4
8 OCTOBER 2018 notos-group.com NOTOS NEWS | CONTAINER / LINER LINERS’ SANDWICH POSITION EASES In our June edition of Notos Quarterly, we described the liner companies as trapped by weak freight rates, rising fuel prices and increasing charter expenses. To illustrate this, we calculated the ratio of the China Containerized Freight Index (CCFI) to the price for 380cst Rotterdam fuel. Further, we put this ratio in contrast to the Clarksons Containership Timecharter Rate Index. Historic data showed that each time the freight-to-bunker-price ratio fell amidst rising charter rates - as was the case in 2007, 2010/2011 and 2015 - the charter rates corrected subsequently. In this article, we have updated the respective data until end-September to examine if the history repeated itself once again. And it did, as shown in the graph below: the charter rate index has fallen since July. Liner companies have been squeezed between weak freight rates, rising fuel prices and higher charter expenses for quite some time. Although charter rates for small and mid-sized boxships have been correcting since summer, rising fuel prices, IMO 2020 regulations and the Sino-US trade conflict are enough of issues to continue to burden liner companies. For more information please contact: DR. CHRISTINA STAHN [email protected] +49 40 6094 550 - 0 0,00 0,25 0,50 0,75 1,00 1,25 1,50 1,75 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 Index Points LINERS' SITUATION ABOUT TO EASE SOMEWHAT Bunker Price-Adjusted Freight Index Containership Timecharter Rate Index Source: Clarksons, Notos 09/2018

NOTOS NEWS | CONTAINER / LINER · Navios Maritime Containers is currently listed on Norway’s over-the-counter exchange and aimed to bring a fleet of 25 feeder containerships to

  • Upload
    lemien

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8 OCTOBER 2018

notos-group.com

NOTOS NEWS | CONTAINER / LINER

L I N E R S ’ S A N D W I C H P O S I T I O N

E A S E S

In our June edition of Notos Quarterly, we described the liner companies as trapped by weak freight rates, rising fuel prices and increasing charter expenses. To illustrate this, we calculated the ratio of the China Containerized Freight Index (CCFI) to the price for 380cst Rotterdam fuel. Further, we put this ratio in contrast to the Clarksons Containership Timecharter Rate Index.

Historic data showed that each time the freight-to-bunker-price ratio fell amidst rising charter rates - as was the case in 2007, 2010/2011 and

2015 - the charter rates corrected subsequently.

In this article, we have updated the respective data until end-September to examine if the history repeated itself once again. And it did, as shown in the graph below: the charter rate index has fallen since July.

Liner companies have been squeezed between weak freight rates, rising fuel prices and higher charter expenses for quite some time. Although charter rates for small and mid-sized boxships have been correcting since summer, rising fuel prices, IMO 2020 regulations and the Sino-US trade conflict are enough of issues to continue to burden liner companies.

For more information please contact:

DR. CHRISTINA STAHN

[email protected]

+49 40 6094 550 - 0

0,00

0,25

0,50

0,75

1,00

1,25

1,50

1,75

'04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18

Inde

x Po

ints

L I N E R S ' S I T U A T I O N A B O U T T O E A S E S O M E W H A T

Bunker Price-Adjusted Freight Index Containership Timecharter Rate Index

Source: Clarksons, Notos 09/2018

NOTOS NEWS | CONTAINER / LINER 8 OCTOBER 2018

2

M A N Y A C H A R T E R R A T E

S O F T E R , R I S I N G I D L E F L E E T

To get out of this predicament, some liner companies have reacted by cancelling services. The result is already being felt in the container charter market: While container charter rates have seen new highs in June and July this year, many have started to soften since. The graph below depicts the ConTex 1-year time charter rates for small to medium-sized container ships. Compared to their respective highs in summer, such charter rates have already dropped between seven to thirteen percent.

Furthermore, the number of idle boxships is again on the rise. According to Alphaliner, the ratio of idle capacity to the total fleet stood at 2% as of mid-September, up from below 1% seen a few months ago.

R I S I N G F U E L P R I C E S C O N T I N U E

T O P R E S S U R I Z E

Whereas the falling container charter rates somewhat ease the financial situation for liner shipping, ongoing pressure is expected to arise from the recently implemented US tariffs on Chinese imports which is bound to impair the container trade. The biggest impact, however, is to come from the continuously increasing bunker prices, which will most likely intensify as a result of the IMO 2020 regulations.

