Opm Mba Week 3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    1/69

    4 - 1 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Forecasting

    Lectu re 3

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    2/69

    4 - 2 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Learn ing Object ives

    When you complete this chapter youshould be able to :

    1. Understand the three time horizonsand which models apply for each use

    2. Explain when to use each of the fourqualitative models

    3. Apply the naive, moving average,exponential smoothing, and trendmethods

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    3/69

    4 - 3 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Learn ing Object ives

    When you complete this chapter youshould be able to :

    4. Compute three measures of forecastaccuracy

    5. Develop seasonal indices

    6. Conduct a regression and correlationanalysis

    7. Use a tracking signal

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    4/69

    4 - 4 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    What is Forecast ing?

    Process of predictinga future event

    Underlying basis

    of all businessdecisions

    Production

    Inventory Personnel

    Facilities

    ??

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    5/69

    4 - 5 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Short-range forecast Up to 1 year, generally less than 3 months

    Purchasing, job scheduling, workforcelevels, job assignments, production levels

    Medium-range forecast

    3 months to 3 years

    Sales and production planning, budgeting

    Long-range forecast 3+years

    New product planning, facility location,research and development

    Forecast ing Time Horizons

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    6/69

    4 - 6 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Dist ingu ish ing Dif ferences

    Medium/long rangeforecasts deal withmore comprehensive issues and supportmanagement decisions regarding

    planning and products, plants andprocesses

    Short-termforecasting usually employsdifferent methodologies than longer-term

    forecasting Short-termforecasts tend to be more

    accurate than longer-term forecasts

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    7/69

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    8/69

    4 - 8 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Product L i fe Cycle

    Best period to

    increase market

    share

    R&D engineering is

    critical

    Practical to change

    price or quality

    image

    Strengthen niche

    Poor time to

    change image,

    price, or quality

    Competitive costs

    become critical

    Defend market

    position

    Cost control

    critical

    Introduction Growth Maturity Decline

    Com

    panyStrateg

    y/Issues

    Figure 2.5

    Internet search engines

    Sales

    Drive-throughrestaurants

    CD-ROMs

    AnalogTVs

    iPods

    Boeing 787

    LCD &plasma TVs

    Twitter

    Avatars

    Xbox 360

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    9/69

    4 - 9 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Product L i fe Cycle

    Product designanddevelopmentcritical

    Frequent

    product andprocess designchanges

    Short productionruns

    High productioncosts

    Limited models

    Attention toquality

    Introduction Growth Maturity Decline

    O

    MS

    trategy/Is

    sues

    Forecastingcritical

    Product andprocessreliability

    Competitiveproductimprovementsand options

    Increase capacity

    Shift towardproduct focus

    Enhancedistribution

    Standardization

    Fewer productchanges, moreminor changes

    Optimum

    capacity

    Increasingstability ofprocess

    Long productionruns

    Productimprovementand cost cutting

    Little productdifferentiation

    Costminimization

    Overcapacity

    in theindustry

    Prune line toeliminateitems notreturninggood margin

    Reducecapacity

    Figure 2.5

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    10/69

    4 - 10 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Types o f Forecasts

    Economic forecasts

    Address business cycleinflation rate,money supply, housing starts, etc.

    Technological forecasts

    Predict rate of technological progress

    Impacts development of new products

    Demand forecasts

    Predict sales of existing products andservices

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    11/69

    4 - 11 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Strateg ic Importance of

    Forecast ing

    Human ResourcesHiring, training,laying off workers

    CapacityCapacity shortages canresult in undependable delivery, lossof customers, loss of market share

    Supply Chain ManagementGoodsupplier relations and priceadvantages

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    12/69

    4 - 12 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seven Steps in Forecast ing

    1. Determine the use of the forecast

    2. Select the items to be forecasted

    3. Determine the time horizon of the

    forecast

    4. Select the forecasting model(s)

    5. Gather the data

    6. Make the forecast

    7. Validate and implement results

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    13/69

    4 - 13 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    The Realit ies!

