoothing constant = .20
New forecast = 142 + .2(153142)
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
42/69
4 - 42 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing
ExamplePredicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs
Actual demand = 153
Smoothing constant = .20
New forecast = 142 + .2(153142)
= 142 + 2.2= 144.2 144 cars
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
43/69
4 - 43 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Effect o f
Smoo th ing Constants
Weight Assigned to
Most 2nd Most 3rd Most 4th Most 5th MostRecent Recent Recent Recent RecentSmoothing Period Period Period Period PeriodConstant () (1 - ) (1 - )2 (1 - )3 (1 - )4
= .1 .1 .09 .081 .073 .066
= .5 .5 .25 .125 .063 .031
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
44/69
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
45/69
4 - 45 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Impact o f Dif feren t
225
200
175
150 | | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Quarter
Demand
= .1
Actualdemand
= .5 Chose high values of
when underlying averageis likely to change
Choose low values ofwhen underlying averageis stable
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
46/69
4 - 46 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Choos ing
The objective is to obtain the mostaccurate forecast no matter thetechnique
We generally do this by selecting themodel that gives us the lowest forecasterror
Forecast error = Actual demand - Forecast value
= A t- Ft
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
47/69
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
48/69
4 - 48 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Common Measu res o f Error
Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE)
MAPE =100|Actuali- Forecasti|/Actuali
n
n
i= 1
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
49/69
4 - 49 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Compar ison o f ForecastError
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00
2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75
4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12
5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56
6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
50/69
4 - 50 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Compar ison o f ForecastError
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00
2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75
4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12
5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56
6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62
MAD =|deviations|
n
= 82.45/8 = 10.31
For = .10
= 98.62/8 = 12.33
For = .50
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
51/69
4 - 51 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Compar ison o f ForecastError
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00
2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75
4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12
5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56
6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62
MAD 10.31 12.33
= 1,526.54/8 = 190.82
For = .10
= 1,561.91/8 = 195.24
For = .50
MSE = (forecast errors)2
n
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
52/69
4 - 52 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Compar ison o f ForecastError
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00
2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75
4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12
5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56
6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62
MAD 10.31 12.33
MSE 190.82 195.24
= 44.75/8 = 5.59%
For = .10
= 54.05/8 = 6.76%
For = .50
MAPE = 100|deviationi|/actuali
n
n
i= 1
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
53/69
4 - 53 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Compar ison o f ForecastError
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00
2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75
4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12
5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56
6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62
MAD 10.31 12.33
MSE 190.82 195.24
MAPE 5.59% 6.76%
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
54/69
4 - 54 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing w i th
Trend Adjus tmentWhen a trend is present, exponentialsmoothing must be modified
Forecastincluding (FITt) =trend
Exponentially Exponentiallysmoothed (Ft) + smoothed (Tt)forecast trend
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
55/69
4 - 55 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing w i th
Trend Adjus tment
Ft= (A t- 1) + (1 - )(Ft- 1+ Tt- 1)
Tt= b(Ft - Ft- 1) + (1 - b)Tt- 1Step 1: Compute F
t
Step 2: Compute Tt
Step 3: Calculate the forecast FITt= Ft+ Tt
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
56/69
4 - 56 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Variations In Data
1. Find average historical demand for each season
2. Compute the average demand over all seasons
3. Compute a seasonal index for each season
4. Estimate next years total demand
