NFPA STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT SITE SECOND DRAFT …€¦ · nfpa standards development site second draft report ... nfpa standards development site second draft report ... 2.3.1 aatcc

NFPA 1975®, Standard on Emergency Services Work Clothing Elements, 2009 Edition

NFPA STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT SITE

SECOND DRAFT REPORTClosing Date: July 19, 2013 NOTE: All Public Comment must be received by 5:00 pm EST/EDST on the published Closing Date.

Welcome colleen kelly!

Quick Print

PCs [1] SR-4 Hide Legislative

Chapter 1 Administration

1.1 Scope.

1.1.1

Global SR-3 Hide Deleted

This standard shall specify requirements for the design, performance, testing, and certification of nonprimary protectivestation/ work apparel uniforms and the individual garments comprising station/ work apparel uniforms .

1.1.2*


Station/work uniform Work apparel garments shall not include socks, dress uniforms, and specific types of undergarments includingbriefs, boxer shorts, boxer briefs, and bras.

1.1.3


This standard shall also specify requirements for the thermal stability of textiles used in the construction of station/ workapparel uniforms .

1.1.4


This standard shall also specify optional requirements for flame resistance, moisture management, odor resistance, waterresistance, and insect repellancy, and visibility markings where such options are specified or claimed to be used in construction ofstation/ work apparel uniforms .

1.1.5

This standard shall not specify requirements for clothing that is intended to provide primary protection from given hazard exposures.

1.1.6


Certification of station/ work apparel uniforms to the requirements of this standard shall not preclude certification to additionalapplicable standards for primary protective clothing where the clothing meets all requirements of each standard.

1.1.7


This standard shall not be construed as addressing all of the safety concerns associated with the use of compliant station/ workapparel uniform garments for their personnel. It shall be the responsibility of the persons and organizations that use compliantstation/ work apparel uniform garments to establish safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatorylimitations prior to use.

1.1.8


This standard shall not be construed as addressing all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with the use of this standard bytesting facilities. It shall be the responsibility of the persons and organizations that use this standard to conduct testing ofstation/ work apparel uniform garments to establish safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatorylimitations prior to using this standard for any designing, manufacturing, and testing.

1.1.9*

This standard shall not specify requirements for any accessories that could be attached to the certified product but are notnecessary for the certified product to meet the requirements of this standard.

1.1.10

Nothing herein shall restrict any jurisdiction or manufacturer from exceeding these minimum requirements.

1.2 Purpose.

1.2.1


The purpose of this standard shall be to provide emergency services personnel with station/ work apparel uniforms that will notcontribute to burn injury severity.

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?contentId=197...

1 of 3 6/4/2014 1:16 PM

ckelly

Text Box

PCs [1]

SR-5 Hide Legislative



1.2.1.1

To achieve this purpose, this standard shall establish minimum requirements for thermally stable textiles that will not rapidlydeteriorate, melt, shrink, or adhere to the wearer's skin, causing greater, more severe burn injuries.

1.2.1.2


This standard shall also provide optional flame resistance requirements and tests to verify the flame resistance of textiles where theauthority having jurisdiction specifies the use of flame resistance textiles for the construction of station/ work apparel uniforms , orwhere the manufacturer represents station/ work apparel uniform textiles as flame resistant.


1.2.1.3

This standard shall also provide optional odor-resistant requirements and tests to verify the odor-resistant properties of textileswhere the authority having jurisdiction specifies the use of odor-resistant textiles for the construction of work apparel, or where themanufacturer represents work apparel textiles as having odor-resistant properties.

1.2.1.4

This standard shall also provide optional liquid resistance requirements and tests to verify the liquid resistance of textiles wherethe authority having jurisdiction specifies the use of liquid resistant textiles for the construction of work apparel, or where themanufacturer represents work apparel textiles as having liquid resistant properties.

1.2.1.5

This standard shall also provide optional insect repellency requirements and tests to verify the insect repellency of textiles wherethe authority having jurisdiction specifies the use of insect repellent textiles for the construction of work apparel, or where themanufacturer represents work apparel textiles as having insect repellent properties.

1.2.2

Controlled laboratory tests used to determine compliance with the performance requirements of this standard shall not be deemedas establishing performance levels for all situations to which emergency services personnel might be exposed.

1.2.3*

This standard shall not be intended to serve as a detailed manufacturing or purchasing specification but shall be permitted to bereferenced in purchase specifications as minimum requirements.

1.3 Application.

1.3.1


This standard shall apply to the designing, manufacturing, testing, and certification of new station/ work apparel uniforms and theindividual garments comprising station/ work apparel uniforms .

1.3.2


This standard shall apply to nonprimary protective garments that comprise station/ work apparel uniforms .

1.3.3

This standard alone shall not apply to clothing that is intended to provide primary protection from given hazard exposures. (SeeA.1.1.5 .)

1.3.4


This edition of NFPA 1975 shall not apply to any station/work work apparel uniforms manufactured to previous editions of thisstandard.

1.3.5


This standard shall not apply to any station/work work uniforms apparel manufactured to the requirements of any otherorganization's standards.

1.3.6*


This standard shall not apply to the use of station/work work uniforms apparel .

1.3.7

This standard shall not apply to any accessories that could be attached to the certified product, before or after purchase, but are notnecessary for the certified product to meet the requirements of this standard. (See A.1.1.9.)


2 of 3 6/4/2014 1:16 PM

1.4 Units.

1.4.1

In this standard, values for measurement are followed by an equivalent in parentheses, but only the first stated value shall beregarded as the requirement.

1.4.2

Equivalent values in parentheses shall not be considered as the requirement as these values might be approximate.


3 of 3 6/4/2014 1:16 PM


NFPA STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT SITESECOND DRAFT REPORTClosing Date: July 19, 2013 NOTE: All Public Comment must be received by 5:00 pm EST/EDST on the published Closing Date.

Quick Print




Chapter 2 Referenced Publications

2.1 General.

The documents or portions thereof listed in this chapter are referenced within this standard and shall be considered part of therequirements of this document.

2.2 NFPA Publications. (Reserved)

2.3 Other Publications.

2.3.1 AATCC Publications.

American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, P.O. Box 12215, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.

AATCC 42, Water Resistance: Impact Penetration Test , 2007.

AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials, Assessment of , 2004.

AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, 2004 2010 .

AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method, 2005 2011 .

AATCC 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties of Textile Fabrics , 2011.

2.3.2 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D737 - Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics , 2008.

ASTM D 751, Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics, 2006.

ASTM D 1683/D 1683M, Standard Test Method for Failure in Sewn Seams of Woven Apparel Fabrics, 2011a.

ASTM D 3940, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength (Load) and Elongation of Sewn Seams of Knit or Woven StretchTextile Fabrics , 1983 (Withdrawn 1995).

ASTM D 6413, Standard Test Method for Flame Resistance of Textiles (Vertical Test), 2011a.

ASTM D 6797, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength of Fabrics Constant Rate of Extension (CRE) Ball Burst Test , 2007(2011).

ASTM E 2149, Standard Test Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of Immobilized Antimicrobial Agents Under DynamicContact Conditions, 2010.

ASTM F 2894, Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing and Equipment for Heat Resistance Using aHot Air Circulating Oven, 2011 2012 .

2.3.3 GSA Publications.

U.S. General Services Administration, 1800 F Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20405.

Single copies of GSA publications generally are available at the General Services Administration Business Centers in citiesthroughout the United States. They also are available from the U.S. Government Printing Office.

Federal Test Method Standard 191A, Textile Test Methods, 1978.

2.3.4 ISO Publications.

International Organization for Standardization, 1, rue de Varembé, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Geneve 20, Switzerland.

ISO 27, Guidelines for corrective action to be taken by a certification body in the event of misuse of its mark of conformity, 1983.

ISO/IEC 65, General requirements for bodies operating product certification systems, 1996.

ISO 9001, Quality management systems — requirements, 2000.

ISO 9073-6, Textiles — Test Methods for Nonwoven — Part 6: Absorption , 2001 2003 .

ISO 17011, General requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies, 2004.

ISO/IEC 17021, Conformity assessment — Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems,2006.

ISO/IEC 17025, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, 2005.


1 of 2 6/4/2014 1:17 PM


2.3.5* Other Publications.

Garment Specification for Trouser, Army Combat Uniform, GL-PD 07-14C, Evaluation of Permethrin Treated Fabric Materials:Extraction and Analysis by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.

US Department of Defense GL/PD 07-13C Purchase Description Coat, Army Combat Uniform, 2011.

Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 11th edition, Merriam-Webster, Inc., Springfield, MA, 2003.

2.4 References for Extracts in Mandatory Sections. (Reserved)


2 of 2 6/4/2014 1:17 PM



Quick PrintChapter 3 Definitions

3.1 General.

The definitions contained in this chapter shall apply to the terms used in this standard. Where terms are not defined in this chapteror within another chapter, they shall be defined using their ordinarily accepted meanings within the context in which they are used.Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 11th edition, shall be the source for the ordinarily accepted meaning.

3.2 NFPA Official Definitions.

3.2.1* Approved.

Acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction.

3.2.2* Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ).

An organization, office, or individual responsible for enforcing the requirements of a code or standard, or for approving equipment,materials, an installation, or a procedure.

3.2.3 Labeled.

Equipment or materials to which has been attached a label, symbol, or other identifying mark of an organization that is acceptableto the authority having jurisdiction and concerned with product evaluation, that maintains periodic inspection of production of labeledequipment or materials, and by whose labeling the manufacturer indicates compliance with appropriate standards or performance ina specified manner.

3.2.4* Listed.

Equipment, materials, or services included in a list published by an organization that is acceptable to the authority havingjurisdiction and concerned with evaluation of products or services, that maintains periodic inspection of production of listedequipment or materials or periodic evaluation of services, and whose listing states that either the equipment, material, or servicemeets appropriate designated standards or has been tested and found suitable for a specified purpose.

3.2.5 Shall.

Indicates a mandatory requirement.

3.2.6 Should.

Indicates a recommendation or that which is advised but not required.

3.2.7 Standard.

A document, the main text of which contains only mandatory provisions using the word “shall” to indicate requirements and which isin a form generally suitable for mandatory reference by another standard or code or for adoption into law. Nonmandatory provisionsshall be located in an appendix or annex, footnote, or fine-print note and are not to be considered a part of the requirements of astandard Nonmandatory provisions are not to be considered a part of the requirements of a standard and shall be located in anappendix, annex, footnote, informational note, or other means as permitted in the Manual of Style for NFPA Technical CommitteeDocuments .

3.3 General Definitions.

For the purposes of this standard, the terms defined in this section shall have the meanings stated unless modified by themandatory requirements of this standard. Where terms are not defined herein, those terms shall have the ordinarily acceptedmeanings, or the meaning that the text implies. Terms used in the present tense shall include the past and future tense. Terms usedin the masculine gender shall include female and neuter genders, terms used in the singular shall include the plural, and terms usedin the plural shall include the singular.

3.3.1 Accessories.

An item or items that could be attached to a certified product but are not necessary for the certified product to meet therequirements of the standard.

3.3.2 Certification/Certified.

A system whereby a certification organization determines that a manufacturer has demonstrated the ability to produce a productthat complies with the requirements of this standard, authorizes the manufacturer to use a label on listed products that comply withthe requirements of this standard, and establishes a follow-up program conducted by the certification organization as a check on themethods the manufacturer uses to determine compliance with the requirements of this standard.

3.3.3 Certification Mark or Label.

The authorized identification symbol or logo of the certification organization.

3.3.4 Certification Organization.

An independent, third-party organization that determines product compliance with the requirements of this standard with alabeling/listing/follow-up program.

3.3.5 Compliant.

Meeting or exceeding all applicable requirements of this standard.

3.3.6 Drip.

To run or fall in drops or blobs.


1 of 3 6/4/2014 1:17 PM

SCR-1 Hide Legislative



3.3.7* Emblems.

Shields, heraldry, lettering, or printing that designates a product, a governmental entity, or a specific organization, rank, title,position, or other professional status that is painted, screened, embroidered, sewn, glued, bonded, or otherwise attached to aproduct in a permanent manner.

3.3.8 Findings.

All materials used in the construction of items, excluding textiles and interlinings.

3.3.9* Flame Resistance.

The property of a material whereby combustion is prevented, terminated, or inhibited following application of a flaming ornon-flaming source of ignition, with or without subsequent removal of the ignition source.

3.3.10 Follow-up Program.

The sampling, inspections, tests, or other measures conducted by the certification organization on a periodic basis to determine thecontinued compliance of labeled and listed products that are being produced by the manufacturer to the requirements of thisstandard.

3.3.11 Garment.

See 3.3.28, Station/ Work Uniform Apparel Garment.

3.3.12 Inherent Flame Resistance.

Flame resistance that is derived from the essential characteristics of the fiber or polymer.

3.3.13 Insect Repellancy.

A finish applied to textiles to provide a deterrent against bites from mosquitoes, midges, ants, ticks, and chiggers.

3.3.14 Interlining.

Any textile that is incorporated into any garment as a layer between outer and inner layers.

3.3.15 Major Seams.

Classes of seams that designate minimum sewn seam requirements.

3.3.16 Manufacturer.

The entity that directs or controls any of the following: compliant product design, compliant product manufacturing, or compliantproduct quality assurance; or the entity that assumes the liability for the compliant product or provides the warranty for the compliantproduct.

3.3.17 Melt.

A response to heat by a material resulting in evidence of flowing or dripping.

3.3.18 Moisture Management Fabric.

A fabric that has the properties of wickability, air permeability or breathability, and moisture vapor transfer properties as certifiedby the performance requirements of this standard.

3.3.18 Nonprimary Protective Garment.

A garment or clothing that is not designed nor intended to be the barrier of protection from a specific hazard exposure.

3.3.19 Odor Control -Resistant .

A finish or an inherent property that guards against minimizes the growth of odors from microbial causes.

3.3.20 Patches.

See 3.3.7, Emblems.

3.3.21 Primary Protective Garment.

A garment that is designed, certified, and intended to be the barrier of protection from a specific hostile environment.

3.3.22* Product Label.

A marking provided by the manufacturer for each compliant product containing compliant statements, certification statements,manufacturer and model information, or similar data.

3.3.23 Separate.

A material response evidenced by splitting or delaminating.


3.3.24 Work Apparel Garment.

Textile apparel that cover the torso and limbs or parts of limbs, excluding heads, hands, and feet.


3.3.25 Work Apparel.

Nonprimary protective garments certified as compliant with this standard that are intended to be worn by emergency servicespersonnel while on duty.


2 of 3 6/4/2014 1:17 PM


3.3.24 Textile Fabric.

A planar structure material consisting of yarns or fibers.

3.3.25* Visibility Markings.

Retroreflective and fluorescent conspicuity enhancements.

3.3.26 Water Resistance.

A finish or an inherent property that repels water and other fluids limits the absorption of water .


3.3.27 Work Apparel.

Nonprimary protective garments certified as compliant with this standard that are intended to be worn by emergency servicespersonnel while on duty.


3.3.28 Work Apparel Garment.

Textile apparel that cover the torso and limbs or parts of limbs, excluding heads, hands, and feet.


3 of 3 6/4/2014 1:17 PM



Quick Print



Chapter 4 Certification

4.1 General.

4.1.1


The process of certification for station/work work uniforms apparel as being compliant with NFPA 1975 shall meet the requirementsof Section 4.1 , General; Section 4.2 , Certification Program; Section 4.3 , Inspection and Testing; Section 4.4 , Recertification;Section 4.5 , Manufacturers’ Quality Assurance Program; Section 4.6 , Hazards Involving Compliant Product; Section 4.7 ,Manufacturers' Investigation of Complaints and Returns; and Section 4.8 , Manufacturers' Safety Alert and Product RecallSystems.

4.1.2


All compliant station/work work uniform apparel garments that are labeled as being compliant with this standard shall meet orexceed all applicable requirements specified in this standard and shall be certified.

4.1.3

Where station/work work uniform apparel garments are manufactured with flame resistant textiles, the entire garment shall becertified as compliant with the requirements of Section 7.2 7.2 , Optional Requirements for Flame Resistant Station/WorkUniforms, in addition to all other requirements of this standard.

4.1.3.2

Where work apparel is manufactured with liquid-resistant textiles, the entire garment shall be certified as compliant with therequirements of Section 7.1.4 , in addition to all other requirements of this standard.

4.1.3.3

Where work apparel is manufactured with insect repellent, the entire garment shall be certified as compliant with the requirementsof Section 7.2 , in addition to all other requirements of this standard.

4.1.3


Where station/work work uniform apparel garments are manufactured with flame resistant textiles, the entire garment shall becertified as compliant with the requirements of Section 7.2 7.2 , Optional Requirements for Flame Resistant Station/WorkUniforms, in addition to all other requirements of this standard.

4.1.3.1


Where work apparel is manufactured with odor-resistant textiles, the entire garment shall be certified as compliant with therequirements of Section 7.3 , in addition to all other requirements of this standard.

4.1.3.2

Where work apparel is manufactured with water-resistant textiles, the entire garment shall be certified as compliant with therequirements of Section 7.4 , in addition to all other requirements of this standard.

4.1.3.3

Where work apparel is manufactured with insect repellent, the entire garment shall be certified as compliant with the requirementsof Section 7.5 , in addition to all other requirements of this standard.

4.1.4

All certification shall be performed by a certification organization that meets at least the requirements specified in Section 4.2,Certification Program, and that is accredited for personal protective equipment in accordance with ISO 65, General requirements forbodies operating product certification systems. The accreditation shall be issued by an accreditation organization operating inaccordance with ISO 17011, General requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies.

4.1.5

Manufacturers shall not claim compliance with a portion(s) or segment(s) of the requirements of this standard and shall not use theNFPA or the name or identification of this standard, NFPA 1975, in any statements about their respective products unless theproducts are certified as compliant with this standard.

4.1.6


All compliant station/work work uniform apparel garments shall be labeled and listed.


1 of 7 6/4/2014 1:20 PM





4.1.7


All compliant station/work work uniform apparel garments shall have a product label that meets the requirements specified inSection 5.1 , Product Labeling Requirements.

4.1.7.1


Where station/work work uniform apparel garments are certified as compliant with only the mandatory, nonoptional requirements ofthis standard, the product label shall bear the text specified in 5.1.5 .

4.1.7.2


Where station/work work uniform apparel garments are is certified as compliant with the optional requirements specified inSection s 7.2 through 7.5 , Optional Requirements for Flame Resistant Station/Work Uniforms, in addition to all other requirementsof this standard, the product label shall bear the text specified in 5.1.6 .

4.1.8*

The certification organization's label, symbol, or identifying mark shall be part of the product label, shall be attached to the productlabel, or shall be immediately adjacent to the product label.

4.1.9

The certification organization shall not issue any new certifications to the 2004 2009 edition of NFPA 1975Standard onStation/Work Uniforms for Fire and Emergency Services on or after the NFPA effective date for the 2014 edition of NFPA1975,Standard on Station/Work Uniforms Apparel for Emergency Services 2009 2014 edition which is 29 December2008 November 12, 2013 .

4.1.10

The certification organization shall not permit any manufacturer to continue to label any products that are certified as compliant withthe 2004 2009 edition of NFPA 1975, Standard on Station/Work Uniforms for Fire and Emergency Services on or after 30 June2009 November 12, 2013, plus 12 months .

4.1.11

The certification organization shall require manufacturers to remove all certification labels and product labels indicating compliancewith the 2004 2009 edition of NFPA 1975, Standard on Station/Work Uniforms for Fire and Emergency Services from all productsthat are under the control of the manufacturer on 30 June 2009 November 12, 2013, plus 12 months , and the certificationorganization shall verify that this action is taken.

4.2 Certification Program.

4.2.1*

The certification organization shall not be owned or controlled by manufacturers or vendors of the product being certified.

4.2.2

The certification organization shall be primarily engaged in certification work and shall not have a monetary interest in the product’sultimate profitability.

4.2.3

The certification organization shall be accredited for personal protective equipment in accordance with ISO 65, Generalrequirements for bodies operating product certification systems. The accreditation shall be issued by an accreditation bodyoperating in accordance with ISO 17011, General requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies.

4.2.4

The certification organization shall refuse to certify products to this standard that do not comply with all applicable requirements ofthis standard.

4.2.5*

The contractual provisions between the certification organization and the manufacturer shall specify that certification is contingenton compliance with all applicable requirements of this standard.

4.2.5.1

The certification organization shall not offer or confer any conditional, temporary, or partial certifications.

4.2.5.2

Manufacturers shall not be authorized to use any label or reference to the certification organization on products that are notcompliant with all applicable requirements of this standard.

4.2.6*

The certification organization shall have laboratory facilities and equipment available for conducting proper tests to determineproduct compliance.


2 of 7 6/4/2014 1:20 PM

4.2.6.1

The certification organization laboratory facilities shall have a program in place and functioning for calibration of all instruments, andprocedures shall be in use to ensure proper control of all testing.

4.2.6.2

The certification organization laboratory facilities shall follow good practice regarding the use of laboratory manuals, form datasheets, documented calibration and calibration routines, performance verification, proficiency testing, and staff qualification andtraining programs.

4.2.7

The certification organization shall require the manufacturer to establish and maintain a quality assurance program that meets therequirements of Section 4.5, Manufacturers' Quality Assurance Program.

4.2.7.1*

The certification organization shall require the manufacturer to have a product recall system specified in Section 4.8,Manufacturers’ Safety Alert and Product Recall Systems, as part of the manufacturer’s quality assurance program.

4.2.7.2

The certification organization shall audit the manufacturer’s quality assurance program to ensure that the quality assurance programprovides continued product compliance with this standard.

4.2.8

The certification organization and the manufacturer shall evaluate any changes affecting the form, fit, or function of the compliantproduct to determine its continued certification to this standard.

4.2.9*

The certification organization shall have a follow-up inspection program of the manufacturer’s facilities of the compliant product withat least two random and unannounced visits per 12-month period.

4.2.9.1

As part of the follow-up inspection program, the certification organization shall select sample compliant product at random from themanufacturer’s production line, from the manufacturer’s in-house stock, or from the open market.

4.2.9.2

Sample product shall be evaluated by the certification organization to verify the product’s continued compliance in order to assurethat the materials, components, and manufacturing quality assurance systems are consistent with the materials, components, andmanufacturing quality assurance that were inspected and tested by the certification organization during certification andrecertification.

4.2.9.3

The certification organization shall be permitted to conduct specific testing to verify the product’s continued compliance.

4.2.9.4

For products, components, and materials where prior testing, judgment, and experience of the certification organization have shownthe result to be in jeopardy of not complying with this standard, the certification organization shall conduct more frequent testing ofthe sample product, components, and materials acquired in accordance with 4.2.9.1 against the applicable requirements of thisstandard.

4.2.10

The certification organization shall have in place a series of procedures, as specified in Section 4.6, Hazards Involving CompliantProduct, that address report(s) of situation(s) in which a compliant product is subsequently found to be hazardous.

4.2.11

The certification organization’s operating procedures shall provide a mechanism for the manufacturer to appeal decisions. Theprocedures shall include the presentation of information from both sides of a controversy to a designated appeals panel.

4.2.12

The certification organization shall be in a position to use legal means to protect the integrity of its name and label. The name andlabel shall be registered and legally defended.

4.3 Inspection and Testing.

4.3.1


For initial certification and recertification of station/work work uniforms apparel , the certification organization shall conduct bothinspection and testing as specified in this section.

4.3.2

All inspections, evaluations, conditioning, and testing for certification or for recertification shall be conducted by a certificationorganization’s testing laboratory that is accredited in accordance with the requirements of ISO 17025, General requirements for thecompetence of calibration and testing laboratories.

4.3.2.1

The certification organization’s testing laboratory’s scope of accreditation to ISO 17025, General requirements for the competenceof testing and calibration laboratories, shall encompass testing of personal protective equipment.

4.3.2.2

The accreditation of a certification organization’s testing laboratory shall be issued by an accreditation body operating in accordancewith ISO 17011, General requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies.

4.3.3


3 of 7 6/4/2014 1:20 PM

A certification organization shall be permitted to utilize conditioning and testing results conducted by a product or componentmanufacturer for certification or recertification provided the manufacturer’s testing laboratory meets the requirements specified in4.3.3.1 through 4.3.3.5.

4.3.3.1

The manufacturer’s testing laboratory shall be accredited in accordance with the requirements of ISO 17025, General requirementsfor the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

4.3.3.2

The manufacturer’s testing laboratory’s scope of accreditation to ISO 17025, General requirements for the competence of testingand calibration laboratories, shall encompass testing of personal protective equipment.

4.3.3.3

The accreditation of a manufacturer’s testing laboratory shall be issued by an accreditation body operating in accordance with ISO17011, General requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies.

4.3.3.4

The certification organization shall approve the manufacturer’s testing laboratory.

4.3.3.5

The certification organization shall determine the level of supervision and witnessing of the conditioning and testing for certificationor recertification conducted at the manufacturer’s testing laboratory.

4.3.4

Sampling levels for testing and inspection shall be established by the certification organization and the manufacturer to ensure areasonable and acceptable reliability at a reasonable and acceptable confidence level that products certified to this standard arecompliant, unless such sampling levels are specified herein.

4.3.5


Inspection by the certification organization shall include a review of all product labels to ensure that all required label attachment,compliance statements, certification statements, and other product information are at least as specified for the respectivestation/work work uniform apparel garment in Section 5.1 , Product Labeling Requirements.

4.3.6

Inspection by the certification organization shall include an evaluation of any symbols and pictorial graphic representations used onproduct labels or in user information, as permitted by 5.1.8 and 5.2.5, to ensure that the symbols are clearly explained in theproduct's user information package.

4.3.7

Inspection by the certification organization shall include a review of the user information required by Section 5.2, User Information,to ensure that the information has been developed and is available.

4.3.8

Inspection by the certification organization for determining compliance with the design requirements specified in Chapter 6 shall beperformed on whole or complete products.

4.3.9

Testing to determine product compliance with the performance requirements specified in Chapter 7 shall be conducted by thecertification organization in accordance with the specified testing requirements of Chapter 8.

4.3.9.1

Testing shall be performed on specimens representative of materials and components used in the actual construction of theprotective ensemble and ensemble element.

4.3.9.2

The certification organization also shall be permitted to use sample materials cut from a representative product.

4.3.10

The certification organization shall accept from the manufacturer, for evaluation and testing for certification, only product or productcomponents that are the same in every respect as the actual final product or product component.

4.3.11

The certification organization shall not allow any modifications, pretreatment, conditioning, or other such special processes of theproduct or any product component prior to the product’s submission for evaluation and testing by the certification organization.

4.3.12

The certification organization shall not allow the substitution, repair, or modification, other than as specifically permitted herein, ofany product or any product component during testing.

4.3.13

The certification organization shall not allow test specimens that have been conditioned and tested for one method to bereconditioned and tested for another test method unless specifically permitted in the test method.

4.3.14

The certification organization shall test ensemble elements with the specific ensemble(s) with which they are to be certified.

4.3.15

Any change in the design, construction, or material of a compliant product shall necessitate new inspection and testing to verifycompliance to all applicable requirements of this standard that the certification organization determines can be affected by suchchange. This recertification shall be conducted before labeling the modified product as being compliant with this standard.


4 of 7 6/4/2014 1:20 PM

4.3.16

The manufacturer shall maintain all design and performance inspection and test data from the certification organization used in thecertification of the manufacturer’s compliant product. The manufacturer shall provide such data, upon request, to the purchaser orauthority having jurisdiction.

4.4 Recertification.

4.4.1


All station/work work uniform apparel clothing item products that are labeled as being compliant with this standard shall undergorecertification on an annual basis. This recertification shall include the following:

(1) Inspection and evaluation to all design requirements as required by this standard on all manufacturer models and components

(2) Testing to all performance requirements as required by this standard on all manufacturer models and components with thefollowing protocol:

(a) Where a test method incorporates testing both before and after laundering preconditioning specified in 8.1.3 and 8.1.4and the test generates quantitative results, recertification testing shall be limited to the conditioning that yielded theworst-case test result during the initial certification for the model or component.

(b) Where a test method incorporates testing both before and after laundering preconditioning specified in 8.1.3 and 8.1.4and the test generates non-quantitative results such as pass/fail for melt/drip, recertification shall be limited to a singleconditioning procedure in any given year. Subsequent annual recertifications shall cycle through the remainingconditioning procedures to ensure that all required conditionings are included over time.

