Upload
jenna
View
24
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Session 3: Observational Data Recovery and Bias Correction Efforts. Observation B ias and O cean R eanalyses. James Carton , Gennady Chepurin, Semyon Grodsky, Tony Santorelli, and Benjamin S. Giese (TAMU) Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science University of Maryland. Motivation: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Observation Bias and Ocean Reanalyses
James Carton, Gennady Chepurin, Semyon Grodsky, Tony Santorelli, and Benjamin S. Giese (TAMU)
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic ScienceUniversity of Maryland
Session 3: Observational Data Recovery and Bias Correction Efforts
Motivation:
> Bias problems in ocean observation sets: Gouretski and Koltermann, 2007, Wijffels et al. (2008); Levitus et al. (2009); Ishii and Kimoto (2010), Gouretski and Reseghetti (2010), Giese et al. (2010)
> Problems interpretation of observations: Grodsky et al. (2008)
> Bias problems in current surface forcing data sets: Bromwich and Fogt (2004), Large and Yeager (2008)
> Model problems
1910-1919
HYDRO DATA
Wijffels et al. (2008)
BT History
1944 mechanical BT developed at WHOI
1968 Sippican gets contract to produce XBT
XBT depth = at – bt2
1980s Recorders change offering two drop-rate algorithms
1995 Production moved to MX
1996 wire coating changes; winding specifications were changed
1999 mesh added which affects the spooling of the first few meters.
Global heat content 0/700m
ORIGINAL
Discuss this later
Heat Content anal – obs
for 7 reanalyses
108Jm-2
A-O > 0
Fall Rate Formulae
Sippican Fall Rate:xbt depth = at – bt2
a=6.472 and b=0.00216
Hanawa (1994):a=6.691, b=0.00225
Hanawa data
Temp error interpreted as depth error
Temp Error
Levitus et al. 2010
Temp Error after
Levitus et al bias correction
Global heat content 0/700m
ORIGINAL
Corrected
Global heat content 0/700m
WIJFFELS ET AL. 2008, Ishii and Kimoto, 2010
LEVITUS ET AL., 2009
MEAN BIAS CORRECTION
When the observations are assimilated into SODA
Experiments
2.1.0 Hanawa
2.1.2 Levitus
2.1.4 Wijffels
<A-O>
Hanawa
Levitus et al
Wijffels et al
Too cold
Too warm
Too warm
When the observations are assimilated into SODA
1997/8 El Nino
Correcting the BTs causes a 30cm/s change in U(z=50m) and a 0.5C change in T(z=50m)
Surface drifters
Memoriam: Pearn P. Niiler 1937-2010
Surface Drifters:Velocity trend bias
Explanationsthe switch to mini-drogues? orunidentified drifters missing drogues?
Difference between MLT and SST
Surface windsPercentage of the ocean covered by the ICOADS wind observation
Wind Coverage100% means that 120 months of 2x2 deg binned data is available during a decade
Time correlation of anomalous zonal wind stress from ICOADS observations and the 20thC reanalysis for the (top) first and (bottom) second half of the 20th century
Running standard deviation of monthly anomalous zonal wind stress at the Vlissingen weather station (OBS) and from the 20thC Reanalysis (REAN). This suggests that REAN underestimates the magnitude of anomalous winds by ~50% (or 75% of variance is missing). But temporal correlation of observed and reanalysis wind anomalies is high, ~0.9.
1910-50 1951-00
TCORR 0.87 0.93
TREGR 0.53 0.51
Summary• Much recent attention has been devoted to identifying bias in the BT
archive, discussed in two recent workshops. Ocean reanalysis offers an approach complementary to XBT-CTD comparisons.
• SST is generally interpreted as MLT. In fact the two are systematically different in ways that need to be clarified.
• Surface drifters have an unrealistic trend. Unraveling the cause and removing the trend requires returning to the original data, an effort underway at AOML (Lumpkin). Possible cause: unidentified undrogued drifters.
• ICOADS comparisons to the 20CR offers a way to examine the accuracy of the surface winds.