A Stern-Gerlach experiment with light: separating photons by spin with the methodof A. Fresnel

Oriol Arteaga,1, 2, ∗ Enric Garcia-Caurel,2 and Razvigor Ossikovski2

1Departament de Fısica Aplicada, IN2UB, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.2LPICM, Ecole Polytechnique, Universite Paris-Saclay, 91128 Palaiseau, France

(Dated: November 6, 2018)

In 1822 A. Fresnel described an experiment to separate a beam of light into its right- and left-circular polarization components using chiral interfaces. Fresnel’s experiment combined three crys-talline quartz prisms of alternating handedness to achieve a visible macroscopic separation betweenthe two circular components. Such quartz polyprisms were rather popular optical components inXIXth century but today remain as very little known optical devices. This work shows the analogybetween Fresnel’s experiment and Stern-Gerlach experiment from quantum mechanics since bothexperiments produce selective deflection of particles (photons in case of Fresnel’s method) accordingto their spin angular momentum. We have studied a historical quartz polyprism with eight chiralinterfaces producing a large spatial separation of light by spin. We have also constructed a modifiedFresnel biprism to produce smaller separations and we have illustrated the process of weak mea-surement for light. The polarimetric analysis of a Fresnel polyprism reveals that it acts as a spinangular momentum analyzer.

One of the cornerstones of quantum mechanics is theStern-Gerlach effect. In the original experiment from1922 [1] an unpolarized beam of silver atoms is passedthrough a strong magnetic field gradient and splittingit into two polarized beams. In the experiment, parti-cles with non-zero magnetic moment are deflected fromstraight path due to the magnetic field gradient. Histor-ically, this experiment was decisive in convincing physi-cists of the reality of angular-momentum quantization inatomic-scale systems.

Particle spin is a truly quantum property and cannotbe explained by classical physics. In fact, it was thediscovery of particle spin that lead to the development ofthe modern theory of quantum mechanics. The photonalso carries a quantity called spin angular momentumthat does not depend on its frequency. The spin angularmomentum of a particular photon is always either +hor −h. These two possible helicities, called right-handedand left-handed, correspond to the two possible circularpolarization states of the photon.

Because photons have no magnetic moment, they arenot affected by the gradient of the magnetic field in theStern-Gerlach apparatus, and the quantization of theirangular momentum cannot be observed with this exper-iment. In some lectures about quantum mechanics [2]an optical analog of a Stern-Gerlach experiment for pho-tons is proposed using a calcite crystal, thanks to thewell-known phenomenon of double refraction that splitsa beam of light into two orthogonally linearly polarizedbeams. This straightforward analogy is especially usefulto understand sequential Stern-Gerlach experiments thatinvolve a sequence of Stern-Gerlach apparatuses witheach one being rotated with respect to the next one, be-cause they can be explained by using the same mathe-matical model of states and measurements than that ofa sequence of calcite polarizers; i.e. essentially, by using

Malus law. However, the double refraction in calcite isnot selecting or separating light according to the intrinsicangular momentum of photons. Another notorious dif-ference is that, in the case of calcite double refraction,only one of the beams (namely, the extraordinary one) isdeflected.

This Letter studies a historical method proposed byAugustin J. Fresnel [3] to produce circularly polarizedlight by selective deflection of photons according to theirspin angular momentum and describes its analogy withthe Stern-Gerlach experiment. In a memoir presentedto the French academy of sciences in December 1822,Fresnel introduced for the first time the term circularpolarization and described a novel method to produceit. Previously, in 1817-1818 [4, 5], he had already de-scribed what we know today as the Fresnel rhomb used toconvert linearly polarized light into circularly polarizedone by means of two total internal reflections introduc-ing a 90◦ phase difference. The second method, describedby Fresnel in 1822, is much less known than the Fresnelrhomb one; it is based on the different speeds at whichright- and left-circularly polarized waves propagate in achiral medium. Specifically, Fresnel was considering nat-ural light propagating along the optic axis of α-quartz.In a bulk sample the difference in refractive indexes, aneffect today known as optical rotation or circular birefrin-gence, does not produce any physical separation of right-and left- circular polarizations but Fresnel described aningenious experiment where the chiral interfaces betweenquartz prisms of alternating handedness cause double re-fraction of circularly polarized light (CPL), thus obtain-ing a macroscopic separation between the two circularlyrefracted beams. For this experiment Fresnel used a veryacute quartz prism of angles 14◦ − 152◦ − 14◦ placed be-tween two other half-prisms of quartz of opposite hand-edness (of “opposite species” in Fresnel’s terms). This