(c) Where a test method requires the testing of three specimens, a minimum of one specimen shall be tested for annualrecertification.

(d) Where a test method requires the testing of five or more specimens, a minimum of two specimens shall be tested forannual recertification.

4.4.2


Any change that affects the station/work work uniform apparel clothing item’s performance under the design or performancerequirements of this standard shall constitute a different model.

4.4.3


For the purpose of this standard, models shall include each unique pattern, style, or design of the individualstation/work work uniform apparel clothing item.

4.4.4

Samples of manufacturer models and components for recertification shall be acquired as part of the follow-up program inaccordance with 4.2.9 and shall be permitted to be used toward annual recertification.

4.4.5

The manufacturer shall maintain all design and performance inspection and test data from the certification organization used in therecertification of manufacturer models and components.

4.4.5.1

The manufacturer shall provide such data, upon request, to the purchaser or authority having jurisdiction.

4.5 Manufacturers’ Quality Assurance Program.

4.5.1

The manufacturer shall provide and operate a quality assurance program that meets the requirements of this section and thatincludes a product recall system as specified in 4.2.7.1 and Section 4.8, Manufacturers’ Safety Alert and Product Recall Systems.

4.5.2

The operation of the quality assurance program shall evaluate and test compliant product production to the requirements of thisstandard to assure production remains in compliance.

4.5.3

The manufacturer shall be registered to ISO 9001, Quality management systems — Requirements.

4.5.3.1

Registration to the requirements of ISO 9001, Quality management systems — Requirements, shall be conducted by a registrar thatis accredited for personal protective equipment.

4.5.3.2

Registrars specified in 4.5.3.1 shall be accredited for personal protective equipment in accordance with the 2006 edition of ISO/IEC17021, Conformity assessment — Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems.

4.5.4*

Any entity that meets the definition of manufacturer specified in 3.3.16 and therefore is considered to be the “manufacturer” butdoes not manufacture or assemble the compliant product shall meet the requirements specified in this section.

4.5.5*

Where the manufacturer uses subcontractors in the construction or assembly of the compliant product, the locations and names ofall subcontractor facilities shall be documented, and the documentation shall be provided to the manufacturer’s ISO registrar andthe certification organization.


5 of 7 6/4/2014 1:20 PM

4.6 Hazards Involving Compliant Product.

4.6.1*

The certification organization shall establish procedures to be followed where situation(s) are reported in which a compliant productis subsequently found to be hazardous. These procedures shall comply with the provisions of ISO Guide 27, Guidelines forcorrective action to be taken by a certification body in the event of misuse of its mark of conformity, and as modified herein.

4.6.2*

Where a report of a hazard involved with a compliant product is received by the certification organization, the validity of the reportshall be investigated.

4.6.3

With respect to a compliant product, a hazard shall be a condition or create a situation that results in exposing life, limb, or propertyto an imminently dangerous or dangerous condition.

4.6.4

Where a specific hazard is identified, the determination of the appropriate action for the certification organization and themanufacturer to undertake shall take into consideration the severity of the hazard and its consequences to the safety and health ofusers.

4.6.5

Where it is established that a hazard is involved with a compliant product, the certification organization shall determine the scope ofthe hazard, including products, model numbers, serial numbers, factory production facilities, production runs, and quantitiesinvolved.

4.6.6

The certification organization’s investigation shall include, but not be limited to, the extent and scope of the problem as it mightapply to other compliant products or compliant product components manufactured by other manufacturers or certified by othercertification organizations.

4.6.7

The certification organization shall also investigate reports of a hazard where a compliant product is gaining widespread use inapplications not foreseen when the standard was written, such applications in turn being ones for which the product was notcertified, and no specific scope of application has been provided in the standard, and no limiting scope of application was providedby the manufacturer in written material accompanying the compliant product at the point of sale.

4.6.8

The certification organization shall require the manufacturer of the compliant product, or the manufacturer of the compliant productcomponent if applicable, to assist the certification organization in the investigation and to conduct its own investigation as specifiedin Section 4.7, Manufacturers’ Investigation of Complaints and Returns.

4.6.9

Where the facts indicating a need for corrective action are conclusive and the certification organization’s appeal proceduresreferenced in 4.2.11 have been followed, the certification organization shall initiate corrective action immediately, provided there is amanufacturer to be held responsible for such action.

4.6.10

Where the facts are conclusive and corrective action is indicated, but there is no manufacturer to be held responsible, such as whenthe manufacturer is out of business or the manufacturer is bankrupt, the certification organization shall immediately notify relevantgovernmental and regulatory agencies and issue a notice to the user community about the hazard.

4.6.11*

Where the facts are conclusive and corrective action is indicated, the certification organization shall take one or more of thefollowing corrective actions:

(1) Notification of parties authorized and responsible for issuing a safety alert when, in the opinion of the certification organization,such a notification is necessary to inform the users

(2) Notification of parties authorized and responsible for issuing a product recall when, in the opinion of the certificationorganization, such a recall is necessary to protect the users

(3) Removal of the mark of certification from the product

(4) Where a hazardous condition exists and it is not practical to implement 4.6.11(1), 4.6.11(2), or 4.6.11(3), or the responsibleparties refuse to take corrective action, the certification organization shall notify relevant governmental and regulatory agenciesand issue a notice to the user community about the hazard

4.6.12

The certification organization shall provide a report to the organization or individual identifying the reported hazardous condition andnotify them of the corrective action indicated or that no corrective action is indicated.

4.7 Manufacturers’ Investigation of Complaints and Returns.

4.7.1

Manufacturers shall provide corrective action in accordance with ISO 9001, Quality management systems — Requirements, forinvestigating written complaints and returned products.

4.7.2

Manufacturers’ records of returns and complaints related to safety issues shall be retained for at least 5 years.


6 of 7 6/4/2014 1:20 PM

4.7.3

Where the manufacturer discovers, during the review of specific returns or complaints, that a compliant product or compliantproduct component can constitute a potential safety risk to end users that is possibly subject to a safety alert or product recall, themanufacturer shall immediately contact the certification organization and provide all information about its review to assist thecertification organization with its investigation.

4.8 Manufacturers’ Safety Alert and Product Recall Systems.

4.8.1

Manufacturers shall establish a written safety alert system and a written product recall system that describes the procedures to beused in the event that it decides, or is directed by the certification organization, either to issue a safety alert or to conduct a productrecall.

4.8.2

The manufacturers’ safety alert and product recall system shall provide the following:

(1) The establishment of a coordinator and responsibilities by the manufacturer for the handling of safety alerts and product recalls

(2) A method of notifying all dealers, distributors, purchasers, users, and the NFPA about the safety alert or product recall that canbe initiated within a one week period following the manufacturer’s decision to issue a safety alert or to conduct a product recall,or after the manufacturer has been directed by the certification organization to issue a safety alert or conduct a product recall

(3) Techniques for communicating accurately and understandably the nature of the safety alert or product recall and in particularthe specific hazard or safety issue found to exist

(4) Procedures for removing a product that is recalled and for documenting the effectiveness of the product recall

(5) A plan for either repairing, replacing, or compensating purchasers for returned product


7 of 7 6/4/2014 1:20 PM



Quick Print




Chapter 5 Labeling and Information

5.1 Product Labeling Requirements.

5.1.1

Each station/work uniform garment shall have the minimum following compliance statement. (See A.4.1.8 .)

"THIS GARMENT MEETS NFPA 1975 (2013 ED)."

Work apparel shall have a product label or labels permanently and conspicuously attached to it. (See A.4.1.8 .)

5.1.1.1

The required label shall be permitted to be printed directly on the compliant product.

5.1.2

Multiple label pieces shall be permitted if necessary to carry all statements and information required to be on the product label.

5.1.3

The certification organization's label, symbol, or identifying mark shall be permanently attached to the product label or shall be partof the product label.

5.1.4

All worded portions of the required product label shall be printed at least in English.

5.1.5

Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with only the mandatory requirements of this standard, and is notcertified with the optional flame resistance requirements , the following statement shall be printed legibly on the product label. Allletters shall be at least 2.5 mm (

3 ⁄32

in.) high.

“THIS GARMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975 , STANDARD ON STATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOREMERGENCY SERVICES, 2013 EDITION.

THIS GARMENT IS NOT FLAME RESISTANT!DO NOT REMOVE THIS LABEL!”

Where work apparel is certified as compliant with only the mandatory base requirements of this standard, the following statementshall be printed legibly on the product label. All letters shall be at least 2.5 mm ( 3 ⁄32 in.) high.

THIS GARMENT MEETS THE BASE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975-2014 EDITION. DO NOT REMOVE THIS LABEL.

5.1.6


1 of 5 6/4/2014 1:20 PM

Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with the mandatory requirements of this standard, and alsocertified as compliant with one or more of the optional requirements of this standard, the following statement shall be printed legiblyon the product label. All letters shall be at least 2.5 mm ( 3 ⁄32 in.) high.

“THIS GARMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975 , STANDARD ON STATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOREMERGENCY SERVICES, 2013 EDITION.

DO NOT REMOVE THIS LABEL!”

Where work apparel is certified as compliant with the mandatory base requirements of this standard, and also certified ascompliant with one or more of the optional requirements of this standard, the statement in 5.1.5 shall be printed legibly on theproduct label. The label shall also indicate the applicable optional requirement(s) by either the symbol or statement as identified inTable 5.1.6. Where the symbol is used to identify compliance with the optional requirement(s), the statement shall be included inthe user information to explain that symbol. All letters shall be at least 2.5 mm ( 3 ⁄32 in.) high.

Table 5.1.6 Label Symbols for Work Apparel

Optional Requirement Compliance Statement Symbol

7.2 Optional Requirements for FlameResistant Work Apparel

"THIS GARMENT MEETS THEOPTIONAL FLAME RESISTANCEREQUIREMENTS OF NFPA1975-2014."

7.3 Optional Requirements forOdor-Resistant Work Apparel

"THIS GARMENT MEETS THEOPTIONAL ODOR-RESISTANTREQUIREMENTS OF NFPA1975-2014."

7.4 Optional Requirements for WaterResistant Work Apparel

"THIS GARMENT MEETS THEOPTIONAL WATER RESISTANCEREQUIREMENTS OF NFPA1975-2014."

7.5 Optional Requirements for InsectRepellent Work Apparel

"THIS GARMENT MEETS THEOPTIONAL INSECT REPELLENTREQUIREMENTS OF NFPA1975-2014."

5.1.6.1

Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with the mandatory requirements of this standard and alsocertified as compliant with the optional moisture management requirements specified in Section 7.9 , Optional Requirements forMoisture Management Station/Work Uniforms, the following statement shall be printed on the product label. All letters must be atleast 2.5 mm ( 3 ⁄32 in) high.

“THIS GARMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975, STANDARD ON STATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOREMERGENCY SERVICES, 2013 EDITION, AND THE OPTIONAL MOISTURE MANAGEMENT TEXTILE REQUIREMENTS OFNFPA 1975. DO NOT REMOVE THIS LABEL!”

5.1.6.2

Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with the mandatory requirements of this standard and alsocertified as compliant with the optional odor control requirements specified in Section 7.8 , Optional Requirements for OdorControl Station/Work Uniforms, the following statement shall be printed on the product label. All letters must be at least 2.5 mm( 3 ⁄32 in) high

“THIS GARMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975, STANDARD ON STATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOREMERGENCY SERVICES, 2013 EDITION, AND THE OPTIONAL ODOR CONTROL TEXTILE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA

1975. DO NOT REMOVE THIS LABEL!”


2 of 5 6/4/2014 1:20 PM

5.1.6.3

Where the station/work uniform apparel garment is certified as compliant with the mandatory requirements of this standard andalso certified as compliant with the water penetration resistance requirements specified in Section 7.11 , Optional Requirementsfor Liquid Resistant Station/Work Uniforms, the following statement shall be printed on the product label. All letters must be atleast 2.5 mm ( 3 ⁄32 in) high.

“THIS GARMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975, STANDARD ON STATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOREMERGENCY SERVICES, 2013 EDITION, AND THE OPTIONAL WATER RESISTANT TEXTILE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA


5.1.6.4

Where the station/work uniform apparel garment is certified as compliant with the mandatory requirements of this standard andalso certified as compliant with the optional insect repellent requirements specified in Section 7.12 , Optional Requirements forInsect Repellency Station/Work Uniforms, the following statement shall be printed on the product label. All letters must be at least2.5 mm ( 3 ⁄32 in) high.

“THIS GARMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975, STANDARD ON STATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOREMERGENCY SERVICES, 2013 EDITION, AND THE OPTIONAL INSECT REPELLENT TEXTILE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA



3 of 5 6/4/2014 1:20 PM

5.1.6.5

Where the station/work uniform apparel is certified as compliant with one or more of the following optional requirements of thisstandard, a symbol may be printed or applied in close proximity to the compliance statement in 5.1.6 to identify the garment ascompliant with the respective optional requirement(s). All letters shall be at least 2 mm ( 1 ⁄16 in.) high.

Table 5.1.6(b) Label Symbols for Station/Work Uniforms

Symbol to be Printed on Label Optional Requirement

7.5 Optional Requirements for Flame Resistant Station/Work Uniforms

7.9 Optional Requirements for Moisture Management Station/Work Uniforms

7.10 Optional Requirements for Odor Control Station/Work Uniforms

7.11 Optional Requirements for Liquid Resistant Station/Work Uniforms

7.12 Optional Requirements for Insect Repellency Station/Work Uniforms


4 of 5 6/4/2014 1:20 PM


5.1.7

The following information shall also be printed legibly on the product label. All letters shall be at least 2 mm (1⁄16 in.) high:

(1) Manufacturer's name

(2) Manufacturer's garment identification number, lot number, or serial number

(3) Country of manufacture

(4) Model name, number, or design

(5) Date of manufacture

(6) Size

(7) Cleaning and drying instructions, including applicable warnings regarding detergents, soaps, cleaning additives, and bleaches

(8) Fiber content and composition

5.1.8

Symbols and other pictorial graphic representations shall be permitted to be used in place of worded statements on the productlabels where explanations for symbols and pictorial graphic representations are explained in the user information.

5.2 User Information.

5.2.1


The product label for the portions of the product label information not specified in 5.1.1 through 5.1.4 shall be permitted to be ahang tag affixed to each station/work uniform or shall be permitted to be printed on a sheet that is inserted and sealed in thepackaging that immediately contains the station/work uniform .

5.2.1


The manufacturer shall provide user information including, but not limited to, warnings, information, and instructions with eachstation/work work uniform apparel garment.

5.2.2


The manufacturer shall attach the required user information, or packaging containing the user information, to thestation/work work uniform apparel garment in such a manner that it is not possible to use the garment without being aware of theavailability of the information.

5.2.3


The required user information, or packaging containing the user information, shall be attached to thestation/work work uniform apparel garment so that a deliberate action is necessary to remove it.

5.2.4

The manufacturer shall provide notice that the user information is to be removed only by the end user.

5.2.5

Symbols and other pictorial graphic representations shall be permitted to be used to supplement worded statements or in place ofworded statements in the user information where explanations for symbols and pictorial graphic representations are explained in theuser information.

5.2.6


The manufacturer shall provide at least the following instructions and information with each station/work work uniform apparelgarment:

(1) Pre-use information as follows:

(a) Manufacturer's name and address

(b) Safety considerations

(c) Garment marking recommendations and restrictions

(d) A statement that most performance properties of the garment cannot be tested by the user in the field

(e) Warranty information

(2) Inspection frequency and details

(3)

(4) Retirement and disposal criteria and consideration

* Maintenance information as follows:

(a) Cleaning instructions

(b) Methods of repair where applicable

(c) Decontamination procedures for both chemical and biological contamination


5 of 5 6/4/2014 1:20 PM



Quick Print

PCs [1] CCs [1] SCR-7 Hide Legislative



Chapter 6 Design Requirements

6.1 General.

6.1.1


Station/work uniforms Work apparel shall have at least the applicable design requirements specified in this section when inspectedby the certification organization as specified in Section 4.3 , Inspection and Testing.

6.1.2


All station/work work uniform apparel hardware shall be examined and shall be free of rough spots, burrs, or sharp edges.

6.1.3


Any metal findings of station/work work uniforms apparel shall not come into direct contact with the wearer's body.

Global SCR-7 Hide Deleted

6.1.4

Where work apparel garments are constructed from flame-resistant textiles, the garments shall be stitched with thread of aninherently flame-resistant fiber.

6.1.4

Where station/work uniforms are constructed from flame resistant textiles, station/work uniforms shall meet all requirementsspecified in Section 7.5 , Optional Requirements for Flame Resistant Station/Work Uniforms, to be certified as complying withthe optional flame resistance requirements.

6.1.5

Global SCR-7 Hide Deleted

Where station/work uniforms are constructed from flame resistant textiles, the garments shall be stitched with thread of aninherently flame-resistant fiber.

6.1.6

Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with the optional moisture management properties, the garment shall meet therequirements of Section 7.9 Optional Requirements for Moisture Management Station/Work Uniforms.

6.1.7

Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with the optional odor control properties, the garment shall meet the requirementsof Section 7.8 Optional Requirements for Odor Resistant Station/Work Uniforms..

6.1.8

Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with the optional water resistance properties, the garment shall meet therequirements of Section 7.11.1 Optional Requirements for Liquid Resistant Station/Work Uniforms.

6.1.9

Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with the optional insect repellency, the garment shall meet the requirements ofSection 7.12 Optional Requirements for Insect Repellancy Station/Work Uniforms.

6.2 Configuration.

6.2.1

Station/work uniform garments Work apparel designed for the upper torso shall be permitted to be configured as follows:

(1) Shirt, with collar, full-length front opening, either long sleeve or short sleeve

(2) Polo or golf-style shirt, with collar, pullover with partial front opening, either long sleeve or short sleeve

(3) Tee shirt, pullover without front opening, without collar, either long sleeve or short sleeve (See A.1.1.2.)

(4) Sweatshirt, pullover, with or without collar, either long sleeve or short sleeve

(5) Jacket, with or without collar, with full front opening and long sleeves


1 of 2 6/4/2014 1:21 PM

6.2.2


Station/work uniform Work apparel garments designed for the lower torso shall be permitted to be configured as follows:

(1) Pants, extending from the waist to the ankles

(2) Shorts, extending from the waist to a point at or above the knee


2 of 2 6/4/2014 1:21 PM



Quick Print


PCs [1]

PCs [1]

Chapter 7 Performance Requirements

7.1 Base Requirements for Work Apparel.

7.1.1 Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance.

7.1.1.1

Textile fabrics, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2 , and shall notmelt, drip, separate, or ignite, and shall not shrink more than 10 percent in any direction. Where the optional stretching frame isspecified to be used for testing knits, fabrics shall be able to be stretched to their original dimensions and remain intact.

7.1.1.2

Findings and visibility markings — excluding emblems, collar stays, elastic, and hook and pile fasteners when placed where theywill not come into direct contact with the body — shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2 , andshall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite.

7.1.2 Thermal Stability.

7.1.2.1

Textile fabrics, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for thermal stability as specified in Section 8.3 , and shall notmelt, ignite, or stick to the glass plates and shall have a rating of resistance to blocking of 1 or 2.

7.1.2.2

All thread utilized in work apparel shall be tested for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.7 , and shall not melt at or below260°C (500°F).

7.1.3 Seam Strength.

7.1.3.1

Garment major seams shall be tested for seam strength as specified in Section 8.4 , and shall have a minimum breakingstrength of 133 N (30 lb) for either thread or fabric.

7.1.3.2

Seam strength shall be considered acceptable where the fabric strength is less than the required seam strength specified in7.1.3.1 , provided the fabric fails without seam failure below the applicable forces specified in 7.1.3.1 .

7.1.4 Product Label Printing Durability.

Product labels shall be tested for printing durability as specified in Section 8.5 , and shall be legible.

7.2 Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance.

(See Section B.1 .)

7.2.1

Woven and nonwoven textiles, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2 ,Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, and shall not shrink more than 10percent in any direction.

7.2.2

Knits, excluding interlinings shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2 , Heat and ThermalShrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions,shall not break, and shall not shrink more than 18 percent in any direction..

7.2.3

Findings and visibility markings — excluding both emblems and collar stays, elastic, and hook and pile fasteners when placedwhere they will not come into direct contact with the body — shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section8.2 , Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite.

7.2 Thermal Stability.

(See Section B.2 )

7.2.1

Textiles, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for thermal stability as specified in Section 8.3 , Thermal Stability Test,and shall not melt, ignite, or stick to the glass plates and shall have a rating of resistance to blocking of 1 or 2.

7.2.2

All thread utilized in the station/work uniform apparel garments shall be tested for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.7 ,Thread Heat Resistance Test, and shall not melt at or below 260°C (500°F). (See Section B.6 .)


1 of 4 6/4/2014 1:21 PM

PCs [2]

PCs [5]

7.3 Seam Strength.

Garment major seams shall be tested for seam strength as specified in Section 8.4 , Seam Breaking Strength Test, and shallhave a minimum breaking strength of 133 N (30 lb) for either thread or fabric. (See Section B.3 .)

7.2 Product Label Printing Durability.

Product labels shall be tested for printing durability as specified in Section 8.5 , Label Print Durability Test, and shall be legible.(See Section B.4 .)

7.2* Optional Requirements for Flame-Resistant Station/Work Uniforms Work Apparel .

7.2.1

Where work apparel is represented as being flame resistant it shall also meet the requirements of 7.1 .

7.2.2

Where station/work uniforms are work apparel is represented as being flame resistant, textile fabrics and visibility markings s,excluding interlinings, emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners , and closure tape, shall be tested individually for flameresistance as specified in Section 8.6, Flame Resistance Test, and shall have an average char length of not more than 150 mm (6in.), shall have an average afterflame of not more than 2.0 seconds, and shall not melt or drip. (See Section B.5.)

7.2.3

Where station/work uniforms are work apparel is represented as being flame resistant, visibility markings and small textile items,excluding interlinings, emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners , and closure tape, that are not large enough to meet thespecimen requirements specified in 8.6.3.1 shall be tested for flame resistance as specified in Section 8.6, Flame Resistance Test,and shall not be totally consumed, shall not have afterflame of more than 2.0 seconds, and shall not melt or drip. (See SectionB.5 .)

7.2.4

Where station/work uniforms are represented as being flame resistant, woven and nonwoven textiles, excluding interlinings, shallbe tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2 , Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall notmelt, drip, separate, or ignite, and shall not shrink more than 10 percent in any direction.

7.2.5

Where station/work uniforms are represented as being flame resistant, knits, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually forheat resistance as specified in Section 8.2 , Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, orignite, shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall not break, and shall not shrink more than 10 percent in anydirection.

7.3 Optional Requirements for Odor-Resistant Work Apparel.

7.3.1

Where work apparel is represented as being odor resistant it shall also meet the requirements of Section 7.1 .

7.3.2

Where work apparel is represented as being odor - resistant, textile fabrics, excluding visibility markings, emblems, labels, elastic,hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.8 , and shall have a minimumpercentage reduction of 99.0 percent in 1 hour.

7.4* Optional Requirements for Water-Resistant Work Apparel.

7.4.1

Where work apparel is represented as being water resistant it shall also meet the requirements of Section 7.1 .

7.4.2

Where work apparel is represented as being water resistant, textile fabrics, excluding visibility markings, emblems, labels, elastic,hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, shall be tested as specified in Section 8.9 , and shall have a water absorption of 15percent or less.

7.5* Optional Requirements for Insect Repellent Work Apparel.

7.5.1

Where work apparel is represented as being insect repellent it shall also meet the requirements of Section 7.1 .

7.5.2

Where work apparel is represented as having insect repellent properties, textile materials, excluding interlinings andreinforcements, shall be tested for insect repellency as specified in Section 8.10 , and shall have a permethrin level of 0.025 –

0.135 mg/cm 2 .

7.5.3

Where work apparel is represented as having insect repellent properties as specified in Section 7.5 and are also represented ashaving flame resistant properties as specified in Section "[Quick Mark]"7.2 , textiles, excluding interlinings, emblems, labels,elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, shall be individually re-tested after treatment for insect repellency for flameresistance as specified in Section 8.6 , and shall have an average char length of not more than 150 mm (6 in.), shall have anaverage afterflame time of not more than 2.0 seconds, and shall not melt or drip.


2 of 4 6/4/2014 1:21 PM

PCs [1]

PCs [4]

PCs [4]

PCs [1]

PCs [1]

PCs [2]

PCs [1]

PCs [2]

PCs [1]

PCs [1]

7.5.3

Where work apparel is represented as having insect repellent properties as specified in Section 7.5 and are also represented ashaving flame resistant properties as specified in Section 7.2 , textiles, excluding interlinings, emblems, labels, elastic, hook andpile fasteners, and closure tape, shall be individually re-tested after treatment for insect repellency for flame resistance asspecified in Section 8.6 , and shall have an average char length of not more than 150 mm (6 in.), shall have an averageafterflame time of not more than 2.0 seconds, and shall not melt or drip.

7.3 Optional Requirements for Visibility Markings.

7.3.1

Where visibility markings are used on garments, the visibility markings shall comply with the requirements of 7.1.2 .

7.3.2

Where the garment is certified to the optional flame resistance requirement, the visibility markings shall comply with the optionalflammability requirements in .

7.4 Optional Requirements for Moisture-Wicking Station/Work Uniforms.

Where station/work uniforms are represented as being moisture-wicking, textiles, excluding interlinings and reinforcements, shallbe tested for the liquid wicking rate, as specified in Section 8.8 , Liquid Wicking Rate Test, and shall have a water rise time of 30seconds.

7.5 Optional Requirements for Odor Resistant Station/Work Uniforms.

Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistant properties, textiles shall be tested for the microbialresistance, as specified in Section 8.9 , Odor Resistance Effectiveness Test, and shall have a 99.9% reduction of bacteria.

7.6 Optional Requirements for Moisture Management Station/Work Uniforms.

7.6.1

Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pilefasteners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually asspecified in Section 8.10 , Liquid Moisture Management Properties, and shall have a minimum Overall Moisture ManagementCapability (OMMC) grading of 0.8.

7.6.2

Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pilefastners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually asspecified in Section 8.12, Vertical Wicking Test with a minimum wicking rate of 2" in 20 minutes.

7.6.3

Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pilefastners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually as

specified in Section 8.13 , Air Permeability Test, and shall have a minimum air flow rate of 200 cfm/ft 2 .

7.7 Optional Requirements for Odor Control Station/Work Uniforms.

7.7.1

Where station/work uniforms are represented as being odor control, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pilefasteners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually asspecified in Section 8.11, Antibacterial Finish Test, and shall have a minimum reduction of 99.0 percent in 24 hours.

7.8 Optional Requirements for Liquid Resistant Station/Work Uniforms.

7.8.1

Where station/work uniforms are represented as water resistance textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pilefasteners, and closure tape shall be tested as specified in Section 8.14 Water Absorption Resistance Test, and shall have a waterabsorption of 15percent or less.


3 of 4 6/4/2014 1:21 PM

PCs [1]

7.9 Optional Requirements for Insect Repellency Station/Work Uniform.

7.9.1

Where station/work uniforms are represented as having insect repellency properties, textiles, excluding interlinings andreinforcements, shall be tested for insect repellency as specified in Section 8.15 , and shall have 0.52 percent of permethrinweight/weight ± 10 percent.


4 of 4 6/4/2014 1:21 PM



Quick Print

PCs [1]


Chapter 8 Test Methods

8.1 Sample Preparation Procedures.

8.1.1 Application.

8.1.1.1

The sample preparation procedures contained in Section 8.1 shall apply to each test method in this chapter, as specificallyreferenced in the sample preparation section of each test method.

8.1.1.2

Only the specific sample preparation procedure or procedures referenced in the sample preparation section of each test methodshall be applied to that test method.

8.1.2 Room Temperature Conditioning Procedure.

8.1.2.1

Specimens shall be conditioned at a temperature of 21°C, ±3°C (70°F, ±5°F) and a relative humidity of 65 percent, ±5 percent, untilequilibrium is reached, as determined in accordance with Section 4 of Federal Test Method 191A, Textile Test Methods, or for atleast 24 hours, whichever is shortest.

8.1.2.2

Specimens shall be tested within 5 minutes after removal from conditioning.

8.1.3 Washing and Drying Procedure.

8.1.3.1

Specimens shall be subjected to 25 cycles of washing and drying in accordance with the procedure specified in AATCC 135,Dimensional Changes of Fabrics in Automatic Home Laundering , using Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V, and DryingProcedure Ai.

