November 20, 2013

The ChronicleT h e i n d e p e n d e n T d a i ly aT d u k e u n i v e r s i T y

xxxxxday, mmmm xx, 2013 ONE HUNdREd aNd EIGHTH yEaR, IssUE xxxwww.dukechronicle.com

Graduate school Health and Science

FUqUa GRad dIscUssEs NEw bOOkPage 4

cEINT REcEIvEs $15 mIllION GRaNT FOR REsEaRcHPage 2

The ChronicleT h e i n d e p e n d e n T d a i ly aT d u k e u n i v e r s i T y

wEdNEsday, NOvEmbER 20, 2013 ONE HUNdREd aNd NINTH yEaR, IssUE 54www.dukechronicle.com

Every WednesdayIn the Chronicle.Duke Graduate School Coverage. don’t miss your chance to study it.

Duke Dining expands vegan repertoire

Locopops stores close due to shifting business demandsby Jen ChenThe ChroniCle

The locopops stores in raleigh and Chapel hill are out of business.

Summer Bicknell, the owner of locopops, said the venues closed oct. 27 because many customers are no longer inter-ested in visiting the brick and mortar stores. The venue in Durham remains unaffected, though it will be closed for the holiday season from mid-December to mid-January.

“Customer feedback tells me that folks increasingly want to

enjoy locopops during festivals, farmers markets, ball games, etc. and they want the convenience of grabbing a pop or pint while they’re shopping for other items or getting a coffee,” Bicknell wrote in a statement. “They’re less and less likely to make a special trip for one item. This trend prompted me to explore new delivery models.”

Bicknell added that locopops plans to have more carts and kiosks at events and popular venues, where the consumer de-mand is higher.

“This change will free up resources so i can explore a mo-

bile option so we can take our frozen treats on the road,” the statement read.

Bicknell wrote in an email Tuesday that the flagship Dur-ham store, which opened in 2005, will always be open as long as locopops exists.

She declined to comment on the financial situation of the Durham store and whether the closing of the raleigh and Cha-pel hill locations was due to financial hardship.

by Jenna ZhangThe ChroniCle

Duke’s research Scholars Program, which con-nects undergraduate students to research mentors, has drawn both high praise and criticism from its partici-pants.

Currently in its fourth semester, the research Schol-ars Program selects 20 undergraduates each year from a pool of nearly 200 applicants and matches them with mentors—professors or graduate students, mostly in the sciences. Students in the program participate in lab research and assist mentors with their projects over the course of a semester. At the end of the program, they may choose to continue with their project or move on to other labs and fields of research. Despite the oppor-tunities provided through the program, poor matches and lackluster work have left certain mentees wanting.

“Basically, the goal of rSP is to look at students who are motivated and eager to get into wet lab research and connect them with mentors who have expressed an interest in taking on undergraduates,” said junior Akhil Sharma, rSP administrator and a former partici-pant. “We try to build a relationship where both the mentor is happy, and the student is learning.”

Since its establishment in 2011, the program has drawn polarized reactions from its participants—with some scholars lauding the program and other schol-ars expressing dissatisfaction. Still others claimed the middle ground and described their experiences as un-exceptional, but useful for getting into other labs.

Research Scholars Program receives mixed reviews

See ReseaRch, page 5

by Kali ShulklapperThe ChroniCle

Duke Dining is continuing to expand its vegan op-tions on campus in light of student concern over ac-cessibility.

Duke Dining executive Chef Joseph Dowe expressed that although it is difficult to provide adequate vegan options for people representing a variety of eating pref-

erences, he said he plans to continuously experiment with certain foods and then offer the successful dishes more consistently in Penn Pavillion. For example, this month’s Chef’s Chatter Series at the Marketplace and Penn Pavillion offered a variety of sample vegan dishes by Dowe and fellow chef Joe laPorte.

See Vegan, page 12

rinzin dorjee/the chronicle

Duke Dining tries to acccommodate dietary restrictions by increasing vegan options following student concern.

See Locopops, page 12

2 | WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2013 www.dukechronicle.com The Chronicle

Females ages 16 or older who have never had an eating disorder or eating disorder symptoms (e.g., binge eating, severe dieting) are needed for a study of the course of eating patterns. This is a longitudinal study with data collection at 3 time points across a year’s time; thus, research study participation will last about 1 year.

RESEARCH VOLUNTEERS NEEDED

Monetary compensation will be provided for completing this study, run by Dr. Anna Bardone-Cone of the Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. For more information please call 919-843-0974 or email us at [email protected]

www.rredstudy.org

by Zaynah AlamThe ChroniCle

The Center for environmental impli-cations of nanoTechnology has secured a $15 million grant renewal to continue its research.

Spanning several disciplines and six institutions with its headquarters at Pratt School of engineering, CeinT will use its renewed endowment—a joint grant from the national Science Foundation and the U.S. environmental Protection Agency—to continue studying the potential hazards of small particles on organisms and ecosys-tems in a rapidly evolving modern world. The five-year-old CienT has received this grant before, said Jie liu, a CeinT inves-tigator and George Barth Gellar professor of chemistry.

“it’s a very important task to under-stand how nanomaterials will impact the environment,” liu said. “We all know that nanomaterials are becoming more useful in many areas, and how that will impact the environment is not well studied. Duke has a very strong theme to study the envi-ronmental impact of these materials.”

The center was founded in 2008 by CeinT Director Mark Wiesner, James l. Meriam professor of civil and environ-mental engineering, and Deputy Director Gregory lowry, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University, which is part of the cen-ter. CienT has been using top-of-the-line technology to apply basic science research to the study of the environmental implica-tions of nanotechnology, executive Direc-tor Christine hendren noted.

The center, which explores a variety of interdisciplinary topics, will begin to hone in on the issue of organisms coming in contact with certain nanomaterials and the effect on the environment.

“There’s a lot of work going on about what the hazards are of what nanomateri-als might do to organisms and what the possible exposure of nanomaterials might do to organisms in ecosystems,” Wiesner said. “The gap between those two is the area of biouptake—once you’re swimming around in it, will it take it up?”

The center’s focus on the translation of basic science into the research of environ-mental risk assessment initially won the center its first joint grant from the ePA and nSF at the time of its foundation.

“We have a lot of expertise in complex environmental interactions—we’re look-ing at an environmentally relevant and re-alistic scenario,” hendren said.

CeinT conducts ecological nanoma-terials research through the use of its mesocosm facility, which consists of test chambers that can replicate the natural environmental conditions of the wetlands in a controllable, experimental setting.

“in the environment, you start getting factors you don’t actually think about, like sunlight or small bacteria or fungi inside the water,” liu said. “The mesocosm facil-ity is very important for the center. We’re not just testing in the lab, and the results from the lab and the mesocosm are very different, sometimes the opposite.”

While each research team in the cen-ter will continue its individual research project with its allocated grant money, the center as a whole hopes to further explore the various effects and hazards of nanoma-terials on the environment in the years to come.

“in the second arch of the funding in the next five years, we’re going to get much more detailed and focused on the complexities involved and get more into what is required to measure concentra-tions and biouptake,” hendren said. “We really hope to grow in some of the areas related to this.”

NanoTech center receives funds to continue research

BY THeNUMBeRS

$15 millionGrant received to continue research at the CEINT

6Number of instiutions that CEINT collaborates with

ThaNh-ha NGuyEN/ThE ChroNIClE

Photographer Evgenia Arbugaeva spoke about her experiences documenting mammoth hunters in Artic Russia, Monday.

Hunting Mammoths

The Chronicle www.dukechronicle.com WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2013 | 3

Menu SamplingOld School Veggie Burrito $2.86 Regular Chicken Burrito $5.65Cheese Quesadilla $1.41Chicken Quesadilla $3.59Veggie Nachos $4.12Chips & Salsa $2.06

1920 1/2 Perry St. at Ninth Street Just a block from East Campus

Now served at JB’s hot dog stand.

HO

ME

TO

WN

HE

RO

!

comsic burritothe

Pedestrian critically hit on LaSalle

by Staff ReportsThe ChroniCle

The north Carolina State Bureau of inves-tigation is investigating a death that occurred under Durham Police Department custody, ac-cording to a statement released by Police Chief Jose lopez.

Jesus huerta, 17, of Durham, died shortly before 3 a.m. while being transported to Po-lice headquarters by Durham police officer Samuel Duncan, who was going to pick up a warrant charging huerta with second degree trespassing, the statement said.

When Duncan arrived at police headquar-ters, a loud noise was heard in the car and he jumped from the vehicle. huerta was in the back seat of the patrol car, which rolled into a van before coming to a stop.

The cause of death has not yet been de-termined, and the body has been delivered to the state medical examiner’s office for an autopsy. The police department asked the SBi to investigate the case, which is standard procedure for an in-custody death. The death is also being investigated by the department’s Professional Standards Division and homi-cide Unit.

Duncan, who has been an officer with the Durham Police Department since July 2011, is on leave with pay, which is also standard procedure.

“i want to reassure the community that this incident is being thoroughly and completely investigated in an effort to determine exactly what happened,” lopez said in the statement.

Police explore the death of detained teen

XIruI lIu/ThE ChroNIClE

A panel Tuesday discussed misconceptions about North Korea and its nuclear program.

Experts in the fi eld

@dukechronicle

by Staff ReportsThe ChroniCle

A pedestrian was struck in a traffic crash on north laSalle St. late Monday evening.

At approximately 11:20 p.m., a male victim was crossing the street and was hit by a vehicle. he was then transported to a hospital with life-threatening condi-tions. A release from the Durham Watch Commander said that Durham police are investigating the crash.

Police did not provide any further information on Monday night. Watch Commander lieutenant Daniel edwards said at 4:30 p.m. Tuesday that no further information was known by police. The subject had not been identified and his status in the hospital was also unknown.


Enjoy ExEcutivE club MEMbErship at DurhaM’s FavoritE DEstination

You’re invited to experience our award-winning hotel, fine dining and the Duke University Golf Course—with all the special benefits

of Executive Club Membership:

Complimentary Room Nights & 20% Savings on SuitesSavings in Fairview Dining Room, Vista Restaurant & Bull Durham Bar

Exclusive Meeting & Banquet Benefits • Special Club EventsSavings on Golf at One of NC’s “Top Ten” Courses

choose from two options: classic membership for individuals, or platinum membership for families, corporations,

clubs and organizations

Contact Danielle Kaspar, Executive Club Manager919.313.9604 • [email protected] or enroll at washingtondukeinn.com

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter

Publication: The Chronicle Size: 6.625” x 5.125” Job Number: 864-3031Run Date: October 9, 2013 Dana Communications 609.466.9187

3001 Cameron Boulevard, durham, nC 27705 800.443.3853 • 919.490.0999 washingtondukeinn.Com

Q&A

Naresh Vissa, Fuqua ‘12, recently pub-lished a book titled “everything You need to Know About the Duke Fuqua MMS: A Guide of Memoirs for Applicants and Students.” Half of the book’s profits will be donated to the Fuqua School of Business. The Chronicle’s Emma Baccellieri sat down with Vissa to discuss the new publication.

The Chronicle: What inspired you to write the book?

Naresh Vissa: While i was a student, i received several inquiries from interna-tional students who wanted to apply to the MMS program, and i also received several inquiries from students who at-tended my undergraduate institution, which was Syracuse University.... Be-cause so many people were reaching out to me, people obviously had questions and the best way to answer these ques-tions was to write a book—to really ex-plain what Fuqua is like, what the MMS is like, how the professors are, what stu-dent life is like, what Duke is like and Durham—to have the entire picture for these students and to give access to this

Fuqua graduate discusses recent book on the business school

SPeciAl to the chronicle

Naresh Vissa graduated from Fuqua in 2012 and has recently published a book about the business school.

high-quality information at a relatively cheap price.

TC: is there a part of the book you think readers might find particularly interesting?

NV: not only does it have good infor-mation about the application process—most of the questions that i’ve been getting from the applicants have been about what is the admissions interview like, what will i need to prepare—but i think the most beneficial part of the book actually targets current students, as well. i have several chapters devoted to interviewing, getting a job, what in-dustries to look at when you’re looking for jobs, how to be more entrepreneur-ial. The benefit of these chapters is that they draw specific questions for anyone, it doesn’t even have to be an MMS stu-dent—it can be any Duke student, it can be any student around the world—i ad-dress these questions.

