e'e NRC DISTRIBUTION FOR PART 50 DOCKET MATERIAL(TEMPORARY FORM)

CQNTRQL NQ.

FILE'ROM.

LeBoeuf,Lamb,Leiby 6 MacWashingtog, D.C, 20036

11-4-75 11-14-75

BATE OF DOC DATE REC'D LTR TWX RPT OTHER

TO:Mr. B.C. Rusche

CLASS UNCLASS PROP INFO

ORIG3 sign'ed

INPUT

CC OTHER

37

NO CYS REC'D

40

SENTNRC PDR

SENT LOCAL PDR

DOCKET NO:

50-220

XXI c

DESCRIPTION: Ltr submitted on behalf of NiagaMohqawk Power Corp. trans the following':

NOTE: ATTACHMENT A,6'B NOT~~PROPRIETARY'�

, ~ ~ .ATTACHMENT C,WATINGON TRANSMITTERS LETTER ~ ~ ~ (PROPRIETAR

««LI'>e',levtte'~>I/~l'/ ging'1:htqgypPLANT NAME: Nine Mile Pt. Unit 1

ENCLOSURES: Amdt to Appl for Amdt to TechSpecs notarized 11-3-75 consists of

. Attachment A containing Proposed.-Changeto Tech-Specs. &:P,ttahcment B furn supplino to. Loss of Coolant Accident Analysis...(40 cys encl rec'd)-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE dated'1-4»75 showingsvc of Amdt.to"Tech Specs upon Mr. R. P; JonesSupr. Town of Scribe, Oswego, N.Y.....ete al..

1'Or c en 1 rec'd

BUTLER (L)W/ Copies

CLARK (L)W/ Copies

PARR (L)*I „' W/ Copies

KNI EL '(L)W/ Copies

REID(L)W/ COPIES

REGAN (E)W/ Copies

PLEA+ (L)W opies

SPIESW/ Copie~

W/ opuses

ZlEMANN (L)W/ Copies

DICKER (E)W/ Copies

KNIGHTON (E)W/ Copies ~

YOUNGBLOOD (E)W/ Copies

SCHWENCER (L)W/ Copies

STOLZ (L)W/ Copies

VASSALLO (L)W/ Copies,.

PURPLE (L)*

W/ Copies

INTERNALDISTR I BUTION

FOR ACTION INFORMATION DHL 11-15-75

~ Ile/ ssr'r1«w

FIL TECH REVIEW'$P" (,. SCHROEDER.,~

GC, ROOM P-506;4 MACCARYOSSICK/STAFF KNIGHT

CASE itPAWLICK I

GIAMBUSSO "'IAOBOYD STE LLOMOORE (L) HOUSTONDEYOUNG (L) NOVAKSKOVHOLT (L) ROSS

=- GOLLER (L) (Ltr) IPPOLITOP. COLLINS TEDESCODENISE J COLLINS

'.;.'„Ir ! REG OFR - ~ 'A'INAS" ~ILE St REGION (2) BENAROYA< "1 ..seMIPC VOLLMER

DENTON LIC ASSTG R I MES R.,DI GGS (L)GAMMILL H. GEAR IN (L)KASTNER E. GOULBOURNE (L)BALLARD P„KREUTZER (E)

"SPANGLER J. LEE (L)M.RUSHBROOK(L)

ENVIRO S. REED (E)MULLER M. SERVICE (L)DICKER S. SHEPPARD (L)KNIGHTON M. SLATER (E)

~ YOUNGBLOOD H. SMITH (L)REGAN IC. TEETS (L)

QJECT LDR G'. WILLIAMS(F-)CAN@ 4; WILSON (L)

H Ag'-ESS R. INGR '~/I (L)M. DUNCAN

A/T IND ~

BRAITMAPfy)j;(~"., ( j,SALTZMAN a

'ELTZ

PLANSMCDONALDCHAPMANDUBE (Ltr)E. COUPE e, „

PETERSONHARTFIELD (2)KLECKEREISENHUTe„;«.- » An'" /

WIGG INTONI... ~

~ .- jttshIs

EXTERNAL DISTR I BUTIONH—LOCALPDR~~~, N.Y.Of —TIC (ABERNATHY) (1)(2)(10) —NATIONALLABSH —NSIC (BUCHANAN) 1 —W. PENNINGTON, Rm E-201 GT

1 —ASLB 1 —CONSULTANTSBet -e Newton Anderson NEWMARK/8LUME/AGBABIAN

gyACRS~~SENT gott gsg,~

~ ~

1 —PD R-SAN/LA/NY1 —BROOKHAVEN NAT LAB1 —G. ULRIKSON ORNL

~ ~

~ + ~

~ < ~

0 'I

4

C

~ ~ ~ ~

~ 0 ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~1

LEBOEUF, LAMB,LEIBY8 MACRAlg4g0tII)otIt DOClRt OILS

I757 N STREET, N. W.