arX

iv:1

811.

0144

1v1

[ph

ysic

s.op

tics]

4 N

ov 2

018

2

optical design, shown in Fig. 1, has been sometimesnamed as the Fresnel triprism or, more generally, Fresnelpolyprism.

Fresnel polyprisms with alternating right- and left-quartz prisms were relatively popular optical devices inthe XIXth century and, apparently, were even commer-cially available. However, they did not necessarily followthe original specifications for the prisms given by Fresnel(see Fig. 2). Nowadays, this method of producing circu-larly polarized light remains very little known –albeit itis mentioned in several books [6–8]– and, to our knowl-edge, there are no reports of any recent fabrication ofFresnel polyprisms made of quartz. There are, however,some relatively recent works that have appraised Fres-nel’s method: in 1993 an old Fresnel prism was used aspolarization interferometer to measure the circular bire-fringence of a sugar solution [9] and, in 2006, Fresnel’smethod was used to study the optical rotation of a chiralliquid by using many prismatic cuvettes [10]. Curiously,Fresnel already anticipated in his memoir that his ex-periment could be also replicated using a chiral liquidsuch as turpentine instead of quartz. He estimated thatto achieve effective separation with the materials he hadat that time it would require 40 different cuvettes withliquids of alternating handedness.

To our knowledge, the method of Fresnel, now almost200 years old, has not been brought to the attentionof investigators working on spin-controlled shaping oflight. In recent years much interest has arisen in spin-dependent splitting of beams, i.e. situations in which thephoton spin controls the propagation path and the in-tensity distribution of light, as it is considered to be afundamental constituent of future spin-based photonics.Perhaps the most studied phenomenon is the so-calledspin-Hall effect of light [11–16], which is due to the in-teraction between photon spin and its orbital motion, soit is a consequence of light carrying both spin and or-bital angular momentum. This effect is, for example,observed at a interfaces illuminated by finite size beamsthat are composed of many plane waves with slightly dif-ferent wavevectors k and having slightly different planesof incidence. It manifests as a very small spin-dependenttransverse shift upon reflection or refraction. This tinyshift is different from the more macroscopic effect dis-cussed in this Letter, as the double refraction effect forCPL proposed by Fresnel is not directly related to theorbital angular momentum of light and can be readilyexplained in the plane wave picture.

A chiral medium such a quartz crystal can be describedby the following Tellegen constitutive relations [17],

D = εE + iαH (1)

B = µH− iαTE (2)

The permittivity and optical activity tensors of quartz

have the following respective forms,

ε = diag(ε11 ε11 ε33

)(3)

and

α = diag(α11 α11 α33

)(4)

The optical activity tensor was measured spectroscopi-cally in Refs. [18, 19]. For propagation along the op-tic axis there are two forward circularly polarized eigen-modes with different refractive indexes given by

n± =√ε11 ∓ α11, (5)

where n+ and n− respectively apply to right- and left-handed circular polarizations. Note that for right-handedquartz n− > n+ because α11 is positive. The chiral pa-rameter α11 is very small (∼ 10−5) compared to the re-fractive index

√ε11. The normalized electric field eigen-

modes are written as

E± =1√2

[1 ±i

]T. (6)

For a left-handed crystal the permittivity tensor of Eq.(3) remains the same but the optical activity tensor takesopposite values, so that α11 is now negative. Therefore,the refractive indexes for right- and left-handed crytasare related as

nLH± = nRH

∓ , (7)

where the superscripts LH a RH indicate left- and right-handed crystals respectively. In the following, we omitthe superscripts LH and RH for simplicity and use aunique set of refractive indexes, namely those of a right-handed crystal. For example, if for right-handed quartzthe refractive indexes are n+ and n− for right- and left-CPL respectively, for a left handed quartz the values arereversed: right-CPL refracts with index n− and left-CPLwith n+.