TC: is the book intended to be more for applicants or for students, or geared

towards these audiences equally?NV: The first part of the book is dedi-

cated to the application process, so that includes who to look for when you’re getting a recommendation but the oth-er half is geared more towards students, the current MMS students who are look-ing for jobs or are wondering what they are going to do with their lives... A lot of a students are a little confused as to what they want to do professionally. it’s really half and half, i think both appli-cants and current students will find it pretty beneficial.

TC: Why did you decide to donate half of the proceeds to Fuqua through Duke Forward?

NV: i knew when i was writing this that it wasn’t going to set any best-selling records. Donating made sense because i’m basically writing about my experiences as a Fuqua student and tell-ing people about Duke, about Durham, about Fuqua. it made sense to give back to Fuqua because of what Fuqua gave me.

gRaDUaTe COVeRage


kitchen open late Sun - WedS 11AM to 2AMthurS - SAt 11AM to 3AM

We deliver to Med center buildingS

20% off With Med center id for dine in

nearDuke

Heights LaSalle500 South LaSalle St, Durham • 877-505-2426

Duke Manor311 South LaSalle Street, Durham • 919-383-6683

heightslasalle.com

www.gscapts.com

noW oPen! come tour the newest apartment community in town! the heights at South laSalle luxury rental community is located 1 mile from campus.

Walk or bike to duke University. newly renovated interiors. huge fi tness center and sauna. 2 Sparkling swimming pools. Specials for students and University personnel.

Lenox East & West100 Mayfi eld Circle, Durham • 866-688-3507

ticonproperties.com

one bedroom apartments and two or three bedroom townhomes. townhomes include fi replace, built-in bookshelves, attic/outdoor storage, and a breakfast nook off the kitchen. just 4 miles to duke.

South Terrace at Auburn801 E. Woodcroft Parkway, Durham • 919-450-0080

jupitercommunities.com

the comfort and convenience you deserve with amenities including a sparkling swimming pool, sundeck, 24-hour fi tness center, playground and beautiful outdoor area with BBQ grills and pond views.

near

duke

.com

HOUSING

Holly Hill2716 Campus Walk Avenue, Durham • 919-383-3830

http://www.hollyhillapartmenthomes.com

We offer one,two and three bedroom apartments. We’re within walking distance of West Campus & Duke Hospital, and we are on the DATA bus line. Closely located to a variety of retail and restaurants.

Students’ complaints have ranged from research interest mismatch during the initial selection process to dissatis-faction with the work they were given during the course of the program.

“i didn’t list cell biology at all, but i got put into a cell biology lab,” said sophomore Kevin Do who participated in the program this year. “i got really lucky. What if i was unlucky and i hated cell biology?”

The program sends student appli-cations to professors and graduate stu-dents who have expressed interest in becoming mentors. Based on an appli-cant’s strengths, experience and inter-ests, the mentors then choose four to six students to interview and ultimately select one or two with whom to collabo-rate. Through the interview process, the research Scholars Program hopes to maximize student-mentor compatibility.

Approximately 12 or 13 mentors working in a variety of fields offer to par-ticipate in the program each year. on the program application, however, there are 18 fields of interest listed. As a re-sult, students often end up working in fields of research in which they are not sufficiently interested. one scholar ma-joring in biomedical engineering ended up working in a psychology lab, while anowwther scholar who had expressed an interest in cell biology was put into an evolutionary biology lab.

Sharma noted that there was a lack of mentors available and said that the pro-gram was trying to increase the variety of fields participants can explore through rSP.

“A lot of times, you see a lot of inter-est by students in terms of say, i want to do biology research or i want to do research in medicine,” he said. “But we can’t obviously offer everybody a spot in those areas, unless we have enough mentors. So a problem we’ve had is a lot of students applying for research in the same fields, and we’re only able to ac-commodate a few of them.”

Participants often did not know that they had the option of expressing mis-match dissatisfaction to program ad-ministrators without losing their spot in the program. Sharma added that even though the program would try to find

a better match for these students, there was no guarantee that they would be ac-commodated.

other students have expressed dissat-isfaction regarding the type of work they were given during the program, describ-ing it as “monotonous” or “menial”.

“For me, going into the lab dur-ing the rSP, it felt like a chore, and i hated that,” sophomore Keizra Mecklai said. “it taught me that i didn’t like re-search because i thought it was a chore. it didn’t feel like i had any ownership.”

in response to these complaints, Do criticized other program participants for not being more proactive and put-ting more outside time into their re-search.

“one of the big differences is willing-ness to read outside,” he said. “i mean, as undergrads, you probably don’t know the specialty your [principal investiga-tor] works in. if you don’t mind do-ing boring stuff all day, that’s great. if you’re interested in doing high level science, then you have to be willing to read outside, and i feel like a lot of peo-ple aren’t doing that.”

rSP administrator emma Fridel, a se-nior, said that many of the tasks which some scholars perceived as tedious are an ordinary part of every lab.

“Your Pi washes dishes,” she said. “At the end of the day, somebody is going to have to do the menial work, and if you’re not doing it, your mentor’s do-ing it.”

Despite the criticism it has drawn from certain participants, rSP has also garnered praise.

“i highly recommend the program,” said senior Melissa Day who still works in the lab she was matched with through rSP.

Many of those who expressed mixed or negative reactions to the program recommended it as a launchpad for evaluating interests or finding positions in better-suited labs. After the program, scholars who did not continue in their assigned labs said they found it easier to get lab work in other fields with some lab experience on their resumes.

“A lot of us weren’t working in stuff we’d have chosen,” sophomore Kaustav Shah said. “But it’s still a good experi-ence, working in a lab. it’s good for all of us to get our feet wet.”

RESEARCH from page 1


$845

$580

Poplar Manor

Holly Hill

on duke

bus line

pet

friendly

lease:

6 or 12

months

1, 2, & 3

bedroom

spacious

apartments

laundry

facilities

water

included

Something for Everyone Something for Everyone

919.383.3830 2716-D Campus Walk Ave., Durham, 27705 Hours: Mon-Fri 9-5

Less than 1 mile to Duke’s West Campus and Medical Center

Erwin Terrace

hollyhillapartmenthomes.com

poplarmanorapartments.com

erwinterraceapartments.com

nearDukenearne

ardu

ke.co

m

HOUSING

NOW OPEN1 & 2 BEDROOM APARTMENTSCALL TODAY TO SCHEDULE A TOUR!

888.698.8793 HEIGHTSLASALLE.COM

BRAND NEW

500 South LaSalle Street, Durham, NC 27705


sports

THE BLUE ZONE

BEHIND ENEMY LINES: WAKE FORESTsports.chronicleblogs.com

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2013 www.dukechroniclesports.com

SportsThe Chronicle

Storm that field, baby

Those fans loyal enough to stick around for the end of Saturday’s game against Miami got to experience the most awe-inspiring event in all of

sports—storming a college football fi eld.

Up 48-30 with just four min-utes to play, the Blue Devils kicked off to the Hurricanes, and fans started their descent to the the wall, anticipating the postgame charge. Miami

turned the ball over on downs with less than a minute left to play, and Duke sup-porters located where they would jump over the wall onto the fi eld. The announcer reminded the crowd several times that only “authorized person-nel” are allowed on the fi eld after the game.

Yeah, right.Anthony Boone took a knee and the clock start-

ed to tick down toward zero. The cheerleaders got out of the way, and armed policemen stood beside yellow-clad security guards facing a daunting task. Those brave souls charged with keeping fans off the fi eld looked as outnumbered as the Spartans in 300 but without the resolve to hold back the tidal wave of Blue Devil faithful. The fi nal seconds ran of the clock, and a thousand newly “authorized personnel” went over the wall and rushed onto the fi eld. The celebration was on.

No one really knows what to do once they are on the fi eld. The team rushes towards each other at the 50-yard line, and everyone else follows. State troopers encircle Coach Cutcliffe like he is the

See ON FOOTBALL, page 8

MATTHEW CICANESE/THE CHRONICLE

Graduate student Andre Dawkins, along with teammates Jabari Parker and Rodney Hood, gave the crowd at Camer-on Indoor Stadium a healthy dose of slam dunks Tuesday.

Entertainment guaranteedMEN’S BASKETBALL

A Monday-night game against UNC-Asheville: A pithy student crowd shows up to a 91-55 Duke blowout.

The very next day, the Blue Devils play again. This time, the opponent is East Carolina. Section 17 appears nearly as empty as the day before, except there is plenty of Pirate purple sprinkled in.

“In warm-ups you can see it,” Quinn Cook says. “If you can see the brown, you can see the bleach-ers— something’s going on.”

Duke hits its fi rst 11 shots, and another rout appears in order. But then it isn’t. The Pirates storm back

and bring the game within one, only to fall short 83-74.“It was a heck of a basketball game,” head coach

Mike Krzyzewski said. “I wish that more people could have attended.”

Part of the emptiness is to blame on the Preseason NIT. Both days, the pair of games was considered a sin-gle-admission doubleheader, and each school was given an area to sell tickets to their fans. The single-admission part essentially guarantees some empty areas because

fans from the schools not playing aren’t necessarily going to watch the other game. It happens in tourna-ments all the time. East Carolina’s allotted area was in Section 17, explaining why it appeared even emptier during Monday’s Duke game and purpler Tuesday.

The bigger problem, though: The schools couldn’t sell their allotment of tickets, and Duke was only in-formed about this Sunday, said Mike Cragg, senior associate director of athletics for operations. Usually, Duke can fi gure out how many students will come to a game and when it won’t be full. That’s when they sell tickets to Section 17.

“We can anticipate these nights,” Cragg said. “But we couldn’t do anything about it.”

Duke tried to give away the tickets for free, but the Preseason NIT didn’t allow them to, Cragg said. As Krzyzewski said after the game, the seating arrange-ment at the Preseason NIT “stinks” because it “ruined the atmosphere of Cameron.”

Students, though, could have continued to come. They weren’t being turned away. Any stu-

See BEATON, page 8

Parker and the Durham Dunk Co. always put a show on in Cameron

NOT SO EASY

THANH-HA NGYUEN/THE CHRONICLE

After freshman Jabari Parker and the Blue Devils opened the game hitting 11 straight shots and built an 18-point lead, East Carolina fought back to draw within one in the final minutes.

by Ryan HoergerTHE CHRONICLE

East Carolina overcame a 17-point defi cit with less than 10 minutes remaining to beat Norfolk State Monday night. Tuesday, the Pirates spotted Duke an 18-point lead then nearly came all the way back to stun the Blue Devils.

Playing in front of another below-capacity crowd at Cameron Indoor Stadium, the No. 6 Blue Devils survived

Blue Devils deny late comeback push from East Carolina

a scare from the upstart Pirates, 83-74, to advance to next week’s semifi nals of the NIT Season Tip-Off. Duke was powered by 30 points from Rodney Hood and 21 from Jabari Parker.

“They came back last night, they’re used to doing that,” Hood said. “They’re playing with free money, they’re play-ing on our home court. No pressure on them, all the pres-sure on us.”

The Blue Devils (4-1) came out on fi re, hitting their

See M. BASKETBALL, page 9

Andrew Beaton

Zac ElderOn Football


sports

8 | WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2013 www.dukechroniclesports.com The Chronicle The Chronicle www.dukechroniclesports.com WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2013 | 9

ACROSS

1 Creator of Fearless Fosdick

7 “This is bad”

11 Word part: Abbr.

14 Kind of pork on a Chinese menu

15 What’s to eat

16 Cedar Rapids college

17 Blow away singer Johnny?

19 National Dog Day mo.

20 Navigational aid

21 Name on some euros

22 Mountain goat’s perch

23 Boars?

27 “In the end the pressure got to me”

30 Bluffer’s words

31 What may precede one

32 “You wish!”