WAsHINGTQN,D. C. 20036ARVIN E. UPTONLEONARD M. TROSTENWILLIAMO. DOUGCUGENE B THOMAS'RHARRY H. VOIGTL. MANNING MUNTZINGLEX K. LARSONHENRY V. NICKEL

WASHINOTON PARTNERS

November 4, 1975

I40 BROADWAYN CW YOR K~ N ~ Y. I BOO 5

WASHINOTON TELEPHONE202-872-SBBS

CABLE ADDRCSSLALALU,WASHINGTON D. C.

TKLCXI440274

Mr, Ben C, RuscheDirectorOffice of Nuclear Reactor

RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commis sionWashington, D.C. 20555

ZDV 14875.II,S, NIIaSAK S~nr.ATTY

COMMIS S IDN

Re: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporati.onNine Mile Point Nuclear StationUnit No. 1

'- D'o'ck'et: No.'50-'220'

Dear Mr. Rusche:

On October 31, 1975, Niagara Mohawk,,PowerCorporati;on filed with the 'Commission certain changesto facility technical specificati'ons'ade necessary asa result of analyses conducted by the General Electric

'ompany pursuant to Section 50.46 and Appendix K to 10C.F.R. Part 50 of the Commission's regulations.

Additional changes to the attachments accompanying that application are now necessary., This let-.ter, therefore, transmits three (3) signed originalsand nineteen (19) copies of an HAmendment to Applica-tion for Amendment to Technical Speci.fications" to-gether with 40 copies of those 'pages of Attachments AIB and C which have been amended.

Since some of the changes concern whatGeneral Electric deems to be proprietary mateiial,Niagara Mohawk requests that this -"amended material bewithheld from- public disclosure in accordance with the"Application to Withhold Material from the Public Record" also filed on October 31.

Il

f

«",.e') >„A ~

'TE

I

1

0

A Certificate of Service showing service ofthese documents, with the exception of the materialconsidered to be proprietary, upon the persons listedtherein is also enclosed.

Very truly yours/

4,5~, 4u I, Ii&(s ~&-LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby 6 MacRaeAttorneys for Niagara Mohawk

Power Corporation

j%

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

rLfiy~,,APltss'eH roRyI~I

In the Matter ofR'egulatory Docket File'

)NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION )(Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station }

Unit No. 1) )

Docket No. 50-220

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a document

entitled "Amendment to Application for Amendment to

Technical Specifications" by mailing a copy thereof

first class, postage prepaid, to the following persons

this 4th day of November, 1975.

Mr. Robert P. JonesSupervisorTown of ScribaR. D. 54Oswego, New York 13126

Miss Juanita KerseyLibrarianOswego City Library120 E. Second StreetOswego, New York 13126

Dr. William E. SeymourStaff CoordinatorNew York State Atomic

Energy CouncilNew York State Department

of Commerce99 Washington AvenueAlbany, New York 12210

ape M. Babcock

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby 6 MacRaeAttorneys for Applicant

Bg

lh'g

i"Ã 'jj yy lt

)'I

S

llh

CI $ ~g p,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

gegulatory Docket File

In the Matter of ))

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION(Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station )

Unit No. 1) )

Docket No. 50-220

AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT

TO

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Pursuant to Sections 50.46(a), 50.59(c) and 50.90 of the

regulations of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Niagara Mohawk,

holder of Facility Operating License No. DPR-63, requested on October

31, 1975 that Section 3.1.7 of the Technical Specifications set forth

in Appendix A to that License be amended.

In support of that application proposed Technical Specification

changes together with a safety analysis were transmitted as Attachment

A, B and C respectively to that application.- Additional changes to

that submittal were found to be necessary. This amended application

transmits amended pages.

l

0

These changes do not alter the conclusion that the proposed

change to the Technical Specifications will not authorize any change

in the types or any increase in the amounts of effluents or any

increase in the authorized power level of the facility.