Plane wave reflection and refraction at an optical inter-face can be described by Snell’s law and Fresnel relations.Because in an interface between right- and left-handedquartz there is no discontinuity of the permittivity ten-sor, one can already anticipate that reflection and refrac-tion phenomena will be mostly governed by the chiralparameter. In fact, the structure can be also regardedas a single medium with an inhomogeneous or stratifiedchirality. Notice that while in Stern-Gerlach experimentthe deflection is produced by an inhomogeneous magneticfield, here the deflection of light is produced by an inho-mogeneous chiral medium or by the interface betweentwo chiral media of same nature but of opposite hand-edness. No deflection of light can take place without thepresence of an interface.

3

FIG. 1. Double refraction in a Fresnel triprism. The incident beam is split into right (R) and Left (L) circular waves. Thedouble headed arrows inside the crystal indicate the direction of the optic axis, while R and L respectively denote a right- anda left-handed crystal. In Fresnel’s original experiment A = 76◦.

Consider the first quartz-quartz interface shown in Fig.1 between a left- a right-handed crystal. A right-handedcircularly polarized wave obeys Snell’s law,

n− sinA = n+ sinA′. (8)

As in quartz n− > n+ we can write n− = n+ + ∆where ∆ = |nR − nL| = |2α11|, therefore

sinA′

sinA= 1 +

∆

n+, (9)

The refracted angle A′ can be rewritten as A′ = A + ξwhere ξ is the small angular deviation of the beam fromthe straight path due to the optical activity of quartz.Then

sin (A+ ε)

sinA' 1 +

cosA

sinAε = 1 +

∆

n+(10)

and

|ξ| ' ∆ tanA/n. (11)

where we have written n+ ' n, n being the average re-fractive index; n = (n++n−)/2. A left-handed circularlypolarized wave will deviate by the same angle (note thatn− ' n+ ' n) but in the opposite direction.

In the second quartz-quartz interface of Fig. 1 the wavetravels from a right-handed to a left-handed crystal. If,as before, we consider a right-handed circularly polarizedwave, the Snell’s law is

n+ sin (A− |ξ|) = n− sinA′′ (12)

where we have taken into account that, due to the geom-etry of the triprism, the angle of incidence of the right-handed circular wave at this interface is A−|ξ|. Noticingthat

n+ sin (A− |ξ|) ' n+ sinA(1−∆/n) ' (n− − 2∆) sinA(13)

where in the last step we have used that n+ = n− −∆.Rewriting the refraction angle A′′ as A′′ = A−ξ′ where ξ′

FIG. 2. a, Basic experiment showing the polyprism manufac-tured by H. Soleil in its brass mount, a laser pointer and apolarizer. b, Detail of the schematics engraved on the prismmount showing the internal design with 9 individual prisms.D stands for the French “droit” (right) and G for the French“gauche” (left). c, The spots projected on the screen for a 532nm laser (left image) and a 405 nm laser (right image). In thisexperiment D = 208 cm. d, screen projection when the laserlight was pre-filtered to be right- and left-CPL respectively.

is the small angular deviation of this beam with respectto the original incident beam, we find that

|ξ′| ' 2∆ tanA/n, (14)

Finally, the beam goes through the last quartz-air inter-

4

face which can be studied by applying again Snell’s law,

n sin ξ′ = sin θ (15)

As all the involved angles are very small, nξ′ ' θ, weobtain

θ ' 2∆ tanA, (16)

If more prisms are added to the polyprism this formulacan be generalized (approximating all small angles to firstorder) to

θ ' N∆ tanA (17)

where N is the number of quartz-quartz interfaces of al-ternating handedness (in Fresnel triprism N = 2). Thetotal angular separation between the right- and left-circularly polarized beams is 2θ. In this calculationwe have assumed implicitly that light propagates alwaysalong the optic axis of quartz which, given the very smalldeflection angles, is a very reasonable approximation un-less one considers a very large number of interfaces. If, in-stead of quartz, an isotropic chiral medium is considered,there would be no limitation to the number of successiveinterfaces one could use.