8.1.3.2

Flame resistant textiles being tested to the Flame Resistance Test as specified in Section8.6 shall be subjected to 100 cycles ofwashing and drying in accordance with the procedure specified in AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics in Automatic HomeLaundering using Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V, and Drying Procedure Ai.

8.1.3.3

A 1.8 kg, ±0.1 kg (4 lb, ±0.2 lb) load shall be used.

8.1.3.4

A laundry bag shall not be used.

8.1.4 Commercial Dry-Cleaning Procedure.

8.1.4.1

Specimens shall be subjected to 25 cycles of dry cleaning as specified in the procedures of Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158,Dimensional Changes in Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method.

8.1.4.2

Flame resistant textiles being tested to the Flame Resistance Test as specified in Section 8.6shall be subjected to 100 cycles of drycleaning as specified in the procedures of Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes in Dry-Cleaning inPerchloroethylene: Machine Method.

8.2 Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test.

8.2.1 Application.

8.2.1.1

This test method shall apply to textiles,visibility markings, and findings.

8.2.1.2

Modifications to this test method for testing woven and nonwoven textiles shall be as specified in 8.2.8.

8.2.1.3

Modifications to this test method for visibility markings and findings shall be as specified in 8.2.9.



1 of 14 6/4/2014 1:22 PM



PCs [1]



8.2.1.4

Modifications to this test method for testing knits shall be as specified in 8.2.10 .

8.2.2 Samples.

8.2.2.1

Samples for preconditioning shall be a 1 m (1 yd) square of textile.

8.2.2.2

If the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3.1

8.2.2.3

If the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be dry cleaned,separate samples shall be preconditioned according to8.1.4.1

8.2.3 Specimens.

8.2.3.1

Heat resistance testing only shall be conducted on a minimum of three specimens for each finding not excluded in 7.1.1.2.

8.2.3.2

Both heat and thermal shrinkage resistance testing shall be conducted on a minimum of three specimens for each textile.

8.2.3.3

Specimens shall be tested both before and after the preconditioning specified in either 8.2.2.2 or 8.2.2.3.

8.2.3.4

All specimens shall be conditioned as specified in 8.1.2 prior to testing.

8.2.4 Apparatus.

The test oven shall be as specified in ASTM F 2894, Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing andEquipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven .

8.2.5 Procedure.

Testing shall be performed in accordance with ASTM F 2894, Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothingand Equipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven, using the following parameters:

(1) The test temperature shall be 260°C, +6/-0°C (500°F, +10/-0°F).

(2) The optional stretching frame shall be used, as specified in 8.2.10.5 and 8.2.10.6 , to evaluate knit materials, wherespecified by the fabric manufacturer .

8.2.6 Report.

8.2.6.1

Observations of ignition, melting, dripping, or separation for each specimen shall be recorded and reported.

8.2.6.2

The percent change in the width and length dimensions of each textile specimen shall be calculated and recorded.

8.2.6.3

Results shall be reported as the average of all three specimens in each direction.

8.2.7 Interpretation.

8.2.7.1

Any evidence of ignition, melting, dripping, or separation on any specimen shall constitute failing performance.

8.2.7.2

The average percent shrinkage change in each direction shall be used to determine pass/fail.

8.2.7.3

Failure in any one direction shall constitute failure for the entire sample.

8.2.8 Specific Requirements for Testing Woven and Nonwoven Testing Textiles.

8.2.8.1

Each specimen shall be 380 mm × 380 mm, ±13 mm (15 in. × 15 in., ±1⁄2 in.).

8.2.8.2

Testing shall be performed as specified in 8.2.2 through 8.2.7.


2 of 14 6/4/2014 1:22 PM


PCs [1]

PCs [2]

PCs [1]

8.2.8.3

Observations of ignition, melting, dripping, or separation shall be recorded and reported.

8.2.8.4

Five minutes after the specified exposure, and prior to measuring shrinkage, woven and nonwoven textile specimens shall berestored to their original state by manually flattening any curling or rippling that resulted from the specified exposure.

8.2.9 Specific Requirements for Testing Findings and Visibility Markings.

8.2.9.1

Specimens shall be in the center of 150 mm × 150 mm, ±13 mm (6 in. × 6 in., ±1⁄2 in.) pieces of the garment textile.

8.2.9.2

Hardware shall be affixed in a fashion representative of their use in the finished product.

8.2.9.3


8.2.9.4

Thermal shrinkage shall not be measured.

8.2.10 Specific Requirements for Testing Knits.

8.2.10.1

Each specimen shall be 380 mm × 380 mm ±13 mm (15 in. × 15 in. ±1 ⁄2 1⁄2 in. ).

8.2.10.2


8.2.10.3

Observations of ignition, melting, dripping, separation, breaking, or inability to be stretched to the original dimensions or separationfor each specimen shall be recorded and reported.

8.2.10.4

Any evidence of ignition, melting, dripping, separation, breaking, or inability to be stretched to the original dimensions shallconstitute failing performance. or separation for each specimen shall be recorded and reported.

8.2.10.5

Where the use of the optional stretching frame is specified by the fabric manufacturer, 5 minutes after the specified exposure, knittextiles shall be pulled to their original dimensions and held for 10 minutes, following by a 10-minute relaxation prior to measuringshrinkage.

8.2.10.6

Where the optional stretching frame is specified to be used, and fabrics exhibit breaking or inability to be stretched to the originaldimensions, this result shall constitute failure.

8.3 Thermal Stability Test.

8.3.1 Application.

This test method shall apply to textiles.

8.3.2 Samples.

8.3.2.1


8.3.2.1.1

Where a 1 m square of textile cannot be obtained, the samples for preconditioning shall be a minimum of the size to be tested.

8.3.2.2

If the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3.1.

8.3.2.3

If the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be dry cleaned, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to8.1.4.1.

8.3.3 Specimens.

8.3.3.1

Thermal stability testing shall be conducted on a minimum of three specimens for each textile.

8.3.3.2

Specimens shall be cut from the preconditioned sample.


3 of 14 6/4/2014 1:22 PM



8.3.3.3

Specimens shall be tested after the preconditioning specified in either 8.3.2.2 or 8.3.2.3.

8.3.3.4


8.3.4 Apparatus.

8.3.4.1

The test oven shall be as specified in ISO 17493 ASTM E F 2894 , Clothing and equipment for protection against heat — Testmethod for convective heat resistance using a hot air circulating oven Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, ProtectiveClothing and Equipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven .

8.3.4.2

Clean borosilicate or soda lime glass plates measuring 100 mm × 100 mm × 3 mm (4 in. × 4 in. × 1⁄8 in.) shall be used.

8.3.5 Procedure.

Specimens shall be tested according to ASTM D 751, Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics, using the Procedures for BlockingResistance at Elevated Temperatures, specified in Sections 84 through 88, with the following modifications:

(1) The glass plates specified in 8.3.4.2 shall be used.

(2) A test temperature of 265°C, +3/-0°C (510°F, +5/-0°F) shall be used.

(3) The specimens shall cool a minimum of 1 hour after removal of the glass plates from the oven.

(4) In removing specimens from the glass plates, the rating of resistance to blocking shall be determined and observations shallbe made whether each specimen sticks to the glass plates or shows evidence of melting or ignition.

In removing specimens from the glass plates, the rating of resistance to blocking shall be determined and observations shallbe made whether each specimen sticks to the glass plates or shows evidence of melting or ignition. The determination of aspecimen sticking to the glass plates shall be made by placing the glass plates and specimen on a flat level surface andraising the top glass plate in a smooth continuous motion with the plate parallel to the surface and observing if the materialseparates from either of the glass plates. If the tested fabric separates from the lower glass plate but clings to the upper glassplate, invert the upper glass, lay it on a flat surface and raise the fabric with a smooth continuous motion. If the fabric does notseparate cleanly from either of the glass plates, or if it lifts the glass plate completely off the surface, then it shall be judged assticking.

(5) Where the specimen size is such that a 102 mm × 102 mm (4 in. × 4 in.) square cannot be achieved, three specimens shall betested folded face to face, and three specimens shall be tested folded back to back.

8.3.6 Report.

8.3.6.1

The condition of each specimen shall be recorded and reported.

8.3.6.2

Where specimens show no damage, the condition shall be recorded and reported as “no damage.”

8.3.6.3

Where specimens stick to the glass plates or show evidence of melting or ignition, the applicable condition shall be recorded andreported. The rating of resistance to blocking shall also be recorded and reported.


8.3.7.1

Observations of any sticking to the glass plate, melting, or ignition for any specimen shall constitute failure for the textile beingtested.

8.3.7.2

A rating of resistance to blocking other than 1 or 2 shall also constitute failing performance.

8.4 Seam Breaking Strength Test.

8.4.1 Application.

8.4.1.1

This test method shall apply to seam assemblies for garments.

8.4.1.2*

This test method shall apply to major seams.

8.4.2 Samples.

8.4.2.1

Samples shall be a straight seam cut from a finished garment or shall be prepared by joining two pieces of the garment textile.

8.4.2.2

Where the sample is prepared by joining two pieces of woven textile, the textile shall be joined as specified in 8.2.1.2 of ASTM D1683, Standard Test Method for Failure in Sewn Seams of Woven Fabrics.


4 of 14 6/4/2014 1:22 PM




PCs [1]


8.4.2.3

Where the sample is prepared by joining two pieces of knit or woven stretch textiles, the textiles shall be joined as specified in 7.2.2of ASTM D 3940, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength (Load) and Elongation of Sewn Seams of Knit or Woven StretchTextile Fabrics . ASTM D 6797, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength of Fabrics Constant Rate of Extension (CRE) BallBurst Test.

8.4.3 Specimens.

8.4.3.1

A minimum of five seam specimens representative of the type of major seam in the garment shall be tested.

8.4.3.2

Specimens to be tested shall be the same thread, seam type, and stitch type used in the finished garment.

8.4.3.3


8.4.4 Procedure.

8.4.4.1

All woven seam assemblies shall be tested in accordance with ASTM D 1683, Standard Test Method for Failure in Sewn Seams ofWoven Fabric. The test machine shall be operated at a rate of 305 mm/min (12 in./min).

8.4.4.2

All knit seam assemblies shall be tested in accordance with ASTM D 3940, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength (Load)and Elongation of Sewn Seams of Knit and Woven Stretch Textile Fabrics. 6797, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength ofFabrics Constant Rate of Extension (CRE) Ball Burst Test . Padding of the clamps shall be permitted to prevent fabric slippage dueto the thickness of the seam. The seam allowance shall be placed facing away from the penetrating ball.

8.4.4.3

Evaluation for sewn seam strength in accordance with Section 11.1 of ASTM D 1683, Standard Test Method for Failure in SewnSeams of Woven Fabrics , shall be used to determine pass/fail performance.

8.4.5 Report.

8.4.5.1

The seam breaking strength for each seam specimen shall be recorded and reported.

8.4.5.2

The average seam breaking strength for each seam type shall also be recorded and reported.


8.4.5.3

The type of seams tested shall be reported as to whether the specimens were cut from the finished garment or prepared fromfabric samples.


The average seam breaking strength for each seam type shall be used to determine pass or fail performance.

8.5 Label Print Durability Test.

8.5.1 Application.

This test method shall apply to garment labels.

8.5.2 Samples.

8.5.2.1

Samples for preconditioning shall be specimens of labels attached in the center of a 1 m (1 yd) square of garment textile.

8.5.2.2

Samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3 where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed.

8.5.2.3

Samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.4 where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be dry cleaned.

8.5.3 Specimens.

8.5.3.1

A minimum of three different specimens shall be tested.

8.5.3.2

Specimens of product labels shall be attached to garment textile.


5 of 14 6/4/2014 1:22 PM


8.5.3.3


8.5.3.4


8.5.4 Procedure.

Specimens shall be examined at a distance of 305 mm (12 in.) by the unaided eye with 20/20 vision or vision corrected to 20/20.

8.5.5 Report.

The legibility of each specimen shall be recorded and reported as pass or fail.


Any one specimen failing the test shall constitute failing performance for the test.

8.6 Flame Resistance Test.

8.6.1 Application.

8.6.1.1

This test method shall apply to flame resistant textiles and visibility markings.

8.6.1.2

Modifications to this test method for testing woven textile materials shall be as specified in 8.6.8.

8.6.1.3

Modifications to this test method for testing knit textile materials shall be as specified in 8.6.9.

8.6.1.4

Modifications to this test method for testing nonwoven textile materials shall be as specified in 8.6.10.

8.6.1.5

Modifications to this test method for testing small textile items not meeting the specimen size requirements of 8.6.3.1 shall be asspecified in 8.6.11.

8.6.1.5.1

Modifications to this test method for testing visibility markings shall be as specified in 8.6.12


8.6.1.6

Modifications to this test method for testing textile materials that are represented as being flame resistant and insect repellentshall be as specified in 8.6.13 .

8.6.2 Samples.

8.6.2.1

Samples for preconditioning shall be 1 m (1 yd) square of each textile material.

8.6.2.2

If the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3.2.

8.6.2.3

If the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be dry cleaned, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to8.1.4.2.

8.6.3 Specimens.

8.6.3.1

Specimens shall consist of a 75 mm × 305 mm (3 in. × 12 in.) rectangle with the long dimension parallel to either the warp or filling,the wale or course, or machine or cross-machine direction of the material.

8.6.3.2

Each individual layer of multilayer material systems or composites shall be separately tested.

8.6.3.3


8.6.3.4


8.6.4 Apparatus.

The test apparatus specified in ASTM D 6413, Flame Resistance of Textiles (Vertical Test), shall be used.

8.6.5 Procedure.

8.6.5.1

Flame resistance testing shall be performed in accordance with ASTM D 6413, Flame Resistance of Textiles (Vertical Test).

8.6.5.2

Each specimen shall be examined for evidence of melting or dripping.


6 of 14 6/4/2014 1:22 PM

8.6.6 Report.

8.6.6.1

Afterflame time and char length shall be recorded and reported for each specimen.

8.6.6.2

The afterflame time shall be recorded and reported to the nearest 0.2 second.

8.6.6.3

The char length shall be recorded and reported to the nearest 3 mm (1⁄8 in.).

8.6.6.4

The average afterflame time and char length for each material shall be calculated, recorded, and reported.

8.6.6.5

Observations of melting or dripping for each specimen shall be recorded and reported.


8.6.7.1

Pass or fail performance shall be based on any observed melting or dripping, the average afterflame time, and the average charlength.

8.6.7.2

Failure in either direction shall constitute failure of the material.

8.6.8 Specific Requirements for Testing Woven Textile Materials.

8.6.8.1

Five specimens from each of the warp and filling directions shall be tested.

8.6.8.2

No two warp specimens shall contain the same warp yarns, and no two filling specimens shall contain the same filling yarns.

8.6.8.3

Samples for conditioning shall be at least a 1 m (1 yd) square of each material.

8.6.8.4


8.6.9 Specific Requirements for Testing Knit Textile Materials.

8.6.9.1

Five specimens from each of the two directions shall be tested.

8.6.9.2

Samples for conditioning shall include material that is a minimum of 75 mm × 305 mm (3 in. × 12 in.).

8.6.9.3


8.6.10 Specific Requirements for Testing Nonwoven Textile Materials.

8.6.10.1

Five specimens from each of the machine and cross machine directions shall be tested.

8.6.10.2

Samples for conditioning shall be at least a 1 m (1 yd) square of each material.

8.6.10.3


8.6.11 Specific Requirements for Testing Small Textile Materials.

8.6.11.1

Five specimens attached to the textile layer as used in the station/work garments shall be tested.

8.6.11.2

The specimens shall be attached to the textile layer such that the bottom exposure edge of the item coincides with the bottomexposure edge of the textile support layer.

8.6.11.3

Samples for conditioning shall be a 1 m (1 yd) square of the textile layer on which the small specimens are attached.

8.6.11.4

Testing shall be performed as specified in 8.6.2 through 8.6.7; however, char length shall not be measured.

8.6.12 Specific Requirements for Testing Visibility Markings.

8.6.12.1

Samples for preconditioning shall be attached to a textile layer measuring 1 m (1 yd) square.


7 of 14 6/4/2014 1:22 PM


8.6.12.2

Where the visibility markings do not meet the specimen size requirements, the markings shall be attached to a textile layer meetingthe specimen size requirements so that the bottom exposure edge of the item coincides with the bottom exposure edge of the textilesupport layer.

8.6.12.3

Testing shall be performed as specified in 8.6.2 through 8.6.7 with the exception that testing shall be limited to only the lengthdirection of the visibility marking material and the char length shall not be measured.


8.6.13 Specific Requirements for Testing Insect Repellent Materials.

8.6.13.1

Textile fabrics that are represented as being both insect repellent and flame resistant shall be tested in both the pre– andpost–insect repellent treatment configurations.

8.6.13.2 Pre-Treated Textile Materials.

8.6.13.2.1

Woven pre–insect repellent treatment textile materials shall be tested in accordance with 8.6.8 .

8.6.13.2.2

Knit pre–insect repellent treatment textile materials shall be tested in accordance with 8.6.9 .

8.6.13.3 Woven Post-Treated Textile Materials.

8.6.13.3.1


8.6.13.3.2

No two warp specimens shall contain the same warp yarns, and no two filling specimens shall contain the same filling yarns.

8.6.13.3.3

Samples shall be permitted to be obtained from yardage or finished garments.

8.6.13.3.4

Testing shall be performed as specified in 8.6.2 through 8.6.7 .

8.6.13.4 Knit Post-Treated Textile Materials.

8.6.13.4.1


8.6.13.4.2

Samples for conditioning shall include material that is a minimum of 75 mm × 305 mm (3 in. × 12 in.).

8.6.13.4.3


8.6.13.4.4


8.6.13.4.4


8.7 Thread Heat Resistance Test.

8.7.1 Application.


This test method shall apply to each type of thread used in the construction of station/work uniforms work apparel .

8.7.2 Samples.

Samples for conditioning shall be 150 mm (6 in.) or greater lengths of thread.

8.7.3 Specimens.

8.7.3.1

A total of three different specimens of each thread type shall be tested.

8.7.3.2


8.7.4 Apparatus.

8.7.4.1

An electrically heated stage, having a circular depression large enough to insert a micro cover glass shall be used. The stage shallhave a variable transformer controlling the rate of heat input into the stage.


8 of 14 6/4/2014 1:22 PM


8.7.4.2

The following equipment shall also be used:

(1) Armored stem thermometer with a range of 20°C to 160°C, accurate to 0.5°C

(2) Armored stem thermometer with a range of 150°C to 300°C, accurate to 1°C

(3) A low-powered magnifying glass

(4) Two micro cover glasses

(5) Spatula, pick needle, or other instrument for applying pressure to the cover glasses

(6) Soxhlet extraction apparatus

8.7.4.3

The following reagents shall be used:

(1) Chloroform, USP

(2)

8.7.5 Procedure.

8.7.5.1

The specimen shall be extracted with chloroform for a minimum of 20 extractions in a Soxhlet extractor and dried. The specimenshall then be cut into lengths of 2 mm (1⁄16 in.) or less).

8.7.5.2

The apparatus shall be calibrated by determining the melting point of a pure material of known melting point. The melting point ofthe pure material shall be in the range of the melting point of the fiber being tested. The value obtained shall agree within 1°C of theknown value.

8.7.5.3

Where the approximate melting point of the specimen is not known before testing, it shall be determined by a trial run.

8.7.5.4

In subsequent determinations immediately following the trial run or initial determination, the stage in each case shall be cooled to atleast 50°C below the expected melting point, before the specimen is placed for testing.

8.7.5.5

The specimen shall be placed in a small mound on a cover glass and covered with another cover glass. The two cover glasses shallbe pressed together and placed in the circular depression on the stage. The temperature of the stage shall be raised to within 15°Cof the expected melting point, and thereafter at a rate of 3°C to 4°C per minute. At this rate of temperature rise, a slight pressureshall be applied on the upper glass cover by pressing with a spatula, pick needle, or other instrument so that the complete fiber is incontact with the cover glass.

8.7.5.6

The specimen shall be observed with the aid of a magnifying glass and the melting point taken as the temperature at which flow ofthe specimen is observed. At the observed melting point, the temperature shall be read to the nearest degree C.

8.7.6 Report.

8.7.6.1

The melting point of the sample unit shall be the average of the results obtained from the specimens tested and shall be recordedand reported to the nearest degree C.

8.7.6.2

The pass or fail results for each specimen tested shall be recorded and reported.


One or more thread specimens failing this test shall constitute failing performance for the thread type.

8.8 Liquid Wicking Rate Test.

8.8.1 Application.

This test method shall apply to the primary textiles used in the construction of the station/work uniform .

8.8.2 Samples.

8.8.2.1


8.8.2.2

Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to8.1.3 .

8.8.2.3

Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be dry cleaned, separate samples shall be preconditioned accordingto 8.1.4 .

8.8.3 Specimens.

A minimum of three specimens shall be tested.

* U.S. Pharmacopeia reference standards for melting point for calibrating the apparatus


9 of 14 6/4/2014 1:22 PM

PCs [1]



8.8.4 Apparatus.

The test set-up shall be as specified in ISO 9073-6, Textiles —Test Methods for Nonwoven—Part 6: Absorption.

8.8.5 Procedure.

Testing shall be conducted in accordance with the liquid wicking rate procedures of ISO 9073-6, Textiles—Test Methods forNonwoven—Part 6: Absorption.

8.8.6 Report.

The time for water to rise 25 mm (1 in.) for each individual specimen and the overall average for all specimens shall be recordedand reported.


Pass/fail determination shall be based on the average reported time for water rise for all specimens tested.

8.9 Odor Resistance Effectiveness Test.

8.9.1 Application.


8.9.2 Samples.

8.9.2.1


8.9.2.2

Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to8.1.3 .

8.9.2.3

Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be dry cleaned, separate samples shall be preconditioned accordingto 8.1.4 .

8.9.3 Specimens.


8.9.4 Apparatus.

The test set-up shall be as specified in AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials, Assessment of.

8.9.5 Procedure.

Testing shall be conducted in accordance with AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials, Assessment of, using bothStaphyloccoccus aureus and Klebsiella pneumonia .

8.9.6 Report.

The percent reduction of bacteria for each specimen shall be recorded and reported.


Pass/fail determination shall be based on the average percent reduction for all specimens tested for each type of bacteria tested.Failing performance for one type of bacteria shall constitute failure of the textile.

8.10 Liquid Moisture Management Properties.

8.10.1 Application.

This test method shall apply to textiles identified as moisture management fabrics

8.10.2 Samples.

8.10.2.1

Samples for conditioning shall be 1 m (1 yd) square of each textile material.

8.10.2.2

Samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3 (25 Wash/Dry).

8.10.3 Apparatus.

The apparatus shall be as specified in AATCC 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties of Textile Fabrics.

8.10.4 Procedure.

Testing shall be performed in accordance with AATCC 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties of Textile Fabrics.

8.10.5 Report.

8.10.5.1

The Overall Moisture Management Capability (OMMC) shall be reported for each specimen.

8.10.5.2

The average OMMC shall be reported for all specimens.


10 of 14 6/4/2014 1:22 PM



PCs [1]


The average OMMC shall be used to determine pass/fail.

8.8 Antibacterial Finish Test. Odor Resistance Test

8.8.1 Application.


This test method shall apply to textiles identified as odor - resistan ce t fabrics.

8.8.2 Samples.

8.8.2.1


8.8.2.2

Samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3 (25 Wash/Dry) .

8.8.3 Specific Requirements for Testing Leaching or Nonbonded Antibacterial Finishes.

8.8.3.1

Where the antibacterial finish to be evaluated is of the leaching or nonbonded type, testing shall be performed in accordance withAATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials: Assessment of, using the following parameters:

(1) The qualitative test procedure shall be used.

(2) The incubation period shall be 24 hours 1 hour .

(3) The test bacteria shall beStaphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumonia.

(4) Three specimens shall be tested for each test bacterium.

8.8.4 Specific Requirements for Testing Nonleaching or Bonded Antibacterial Finishes.

8.8.4.1

Where the antibacterial finish to be evaluated is of the nonleaching or bonded type, testing shall be performed in accordance withASTM E2149, Standard Test Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of Immobilized Antimicrobial Agents Under DynamicContact Conditions, using the following parameters:



8.8.5 Report.

8.8.5.1

The method used for evaluation shall be reported.

8.8.5.2

The percent reduction shall be reported for each specimen.

8.8.5.3

The average percent reduction shall be reported for all specimens.


The average percent reduction shall be used to determine pass/fail.

8.12 Vertical Wicking Test.

8.12.1 Application

8.12.1.1

This test method shall apply to optional moisture management garment textiles.

8.12.2 Samples

8.12.2.1

A sample size of 152 mm × 25 mm (6 in. × 1 in.) shall be cut with the 152 mm (6 in.) cut measured in the wale direction.

8.12.3 Specimens

8.12.3.1

Specimens shall be conditioned as specified in 8.1.2 .

8.12.4 Apparatus.

8.12.4.1

A 500 ml (17 oz) Erlenmeyer flask shall be filled with 200 ml (7 oz) of colored distilled water (food coloring used shall be acontrasting color to the cloth material to make the water level visible on the sample).

8.12.5 Procedure.


11 of 14 6/4/2014 1:22 PM


PCs [1]

8.12.5.1

The test shall be conducted in the following manner:

Pierce the top edge of the sample with a long straight pin and suspend it from the top of the flask

After 1 minute, remove the sample from the flask

Measure and record the water level on the sample in inches

Return the sample to the flask

Remeasure in 3 minutes, 5 minutes, and at each subsequent 5-minute interval until either the water level reaches 6 in. or 1hour has elapsed

8.12.6 Report.

8.12.6.1

Values are reported as inches per hour.

8.12.6.2

A minimum of three samples shall be tested with the average value reported along with each individual measurement.


8.12.7.1

The average water levels for each specimen tested shall be used to determine pass/fail performance.

8.13 Air Permeability Test.

8.13.1 Application.

8.13.1.1


8.13.2 Samples.

8.13.2.1


8.13.3 Specimens.

8.13.3.1

Specimens shall be conditioned as specified in 8.1.2

8.13.4 Apparatus.

8.13.4.1

The test apparatus specified in ASTM D 737, Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics, shall be used.

8.13.5 Procedure.

8.13.5.1

Air permeability testing shall be performed in accordance with ASTM D 737, Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of TextileFabrics.

8.13.6 Report.

8.13.6.1

The air flow rate for each specimen tested shall be recorded and reported to the nearest cfm/ft 2 .

8.13.6.2

The average air flow rate of all specimens shall be calculated and reported to the nearest cfm/ft 2 .


8.13.7.1

The average air flow rate for the specimens tested shall be used to determine pass/fail performance.

8.9 Water Absorption Resistance Test.

8.9.1 Application.

8.9.1.1

This test method shall apply to water- resistant textiles.

8.9.2 Samples.

8.9.2.1

Samples for conditioning shall be at least 1 m (1 yd) square of each material.


12 of 14 6/4/2014 1:22 PM



8.9.2.2

If the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to8.1.3.1 8.1.3.2 .

8.9.2.2

If the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to8.1.3.1 8.1.3.2 .

8.9.2.3

If the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be dry cleaned, separate samples shall be preconditioned accordingto8.1.4.2 .

8.9.3 Specimens.

8.9.3.1

Specimens shall be 200 mm × 200 mm (8 in. × 8 in.).

8.9.3.2

At least three specimens shall be tested.

8.9.3.3

Specimens shall be tested after the preconditioning specified in 8.9.2.2 or 8.9.2.3.

8.9.3.4


8.9.4 Apparatus.

The test apparatus shall be as specified in AATCC 42, Water Resistance: Impact Penetration Test, with the following modifications:

(1) A metal roller 113 mm ±6 mm (41⁄2 in. ±1⁄4 in.) long and weighing 1 kg (21⁄4 lb) shall be used.

(2) Embroidery hoops measuring 150 mm to 180 mm (6 in. to 7 in.) in diameter shall be used for mounting the specimen.

8.9.5 Procedure.

8.9.5.1

The conditioned specimen shall be securely mounted in the embroidery hoops with sufficient tension to ensure a uniformly smoothsurface.

8.9.5.2

The direction of the flow of water down the specimen shall coincide with the warpwise direction of the specimen as placed on thestand.

8.9.5.3

The mounted specimen shall be placed on the block with the center of the specimen directly beneath the center of the nozzle andthe plane of the surface of the specimen at a 45-degree angle with the horizontal.

