39
Nikos Mattheos Centre for Oral Health Sciences Malmo, Sweden 2000 New dimensions in Distance Learning

Nikos Mattheos Centre for Oral Health Sciences Malmo, Sweden 2000 New dimensions in Distance Learning

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Nikos MattheosCentre for Oral Health SciencesMalmo, Sweden

                                        

     

2000

New dimensions in Distance Learning

Cyber learning communities

Internet classroom

Virtual Learning Environments

Integrated Distance Learning Environments

e-learning

Web- based learning

Virtual Classrooms

Virtual Learning Environments

Or

Virtual Classrooms

Main Entry: vir·tu·alPronunciation: 'v&r-ch&-w&l, -ch&l; 'v&rch-w&lFunction: adjectiveEtymology: Middle English, possessed of certain physical virtues, from Medieval Latin virtualis, from Latin virtus strength, virtueDate: 16541 : being such in essence or effect though not formally recognized or admitted <a virtual dictator>2 : of, relating to, or using virtual memory3 : of, relating to, or being a hypothetical particle whose existence is inferred from indirect evidence <virtual photons> -- compare REAL 3

© 1997 by Merriam-Webster, IncorporatedPublished under license with Merriam-Webster, Incorporated

Student – tutor

Student – student

Student – learning resources

In the Classroom…

tutor

students

Learning resources

Interaction

The network environment that can facilitate similar kinds of interaction as in a traditional classroom.

Home

Students

Home

Students

Home

Teachers

                 

Rolf Attström, DDS, PhDProfessor and chairman, dept of PeriodontologyCentre for Oral health Sciences, Malmö, Sweden

CV Homepage e-mail links

William F. Wathen, DMDVice President, Center for Professional DevelopmentThe Texas A&M University SystemBaylor College of DentistryCV Homepage e-mail links

Students

Home

Teachers

Admin.

Course syllabus

Calendar

On-Line Registration

Addressbooks

Admission requirements

Students

Home

Teachers

Admin.

Bar !Bulletin board

Chat

Virtual beers

News

Homepages

SMS service

Synchronous communication tools

Asynchronous communication tools

Sharing of programmes and documents

On-line libraries, Search engines

Special tools and CAL programmes

Audio telephone conference as has been used since 1960s:

Audiovisual teleconference:

•Integrated environment

•Simple equipment

•Affordable cost

Interaction in a typical teleconference session:

A Virtual Classroom allows the individual

student or professional to access the whole learning process from the comfort

of his/her home, with only a standard PC and a

reasonably fast Internet connection.

How do we build a Virtual Classroom?

•The expensive way..!

•The less expensive way..!

•The alternative way..!

How do we build a Virtual Classroom?

The expensive way..!

Server Programmers Time

Very high cost

Need for expert maintennance

-Tailor made environment

Possibility to share or sell the developed structure

+

How do we build a Virtual Classroom?

The less expensive way..!

Commercial packages:

Blackboard Convene Embanet eCollege.com

IntraLearn  Symposium TopClass WebCT

The Learning Manager WebMentor Lotus Lear. Space

Integrated Virtual Learning Environment (IVLE)

Softarc FirstClass LUVIT Virtual Workspace (MEVW)

IMSeries Asymetrix Librarian   Serf  Virtual-U  

eduprise.com

How do we build a Virtual Classroom?

The less expensive way..!

Commercial packages:

Quick

Easy interface

Technical support

+Limited adjustability

Need of expert maintenance

Platform dependency

Cost

-

How do we build a Virtual Classroom?

The alternative way:

Do it yourself..!

How do we build a Virtual Classroom?

The alternative way:

Do it yourself..!

Costs time

Limited control over freeware services

Need of evaluation of all offered options

Need for alternatives

-0 cost!

Reasonably adjustable

Easy to support

Functional

+

Students

Home

Teachers

Admin.

Bar !

What now?

Chat

Audioconference

On-line library

E-mail

Web boards

Search engines

Multimedia

THE SOUP MODEL !

Factors of importance in a Virtual Classroom

Before the course:

• the course determines the media – not vice versa.

•Make sure students and tutors can handle the technology

•Strict time planning – inform students and tutors on the time they must allocate to the course.

Factors of importance in a Virtual Classroom

During the course:

• New media – new methods! Employ active learning PBL, DKN

•Groupwork, team spirit, distribution of roles, peer evaluation.

•Explore the limitattions of the learning tools. Async. – Sync. Communication contribute in different ways.

•Don’t exclude personal contact.

•Continuos technical assistance

•Adjust the Virtual Classroom to the needs of participants.

•Emphasise on the feedback.

Factors of importance in a Virtual Classroom

After the course:

• Peer evaluation.

• Continuos evaluation of all stages

•Study the interaction – assess facts and figures

  1st chat 2nd chat

Actual duration * 20:15 – 21:23 68 min 20:25 – 21:31 66 min

Nr of Interactions** 101 (seq) # 77 (non seq) ##

120 (seq) (+ 18.8 %)

Interactions per minute 1,4 /min 1,8 /min (+ 28.5 %)

Tutor interactions: 48 (seq) (47,5 %) 49 (seq) (40,8 %)

Interactions per person 20,2 24

Total of non seq. interactions

14 12

Tutor non seq. inter 7 7

Student Interactions PC 22 21,7 % PC  

LE 15 14,8 % LE  

MF 9 8,9 % MF  

AO 5 5 % AO  

  PC,LE,MF,AO PC,MF,AO,LE

25 20,8%

11 9,1%

15 12,5%

18 15%

GROUP A

  1st chat 2nd chat

Actual duration * 20:21 – 22:23 73 min 21:10 – 22:23 73 min

Nr of Interactions** 95 154 (+ 62,1 %)

Interactions per minute 1,3 /min 2,1/min (+ 61,5 %)

Tutor interactions: 38 (40 %) 52 (33,7%)

Interactions per person 19 30,8

Total of non seq. interactionsTutor non seq. inter

Student Interactions Ce 22 21,7 % 39  

So 15 14,8 %  

LO 9 8,9 %  

Er 5 5 %  

  Ce,Er,So,LO Ce,Er,LO,So

17 11%

22 14%

24 15,5%

25%

Group B

Future trends:

                                     

• Reliable and affordable technology

• Wide variety of tools for development

• Wide variety of courses available

• More demanding learner

Would you pay £50 for a computer based continuos education module ? (David Polard et al, 1999)

• 1993: 50% •1994: 60%. •1995 37% •1998 5% with the vast majority drawing the line at £20.

• Reliable and affordable technology

• Wide variety of tools for development

• Wide variety of courses available

• More demanding learner

Future trends:

•Methodological framework

• ”Smart” database driven web applications will undertake important part of the interaction