If we place a detector at a distance D from the prismthen the two beams will be separated by a distance2|∆y(D)| = 2(δ + D tan θ) where δ is the small sepa-ration at the exit facet of the device. The spin splitting δat the exit of the polyprism depends on the angular devi-ation at each quartz-quartz interface and the pathlengththrough each prism. In the case of the Fresnel triprismconsidered in Fig. 1 it can be written as

δ ' L∆ tanA/n (18)

where L is the total length of the polyprism. The totaltransmitted field at each point of a detection screen canbe written as

E(x, y,D) =1√2

[A−eik−·r|−〉+A+e

ik+·r|+〉] (19)

with

k± =2πn0λ

[± sin(θ)y + cos θz] (20)

where n0 is the refractive index of the surroundingmedium (in our case, the air). The vectors |+〉 and|−〉 are normalized Jones vectors for the right- and left-circularly polarized components respectively,

|+〉 =1√2

[1 i

]T, (21)

|−〉 =1√2

[1 −i

]T. (22)

A± are the amplitudes of the two beams at the detectionpoint. As the two beams are separated along the y co-ordinate we may write A± = A0(x, y ± ∆y(D)), whereA0(x, y) can be considered as the amplitude of a Gaus-sian beam. The y component of the wavevector k± isthe only one that depends on the spin, so we may ex-plicitly refer to this component as ky and redefine it asky = k0σ sin(θ) where σ is the spin, σ = 1 for right-CPLand σ = −1 for left-CPL.

An historical Fresnel polyprism was used to study ex-perimentally Fresnel’s method to split light by the spinangular momentum. This Fresnel polyprism (Fig. 2) wasfabricated by Henri Soleil most likely between 1849 and1872 and is currently on display in the museum of theEcole Polytechnique. This polyprism is not a triprism asoriginally described in Fresnel’s memoir but rather con-tains nine different prisms of alternating handedness (i.e.eight interfaces between left- and right-handed quartz).We have found no other record of a Fresnel polyprismcomposed of such a large number of individual prisms.Despite its very old age, the polyprism seemed to be ex-ceptionally well preserved. The experiments were carriedout in the museum facilities, with the polyprism in itsoriginal mount and without any refurbishing of the op-tics. From the total length of the prism (∼ 24 cm) andthe schematic drawing graved in the mount (see Fig. 2b)we inferred that the characteristic angle A of each prismthat composes the instrument is ∼ 73◦.

Two different diode laser pointers (of respective wave-lengths 532 nm and 405 nm) were used as light sources.After having traversed the polyprism, the light was pro-jected on a screen covered with millimeter paper. Twowell separated spots of equal intensities were effectivelyobserved on the screen. We measured the separation be-tween the two spots for both laser sources and for twodifferent distances between the polyprism and the screen(D = 155 cm and D = 208 cm). As evidenced in Fig. 2c,405-nm light featured larger separation between beamsthan 532-nm light. By adding a polarizer and a ±45◦

quarter-wave plate in front of the laser we repeated theexperiment with light pre-filtered to a unique circularpolarization state and, as expected, we obtained a singleclear spot on the screen as displayed in Fig. 2d.

From the results of these experiments we could easilycalculate the deflection angle θ and compare it with thepredicted one given by Eq. (17). Table I compares thedeflection angle values from the experiment with the cal-culation of Eq. (17) assuming N = 8, A = 73◦, and thevalues of ∆ = 2α11 obtained from the dispersion formulaof α11 obtained in Ref. [18].

