Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
52A15SEeai5 2.5353 DORION 010
NORANDA EXPLORATION COMPANY , L] M l TED
(no p c r o n a ] liability)
REPORT
l' P K l P N - T O W N S H l P
THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION
THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO DECEMBER, 1982
JOHN W. LONDRYGEOLOG]ST
NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO DIVISION
3.S3S2 DORION 010C
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 LOCATION
3.0 CLAIMS
4.0 ACCESS
5.0 HISTORY
6.0 TOPOGRAPHY
7.0 GEOLOGY
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY
PAGE
l
l
l
l
4
4
4
9
10
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE l LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2 CLAIM MAP (l" = 1/2 mile)
FIGURE 3 TOPOGRAPHY (1:50,000)
FIGURE 4 GEOLOGY MAP (1:5,000)
FIGURE 5 SCHEMATIC SECTION
2
3
5
6
8
l.0 INTRODUCTION
During July of 1982 Noranda personnel carried out
a geological mapping program on the Cavern South 1-81 proper
ty. The exposure was poor and little lead-zinc mineralization
was found. However, because of the geologic setting and
lead-zinc mineralization in the vicinity, further evaluation
of the property is recommended.
2.0 LOCATION
The property is I6cated in Dorion Township in the
Thunder Bay Mining Division, approximately 75 kilometers
northeast of Thunder Bay, Ontario (Figure 1). The property
covers parts of Concession VI in Lots 12 and 11 of Dorion
Township (Figure 2).
3.0 CLAIMS (Figure 2)
The property consists of four contiguous claims,
all of which are registered in the name of Noranda Explora
tion Company, Limited. The claim numbers are as follows:
TB604354
TB604355
TB604357
TB604358
4.0 ACCESS
Access to the property is good by bush and second
ary roads from Highway 11-17 at Dorion, 6 kilometers to the
southeast (Figure 3).
5.0 HI. STORY
There has been no known work carried out on the
property, although lead-zinc mineralized float has been
report by Tanton (1931).
There are lead-zinc showings to the north and
south of the property which were examined by trenches and
pits in the late 1920's. The galena and sphalerite was
located in solution breccias along fault zones within the
diabase sills. The mineralization' varied from a few inches
to a few feet in width in fault zones that were followed for
up to 600 meters (Tan t on-l 93 l ).
6.0 TOPOGRAPHY
The immediate area of the property is dominated by
dissected diabase capped hills with relief of greater than
200 meters (Figure 3). The property is situated in one of
the valleys with steep sides. The valley has been cut over
and is now covered by a thick second growth of poplar, tag
alders and other shrubs, resulting in difficult walking.
7.0 GEOLOGY (Figure 4)
The geological mapping was conducted by means of
pace and compass traverses along claim lines, streams and
randomly packed lines. The exposure on the property is poor
except along the diabase cliffs. There is no exposure on the
valley floor and the foot of the valley walls are buried in
a heavy talus slope.
The Kama Hil.l Formation (Upper Sibley Group) are
the only sediments exposed on the property. It is thought,
however, that the Rossport formation sediments underlie the
valley floor. This belief is based on observations to the
north. The Kama Hill Formation was identified by its fine-
-grained, thinly bedded nature as well as being non-
calcereous. The sediments were a dark grey to red.
The sections (Figure 5) observed on the valley
walls are made up of a thick (70m) dark, coarse-grained
diabase- sill at the top, overlying the Kama Hill Formation.
The contact is quite sharp but is only seen locally because
of the talus cover. From observations to the north a second
major diabase sill (approximately 30m) is probably present
within the Kama Hill Formation. This second dyke is also
suggested by a break in the slope of the hill and by the red"
tinge of this diabase which was noted in pieces on the talus
slope.
The sediments in the area dip shallowly (4 to
20 ) in various directions. The fault zones and solution
breccias appear to strike in a northeasterly direction and
dip steeply to both the northwest and southeast.
A number of pieces of l ead-zinc mineral i zed float
were found along the stream in the valleys at the south end
of the property. Some of this float contained massive lead-
-zinc (20 "/o combined), barite and calcite in what appears to
be a solution breccia. No source of the float was found on
the property and it is thought that it originated from the
mineralized fault zone to the south.