33 Sounds of relief

35 Call it quits … with a hint to 17-, 23-, 48- and 56-Across

40 Western treaty grp.

41 First Chinese dynasty

42 Inspiration for a “Jackass” stunt, maybe

43 “No acting up!”45 Ticked off48 Sala?50 Salt Lake City

athletes51 Zwei cubed52 Bub55 “Jeez Louise!”56 Toddler raised on

chocolate?60 Slip-___ (some

shoes)61 Removal from

harm’s way, for short

62 Hotelier Helmsley and others

63 Hwy.64 Warrior princess

of TV

65 J.F.K.’s W.W. II craft

DOWN 1 Like most car

radios 2 Showgirl in

the song “Copacabana”

3 Many a city dwelling

4 Volcano on Kyushu

5 Telephone system hacker

6 Rock that may float

7 End of a lame pickup line

8 “You wish!” 9 Med. scan10 Cry that may

accompany fist-pumping

11 Frightens off12 Words on a

20-Across at a mall

13 Hosiery brand that sponsored women-only 10K races

18 Biogenesis scandal nickname

22 Hellenic X23 U2’s frontman24 Shore dinner

entree25 Indy racer

Luyendyk26 Ex-president

who swore in President Hoover

27 Digging, so to speak

28 One sharing living space

29 Practical smarts32 One-time link

34 Anchorage-to-Nome racer

36 “Hang on a sec!”

37 Currently airs

38 Spiders’ nests

39 Lamar who married a Kardashian

44 Navigational aid, for short

45 Angel or enemy preceder

46 Totally useless47 “Give me a sec”48 Bookstore

section49 First to stab

Caesar52 Ranchero’s hand53 Simple quatrain

form

54 Dermatologist’s concern

56 Put the whammy on

57 Time to revel

58 Sought office

59 Go for apples

PUZZLE BY SAMUEL A. DONALDSON

For answers, call 1-900-285-5656, $1.49 a minute; or, with a credit card, 1-800-814-5554.Annual subscriptions are available for the best of Sunday crosswords from the last 50 years: 1-888-7-ACROSS.AT&T users: Text NYTX to 386 to download puzzles, or visit nytimes.com/mobilexword for more information.Online subscriptions: Today’s puzzle and more than 2,000 past puzzles, nytimes.com/crosswords ($39.95 a year).Share tips: nytimes.com/wordplay. Crosswords for young solvers: nytimes.com/learning/xwords.

ANSWER TO PREVIOUS PUZZLE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

14 15 16

17 18 19

20 21 22

23 24 25 26

27 28 29 30

31 32 33 34

35 36 37 38 39

40 41 42

43 44 45 46 47

48 49

50 51 52 53 54

55 56 57 58 59

60 61 62

63 64 65

G R U B A I L S J I H A DL I S A K N E E O N O N EA T M S I F A T S T A T EM A C I N T O S H H E X E D

L I A R C U RT O X I C M E C H A N I CA D A S H N R A G L OM I C K E Y M O U S E C L U BP U T E E K N A O M I

M O C C A S I N T R O P EH U H U S E S

S E D E R M U C K R A K E RE V I C T E L L E L O V EG E E K S A N E W E K E DA N T S Y D A I S S O L O

The New York Times Syndication Sales Corporation620 Eighth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10018

For Information Call: 1-800-972-3550For Release Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Edited by Will Shortz No. 1016Crossword

The ChronicleFavorite slam dunk style:

360-reverse: �� duranddurandOver-a-cute-little-kid : ��Mr� TeethHoney Dip: �� PunSuperman: ��mouseTomahawk:��djinisinabottleNo-look: �� theheadlineguyKiss-the-rim: ��Thanh-lolOff-the-backboard windmill: �� Mr� JortsBarb Starbuck: ��Barb

Student Advertising Manager: ��James Sinclair

Account Representatives: �� Jennifer Bahadur, Shannon Beckham

Peter Chapin, Caitlin Chase, Courtney Clower, Alyssa Coughenour

Tyler Deane-Krantz, Chris Geary, Liz Lash, Hannah Long, Parker Masselink

Nic Meiring, Brian Paskas, Nick Philip, Cliff Simmons, Lexy Steinhilber, Olivia Wax

Creative Services Student Manager: �� Marcela Heywood

Creative Services: ��Allison Eisen, Mao HuRita Lo, Izzy Xu

Business Office ��Susanna Booth

HELP WANTED

A cAsuAl cAfe on the Duke University Medical Campus is seeking a part

time barista to work in a fun atmosphere� Our employees are dependable, hospitality

focused and friendly� Will train� Shifts include 6:30am - 2pm and

10am-4pm� Get paid weekly plus tips daily� Free parking�

Discounted meals� Great Customers� Email qualifications and experience to Chef Shawn

at iacatering@netscape�net

TRAVEL/VACATION

BAHAMAs sPRING BReAK

$189 for 5 Days� All prices in-clude: Round-trip luxury par-ty cruise� Accommodations on the island at your choice of thirteen resorts� Appalachia Travel� www�BahamaSun�com 800-867-5018

CLASSIFIEDS

Find the answers to the Sudoku puzzle on the classifieds page

Fill in the grid so that every

row, every column and

every 3x3 box contains

the digits 1 through 9.

(No number is repeated in

any column, row or box.)The

Chronicleclassified

advertising

www.duke-chronicle.com/

classifieds

ratesAll advertising - $6�00 for first 15

words, 10¢ (per day) additional per word

3 or 4 consecutive insertions - 10 % off

5 or more consecutive insertions - 20 % off

deadline12:00 noon 1 business day

prior to publication

Books for sale?

Need a place to live?

Got a car to replace?

Need a ride home?

Chronicle Classifieds,

your on-campus site

to find a job, buy,

sell, trade,

find a place

for spring break

and much more...

dukechronicle.com/classifieds

President of the United States, and general pandemonium sets in. Some people take pictures, some tear up the turf to take home as a souvenir and some brave souls might even go for the goalpost to tear it down—a tradition that colleges have put a stop to for safety reasons. Something akin to a rave starts up in the middle of the field, as fans swarm the players, jump-ing up and down and slapping them on the helmets and shoulder pads.

There is nothing as exciting as pouring over that wall and stream-ing onto the field with friends and strangers alike, everyone caught up in the excitement and bonded together by a common sense of euphoria. Duke fans have been lucky enough to participate in this unique celebration two years in a row.

Last year’s game against North Carolina was the first time in a long time Blue Devil fans got to storm the field. The showdown with the Tar Heels ended in dramatic fash-ion. Jamison Crowder caught the game-winning touchdown pass with just seconds left, and the crowd took to the field in celebration of Dukes’ first bowl berth since 1994.

After the dust settles, a lot of people will say that they were the first one on the field following the victory. I am one of those people. After Crowder scored, I ran down to the front of the student section and took my place in the first row. As my legs dangled over the wall waiting to jump, a security guard politely asked me to use the stairs to access the field once the game finished. I don’t know if he was required to say that, or if he was just naïve. Either way, using the stairs never even crossed my mind, or anyone else’s. Where’s the fun in calmly storming the field?

After last year’s experience, people were ready this year. As the game came to a close Saturday, fans knew exactly what was about to happen

and exactly how to do it. And it was a beautiful sight, watching everyone come together to celebrate the victo-ry. For the second year in a row, the Blue Devils last home game ended in the best way imaginable.

In typical Duke football fashion, some students left the game after halftime to get ready for their Saturday night out, even though the Blue Devils went into the locker room with the lead. Some fans even left after the third quar-ter with Duke up by one. Those poor unfortunate souls missed out.

When I was 15 years old, I went to watch Kentucky play No. 1 LSU in Lexington, my hometown. The Wildcats knocked off the undefeat-ed Tigers in three overtimes, and Kentucky fans stormed the field and tore down the goal posts. Although my dad probably would have let me go onto the field, I didn’t. I stayed in my seat and watched one of the coolest things I’ve ever seen in sports. But to this day, my biggest regret as a football fan is that I didn’t take to the field that night.

I told myself I would never make that mistake again.

Thankfully, Duke has given me two opportunities to repent for my sin. I will be a senior next year, and I might never get another opportunity to storm a football field.

I can live with that. Thanks to the incredible seasons the Blue Devils have put together the past two years, I will remember for the rest of my life the times I got to go over the wall and onto the field at Wallace Wade Stadium like a Civil War solider rush-ing into battle.

At the N.C. State game two weeks ago I heard chants of “football school” coming from the home crowd in Wallace Wade. Saturday I chanted it along with most of the stadium. We may not be a “football school” for a long time, or ever, but the Blue Devils gave us a chance to celebrate like it Saturday, and that’s good enough for me.

first 11 shots from the floor and sprinting out to an early 21-7 lead. Duke’s first miss came with just more than 11 minutes re-maining in the first half.

Point guard Quinn Cook led the offen-sive barrage, finishing the opening period with 11 points and seven assists, but it was where his teammates were catching his passes that enabled them to have success. Twenty-eight of Duke’s 43 first-half points came in the paint. Parker was the main beneficiary of Cook’s passing, pouring in 12 first-half points on 6-of-8 shooting, nearly all of which came inside the key.

“They were going man, so we have scor-ers and guys that can make plays when they get in the lane. And then they went zone and kind of stood us up,” said Cook, who finished with 14 points and 10 assists. “We gutted it out at the end, and we need-ed this learning experience.”

The hot shooting did not last. Duke made just 16 of its last 46 shots, includ-ing plenty of looks around the rim. The vaunted 3-point assault was also lacking, as the Blue Devils were just 5-for-14 over-all from downtown.

“When we did get close to the bucket, we couldn’t finish the play tonight,” head coach Mike Krzyzewski said. “And then all of a sudden, [the Pirates] stay in there, and they’re playing really well, and there’s an incredible amount of game pressure. You can cut it with a knife. And I’m proud of my guys, we responded.”

Although East Carolina (4-1) never held a lead, there were times Tuesday when Duke’s nonconference home win-ning streak, which now stands at 105, ap-

peared in jeopardy. After falling behind 41-23, the Pirates stayed within striking dis-tance, trailing 43-32 at halftime, thanks in large part to nine offensive rebounds. East Carolina scored 14 second-chance points in the first half—Duke had none.

Early in the second half, the Pirates cut the Duke lead to 50-44, utilizing dribble penetration from point guard Prince Williams to set up open looks for teammate Akeem Richmond, who drilled three 3-pointers on the night. It wasn’t just Richmond who hurt the Blue Devils—four Pirates reached dou-ble-digit points.

What had been a well-oiled Duke offen-sive machine in the first half was anything but for most of the second period. Park-er was suddenly out of sorts, making just one of his first seven shots in the second half. At times, Hood seemed to be the only Blue Devil capable of solving the Pirates’ 2-3 zone, scoring nine of Duke’s first 14 points in the half.

“We were playing tight, as far as passing around the perimeter,” Hood said. “Me and Jabari took it upon ourselves to get in the middle and get to the basket. We got a couple fouls, got in the 1-and-1 and hit our free throws.... Once we got in the middle, good things happened.”

The Duke lead was whittled all the way down to 64-63 after two free throws by Williams with 6:59 remaining. Two plays later, Parker followed by hitting two from the line as well, but then missed a spectacular would-be alley-oop, creating another East Carolina fast break that led to more free throws.

But then Parker made the play of the game. He dribbled the length of the floor,

navigating through the entire Pirate squad, and elevated for a one-handed flush, send-ing the Cameron Crazies into an uproar and giving Duke a five-point lead.

“Jabari’s play full-court really kind of broke the ice for us,” Krzyzewski said. “It was like a statement play. It made all of our guys respond better. We’ve all been in situations where for moments we’re not as confident about something that you’d normally do in a confident manner. And you need to break through it. Our guys were able to break through it while they were playing, instead of talking about it afterwards after congratulating East Caro-lina on a win.”

Still East Carolina would not go away. A pair of jumpers by Paris Roberts-Camp-

bell kept the Pirates within five with under three minutes to play. But two blocks by Parker on the same Pirate possession gave the Blue Devils the stop they badly need-ed, and Hood converted the opportunity into two free throws to pad Duke’s lead and close out the game.

After struggling from the charity stripe in a 94-83 loss against Kansas Nov. 12 in the Champions Classic, the Blue Devils hit their foul shots down the stretch Tuesday night, going 19-for-24 in the second half.

“We practice [free throws] more, but you’ve got to be careful not to talk too much about it because you don’t want it to become ‘a thing,’” Krzyzewski said. “Some-times when you lose a game like that… it hurts, so you shoot a lot more.”

BEATON from page 7 M. BAskETBAll from page 7ON FOOTBAll from page 7

Matthew CiCanese/The ChroniCle

Redshirt sophomore Rodney Hood droped a career-high 30 points Tuesday, helping the Blue Devils hold on against a resilient Pirate squad.

dent who showed up before game time would’ve been allowed in. Any student who wanted to watch Duke dribble out the clock after a thrilling second half probably could’ve walked in for just that final moment.