5. Divide this estimate of total demand by the
number of seasons, then multiply it by theseasonal index for that season
Steps in the process:
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
57/69
4 - 57 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Index Examp le
Jan 80 85 105 90 94
Feb 70 85 85 80 94
Mar 80 93 82 85 94
Apr 90 95 115 100 94May 113 125 131 123 94
Jun 110 115 120 115 94
Jul 100 102 113 105 94
Aug 88 102 110 100 94
Sept 85 90 95 90 94
Oct 77 78 85 80 94
Nov 75 72 83 80 94
Dec 82 78 80 80 94
Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
58/69
4 - 58 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Index Examp le
Jan 80 85 105 90 94
Feb 70 85 85 80 94
Mar 80 93 82 85 94
Apr 90 95 115 100 94May 113 125 131 123 94
Jun 110 115 120 115 94
Jul 100 102 113 105 94
Aug 88 102 110 100 94
Sept 85 90 95 90 94
Oct 77 78 85 80 94
Nov 75 72 83 80 94
Dec 82 78 80 80 94
Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index
0.957
Seasonal index =
Average 2007-2009 monthly demand
Average monthly demand
= 90/94 = .957
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
59/69
4 - 59 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Index Examp le
Jan 80 85 105 90 94 0.957
Feb 70 85 85 80 94 0.851
Mar 80 93 82 85 94 0.904
Apr 90 95 115 100 94 1.064May 113 125 131 123 94 1.309
Jun 110 115 120 115 94 1.223
Jul 100 102 113 105 94 1.117
Aug 88 102 110 100 94 1.064
Sept 85 90 95 90 94 0.957
Oct 77 78 85 80 94 0.851
Nov 75 72 83 80 94 0.851
Dec 82 78 80 80 94 0.851
Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
60/69
4 - 60 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Index Examp le
Jan 80 85 105 90 94 0.957
Feb 70 85 85 80 94 0.851
Mar 80 93 82 85 94 0.904
Apr 90 95 115 100 94 1.064May 113 125 131 123 94 1.309
Jun 110 115 120 115 94 1.223
Jul 100 102 113 105 94 1.117
Aug 88 102 110 100 94 1.064
Sept 85 90 95 90 94 0.957
Oct 77 78 85 80 94 0.851
Nov 75 72 83 80 94 0.851
Dec 82 78 80 80 94 0.851
Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index
Expected annual demand = 1,200
Jan x .957 = 961,200
12
Feb x .851 = 851,20012
Forecast for 2010
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
61/69
4 - 61 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Index Examp le
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70 | | | | | | | | | | | |
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Time
Demand
2010 Forecast
2009 Demand
2008 Demand
2007 Demand
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
62/69
4 - 62 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
San Diego Hosp ital
10,200
10,000
9,800
9,600
9,400
9,200
9,000 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
Month
InpatientDa
ys
9530
9551
9573
9594
9616
9637
9659
9680
9702
9724
97459766
Figure 4.6
Trend Data
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
63/69
4 - 63 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
San Diego Hosp ital
1.06
1.04
1.02
1.00
0.98
0.96
0.940.92 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
Month
In
dexforInpatientDays 1.04
1.021.01
0.99
1.031.04
1.00
0.98
0.97
0.99
0.970.96
Figure 4.7
Seasonal Indices
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
64/69
4 - 64 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
San Diego Hosp ital
10,200
10,000
9,800
9,600
9,400
9,200
9,000 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
Month
InpatientDa
ys
Figure 4.8
9911
9265
9764
9520
9691
9411
9949
9724
9542
9355
10068
9572
Combined Trend and Seasonal Forecast
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
65/69
4 - 65 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Associat ive Forecast ing
Used when changes in one or moreindependent variables can be used to predict
the changes in the dependent variable
Most common technique is linearregression analysis
We apply this technique just as we didin the time series example
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
66/69
4 - 66 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Associat ive Forecast ing
Forecasting an outcome based onpredictor variables using the least squarestechnique
y= a+ bx^
where y = computed value of the variable tobe predicted (dependent variable)
a = y-axis intercept
b = slope of the regression line
x = the independent variable though topredict the value of the dependentvariable
^
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
67/69
4 - 67 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecast ing in the Serv ice
Sector Presents unusual challenges
Special need for short term records
Needs differ greatly as function ofindustry and product
Holidays and other calendar events
Unusual events
F t F d R t t
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
68/69
4 - 68 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Fast Food Restauran tForecast
20%
15%
10%
5%
11-12 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-1012-1 2-3 4-5 6-7 8-9 10-11
(Lunchtime) (Dinnertime)
Hour of day
Percentageofsales
Figure 4.12
8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3
69/69
FedEx Call Cen ter Forecast
Figure 4 12
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Hour of dayA.M. P.M.
2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12