A known, two foot wide fault and solution breccia
zone was located on the northeast side of the property in
the diabase sill. The breccia strikes roughly northeast with
narrow (less than 10cm) lense-like pods of lead-zinc mineral
ization.
8 - 0
There has been no significant economic mineraliza
tion found on the property. However, because of the impres
sive lead-zinc mineralization to the north and south of the
property, similar geological setting, possible faulting
through the property and probably being close to the granitic
basement it is recommended that further work be carried out.
The following program is therefore proposed:
a) A grid be established on the claims.
b) A magnetometer and VLF-EM surey be conducted
over the grid.
c) Humic geochemical samples be collected at 25-
meter intervals on the grid.
d) The property be remapped.
Respectfully submitted,
Noranda Exploration Company,
Limited
(no personal liability)
December, l 982
John W. L o n d f y
V
- 10 -
9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Tanton , T.L 1931: "Fort William and Port Arthur
and Thunder Cape Areas, Thunder
Bay District, Ontario", Geolog
ical Survey of Canada Memoir
167, 222p.
Ministry otNaturalResources
Ontario
Report of Work
(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
,/ jr^ -~) ~ff}
Instructions: Please type or print.- If number of mining claims traversed
exceeds space on this form, attach a list.
52A15SEM15 2.5352 DORION
Type of Survey(s) SI
GEOLOGICALClaim Holder's)
Noranda Exploration Company, LimitedAddress
Suite 400 - 55 -Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario M5E 1J4Survey Company l Date of Survey (from 8* to)
l 782 Noranda Exploration Company , Limited j Day j M O . \ vr . Day j MO. . vrName and Address of Author (of Geo Technical report)
J. W. Londry, P. O. Box 2656, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5G2
900A3A3.87 —
.5- ST3."Ifotal Miles of line Cut
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence!Special Provisions Davs oer
Geophysical !~! -Claim
For first survey: . -, | - Electromagnetic
Enter 40 days. (This . includes line cutting) . Magnetor, ie,er
For each additional survey: . -Radiometric using ihe same grid: i
- Other Enter 20 days (for each) ;
Geological
Geochemicai
Man Days ! Days per Geophysical c|aim
Complete reverse side : ,, , , Electromagnetic
and enter total(s) here
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
' Geological 7
GeocheTnical
Airborne Credits i Days per i Claim
Note: Special provisions Electromagnetic
credits do not apply ' " lo Airborne Surveys. Magnetometer
Radiometric
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed
Performed on Oaim(s)
Calc ulation of Expenditure Days Credits Total
Total Expenditures Days Credits
S - 15 -
nstr uctions Total Days Credits rnav t)e apportioned at the claim holdei S choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected n columns at right.
Date Recorded/JoldfOor Ager^ (Signature)
NOV. 17/82 -W} y yr\ 7 jf f (j^fA^^A ^\J -JL^g jf^f^H
Mining ClaimPrefix
TB
Number
.
"
" '
FoTotal Days Cr Recorded
Certification Verifying Report of Work [M ,... ,, ,
604354
604355
604357
604358
MINiNi
Expend. Days Cr,
:-
!Vf C
U\L4J
J LAN )S
r Office Use OnlvDateRecorded
^ -4^7 'vtfty
Mining ClaimPrefix [ Number
ftl
82
SECTII 3N
Tota! number ot mining claims coveted hy this report of work.
Mining Recorder
j^y^t^^^^^(St-
-
Expend. Days Cr.
-
...
"4
3Sfe
y//
. .'
•s
fCO*'i:.V
l l l
M.lel l1=3
THUNDER BAY DISTRICT
ONTARIOScale 1:50,000 Echelle
i 3 Mill.l
M.lieilOOOr'wrn f
Yofd.lOOOr "H H
1000 pOOO
1000 2000
3000 4000MJUITI
3000
-160
V- 3 -
V V
4136 ! Z t! 6 ! 5 Z t 3 f.
~T6~ 'P -'
GCC"5S77 , 6C29JJ
f 029?*
o o
E'.i971 60-976
0 0
CCJ94I
re
f c ; 9 * t
o :?"