Since some of these'changes concern a document deemed by the

General Electric Company to contain proprietary information, Niagara

Mohawk Power Corporation requests that these changed pages be withheld

from public disclosure pursuant to the Application To Withhold Material

From The Public Record filed with the Commission on October 31, 1975.

WHEREFORE, Applicant respectfully requests that Appendix A

to Facility Operating License No. DPR-63 be amended in the form attached

hereto as Attachment A.

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION

Gerald K.oHe'ice

President - Engineering

Subscribed and sworn to beforeme this 8L< day of November,1975.

Notary Public+OR

IA C,melsilon txPlresY

ll

gegutatoty Docket BL8

ATTACHMENT A

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

License No. DPR - 63

Docket No. 50-220

Proposed Change to Technical Specifications

Item

Limiting Condi tionfor Operation 3.1.7a

Location

Pages 66 and 68

~Chan e

Replace Figures 3. 1.7band d with the attachedFigures 3.1.7b and.d.

17NINE MILE POINT UNIT 1

16

15

14

12

10

0 S I000 10,000 1S,000 20>000 2S,000 30,000

AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (AD/T)

FIGURE 3.1.7b MAXIMUMALLOl~'ABLE AVERAGE PLANAR LIIGR"""«~~<<t t'I'A FUEL TYPE 2 - RELOAD 1

~~ ~

7

~ ~

17NINE hlIl,E POINT UNIT 1

15

13

12

90 S,000 10i000 1Si000 20i000 'Sp000

AVERAGE Pl.ANAR EXPOSURE (WD/T)

30,000

FIGURE 3.1 ~ 7d MAXIMUh1 ALLOl"ABLE AVERAGE PLANAR LllGRAPPLICiNLE TO FUL'L TYPE 4 - RElLOAD 3 (GL'NERIC C)

I

ATTACHMENT 8 g.gtdatory 00ckst die

Loss of Coolant Accident Analysis

Supplementary InformationEzcc)~73,lv/gfz g~]g m .~Qg

The information transmitted in this document supplements the lossof coolant accident analysis submitted on October 31, 1975. The revisedcurves and tables presented in this attachment and Attachment C replacesimilar information previously noted as preliminary. In addition, Figures3.1.7b and d of Attachment A of the October 31, 1975 submittal have beenrevised.

Please replace the following pages of the October 31, 1975 submittal:

Attachment A

Figure 3.1.7bFigure 3.1.7d

Attachment 8

Table 1

Table 2Figure 8-2Figure 8-3AFigure 8-38Figure 8-3CFigure 8-3DFigure 8-3EFi gur e 8-48Figure 8-4D

Attachment C

Figure A-laFigure A-lbFigure A-lcFigure A-ldFigure A-1 gFigure A-lhFigure A-2dFigure A-2iFigure A-2jFigure A-2kFigure A-21

All other parts of the October 31, 1975 loss of coolant accidentsubmittal remain the same.

i

TABLE 1

SIGNIFICANT INPUT PARAMETERS TO THE

LOSS OF COOLANT ACCIDENT ANALYSIS

PLANT PARANETERS:

Core Thermal Power

Vessel Steam Output

Vessel Steam Dome Pressure .

Recirculation Line Break AreaFor Large Breaks

Recirculation Line Break AreaFor Small Breaks

1887 Slt which corresponds to

102 '5 of licensed core power+

.7.47 x 106 Lbm/h which corresponds to

102 Ã of licensed core power

~1045 sia

(DBA) (.8DBA) (.6DBA)5.446, 4.357, 3.268, and 1 ft .

~ 0 07 0 2 0 5 1 0 ft2

FUEL PARAMETERS:

FUEL TYPE

Initial Core

Reload 1

Rel oad 2

Reload 3

Reload 4

FUEL BUNDLEGEOMETRY

7x7

7x7

7x7

7x7

8x8

DESIGNLINEAR HEAT

GENERATION RATE

(kw/ft)

17.5

17.5

17. 5

17.5

13.4

DESIGN AXIAL .

PEAKING FACTOR

1.57

1.57

1.57

1.57

1.57

INITIAL**'MIN. POWER

RATIO

1.19

1.19

1.19

1.19

1.19

A more detailed list of input of each model and its source is presented inSe cti on I I of Re feren ce 1.

*This power level satisfies the Appendix K requirement of 102Ã. The core heatupcalculation assumes a bundle power consistent with operation of the highestpowered rod at 102K of its maximum (technical specification) linear heat generationr ate.