Perhaps it was because students have midterms, Cragg said, and that Duke is amid a stretch of three home games in five days. There was the epic football game Saturday too. That’s a lot for even the most dedicated Blue Devil fans. And then there are other reasons that are common sense: Sometimes it’s nice to watch a game in high-definition on a couch with a beer and a laptop.

But go watch this team in person. This isn’t to blame students—I’ve spent plen-ty of games watching on a couch. And I’ve never bought the argument that any athletic team, professional or amateur, “deserves” fans. This argument has been made with practically every non-revenue sport, football and women’s basketball over the years. It usually sounds some-thing like, “Fans should go because the team is good and deserves the support of its peers.”

I don’t want to blame people for not going as if they’ve done something wrong. I just want to say: If you’re not watching this team in person, you’re missing out.

There is something so incredibly fun about this year’s team that doesn’t quite translate to television, even with surround sound and a 60-inch 1080p flat screen.

This is the type of team fans dream about. Not fans of Duke, fans of the sport.

A team that runs and guns, pumps fists and bumps chests, and dunks and dunks again. It’s a real-life video game.

Jabari Parker dunked the ball four times against East Carolina. One was an alley-oop from Cook that sent the fans—those that were there—berserk. On anoth-er, he dribbled the full length of the floor through four Pirate defenders and sent it home with ease as if he were playing alone on the Central Campus courts. There was almost a fifth—another alley-oop from Cook—that might have been the best slam in program history if Parker were able to successfully put it down with his mighty right arm that stretched out like Michael Jordan’s at the end of Space Jam. There will be plenty of time to watch Parker on TV next year, when he’s most likely playing in the NBA. What Parker, Rodney Hood and the rest of the Blue Devils are doing right here and now on Coach K Court isn’t the same on TV.

Whether the game is a blowout, like against UNC-Asheville, or a nail-biter, like against East Carolina, entertainment is guaranteed. If it’s a blowout, just enjoy the Durham Dunk Co. put on a highlight reel with ease. If it’s a good game, enjoy that. You’ll get some awesome dunks too.

The price of admission to Club Cam-eron is free, and the show is unlike any other in recent memory. Just ask any student who was there because with all the excitement this team generated, the noise at the end made it seem like the stands were packed.

“I felt like it was regular Cameron in here,” Cook said. “The fans who came did great.”


The Chronicle Our favorite fonts:

Myriad Bold: �� LayoutTextile: �� CE2Marigold: �� WatchdogGoudy: �� Editpage LayoutHobo:�� SportsBodoni: ��Photo, Sports PhotoCooper Black: �� OnlineBell Gothic: ��WireBarb Starbuck: ��Barb









In Kakuro you must place the digits 1 to 9 into a grid of

squares so that each horizontal or vertical run of white squares

adds up to the clue printed either to the left of or above the

run. Numbers below a diagonal line give

the total of the white squares below;

numbers to the right of a diagonal line give the total of the white squares to the right.

Find the answers to the Kakuo puzzle on the classifieds page

sports

8 | WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2013 www.dukechroniclesports.com The Chronicle The Chronicle www.dukechroniclesports.com WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2013 | 9

ACROSS

1 Creator of Fearless Fosdick

7 “This is bad”

11 Word part: Abbr.

14 Kind of pork on a Chinese menu

15 What’s to eat

16 Cedar Rapids college

17 Blow away singer Johnny?

19 National Dog Day mo.

20 Navigational aid

21 Name on some euros

22 Mountain goat’s perch

23 Boars?

27 “In the end the pressure got to me”

30 Bluffer’s words

31 What may precede one

32 “You wish!”

33 Sounds of relief

35 Call it quits … with a hint to 17-, 23-, 48- and 56-Across

40 Western treaty grp.

41 First Chinese dynasty

42 Inspiration for a “Jackass” stunt, maybe

43 “No acting up!”45 Ticked off48 Sala?50 Salt Lake City

athletes51 Zwei cubed52 Bub55 “Jeez Louise!”56 Toddler raised on

chocolate?60 Slip-___ (some

shoes)61 Removal from

harm’s way, for short

62 Hotelier Helmsley and others

63 Hwy.64 Warrior princess

of TV

65 J.F.K.’s W.W. II craft

DOWN 1 Like most car

radios 2 Showgirl in

the song “Copacabana”

3 Many a city dwelling

4 Volcano on Kyushu

5 Telephone system hacker

6 Rock that may float

7 End of a lame pickup line

8 “You wish!” 9 Med. scan10 Cry that may

accompany fist-pumping

11 Frightens off12 Words on a

20-Across at a mall

13 Hosiery brand that sponsored women-only 10K races

18 Biogenesis scandal nickname

22 Hellenic X23 U2’s frontman24 Shore dinner

entree25 Indy racer

Luyendyk26 Ex-president

who swore in President Hoover

27 Digging, so to speak

28 One sharing living space

29 Practical smarts32 One-time link

34 Anchorage-to-Nome racer

36 “Hang on a sec!”

37 Currently airs

38 Spiders’ nests

39 Lamar who married a Kardashian

44 Navigational aid, for short

45 Angel or enemy preceder

46 Totally useless47 “Give me a sec”48 Bookstore

section49 First to stab

Caesar52 Ranchero’s hand53 Simple quatrain

form

54 Dermatologist’s concern

56 Put the whammy on

57 Time to revel

58 Sought office

59 Go for apples

PUZZLE BY SAMUEL A. DONALDSON

For answers, call 1-900-285-5656, $1.49 a minute; or, with a credit card, 1-800-814-5554.Annual subscriptions are available for the best of Sunday crosswords from the last 50 years: 1-888-7-ACROSS.AT&T users: Text NYTX to 386 to download puzzles, or visit nytimes.com/mobilexword for more information.Online subscriptions: Today’s puzzle and more than 2,000 past puzzles, nytimes.com/crosswords ($39.95 a year).Share tips: nytimes.com/wordplay. Crosswords for young solvers: nytimes.com/learning/xwords.

ANSWER TO PREVIOUS PUZZLE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

14 15 16

17 18 19

20 21 22

23 24 25 26

27 28 29 30

31 32 33 34

35 36 37 38 39

40 41 42

43 44 45 46 47

48 49

50 51 52 53 54

55 56 57 58 59

60 61 62

63 64 65

G R U B A I L S J I H A DL I S A K N E E O N O N EA T M S I F A T S T A T EM A C I N T O S H H E X E D

L I A R C U RT O X I C M E C H A N I CA D A S H N R A G L OM I C K E Y M O U S E C L U BP U T E E K N A O M I

M O C C A S I N T R O P EH U H U S E S

S E D E R M U C K R A K E RE V I C T E L L E L O V EG E E K S A N E W E K E DA N T S Y D A I S S O L O

The New York Times Syndication Sales Corporation620 Eighth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10018

For Information Call: 1-800-972-3550For Release Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Edited by Will Shortz No. 1016Crossword

The ChronicleFavorite slam dunk style:

360-reverse: �� duranddurandOver-a-cute-little-kid : ��Mr� TeethHoney Dip: �� PunSuperman: ��mouseTomahawk:��djinisinabottleNo-look: �� theheadlineguyKiss-the-rim: ��Thanh-lolOff-the-backboard windmill: �� Mr� JortsBarb Starbuck: ��Barb









HELP WANTED

A cAsuAl cAfe on the Duke University Medical Campus is seeking a part

time barista to work in a fun atmosphere� Our employees are dependable, hospitality

focused and friendly� Will train� Shifts include 6:30am - 2pm and

10am-4pm� Get paid weekly plus tips daily� Free parking�

Discounted meals� Great Customers� Email qualifications and experience to Chef Shawn

at iacatering@netscape�net

TRAVEL/VACATION

BAHAMAs sPRING BReAK

$189 for 5 Days� All prices in-clude: Round-trip luxury par-ty cruise� Accommodations on the island at your choice of thirteen resorts� Appalachia Travel� www�BahamaSun�com 800-867-5018

CLASSIFIEDS

Find the answers to the Sudoku puzzle on the classifieds page

Fill in the grid so that every

row, every column and

every 3x3 box contains

the digits 1 through 9.

(No number is repeated in

any column, row or box.)The

Chronicleclassified

advertising

www.duke-chronicle.com/

classifieds

ratesAll advertising - $6�00 for first 15

words, 10¢ (per day) additional per word

3 or 4 consecutive insertions - 10 % off

5 or more consecutive insertions - 20 % off

deadline12:00 noon 1 business day

prior to publication

Books for sale?

Need a place to live?

Got a car to replace?

Need a ride home?

Chronicle Classifieds,

your on-campus site

to find a job, buy,

sell, trade,

find a place

for spring break

and much more...

dukechronicle.com/classifieds

President of the United States, and general pandemonium sets in. Some people take pictures, some tear up the turf to take home as a souvenir and some brave souls might even go for the goalpost to tear it down—a tradition that colleges have put a stop to for safety reasons. Something akin to a rave starts up in the middle of the field, as fans swarm the players, jump-ing up and down and slapping them on the helmets and shoulder pads.

There is nothing as exciting as pouring over that wall and stream-ing onto the field with friends and strangers alike, everyone caught up in the excitement and bonded together by a common sense of euphoria. Duke fans have been lucky enough to participate in this unique celebration two years in a row.

Last year’s game against North Carolina was the first time in a long time Blue Devil fans got to storm the field. The showdown with the Tar Heels ended in dramatic fash-ion. Jamison Crowder caught the game-winning touchdown pass with just seconds left, and the crowd took to the field in celebration of Dukes’ first bowl berth since 1994.

After the dust settles, a lot of people will say that they were the first one on the field following the victory. I am one of those people. After Crowder scored, I ran down to the front of the student section and took my place in the first row. As my legs dangled over the wall waiting to jump, a security guard politely asked me to use the stairs to access the field once the game finished. I don’t know if he was required to say that, or if he was just naïve. Either way, using the stairs never even crossed my mind, or anyone else’s. Where’s the fun in calmly storming the field?

After last year’s experience, people were ready this year. As the game came to a close Saturday, fans knew exactly what was about to happen

and exactly how to do it. And it was a beautiful sight, watching everyone come together to celebrate the victo-ry. For the second year in a row, the Blue Devils last home game ended in the best way imaginable.

In typical Duke football fashion, some students left the game after halftime to get ready for their Saturday night out, even though the Blue Devils went into the locker room with the lead. Some fans even left after the third quar-ter with Duke up by one. Those poor unfortunate souls missed out.

When I was 15 years old, I went to watch Kentucky play No. 1 LSU in Lexington, my hometown. The Wildcats knocked off the undefeat-ed Tigers in three overtimes, and Kentucky fans stormed the field and tore down the goal posts. Although my dad probably would have let me go onto the field, I didn’t. I stayed in my seat and watched one of the coolest things I’ve ever seen in sports. But to this day, my biggest regret as a football fan is that I didn’t take to the field that night.

I told myself I would never make that mistake again.

Thankfully, Duke has given me two opportunities to repent for my sin. I will be a senior next year, and I might never get another opportunity to storm a football field.

I can live with that. Thanks to the incredible seasons the Blue Devils have put together the past two years, I will remember for the rest of my life the times I got to go over the wall and onto the field at Wallace Wade Stadium like a Civil War solider rush-ing into battle.

At the N.C. State game two weeks ago I heard chants of “football school” coming from the home crowd in Wallace Wade. Saturday I chanted it along with most of the stadium. We may not be a “football school” for a long time, or ever, but the Blue Devils gave us a chance to celebrate like it Saturday, and that’s good enough for me.

first 11 shots from the floor and sprinting out to an early 21-7 lead. Duke’s first miss came with just more than 11 minutes re-maining in the first half.

Point guard Quinn Cook led the offen-sive barrage, finishing the opening period with 11 points and seven assists, but it was where his teammates were catching his passes that enabled them to have success. Twenty-eight of Duke’s 43 first-half points came in the paint. Parker was the main beneficiary of Cook’s passing, pouring in 12 first-half points on 6-of-8 shooting, nearly all of which came inside the key.

“They were going man, so we have scor-ers and guys that can make plays when they get in the lane. And then they went zone and kind of stood us up,” said Cook, who finished with 14 points and 10 assists. “We gutted it out at the end, and we need-ed this learning experience.”