    Forecasts are seldom perfect

    Most techniques assume anunderlying stability in the system

    Product family and aggregatedforecasts are more accurate than

    individual product forecasts

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    14/69

    4 - 14 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Forecast ing App roaches

    Used when situation is vague

    and little data exist New products

    New technology

    Involves intuition, experience

    e.g., forecasting sales onInternet

    Qualitative Methods

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    15/69

    4 - 15 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Forecast ing App roaches

    Used when situation is stable and

    historical data exist Existing products

    Current technology

    Involves mathematical techniques

    e.g., forecasting sales of colortelevisions

    Quantitative Methods

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    16/69

    4 - 16 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Overview o f Qual i tat ive

    Methods

    1. Jury of executive opinion

    Pool opinions of high-level experts,sometimes augment by statisticalmodels

    2. Delphi method

    Panel of experts, queried iteratively

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    17/69

    4 - 17 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Overview o f Qual i tat ive

    Methods

    3. Sales force composite

    Estimates from individualsalespersons are reviewed forreasonableness, then aggregated

    4. Consumer Market Survey

    Ask the customer

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    18/69

    4 - 18 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Involves small group of high-levelexperts and managers

    Group estimates demand by working

    together Combines managerial experience with

    statistical models

    Relatively quick

    Group-thinkdisadvantage

    Ju ry o f Execu t ive Opinion

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    19/69

    4 - 19 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Sales Force Composi te

    Each salesperson projects his orher sales

    Combined at district and nationallevels

    Sales reps know customers wants

    Tends to be overly optimistic

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    20/69

    4 - 20 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Delph i Method

    Iterative groupprocess,continues untilconsensus is

    reached

    3 types ofparticipants

    Decision makers

    Staff

    Respondents

    Staff(Administering

    survey)

    Decision Makers(Evaluate

    responses andmake decisions)

    Respondents(People who canmake valuable

    judgments)

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    21/69

    4 - 21 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Consumer Market Survey

    Ask customers about purchasingplans

    What consumers say, and whatthey actually do are often different

    Sometimes difficult to answer

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    22/69

    4 - 22 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Overview of Quanti tative

    Approaches1. Naive approach

    2. Moving averages3. Exponential

    smoothing

    4. Trend projection5. Linear regression

    time-seriesmodels

    associativemodel

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    23/69

    4 - 23 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Set of evenly spaced numerical data

    Obtained by observing response

    variable at regular time periods Forecast based only on past values,

    no other variables important

    Assumes that factors influencingpast and present will continueinfluence in future

    Time Series Forecast ing

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    24/69

    4 - 24 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Trend

    Seasonal

    Cyclical

    Random

    Time Series Componen ts

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    25/69

    4 - 25 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Components of Demand

    Deman

    dforproductor

    service

    | | | |

    1 2 3 4

    Time (years)

    Average demandover 4 years

    Trendcomponent

    Actual demandline

    Random variation

    Figure 4.1

    Seasonal peaks

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    26/69

    4 - 26 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Persistent, overall upward ordownward pattern

    Changes due to population,technology, age, culture, etc.

    Typically several yearsduration

    Trend Component

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    27/69

    4 - 27 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Regular pattern of up anddown fluctuations

    Due to weather, customs, etc.

    Occurs within a single year

    Seasonal Component

    Number ofPeriod Length Seasons

    Week Day 7Month Week 4-4.5Month Day 28-31Year Quarter 4Year Month 12Year Week 52

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    28/69

    4 - 28 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Repeating up and down movements

    Affected by business cycle,political, and economic factors

    Multiple years duration

    Often causal or

    associativerelationships

    Cyc l ical Component

    0 5 10 15 20

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    29/69

    4 - 29 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Erratic, unsystematic, residualfluctuations

    Due to random variation or unforeseenevents

    Short durationand nonrepeating

    Random Component

    M T W T F

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    30/69

    4 - 30 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Naive Approach

    Assumes demand in nextperiod is the same asdemand in most recent period

    e.g., If January sales were 68, thenFebruary sales will be 68

    Sometimes cost effective and

    efficient Can be good starting point

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    31/69

    4 - 31 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    MA is a series of arithmetic means