Tt
Tb
50-Jir f '604311
Tr , TP
T f
f ''^ 9 i c '
T6
603927
-jri^a^A.
o
o O
SCALE -1 INCH - 40 CHAINS -Q
-iCOC
TOWNSH P
DORION
- 8 -
4-0 w
f) /ft 6 ase
SOUTH
''s-, S
Ministryof GeotechnicalNatural D^~^^*Resources RePort
OnTario Approval
File
Mining Lands Comments
D To: Geophysics
Comment!
II Approved |~) With to see again with correctionsDate Signature
To: Geology - Expenditures
Comment*
[Approved [~| With to lee again with correctioni
D
Date Signatu
To: Geochemistry
Comments
Q Approved Q Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature
l [TO: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)
1593(81/10)
1983 01 26
370
2,5352
Mrs. Audrey HayesMlnlgg RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6
Dear Madam:
We have received reports and maps for a Geological Survey submitted on Mining Claims TB 604354 et al 1n the Township of Dorion.
This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.
Yours very truly,
E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380
DM: se
cc: Noranda Exploration Co Limited Toronto, Ontario
cc: Mr. J.W. Londry Thunder Bay, Ontario
Noranda Exploration Company, Limited(no persona/ liability)
P.O. Box 2656 Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5G2
noranda
MfcDJanuary 11, 1983
Mr. E. F. Anderson, Director ^ SJfiC^Lands Administration Branch ifc^ Ministry of Natural Resources *\V\^ Room 6450, Whitney Block *^ Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3
RE: Claim Numbers TB 604354, et al
Dear Sir:
Find enclosed Technical Data Statement, report and maps in duplicate for a geological survey reported on these claims.
Yours truly,
Jim Tomchick
JT:cmbc.c. 614-Cavern South 1-81
Audrey Hayes
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
CA D
bk b O
Type of Siirvey(s) GEOLOGICAL
Township or Area Dorion Township, G — 651
Claim Holder(s)Nor anda Exploration Company, I.imit-pH
Ste. 400-55 Yonge St., Toronto—————
Survey Compan^ oranda Exploration Hnmpanyj I. -f m i t- o H
Author of Report John Lnndry——————^^^—^—————————
Address of Author Box 2656, Th unrip r Ray ; On f-.——————
Covering Dates of Survey July, 1982^—^—.^^^^—^-—.(linecutting to office)
Total Miles of Line Cut —^^^——^^—————————^—^^^—.
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer...—Radiometric———Other.—————
DAYS per claim
Geological.Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
Magnetometer Electromagnetic Radiometric
HATR- Jan. l l /83
(enter days per claim)
sir.N ATI T
Res. Geol.. . Qualifications c) . l 3 Q |
Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
......(prefix)
.6,0.4.3.5.6.... (number)
604355
604357
604358
l
TOTAL CLAIMS.
837 (5/79)
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations.
Station interval.—— Profile scale——^—
.Number of Readings
.Line spacing ———
Contour interval.
Instrument.Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ———
OHH
Hta 2;
H U
w
InstrumentCoil configuration Coil separation —- Accuracy .-————
Method: Frequency^———
Parameters measured.
CD Fixed transmitter Shoot back C3 In line d Parallel line
(specify V.L.F. station)
Ht—i
lO
Instrument
Scale constant
Corrections made.
Base station value and location.
Elevation accuracy.
z;O H
OH
Q
U
Q
tt
Instrument -^———————
Method D Time Domain
Parameters — On time .^^
— Off time ___
— Delay time ———-
— Integration time.
CD Frequency Domain
_ Frequency _____
_ Range .^^-————.
Power.
Electrode array —
Electrode spacing .
Type of electrode
SELF POTENTIAL
Instrument.-—-————-———-^—^——---—--^—^———-—^-—-————-—.^^——. Range. Survey Method .—————————————————^—-^-—-.^————^^^-.--^——.-.—
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRIC
Instrument.Values measured .