The analogy between Fresnel’s and Stern-Gerlach ex-periments also has a direct extension to the case of weakmeasurements. In 1988 Aharonov, Albert and Vaidman[20] suggested a modified Stern-Gerlach apparatus with areduced magnetic field to measure the spin z componentof a particle with a well-defined spin state. Because of

5

Wavelength Measured θ ∆ Calculated θ

405 nm 0.164◦ ± 0.008◦ 1.090 · 10−4 0.1633◦

532 nm 0.121◦ ± 0.007◦ 7.920 · 10−5 0.1187◦

TABLE I. Measurements of the deflection angle θ for the his-torical polyprism in Fig. 2 and comparison with the theoret-ical calculated values given by Eq. (17) for the ∆ values inRef. [18] .

the weak magnetic field (wherefrom the term “weak mea-surement”) the beams at the output are not be well sepa-rated but rather overlap. Theory showed that if a secondStern-Gerlach magnet with a strong magnetic field or-thogonal to the first one is added (so that the spin alongx is measured), the separation of the two spin compo-nents would become much larger. Soon after an opticalanalogue was proposed [21] and experimentally realized[22], by considering a coherent beam with Gaussian dis-tribution that is first pre-selected in a linearly polarizedstate and then passed through a thin birefringent crystalproducing a very small separation between the ordinaryand extraordinary rays so that the two emerging beamsoverlap. If the composite emerging beam is post-selectedwith a polarizer orthogonal to the initial polarizationstate, a much larger separation of the two orthogonallypolarized beams is observed, because the post-selectionsuppresses the overlapping part of the composite beamwhere the two orthogonally polarized rays merge. Suchoptical weak measurement amplification scheme has beenused by several authors [23–27], most notably to studyspin Hall effect that requires ∼A spatial sensitivity [11].

The weak measurement amplification method can bealso applied to Fresnel prism. The analog of a Stern-Gerlach with weak magnetic field is a Fresnel prism withfew interfaces and/or with a small angle A leading, in ac-cordance with Eq. 17, to a very small deflection angle. Inour experiment with the polyprism from Fig. 2 the sepa-ration between the two circularly polarized states was solarge that clearly no amplification is needed. Therefore,to illustrate the weak measurement amplification withinFresnel’s method we set up a new experiment that offereda much smaller beam deflection. We used a single prismof right-handed α-quartz in optical contact to another,achiral fused silica prism that can be considered as madeof isotropic material with a refractive index ∼ √ε11. Theangle A of the prism was 63◦. In this construction, shownin Fig. 3a, there is only one interface contributing to thebeam splitting, and only one of the two interfaced mediais chiral. The deflection angle is given by

θ ' ∆

2tanA. (23)

In this experiment, a camera placed at a distanceD = 95 cm was used as a detector and the 405-nm laserdiode pointer was used as a light source. A linear po-

larizer was placed in front of the biprism to pre-select aparticular spin state. At this wavelength, the expecteddeflection for this biprism is θ ∼ 0.0064◦. When the lightemerging from the biprism was directly measured by thecamera we observed the intensity pattern of the bottom-left corner of Fig. 3a. Despite the small deflection, onecan already anticipate from the image that splitting oc-curs. Note, however, that the splitting was not visible bysimple eye inspection, so that, historically, Fresnel de-signed a sequence of prisms to amplify the effect. Thebeam splitting becomes much more evident when theemerging light is post-selected by an analyzer orthogo-nal to the initial polarizer, as shown in the bottom-rightcorner of Fig. 3a. The post-selection amplifies the beamseparation but decreases the signal levels. Even if theoptical activity of quartz is strong enough to produce adeflection measurable with modern photometric methodswithout any post-selection, this measurement illustrateshow the weak measurement amplification scheme can beused in the optical Stern-Gerlach analog.

Next, we modified the experiment by adding a quarter-wave plate after the polarizer in order to illuminate thebiprism with right- and left-CPL states. With this pre-selection, all incoming photons have the same spin an-gular momentum and follow a unique trajectory throughthe biprism, so that the camera detects a single spot, asexpected (see Fig. 3b).