8.9.5.4

A 500 mL (17 oz) volume of distilled water at a temperature of 27°C ±1°C (80°F ±2°F) shall be poured quickly into the funnel andallowed to spray onto the specimen.

8.9.5.5

The following operations shall then be executed as rapidly as possible:

(1) The specimen shall be removed from the hoops and placed between sheets of blotting paper on a flat horizontal surface.

(2) The metal roller shall be rolled quickly forward and back one time over the paper without application of any pressure other thanthe weight of the roller.

(3) A square 100 mm × 100 mm (4 in. × 4 in.) shall be cut out of the center of the wet portion of the specimen and weighed to thenearest 0.05 g. This weight shall be designated the “wet weight.” Not more than 30 seconds shall elapse between the time thewater has ceased flowing through the spray nozzle and the start of the weighing.

(4) The same 100 mm (4 in.) square shall be conditioned as specified in 8.1.2 until it has dried and reached moisture equilibriumwith the surrounding standard atmosphere for textiles.

(5) Following the conditioning in 8.9.5.5, the square shall be reweighed, and this weight designated as the “dry weight.”

8.9.5.6

The percent water absorption shall be calculated using the following equation:

Percent water absorption = [(wet weight - dry weight)/(dry weight)] × 100

8.9.6 Report.

8.9.6.1

The percent water absorption for each specimen shall be recorded and reported.

8.9.6.2

The average percent water absorption for all tested specimens shall be calculated and reported.


13 of 14 6/4/2014 1:22 PM



The average percent water absorption shall be used to determine pass/ performance.

8.10 Optional Insect Repellency Test. Reserved.

(See Garment Specification for Trouser, Army Combat Uniform, GL-PD 07-14C, Evaluation of Permethrin Treated FabricMaterials: Extraction and Analysis by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.)

8.10.1 Application.

This test method shall apply to textile materials identified as insect repellent.

8.10.2 Samples.

Samples shall be as specified in section 4.5.1 of Department of Defense GL/PD 07-13C Purchase Description Coat, ArmyCombat Uniform .

8.10.3 Procedure.

Testing and conditioning shall be as specified in section 4.5.1 of Department of Defense GL/PD 07-13C Purchase DescriptionCoat, Army Combat Uniform .

8.10.4 Report.

The individual concentration for each specimen in milligrams per square centimeter permethrin to the nearest 0.001 mg, shall bereported.


Failure of an individual specimen shall constitute failure of the material.


14 of 14 6/4/2014 1:22 PM



Quick Print


PCs [1]


Annex A Explanatory Material

Annex A is not a part of the requirements of this NFPA document but is included for informational purposes only. This annexcontains explanatory material, numbered to correspond with the applicable text paragraphs.

A.1.1.2

Station/work uniform garments are Work apparel is made from thermally stable materials. Garments such as fitness clothing andunderclothing might not be made from thermally stable materials and should not be worn while on duty. Such non-thermally stablegarments are made from fibers with relatively low melting points and can can contribute to burn injury. These types of performancefitness clothing should also not be worn as undergarments beneath work apparel.

Global FR-3 Hide Deleted

A.1.1.5

Station/work uniforms Work apparel that are certified as compliant only with NFPA 1975 are not primary protective garments andcannot be relied on to provide protection from specific hazards, such as those encountered during structural or wildland fire fighting.Other standards are written for garments that provide primary protection for specific hazards to which fire fighters can be exposedwhile participating in emergency operations or training. However, compliant station/work uniforms work apparel could also becertified to another standard for primary protective garments and thus be both a primary protective garment for the specific hazardthat the other standard addresses and a station/work uniform work apparel that is compliant with NFPA 1975. Station/work uniformsthat receive such dual certification (to NFPA 1975 and to a primary protective garment standard) would always exceed the minimumrequirements of NFPA 1975. Examples of primary protective garment standards include, but are not limited to, NFPA 1951,Standard on Protective Ensembles for Technical Rescue Incidents ; NFPA 1977, Standard on Protective Clothing and Equipmentfor Wildland Fire Fighting ; NFPA 1994, Standard on Protective Ensembles for First Responders to CBRN Incidents ; and NFPA1999, Standard on Protective Clothing for Emergency Medical Operations .

A.1.1.6


The authority having jurisdiction should conduct a risk assessment and determine the level of visibility required for station/workuniforms work apparel based on the anticipated use of such garments during these incidents. Where the AHJ anticipates visibilityhazards, such as darkness, obscuration (smoke, fog, dust), and proximity to traffic, moving machinery, or heavy equipmentoperation, the AHJ should be aware of various types of visibility markings. In the case of personnel operating in proximity to traffic,moving machinery, or heavy equipment in operation, the AHJ needs to understand that special high-visibility markings are requiredby 23 CFR 655. This regulation requires that the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) be followed on all roads opento public travel. In Section 6D.03, the MUTCD specifies that all workers, including emergency responders, within the right-of-waywho are exposed either to traffic or to work vehicles and construction equipment within the Temporary Traffic Control (TTC) zoneshall wear high-visibility safety apparel that meets the Performance Class 2 or 3 requirements of ANSI/ISEA 107, High-VisibilitySafety Apparel and Headwear . Section 6D.03 includes an option specifying that in lieu of ANSI/ISEA 107 apparel, emergency andincident responders and law enforcement personnel within the TTC zone may wear high-visibility safety apparel that meets theperformance requirements of ANSI/ISEA 207, High-Visibility Public Safety Vests . An additional option within Section 6D.03specifies that fire fighters and other emergency responders working within the right-of-way and engaged in emergency operationsthat directly expose them to flame, fire, heat, or hazardous materials may wear retroreflective turn-out gear that is specified andregulated by other organizations, such as NFPA.

ANSI/ISEA 107, High-Visibility Safety Apparel and Headwear, 2004. ANSI/ISEA 207, High-Visibility Public Safety Vests, 2011.

Users are encouraged to conduct a wear trial and develop user findings and reccomendations when dealing with work clothingelements that make claims to provide moisture management. Moisture management clothing can also be described as wicking,active transport, or similar descriptive terms that imply the comfort to the wearer and moving sweat away from the body. Theauthority having jurisdiction should be aware that it can be difficult to objectively quantify findings or such claims. User perceptionof comfort should be considered over such claims of moisture management.


1 of 5 6/4/2014 1:22 PM


A.1.1.9

Emergency response organizations are cautioned that accessories are not a part of the certified product but could be attached tothe certified product by a means not engineered, manufactured, or authorized by the manufacturer. Emergency responseorganizations are cautioned that if the accessory or its means of attachment causes the structural integrity of the certified product tobe compromised, the certified product might not comply with the standard for which it was designed, manufactured, and marketed.Additionally, if the accessory or its attachment means are not designed and manufactured from materials suitable for the hazardousenvironments of emergency incidents, the failure of the accessory or its attachment means could cause injury to the emergencyresponder.

Because the aftermarket for certified product accessories is so broad, fire and emergency response organizations are advised tocontact both the manufacturer of the accessory and the manufacturer of the certified product and verify that the accessory and itsmeans of attachment are suitable for use in the intended emergency response environment. Emergency response organizationsshould seek and receive written documentation from both the accessory manufacturer and the manufacturer of the certified productto validate the following information:

(1) The accessory for a certified product, and its attachment method, will not degrade the designed protection or performance ofthe certified product below the requirements of the product standard to which it was designed, manufactured, tested, andcertified.

(2) The accessory, when properly attached to the certified product, shall not interfere with the operation or function of the certifiedproduct, or with the operation or function of any of the certified product’s component parts.

Users are also cautioned that the means of attachment of the accessory that fail to safely and securely attach the accessory to thecertified product can cause the accessory to be inadvertently dislodged from the certified product and create a risk to the wearer orother personnel in the vicinity.

A.1.2.3


The purchaser should provide the vendor with a detailed specification for the specific performance and design criteria. In addition tothe performance requirements specified in Chapter 7 and to ensure that station/work uniforms work apparel are ordered andmanufactured in a consistent manner, purchasers should consider the development of a detailed purchase specification that shouldinclude the following:

(1) Compliance of the garments with NFPA 1975 .

(2) Reference item numbers for each item required by the purchase specification.

(3) Additional material/component requirements.

(4) Individual sizing. A station/work uniform work apparel that restricts movement or conflicts with the function of primaryprotective garments increases the risk of injury. ASTM F 1731, Practice for Body Measurement and Sizing of Fire and RescueServices Uniforms and Other Thermal Hazard Protective Uniforms , can be useful for sizing station/work uniforms workapparel .

(5) Color.

(6) Number of units.

(7) Special service requirements.

(8) Pockets or emblems (number, type, and detailed description of placement).

(9) Special wrapping and packaging requirements.

(10) Shipment terms and conditions.

(11) Manufacturer's warranty.

Where the purchaser specifies additional requirements that exceed those of NFPA 1975, the purchaser should consider requiringthe vendor to provide test data that demonstrate garment compliance with the additional requirements of the purchasing agreement.Test methods and test procedures should be discussed and agreed on by the purchaser and vendor as part of the specificationsacceptance process.

To facilitate effective and consistent communications between the purchaser and the vendor, specific contact persons should bedesignated to address such issues as contract requirements, order status, delivery schedules, and problem resolution.

The purchaser should develop a coordinated system to maintain records on purchase order details and specifications, testingresults for any requested performance criteria that exceeds the requirements of NFPA 1975, vendor performance, deliveryschedules, and invoice inventory. The purchase specifications and the system should provide the procedures needed to addresscompliance or noncompliance with the purchasing contract.

A.1.3.6


Emergency services organizations (fire, hazardous materials, law enforcement, medical, skilled trades, technical rescue, USAR)should determine what requirements for use of station/work uniforms station/ work apparel apply in their jurisdiction. Regulations ofnational, state/provincial, regional/county/district, and local government occupational safety and health agencies, and policies ofinsurance or underwriters organizations should be studied for their application to operations conducted by the emergency servicesorganization.


A.2.3.5

A copy of this document may be obtained by forwarding a request to: US Army Natick Research, Development and EngineeringCenter, Attn: RDNS-WPW-C, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760-5019.


2 of 5 6/4/2014 1:22 PM


A.3.2.1 Approved.

The National Fire Protection Association does not approve, inspect, or certify any installations, procedures, equipment, or materials;nor does it approve or evaluate testing laboratories. In determining the acceptability of installations, procedures, equipment, ormaterials, the authority having jurisdiction may base acceptance on compliance with NFPA or other appropriate standards. In theabsence of such standards, said authority may require evidence of proper installation, procedure, or use. The authority havingjurisdiction may also refer to the listings or labeling practices of an organization that is concerned with product evaluations and isthus in a position to determine compliance with appropriate standards for the current production of listed items.

A.3.2.2 Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ).

The phrase “authority having jurisdiction,” or its acronym AHJ, is used in NFPA documents in a broad manner, since jurisdictionsand approval agencies vary, as do their responsibilities. Where public safety is primary, the authority having jurisdiction may be afederal, state, local, or other regional department or individual such as a fire chief; fire marshal; chief of a fire prevention bureau,labor department, or health department; building official; electrical inspector; or others having statutory authority. For insurancepurposes, an insurance inspection department, rating bureau, or other insurance company representative may be the authorityhaving jurisdiction. In many circumstances, the property owner or his or her designated agent assumes the role of the authorityhaving jurisdiction; at government installations, the commanding officer or departmental official may be the authority havingjurisdiction.

A.3.2.4 Listed.

The means for identifying listed equipment may vary for each organization concerned with product evaluation; some organizationsdo not recognize equipment as listed unless it is also labeled. The authority having jurisdiction should utilize the system employedby the listing organization to identify a listed product.

A.3.3.7 Emblems.


Emblems or patches used on station/work uniforms work apparel are not included in the test requirements of this standard. Usersare cautioned that emblems or patches with thick adhesive backings could melt and contribute to burn injury. In particular, users arecautioned about using large emblems or patches on station/work uniforms work apparel because these items are not tested forheat or flame resistance.

A.3.3.9 Flame Resistance (Protective Apparel) .

Flame resistance can be an inherent property of the textile material, or it can be imparted by specific treatment. Flame resistancecan be an inherent property of the textile material, or it can be imparted by specific treatment.

A.3.3.22 Product Label.

The product label is not the certification organization's label, symbol, or identifying mark; however, the certification organization'slabel, symbol, or identifying mark can be attached to it or be part of the product label.

A.3.3.25 Visibility Markings.

Retroreflective enhancements improve night-time conspicuity, and fluorescent enhancements improve day-time conspicuity.

A.4.1.8



The NFPA, from time to time, has received complaints that certain items of fire and emergency services protective clothing orprotective equipment might be carrying labels falsely identifying them as compliant with an NFPA standard. The requirement forplacing the certification organization's mark on or attached to the product label is to help ensure that the purchaser can readilydetermine compliance of the respective product through independent third-party certification.

NFPA advises those purchasing station/work uniforms work apparel or garments to be aware of the following:

For station/work uniforms work apparel and garments to meet the requirements of NFPA 1975 , Standard on Station/WorkUniforms for Emergency Services , they must be certified by an independent third-party certification organization. In addition, theitem must carry the label, symbol, or other identifying mark of that certification organization .

Any station/work uniform work apparel garment that does not bear the mark and label of an independent third-partycertification organization is NOT COMPLIANT with NFPA 1975 , even if the product label states that the garment iscompliant.

For further information about certification and product labeling, Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 of NFPA 1975 should be referenced.Also, the definitions for labeled and listed in Section 3.2 and the definition certification/certified in Section 3.3 should bereviewed.

Third-party certification is an important means of ensuring the quality of emergency services protective clothing and equipment. Tobe certain that an item is properly certified, labeled, and listed, the NFPA strongly recommends that prospective purchasers requireappropriate evidence of certification for the specific product and model from the manufacturer before purchasing. Prospectivepurchasers should also contact the certification organizations and request copies of the certification organization's “list” of certifiedproducts to the appropriate NFPA standard. This “listing” is a requirement of third-party certification by this standard and is a serviceperformed by the certification organization.

All NFPA standards on fire and emergency services protective clothing and equipment require that the item be certified by anindependent third-party certification organization and, as with NFPA 1975 station/work uniform work apparel garments, all items ofemergency services protective clothing and equipment must carry the label, symbol, or other identifying mark of that certificationorganization.

Any item of protective clothing or protective equipment covered by an NFPA standard that does not bear the mark andlabel of an independent third-party certification organization is NOT COMPLIANT with the appropriate NFPA standard,even if the product label states that the item is compliant.


3 of 5 6/4/2014 1:22 PM

A.4.2.1

The certification organization should have sufficient breadth of interest and activity so that the loss or award of a specific businesscontract would not be a determining factor in the financial well-being of the agency.

A.4.2.5

The contractual provisions covering certification programs should contain clauses advising the manufacturer that if requirementschange the product should be brought into compliance with the new requirements by a stated effective date through a compliancereview program involving all currently listed products.

Without these clauses, certifiers would not be able to move quickly to protect their name, marks, or reputation. A product safetycertification program would be deficient without these contractual provisions and the administrative means to back them up.

A.4.2.6

Investigative procedures are important elements of an effective and meaningful product safety certification program. A preliminaryreview should be carried out on products submitted to the agency before any major testing is undertaken.

A.4.2.7.1

For further information and guidance on recall programs, see 21 CFR 7, Subpart C.

A.4.2.9

Such inspections should include, in most instances, witnessing of production tests. With certain products, the certificationorganization inspectors should select samples from the production line and submit them to the main laboratory for counterchecktesting. With other products, purchasing samples in the open market for test purposes might be desirable.

A.4.5.4

For example, this situation exists when a product is wholly manufactured and assembled by another entity or entities for a separateentity that puts its name and label on the product (frequently called “private labeling”) and markets and sells the product as its ownproduct.

A.4.5.5

Subcontractors include, but are not limited to, a person or persons, company, firm, corporation, partnership, or other organizationhaving an agreement with or under contract with the compliant product manufacturer to supply or assemble the compliant productor portions of the compliant product.

A.4.6.1

ISO 27, Guidelines for corrective action to be taken by a certification body in the event of misuse of its mark of conformity, is acomponent of accreditation of certification organizations specified in 4.1.4 and 4.2.3 of this standard. Those paragraphs contain amandatory reference to ISO 65, General requirements for bodies operating product certification systems, in which ISO 27 isreferenced.

A.4.6.2

By definition, a hazard might involve a condition that can be imminently dangerous to the end-user. With this thought in mind, theinvestigation should be started immediately and completed in as timely a manner as is appropriate considering the particulars of thehazard being investigated.

A.4.6.11

The determination of the appropriate corrective action for the certification organization to initiate should take into consideration theseverity of the product hazard and its potential consequences to the safety and health of end users. The scope of testing andevaluation should consider, among other things, testing to the requirements of the standard to which the product was listed ascompliant, the age of the product, the type of use and conditions to which the compliant product has been exposed, care andmaintenance that has been provided, the use of expertise on technical matters outside the certification organization's area ofcompetence, and product hazards caused by circumstances not anticipated by the requirements of the applicable standard. As aguideline for determining which is more appropriate, a safety alert or a product recall, the following product hazard characteristicsare provided, which are based on 42 CFR 84, Subpart E, §84.41:

(1) Critical: A product hazard that judgment and experience indicate is likely to result in a condition immediately hazardous to lifeor health (IHLH) for individuals using or depending on the compliant product. If an IHLH condition occurs, the user will sustain,or will be likely to sustain, an injury of a severity that could result in loss of life, or result in significant bodily injury or loss ofbodily function, either immediately or at some point in the future.

(2) Major A: A product hazard, other than Critical, that is likely to result in failure to the degree that the compliant product does notprovide any protection or reduces protection, and is not detectable to the user. The phrase reduces protection means thefailure of specific protective design(s) or feature(s) that results in degradation of protection in advance of reasonable lifeexpectancy to the point that continued use of the product is likely to cause physical harm to the user, or where continueddegradation could lead to IHLH conditions.

(3) Major B: A product hazard, other than Critical or Major A, that is likely to result in reduced protection and is detectable to theuser. The phrase reduces protection means the failure of specific protective design(s) or feature(s) that results in degradationof protection in advance of reasonable life expectancy to the point that continued use of the product is likely to cause physicalharm to the user, or where continued degradation could lead to IHLH conditions.

(4) Minor: A product hazard, other than Critical, Major A, or Major B, that is not likely to materially reduce the usability of thecompliant product for its intended purpose or a product hazard that is a departure from the established applicable standardand has little bearing on the effective use or operation of the compliant product for its intended purpose.

Where the facts are conclusive, based on characteristics of the hazard classified as indicated previously, the certificationorganization should consider initiating the following corrective actions with the authorized and responsible parties:

(1) Critical product hazard characteristics: product recall

(2) Major A product hazard characteristics: product recall or safety alert, depending on the nature of the specific product hazard

(3) Major B product hazard characteristics: safety alert or no action, depending on the nature of the specific product hazard

(4) Minor product hazard characteristic: no action


4 of 5 6/4/2014 1:22 PM





A.5.2.6(3)

To avoid possible damage to the garment and possible reduction and loss of inherent or treated flame resistance characteristics ofthe garment, the manufacturer should be contacted prior to disinfecting or cleaning the garment by a method not prescribed on theproduct. Station/work uniforms Work apparel should not be cleaned in home washing machines. See 5.1.7 and 5.2.6 5.2.6 forinformation regarding how to identify the manufacturer and the garment.

For information on the prevention and transmission of communicable diseases and carcinogens caused by contaminated garments,see NFPA 1581, Standard on Fire Department Infection Control Program, and OSHA regulation 29 CFR 1910.1030, or consult theCenters for Disease Control, the local board of public health, the American Medical Association, the U.S. Fire Administration, theEnvironmental Protection Agency, or the International Association of Fire Fighters.

A.7.2

Two separate test requirements are provided for manufacturers who wish to claim use of flame resistant textile fabrics in theirmanufacture of station/work uniforms work apparel . When the requirements found in 7.2 7.2.2 , 7.5.1 , and 7.5.2 are met,additional label language is used to indicate that the garments are flame resistant.

A.7.4


For the purpose of this standard, water resistance is defined as “a finish or inherent property [of a fabric] that limits theabsorption of water.” Water resistance may also encompass other properties including water repellency and water penetrationresistance. These additional test properties can be applied if other types of water resistance are required or desired for thespecific uniform work apparel item under consideration.


A.7.5

It is important that users understand that insect repellency is a finish or treatment and that performance or bite protection is likelyto decline over time and after laundering.

A.8.4.1.2

Examples of major seams include but are not limited to seat seams, side seams, and inseams of pants; seat seams, side seams,inseams, yoke seams, sleeve set, and shoulder seams of coveralls; and yoke seams, side seams, sleeve set, side seams, andshoulder seams of shirts. Major seams do not include seams that do not expose the wearer’s skin or undergarments when ruptured,for example, pocketing or emblem seams.

A.8.7.4.3(2)

Six standards for use in calibrating melting point apparatus can be obtained from the U.S. Pharmacopeia Reference Standards, 46Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016.


5 of 5 6/4/2014 1:22 PM



Quick Print




Annex B Information on Performance Requirements and Test Methods

This annex is not a part of the requirements of this NFPA document but is included for informational purposes only.

B.1 Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance.

B.1.1 Test Method Cited.

Test method appears in Section 8.2; ISO 17493 is used. Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes ofFabrics After Home Laundering, (Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V, Drying Procedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and9.3 of AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method.

B.1.2 Description of Test Method.

Material specimens are suspended in a forced air–circulating oven at 260°C (500°F) both before and after 25 wash/dry cycles ordry-cleaning cycles, whichever practice is specified for the material. Following a 5-minute exposure, the sample is removed andvisually examined for evidence of melting, dripping, separation, or ignition. Samples that demonstrate such behavior fail the test.Material specimens are also measured and marked for size. Following the oven exposure, the dimensions of the materialspecimens are compared to the original dimensions.

B.1.3 Application of Test Method.


The purpose of the test is to prevent materials or components that ignite, melt, drip, or separate during exposure to high heat frombeing used in station/work uniforms work apparel . This test also examines what happens to a material after exposure to hightemperatures. Thermal shrinkage of fabric can contribute to burn injury severity due to increased heat transfer, restriction of bodymovement, or the breaking open of fabric.

B.2 Thermal Stability.


The test method appears in Section 8.3, Method 1.A modified form of ASTM D 751, Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics, isused. . Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering,(Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V, Drying Procedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158, DimensionalChanges on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method.


Material specimens are folded twice and pressed between glass plates that are then put in a forced air-circulating oven at 265°C(510°F) both before and after 25 wash/dry cycles or dry-cleaning cycles, whichever practice is specified for the material. Following a6-hour exposure, the specimens between the glass plates are removed from the oven and allowed to cool. Specimens are thenremoved from the glass plates and evaluated for rating of resistance to blocking. The specimens are also examined for evidence ofsticking to the glass plates, melting, or igniting. Samples that demonstrate such behavior fail the test.


The purpose of the test is to prevent the use of material that could stick to the wearer's skin or underclothing during a high heat orflame exposure.

B.3 Seam Breaking Strength.


The test method appears in Section 8.4 and uses ASTM D 1683/D 1683M, Standard Test Method for Failure in Sewn Seams ofWoven Apparel Fabrics, for woven fabrics or ASTM D 3940, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength (load) and Elongation ofSewn Seams of Knit or Woven Stretch Textile Fabrics ASTM D 6797, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength of FabricsConstant Rate of Extension (CRE) Ball Burst Test for knit fabrics.


Two different methods are used, one for woven fabrics and the second for knit fabrics. The strength of a woven material seam ismeasured in the same way as material tensile strength. In this test, a material seam specimen is placed between two grips in atensile testing machine and pulled until it breaks. A burst test is used for knit seams where the material seam specimen is placed ona tensile machine with a 25 mm (1 in.) diameter ball and a circular clamp. The tensile testing machine is used to push the ballthrough the specimen. The force at which the specimen breaks is the seam strength. The seam strength is measured beforelaundering.


B.3.3 Application of the Test Method.

The purpose of this test is to require a minimum seam strength of 133 N (30 lb) for seams used in stress areas of the garment.

B.4 Label Print Durability.


1 of 4 6/4/2014 1:22 PM




Test method appears in Section 8.5. Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135 (Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V, DryingProcedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158.


Labels must contain the required language as stated in NFPA 1975. They are subjected to 25 wash/dry cycles or dry-cleaningcycles, as appropriate for the material, and then examined for legibility.


This requirement checks for label durability. Following this test, the labels must remain legible from a distance of at least 305 mm(12 in.).

B.5 Optional Flame Resistance.


Test method appears in Section 8.6, and ASTM D 6413 is used. Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135 (Machine Cycle 1,Wash Temperature V, Drying Procedure Ai), or dry cleaning per Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158.


A 75 mm × 305 mm (3 in. × 12 in.) material specimen is placed in a holder that is suspended vertically over a 38 mm (11⁄2 in.) highflame. The flame is produced by a methane gas source. The material is placed in contact with the flame at the flame's midpoint for aperiod of 12 seconds. After exposure to the flame, the amount of time during which the specimen continues to burn (afterflame) isrecorded. The length of the burn, or char length, then is measured by attaching a weight to tear the specimen and measuring thelength of the tear along the burn line. Notations are recorded if any melting or dripping is observed. Samples are tested in thismanner both before and after 100 wash/dry cycles or 100 dry-cleaning cycles, whichever practice is specified for the material.


This test is used to determine how readily materials ignite and how long they continue to burn after removal of the ignition source.Materials cannot have an average afterflame time greater than 2 seconds, or a char length greater than 150 mm (6 in.), or exhibitany melting or dripping. Char length is an indicator of thermal stability. This test is not representative of all types of flame contact towhich personnel might be exposed.

B.6 Thread Heat Resistance.


Test method appears in Section 8.7.



A small segment of thread used in the stitching of station/ work apparel uniforms is placed in a flask containing an organic solventand heated. (The solvent extracts substances that would interfere with the test.) Next, the extracted thread segment is put in adevice that slowly heats the thread. The temperature at which the thread begins to melt is the melting temperature.



Thread used in station/ work apparel uniforms must withstand temperatures of up to 260°C (500°F). If the melting temperature isless than 260°C (500°F), the thread fails the test. The temperature, 260°C (500°F), is consistent with the heat resistance test.

B.7 Optional Moisture Management.

B.7.1

The test method appears in Section 8.10; AATCC Test Method 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties of TextileFabrics, is used. Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic HomeLaundering, -(Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V, Drying Procedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method .


The liquid moisture management properties of a textile are evaluated by placing a fabric specimen between two horizontal (upperand lower) electrical sensors each with seven concentric pins. A predetermined amount of test solution that aids themeasurement of electrical conductivity changes are dropped onto the center of the upward-facing test specimen surface. The testsolution is free to move in three directions: radial spreading on the top surface, movement through the specimen from top surfaceto the bottom surface, and radial spreading on the bottom surface of the specimen. During the test, changes in electricalresistance of specimen are measured and recorded. The electrical resistance readings are used to calculate fabric liquid moisturecontent changes that quantify dynamic liquid moisture transport behaviors in multiple directions of the specimen. The summary ofthe measured results are used to grade the liquid moisture management properties of a fabric by using predetermined indices.


The purpose of this test is for the measurement, evaluation, and classification of liquid moisture management properties of textilefabrics. The test method produces objective measurements of liquid moisture management properties of knitted, woven, andnonwoven textile fabrics. The results obtained with this test method are based on water resistance, water repellency, and waterabsorption characteristics of the fabric structure, including the fabric's geometric and internal structure and the wickingcharacteristics of its fibers and yarns. The overall (liquid) moisture management capability (OMMC) is an index of the overallcapability of a fabric to transport liquid moisture as calculated by combining three measured attributes of performance: the liquidmoisture absorption rate on the bottom surface (ARB), the one-way liquid transport capability (R), and the maximum liquidmoisture spreading speed on the bottom surface (SSB).

B.8 Optional Wicking Performance.


2 of 4 6/4/2014 1:22 PM





The test method appears in Section 8.8. Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics AfterAutomatic Home Laundering, (Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V, Drying Procedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and9.3 of AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method .


A 25 mm × 152 mm (1 in. × 6 in.) material specimen is suspended in a flask filled with colored water. The wicking is evaluatedboth before and after 25 wash/dry cycles or dry-cleaning cycles, whichever practice is specified for the material. After 1 minute, 3minutes, 5 minutes, and every 5 minutes thereafter, up to 1 hour, the amount of wicking of the colored water up the fabricspecimen is measured.