    Used if little or no trend

    Used often for smoothing

    Provides overall impression of dataover time

    Mov ing Average Method

    Moving average =demand in previous nperiods

    n

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    32/69

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    33/69

    4 - 33 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Graph o f Moving Average

    | | | | | | | | | | | |

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    ShedSales

    30

    28

    26

    24 22

    20

    18

    16

    14

    12

    10

    ActualSales

    MovingAverageForecast

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    34/69

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    35/69

    4 - 35 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    January 10

    February 12

    March 13

    April 16May 19

    June 23

    July 26

    Actual 3-Month Weighted

    Month Shed Sales Moving Average

    [(3 x 16) + (2 x 13) + (12)]/6 = 141/3

    [(3 x 19) + (2 x 16) + (13)]/6 = 17

    [(3 x 23) + (2 x 19) + (16)]/6 = 201/2

    Weigh ted Mov ing Average

    10

    12

    13

    [(3 x 13) + (2 x 12) + (10)]/6 = 121

    /6

    Weights Applied Period

    3 Last month

    2 Two months ago

    1 Three months ago

    6 Sum of weights

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    36/69

    4 - 36 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Increasing nsmooths the forecastbut makes it less sensitive to

    changes

    Do not forecast trends well

    Require extensive historical data

    Poten t ial Prob lems With

    Moving Average

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    37/69

    4 - 37 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Moving Average AndWeigh ted Mov ing Average

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    Salesdeman

    d

    | | | | | | | | | | | |

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    Actualsales

    Movingaverage

    Weightedmovingaverage

    Figure 4.2

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    38/69

    4 - 38 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Form of weighted moving average

    Weights decline exponentially

    Most recent data weighted most

    Requires smoothing constant () Ranges from 0 to 1

    Subjectively chosen

    Involves little record keeping of pastdata

    Exponent ial Smoo thing

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    39/69

    4 - 39 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing

    New forecast = Last periods forecast

    + (Last periods actual demand

    Last periods forecast)

    Ft= Ft1+ (A t1- Ft1)

    where Ft= new forecast

    Ft1= previous forecast

    = smoothing (or weighting)

    constant (0 1)

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    40/69

    4 - 40 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing

    ExamplePredicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs

    Actual demand = 153

    Smoothing constant = .20

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    41/69

    4 - 41 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing

    ExamplePredicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs

    Actual demand = 153

    Smoothing constant = .20

    New forecast = 142 + .2(153142)

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    42/69

    4 - 42 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing

    ExamplePredicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs

    Actual demand = 153

    Smoothing constant = .20

    New forecast = 142 + .2(153142)

    = 142 + 2.2= 144.2 144 cars

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    43/69

    4 - 43 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Effect o f

    Smoo th ing Constants

    Weight Assigned to

    Most 2nd Most 3rd Most 4th Most 5th MostRecent Recent Recent Recent RecentSmoothing Period Period Period Period PeriodConstant () (1 - ) (1 - )2 (1 - )3 (1 - )4

    = .1 .1 .09 .081 .073 .066

    = .5 .5 .25 .125 .063 .031

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    44/69

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    45/69

    4 - 45 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Impact o f Dif feren t

    225

    200

    175

    150 | | | | | | | | |

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    Quarter

    Demand

    = .1

    Actualdemand

    = .5 Chose high values of

    when underlying averageis likely to change

    Choose low values ofwhen underlying averageis stable

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    46/69

    4 - 46 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Choos ing

    The objective is to obtain the mostaccurate forecast no matter thetechnique

    We generally do this by selecting themodel that gives us the lowest forecasterror

    Forecast error = Actual demand - Forecast value

    = A t- Ft

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    47/69

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    48/69

    4 - 48 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Common Measu res o f Error

    Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE)

    MAPE =100|Actuali- Forecasti|/Actuali

    n

    n

    i= 1

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    49/69

    4 - 49 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Compar ison o f ForecastError

    Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation

    Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50

    1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00

    2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75

    4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12

    5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56

    6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78

    7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30

    82.45 98.62

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    50/69

    4 - 50 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Compar ison o f ForecastError

    Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation

    Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50

    1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00

    2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75

    4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12

    5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56

    6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78

    7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30

    82.45 98.62

    MAD =|deviations|

    n

    = 82.45/8 = 10.31

    For = .10

    = 98.62/8 = 12.33

    For = .50

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    51/69

    4 - 51 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Compar ison o f ForecastError

    Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation

    Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50

    1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00

    2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75

    4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12

    5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56

    6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78

    7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30

    82.45 98.62

    MAD 10.31 12.33

    = 1,526.54/8 = 190.82

    For = .10

    = 1,561.91/8 = 195.24

    For = .50

    MSE = (forecast errors)2

    n

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    52/69

    4 - 52 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Compar ison o f ForecastError

    Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation

    Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50

    1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00

    2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75

    4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12

    5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56

    6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78

    7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30

    82.45 98.62

    MAD 10.31 12.33

    MSE 190.82 195.24

    = 44.75/8 = 5.59%

    For = .10

    = 54.05/8 = 6.76%

    For = .50

    MAPE = 100|deviationi|/actuali

    n

    n

    i= 1

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    53/69

    4 - 53 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Compar ison o f ForecastError

    Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation

    Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50

    1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00

    2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75

    4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12

    5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56

    6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78

    7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30

    82.45 98.62

    MAD 10.31 12.33

    MSE 190.82 195.24

    MAPE 5.59% 6.76%

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    54/69

    4 - 54 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing w i th

    Trend Adjus tmentWhen a trend is present, exponentialsmoothing must be modified

    Forecastincluding (FITt) =trend

    Exponentially Exponentiallysmoothed (Ft) + smoothed (Tt)forecast trend

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    55/69

    4 - 55 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing w i th

    Trend Adjus tment

    Ft= (A t- 1) + (1 - )(Ft- 1+ Tt- 1)

    Tt= b(Ft - Ft- 1) + (1 - b)Tt- 1Step 1: Compute F

    t

    Step 2: Compute Tt

    Step 3: Calculate the forecast FITt= Ft+ Tt

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    56/69

    4 - 56 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seasonal Variations In Data

    1. Find average historical demand for each season

    2. Compute the average demand over all seasons

    3. Compute a seasonal index for each season

    4. Estimate next years total demand

    5. Divide this estimate of total demand by the

    number of seasons, then multiply it by theseasonal index for that season

    Steps in the process:

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    57/69

    4 - 57 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seasonal Index Examp le

    Jan 80 85 105 90 94

    Feb 70 85 85 80 94

    Mar 80 93 82 85 94

    Apr 90 95 115 100 94May 113 125 131 123 94

    Jun 110 115 120 115 94

    Jul 100 102 113 105 94

    Aug 88 102 110 100 94

    Sept 85 90 95 90 94

    Oct 77 78 85 80 94

    Nov 75 72 83 80 94

    Dec 82 78 80 80 94

    Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    58/69

    4 - 58 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seasonal Index Examp le

    Jan 80 85 105 90 94

    Feb 70 85 85 80 94

    Mar 80 93 82 85 94

    Apr 90 95 115 100 94May 113 125 131 123 94

    Jun 110 115 120 115 94

    Jul 100 102 113 105 94

    Aug 88 102 110 100 94

    Sept 85 90 95 90 94

    Oct 77 78 85 80 94

    Nov 75 72 83 80 94

    Dec 82 78 80 80 94

    Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index

    0.957

    Seasonal index =

    Average 2007-2009 monthly demand

    Average monthly demand

    = 90/94 = .957

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    59/69

    4 - 59 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seasonal Index Examp le