As a last experiment we studied the biprism in aMueller matrix polarimeter and measured the Muellermatrix associated to each one the two possible paths fol-lowed by 405-nm light in the biprism. Details of thepolarimeter used are given in Ref. [28]. To allow thepolarimeter discriminate between two very close emerg-ing light spots we placed a pinhole of 20 µm in front ofthe polarization state analyzer, at a distance of ∼ 54 cmfrom the biprism. Then we adjusted precisely the posi-tion of the pinhole to select the portion of the emerginglight that was analyzed. The normalized Mueller matri-ces measured at two slightly displaced positions of thepinhole were

M1 =

1 −0.023 0.014 0.968

0.011 −0.005 0.036 −0.012

0.012 −0.021 −0.012 −0.006

0.984 −0.006 0.012 0.992

, (24)

M2 =

1 0.015 0.001 −0.986

0.015 −0.009 0.028 −0.017

−0.016 −0.031 −0.022 −0.012

−0.971 −0.006 0.021 0.994

. (25)

It is clear that M1 and M2 correspond, within the exper-imental noise (light levels were very low due to the very

6

small pinhole), to the Mueller matrices of a right and lefthomogeneous circular polarizer respectively. Note thatthese are reciprocal forms of a circular polarizer, differentfrom the Mueller matrix of a sequence of linear polarizerand a ±45◦ quarter-wave plate most often used to gen-erate CPL. The Jones matrices corresponding to thesehomogeneous circular polarizers are

T+ =1

2

1 −i

i 1

, T− =1

2

1 i

−i 1

. (26)

Matrices T+ and T− are constructed from the outerproducts of the circular polarization Jones vectors andcan be written as

T+ = |+〉〈+| = 1

2(I + Sz), (27)

T− = |−〉〈−| = 1

2(I− Sz), (28)

where I is the 2×2 identity matrix and Sz is the Paulispin matrix

Sz =

0 −i

i 0

. (29)

Subsequent multiplication of Eq. (27) and (28) on theright by, respectively, |+〉 and |−〉 generates the eigen-value equations Sz|+〉 = |+〉 and Sz|−〉 = −|−〉, whichshow that Sz is the spin angular momentum operatorfor photons, with the two possible eigenvalues σ = ±1.Thus, the Mueller matrix measurements we have carriedout verify experimentally that Fresnel polyprisms, likeStern-Gerlach apparatus, perform spin measurement.

Although the notion of circular polarization was intro-duced by Fresnel almost 200 years ago, and for more thana century it is has been known that light possesses bothlinear and angular momenta along the direction of prop-agation, only very recently there has been exceptionalincrease in the number of publications and applicationsthat exploit the spin angular momentum of light. Thisdevelopment is strongly connected to recent advancesin nanophotonics and plasmonics, as well as to recentstudies of tiny optical spin-Hall effects caused by spin-orbit interactions. However, the more macroscopic spin-dependent deflection of light described by Fresnel hasnot yet been exploited for modern spin-dependent trans-portation phenomena. In this context, promising fieldsfor the application of Fresnel’s spin-dependent trans-portation appear to be on-chip and interchip optical cir-cuitry and optical quantum computing [29]. Therefore,Fresnel’s method could grant access to selective direc-tive and spin-sensitive addressing or to reading of guidedmodes and quantum states. More generally, the possi-bilities of Fresnel’s method as a generator or a detector

FIG. 3. Photometric analysis of the circular double refractionin a biprism. a, Basic schematics of the biprism and intensityprofiles of the transmitted beam in measurements withoutand with post-selection respectively (D = 95 cm). The post-selection was made by an analyzer orthogonal to the polarizerused for the pre-selection. b, Intensity profiles of the trans-mitted beam for pre-selection with right- and left-CPL (nopost-selection).

of circularly polarized light seem to be not yet fully ex-ploited.