This test is used to quantify the wicking performance properties of the fabric.

B.9 Optional Air Permeability.


The test method appears in Section 8.13, ASTM D 737, Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics is used.Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, (MachineCycle 1, Wash Temperature V, Drying Procedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158, DimensionalChanges on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method .


Material specimens are evaluated after 25 wash/dry cycles or dry-cleaning cycles, whichever practice is specified for the material.The material is placed in the test device, and the rate of airflow passing perpendicularly through a known area of fabric ismeasured. From the rate of airflow, air permeability is determined.


This test is used to quantify the air permeability properties of the fabric.

B.7 Optional Odor Control Resistance .


Test method appears in Section 8.9, AATCC Test Method 100, Assessment of Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials; and ASTMTest Method E 2149, Standard Test Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of Immobilized Antimicrobial Agents UnderDynamic Contact Conditions are used. Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics AfterAutomatic Home Laundering, (Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V, Drying Procedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and9.3 of AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method.


Material specimens having antibacterial finishes are exposed to a known concentration of odor-causing bacteria for a specifiedperiod of time. The concentration of the bacteria is evaluated both before and after exposure to the materials. The test methodrequires a 99.9 percent reduction in the bacteria concentration.


The purpose of this test is to provide a quantitative procedure for the evaluation of the degree of antibacterial activity. Two testmethods are cited, and each is specific to the means of bacteriological control. The test methods are similar in their evaluation—thedifference is in the exposure to the sample to the bacteria challenge. The AATCC method uses a static exposure that is appropriatefor non-bonded or leaching type of technologies, and the ASTM method uses a dynamic exposure that is appropriate for bonded ornon-leaching technologies. Both test methods expose the materials to the same odor-causing bacteria.

B.8 Optional Water Resistance.


Test method appears in Section 8.10. A modified version of AATCC 42, Water Resistance, Impact Penetration Test is used.Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, (Machine Cycle1, Wash Temperature V, Drying Procedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes onDry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method.


Material specimens are sprayed with a specified amount of water after 25 wash/dry cycles or dry-cleaning cycles, whicheverpractice is specified for the material. Following the water spray and subsequent wringing of the fabric, the water absorption into thematerial is measured. This is determined by comparing the weight of the sample after wringing to its weight after it has beenallowed to dry in a conditioned environment for 24 hours. This results in a percent water absorption.


The test is used to evaluate the water repellency properties of the fabric.


B.9 Insect Repellency.


This test method appears in section 4.5.1 of Department of Defense GL/PD 07-13C Purchase Description Coat, Army CombatUniform . Conditioning is by laundering 20 cycles per AATCC 135 (Machine Cycle 3, Wash Temperature V, Drying Procedure Aiii).


3 of 4 6/4/2014 1:22 PM


Samples are taken from garments or yardage and evaluated for the mass of permethrin per area using chemical extraction andanalysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). This analysis is done on both as received samples and on samplesthat have been laundered for 20 wash and dry cycles.


The purpose of this test is measure the amount of permethrin in the material. The amount must be within the specified range toensure effectiveness and be within acceptable limits.


4 of 4 6/4/2014 1:22 PM



Quick Print



Annex C Informational References

C.1 Referenced Publications.

The following documents or portions thereof are referenced within this standard for informational purposes only and are thus notpart of the requirements of this document unless also listed in Chapter 2.

C.1.1 NFPA Publications.

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 1581, Standard on Fire Department Infection Control Program, 2005 2015 edition.

NFPA 1951, Standard on Protective Ensembles for Technical Rescue Incidents, 2007 2012 edition.

NFPA 1977, Standard on Protective Clothing and Equipment for Wildland Fire Fighting, 2005 2011 edition.

NFPA 1994, Standard on Protective Ensembles for First Responders to CBRN Terrorism Incidents, 2007 2012 edition.

NFPA 1999, Standard on Protective Clothing for Emergency Medical Operations, 2008 2013 edition.

C.1.2 Other Publications.

C.1.2.1 AATCC Publications.

American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, P.O. Box 12215, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.


AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials: Assessment of, 2004.

AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, 2004.

AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method, 2005.


C.1.2.2 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D 737, Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics , 2008



ASTM D 3940, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength (Load) and Elongation of Sewn Seams of Knit or Woven StretchTextile Fabrics , 1983 (withdrawn 1995).

ASTM D 6413, Flame Resistance of Textiles (Vertical Test), 2011a.

ASTM D 6797 , Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength of Fabrics Constant Rate of Extension (CRE) Ball Burst Test , 2007(2011).

ASTM F 1731, Standard Practice for Body Measurement and Sizing of Fire and Rescue Services Uniforms and Other ThermalHazard Protective Clothing, 1996 (2008).

ASTM F 1939, Standard Test Method for Radiant Heat Protective Performance of Flame Resistant Clothing Materials , 2008.

ASTM E 2149, Standard Test Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of Immobilized Antimicrobial Agents Under DynamicContact Conditions, 2010.

ASTM F 2894, Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing and Equipment for Heat Resistance Using aHot Air Circulating Oven , 2012.

C.1.2.3 ISEA Publications.

International Safety Equipment Association, 1901 North Moore Street, Arlington, VA 22209-1762.

ANSI/ISEA 107 , High-Visibility Safety Apparel and Headwear , 2004.

ANSI/ISEA 207 , High-Visibility Public Safety Vests , 2011.

C.1.2.4 ISO Publications. ISEA Publications.

International Organization for Standardization, 1, rue de Varembé, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Geneve 20, Switzerland.



ISO 17493, Clothing and equipment for protection against heat — Test method for convective heat resistance using a hot aircirculating oven, 2000.


1 of 2 6/4/2014 1:23 PM

C.1.2.5 U.S. Government Publications.

U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.

Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 7, Subpart C.

Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1910.1030, 6 March 1992.

Title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 84, Subpart E.

C.2 Informational References. (Reserved)

C.3 References for Extracts in Informational Sections. (Reserved)


2 of 2 6/4/2014 1:23 PM

Public Comment No. 41-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Global Input ]

There are several sections that refer to either odor control or odor resistance. The task group recommends that the optional requirement be referrred to as "odor control". All refernces to odor resistance should be changed to odorcontrol.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Task group has identified several references of "odor control" and "odor resistance". Odor resistance should be changes to odor control for consistency.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jeremy MetzOrganization: West Metro Fire RescueSubmittal Date: Wed Nov 14 18:57:24 EST 2012

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-2-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: There are several sections that refer to either odor control or odor

resistance. The technical committee recommends that the optional requirement be referrred to as "odor-resistant."

Copyright Assignment

I, Jeremy Metz, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement ofProblem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Jeremy Metz, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature

Page 1 of 148National Fire Protection Association Report

3/15/2013http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentParams=%28Comment...


Throughout the document, replace the terms "station/work uniform" and "station/work uniforms" with "work apparel".


This change in terminology aligns the entire document with the title change in FR21. See comment on FR21 to change title. This change increases readability and usability of the document.


Submitter Full Name: Steven CorradoOrganization: UL LLCSubmittal Date: Wed Nov 14 09:34:54 EST 2012

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-3-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: This change in terminology aligns the entire document with the title change

in FR21. See comment on FR21 to change title. This change increases readability and usability of the document.


I, Steven Corrado, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Steven Corrado, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature




Annex B will require revision based on any changes or modifications the technical committee makes to Chapter 7 or 8 of this document. Revisions will need to be made at the public comment meeting.


This comment is to serve as a reminder and placeholder that Annex B will require revision based on any modifications made at the public comment meeting.


Submitter Full Name: Karen LehtonenOrganization: Lion Apparel, Inc.Submittal Date: Fri Nov 16 08:48:40 EST 2012

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-72-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: This comment is to serve as a reminder and placeholder that Annex B will

require revision based on any modifications made at the public comment meeting. See SR 72.


I, Karen Lehtonen, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Karen Lehtonen, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature



Public Comment No. 42-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Section No. 1.1.5 ]

1.1.5 This standard shall also specify optional requirements for flame resistance,moisture management, odor resistance, water resistance, insect repellancy, and visibility markings where such options are specified or claimed to be used in construction of station/work uniforms.


See public comment #40



Committee Statement

Committee Action:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-4-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: The intent of the task group was to establish performance requirements of

fabrics that make claims that the garment controls moisture by various fabric designs or inherent property. Further research has determined that quantifying a moisture management fabric or garment is a complicated matter. Testing apparatus and test methods available to the industry may indicate false positive or negative findings and do not accurately represent or duplicate the implied comfort or moisture management properties of a given garment. NFPA 1975 is a safety standard and should not attempt to quantify claims of moisture management of a manufacturer. The NFPA 1975 task group recommends that all moisture management requirements and inferences be stricken from the document.






Public Comment No. 22-NFPA 1975-2012 [ New Section after 1.2.1.2 ]

1.2.1.3This standard shall also provide optional moisture management requirements and tests to verify the moisture management of textiles where the authority having jurisdiction specifies the use of moisture management textiles for the construction ofstation/ work uniforms, or where the manufacturer represents station/work uniform textiles as having moisture management properties.1.2.1.4This standard shall also provide optional odor control requirements and tests to verify the odor control properties of textiles where the authority having jurisdiction specifies the use of odor control textiles for the construction of station/ work uniforms, or where the manufacturer represents station/work uniform textiles as having odor control properties.1.2.1.5This standard shall also provide optional liquid resistance requirements and tests toverify the liquid resistance of textiles where the authority having jurisdiction specifies the use of liquid resistant textiles for the construction of station/ work uniforms, or where the manufacturer represents station/work uniform textiles as having liquid resistant properties.1.2.1.6This standard shall also provide optional insect repellency requirements and tests to verify the insect repellency of textiles where the authority having jurisdiction specifies the use of insect repellent textiles for the construction of station/ work uniforms, or where the manufacturer represents station/work uniform textiles as having insect repellent properties.


Adds the optional requirements to the Purpose section to maintain consistency within the document.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-5-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Adds the optional requirements to the Purpose section to maintain

consistency within the document. The term "moisture management" is removed and the paragraphs were renumbered.




I, Steven Corrado, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement ofProblem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.





2.3.1 AATCC Publications. American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, P.O. Box 12215, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.


AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic HomeLaundering, 2004 2010 .


AATCC 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties of Textile Fabrics, 2011.


Updates referenced publications to current edition.



Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected but see related SRResolution: SR-46-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Updates referenced publications to current edition.







2.3.1 AATCC Publications. American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, P.O. Box 12215, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.


AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic HomeLaundering, 2004.

AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene:Machine Method, 2005.

AATCC 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties of Textile Fabrics ,2011.


See PC#40



Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected but see related SRResolution: SR-46-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Updates referenced publications to current edition.







2.3.2 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D737 - Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics, 2008 2012 .



ASTM D 3940, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength (Load) andElongation of Sewn Seams of Knit or Woven Stretch Textile Fabrics, 1983(Withdrawn 1995).


ASTM E 2149, Standard Test Method for Determining the AntimicrobialActivity of Immobilized Antimicrobial Agents Under Dynamic ContactConditions, 2010.

ASTM F 2894, Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, ProtectiveClothing and Equipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven, 2011 2012 .





Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-47-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Updates referenced publications to current edition. Also adds new ASTM

test method referenced in the standard.









2.3.2 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM

D737 - Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics ,2008.ASTM

D 751, Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics , 2006.

ASTM D 1683/D 1683M, Standard Test Method for Failure in Sewn Seams of Woven Apparel Fabrics , 2011a.

ASTM D 3940, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength (Load) and Elongation of Sewn Seams of Knit or Woven Stretch Textile Fabrics , 1983 (Withdrawn 1995).ASTM D 6413, Standard Test Method for Flame Resistance of Textiles (Vertical Test) , 2011a.

ASTM E 2149, Standard Test Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of Immobilized Antimicrobial Agents Under Dynamic Contact Conditions , 2010.

ASTM F 2894, Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing and Equipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven , 2011.


See PC #40



Committee Statement

Committee Action:


Resolution: SR-47-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Updates referenced publications to current edition. Also adds new ASTM

test method referenced in the standard.









2.3.4 ISO Publications. International Organization for Standardization, 1, rue de Varembé, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Geneve 20, Switzerland.


ISO/IEC 65, General requirements for bodies operating product certificationsystems, 1996.


ISO 9073-6, Textiles — Test Methods for Nonwoven — Part 6: Absorption, 2001 2003 .

ISO 17011, General requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies, 2004.ISO/IEC 17021, Conformity assessment — Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, 2006.

ISO/IEC 17025, General requirements for the competence of testing andcalibration laboratories, 2005.





Committee Statement

Committee Action: AcceptedResolution: SR-48-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Updates referenced publications to current edition.









3.3.18 Moisture Management Fabric. A fabric that has the properties of wickability, air permeability or breathability, and moisture vapor transfer properties as certified by the performance requirements of this standard.


See PC #40



Committee Statement

Committee Action:

Accepted









3.3.18 Moisture Management Fabric. A fabric that has the properties of wickability, air permeability or breathability , and moisture vapor transfer properties as certified by the performance requirements of this standard.


Per the comment made by Dan Gohlke in the first revision ballot process - in common terms breathability is associated with moisture vapor transport as often as it is associated with air permeability. When the skin breathes it is evaporating water.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The technical committee is deleting this definition since the term is not used in the standard. See SR 6.







3.3.20 Odor Control Resistance . A finish or an inherent property that guards against minimizes the growth ofodors from microbial causes.


The odor control and odor resistance are both used in the optional requirements provided in this standard. Slightly different criteria are provided for both requirements and this difference should be resolved by the technical committee. It appears that the criteria are redundant and that one definition should be used. The use of the term odor resistance is recommended.


Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey StullOrganization: International Personnel Protection, Inc.Submittal Date: Wed Nov 14 22:11:36 EST 2012

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-7-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Odor control and odor resistance are both used in the optional requirements

provided in this standard. Slightly different criteria are provided for both requirements and this difference should be resolved by the technical committee. It appears that the criteria are redundant and that one definition should be used. The use of the term odor-resistant is recommended by the technical committee for consistency throughout the document.


I, Jeffrey Stull, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Jeffrey Stull, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature




3.3.29 Water Resistance. A finish or an inherent property that repels, and prevents the absorption of water and other fluids.


The provided definition is not consistent with the proposed performance criteria associated with this optional requirement. Water resistance should include both repellency and water absorption resistance.


Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey StullOrganization: International Personnel Protection, inc.Submittal Date: Wed Nov 14 21:40:43 EST 2012

Committee Statement

Committee Action: RejectedResolution: See FR 8.







3.3.29 Water Resistance. A finish or an inherent property that repels water and other fluids limits the absoprtion of water .


The water resistance properties are based on a water absoprtion test so it is better described as a limitiation of water absoprtion than water repellence.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-8-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: The water resistance properties are based on a water absoprtion test so it

is better described as a limitiation of water absoprtion than water repellence.






Public Comment No. 82-NFPA 1975-2012 [ New Section after 4.1.3 ]

4.1.3.1 Where station/work uniform garments are manufactured with moisture management textiles, the entire garment shall be certified as compliant with the requirements of Section 7.9, Optional Requirements for Moisture Management Station/Work Uniforms, in addition to all other requirements of this standard.4.1.3.2 Where station/work uniform garments are manufactured with odorcontrol textiles, the entire garment shall be certified as compliant with the requirements of Section 7.10, Optional Requirements for Odor Control Station/Work Uniforms, in addition to all other requirements of this standard.4.1.3.3 Where station/work uniform garments are manufactured with liquid resistant textiles, the entire garment shall be certified as compliant with the requirements of Section 7.11, Optional Requirements for Liquid Resistant Station/Work Uniforms, in addition to all other requirements of this standard.

4.1.3.4 Where station/work uniform garments are manufactured with insect repellent, the entire garment shall be certified as compliant with the requirements of Section 7.12, Optional Requirements for Insect Repellency Station/Work Uniforms, in addition to all other requirements of this standard.4.1.3.5 Where station/work uniform garments are manufactured with visibility markings, the entire garment shall be certified as compliant with the requirements of Section 7.6, Optional Requirements for Visibility Markings, in addition to all other requirements of this standard.


Additional language is being recommended to specify that in addition to the optional requirements all other requirements of the standard need to be met for the options that were added in the first revision. Currently this is only specified for the flame resistant option and should be specified for all options. NOTE: if comment 99 to reformat Chapter 7 then the references in this comment need to be changed as follows 7.5=7.2, 7.9=7.6, 7.8=7.7, 7.11=7.8, 7.12=7.9



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-9-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Additional language is being recommended to specify that in addition to the

optional requirements all other requirements of the standard need to be met for the options that were added in the first revision. Currently this is only specified for the flame resistant option and should be specified for all options. References were updated to reflect changes made to Chapter 7.




I, Karen Lehtonen, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement ofProblem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.





4.1.3 Where station/work uniform garments are manufactured with flame resistant textiles, the entire garment shall be certified as compliant with the requirements of Section 7.5 2 , Optional Requirements for Flame Resistant Station/Work Uniforms, in addition to all other requirements of this standard.


If comment 99 is accepted to reformat chapter 7 this reference change is necessary.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment RelationshipPublic Comment No. 99-NFPA 1975-2012 [Chapter 7]



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-52-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Based on the reformat of chapter 7 this reference change is

necessary.






Public Comment No. 101-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Section No. 4.1.7.2 ]

4.1.7.2 Where station/work uniform garments are certified as compliant with the optional requirements specified in Section 7.5 , Optional Requirements for Flame Resistant Station/Work Uniforms, 2 through 7.9 , in addition to allother requirements of this standard, the product label shall bear the textspecified in 5.1.6.







Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected but see related SRResolution: SR-53-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: The rewrite of chapter 7 requires that this reference change be made.







4.1.7.2 Where station/work uniform garments are certified as compliant with any of the optional requirements specified in Section Sections 7.5 , Optional Requirements for Flame Resistant Station/Work Uniforms, through 7.12 , in addition to all other requirements of this standard, the product label shall bear the appropriate text specified in 5.1.6.


The current draft only specifies additional labeling requirement evaluations for the flame resistant option. The proposed text adds language for labeling evaluations for all options added in the first draft revision.



Committee Statement

Committee Action: RejectedResolution: See SR 53.







4.1.9 The certification organization shall not issue any new certifications to the 2004 the 2009 edition of NFPA 1975, Standard on Station/Work Uniforms for Fire and Emergency Services, on or after the NFPA effective date for NFPA 1975, Standard on Station/Work Uniforms for Emergency Services, 2009 2014 edition, which is 29 December 2008 November 12, 2013 .


Updates administrative dates to reflect current cycle.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-10-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Updates administrative dates to reflect current cycle. Revises title of

2009 edition.







4.1.10 The certification organization shall not permit any manufacturer to continue to label any products that are certified as compliant with the 2004 the 2009 edition of NFPA 1975, Standard on Station/Work Uniforms for Fire and Emergency Services, on or after 30 June 2009 12 November 2013 plus 12months .


Updates administrative dates to reflect current cycle. Allows 12 months for the Certification Organizations to complete certification to the new edition. Corrects title of 2009 edition.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-11-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Updates administrative dates to reflect current cycle. Allows 12 months for

the Certification Organizations to complete certification to the new edition. Also, this SR corrects the title of 2009 edition.







4.1.11 The certification organization shall require manufacturers to remove all certification labels and product labels indicating compliance with the 2004 the 2009 edition of NFPA 1975, Standard on Station/Work Uniforms for Fire and Emergency Services, from all products that are under the control of the manufacturer on 30 June 2009 12 November 2013 plus 12 months , and thecertification organization shall verify that this action is taken.


Updates administrative dates to reflect current cycle.



Committee Statement

Committee Action: AcceptedResolution: SR-12-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Updates administrative dates to reflect current cycle.







5.1.1 Each station/work uniform garment shall have the minimum following compliance statement a product label or labels permanently and conspicously attached to it . (See A.4.1.8 . ) "THIS GARMENT MEETS NFPA 1975 (2013 ED)." . The required label shall be permitted to be printed directly on the compliant product.


Current 5.1.1 text contains standard wording for the label requirement and should not be deleted. Text proposed in FR15 should be moved to 5.1.5 to replace the curren compliance statement. Allows for the option to print the required label information directly onto the product.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-13-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Current 5.1.1 text contains standard wording for the label requirement and

should not be deleted. Text proposed in FR15 should be moved to 5.1.5 to replace the curren compliance statement. Allows for the option to print the required label information directly onto the product.







5.1.5 Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with only the mandatory requirements of this standard, and is not certified with theoptional flame resistance requirements, the following statement shall be printed legibly on the product label. All letters shall be at least 2.5 mm ( 3 ? 32 in.) high.

“THIS GARMENT MEETSTHE REQUIREMENTS OF

NFPA 1975, STANDARD ON STATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES, 2013

-2014 EDITION.

.

THIS GARMENT IS NOT FLAME RESISTANT!



This comment relocates the reduced label text from First Revision No. 23 into 5.1.5. The statement "This garment is not flame resistant" was removed because garments meeting only the mandatory requriement do not meet ANY of the optional requriements (e g moisture management, odor control, etc.).



Committee Statement



CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-16-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: This comment relocates the reduced label text from First Revision No. 23

into 5.1.5. The statement "This garment is not flame resistant" was removed because garments meeting only the mandatory requriement do not meet ANY of the optional requriements (e g moisture management, odor control,etc.).







5.1.6 Station/Work Uniforms, the following statement shall be printed

Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with the mandatory requirements of this standard, and also certified as compliant with one or more of the optional requirements of this standard, the following statement shall be printed legibly on the product label. All letters shall be at least 2.5 mm ( 3 ? 32 in .) high.

“THIS GARMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975,STANDARD ON STATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOR EMERGENCY

SERVICES, 2013 EDITION.

DO NOT REMOVE THIS LABEL!”5.1.6.1

Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with the mandatory requirements of this standard and also certified as compliant with the optional moisture management requirements specified in Section 7.9 , Optional Requirements for Moisture Management

5.1.5 shall be printed legibly on the product label. All letters must be at least 2.5 mm ( 3 ? 32 in) high.“THIS GARMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975, STANDARD ON

STATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES, 2013 EDITION, AND THE OPTIONAL MOISTURE MANAGEMENT TEXTILE REQUIREMENTS OF

NFPA 1975. DO NOT REMOVE THIS LABEL!”5.1.6.2 Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with the mandatory requirements of this standard and also certified as compliant with the optional odor control requirements specified in Section 7.8 , Optional Requirements for Odor Control Station/Work Uniforms, the followingstatement shall be printed on the product label. All letters must be at least 2.5 mm ( 3 ? 32 in) high

“THIS GARMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975, STANDARD ON STATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOR EMERGENCY

SERVICES, 2013 EDITION, AND THE OPTIONAL ODOR CONTROL TEXTILE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975. DO NOT REMOVE THIS

LABEL!”

5.1.6.3 Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with the mandatory requirements of this standard and also certified as compliant with the water penetration resistance requirements specified in Section 7.11 ,Optional Requirements for Liquid Resistant Station/Work Uniforms, the following statement shall be printed on the product label. All letters must be at least 2.5 mm ( 3 ? 32 in) high.




SERVICES, 2013 EDITION, AND THE OPTIONAL WATER RESISTANT TEXTILE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975. DO NOT REMOVE THIS

LABEL!”5.1.6.4

Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with the mandatory requirements of this standard and also certified as compliant with the optional insect repellent requirements specified in Section 7.12 , Optional Requirements for Insect Repellency Station/Work Uniforms, the following statement shall be printed on the product label. All letters must

. The label shall also indicate the applicable optional requirement(s) by either the symbol or statement as identified in Table 5.1.6. Where the symbol is used to identify compliance with the optional requirement(s), the statement shall be included in the user information to explain that symbol. All letters shall be at least 2.5 mm ( 3 ? 32 in . ) high.

“THIS GARMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975, STANDARD ON STATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES, 2013 EDITION,

AND THE OPTIONAL INSECT REPELLENT TEXTILE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975. DO NOT REMOVE THIS LABEL!”

Table 5.1.6.5 Where the station/work uniform is certified as compliant with one or more of the following optional requirements of this standard, a symbol may be printed or applied in close proximity to the compliance statement in 5.1.6 to identify the garment as compliant with the respective optional requirement(s). All letters shall be at least 2 mm ( 1 ? 16 in.) high.Table 5.1.6.5 Label Symbols for

Label Symbols and Statements for Optional Requirements of Station/Work Uniforms

Symbol to be Printed on LabelOptional Requirement

Compliance Statement Symbol

7.5 Optional Requirements for Flame Resistant Station/Work

Uniforms



"THIS GARMENT MEETS THE OPTIONAL FLAME

RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975-2014."

7.9 Optional Requirements for Moisture Management

Station/Work Uniforms

"THIS GARMENT MEETS THE OPTIONAL MOISTURE

MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975

-2014."

7.10 Optional Requirements for Odor Control Station/Work

Uniforms

"THIS GARMENT MEETS THE OPTIONAL ODOR CONTROL

REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975-2014."

7.11 Optional Requirements for Liquid Resistant Station/Work

Uniforms

"THIS GARMENT MEETS

THE OPTIONAL LIQUID RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975-2014."

7.12 Optional Requirements for Insect Repellency

Station/WorkUniforms

"THISGARMENT MEETS

THE OPTIONAL INSECT

REPELLENCY REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975-2014."



Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description ApprovedNFPA_1975_UL_Comment_5.1.6.docx


The labeling requirements identified in the first draft do not reduce labeling text desired by the committee (see committee statement for Log #FR39). This comment allows the use of a symbol or a shortened compliance statement on the label or garment element. Where a symbol is used, it is required that the statement accompany the garment element in the user information. Removed sub-paragraphs to 5.1.6 since these are redundant to the table.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-17-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: The labeling requirements identified in the first draft do not reduce labeling

text desired by the committee. This comment allows the use of a symbol or a shortened compliance statement on the label or garment element. Where a symbol is used, it is required that the statement accompany the garment element in the user information. Removed sub-paragraphs to 5.1.6 since these are redundant to the table. See the attachment for revised text.







5.1.6.1 Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with the mandatory requirements of this standard and also certified as compliant with the optional moisture management requirements specified in Section 7.9 , Optional Requirements for Moisture Management Station/Work Uniforms, the following statement shall be printed on the product label. All letters must be at least 2.5 mm ( 3 ? 32 in) high.


SERVICES, 2013 EDITION, AND THE OPTIONAL MOISTURE MANAGEMENT TEXTILE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975. DO NOT

REMOVE THIS LABEL!”


See PC #40



Committee Statement



I, Jeremy Metz, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.





5.1.6.5 Where the station/work uniform is certified as compliant with one or more of the following optional requirements of this standard, a symbol may be printed or applied in close proximity to the compliance statement in 5.1.6 to identify the garment as compliant with the respective optional requirement(s). All letters shall be at least 2 mm ( 1?16 in.) high.Table 5.1.6.5 Label Symbols for Station/Work Uniforms

Symbol to be Printed on Label Optional Requirement

7.5 Optional Requirements for Flame Resistant Station/Work Uniforms

7.9 Optional Requirements for Moisture Management Station/Work Uniforms

7.10 Optional Requirements for Odor Control Station/Work Uniforms

7.11 Optional Requirements for Liquid Resistant Station/Work Uniforms

7.12 Optional Requirements for Insect RepellencyStation/Work Uniforms


Remove MM marking. Need to update table.



Committee Statement










5.2.1 The product label for the portions of the product label information not specified in 5.1.1 through 5.1.4 shall be permitted to be a hang tag affixed to each station/work uniform or shall be permitted to be printed on a sheet that is inserted and sealed in the packaging that immediately contains the station/work uniform.


This paragraph is a label requirement and not a user information requirement. This statement was deleted because the proposed revisions to 5.1.6 allow for the use of the symbol or the verbiage. The use of the symbol will allow for a sufficient reduction in size of the label to allow for its placement on the product.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-18-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: This paragraph is a label requirement and not a user information

requirement. This statement was deleted because the proposed revisions to 5.1.6 allow for the use of the symbol or the verbiage. The use of the symbol will allow for a sufficient reduction in size of the label to allow for its placement on the product.







6.1.4 Where station/work uniforms are constructed from flame resistant textiles, station/work uniforms shall meet all requirements specified in Section 7.5 2 , Optional Requirements for Flame Resistant Station/Work Uniforms, to be certified as complying with the optional flame resistance requirements.