    Jan 80 85 105 90 94 0.957

    Feb 70 85 85 80 94 0.851

    Mar 80 93 82 85 94 0.904

    Apr 90 95 115 100 94 1.064May 113 125 131 123 94 1.309

    Jun 110 115 120 115 94 1.223

    Jul 100 102 113 105 94 1.117

    Aug 88 102 110 100 94 1.064

    Sept 85 90 95 90 94 0.957

    Oct 77 78 85 80 94 0.851

    Nov 75 72 83 80 94 0.851

    Dec 82 78 80 80 94 0.851

    Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    60/69

    4 - 60 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seasonal Index Examp le

    Jan 80 85 105 90 94 0.957

    Feb 70 85 85 80 94 0.851

    Mar 80 93 82 85 94 0.904

    Apr 90 95 115 100 94 1.064May 113 125 131 123 94 1.309

    Jun 110 115 120 115 94 1.223

    Jul 100 102 113 105 94 1.117

    Aug 88 102 110 100 94 1.064

    Sept 85 90 95 90 94 0.957

    Oct 77 78 85 80 94 0.851

    Nov 75 72 83 80 94 0.851

    Dec 82 78 80 80 94 0.851

    Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index

    Expected annual demand = 1,200

    Jan x .957 = 961,200

    12

    Feb x .851 = 851,20012

    Forecast for 2010

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    61/69

    4 - 61 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seasonal Index Examp le

    140

    130

    120

    110

    100

    90

    80

    70 | | | | | | | | | | | |

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    Time

    Demand

    2010 Forecast

    2009 Demand

    2008 Demand

    2007 Demand

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    62/69

    4 - 62 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    San Diego Hosp ital

    10,200

    10,000

    9,800

    9,600

    9,400

    9,200

    9,000 | | | | | | | | | | | |

    Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78

    Month

    InpatientDa

    ys

    9530

    9551

    9573

    9594

    9616

    9637

    9659

    9680

    9702

    9724

    97459766

    Figure 4.6

    Trend Data

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    63/69

    4 - 63 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    San Diego Hosp ital

    1.06

    1.04

    1.02

    1.00

    0.98

    0.96

    0.940.92 | | | | | | | | | | | |

    Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78

    Month

    In

    dexforInpatientDays 1.04

    1.021.01

    0.99

    1.031.04

    1.00

    0.98

    0.97

    0.99

    0.970.96

    Figure 4.7

    Seasonal Indices

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    64/69

    4 - 64 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    San Diego Hosp ital

    10,200

    10,000

    9,800

    9,600

    9,400

    9,200

    9,000 | | | | | | | | | | | |

    Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78

    Month

    InpatientDa

    ys

    Figure 4.8

    9911

    9265

    9764

    9520

    9691

    9411

    9949

    9724

    9542

    9355

    10068

    9572

    Combined Trend and Seasonal Forecast

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    65/69

    4 - 65 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Associat ive Forecast ing

    Used when changes in one or moreindependent variables can be used to predict

    the changes in the dependent variable

    Most common technique is linearregression analysis

    We apply this technique just as we didin the time series example

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    66/69

    4 - 66 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Associat ive Forecast ing

    Forecasting an outcome based onpredictor variables using the least squarestechnique

    y= a+ bx^

    where y = computed value of the variable tobe predicted (dependent variable)

    a = y-axis intercept

    b = slope of the regression line

    x = the independent variable though topredict the value of the dependentvariable

    ^

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    67/69

    4 - 67 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Forecast ing in the Serv ice

    Sector Presents unusual challenges

    Special need for short term records

    Needs differ greatly as function ofindustry and product

    Holidays and other calendar events

    Unusual events

    F t F d R t t

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    68/69

    4 - 68 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Fast Food Restauran tForecast

    20%

    15%

    10%

    5%

    11-12 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-1012-1 2-3 4-5 6-7 8-9 10-11

    (Lunchtime) (Dinnertime)

    Hour of day

    Percentageofsales

    Figure 4.12

  • 8/12/2019 Opm Mba Week 3

    69/69

    FedEx Call Cen ter Forecast

    Figure 4 12

    12%

    10%

    8%

    6%

    4%

    2%

    0%

    Hour of dayA.M. P.M.

    2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12