The hot shooting did not last. Duke made just 16 of its last 46 shots, includ-ing plenty of looks around the rim. The vaunted 3-point assault was also lacking, as the Blue Devils were just 5-for-14 over-all from downtown.

“When we did get close to the bucket, we couldn’t finish the play tonight,” head coach Mike Krzyzewski said. “And then all of a sudden, [the Pirates] stay in there, and they’re playing really well, and there’s an incredible amount of game pressure. You can cut it with a knife. And I’m proud of my guys, we responded.”

Although East Carolina (4-1) never held a lead, there were times Tuesday when Duke’s nonconference home win-ning streak, which now stands at 105, ap-

peared in jeopardy. After falling behind 41-23, the Pirates stayed within striking dis-tance, trailing 43-32 at halftime, thanks in large part to nine offensive rebounds. East Carolina scored 14 second-chance points in the first half—Duke had none.

Early in the second half, the Pirates cut the Duke lead to 50-44, utilizing dribble penetration from point guard Prince Williams to set up open looks for teammate Akeem Richmond, who drilled three 3-pointers on the night. It wasn’t just Richmond who hurt the Blue Devils—four Pirates reached dou-ble-digit points.

What had been a well-oiled Duke offen-sive machine in the first half was anything but for most of the second period. Park-er was suddenly out of sorts, making just one of his first seven shots in the second half. At times, Hood seemed to be the only Blue Devil capable of solving the Pirates’ 2-3 zone, scoring nine of Duke’s first 14 points in the half.

“We were playing tight, as far as passing around the perimeter,” Hood said. “Me and Jabari took it upon ourselves to get in the middle and get to the basket. We got a couple fouls, got in the 1-and-1 and hit our free throws.... Once we got in the middle, good things happened.”

The Duke lead was whittled all the way down to 64-63 after two free throws by Williams with 6:59 remaining. Two plays later, Parker followed by hitting two from the line as well, but then missed a spectacular would-be alley-oop, creating another East Carolina fast break that led to more free throws.

But then Parker made the play of the game. He dribbled the length of the floor,

navigating through the entire Pirate squad, and elevated for a one-handed flush, send-ing the Cameron Crazies into an uproar and giving Duke a five-point lead.

“Jabari’s play full-court really kind of broke the ice for us,” Krzyzewski said. “It was like a statement play. It made all of our guys respond better. We’ve all been in situations where for moments we’re not as confident about something that you’d normally do in a confident manner. And you need to break through it. Our guys were able to break through it while they were playing, instead of talking about it afterwards after congratulating East Caro-lina on a win.”

Still East Carolina would not go away. A pair of jumpers by Paris Roberts-Camp-

bell kept the Pirates within five with under three minutes to play. But two blocks by Parker on the same Pirate possession gave the Blue Devils the stop they badly need-ed, and Hood converted the opportunity into two free throws to pad Duke’s lead and close out the game.

After struggling from the charity stripe in a 94-83 loss against Kansas Nov. 12 in the Champions Classic, the Blue Devils hit their foul shots down the stretch Tuesday night, going 19-for-24 in the second half.

“We practice [free throws] more, but you’ve got to be careful not to talk too much about it because you don’t want it to become ‘a thing,’” Krzyzewski said. “Some-times when you lose a game like that… it hurts, so you shoot a lot more.”

BEATON from page 7 M. BAskETBAll from page 7ON FOOTBAll from page 7

Matthew CiCanese/The ChroniCle

Redshirt sophomore Rodney Hood droped a career-high 30 points Tuesday, helping the Blue Devils hold on against a resilient Pirate squad.

dent who showed up before game time would’ve been allowed in. Any student who wanted to watch Duke dribble out the clock after a thrilling second half probably could’ve walked in for just that final moment.

Perhaps it was because students have midterms, Cragg said, and that Duke is amid a stretch of three home games in five days. There was the epic football game Saturday too. That’s a lot for even the most dedicated Blue Devil fans. And then there are other reasons that are common sense: Sometimes it’s nice to watch a game in high-definition on a couch with a beer and a laptop.

But go watch this team in person. This isn’t to blame students—I’ve spent plen-ty of games watching on a couch. And I’ve never bought the argument that any athletic team, professional or amateur, “deserves” fans. This argument has been made with practically every non-revenue sport, football and women’s basketball over the years. It usually sounds some-thing like, “Fans should go because the team is good and deserves the support of its peers.”

I don’t want to blame people for not going as if they’ve done something wrong. I just want to say: If you’re not watching this team in person, you’re missing out.

There is something so incredibly fun about this year’s team that doesn’t quite translate to television, even with surround sound and a 60-inch 1080p flat screen.

This is the type of team fans dream about. Not fans of Duke, fans of the sport.

A team that runs and guns, pumps fists and bumps chests, and dunks and dunks again. It’s a real-life video game.

Jabari Parker dunked the ball four times against East Carolina. One was an alley-oop from Cook that sent the fans—those that were there—berserk. On anoth-er, he dribbled the full length of the floor through four Pirate defenders and sent it home with ease as if he were playing alone on the Central Campus courts. There was almost a fifth—another alley-oop from Cook—that might have been the best slam in program history if Parker were able to successfully put it down with his mighty right arm that stretched out like Michael Jordan’s at the end of Space Jam. There will be plenty of time to watch Parker on TV next year, when he’s most likely playing in the NBA. What Parker, Rodney Hood and the rest of the Blue Devils are doing right here and now on Coach K Court isn’t the same on TV.

Whether the game is a blowout, like against UNC-Asheville, or a nail-biter, like against East Carolina, entertainment is guaranteed. If it’s a blowout, just enjoy the Durham Dunk Co. put on a highlight reel with ease. If it’s a good game, enjoy that. You’ll get some awesome dunks too.

The price of admission to Club Cam-eron is free, and the show is unlike any other in recent memory. Just ask any student who was there because with all the excitement this team generated, the noise at the end made it seem like the stands were packed.

“I felt like it was regular Cameron in here,” Cook said. “The fans who came did great.”


edit pages

10 | WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2013 commentary The Chronicle The Chronicle commentary WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2013 | 11

Letters PoLicyThe Chronicle welcomes submissions in the form of letters

to the editor or guest columns. Submissions must include the author’s name, signature, department or class, and for purposes of identification, phone number and local address. Letters should not exceed 325 words; contact the editorial department for information regarding guest columns.

The Chronicle will not publish anonymous or form letters or letters that are promotional in nature. The Chronicle reserves the right to edit letters and guest columns for length, clarity and style and the right to withhold letters based on the discretion of the editorial page editor.

Direct submissions to:

E-mail: [email protected]

Editorial Page DepartmentThe ChronicleBox 90858, Durham, NC 27708

Phone: (919) 684-2663Fax: (919) 684-4696

The C

hron

icle

Th

e i

nd

ep

en

de

nT

da

ily

aT

du

ke

un

ive

rs

iTy

”“ onlinecomment

Because intellectualism pervades every inch of Duke’s campus, including athletic fields and student line-ups for games, there is no reason for Duke’s academic prowess to fear an increase in athletic prowess. These two sides of campus identity are not antagonistic, but synergistic.

—“Grumpy Alum” commenting on the editorial “Football killed tailgate”

Inc. 1993Est. 1905 The ChronicleDanielle Muoio, Editor

Sophia DuranD, Managing EditorraiSa chowDhury, News Editor

Daniel carp, Sports EditorSophia palenberg, Photography Editor

Scott briggS, Editorial Page EditorcaSey williaMS, Editorial Board Chair

jiM poSen, Director of Online Developmentkelly Scurry, Managing editor for online

chriSSy beck, General Manager

eMMa baccellieri, University Editor carleigh StiehM, University Editor

elizabeth DjiniS, Local & National Editor georgia parke, Local & National Editor

anthony hagouel, Health & Science Editor tony Shan, Health & Science Editor

julia May, News Photography Editor eric lin, Sports Photography Editor

kelSey hopkinS, Design Editor rita lo, Design Editor

lauren feilich, Recess Editor jaMie keSSler, Recess Managing Editor

eliza bray, Recess Photography Editor thanh-ha nguyen, Online Photo Editor

MouSa alShanteer, Editorial Page Managing Editor Matt pun, Sports Managing Editor

aShley Mooney, Towerview Editor caitlin MoyleS, Towerview Editor

jennie Xu, Towerview Photography Editor Dillon patel, Towerview Creative Director

kriStie kiM, Social Media Editor julian Spector, Special Projects Editor

lauren carroll, Senior Editor chelSea pieroni, Multimedia Editor

anDrew luo, News Blog Editor glenn rivkeeS, Director of Online Operations

Matt barnett, Multimedia Editor yeShwanth kanDiMalla, Recruitment Chair

rebecca DickenSon, Advertising Director julia May, Recruitment Chair

Mary weaver, Operations Manager barbara Starbuck, Creative Director

Megan Mcginity, Digital Sales Manager

the chronicle is published by the Duke Student publishing company, inc., a non-profit corporation independent of Duke university. the opinions expressed in this newspaper are not necessarily those of Duke university, its students, faculty, staff, administration or trustees. unsigned editorials represent the majority view of the editorial board. columns, letters and cartoons represent the views of the authors.

to reach the editorial office at 301 flowers building, call 684-2663 or fax 684-4696. to reach the business office at 2022 campus Drive call 684-3811. to reach the advertising office at 2022 campus Drive call 684-3811

Athletic scholarships not only reward outstanding athletes for their hard work, they also allow the University to increase the competitiveness of its sports teams.

In order to field a competitive squad, Duke Football uses all 85 scholarships allotted to it as a way to attract promising players to Duke. The results of this recruitment effort—which Duke has coupled with other investments in the football program—are beginning to show, and we laud the team for its recent successes.

Although football scholarships have proven immensely valuable for the University, the current system of allocating athletic scholarships presents a set of difficult tradeoffs. In 1972 Congress passed Title IX, a portion of which seeks to promote gender equity in collegiate sports. To comply with Title IX, Duke counterbalances the 85 scholarships allotted to football by allocating an equal number of scholarships to women’s sports. As a result, it may put a strain on the allotment of scholarships for male non-revenue sports team, as adding scholarships for male athletes would knock Duke out of compliance with Title IX.

Gender equity in college sports—and Title IX, in particular—is extremely important.

Given the historical disparities in funding and support between male and female collegiate athletic programs, Title IX not only has a

strong legal justification, but it also aligns with Duke’s institutional priorities. It ensures that, at a University committed to providing all of its students opportunities for personal success, female athletes enjoy the same institutional support as their male counterparts. Diversity in athletics benefits participants—as it gives people who might not otherwise have a chance to hone their skill the ability to compete at a high level—and the student body at large—as it injects a large of number of talented and driven women into the undergraduate population.

It is important to remember, however, that a commitment to a strong football team and Title IX could put a strain on scholarship allotment for men’s non-revenue sports. These programs, and the students who participate in them, brim with skilled athletes. But, as we saw with Duke’s swimming and diving team last spring, programs

suffer, in part, when they do not have a sufficient number of scholarships to recruit the top talent. These athletes work very hard and would benefit greatly if men’s non-revenue sports had a greater number of scholarships to dole out. Altering the current structure of Title IX would require legislative changes, however, and though amendments to Title IX might be worthwhile to consider, revisions to the law reside beyond Duke’s immediate sphere of concern.

The value of both gender equality in athletics and a strong football team is sufficiently great to justify the current distribution of athletic scholarships. Using 85 of these scholarships to build a successful football team means more funding for all of Duke’s athletics programs, and allotting a large number of scholarships to women’s athletics means Duke can field highly competitive women’s teams and, most importantly, offer opportunities and support to its female athletes.

The opinions in the daily editorial are formulated by 13 voting members of the board, who, as an independent group, are explicitly prohibited from writing or editing for other daily or weekly sections.

The role of athletic scholarships

Editorial

In the paradoxically blistering and dripping afternoon heat of August, as you proudly tack a whiteboard to the door of your newly arranged

dorm room, you bid adieu to your parents. Their faces reflect their conflicted feelings of pride and terror, as their child is about to embark on a four-year journey that will change her life in

unimaginable and unpredictable ways. She might exchange her childhood desire to become a doctor for the equally eyesight-damaging career goal of becoming a lawyer. Or she might eschew the post-grad route altogether and opt instead for a lucrative career in finance or consulting, or a slightly less well-remunerated job as a teacher or a Peace Corps volunteer. Whatever transformation ends up happening, parents and students alike can rest assured that students will come out the other side as different people, for better or for worse.