Committee Statement








6.1.4 Where station/work uniforms are constructed from flame resistant textiles, station/work uniforms shall meet all requirements specified in Sectionintended meet the optional flame resistance properties, the garment shall meet the requirements of Section 7.5, Optional Requirements for Flame Resistant Station/Work Uniforms, to be certified as complying with the optional flame resistance requirements .


The proposed wording clarifies the requirement in that it applies only to those products intended to be sold and marketed as complying with the optional requirements. Addtional changes make wording consistent with other requriements in this section.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-22-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: The paragraph is not design criteria. This criteria is already addressed in

Chapter 7 for performance criteria.







6.1.5 Where station/work uniforms are constructed from flame resistant textiles, the garments shall be stitched with thread of an inherently flame-resistant fiber.


This design requiment is redundant to the Thread Heat Resistance test. If threads meet the performance requirement, the fiber composition should not be relevant. This requirement also prohibits the use of non-inherently flame resistant threads that would be acceptable for these products.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-20-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: This design requiment is redundant to the Thread Heat Resistance test. If

threads meet the performance requirement, the fiber composition should not be relevant. This requirement also prohibits the use of non-inherently flame resistant threads that would be acceptable for these products.







6.1.6 Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with the optional moisture management properties, the garment shall meet the requirements of Section 7.9 6 Optional Requirements for Moisture Management Station/WorkUniforms.







Committee Statement








6.1.6 Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with intended to meet theoptional moisture management properties, the garment shall meet the shall comply with the requirements of Section 7.9 Optional Requirements forMoisture Management Station/Work Uniforms.


The proposed wording clarifies the requirement in that it applies only to those products intended to be sold and marketed as complying with the optional requirements.



Committee Statement








6.1.6 Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with the optional moisture management properties, the garment shall meet the requirements of Section 7.9 Optional Requirements for Moisture Management Station/WorkUniforms.


See PC #40



Committee Statement







Public Comment No. 78-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Sections 6.1.6, 6.1.7, 6.1.8,

6.1.9 ]

Sections 6.1.6, 6.1.7, 6.1.8, 6.1.96.1.6 Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with the optional moisture management properties, the garment shall meet the requirements of Section 7.9 Optional Requirements for Moisture Management Station/WorkUniforms.6.1.7 Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with the optional odor control properties, the garment shall meet the requirements of Section 7.8 OptionalRequirements for Odor Resistant Station/Work Uniforms..6.1.8 Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with the optional water resistance properties, the garment shall meet the requirements of Section 7.11.1 Optional Requirements for Liquid Resistant Station/Work Uniforms.6.1.9 Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with the optional insect repellency, the garment shall meet the requirements of Section 7.12Optional Requirements for Insect Repellancy Station/Work Uniforms.


The proposed paragraphs for deletion are not design criteria. These criteria are already addressed in Chapter 5 for labeling and in Chapter 7 for performance criteria.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-23-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: The proposed paragraphs for deletion are not design criteria. These

criteria are already addressed in Chapter 5 for labeling and in Chapter 7 for performance criteria.









6.1.7 Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with the optional odor control properties, the garment shall meet the requirements of Section 7.8 7Optional Requirements for Odor Resistant Station/Work Uniforms..







Committee Statement








6.1.7 Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with intended to meet theoptional odor control properties, the garment shall meet the comply with requirements of Section 7.8 Optional Requirements for Odor ResistantStation/Work Uniforms..





Committee Statement








6.1.8 Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with the optional water resistance properties, the garment shall meet the requirements of Section 7.11.1 8 Optional Requirements for Liquid Resistant Station/Work Uniforms.







Committee Statement








6.1.8 Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with intended to meet theoptional water resistance properties, the garment shall meet the shall comply with the requirements of Section 7.11.1 Optional Requirements for Liquid Resistant Station/Work Uniforms.





Committee Statement








6.1.9 Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with the optional insect repellency, the garment shall meet the requirements of Section 7.12 9Optional Requirements for Insect Repellancy Station/Work Uniforms.







Committee Statement








6.1.9 Where station/work uniforms are manufactured with intended to meet theoptional insect repellency properties , the garment shall meet the shall comply with the requirements of Section 7.12 Optional Requirements for Insect Repellancy Station/Work Uniforms.


The proposed wording clarifies the requirement in that it applies only to those products intended to be sold and marketed as complying with the optional requirements. Additional changes make requriement consistent with other in this section.



Committee Statement








6.2.1 Station/work uniform garments designed for the upper torso shall be permitted to be configured as follows:


(2) Polo or golf-style shirt, with collar, pullover with partial front opening, either long sleeve or short sleeve

(3) Tee shirt, pullover without front opening, without collar, either long sleeve or short sleeve (See A.1.1.2.)


(5) Jacket, with or without collar, with full front opening and long sleeves.


Section 1.1.2 does not prohibit outerwear. This clarifies the configuration of acceptable outerwear.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-24-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Section 1.1.2 does not prohibit outerwear. This clarifies the configuration

of acceptable outerwear. The technical committee also added additional configurations for tee shirts.








Public Comment No. 99-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Chapter 7 ]

Chapter 7 Performance Requirements 7. 1 Base Requirements for Station Work Uniforms7.1. 1 Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance. (See Section B.1.)7.1.1. 1 Woven and nonwoven textiles, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, and shall not shrink more than 10 percent in any direction.7.1.1. 2 Knits, excluding interlinings shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall not break, and shall not shrink more than 18 percent in any direction..7.1.1. 3 Findings and visibility markings — excluding both emblems and collar stays, elastic, and hook and pile fasteners when placed where they will not come into direct contact with the body — shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite.7.1. 2 Thermal Stability. (See Section B.2)7.1. 2.1 Textiles, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for thermal stability as specified in Section 8.3, Thermal Stability Test, and shall not melt, ignite, or stick to the glass plates and shall have a rating of resistance to blocking of 1 or 2.7.1. 2.2 All thread utilized in the station/work uniform garments shall be tested for heatresistance as specified in Section 8.7, Thread Heat Resistance Test, and shall not melt at or below 260°C (500°F). (See Section B.6.)7.1. 3 Seam Strength. Garment major seams shall be tested for seam strength as specified in Section 8.4, Seam Breaking Strength Test, and shall have a minimum breaking strength of 133 N (30 lb) for either thread or fabric. (See Section B.3.)7.1. 4 Product Label Printing Durability. Product labels shall be tested for printing durability as specified in Section 8.5, Label Print Durability Test, and shall be legible. (See Section B.4.)7.5 2 * Optional Requirements for Flame Resistant Station/Work Uniforms. 7.5 2 .1



Where station/work uniforms are represented as being flame resistant, textiles, excluding interlinings, emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fastener, and closure tape, shall be tested individually for flame resistance as specified in Section 8.6, Flame Resistance Test, and shall have an average char length of not more than 150 mm (6 in.), shall have an average afterflame of not more than 2.0 seconds, and shall not melt or drip. (See Section B.5.)7.5 2 .2 Where station/work uniforms are represented as being flame resistant, visibility markings and small textile items, excluding interlinings, emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fastener, and closure tape, that are not large enough to meet the specimen requirements specified in 8.6.3.1 shall be tested for flame resistance as specified in Section 8.6, Flame Resistance Test, and shall not be totally consumed, shall not have afterflame of more than 2.0 seconds, and shall not melt or drip. (See Section B.5.)7.5 2 .3 Where station/work uniforms are represented as being flame resistant, woven and nonwoven textiles, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, and shall not shrink more than 10 percent in any direction.7.5 2 .4 Where station/work uniforms are represented as being flame resistant, knits, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall not break, and shall not shrink more than 10 percent in any direction.7.6 Optional 3 Optional Requirements for Visibility Markings. 7.6 3 .1 Where visibility markings are used on garments, the visibility markings shall comply with the requirements of 7.1. 2.7.6 3 .2 Where the garment is certified to the optional flame resistance requirement, the visibility markings shall comply with the optional flammability requirements in 7.5. 2.7.7 Optional 4 Optional Requirements for Moisture-Wicking Station/Work Uniforms. Where station/work uniforms are represented as being moisture-wicking, textiles, excluding interlinings and reinforcements, shall be tested for the liquid wicking rate, as specified in Section 8.8, Liquid Wicking Rate Test, and shall have a water rise time of 30 seconds.7.8 Optional 5 Optional Requirements for Odor Resistant Station/Work Uniforms. Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistant properties, textiles shall be tested for the microbial resistance, as specified in Section 8.9, Odor Resistance Effectiveness Test, and shall have a 99.9% reduction of bacteria.7.9 Optional 6 Optional Requirements for Moisture Management Station/Work Uniforms. 7.9 6 .1 Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.10, Liquid Moisture Management Properties, and shall have a minimum Overall Moisture Management Capability (OMMC) grading of 0.8.



7.9 6 .2 Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fastners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.12, Vertical Wicking Test with a minimum wicking rate of 2" in 20 minutes.7.9 6 .3 Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fastners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.13, Air Permeability Test, and shall have a minimum air flow rate of 200 cfm/ft2.7.10 Optional 7 Optional Requirements for Odor Control Station/Work Uniforms. 7.10 7 .1 Where station/work uniforms are represented as being odor control, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.11, Antibacterial Finish Test, and shall have a minimum reduction of 99.0 percent in 24 hours.7.11 Optional 8 Optional Requirements for Liquid Resistant Station/Work Uniforms. 7.11 8 .1 Where station/work uniforms are represented as water resistance textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape shall be tested as specified in Section 8.14 Water Absorption Resistance Test, and shall have a water absorption of 15percent or less.7.12 Optional 9 Optional Requirements for Insect Repellency Station/Work Uniform. 7.12 9 .1 Where station/work uniforms are represented as having insect repellency properties, textiles, excluding interlinings and reinforcements, shall be tested for insect repellency as specified in Section 8.15, and shall have 0.52 percent of permethrin weight/weight ± 10 percent.


Reorganization of Chapter 7 is being proposed to clarify the base requriements for all station/work uniforms in one section (new 7.1) and the optional requirements (new 7.2, 7.3, etc). This will help clarify that all the requirements in 7.1 are required to label station/work uniforms as compliant with NFPA 1975. The remaining sections are identified as optional. If this proposal is accepted changes to references in 4.1.3, 4.1.7.2, 6.1.4, 6.1.6, 6.1.7, 6.1.8, 6.1.9, 8.2.3.1 and A.7.5 will need to be made. Comments to these sections were also made as related to this comment.



Committee Statement



CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-51-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Reorganization of Chapter 7 is being proposed to clarify the base

requirements for all work apparel in one section (new 7.1) and the optional requirements (new 7.2, 7.3, etc). This will help clarify that all the requirements in 7.1 are required to label work apparel as compliant with NFPA 1975. The remaining sections are identified as optional. The revised Chapter 7 is being provided via an attachment.







7.1.2 Knits, excluding interlinings shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall not break, and shall not shrink more than 18 10 percent in any direction..


There are 100% cotton and FR knit fabrics which meet this minimum requirement and are currently certified to this standard, therefore the requirements should not be relaxed to allow other knit fabrics, which shrink more than 10%, to be certified.

Also, there hasn't been any field data or study submitted to the committe which substatiates increasing the shrinkage requirements from 10% to 18%. The TCC has submitted a comment to the technical committee requiring data backed substantiation for changing this requirement.


Submitter Full Name: Kimberly HenryOrganization: PBI Performance Products, Inc.Submittal Date: Fri Nov 16 11:40:52 EST 2012

Committee Statement



I, Kimberly Henry, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Kimberly Henry, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature




7.1.2 Knits, excluding interlinings shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall not break, and shall not shrink more than 18percent in any direction..


Many inherently FR materials will go through physical changes to the molecular structure. This can inhibit the ablility of the fiber to stretch to its original shape and yet still provide heat and FR protection. For instance, an inherently FR filament rayon will began the process of carbonizing at 260C. It will lose its ability to stretch but will provide FR and heat resistant properties to the garment.


Submitter Full Name: Wendy HorowitzOrganization: ICF MercantileSubmittal Date: Fri Nov 16 15:49:13 EST 2012

Committee Statement



I, Wendy Horowitz, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Wendy Horowitz, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature




7.1.2 Knits, excluding interlinings shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall not break, and shall not shrink more than 18 percent in any direction..


The requirement to stretch a knit fabric back to its original size after being exposed to high heat is not realistic and unnecessary to measure the thermal shrinkage. Thermal exposure will likely make the fabric brittle after it cools and will therefore not allow the fabric to be stretched back to its original size if at all. Being able to stretch the fabric has nothing to do with its thermal properties and it should be able to be measured without the need to stretch it back to the original size.


Submitter Full Name: Mark SanerOrganization: Workrite Uniform Company, Inc.Submittal Date: Mon Sep 10 14:19:06 EDT 2012

Committee Statement



I, Mark Saner, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Mark Saner, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature




7.1.2 Knits, excluding interlinings shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall not break, and shall not shrink more than 18 than 10 percent in any direction..


The 18 percent shrinkage requirement for knits was arbitrarily chosen at the First Revision meeting to act as a placeholder. If no data is submitted for review by the technical committee - the requirement should remain at 10 percent.



Committee Statement








7.1.2 Knits, excluding interlinings shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall not break, and shall not shrink more than 18 10 percent in any direction..


The draft standard seperates wovens and nonwovens from knits. Placing a higher level for knits constitutes dual requirements on thermal shrinkage. In addition, high levels of thermal shrinkage constitute a hazard for increased burn injury from conductive heat. The committee thoughts may have been that knits tend to have a higher degree of stretch. This is untrue as a person who worked in knitting mills for a number of years, I have designed knits with virtually no stretch in them. This is accomplished by stitch type and runner lengths. They perform just like a woven in all cases. Therefore seperating knits from wovens and nonwovens isn't correct.


Submitter Full Name: Harry WinerOrganization: HIP Consulting LLCSubmittal Date: Wed Nov 14 15:14:57 EST 2012

Committee Statement



I, Harry Winer, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Harry Winer, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature




7.2.1 Textiles, excluding interlinings and knits intended for base layer garments , shall be tested individually for thermal stability as specified in Section 8.3, Thermal Stability Test, and shall not melt, ignite, or stick to the glass plates and shall have a rating of resistance to blocking of 1 or 2.


When this test requirement was adopted in the fourth edition of the standard it was because flame resistance requirements were removed as a requirement and the concern was that materials like nominally 100% wool fabrics could be used for station wear. The argument was that because of the very nature of emergency services, emergency personnel can be exposed to unknown and unexpected ignition sources during non-emergency situations when primary protective clothing is not being worn. The intent was for station wear and not for base layer garments. This requirement eliminates all but 2 knit materials available on the market today. Base layer requirements should be do no harm. This test exceeds the oven test requirements for primary protective clothing.


Submitter Full Name: Kathleen McNuttOrganization: Globe Manufacturing CoSubmittal Date: Tue Nov 20 10:17:20 EST 2012

Committee Statement



I, Kathleen McNutt, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Kathleen McNutt, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature



Public Comment No. 84-NFPA 1975-2012 [ New Section after 7.3 ]

7.3.1 Seam strength sall be considered acceptable where the fabric strength is less than the required seam strength specified in 7.3, provided the fabric fails without seam failure below the applicable forces specified in 7.3.


In other NFPA standards if the fabric strength is less than the sewn seam strength the seam strength is deemed acceptable. This caveat is being added to this standard for consistency.



Committee Statement








New 7.5.2.1For the purpose of determining whether small textile items are not large enough to meet the specimen requirements in 8.6.3.1, small textile items that are only available in widths less that 75 mm (3.0 in.) shall be excluded from flame resistancetesting.


The criteria for excluding small specimens based on the flame resistance specimen size requirement in 8.6.3.1 (75 mm x 300 mm) is unclear. The proposed language provides instructions based on the available width of the material for making this determination.


Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey StullOrganization: International Personnel Protection, Inc.Submittal Date: Tue Nov 13 22:56:34 EST 2012

Committee Statement








NEW 7.5.2.2Where emblems or other small textile items are applied or affixed to exterior uniform layers and have an overall area that is larger than 22500 mm2 (36 in2), those emblem or small textile items shall be tested for flame resistance in accordance with 8.6, Flame Resistance Test, using the small small specimen test procedures provided in 8.6.11.


In the exclusion of emblems from being subjected to flame resistance testing, the assumption is made that these items are relatively small and do not present a significant hazard. However, it is possible and has been observed that very large emblems can be used on station/work uniforms. A requirement has been proposed to provide a means for making a determination that the emblem is not small and could be a hazard based on the respective total area of a normal flame resistance specimen 22500 mm2 or 36 in2.


Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey StullOrganization: International Personnel Protection, Inc.Submittal Date: Tue Nov 13 22:59:40 EST 2012

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but held

Resolution: The technical committee decided to hold this comment because of the lack of public review for the requirement of emblems to be flame resistant. The committee will continue to review this issue for the next edition.


I, Jeffrey Stull, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement ofProblem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.




Public Comment No. 3-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Sections 7.5.3, 7.5.4 ]

Sections 7.5.3, 7.5.47.5.3 Where station/work uniforms are represented as being flame resistant, woven andnonwoven textiles, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for heatresistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, and shall not shrink more than 10 percent in any direction.7.5.4 Where station/work uniforms are represented as being flame resistant, knits, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified inSection 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall notbreak, and shall not shrink more than 10 percent in any direction.


I don't see any reason to differentiate between wovens and knits, so I am suggesting we combine these two sections and refer to textiles rather than wovens or knits.


Submitter Full Name: Mark SanerOrganization: Workrite Uniform Company, Inc.Submittal Date: Mon Sep 10 14:28:25 EDT 2012

Committee Statement



I, Mark Saner, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Mark Saner, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature




7.5.4 Where station/work uniforms are represented as being flame resistant, knits, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall not break, and shall not shrink more than 10 percent 18% in any direction.


This change would bring the requirements in line with 7.1.2. In addition NPFA 1971 only requires the outershell not to break when exposed to 260C for 5 minutes. As station wear, this garment, when FR, must meet a higher level of testing than the primary protective garment.


Submitter Full Name: Wendy HorowitzOrganization: ICF MercantileSubmittal Date: Fri Nov 16 16:06:06 EST 2012

Committee Statement



I, Wendy Horowitz, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Wendy Horowitz, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature




7.5.4 Where station/work uniforms are represented as being flame resistant, knits, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall not break, and shall not shrink more than 10 18percent in any direction.


Framing eliminates many materials from being considered for base layers. Base layer requirements should be do no harm. Requiring that the material be framed is not necessary. Framing is optional in the AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes in Automatic Home Laundering of Woven and Knit Fabrics. Change thermal shrinkage to replicate FREE Level 1 spec which is 18% and 10% is recognized as being too stringent for knits.



Committee Statement








7.5.4 Where station/work uniforms are represented as being flame resistant, knits, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall not break, and shall not shrink more than 10 percent in any direction.


Many fabrics (knits and woven’s) which have thermal shrinkage less than the required 10% after oven exposure cannot be pulled out to their original dimensions without breaking. This is because thermal shrinkage is generally not recoverable the way that laundry shrinkage is. Some flame resistant fabrics currently on the market today, which easily meet the generally more critical requirements of NFPA 2112 (Standard on Flame Resistant Garments for Protection of Industrial Personnel Against Flash Fire) with excellent after thermal exposure physical properties (tear, tensile strength) may tear if the fabric is forced to its original dimensions after thermal exposure. For example a commercially available 6.5 osy inherently flame resistant knit fabric which is certified to NFPA 2112 gave a 12.3% body burn when tested on the thermal manikin by UL. This is a lower burn injury that obtained when 7.5 osy Nomex twill is tested similarly. However, because this commercially available knit fabric cannot be stretched to its original shape after oven testing and would fail the proposed standard.The use of a fabric stretcher is optional in ASTM F2894 (Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing and Equipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven). The fabric stretcher was developed for stretching knits after laundering. This is because knit fabrics after laundering will relax and recover to their original dimensions if tension is applied uniformly to the fabric for a period of time. Fabrics that shrink thermally generally do not recover due to thermally induced changes the fiber structure.


Submitter Full Name: Charles DunnOrganization: TenCate/Southern MillsAffilliation: TenCate Protective FabricsSubmittal Date: Wed Nov 14 14:02:10 EST 2012

Committee Statement





I, Charles Dunn, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Charles Dunn, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature




7.5.4 Where station/work uniforms are represented as being flame resistant, knits, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2, Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall not break, and shall not shrink more than 10percent in any direction.


First we didn't place in the standard a test method for how we stretch the material out or how we break the material. do I stretch it by hand or use a machine under a given pressure? Second why are we stating this requirement just for knits and not wovens or non wovens. What if I have a knit that was designed with little or no stretch in it, you would not be able to stretch it out since it reacts the same as a woven material. My shrinkage in this case maybe well below 10% but I would fail because the material cannot be stretched. Third shall not break, I'm not sure how to break the fabric we don't state a test method. Does breaking a fabric mean that I have two or more pieces or a whole in the fabric. If the committee was worried about strength of the fabric after oven exposure they should have placed in the test method a tensile or bursting stregth test after heat exposure.


Submitter Full Name: Harry WinerOrganization: HIP Consulting LLCSubmittal Date: Fri Nov 16 11:00:03 EST 2012

Committee Statement







Public Comment No. 24-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Section No. 7.6 ]

7.6 Optional Requirements for Visibility Markings. 7.6.1 Where visibility markings are used on garments, the visibility markings shall comply with the requirements of 7.1.2 .7.6.2 Where the garment is certified to the optional flame resistance requirement, the visibility markings shall comply with the optional flammability requirements in 7.5.2 .


This section is redudant as these requirements are in 7.1.3 and 7.5.2. Additionally, Visibility Markings are not one of the new "Optional Requirements".



Committee Statement








7.6.1 Where visibility markings are used on garments, the visibility markings shall comply with the requirements of 7.1. 2 3 .


Reference correction.



Committee Statement








7.7 Optional Requirements for Moisture-Wicking Station/Work Uniforms. Where station/work uniforms are represented as being moisture-wicking, textiles, excluding interlinings and reinforcements, shall be tested for the liquid wicking rate, as specified in Section 8.8, Liquid Wicking Rate Test, and shall have a minimum water rise time rate of 30 X inches 30 seconds.


Since this test measures the wicking rate of the fabrics, a minimum length in 30 seconds has to be included.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but held

Resolution: The technical committee believes that moisture management needs to be addressed in the next edition of the standard.


I, Kimberly Henry, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement ofProblem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.





7.7 Optional Requirements for Moisture-Wicking Station/Work Uniforms. Where station/work uniforms are represented as being moisture-wicking, textiles, excluding interlinings and reinforcements, shall be tested for the liquid wicking rate, as specified in Section 8.8 , Liquid Wicking Rate Test, and shall have a water rise time of 30 seconds.


This section is redundant to Section 7.9.



Committee Statement










This section should not have been submitted from the first draft meeting and should be deleted. It is duplicate information in 7.9



Committee Statement










The intent of the task group was to establish performance requirements of fabrics that make claims that the garment controls moisture by various fabric designs or inherent property. Further research has determined that quantifying a moisture management fabric or garment is a complicated matter. Testing apparatus and test methods available to the industry may indicate false positive or negative findings and do not accurately represent or duplicate the implied comfort or moisture management properties of a given garment. NFPA 1975 is a safety standard and should not attempt to quantify claims of moisture management of a manufacturer. The NFPA 1975 task group recommends that all moisture management requirements and inferences be stricken from the document.



Committee Statement








7.8 Optional Requirements for Odor Resistant Station/Work Uniforms. Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistant properties, textiles shall be tested for the microbial resistance, as specified in Section 8.9, Odor Resistance Effectiveness Antimicrobial Test, and shall have a 99.9% reduction of bacteria.


Name change more accurately describes the test.


Related Comment RelationshipPublic Comment No. 115-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. 8.9]


Submitter Full Name: Charles DunnOrganization: TenCate/Southern MillsAffilliation: TenCate Protective FabricsSubmittal Date: Fri Nov 16 15:10:09 EST 2012

Committee Statement









Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistant properties, textiles shall be tested for the microbial resistance, as specified in Section 8.9 , Odor Resistance Effectiveness Test, and shall have a 99.9% reduction of bacteria.


This section is redundant to section 7.10.



Committee Statement








7.8 Optional Requirements for Odor Resistant Station/Work Uniforms. Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistant resistance properties, textiles textile fabrics shall be tested for the microbial resistance, as specified in Section 8. 9, Odor Resistance Effectiveness 11,Antimicrobial Finish Test, and shall have a 99.9% reduction of bacteria.


A separate public comment has been provided to remove 8.9 because it is redundant with 8.11. As a result of this change, the reference in this requirement is changed to a test method that is nearly identical.



Committee Statement








7.8 Optional Requirements for Odor Resistant Station/Work Uniforms. 7.8.1 Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistant resistance properties, textiles textile fabrics shall be tested for the microbial resistance, as specified in Section 8.9, Odor Resistance Effectiveness Test, and shall have a 99.9% reduction of bacteria.

7.8.2 Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistance properties, textile fabrics shall be tested for water absorption resistance, as specified in 8.13, Water Absorption Test, and shall have a water absorption of 15% or less.

7.8.3 Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistance properties, textile fabrics shall be tested for water repellency, as specfied in 8.16, Water Repellency Test, and shall have a spray rating of 80 or better.


File Name Description Approved1975_Supplement_to_Stull_Public_Comment_72.docx


The effectiveness of antimicrobial finishes on fabrics is partly dependent on the bioburden present in the fabric, Fabrics that absorb large quantities or liquid or those that do not repel liquids are far more likely not to prevent the the growth of microorganisms that lead to odor and other problems. The need to maintain a low bioburden has been demonstration in research by Margaret P. Cotton, Thomas J. Walsh, and Matthew J. Hardwick, Fabric Challenge Assays: new standards for the evaluation of the performance of textiles treated with antimicrobial agents, at MedStar Health Research Institute and the Weill Cornell University Medical Center.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but held

Resolution: The technical committee decided to hold this comment because further research in water absorption for odor resistant garments is needed. The technical committee will continue to review this issue for the next edition.









7.9 Optional Requirements for Moisture Management Station/Work Uniforms. 7.9.1 Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.10, Liquid Moisture Management Properties, and shall have a minimum Overall Moisture Management Capability (OMMC) grading of 0.8. 7.9.2 Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fastners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.12, Vertical Wicking Test with a minimum wicking rate of 2" in 20 minutes.7.9.3 Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fastners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.13 , Air Permeability Test, and shall have a minimum air flow rate of 200 cfm/ft 2 .


See PC #40



Committee Statement










7.9.1 Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.10, Liquid Moisture Management Properties, and shall have a minimum Overall Moisture Management Capability (OMMC) grading of 0.8.


The representative for the manufacturer of the equipment used in AATCC 195 stated that it was a developmental tool and did not recommend incorporating the results of its testing into a performance standard.



Committee Statement








7.9.3 Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fastners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.13, Air Permeability Test, andshall have a minimum air flow rate of 200 of 40 cfm/ft2.


The air permeability requirement of 200 is excessive for a minimum standard. It will prevent woven fabrics from qualifying for the moisture management option and mean that only knit fabrics can be used in this application. Fabrics with good moisture management properties are very comfortable even without high air permeability. In addition very high air permeability can result in fabrics which do not have acceptable durability due to poor abrasion resistance. Finally moisture management is important for garments used in both hot and cold environments. In the case of cold envronments high air permeability is not desireable while good moisture management is because it keeps the wearer dry.



Committee Statement








7.9.3 Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fastners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.13 , Air Permeability Test, and shall have a minimum air flow rate of 200 cfm/ft 2 .


See PC #40



Committee Statement








7.10 Optional Requirements for Odor Control Station/Work Uniforms. 7.10.1 Where station/work uniforms are represented as being odor control, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.11, Antibacterial Finish Test, and shall have a minimum reduction of 99.0 percent in 24 hours.


This requirement appears to be redundant with the optional requirement provided in 7.9.



Committee Statement








7.10.1 Where station/work uniforms are represented as being odor control, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.11, Antibacterial Finish Test, and shall have a minimum reduction of 99.0 percent in 24 hours 1 hour .


Model test procedure indicates 1 hour test duration to achieve a 99% reduction.



Committee Statement








7.10.1 Where station/work uniforms are represented as being odor control, textiles, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.11, Antibacterial Finish Test, and shall have aminimum reduction of 99.0 percent in 24 hours.