The oil price (Brent) recently surpassed the USD/barrel 86-mark, the highest level in nearly four years. We expect this to translate into further increasing bunker prices, thereby partly eliminating the solace provided by decreasing charter rates.

Furthermore, liner companies are expected to suffer from the higher expenses incurred through the IMO’s low-sulphur fuel regulations which come into effect in 2020. Maersk, CMA CGM, MSC and Hapag Lloyd are reported to belong to the number of liner companies which intend to pass on this extra cost to their clients. It remains to be seen how successful these companies will be in doing so.

Source: EIA, Notos Group 08/2018

4.000

6.000

8.000

10.000

12.000

14.000

16.000

01/14 06/14 11/14 04/15 09/15 02/16 07/16 12/16 05/17 10/17 03/18 08/18

USD/

d

1 - Y E A R T I M E C H A R T E R R A T E S F O R S M A L L T O M E D I U M - S I Z E D B O X S H I P SH I T T H E I R H I G H S I N E A R L Y S U M M E R

1,700 TEU 2,500 TEU 3,500 TEU 4,250 TEUSource: VHBS, Notos 10/2018

NOTOS NEWS | CONTAINER / LINER 8 OCTOBER 2018

3

C O N T A I N E R S T O C K S : N A V I O S

M A R I T I M E C O N T A I N E R S ’ U S I P O

D I D N O T W O R K

Higher fuel prices and the intensifying US-Sino trade conflict seem to weigh down on equity investors’ sentiment. Navios Maritime Containers failed at its USD 100m US initial public offering in September. Navios Maritime Containers is currently listed on Norway’s over-the-counter exchange and aimed to bring a fleet of 25 feeder containerships to the Nasdaq stock exchange. TradeWinds

reported that by company’s own account, Navios Maritime Containers will resume its listing in Norway and seek to list shares directly in the US.

C O N T A I N E R - A N D L I N E R -

S E C T O R S M O V E D O W N W A R D S

Looking at our sector index for container stocks one can see that the container index (light blue line in below graph) gained nearly 45 percent moving from the low of 85 index points in November 2017 to the high of over 120 index points in June this year.

This move was mainly driven by Seaspan, having been able to clinch a deal with a new cornerstone investor which in turn brought back confidence. It seems that this was a one-time effect reflecting a

Seaspan-specific issue and not a sector-wide development.

However, the clouds are turning darker. We wait to see how the container lessor companies like Costamare, Danaos, Global Ship Lease, MPC Containers or Seaspan withstand the mounting pressure from the liner companies once the full IMO 2020 effect kicks in.

Source: Notos 09/2018

Source: Notos Group 08/2018

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

09/17 11/17 01/18 03/18 05/18 07/18

Inde

x Po

ints

N O T O S L I N E R V S . C O N T A I N E R I N D I C E S - 1 2 M O N T H S

Liner Container

Source: Notos 10/2018

NOTOS NEWS | CONTAINER / LINER 8 OCTOBER 2018

notos-group.com

DISCLAIMER This document has been prepared and approved by Notos Consult GmbH and is for informational purpose only. The information presented in this report is intended for the recipient to whom it was delivered. Reproduction or distribution of this document in whole or in part is not permitted without the express written consent of Notos Consult GmbH.

This document contains forward-looking statements. We caution the reader that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Past returns are no indication of future returns. The development of the industry, markets and companies described in this document, may differ materially from the forward-looking statement contained herein.

Information and opinions contained in this document have been compiled from sources believed to be reliable. Unless otherwise stated, any statements herein are based on our own estimates at the time of publication. Notos Consult GmbH makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information contained herein and accepts no liability for loss arising from the use of the information provided.

This document is not an offer of any kind. This report has been prepared separately from any proposed offering of any security and as such information herein must not be relied upon as having been authorized or approved by the issuer of such security.

PUBLISHER

NOTOS CONSULT GMBH BALLINDAMM 17 20095 HAMBURG GERMANY

CONTACT

T +49 40 6094 550 – 0 F +49 40 6094 550 – 92 [email protected]

REGISTERED OFFICE: HAMBURG REGISTRATION COURT: AMTSGERICHT HAMBURG | HRB 120813

MANAGING DIRECTORS:

DR. JENS ROHWEDER DR. CHRISTINA STAHN