It is the University’s responsibility to simultaneously foster students’ exploration of life-changing alternatives and to ensure that these pivotal transformations occur in as safe an environment as possible. There is no doubt that this is a difficult balance to strike. After all, most college students are legal adults, and many are of legal drinking age for at least the last year of their undergraduate career. But it is precisely students’ situation in this nebulous period between adolescence and adulthood that necessitates a brand of oversight that provides guidance and protection when requested and exists comfortingly and respectfully in the background when it is not.

Vanderbilt University students on Thursday filed a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights in the U.S. Department of Education, alleging that the university has not adequately responded to sexual assault on campus. Similar to complaints made by students at Yale University and Swarthmore College, Vanderbilt students alleged the school had not fulfilled its obligation under the Clery Act to ensure that cases of “domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault or stalking” be provided a “prompt, fair and impartial investigation and resolution.” In September, a former Vanderbilt football player accepted a plea deal for his involvement in the aggravated rape and battery of an unconscious female student in June. In exchange for testifying against his ex-teammates, Chris Boyd can stay in school and even get his record expunged if he stays out of trouble for a year.

I understand the practicalities of the deal. I understand how useful it is for prosecution to have Boyd testify against his former teammates. I even

understand that Boyd’s involvement only in covering up the crime makes him a good candidate for such a plea deal. He escapes a felony conviction and a two-year sentence, and the prosecution gets a stronger case. What doesn’t make sense is the fact that Boyd is allowed to continue at Vanderbilt and possibly even continue as a member of the football team. Essentially, assuming Boyd can live a PG-13 life for a single year, he will get off scot-free. In the meantime, the girl whose rape he helped to cover up must struggle with the repercussions of a half-remembered event that has fundamentally changed her life.

Even though reports such as Yale’s second climate campus assessment show that the obligations imposed by the Clery Act have contributed to a healthy sexual climate at schools, the unfortunate reality is that providing access to reporting mechanisms and fair trials does not ensure that victims of sexual assault and rape recognize their own need to take advantage of such services. This misrecognition could be the product of several different cultural realities, from the lack of sexual education class in middle and high schools across the country, to the double standard of responsibility for intoxicated people. Although universities across the country have come a long way in recognizing the prevalence of sexual assault on their campuses, a double standard of responsibility still prevails. The double standard is usually correlated to gender, where drunk women are held responsible for the aftermath of their drunken escapades, while drunk men are usually allowed to blame their actions on an alcohol-induced loss of inhibition.

Under most criminal statutes defining rape and sexual assault, intoxication negates the ability of either party to consent. This de jure reality, however, stands in contrast with the stark de facto reality of the hookup culture of undergraduates, in which alcohol and intoxication play a central role. It is this reality that makes its participants reason that, while they might have technically been sexually assaulted or raped, surely the strict consent provisions of the law were not meant to apply to their case.

That is not to say that undergraduate campuses should be dry. Nor do I want to argue that alcohol should be excluded from social interactions among adolescents and 20-somethings. It is just important to be careful where consent and alcohol are concerned. Universities may be obligated to deal with reported sexual crimes according to standards laid out in federal law, but individual students also have an obligation to translate legal standards into cultural reality.

Joline Doedens is a second-year law student. Her column runs every other Wednesday. Send Joline a message @jydoedens.

JolineDoedenswait a minute

responsibility and repercussions

First and foremost, let me apolo-gize. This article will make no sense. I’ll admit it: I’m on drugs.

I found out today that I have vocal nodes, a la Pitch Perfect. In the process of finding these nodes, as strange medi-cal instruments violated my nose, I acci-dentally inhaled some sort of stimulant. I think there is a good chance it was an amphetamine, because I feel like I

could wrestle a bear. But alas, the show must go on, even if your teeth are sen-tient and attempting to eat your face.

Anyway, I’d like to extend congratulations to the Duke Football team on their new Top 25 ranking. Your effort, teamwork and dedication have clearly paid off.

And that’s where my talking about football ends, because frankly, I think football is stupid. This is largely because it has too many rules, and also because I have serious ADHD, and any sport with 30 seconds of action for every 10 minutes of life spent watching is not for me.

But football fans, don’t take it personally. It’s more that I don’t like college sports in general. It makes approximately zero sense to me why sports are priorities of educational institutions. Who decided those two things go together? It makes just about as much sense for sports to be linked with prestigious academic and research institutions as it does for such institutions to be linked with pretty much any other hobby. Say baking. Or interpretive dance. Or competitive gardening. Think what life would be like if the Duke Campus Farm’s director made $10 million a year. Free zucchini for everyone. For LIFE.

Despite my qualms with athletics, back in freshman year, I went to pretty much every football game. And that, my friends, was because of Tailgate.

YES, I SAID IT. It’s a law of physics: The longer Duke football is discussed, the higher probability Tailgate is mentioned and its elimination is harped upon. Or, actually, mostly, it probably works the other way around.

Ah, Tailgate. The beautiful, somehow-related-to-football land where fairies, cow-men and human bananas came together to make out. Where we could drunkenly devour Chick-fil-A guilt-free, because sandwiches were not yet political props. Where trashcans were filled not with trash but with beer. I’ll admit, as I was a freshman (and, perhaps more importantly, a freshman with a boyfriend) for all of my Tailgate experiences, I probably didn’t understand Tailgate’s greek-ness or its role as a prolonged mating ritual. The world I saw in the Blue Zone was simply perfection.

Now, I understand Tailgate had its problems, culminating in the world’s most appalling demonstration of idiocy ever. (Seriously, who would bring someone

who probably doesn’t have pubic hair yet to an event where people SNORT COCAINE OFF CARS … and then LEAVE THEM THERE ALONE??) But that was never the Tailgate I experienced. In fact, walking up to my first Tailgate, it was the first time Duke felt like home.

When it came time to choose where to go to college, I had a really hard time deciding. In fact, I did not pick

Duke for its academic rigor or because it “felt right.” I chose Duke for the aid package I was offered. Knowing money ruled my decision over actual fit with the school, I was already unsure whether I’d like it at all.

Arriving at college, I didn’t understand the Duke scene. Social status was a new concept to me, and I hated the pressure to “act cool.” I was used to my hometown, where my friends and I spent most of our time acting like immature 5-year-olds high off of Pixie Sticks. During my first month or so at Duke, I couldn’t find anyone willing to be weird or even a bit uncool. I was pretty sure I’d made the wrong choice.

And then came the first football game. Walking up to Tailgate and seeing what must have been every single Duke student dressed in absolutely ridiculous (and awesome) costumes, dancing to blaring music, throwing beer everywhere and generally just not giving a f--k—it was the first time I knew I had made the right choice by coming to Duke. I knew if the entire Duke student body was easygoing enough—or goofy enough—to participate in something like Tailgate, I would surely find I would like it here.

But Tailgate is gone, and for many good reasons. And as much as I’d love to see it back, I don’t miss most parts of it. What I do miss is the realization that although Duke students are intelligent and driven, they also don’t take themselves too seriously. As I’ve progressed in my Duke career, I’ve become less and less sure of the lesson Tailgate taught me. When Duke lost Tailgate, it lost more than a party. It lost its only true venue for all students—any students—to be goofy.

But Dukies, take heart. Everybody’s weird, and it shouldn’t take a coating of beer for that part of you to come out. Tailgate exists in the hearts and minds of Duke students, as long as we’re willing to look for it. Even though we don’t have a formal event to be weird at, you shouldn’t be afraid to show off your internal tutu and let everyone know the weirdo you truly are.

Lillie Reed is a Trinity senior. Her col-umn is part of the weekly Socialites feature and runs every other Wednesday. Send Lil-lie a message on Twitter @LillieReed.

The inner tutu Somewhere along the way, students and educators became an afterthought at this school.

When, on April 25, 2013—a day after undergraduate classes had ended—Duke’s faculty representatives voted against the adoption of online courses for credit, certain decisions had already been made. A special session of the Arts and Sciences Council had to be scheduled to approve an agreement with a for-profit corporation, 2U, that the Provost signed five months prior. Wary of un-answered questions, faculty representatives

voted to break that contract. But pursuing online education had long

been promised—and not by people in class-rooms. That commitment carries forward.

Over the summer, the University named a new vice provost specifically to “oversee Duke’s experiments with online educa-tion.” (Details are hazy, but it’s clear who the test subjects will be.) Since then, de-partments have been hit with solicitations for online proposals, the campus with a surge of presentations promoting the me-dium. I attended two in just the last week.

It’s part of a wave sweeping across Ameri-can universities, one that conservative colum-nist David Brooks calls a “campus tsunami.” What these tides will bring—and who they might submerge—remains to be seen.

In the midst, we are pushed along like so much flotsam.

As for many of my fellow students, this story—the future they foresee for us—was un-familiar to me until recently. It only broke the surface when, on November 7, a concerned faculty member emailed me writing of “terrify-ing” curricular changes advocated by the ad-ministration. The letter describes “alarm wide-ranging attempts by the provost and dean, with the acquiescence and eager cheerleading of the chair of Trinity Arts & Sciences Council, to push through a fundamental transforma-tion of undergraduate education at Duke.”

This tenured professor with a family and children prefers to remain unnamed for fear of professional pressure. After further conversation, however, I was in-troduced to several other faculty mem-bers relating the same issues.

“We’re talking about the questions that don’t even get raised, because there’s no place to raise them,” says Wahneema Lubia-no, associate professor of African and African American studies. “If you show up to a forum that tells you how to do online teaching, that’s not the place where you can say: Wait, isn’t there an earlier conversation that we should have had, before we got to how to do this thing? Why do we do this thing, and under what conditions? For whom is this intended?”

These are people, in the words of Priscilla Wald, professor of English and women’s studies, who are “profoundly committed teachers.” Potential erosion of the pedagogy so central to their lives has driven them to voice their concerns.

Jocelyn Olcott, associate professor of histo-ry and international comparative studies, lit-erally drove from research leave to speak with me. She articulated a position shared by all of the educators I met, far from simple opposi-

tion to new technology. They agree: Lectures made freely available, a kind of “educational television,” are overwhelmingly positive. But should that subsume the classroom?

“In general, online seems good for highly specialized courses,” notes Olcott. “It works well for remedial education, where there’s a pretty clear answer.” Re-search, critical engagement and students with special needs—what distinguishes a school—are tossed by the wayside.

I found that even administration-sponsored presenters generally concede

this point. Online packages follow a typi-cal formula: resource pages, comment threads and taped lectures/discussions that leave “synchronous” engagement for office hours and seminar sessions. “At its worst,” says Olcott, “it’s a cookie-cutter ap-proach that assumes knowledge is static and all students learn in the same way.”

In its open letter rejecting the offer to adopt Harvard’s online course surveying jus-tice, the San Jose State University philosophy department was less polite. To teach justice via “videotaped lectures that include excerpts of Harvard students making comments,” they wrote, “amounts to a cruel joke.”

“Scholarship is something that lives,” Wald emphasizes. “Over a year, I’ve changed my perspective; I’ve read other things … I have—best of all—learned from my stu-dents.” Micaela Janan, associate professor of classical studies, observes how old the pro-posed model actually is. “It’s the teacher with the yellowed notes,” she says, referencing the crude practice of giving unchanging lectures.

Put differently, it’s an upscale Univer-sity of Phoenix, at $58,278 a year.

The headlong rush to digitize curricula has left questions lingering across campuses. Academic labor implications, for one, are staggering. While Dean Laurie Patton pro-claims “profit is not a dirty word,” as she did of 2U, faculty members foresee funds flowing from teaching positions (you only need the one on video, after all) outward to a handful of Ivy League stars and tech corporations.

And we still barely understand what “on-line” does to “education.” A 2010 Depart-ment of Education report found only five sufficiently rigorous studies on online edu-cation’s “learning effects,” concluding that the research largely remains to be done. A study published this year found instruction-al technology generally “helps in logistics, not learning” at research universities. Its au-thor, sociologist David Johnson, describes with dismay the “ceremonial myth” among administrators “that being a cutting-edge university means being high tech.”

There’s a better way for Duke to be cut-ting-edge in its cohort, and it’s what these dedicated teachers ask. Let us think through what this means for our community: broad-ly, openly and collaboratively. Let us set the terms of our relationships collectively.