File Name Description ApprovedEPApr2000-1.pdf

EPA public release substantiating that odor control does not require EPA registration


Substantiation that odor control does not need to be regulated or registered with the EPA


Submitter Full Name: Jeremy MetzOrganization: West Metro Fire RescueSubmittal Date: Thu Nov 15 22:01:36 EST 2012

Committee Statement








NEW 7.11.2Where station/work uniforms are represented as having water resistance, textile fabrics, excluding emblems, labels, interlinings, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, shall be tested as specified in 8.16, Water Repellency Test, and shall have a spray rating of 80 or better.


The use of a water absorption test alone is insufficient for characterizing a station/work uniform as water resistance. An industry standard test method has been proposed in a separate comment to address the demonstration of water repellency as part of the proposed optional water resistance requirement.


Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey StullOrganization: International Personnel Protection, IncSubmittal Date: Wed Nov 14 21:50:20 EST 2012

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but held

Resolution: The technical committee decided to hold this comment because further research in water absorption and water resistance requirements is needed. The technical committee will continue to review this issue for the nextedition.







7.11.1 Where station/work uniforms are represented as providing water resistancetextiles , textile fabrics, excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, shall be tested as specified in Section 8.14 Water Absorption Resistance Test, and shall have a water absorption of 15percent 15 percent or less.


The proposed changes are editorial and are intended to clarify the application of the optional requirements.



Committee Statement








Add new section 7.12.2NEW:7.12.2Where station/work uniforms are represented as having insect repellency properties as specified in Section 7.12.1 and are also represented as having flame resistant properties as specified in Section 7.5, textiles, excluding interlinings and reinforcements, shall be individually re-tested (after treatment for insect repellency) for flame resistance as specified in Section 8.6, Flame Resistance Test, and shall have an average char length of not more than 150 mm (6 in.), shall have an average afterflame time of not more than 2.0 seconds, and shall not melt or drip. (see Section B.5)


If applied improperly, the insect repellency treatments can render an FR garment flammable. As such, it is imparative to re-test for flame resistance AFTER the insect repellency is added to a garment that has been designated to be flame resistant.


Submitter Full Name: Brian ShielsOrganization: PBI Performance Products, Inc.Submittal Date: Fri Nov 09 08:54:19 EST 2012

Committee Statement



I, Brian Shiels, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Brian Shiels, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature




8.2.1.4 Modifications to this test method for testing knits shall be as specified in 8.2.10.


There are specific requirements for testing knits but there is no reference to these modifications in the application section.



Committee Statement








8.2.3.1 Heat resistance testing only shall be conducted on a minimum of three specimens for each finding not excluded in 7.1.1. 3.







Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected but see related SRResolution: SR-67-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Based on revisions to Chapter 7 this reference change is necessary.






Public Comment No. 111-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Sections 8.2.4, 8.2.5 ]

Sections 8.2.4, 8.2.58.2.4 Apparatus. The test oven shall be as specified in ASTM F 2894 ISO 17493 , StandardTest Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing and Equipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven .8.2.5 Procedure. Testing shall be performed in accordance withASTM F 2894 with ISO 17493 ,Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing andEquipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven , using thefollowing parameters:

(1) Procedure 7.1 in ISO 17493 for flat textile and other sheet materials shall be used.


(3) The optional stretching frame shall be used to evaluate knit materials Specimen marking and measurements shall be conducted in accordance with the procedure specified in AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes in Automatic Home Laundering of Woven and Knit fabrics .


Keep the ISO method which is currently used in NFPA 1975, 2009 edition. The ASTM method includes a stretching frame as an otption, and none of the interlab studies required testing using the stretching frame, therefore the ASTM test has not been vetted using the proposed current text.

The current ISO method requires a stretching frame so no need to change to the ASTM version. We have seen recently that changing an NFPA test method automatically to an ASTM method does not always translate as expected or correlate well with the results generated by the NFPA method.



Committee Statement





I, Kimberly Henry, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.





8.2.5 Procedure. Testing shall be performed in accordance withASTM F 2894, Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing and Equipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven , using the following parameters:


(2) The optional stretching frame shall be used to evaluate knit materials.


Framing eliminates many materials from being considered for base layers. Base layer requirements should be do no harm. Requiring that the material be framed is not necessary. Framing is optional in the AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes in Automatic Home Laundering of Woven and Knit Fabrics.



Committee Statement










(2) The optional stretching frame shall may be used to evaluate knit materials fabrics per the manufacuters instructions .


The stretching frame test should not be required to be used for the percentage stretching test. This test is normally used to evaluate shrinkage from repeat laundering and is not necessarily intended to be used effectively for thermal shrinkage. The task group recommends that the stretching frame be a optional test, specified by submitting manufacturer.



Committee Statement










(2) The optional stretching frame shall be used to evaluate knit materials.

(3)


Section 8.2 or ASTM F-2894 does not reference a stretcher frame or how to operate the stretcher frame. So to state that you should use this stretcher frame is incomplete and should be deleted from the text. You would need to reference a particular frame and method of operation.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-26-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Use of the stretching frame is optional in the ASTM method. The technical

committee is clarifying text to specify how the stretching frame is to be used.







8.2.8 Specific Requirements for Testing Woven and Nonwoven Testing Textiles. 8.2.8.1 Each specimen shall be 380 mm × 380 mm, ±13 mm (15 in. × 15 in., ± 1?2 in.).8.2.8.2 Testing shall be performed as specified in 8.2.2 through 8.2.7.


Editorial correction.



Committee Statement








8.2.10.3 Observations of ignition, melting, dripping, separation, breaking, or inability to be stretched to the original dimensions for each specimen shall be recorded and reported.


First I do not have a definition of breaking, There is no test method in 8.2 to tell me how to break the specimen. I assume the committee was interested in the fabic if it broke open on this imaginary stretch frame that was mentioned above.Knits shouldn't be individually singled out to be stretched back to its original dimensions, if this is what the committee wants then it should apply to all materials, since I can design knits to react the same as wovens.



Committee Statement








8.2.10.4 Any evidence of ignition, melting, dripping, separation, breaking, or inability to be stretched to the original dimensions shall constitute failing performance.


See substantiation on public comment 104



Committee Statement








8.2.10.4 Any evidence of ignition, melting, dripping, separation, breaking , or inability to be stretched to the original dimensions shall constitute failing performance.


Many fabrics (knits and woven’s) which have thermal shrinkage less than the required 10% after oven exposure cannot be pulled out to their original dimensions without breaking. This is because thermal shrinkage is generally not recoverable the way that laundry shrinkage is. Some flame resistant fabrics currently on the market today, which easily meet the generally more critical requirements of NFPA 2112 (Standard on Flame Resistant Garments for Protection of Industrial Personnel Against Flash Fire) with excellent after thermal exposure physical properties (tear, tensile strength) may tear if the fabric is forced to its original dimensions after thermal exposure. For example a commercially available 6.5 osy inherently flame resistant knit fabric which is certified to NFPA 2112 gave a 12.3% body burn when tested on the thermal manikin by UL. This is a lower burn injury that obtained when 7.5 osy Nomex twill is tested similarly. However, because this commercially available knit fabric cannot be stretched to its original shape after oven testing and would fail the proposed standard.The use of a fabric stretcher is optional in ASTM F2894 (Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing and Equipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven). The fabric stretcher was developed for stretching knits after laundering. This is because knit fabrics after laundering will relax and recover to their original dimensions if tension is applied uniformly to the fabric for a period of time. Fabrics that shrink thermally generally do not recover due to thermally induced changes the fiber structure.


Related Comment RelationshipPublic Comment No. 30-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. 7.5.4]



Committee Statement










8.3.1 Application. This test method shall apply to textiles excluding knits intended for base layergarments .


Base layer requirements should be do no harm. The oven temperature is 265 ?C or 510 ?F for a 6 hour exposure. This test exceeds the oven test requirements for even primary protective clothing.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but held

Resolution: The technical committee is not addressing the concept of layering in this revision, but will consider this issue for future revisions of the standard when further data is available.







8.3.4.1 The test oven shall be as specified in ISO 17493, ASTM F 2894, Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing and equipment for protection against heat — Test method for convective heat resistance using a hot air circulating oven Equipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven .


Replaces the ISO standard with the ASTM standard to be consistent with Section 8.2.4.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-27-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Replaces the ISO standard with the ASTM standard to be consistent

with Section 8.2.4.







8.3.4.1 The test oven shall be as specified in ISO 17493, Clothing and equipment forprotection against heat — Test method for convective heat resistance using a hot air circulating oven ASTM F 2894, Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing and Equipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven .


The proposed change in the test method reference harmonizes the standard used for specifying the test oven with the heat and thermal shrinkage test requirement.



Committee Statement








8.3.5 Procedure. Specimens shall be tested according to ASTM D 751, Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics, using the Procedures for Blocking Resistance at ElevatedTemperatures, specified in Sections 84 through 88, with the followingmodifications:




(4) In removing specimens from the glass plates, the rating of resistance to blocking shall be determined and observations shall be made whether each specimen sticks to the glass plates or shows evidence of melting or ignition. A determination of a specimen sticking to the glass plates shall be made by placing the glass plate and specimen surface on a flat level surface and raising the top glass plate slowly with the plate parallel to the surface and observing if the material falls away from the plate. If the material stays attached to the surface after being raised for 30 seconds, then the specimen shall be considered as having stuck the glass plate.

(5) Where the specimen size is such that a 102 mm × 102 mm (4 in. × 4 in.) square cannot be achieved, three specimens shall be tested folded face to face, and three specimens shall be tested folded back to back.


No specific procedures are provided for making a determination of whether the specimens sticks to the glass plate. The provided instruction is intended to clarify how this determination is made.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-66-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: No specific procedures are provided for making a determination of whether

the specimens stick to the glass plate. The provided instruction is intended to clarify how this determination is made.









8.4.4.2 All knit seam assemblies shall be tested in accordance with ASTM D 3940, 3787 Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength (Load) and Elongation of Sewn Seams of Knit and Woven Stretch Textile Fabrics Brusting Strength of Textiles - Constant -Rate - of - Traverse (CRT) Ball Burst Test .


ASTM D 3940 was withdrawn from ASTM in 1995. The last version of this standard is from1983. If this test method is to be used the test method should be inserted into NFPA 1975 in its entirety. However ASTM D 3787 is a current standard and appears to be virtually identical to ASTM D 3940 except that the sample size needs to be changed from the 5" by 5" dimension specified in ASTM 3787 to 3" by 4" dimension used in ASTM D3940. The provision also have to be made to pad the clamps to prevent fabric slippage due to the thickness of the seam.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-28-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: ASTM D 3940 was withdrawn from ASTM in 1995. The last version of this

standard is from 1983. However ASTM D 6797 is a current standard and appears to be virtually identical to ASTM D 3940. The provision also has to be made to allow for padding of the clamps to prevent fabric slippage due to the thickness of the seam.







8.4.4.3

Evaluation for sewn seam strength in accordance with Section 11.1 of ASTM D 1683, Standard Test Method for Failure in Sewn Seams of Woven Fabrics, shall be used to determine pass/fail performance.


Performing the test in accordance with ASTM D1683 would include the caluclation of the seam strength. Therefore, this statement is redudant.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-29-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Performing the test in accordance with ASTM D1683 would include the

caluclation of the seam strength. Therefore, this statement is redudant.







8.4.5.3 The type of seams tested shall be reported as to whether the specimens were cut from the finished garment or prepared from fabric samples.


This reporting language is specified in other NFPA clothing standards related to seam strength testing; text is being added here for consistency.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-55-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: This reporting language is specified in other NFPA protective clothing and

equipment standards related to seam strength testing. That text is being added here for consistency.







8.8 Liquid Wicking Rate Test. 8.8.1 Application. This test method shall apply to the primary textiles used in the construction of the station/work uniform.8.8.2 Samples. 8.8.2.1 Samples for preconditioning shall be a 1 m (1 yd) square of textile. 8.8.2.2 Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3 .8.8.2.3 Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be dry cleaned, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.4 .8.8.3 Specimens. A minimum of three specimens shall be tested.8.8.4 Apparatus. The test set-up shall be as specified in ISO 9073-6, Textiles —Test Methods for Nonwoven—Part 6: Absorption.8.8.5 Procedure. Testing shall be conducted in accordance with the liquid wicking rate procedures of ISO 9073-6, Textiles—Test Methods for Nonwoven—Part 6: Absorption.8.8.6 Report. The time for water to rise 25 mm (1 in.) for each individual specimen and the overall average for all specimens shall be recorded and reported.8.8.7 Interpretation. Pass/fail determination shall be based on the average reported time for water rise for all specimens tested.


See PC #40



Committee Statement



Committee Action:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-30-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: A task group of the technical committee was established to identify

performance requirements of fabrics that make claims that the garment controls moisture by various fabric designs or inherent property. Further research has determined that quantifying a moisture management fabric or garment is a complicated matter. Testing apparatus and test methods available to the industry may indicate false positive or negative findings and do not accurately represent or duplicate the implied comfort or moisture management properties of a given garment. NFPA 1975 is a safety standard and should not attempt to quantify claims of moisture management of a manufacturer. The technical committee recommends that all moisture management requirements and inferences be stricken from the document.







8.8.6 Report. The time for water to rise 25 20 mm (1 0.8 in.) for each individual specimen and the overall average for all specimens shall be recorded and reported.


More appropriate wicking distance for optional moisture management fabrics.



Committee Statement








8.9 Odor Resistance Effectiveness 9 Antimicrobial Test. 8.9.1 Application. This test method shall apply to textiles.8.9.2 Samples. 8.9.2.1 Samples for preconditioning shall be a 1 m (1 yd) square of textile.8.9.2.2 Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3.8.9.2.3 Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be dry cleaned, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.4.8.9.3 Specimens. A minimum of three specimens shall be tested.8.9.4 Apparatus. The test set-up shall be as specified in AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials, Assessment of.8.9.5 Procedure. Testing shall be conducted in accordance with AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials, Assessment of, using both Staphyloccoccusaureus and Klebsiella pneumonia.8.9.6 Report. The percent reduction of bacteria for each specimen shall be recorded and reported.8.9.7 Interpretation. Pass/fail determination shall be based on the average percent reduction for all specimens tested for each type of bacteria tested. Failing performance for one type of bacteria shall constitute failure of the textile.


Name change more accurately describes test and is linked to the test method described in the section.


Submitter Full Name: Charles DunnOrganization: TenCate/Southern MillsAffilliation: Tencate Protective FabricsSubmittal Date: Fri Nov 16 15:07:02 EST 2012

Committee Statement










8.9 Odor Resistance Effectiveness Test. 8.9.1 Application. This test method shall apply to textiles.8.9.2 Samples. 8.9.2.1 Samples for preconditioning shall be a 1 m (1 yd) square of textile. 8.9.2.2 Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3 .8.9.2.3 Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be dry cleaned, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.4 .8.9.3 Specimens. A minimum of three specimens shall be tested.8.9.4 Apparatus. The test set-up shall be as specified in AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials, Assessment of.8.9.5 Procedure. Testing shall be conducted in accordance with AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials, Assessment of, using both Staphyloccoccusaureus and Klebsiella pneumonia .8.9.6 Report. The percent reduction of bacteria for each specimen shall be recorded and reported.8.9.7 Interpretation. Pass/fail determination shall be based on the average percent reduction for all specimens tested for each type of bacteria tested. Failing performance for one type of bacteria shall constitute failure of the textile.


The Odor Resistance Test and the Antimicrobial Finish Test are identical except that the latter test method also references ASTM E 2149. The Antimicrobial Finish Test in 8.11 appears to be more complete.



Committee Statement



CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-31-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: The Odor Resistance Test and the Antimicrobial Finish Test are identical

except that the latter test method also references ASTM E 2149. The Antimicrobial Finish Test in 8.11 appears to be more complete.






Public Comment No. 75-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Sections 8.9, 8.10 ]

Sections 8.9, 8.108.9 Odor Resistance Effectiveness Test. 8.9.1 Application. This test method shall apply to textiles.8.9.2 Samples. 8.9.2.1 Samples for preconditioning shall be a 1 m (1 yd) square of textile. 8.9.2.2 Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3.8.9.2.3 Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be dry cleaned, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.4.8.9.3 Specimens. A minimum of three specimens shall be tested.8.9.4 Apparatus. The test set-up shall be as specified in AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials, Assessment of.8.9.5 Procedure. Testing shall be conducted in accordance with AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials, Assessment of, using both Staphyloccoccus aureus and Klebsiella pneumonia.8.9.6 Report. The percent reduction of bacteria for each specimen shall be recorded andreported.8.9.7 Interpretation. Pass/fail determination shall be based on the average percent reduction for all specimens tested for each type of bacteria tested. Failing performance for one type of bacteria shall constitute failure of the textile.8.10 Liquid Moisture Management Properties. 8.10.1 Application. This test method shall apply to textiles identified as moisture management fabrics8.10.2 Samples. 8.10.2.1 Samples for conditioning shall be 1 m (1 yd) square of each textile material.8.10.2.2 Samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3 (25 Wash/Dry). 8.10.3 Apparatus. The apparatus shall be as specified in AATCC 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties of Textile Fabrics.8.10.4 Procedure. Testing shall be performed in accordance with AATCC 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties of Textile Fabrics.8.10.5 Report. 8.10.5.1



The Overall Moisture Management Capability (OMMC) shall be reported for eachspecimen.8.10.5.2 The average OMMC shall be reported for all specimens.8.10.6 Interpretation. The average OMMC shall be used to determine pass/fail.


File Name Description Approved

NFPA_1975_Antibacterial_test.docx Proposed changes to antibacterial odor control test


Clarification of percent reduction in test substance and test method clarification



Committee Statement

Committee Action: RejectedResolution: See SR 31 and SR 32.







8.10 Liquid Moisture Management Properties. 8.10.1 Application. This test method shall apply to textiles identified as moisture management fabrics8.10.2 Samples. 8.10.2.1 Samples for conditioning shall be 1 m (1 yd) square of each textile material.8.10.2.2 Samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3 (25 Wash/Dry). 8.10.3 Apparatus. The apparatus shall be as specified in AATCC 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties of Textile Fabrics.8.10.4 Procedure. Testing shall be performed in accordance with AATCC 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties of Textile Fabrics.8.10.5 Report. 8.10.5.1 The Overall Moisture Management Capability (OMMC) shall be reported for each specimen.8.10.5.2 The average OMMC shall be reported for all specimens.8.10.6 Interpretation. The average OMMC shall be used to determine pass/fail.


The representative for the manufacturer of the equipment used in AATCC 195 stated that it was a developmental tool and did not recommend incorporating the results of its testing into a performance standard.


Related Comment RelationshipPublic Comment No. 36-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. 7.9.1]



Committee Statement



CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-32-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: The representative for the manufacturer of the equipment used in AATCC

195 stated that it was a developmental tool and did not recommend incorporating the results of its testing into a performance standard.


I, Charles Dunn, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement ofProblem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.





8.10 Liquid Moisture Management Properties. 8.10.1 Application. This test method shall apply to textiles identified as moisture management fabrics8.10.2 Samples. 8.10.2.1 Samples for conditioning shall be 1 m (1 yd) square of each textile material.8.10.2.2 Samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3 (25 Wash/Dry). 8.10.3 Apparatus. The apparatus shall be as specified in AATCC 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties of Textile Fabrics.8.10.4 Procedure. Testing shall be performed in accordance with AATCC 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties of Textile Fabrics.8.10.5 Report. 8.10.5.1 The Overall Moisture Management Capability (OMMC) shall be reported for each specimen.8.10.5.2 The average OMMC shall be reported for all specimens.8.10.6 Interpretation. The average OMMC shall be used to determine pass/fail.


See PC #40



Committee Statement










8.12.1.1 This test method shall apply to optional moisture management garment textiles.


See PC #40



Committee Statement








8.13.1.1 This test method shall apply to optional moisture management garment textiles.


See PC #40



Committee Statement








8.14.2.2 If the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3. 2 1 .


Current water repellant finishes will not achieve the required level of water absorption after 100 launderings. I believe that the committee wanted to evaluate water absorption after 25 launderings which is consistant with the preconditioning of other optional requirements such as Odor Control.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-35-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Current water repellant finishes will not achieve the required level of water

absorption after 100 launderings. The technical committee wanted to evaluate water absorption after 25 launderings which is consistent with the preconditioning of other optional requirements such as Odor Control.


I, Charles Dunn, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement ofProblem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.





8.15 Optional Insect Repellency Test. Reserved. (See Garment Specification for Trouser, Army Combat Uniform, GL-PD 07-14C, Evaluation of Permethrin Treated Fabric Materials: Extraction and Analysis by GasChromatography-Mass Spectrometry.)


File Name Description ApprovedPermethrin_Test_Method_Permethrin_Content-Army.pdf

test method for insect repellency


Adding the insect repellency test procedures.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-59-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: The technical committee is providing the insect repellency test

procedures per the referenced method.






Public Comment No. 89-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Section No. A.1.1.2 ]

A.1.1.2 Station/work uniform garments are made from thermally stable materials. Garments such as fitness clothing and underclothing might not be made from thermally stable materials and should not be worn while on duty. Such non-thermally stable garments are made from fibers with relatively low melting points and can contribute to burn injury. These types of performance fitness clothing should also not be worn as undergarments beneath the station/workuniform.


Clarifies the existing text and utilizes some of the text that was deleted from A.6.1.2 in FR25.

Related Items from the Public Input Stage for This Document

Related ItemFirst Revision No. 3-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. A.6.1.2]



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-36-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Clarifies the existing text and utilizes some of the text that was deleted

from A.6.1.2 in FR 25.






Public Comment No. 58-NFPA 1975-2012 [ New Section after A.1.1.6 ]

Moisture Mangement garmentsUsers are encouraged to conduct a wear trial and develop user findings and recomendations when dealing with work clothing elements that make claims to provide moisture management. Moisture management clothing may also be described as wicking, active transport, or similar descriptive terms that imply the comfort to the wearer and moving sweat away from the body. The authority having jurisdiction should be aware that it may be difficult to objectively quantify findings or such claims. User perception of comfort should be considered over such claims of moisture management.


Since moisture management is recommended to be deleted from the document, this will serve to provide a user evaluation statement to evaluate claims of moisture management properties at the organization or user level.



Committee Statement







Public Comment No. 90-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Section No. A.3.3.9 ]

A.3.3.9 Flame Resistance (Protective Apparel) . Flame resistance can be an inherent property of the textile material, or it can be imparted by specific treatment.


The text in parenthesis does not appear in the term in the body of the standard thus should not appear in the Annex, this was incorrectly captured in the first revision and fixes the editorial error.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-38-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: The text in parenthesis does not appear in the term in the body of the

standard thus should not appear in the Annex, this was incorrectly captured in the first revision and fixes the editorial error.






Public Comment No. 91-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Section No. A.5.2.7(3) ]

A.5.2.7(3) To avoid possible damage to the garment and possible reduction and loss of inherent or treated flame resistance characteristics of the garment, the manufacturer should be contacted prior to disinfecting or cleaning the garment by a method not prescribed on the product. Station/work uniforms should not be cleaned in home washing machines. See 5.1.7 and 5and 5 .2. 6 7 for information regarding how to identify the manufacturer and the garment.

For information on the prevention and transmission of communicable diseases and carcinogens caused by contaminated garments, see NFPA 1581, Standard on Fire Department Infection Control Program, and OSHA regulation 29 CFR 1910.1030, or consult the Centers for Disease Control, the local board of public health, the American Medical Association, the U.S. Fire Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, or the International Association of Fire Fighters.


Reference correction.



Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected but see related SRResolution: SR-39-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Reference correction and terminology change.






Public Comment No. 60-NFPA 1975-2012 [ New Section after A.7.5 ]

A7.12 Insect repellencyIt is important that users understand that insect repellency is a finish that is applied to the finished garment and that performance or bite protection is likely to decline over time and after repeat launderings.


Add explanatory information about the decrease of bite protection after repeat laundering and use.



Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-58-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Add explanatory information about the decrease of bite protection after

repeat laundering and use. Change






Public Comment No. 92-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Section No. A.7.5 ]

A.7.5 Two separate test requirements are provided for manufacturers who wish to claim use of flame resistant textile fabrics in their manufacture of station/work uniforms. When the requirements found in 7.2.2, 7.5.1, and through 7.5. 2 are 4 are met, additional label language is used to indicate that the garments are flame resistant.


Reference correction.If comment 99 to reorganize chapter 7 is accepted the following revisions need to be made to this comment:7.2.2 changes to 7.1.27.5.1 through 7.5.4 changes to 7.2.5.1 through 7.2.5.4





Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: SR-57-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Reference correction to reflect changes made to Chapter 7. The new

Annex item A.7.4 clarifies the use of the water resistance test and what it is intended to represent in this revision of the document.






Public Comment No. 93-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Section No. B.2.1 ]

B.2.1 Test Method Cited. The test method appears in Section 8.3, Method 1 . A modified form of ASTM D 751, Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics, is used. . Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, (Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V, Drying Procedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene:Machine Method.


Editorial corrections of revisions made in first revision draft.

Related Items from the Public Input Stage for This Document

Related ItemFirst Revision No. 61-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. B.6]



Committee Statement

Committee Action: AcceptedResolution: SR-40-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: Editorial corrections of revisions made in first revision draft.






Public Comment No. 95-NFPA 1975-2012 [ New Section after B.3.1 ]

B.3.3 Application of Test MethodThe purpose of the test is to require a minimum seam strength of 133N (33 lbs) for seams used in stress areas of the garment.


No application of this test method has been provided which is inconsistent with the other test methods described in Annex B.



Committee Statement







Public Comment No. 52-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Section No. B.7 ]

B.7 Optional Moisture Management. B.7.1 The test method appears in Section 8.10; AATCC Test Method 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties of Textile Fabrics, is used. Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135 , Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, -(Machine Cycle 1, WashTemperature V, Drying Procedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method . B.7.2 Description of Test Method. The liquid moisture management properties of a textile are evaluated by placing a fabric specimen between two horizontal (upper and lower) electrical sensors each with seven concentric pins. A predetermined amount of test solution that aids the measurement of electrical conductivity changes are dropped onto the center of the upward-facing test specimen surface. The test solution is free to move in three directions: radial spreading on the top surface, movement through the specimen from top surface to the bottom surface, and radial spreading on the bottom surface of the specimen. During the test, changes in electrical resistance of specimen are measured andrecorded. The electrical resistance readings are used to calculate fabric liquidmoisture content changes that quantify dynamic liquid moisture transportbehaviors in multiple directions of the specimen. The summary of the measured results are used to grade the liquid moisture management properties of a fabric by using predetermined indices.B.7.3 Application of Test Method. The purpose of this test is for the measurement, evaluation, and classification of liquid moisture management properties of textile fabrics. The test method produces objective measurements of liquid moisture management properties of knitted, woven, and nonwoven textile fabrics. The results obtained with this test method are based on water resistance, waterrepellency, and water absorption characteristics of the fabric structure,including the fabric's geometric and internal structure and the wickingcharacteristics of its fibers and yarns. The overall (liquid) moisturemanagement capability (OMMC) is an index of the overall capability of a fabric to transport liquid moisture as calculated by combining three measuredattributes of performance: the liquid moisture absorption rate on the bottomsurface (ARB), the one-way liquid transport capability (R), and the maximumliquid moisture spreading speed on the bottom surface (SSB).


See PC #40





Committee Statement

Committee Action:

Accepted








Public Comment No. 64-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Section No. B.9 ]

B.9 Optional Air Permeability. B.9.1 Test Method Cited. The test method appears in Section 8.13, ASTM D 737, Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics is used. Conditioning is bylaundering per AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, (Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V, Drying Procedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method . B.9.2 Description of Test Method. Material specimens are evaluated after 25 wash/dry cycles or dry-cleaning cycles, whichever practice is specified for the material. The material is placed in the test device, and the rate of airflow passing perpendicularly through a known area of fabric is measured. From the rate of airflow, air permeability isdetermined.B.9.3 Application of Test Method. This test is used to quantify the air permeability properties of the fabric.


See PC #40



Committee Statement

Committee Action:

Accepted










Public Comment No. 53-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Section No. C.1.2.1 ]

C.1.2.1 AATCC Publications. American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, P.O. Box 12215, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.


AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic HomeLaundering, 2004.

AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene:Machine Method, 2005.

AATCC 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties of Textile Fabrics ,2011.