In summary, we have studied an optical analog of theoriginal Stern-Gerlach experiment producing a macro-scopic separation between the spin states of a light beam.Very remarkably, Fresnel described this spin splitting ex-periment exactly one century before the actual Stern-Gerlach experiment was published.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was partially funded by Ministerio de Econo-mia y Competitividad (EUIN2017-88598) and EuropeanCommission (Polarsense, MSCA-IF-2017-793774). Au-thors are grateful to Marie-Christine Thooris and OlivierAzzona, curators of the museum of the Ecole Polytech-nique, for allowing us to use the Fresnel polyprism by H.Soleil in the experiments.

7

∗ oarteaga@ub.edu[1] W. Gerlach and O. Stern, Zeitschrift fr Physik 9, 349

(1922).[2] R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The

Feynman lectures on physics, 2nd ed. (Pearson/Addison-Wesley, 2006).

[3] A. J. Fresnel, Academie des sciences le 9 decembre 1822(1822).

[4] A. J. Fresnel, Academie des sciences le 10 novembre 1817(1817).

[5] A. J. Fresnel, Academie des sciences le 19 janvier 1818(1818).

[6] G. R. Fowles, Introduction to Modern Optics. (DoverPublications, 2012).

[7] S. F. Mason, Molecular optical activity and the chiral dis-criminations (Cambridge University Press, 2009).

[8] M. P. Silverman, Quantum superposition : counterintu-itive consequences of coherence, entanglement, and inter-ference (Springer, 2008).

[9] R. Echarri, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters6, 403 (1993).

[10] A. Ghosh and P. Fischer, Physical Review Letters 97,173002+ (2006).

[11] O. Hosten and P. Kwiat, Science 319, 787 (2008).[12] K. Y. Bliokh, F. J. Rodrıguez-Fortuno, F. Nori, and

A. V. Zayats, Nature Photonics 9, 796 (2015).[13] X. Yin, Z. Ye, J. Rho, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Science

339, 1405 (2013).[14] Y. Zhang, L. Shi, and C. Xie, Optics Letters 41, 3070+

(2016).

[15] X. Ling, X. Zhou, K. Huang, Y. Liu, C.-W. Qiu, H. Luo,and S. Wen, Reports on Progress in Physics 80, 066401+(2017).

[16] A. Aiello, N. Lindlein, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuchs,Physical Review Letters 103, 100401+ (2009).

[17] R. Ossikovski and O. Arteaga, Optics Letters 42, 3690+(2017).

[18] O. Arteaga, J. Freudenthal, and B. Kahr, Journal ofApplied Crystallography 45, 279 (2012).

[19] O. Arteaga, A. Canillas, and J. Jellison, Appl. Opt. 48,5307 (2009).

[20] Y. Aharonov, D. Z. Albert, and L. Vaidman, PhysicalReview Letters 60, 1351 (1988).

[21] I. M. Duck, P. M. Stevenson, and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Physical Review D 40, 2112 (1989).

[22] N. W. M. Ritchie, J. G. Story, and R. G. Hulet, PhysicalReview Letters 66, 1107 (1991).

[23] M. Pfeifer and P. Fischer, Optics Express 19, 16508+(2011).

[24] X. Qiu, L. Xie, X. Liu, L. Luo, Z. Zhang, and J. Du,Optics Letters 41, 4032+ (2016).

[25] K. J. Resch, Science 319, 733 (2008).[26] Y. Zhang, D. Li, Y. He, Z. Shen, and Q. He, Optics

Letters 41, 5409+ (2016).[27] L. Li, Y. Li, Y.-L. Zhang, S. Yu, C.-Y. Lu, N.-L. Liu,

J. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, Physical Review A 97 (2018).[28] O. Arteaga, J. Freudenthal, B. Wang, and B. Kahr, Ap-

plied Optics 51, 6805 (2012).[29] A. Aiello, P. Banzer, M. Neugebauer, and G. Leuchs,

Nature Photonics 9, 789 (2015).