Isn’t that what the internet was sup-posed to be about?

Prashanth Kamalakanthan is a Trinity senior. His column runs every other Wednesday. Send Prashanth a message on Twitter @pkinbrief.

online and disconnectedthe socialites

LillieReedwumbology

Prashanth Kamalakanthansubalternatives

Want to contribute to campus dialogue? The Spring 2014 columnist and Monday, Monday applications are now available.

Send an email to [email protected] for more information.


edit pages

10 | WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2013 commentary The Chronicle The Chronicle commentary WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2013 | 11

Letters PoLicyThe Chronicle welcomes submissions in the form of letters

to the editor or guest columns. Submissions must include the author’s name, signature, department or class, and for purposes of identification, phone number and local address. Letters should not exceed 325 words; contact the editorial department for information regarding guest columns.

The Chronicle will not publish anonymous or form letters or letters that are promotional in nature. The Chronicle reserves the right to edit letters and guest columns for length, clarity and style and the right to withhold letters based on the discretion of the editorial page editor.

Direct submissions to:

E-mail: [email protected]

Editorial Page DepartmentThe ChronicleBox 90858, Durham, NC 27708

Phone: (919) 684-2663Fax: (919) 684-4696

The C

hron

icle

Th

e i

nd

ep

en

de

nT

da

ily

aT

du

ke

un

ive

rs

iTy

”“ onlinecomment

Because intellectualism pervades every inch of Duke’s campus, including athletic fields and student line-ups for games, there is no reason for Duke’s academic prowess to fear an increase in athletic prowess. These two sides of campus identity are not antagonistic, but synergistic.

—“Grumpy Alum” commenting on the editorial “Football killed tailgate”

Inc. 1993Est. 1905 The ChronicleDanielle Muoio, Editor

Sophia DuranD, Managing EditorraiSa chowDhury, News Editor

Daniel carp, Sports EditorSophia palenberg, Photography Editor

Scott briggS, Editorial Page EditorcaSey williaMS, Editorial Board Chair

jiM poSen, Director of Online Developmentkelly Scurry, Managing editor for online

chriSSy beck, General Manager

eMMa baccellieri, University Editor carleigh StiehM, University Editor

elizabeth DjiniS, Local & National Editor georgia parke, Local & National Editor

anthony hagouel, Health & Science Editor tony Shan, Health & Science Editor

julia May, News Photography Editor eric lin, Sports Photography Editor

kelSey hopkinS, Design Editor rita lo, Design Editor

lauren feilich, Recess Editor jaMie keSSler, Recess Managing Editor

eliza bray, Recess Photography Editor thanh-ha nguyen, Online Photo Editor

MouSa alShanteer, Editorial Page Managing Editor Matt pun, Sports Managing Editor

aShley Mooney, Towerview Editor caitlin MoyleS, Towerview Editor

jennie Xu, Towerview Photography Editor Dillon patel, Towerview Creative Director

kriStie kiM, Social Media Editor julian Spector, Special Projects Editor

lauren carroll, Senior Editor chelSea pieroni, Multimedia Editor

anDrew luo, News Blog Editor glenn rivkeeS, Director of Online Operations

Matt barnett, Multimedia Editor yeShwanth kanDiMalla, Recruitment Chair

rebecca DickenSon, Advertising Director julia May, Recruitment Chair

Mary weaver, Operations Manager barbara Starbuck, Creative Director

Megan Mcginity, Digital Sales Manager

the chronicle is published by the Duke Student publishing company, inc., a non-profit corporation independent of Duke university. the opinions expressed in this newspaper are not necessarily those of Duke university, its students, faculty, staff, administration or trustees. unsigned editorials represent the majority view of the editorial board. columns, letters and cartoons represent the views of the authors.

to reach the editorial office at 301 flowers building, call 684-2663 or fax 684-4696. to reach the business office at 2022 campus Drive call 684-3811. to reach the advertising office at 2022 campus Drive call 684-3811

Athletic scholarships not only reward outstanding athletes for their hard work, they also allow the University to increase the competitiveness of its sports teams.

In order to field a competitive squad, Duke Football uses all 85 scholarships allotted to it as a way to attract promising players to Duke. The results of this recruitment effort—which Duke has coupled with other investments in the football program—are beginning to show, and we laud the team for its recent successes.

Although football scholarships have proven immensely valuable for the University, the current system of allocating athletic scholarships presents a set of difficult tradeoffs. In 1972 Congress passed Title IX, a portion of which seeks to promote gender equity in collegiate sports. To comply with Title IX, Duke counterbalances the 85 scholarships allotted to football by allocating an equal number of scholarships to women’s sports. As a result, it may put a strain on the allotment of scholarships for male non-revenue sports team, as adding scholarships for male athletes would knock Duke out of compliance with Title IX.

Gender equity in college sports—and Title IX, in particular—is extremely important.

Given the historical disparities in funding and support between male and female collegiate athletic programs, Title IX not only has a

strong legal justification, but it also aligns with Duke’s institutional priorities. It ensures that, at a University committed to providing all of its students opportunities for personal success, female athletes enjoy the same institutional support as their male counterparts. Diversity in athletics benefits participants—as it gives people who might not otherwise have a chance to hone their skill the ability to compete at a high level—and the student body at large—as it injects a large of number of talented and driven women into the undergraduate population.

It is important to remember, however, that a commitment to a strong football team and Title IX could put a strain on scholarship allotment for men’s non-revenue sports. These programs, and the students who participate in them, brim with skilled athletes. But, as we saw with Duke’s swimming and diving team last spring, programs

suffer, in part, when they do not have a sufficient number of scholarships to recruit the top talent. These athletes work very hard and would benefit greatly if men’s non-revenue sports had a greater number of scholarships to dole out. Altering the current structure of Title IX would require legislative changes, however, and though amendments to Title IX might be worthwhile to consider, revisions to the law reside beyond Duke’s immediate sphere of concern.

The value of both gender equality in athletics and a strong football team is sufficiently great to justify the current distribution of athletic scholarships. Using 85 of these scholarships to build a successful football team means more funding for all of Duke’s athletics programs, and allotting a large number of scholarships to women’s athletics means Duke can field highly competitive women’s teams and, most importantly, offer opportunities and support to its female athletes.

The opinions in the daily editorial are formulated by 13 voting members of the board, who, as an independent group, are explicitly prohibited from writing or editing for other daily or weekly sections.

The role of athletic scholarships

Editorial

In the paradoxically blistering and dripping afternoon heat of August, as you proudly tack a whiteboard to the door of your newly arranged

dorm room, you bid adieu to your parents. Their faces reflect their conflicted feelings of pride and terror, as their child is about to embark on a four-year journey that will change her life in

unimaginable and unpredictable ways. She might exchange her childhood desire to become a doctor for the equally eyesight-damaging career goal of becoming a lawyer. Or she might eschew the post-grad route altogether and opt instead for a lucrative career in finance or consulting, or a slightly less well-remunerated job as a teacher or a Peace Corps volunteer. Whatever transformation ends up happening, parents and students alike can rest assured that students will come out the other side as different people, for better or for worse.

It is the University’s responsibility to simultaneously foster students’ exploration of life-changing alternatives and to ensure that these pivotal transformations occur in as safe an environment as possible. There is no doubt that this is a difficult balance to strike. After all, most college students are legal adults, and many are of legal drinking age for at least the last year of their undergraduate career. But it is precisely students’ situation in this nebulous period between adolescence and adulthood that necessitates a brand of oversight that provides guidance and protection when requested and exists comfortingly and respectfully in the background when it is not.

Vanderbilt University students on Thursday filed a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights in the U.S. Department of Education, alleging that the university has not adequately responded to sexual assault on campus. Similar to complaints made by students at Yale University and Swarthmore College, Vanderbilt students alleged the school had not fulfilled its obligation under the Clery Act to ensure that cases of “domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault or stalking” be provided a “prompt, fair and impartial investigation and resolution.” In September, a former Vanderbilt football player accepted a plea deal for his involvement in the aggravated rape and battery of an unconscious female student in June. In exchange for testifying against his ex-teammates, Chris Boyd can stay in school and even get his record expunged if he stays out of trouble for a year.

I understand the practicalities of the deal. I understand how useful it is for prosecution to have Boyd testify against his former teammates. I even

understand that Boyd’s involvement only in covering up the crime makes him a good candidate for such a plea deal. He escapes a felony conviction and a two-year sentence, and the prosecution gets a stronger case. What doesn’t make sense is the fact that Boyd is allowed to continue at Vanderbilt and possibly even continue as a member of the football team. Essentially, assuming Boyd can live a PG-13 life for a single year, he will get off scot-free. In the meantime, the girl whose rape he helped to cover up must struggle with the repercussions of a half-remembered event that has fundamentally changed her life.

Even though reports such as Yale’s second climate campus assessment show that the obligations imposed by the Clery Act have contributed to a healthy sexual climate at schools, the unfortunate reality is that providing access to reporting mechanisms and fair trials does not ensure that victims of sexual assault and rape recognize their own need to take advantage of such services. This misrecognition could be the product of several different cultural realities, from the lack of sexual education class in middle and high schools across the country, to the double standard of responsibility for intoxicated people. Although universities across the country have come a long way in recognizing the prevalence of sexual assault on their campuses, a double standard of responsibility still prevails. The double standard is usually correlated to gender, where drunk women are held responsible for the aftermath of their drunken escapades, while drunk men are usually allowed to blame their actions on an alcohol-induced loss of inhibition.

Under most criminal statutes defining rape and sexual assault, intoxication negates the ability of either party to consent. This de jure reality, however, stands in contrast with the stark de facto reality of the hookup culture of undergraduates, in which alcohol and intoxication play a central role. It is this reality that makes its participants reason that, while they might have technically been sexually assaulted or raped, surely the strict consent provisions of the law were not meant to apply to their case.

That is not to say that undergraduate campuses should be dry. Nor do I want to argue that alcohol should be excluded from social interactions among adolescents and 20-somethings. It is just important to be careful where consent and alcohol are concerned. Universities may be obligated to deal with reported sexual crimes according to standards laid out in federal law, but individual students also have an obligation to translate legal standards into cultural reality.

Joline Doedens is a second-year law student. Her column runs every other Wednesday. Send Joline a message @jydoedens.

JolineDoedenswait a minute

responsibility and repercussions

First and foremost, let me apolo-gize. This article will make no sense. I’ll admit it: I’m on drugs.

I found out today that I have vocal nodes, a la Pitch Perfect. In the process of finding these nodes, as strange medi-cal instruments violated my nose, I acci-dentally inhaled some sort of stimulant. I think there is a good chance it was an amphetamine, because I feel like I

could wrestle a bear. But alas, the show must go on, even if your teeth are sen-tient and attempting to eat your face.

Anyway, I’d like to extend congratulations to the Duke Football team on their new Top 25 ranking. Your effort, teamwork and dedication have clearly paid off.

And that’s where my talking about football ends, because frankly, I think football is stupid. This is largely because it has too many rules, and also because I have serious ADHD, and any sport with 30 seconds of action for every 10 minutes of life spent watching is not for me.

But football fans, don’t take it personally. It’s more that I don’t like college sports in general. It makes approximately zero sense to me why sports are priorities of educational institutions. Who decided those two things go together? It makes just about as much sense for sports to be linked with prestigious academic and research institutions as it does for such institutions to be linked with pretty much any other hobby. Say baking. Or interpretive dance. Or competitive gardening. Think what life would be like if the Duke Campus Farm’s director made $10 million a year. Free zucchini for everyone. For LIFE.

Despite my qualms with athletics, back in freshman year, I went to pretty much every football game. And that, my friends, was because of Tailgate.

YES, I SAID IT. It’s a law of physics: The longer Duke football is discussed, the higher probability Tailgate is mentioned and its elimination is harped upon. Or, actually, mostly, it probably works the other way around.

Ah, Tailgate. The beautiful, somehow-related-to-football land where fairies, cow-men and human bananas came together to make out. Where we could drunkenly devour Chick-fil-A guilt-free, because sandwiches were not yet political props. Where trashcans were filled not with trash but with beer. I’ll admit, as I was a freshman (and, perhaps more importantly, a freshman with a boyfriend) for all of my Tailgate experiences, I probably didn’t understand Tailgate’s greek-ness or its role as a prolonged mating ritual. The world I saw in the Blue Zone was simply perfection.