** Used in dryout correlation.

1 I

TABLE 2

APPENDIX K RESULTS

NINE MILE .POINT UNIT 1

BREAK SPECTRUM WALYSIS

Break Size LocationWorst Single

FailureSystems of Benefit

Durin LOCA ~pCT oF)

Core-Wi dePeak Local Metal-WaterOxidation à Reaction 5

a. 5.446 ft2(DBA)

b. 4..357 ft (.8DBA)

c. 3.268 ft (.6DBA)

d. 1.0 ft2(Worst Break) 7x7

e. 0.5 ft2

f. 0.2 ft2

Recirc. Suction

'ecirc.Recirc.

Recirc.

Suction1

Suction1

Suction

Recirc. Suction

Recirc. Suction

.Emergency Condenser

Emergency Condenser

Emergency Condenser

Emergency Condenser

Emergency Condenser

Emergency Condenser

2CS+OEC+AOS

2CS+OEC+ADS

2CS+OEC+ADS

2CS+OEC+ADS

2CS+OEC+ADS

2CS+OEC+AOS

2040

2040

2040.

2090

2200

21952

12

12

12

14

17

17

0.5

0.5

g. 0.07 ft2{Iaogs( B{ eak)

h. 0.275 ft2

i. 0.567 ftj.. 2.598 ft2

k. 0.448 ft

1 0 1 ft2

Recirc. Suction

Core Spray Line

Feed~eater Line

Main Steamline

Emer. CondenserSteam Line

Emer. CondenserSteam Line

Emergency Condenser

Emergency Condenser

Emergency Condenser

Emergency Condenser

1CS+1EC+AOS

2CS+1EC+ADS

2CS+1EC+AOS

2CS+OEC+ADS

Emergency Condenser 'CS+OEC+ADS

Emergency Condenser 2CS+OED+ADS 2200

1860

1300(No Uncgvery)

1870

(No Uncovery)2

(IIo Uncovery)2

15 0.5

NOTES: 1 At junction of an emergency condenser return.2 CHASTE - large break methods

I ~ ~

FIGURE B-2

PEAK CLADDI.'iG TEMPERATURE

PEAK LOCAL OXIDATIO'.i VERSUS BREAK AREA

2500

EMERGENCY CONDEti'SER FAILURE (ALL BREAKS)

RECIRCULATION LINE BREAK ~e

I0

2000

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION

~CORE SPRAY LINE BREAK

1500

C

M1000 FEEINATER LINE BREAK

MAIN STEAMLINE-BREAK-

500

NOTE: THE FEEDWATER LINE BREAK AND THEEMERGENCY CONDENSER STEAM LINE BREAKSDID NOT UNCOVER.

.02 .05 0.1 0.2 0.5

BREAK AR"-A (FT2)

1.0 2.0I ~

ShlUh/B iNO. 20535, 2543LOG NO. SC374, SC378 NINE MILE POINT UNIT 1

~ ~

2200

2100

2000

~ s 10008

1800

12000 iU>

l I I

S>oop 10,000 ~ Is,ooo 20,000 2S,UOP

~ ~ PI.Al>AR AVI!Rh(ill I>XPOSIIRI! (Ni'>I/l)

FIGURE'-'3A PEAK 'CLADDING. TEMPERATURE VERSUS''PLANAR AVERAGE EXPOSURE

I'Ilin

12.0

'11.0 10.9 11.0

>> 0fQ c)

IJ P;10.0

~ g

~ Ms4

9.0

0..2 10. 1 10. 110.2

8.00 S,ono 1O,OPO . I S,pn0 20,UUU

PI.ANAR AU:RAI:I! I:XI'0!>URI> (bNJ/t)

2S >UUU SU, lRii)

FIGURE B-4A h!AXIhfUh! AVERAGE PLANAR 1.INEAR I!EAT GENERATION RATL'h!APLIIGR)VERSUS P! A.>AR AV!!RAGE !'.XPOS(IR!'.