Energy windows (levels) .-——————-—^^—-—.—^——.-—-^-———^—-—.—^^-—.—
Height of instrument____________________________Background Count. Size of detector ^—-..-^-^^—-^--^^-————.—---^——^^—-^——^^————^———^
Overburden ——^——^^——^———————-^———————..——————.———.-——(type, depth — include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey——————^——————^—^——^—Instrument -———————^——————^^-^^————— Accuracy.^^———————^^^———————^—^——-——Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survcy(s) ——— Instrument(s) ——————
(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy————-——————————..
(specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used—^^-^—-————-——.^-^—————————-—.^—Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude_________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area—.^—^—.^^—^—.——.—.—.—^-——Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material)
Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————
Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain—————————
Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent
p. p.m. p. p. b.
DnD
Cu, Pb,
Others—
Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)
Field Analysis {~Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used__
Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ___________
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ———.
Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——
Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method .——Reagents Used ————
.tests)
.tests)
-tests)
General- General.
\
l
(5UJ
x o
UJ UJctCD
UJ
^1 z:cz
V
-GLEN TWP. G-
x vSTIRLING TWP. G
IV
14
13
12
j: PROV. \NPARtt
L 1615258 f6IS2S9 N ^
04974 .60497KI lS04976
6031*42 6039'41604977 )603933
603928 '645JB3 1645384
605927 645^82 l
4CANYON 1
Dorion Landing
685579 685576 685573 1686502
85578 |685577 685572 i68650I J666SO5 I686508J ,-
677454 I67V453 1677452 l 677451
6-77439 i 677438 . 677437 t 677436677438 j 677437 677436TB T8 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ̂ fc'~ ~
I7I5II2TB [TB |TB
|686\555 (686540
7I5I1J |7I5I06)(7I5I03 J7I5IJ2 j 7I5097 | 68 6 527
7I5094P7I5095L- ~ ~ _l — — ̂ *i2. ia.?—
7I51I7 I7I5H4 |7f5l09 | 715I08 7.5105 l 715100686 53O^| 6 86537 886538 J 6 86 5 45
Macintosh L.
Little Macintosh L.
lack Boy
e Superior
Mackenzie L )
MCTAVISH TWP. G-
SAND AND GRAVEL
GRAVEL ———————————————FILE 63370
DATE OF ISSUE
Minis'.ry of Na'.ura! Resources TORONTO
LAND UNDER WATERS OF LAKE SUPERIOR WITHDRAWN
FROM STAKING BY ORDER IN COUNCIL DATED APRIL 30th,
1912. * .
LEGENDHIGHWAY AND ROUTE No
OTHER ROADS
TRAILS u
SURVEYED LINES TOWNSHIPS, BASE L'NFS, ETC LOTS, MINING CLAIMS PARCELS, ETC
UNSURVEVEDLINESLOT LINES
. PARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC
RAILWAY ANU RIGHT OF WAY UTILITY LINES NON-PERENNIAL STREAM FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARSH OR MUSKEGMINES
TRAVERSE MONUMENT
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS
TYPE OF DOCUMENT
PATENT, SURFACE 81 MINING RIGHTS
, SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY-...,
, MINING RIGHTS ONLY ....^
LEASE,SURFACE Si MINING RIGHTS..
" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY......." , MINING RIGHTS ONLY.........
LICENCE OF OCCUPATION .^......,..
ORDER-1N-GOUNCIL ........,.........^
RESERVATION .............,.,.......,
CANCELLED ,...........,^.......,.
SAND S GRAVEL ...
SYMBOL
e e
—— H—. y—. Y—.. OC
NOTE: MINING RIGHTS IN PARCELS "A TENTED PRIOR TO MAY 6. 1913, VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC LANDS ACT RSO 1970 CHAP 380, SEC 63. SUfiSEC 1
SCALE : 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS
O i OOO 2OOO 4OOO 6OOO 80OO
\ 52A15SE8815 2.5352 DORION S00
O ?00M E T ft L::,
l OOO' ' KM)
2 OOO (2 KM)
TOWNSHIP
DORION TWPM.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
THUNDER BAYMINING DIVISION
THUNDER BAYLAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION
THUNDER BAYMinistryof LandNatural ManagementResources Branch
Ontario
Oil*MARCH 1982
Number
G-651