Now, I understand Tailgate had its problems, culminating in the world’s most appalling demonstration of idiocy ever. (Seriously, who would bring someone

who probably doesn’t have pubic hair yet to an event where people SNORT COCAINE OFF CARS … and then LEAVE THEM THERE ALONE??) But that was never the Tailgate I experienced. In fact, walking up to my first Tailgate, it was the first time Duke felt like home.

When it came time to choose where to go to college, I had a really hard time deciding. In fact, I did not pick

Duke for its academic rigor or because it “felt right.” I chose Duke for the aid package I was offered. Knowing money ruled my decision over actual fit with the school, I was already unsure whether I’d like it at all.

Arriving at college, I didn’t understand the Duke scene. Social status was a new concept to me, and I hated the pressure to “act cool.” I was used to my hometown, where my friends and I spent most of our time acting like immature 5-year-olds high off of Pixie Sticks. During my first month or so at Duke, I couldn’t find anyone willing to be weird or even a bit uncool. I was pretty sure I’d made the wrong choice.

And then came the first football game. Walking up to Tailgate and seeing what must have been every single Duke student dressed in absolutely ridiculous (and awesome) costumes, dancing to blaring music, throwing beer everywhere and generally just not giving a f--k—it was the first time I knew I had made the right choice by coming to Duke. I knew if the entire Duke student body was easygoing enough—or goofy enough—to participate in something like Tailgate, I would surely find I would like it here.

But Tailgate is gone, and for many good reasons. And as much as I’d love to see it back, I don’t miss most parts of it. What I do miss is the realization that although Duke students are intelligent and driven, they also don’t take themselves too seriously. As I’ve progressed in my Duke career, I’ve become less and less sure of the lesson Tailgate taught me. When Duke lost Tailgate, it lost more than a party. It lost its only true venue for all students—any students—to be goofy.

But Dukies, take heart. Everybody’s weird, and it shouldn’t take a coating of beer for that part of you to come out. Tailgate exists in the hearts and minds of Duke students, as long as we’re willing to look for it. Even though we don’t have a formal event to be weird at, you shouldn’t be afraid to show off your internal tutu and let everyone know the weirdo you truly are.

Lillie Reed is a Trinity senior. Her col-umn is part of the weekly Socialites feature and runs every other Wednesday. Send Lil-lie a message on Twitter @LillieReed.

The inner tutu Somewhere along the way, students and educators became an afterthought at this school.

When, on April 25, 2013—a day after undergraduate classes had ended—Duke’s faculty representatives voted against the adoption of online courses for credit, certain decisions had already been made. A special session of the Arts and Sciences Council had to be scheduled to approve an agreement with a for-profit corporation, 2U, that the Provost signed five months prior. Wary of un-answered questions, faculty representatives

voted to break that contract. But pursuing online education had long

been promised—and not by people in class-rooms. That commitment carries forward.

Over the summer, the University named a new vice provost specifically to “oversee Duke’s experiments with online educa-tion.” (Details are hazy, but it’s clear who the test subjects will be.) Since then, de-partments have been hit with solicitations for online proposals, the campus with a surge of presentations promoting the me-dium. I attended two in just the last week.

It’s part of a wave sweeping across Ameri-can universities, one that conservative colum-nist David Brooks calls a “campus tsunami.” What these tides will bring—and who they might submerge—remains to be seen.

In the midst, we are pushed along like so much flotsam.

As for many of my fellow students, this story—the future they foresee for us—was un-familiar to me until recently. It only broke the surface when, on November 7, a concerned faculty member emailed me writing of “terrify-ing” curricular changes advocated by the ad-ministration. The letter describes “alarm wide-ranging attempts by the provost and dean, with the acquiescence and eager cheerleading of the chair of Trinity Arts & Sciences Council, to push through a fundamental transforma-tion of undergraduate education at Duke.”

This tenured professor with a family and children prefers to remain unnamed for fear of professional pressure. After further conversation, however, I was in-troduced to several other faculty mem-bers relating the same issues.

“We’re talking about the questions that don’t even get raised, because there’s no place to raise them,” says Wahneema Lubia-no, associate professor of African and African American studies. “If you show up to a forum that tells you how to do online teaching, that’s not the place where you can say: Wait, isn’t there an earlier conversation that we should have had, before we got to how to do this thing? Why do we do this thing, and under what conditions? For whom is this intended?”

These are people, in the words of Priscilla Wald, professor of English and women’s studies, who are “profoundly committed teachers.” Potential erosion of the pedagogy so central to their lives has driven them to voice their concerns.

Jocelyn Olcott, associate professor of histo-ry and international comparative studies, lit-erally drove from research leave to speak with me. She articulated a position shared by all of the educators I met, far from simple opposi-

tion to new technology. They agree: Lectures made freely available, a kind of “educational television,” are overwhelmingly positive. But should that subsume the classroom?

“In general, online seems good for highly specialized courses,” notes Olcott. “It works well for remedial education, where there’s a pretty clear answer.” Re-search, critical engagement and students with special needs—what distinguishes a school—are tossed by the wayside.

I found that even administration-sponsored presenters generally concede

this point. Online packages follow a typi-cal formula: resource pages, comment threads and taped lectures/discussions that leave “synchronous” engagement for office hours and seminar sessions. “At its worst,” says Olcott, “it’s a cookie-cutter ap-proach that assumes knowledge is static and all students learn in the same way.”

In its open letter rejecting the offer to adopt Harvard’s online course surveying jus-tice, the San Jose State University philosophy department was less polite. To teach justice via “videotaped lectures that include excerpts of Harvard students making comments,” they wrote, “amounts to a cruel joke.”

“Scholarship is something that lives,” Wald emphasizes. “Over a year, I’ve changed my perspective; I’ve read other things … I have—best of all—learned from my stu-dents.” Micaela Janan, associate professor of classical studies, observes how old the pro-posed model actually is. “It’s the teacher with the yellowed notes,” she says, referencing the crude practice of giving unchanging lectures.

Put differently, it’s an upscale Univer-sity of Phoenix, at $58,278 a year.

The headlong rush to digitize curricula has left questions lingering across campuses. Academic labor implications, for one, are staggering. While Dean Laurie Patton pro-claims “profit is not a dirty word,” as she did of 2U, faculty members foresee funds flowing from teaching positions (you only need the one on video, after all) outward to a handful of Ivy League stars and tech corporations.

And we still barely understand what “on-line” does to “education.” A 2010 Depart-ment of Education report found only five sufficiently rigorous studies on online edu-cation’s “learning effects,” concluding that the research largely remains to be done. A study published this year found instruction-al technology generally “helps in logistics, not learning” at research universities. Its au-thor, sociologist David Johnson, describes with dismay the “ceremonial myth” among administrators “that being a cutting-edge university means being high tech.”

There’s a better way for Duke to be cut-ting-edge in its cohort, and it’s what these dedicated teachers ask. Let us think through what this means for our community: broad-ly, openly and collaboratively. Let us set the terms of our relationships collectively.

Isn’t that what the internet was sup-posed to be about?

Prashanth Kamalakanthan is a Trinity senior. His column runs every other Wednesday. Send Prashanth a message on Twitter @pkinbrief.

online and disconnectedthe socialites

LillieReedwumbology

Prashanth Kamalakanthansubalternatives

Want to contribute to campus dialogue? The Spring 2014 columnist and Monday, Monday applications are now available.

Send an email to [email protected] for more information.


OPERATION: Stores Administration PUBLICATION: ChronicleHEADLINE: Sign Up DATES: 11/02/07COLOR: CMYK

sign up.Be the first to know about new arrivals,

special collections, the latest in technology,sales events, textbook buyback and more.

For more information, visit our website atwww.dukestores.duke.edu and click on the BTFTK icon on the left.

Our Privacy Policy:We respect your right to personal privacy. We promise to use this subscription service for the express purpose of keeping you informed of only those services that you have requested. Your personal information will not be disclosed to any third parties. We hope you will find our e-mails of benefit. We promise to keep them informative and to-the-point. You will have the option of unsubscribing from this service with each e-mail campaign.

locopops products will continue to be available through 23 merchants in the re-search Triangle area, including The Museum of life and Science Café, Foster’s Market and Sam’s Quik Shop in Durham, she added.

not all customers prefer the mobile conve-nience to the classical store setting though.

“There was something special about the storefront—the large whiteboard with funny drawings, the freezers full of colorful pops, it felt almost nostalgic,” elliot Acosta, a frequent customer of the locopops raleigh store, wrote in an email Monday. “it’s sad it’s going away and that’s something you cannot replicate buy-ing from a retail store.”

Bicknell echoed a similar sentiment about the classical store setting.

“i agree totally that there are flavors and a customer experience that are unique to visit-ing our store, which is one reason why we’ve kept Durham open,” she wrote in an email Tuesday.

Acosta said he still looks forward to pur-chasing locopops products through other venues.

Similarly, local Yogurt closed down its Dur-

ham store on University Drive in July. how-ever, there are no plans to close other local Yogurt venues.

“The lease was up and our erwin store is fairly close by, so we just thought it was the right timing to change some things,” said leah Bergman, co-owner of local Yogurt.

local Yogurt currently has three locations in Durham, elon and Greenville. There are also loYo on the Go food trucks circulating around the cities, however the loYo truck was not invited back to Duke’s campus this year.

local Yogurt’s business has declined slight-ly as of late, said Madeline Jones, an employee at the venue on erwin road.

“Usually we get more customers at night than during the day, but in general things haven’t changed very much,” she said.

Although business has changed in the past year, the local Yogurt on erwin road is here to stay.

“of course, things are changing and we are always looking around for new locations to move to, but the stores that we currently have will stay for a while,” Bergman said.

Bergman added that she plans to expand by adding a few more trucks and machines when students are away for the holiday season.

LOCOPOPS from page 1

“The trick is something that’s filling,” Dowe said. “People want vegan food to taste like steak or chicken—well, it’s not. We try to keep our food as real as pos-sible, providing dishes made with prod-ucts from the earth rather than those that are processed.”

lavanya Sunder, vice president for services of Duke Student Government, said that despite complaints about lack of dining options in general, there have been few complaints about specifically vegetarian and vegan options. however, a lack of information regarding the veg-an foods’ location has presented a larger problem than the quality of the food.

“The problem is that students don’t know where these options are,” Sunder said. “There is a lack of readily available information.”

Because of recent dining changes, DSG and Duke University Student Din-ing Advisory Committee are working alongside the nutrition education Task Force—a student group promoting nu-trition and healthy dining at Duke—in order to increase this accessible informa-tion and improve labeling, Sunder said.

Sunder also said that Bon Appetit, a food management company Duke uses, is currently overhauling nutrition in Penn Pavillion.

“The wheels are already turning,” she said.

Dishes at the november Chef’s Chat-ter, which occurred in celebration of national Vegan Month, included black bean wraps, portabello sloppy joe sliders, lentil soup and vegan bruschetta .

Junior Sandy ren, a non-vegan said the vegan sloppy joe was better than any meat forms of it she had eaten.

“i was blown away by it,” ren said.

This kind of enthusiasm for vegan dishes is something Dowe aims for. Al-though he has heard no complaints about the quality of vegan food options, he said people are always looking for ad-ditional choices.

other special dietary preferences are on DSG’s radar as well, such as attempt-ing to provide sufficient options for those who keep kosher.

The population of students who keep kosher is relatively small and Duke does what it needs to for the Jewish Commu-nity, said rachel Fraade, vice president of religious life for the Jewish Student Union. however, those who do keep ko-sher can find it to be a costly and incon-venient practice on campus.

“Food at the Freeman Center [for Jewish life] is very good, but it can be out of the way and become very expen-sive,” Fraade said.

The Freeman Center serves kosher dinner five nights per week with dishes that often include meat.

Fraade said most kosher students tend to follow vegetarian diets in order to avoid dealing with kosher meat restric-tions.

“The biggest suggestion, therefore, is to provide more vegetarian options and to improve the level of convenience,” she said.

Fraade speculated that with the up-coming opening of West Union and the prospect of a more expansive kitchen, however, dining services may be better able to serve the needs of those with spe-cial dietary preferences.

VEGAN from page 1

JON BEDELL/the chronicle

The Locopops stores in Raleigh and Chapel Hill have closed due to slow business.

Make qduke.com your homepage

Documents

November 20, 2013