SNUhlB NO. 18843!.OG NO. SC373

FUEL TYPE 1 - INITIAL CORE

NINE MILE POINT UNIT 1

* ~

2200

2)00

2000

l!IOO

)600

)7005,000 ) 0,000 ~ ) S,ooo 20 >nno

Rl AIIAI( AVI!Rh(il'IXI05IIRI'I ('N'>'>I/(~

2.,non 50 >(nln

FIGURE 8-38 PEAK CLADDING TEMPERATURE VERSUS PLANAR AVERAGE EXPOSURE

) 2.0

)).n] 0 7

1 0 . 8

>> Q>Q }

a t ~ M~

:JH Q

~>.''l

)0.010.3

7500 10.210.1

12500

10.0 10.0 10.0

0.0

8.00 5,000 )p,rloo )5,nno 2O,onn

I l>A>XAl( AVI RA(il) LIXI'ORUI(ll (N(J/( )

25>onn 50 >non

FIGURE 8-48 hQXIhHJhl AVERAGE PI.ANAR LINEAR ill'.AT. GENL'RATION RATE (MAPLI~GR)

VERSUS PI.ANAR AV!!RAG>E EXPOSURE

SNUMB NO. 21285LOG NO. SC375 FUEL TYPE 2 - RELOAD 1

NINE hfILE POINT UNIT 1

0

1

2200

2100

c2

2000

(0

1!)OO

VIaoo 10

~ I ~

12000 5 >OOO IO,OOO IS,OOO 2l),()OO "s,i)oo

PI.ANAII AVI!!Ih(illI:.XPOsl)IO! (b)l''iljt)FIGURE B-3C PEAK. CLADDING TEMPERATURE VERSUS PLANAR AVERAGE"EXPOSURE

0

., 12.0

alr

11. 0

10.7 10.6

PQ L

+W t ~

,a Pw QJ

r'

t''J

10.00.0

9 8 9 8'9.9

9.0

II.0

S,O))0 10,0()O 15,000 20, l)OO

~ ~ ~

Pl Al(AI! A'l'I'IIAG)i Ii'(P05U)ill (N)'d/l )

25,OOO 50, lilil)

FIGURE B-4ChIAXIhIUhI AVERAGf: PI,ANAR LINI'.AR IIEAT GENfRATION RATE (hIAPLHGR)Vl!RSUS PI,ANAR AVI!RA(ill I:XPOSURI!

SNUMB NO 23433LOG NO. SC378 FUEL TYPf: 3 -RELOAD 2 (GENERIC A)

NINI'. MII.II POIN'I'NIT 1

~ ~ ~ p ~

I0

220C

2100

2000

).'Iuu'l0

)soo lo

) 2000 30, ,'1cln

I c

5,ooo IO,OOO ~ )5,000 2o,oon 25,000

a I'I.ALII AVI:IIh('ll IIXP05IIIIII (.'I'.c'cl/I )

FIGURE B-3D PEAK CLADDING TEMPERATURE VERSUS PLANAR AVERAGE EXPOSURE

. )2.0

SJ

'11.0

10.0

10.2

10.0

10.6

10.210.0

9.99.9 9.9

1 0.0

8.05,Olin )0,000 )5,000 20,000

PI,A',IAII A'0:III(:II I!XI'05UI!Lc ()»'cl/I)

25,uuo iu,ouo

FlGURE 8-4D hSXIh/UW AVERAGE PLAVAR LIVEAR tIEAT GENERATION RATE (hg,PL}lGR)VERSUS PLANAR AVERAGL'XPOSURE

SNUhS NO. 21265LOG NO. 5C376

FUEL TYPE 4 - RELOAD 3 (GENERIC (

NINE htI LL'OINT UNIT 1

~ lg '

l

f7

2200

ra.0

2100

2000

l!000

V1800

~r n

tS

1A

R U

Io

l 2000 S,OOO lo,notl ls,ooo 20,0t)0 000

I

0

PI,AIIAIt A'VIIIIAOI! II'XI'OSUI\I: (bl'r'rl/t)

FIGURE B-3E PEAK CLADDING TEMPERATURE VERSUS PLANAR AVERAGE EXPOSURE

. 12.0

JC

Qta7 I«

w ~J ~

s~~~ '1~,

!!,'Q

~ lE

Il.n

Io.o

9.08.5

8.6 8.7 8.7 8.6 8.6 '.58.0

1400

8.5

5, O(IO

11200

ln >000 I 5,0(ro 20,0tri>

PI.A'tAIt A'0 ItAAI I;Ir'I'OSUI,'I! ('Ss!I/I)

2S,Otr0 5O ~ r rlrl

FIGURE B-4E hIAXIhIUhI AVERAGE PI.ANAR LI'IEAR IIEAT GENERATLON RATE (MAPLHGR)Vl'.RSUS PLANAR AVI'.RA(rI'. I XPOSURI'.

SNUB NO. 20535LOG NO. Sc374

FUEL TYPE 5 AND 6NINI! hlII.I! I'OINT lNIT 1

%'>yJ P ~

l \, r

f