See PC #40



Committee Statement

Committee Action:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-44-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: A task group established by the technical committee was asked to establish

performance requirements of fabrics that make claims that the garment controls moisture by various fabric designs or inherent property. Further research has determined that quantifying a moisture management fabric or garment is a complicated matter. Testing apparatus and test methods available to the industry may indicate false positive or negative findings and do not accurately represent or duplicate the implied comfort or moisture management properties of a given garment. NFPA 1975 is a safety standard and should not attempt to quantify claims of moisture management of a manufacturer. The technical committee therefore recommends that all moisture management requirements and references be stricken from thedocument.








Public Comment No. 65-NFPA 1975-2012 [ Section No. C.1.2.2 ]

C.1.2.2 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D

737, Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics , 2008



ASTM D 3940, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength (Load) andElongation of Sewn Seams of Knit or Woven Stretch Textile Fabrics, 1983(withdrawn 1995).

ASTM D 6413, Flame Resistance of Textiles (Vertical Test), 2011a.ASTM F 1731, Standard Practice for Body Measurement and Sizing of Fire and Rescue Services Uniforms and Other Thermal Hazard Protective Clothing, 1996 (2008).

ASTM F 1939, Standard Test Method for Radiant Heat Protective Performance of Flame Resistant Clothing Materials, 2008.

ASTM E 2149, Standard Test Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of Immobilized Antimicrobial Agents Under Dynamic Contact Conditions, 2010.

ASTM F 2894, Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing and Equipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven, 2012.


See PC #40



Committee Statement

Committee Action:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-45-NFPA 1975-2013Statement: References were revised, deleted, updated or added to Annex C to

comply with references found elsewhere in the Annexes.








Second Revision No. 2-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Global Input ]

There are several sections that refer to either odor control or odor resistance. The technicalcommittee recommends that the optional requirement be referrred to as "odor-resistant."


Submitter Full Name: [ Not Specified ]

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Tue Jan 15 10:26:49 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

There are several sections that refer to either odor control or odor resistance. The technicalcommittee recommends that the optional requirement be referrred to as "odor-resistant."

ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 41-NFPA 1975-2012 [Global Input]

Ballot Results

This item has passed ballot

24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All

0 Affirmative with Comments

0 Negative with Comments

0 Abstention

Not ReturnedByrne, Collin M.

Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.

Affirmative AllAllen, Jason L.

Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

1 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.

Geraghty, Stephen J.

Haskell, III, William E.

Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve

Krause, II, George R.

Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean

Stephenson, R. Douglas


2 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


Throughout the document, replace the terms "station/work uniform" and "station/work uniforms"with "work apparel".





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This change in terminology aligns the entire document with the title change in FR21. Seecomment on FR21 to change title. This change increases readability and usability of thedocument.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.


3 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean


Affirmative with CommentLehtonen, Karen E.

#1. The reference to Station/Work Uniform in Section 3.3.11 was not updated. 3.3.11 should read "See 3.3.28Work Apparel Garment. #2. Visibility Markings are not addressed as optional requirements in this standard. Thewords "and visibility markings" should be deleted in this section.


4 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


Annex B will require revision based on any changes or modifications the technical committeemakes to Chapter 7 or 8 of this document. Revisions will need to be made at the public commentmeeting.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This comment is to serve as a reminder and placeholder that Annex B will require revisionbased on any modifications made at the public comment meeting. See SR 72.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.


5 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



6 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Correlating Revision No. 6-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Section No. 1.1.4 ]

1.1.4


This standard shall also specify optional requirements for flame resistance, moisture management, odorresistance, water resistance, and insect repellancy, and visibility markings where such options arespecified or claimed to be used in construction of station/ work apparel uniforms .


Submitter Full Name: David Trebisacci

Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc

Street Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Tue May 14 08:34:17 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee is correcting an error under its authority as specified in paragraph3.4.2 of the Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards. Visibility markings arenot addressed as optional requirements in this standard.

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

10 Not Returned

17 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not ReturnedBarker, Roger L.

Beck, Eric J.

Duffy, Richard M.

Fargo, Cristine Z.

Johnson, James S.

Legendre, Jeff

Neilson, Gary L.

Putorti, Jr., Anthony D.

Reall, Jack E.

Tomlinson, Tim W.



7 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Freese, Robert A.

Gulledge, Beverly F.


Haston, David V.

Hosea, Thomas M.

Lehtonen, Karen E.

Matthews, David G.

McKenna, Michael F.

Sanders, Stephen R.

Stull, Jeffrey O.

Van Lent, William A.

Varner, Bruce H.

Winer, Harry P.

Young, Richard H.


8 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 4-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Section No. 1.1.5 ]

1.1.4


This standard shall also specify optional requirements for flame resistance, moisture management, odorresistance, water resistance, and insect repellancy, and visibility markings where such options arespecified or claimed to be used in construction of station/ work apparel uniforms .





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The intent of the task group was to establish performance requirements of fabrics that make claimsthat the garment controls moisture by various fabric designs or inherent property. Further researchhas determined that quantifying a moisture management fabric or garment is a complicated matter.Testing apparatus and test methods available to the industry may indicate false positive or negativefindings and do not accurately represent or duplicate the implied comfort or moisture managementproperties of a given garment. NFPA 1975 is a safety standard and should not attempt to quantifyclaims of moisture management of a manufacturer. The NFPA 1975 task group recommends that allmoisture management requirements and inferences be stricken from the document.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph


9 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



10 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 5-NFPA 1975-2013 [ New Section after 1.2.1.2 ]

1.2.1.3

This standard shall also provide optional odor-resistant requirements and tests to verify theodor-resistant properties of textiles where the authority having jurisdiction specifies the use ofodor-resistant textiles for the construction of work apparel, or where the manufacturer represents workapparel textiles as having odor-resistant properties.

1.2.1.4

This standard shall also provide optional liquid resistance requirements and tests to verify the liquidresistance of textiles where the authority having jurisdiction specifies the use of liquid resistant textilesfor the construction of work apparel, or where the manufacturer represents work apparel textiles ashaving liquid resistant properties.

1.2.1.5

This standard shall also provide optional insect repellency requirements and tests to verify the insectrepellency of textiles where the authority having jurisdiction specifies the use of insect repellenttextiles for the construction of work apparel, or where the manufacturer represents work appareltextiles as having insect repellent properties.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Adds the optional requirements to the Purpose section to maintain consistency within thedocument. The term "moisture management" is removed and the paragraphs were renumbered.

ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 22-NFPA 1975-2012 [New Section after 1.2.1.2]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.


11 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



12 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


2.3.1 AATCC Publications.

American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, P.O. Box 12215, Research Triangle Park, NC27709.



AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, 2004 2010 .






Street Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Wed Jan 16 08:37:12 EST 2013

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates referenced publications to current edition.

Response Message:Public Comment No. 31-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. 2.3.1]

Public Comment No. 43-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. 2.3.1]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.


13 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



14 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


2.3.2 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D737 - Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics , 2008.


ASTM D 1683/D 1683M, Standard Test Method for Failure in Sewn Seams of Woven Apparel Fabrics,2011a.

ASTM D 3940, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength (Load) and Elongation of Sewn Seams ofKnit or Woven Stretch Textile Fabrics , 1983 (Withdrawn 1995).


ASTM D 6797, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength of Fabrics Constant Rate of Extension(CRE) Ball Burst Test , 2007 (2011).

ASTM E 2149, Standard Test Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of ImmobilizedAntimicrobial Agents Under Dynamic Contact Conditions, 2010.

ASTM F 2894, Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing and Equipment forHeat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven, 2011 2012 .





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Updates referenced publications to current edition. Also adds new ASTM test methodreferenced in the standard.

ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 32-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. 2.3.2]

Public Comment No. 54-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. 2.3.2]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


15 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



16 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


2.3.4 ISO Publications.

International Organization for Standardization, 1, rue de Varembé, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Geneve 20,Switzerland.

ISO 27, Guidelines for corrective action to be taken by a certification body in the event of misuse of itsmark of conformity, 1983.



ISO 9073-6, Textiles — Test Methods for Nonwoven — Part 6: Absorption , 2001 2003 .

ISO 17011, General requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies,2004.

ISO/IEC 17021, Conformity assessment — Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification ofmanagement systems, 2006.

ISO/IEC 17025, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, 2005.





Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates referenced publications to current edition.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


17 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



18 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


2.3.5* Other Publications.

Garment Specification for Trouser, Army Combat Uniform, GL-PD 07-14C, Evaluation of PermethrinTreated Fabric Materials: Extraction and Analysis by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.

US Department of Defense GL/PD 07-13C Purchase Description Coat, Army Combat Uniform, 2011.

Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 11th edition, Merriam-Webster, Inc., Springfield, MA, 2003.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The technical committee is providing this information related to the availability andacquisition of this document.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.


19 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



20 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


3.3.11 Garment.

See 3.3.28, Station/ Work Uniform Apparel Garment.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee is correcting an editorial error under its authority as granted by 3.4.2of the Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards. The correct title of 3.3.28 is"Work Apparel Garment."

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

10 Not Returned

17 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Beck, Eric J.

Duffy, Richard M.

Fargo, Cristine Z.

Johnson, James S.

Legendre, Jeff

Neilson, Gary L.


Reall, Jack E.

Tomlinson, Tim W.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Freese, Robert A.


21 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM



Haston, David V.

Hosea, Thomas M.

Lehtonen, Karen E.

Matthews, David G.

McKenna, Michael F.

Sanders, Stephen R.

Stull, Jeffrey O.


Varner, Bruce H.

Winer, Harry P.

Young, Richard H.


22 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


3.3.18 Moisture Management Fabric.

A fabric that has the properties of wickability, air permeability or breathability, and moisture vaportransfer properties as certified by the performance requirements of this standard.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:



Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.


23 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



24 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


3.3.19 Odor Control -Resistant .

A finish or an inherent property that guards against minimizes the growth of odors from microbial causes.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Odor control and odor resistance are both used in the optional requirements provided in thisstandard. Slightly different criteria are provided for both requirements and this difference should beresolved by the technical committee. It appears that the criteria are redundant and that onedefinition should be used. The use of the term odor-resistant is recommended by the technicalcommittee for consistency throughout the document.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.


25 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



26 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


3.3.26 Water Resistance.

A finish or an inherent property that repels water and other fluids limits the absorption of water .





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The water resistance properties are based on a water absoprtion test so it is better describedas a limitiation of water absoprtion than water repellence.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.


27 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



28 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 9-NFPA 1975-2013 [ New Section after 4.1.3 ]

4.1.3


Where station/work work uniform apparel garments are manufactured with flame resistant textiles, theentire garment shall be certified as compliant with the requirements of Section 7.2 7.2 , OptionalRequirements for Flame Resistant Station/Work Uniforms, in addition to all other requirements of thisstandard.

4.1.3.1


Where work apparel is manufactured with odor-resistant textiles, the entire garment shall be certifiedas compliant with the requirements of Section 7.3 , in addition to all other requirements of thisstandard.

4.1.3.2

Where work apparel is manufactured with water-resistant textiles, the entire garment shall be certifiedas compliant with the requirements of Section 7.4 , in addition to all other requirements of thisstandard.

4.1.3.3

Where work apparel is manufactured with insect repellent, the entire garment shall be certified ascompliant with the requirements of Section 7.5 , in addition to all other requirements of this standard.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Additional language is being recommended to specify that in addition to the optional requirementsall other requirements of the standard need to be met for the options that were added in the firstrevision. Currently this is only specified for the flame resistant option and should be specified for alloptions. References were updated to reflect changes made to Chapter 7.

ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 82-NFPA 1975-2012 [New Section after 4.1.3]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All




29 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



30 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


4.1.3


4.1.3



4.1.3.1


Where work apparel is manufactured with odor-resistant textiles, the entire garment shall be certifiedas compliant with the requirements of Section 7.3 , in addition to all other requirements of thisstandard.

4.1.3.2

Where work apparel is manufactured with water-resistant textiles, the entire garment shall be certifiedas compliant with the requirements of Section 7.4 , in addition to all other requirements of thisstandard.

4.1.3.3

Where work apparel is manufactured with insect repellent, the entire garment shall be certified ascompliant with the requirements of Section 7.5 , in addition to all other requirements of thisstandard.





Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Based on the reformat of chapter 7 this reference change is necessary.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All


31 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



32 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 53-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Section No. 4.1.7.2 ]

4.1.7.2


Where station/work work uniform apparel garments are is certified as compliant with the optionalrequirements specified in Section s 7.2 through 7.5 , Optional Requirements for Flame ResistantStation/Work Uniforms, in addition to all other requirements of this standard, the product label shall bearthe text specified in 5.1.6 .





Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The rewrite of chapter 7 requires that this reference change be made.

Response Message:Public Comment No. 101-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. 4.1.7.2]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.


33 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



34 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


4.1.9

The certification organization shall not issue any new certifications to the 2004 2009 edition of NFPA1975Standard on Station/Work Uniforms for Fire and Emergency Services on or after the NFPAeffective date for the 2014 edition of NFPA 1975,Standard on Station/Work Uniforms Apparel forEmergency Services 2009 2014 edition which is 29 December 2008 November 12, 2013 .





Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates administrative dates to reflect current cycle. Revises title of 2009 edition.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.


35 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



36 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


4.1.10

The certification organization shall not permit any manufacturer to continue to label any products that arecertified as compliant with the 2004 2009 edition of NFPA 1975, Standard on Station/Work Uniforms forFire and Emergency Services on or after 30 June 2009 November 12, 2013, plus 12 months .





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Updates administrative dates to reflect current cycle. Allows 12 months for the CertificationOrganizations to complete certification to the new edition. Also, this SR corrects the title of 2009edition.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.


37 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean


Affirmative with CommentHess, Diane B.

"November 12, 2013, plus 12 months" seems to be worded awkwardly. Why not just say "November 12, 2014"


38 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


4.1.11

The certification organization shall require manufacturers to remove all certification labels and productlabels indicating compliance with the 2004 2009 edition of NFPA 1975, Standard on Station/WorkUniforms for Fire and Emergency Services from all products that are under the control of themanufacturer on 30 June 2009 November 12, 2013, plus 12 months , and the certification organizationshall verify that this action is taken.





Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates administrative dates to reflect current cycle.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.


39 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Frank, James A.



Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



"November 12, 2013, plus 12 months" seems to be worded awkwardly. Why not just say "November 12, 2014"


40 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


5.1.1

Each station/work uniform garment shall have the minimum following compliance statement. (SeeA.4.1.8 .)

"THIS GARMENT MEETS NFPA 1975 (2013 ED)."

Work apparel shall have a product label or labels permanently and conspicuously attached to it. (SeeA.4.1.8 .)

5.1.1.1

The required label shall be permitted to be printed directly on the compliant product.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Current 5.1.1 text contains standard wording for the label requirement and should not be deleted.Text proposed in FR15 should be moved to 5.1.5 to replace the curren compliance statement.Allows for the option to print the required label information directly onto the product.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.



41 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



42 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


5.1.5

Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with only the mandatory requirementsof this standard, and is not certified with the optional flame resistance requirements , the followingstatement shall be printed legibly on the product label. All letters shall be at least 2.5 mm (

3 ⁄32

in.) high.

“THIS GARMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975 , STANDARD ONSTATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES, 2013 EDITION.

THIS GARMENT IS NOT FLAME RESISTANT!DO NOT REMOVE THIS LABEL!”

Where work apparel is certified as compliant with only the mandatory base requirements of thisstandard, the following statement shall be printed legibly on the product label. All letters shall be at least2.5 mm ( 3 ⁄32 in.) high.

THIS GARMENT MEETS THE BASE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975-2014 EDITION. DO NOTREMOVE THIS LABEL.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This comment relocates the reduced label text from First Revision No. 23 into 5.1.5. Thestatement "This garment is not flame resistant" was removed because garments meeting only themandatory requriement do not meet ANY of the optional requriements (e g moisture management,odor control, etc.).


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


43 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



44 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM



45 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

5.1.6

Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with the mandatory requirements ofthis standard, and also certified as compliant with one or more of the optional requirements of thisstandard, the following statement shall be printed legibly on the product label. All letters shall be at least2.5 mm ( 3 ⁄32 in.) high.

“THIS GARMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975 , STANDARD ONSTATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES, 2013 EDITION.


Where work apparel is certified as compliant with the mandatory base requirements of this standard, andalso certified as compliant with one or more of the optional requirements of this standard, the statementin 5.1.5 shall be printed legibly on the product label. The label shall also indicate the applicableoptional requirement(s) by either the symbol or statement as identified in Table 5.1.6. Where the symbolis used to identify compliance with the optional requirement(s), the statement shall be included in theuser information to explain that symbol. All letters shall be at least 2.5 mm ( 3 ⁄32 in.) high.

Table 5.1.6 Label Symbols for Work Apparel

Optional Requirement Compliance Statement Symbol

7.2 Optional Requirements forFlame Resistant Work Apparel

"THIS GARMENT MEETS THEOPTIONAL FLAMERESISTANCEREQUIREMENTS OF NFPA1975-2014."

7.3 Optional Requirements forOdor-Resistant Work Apparel

"THIS GARMENT MEETS THEOPTIONALODOR-RESISTANTREQUIREMENTS OF NFPA1975-2014."

7.4 Optional Requirements for WaterResistant Work Apparel

"THIS GARMENT MEETS THEOPTIONAL WATERRESISTANCEREQUIREMENTS OF NFPA1975-2014."

7.5 Optional Requirements for InsectRepellent Work Apparel

"THIS GARMENT MEETS THEOPTIONAL INSECTREPELLENTREQUIREMENTS OF NFPA1975-2014."


46 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

5.1.6.1


47 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with the mandatory requirements ofthis standard and also certified as compliant with the optional moisture management requirementsspecified in Section 7.9 , Optional Requirements for Moisture Management Station/Work Uniforms,the following statement shall be printed on the product label. All letters must be at least 2.5 mm ( 3 ⁄32

in) high.

“THIS GARMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975, STANDARD ONSTATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES, 2013 EDITION, AND THE

OPTIONAL MOISTURE MANAGEMENT TEXTILE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975. DO NOTREMOVE THIS LABEL!”


48 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

5.1.6.2

Where the station/work uniform garment is certified as compliant with the mandatory requirements ofthis standard and also certified as compliant with the optional odor control requirements specified inSection 7.8 , Optional Requirements for Odor Control Station/Work Uniforms, the followingstatement shall be printed on the product label. All letters must be at least 2.5 mm ( 3 ⁄32 in) high


OPTIONAL ODOR CONTROL TEXTILE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975. DO NOT REMOVETHIS LABEL!”


49 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

5.1.6.3

Where the station/work uniform apparel garment is certified as compliant with the mandatoryrequirements of this standard and also certified as compliant with the water penetration resistancerequirements specified in Section 7.11 , Optional Requirements for Liquid Resistant Station/WorkUniforms, the following statement shall be printed on the product label. All letters must be at least2.5 mm ( 3 ⁄32 in) high.


OPTIONAL WATER RESISTANT TEXTILE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975. DO NOT REMOVETHIS LABEL!”


50 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

5.1.6.4

Where the station/work uniform apparel garment is certified as compliant with the mandatoryrequirements of this standard and also certified as compliant with the optional insect repellentrequirements specified in Section 7.12 , Optional Requirements for Insect RepellencyStation/Work Uniforms, the following statement shall be printed on the product label. All lettersmust be at least 2.5 mm ( 3 ⁄32 in) high.

“THIS GARMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975, STANDARD ONSTATION/WORK UNIFORMS FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES, 2013 EDITION, AND THEOPTIONAL INSECT REPELLENT TEXTILE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1975. DO NOT

REMOVE THIS LABEL!”


51 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

5.1.6.5


52 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Where the station/work uniform apparel is certified as compliant with one or more of the followingoptional requirements of this standard, a symbol may be printed or applied in close proximity tothe compliance statement in 5.1.6 to identify the garment as compliant with the respectiveoptional requirement(s). All letters shall be at least 2 mm ( 1 ⁄16 in.) high.

Table 5.1.6(b) Label Symbols for Station/Work Uniforms

Symbol to be Printed onLabel

Optional Requirement

7.5 Optional Requirements for Flame Resistant Station/WorkUniforms

7.9 Optional Requirements for Moisture Management Station/WorkUniforms

7.10 Optional Requirements for Odor Control Station/WorkUniforms


53 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.11 Optional Requirements for Liquid Resistant Station/WorkUniforms

7.12 Optional Requirements for Insect Repellency Station/WorkUniforms

Supplemental Information

File Name Descriptionrev_NFPA_1975_SR_17_Section_5.1.6_Rewrite.G1358357420570.docx Paragraph 5.1.6 Rewrite





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The labeling requirements identified in the first draft do not reduce labeling text desired by thecommittee. This comment allows the use of a symbol or a shortened compliance statement on thelabel or garment element. Where a symbol is used, it is required that the statement accompany thegarment element in the user information. Removed sub-paragraphs to 5.1.6 since these areredundant to the table. See the attachment for revised text.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.


54 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



55 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


5.2.1


The product label for the portions of the product label information not specified in 5.1.1 through 5.1.4shall be permitted to be a hang tag affixed to each station/work uniform or shall be permitted to beprinted on a sheet that is inserted and sealed in the packaging that immediately contains thestation/work uniform .





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This paragraph is a label requirement and not a user information requirement. This statement wasdeleted because the proposed revisions to 5.1.6 allow for the use of the symbol or the verbiage.The use of the symbol will allow for a sufficient reduction in size of the label to allow for itsplacement on the product.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.


56 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



57 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


6.1.4

Where station/work uniforms are constructed from flame resistant textiles, station/work uniforms shallmeet all requirements specified in Section 7.5 , Optional Requirements for Flame ResistantStation/Work Uniforms, to be certified as complying with the optional flame resistance requirements.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The paragraph is not design criteria. This criteria is already addressed in Chapter 7 forperformance criteria.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.


58 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



59 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


6.1.4

Where work apparel garments are constructed from flame-resistant textiles, the garments shall bestitched with thread of an inherently flame-resistant fiber.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee has determined that this change is necessary because it believes thatthis issue has not had sufficient public review and no precedent was provided for the deletion ofparagraph 6.1.5. The CC is therefore making this change as permitted under its responsibilities asspecified in paragraph 3.4.3 (g) of the Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards.

Committee Comment No. 20-NFPA 1975-2013 [Section No. 6.1.5]

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

10 Not Returned

17 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Beck, Eric J.

Duffy, Richard M.

Fargo, Cristine Z.

Johnson, James S.

Legendre, Jeff

Neilson, Gary L.


Reall, Jack E.

Tomlinson, Tim W.


Arrington, Joseph


60 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Corrado, Steven D.

Freese, Robert A.



Haston, David V.

Hosea, Thomas M.

Lehtonen, Karen E.

Matthews, David G.

McKenna, Michael F.

Sanders, Stephen R.

Stull, Jeffrey O.


Varner, Bruce H.

Winer, Harry P.

Young, Richard H.


61 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 23-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Sections 6.1.6, 6.1.7, 6.1.8, 6.1.9 ]





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The proposed paragraphs for deletion are not design criteria. These criteria are alreadyaddressed in Chapter 5 for labeling and in Chapter 7 for performance criteria.

ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 78-NFPA 1975-2012 [Sections 6.1.6, 6.1.7, 6.1.8, 6.1.9]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.




62 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



63 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


6.2.1

Station/work uniform garments Work apparel designed for the upper torso shall be permitted to beconfigured as follows:


(2) Polo or golf-style shirt, with collar, pullover with partial front opening, either long sleeve or shortsleeve

(3) Tee shirt, pullover without front opening, without collar, either long sleeve or short sleeve (SeeA.1.1.2.)


(5) Jacket, with or without collar, with full front opening and long sleeves





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Section 1.1.2 does not prohibit outerwear. This clarifies the configuration of acceptableouterwear. The technical committee also added additional configurations for tee shirts.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.

Affirmative All


64 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Allen, Jason L.

Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



65 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 51-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Chapter 7 ]


66 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Chapter 7 Performance Requirements


67 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.1 Base Requirements for Work Apparel.


68 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.1.1 Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance.


69 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.1.1.1

Textile fabrics, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified inSection 8.2 , and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite, and shall not shrink more than 10 percent inany direction. Where the optional stretching frame is specified to be used for testing knits, fabrics shallbe able to be stretched to their original dimensions and remain intact.


70 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.1.1.2

Findings and visibility markings — excluding emblems, collar stays, elastic, and hook and pilefasteners when placed where they will not come into direct contact with the body — shall be testedindividually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2 , and shall not melt, drip, separate, orignite.


71 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.1.2 Thermal Stability.


72 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.1.2.1

Textile fabrics, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for thermal stability as specified inSection 8.3 , and shall not melt, ignite, or stick to the glass plates and shall have a rating ofresistance to blocking of 1 or 2.


73 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.1.2.2

All thread utilized in work apparel shall be tested for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.7 ,and shall not melt at or below 260°C (500°F).


74 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.1.3 Seam Strength.


75 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.1.3.1

Garment major seams shall be tested for seam strength as specified in Section 8.4 , and shallhave a minimum breaking strength of 133 N (30 lb) for either thread or fabric.


76 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.1.3.2

Seam strength shall be considered acceptable where the fabric strength is less than the requiredseam strength specified in 7.1.3.1 , provided the fabric fails without seam failure below theapplicable forces specified in 7.1.3.1 .


77 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.1.4 Product Label Printing Durability.

Product labels shall be tested for printing durability as specified in Section 8.5 , and shall belegible.


78 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.2 Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance.

(See Section B.1 .)


79 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.2.1

Woven and nonwoven textiles, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for heatresistance as specified in Section 8.2 , Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shallnot melt, drip, separate, or ignite, and shall not shrink more than 10 percent in any direction.


80 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.2.2

Knits, excluding interlinings shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section8.2 , Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite,shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall not break, and shall not shrinkmore than 18 percent in any direction..


81 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.2.3

Findings and visibility markings — excluding both emblems and collar stays, elastic, and hookand pile fasteners when placed where they will not come into direct contact with the body —shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2 , Heat and ThermalShrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite.


82 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.2 Thermal Stability.

(See Section B.2 )


83 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.2.1

Textiles, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for thermal stability as specified inSection 8.3 , Thermal Stability Test, and shall not melt, ignite, or stick to the glass plates andshall have a rating of resistance to blocking of 1 or 2.


84 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.2.2

All thread utilized in the station/work uniform apparel garments shall be tested for heatresistance as specified in Section 8.7 , Thread Heat Resistance Test, and shall not melt at orbelow 260°C (500°F). (See Section B.6 .)


85 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.3 Seam Strength.

Garment major seams shall be tested for seam strength as specified in Section 8.4 , SeamBreaking Strength Test, and shall have a minimum breaking strength of 133 N (30 lb) for eitherthread or fabric. (See Section B.3 .)


86 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.2 Product Label Printing Durability.

Product labels shall be tested for printing durability as specified in Section 8.5 , Label PrintDurability Test, and shall be legible. (See Section B.4 .)


87 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.2* Optional Requirements for Flame-Resistant Station/Work Uniforms Work Apparel .


88 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.2.1

Where work apparel is represented as being flame resistant it shall also meet therequirements of 7.1 .


89 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.2.2

Where station/work uniforms are work apparel is represented as being flame resistant, textilefabrics and visibility markings s, excluding interlinings, emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pilefasteners , and closure tape, shall be tested individually for flame resistance as specified inSection 8.6, Flame Resistance Test, and shall have an average char length of not more than150 mm (6 in.), shall have an average afterflame of not more than 2.0 seconds, and shall notmelt or drip. (See Section B.5.)


90 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.2.3

Where station/work uniforms are work apparel is represented as being flame resistant,visibility markings and small textile items, excluding interlinings, emblems, labels, elastic, hookand pile fasteners , and closure tape, that are not large enough to meet the specimenrequirements specified in 8.6.3.1 shall be tested for flame resistance as specified in Section8.6, Flame Resistance Test, and shall not be totally consumed, shall not have afterflame ofmore than 2.0 seconds, and shall not melt or drip. (See Section B.5 .)


91 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.2.4

Where station/work uniforms are represented as being flame resistant, woven andnonwoven textiles, excluding interlinings, shall be tested individually for heat resistance asspecified in Section 8.2 , Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt,drip, separate, or ignite, and shall not shrink more than 10 percent in any direction.


92 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.2.5

Where station/work uniforms are represented as being flame resistant, knits, excludinginterlinings, shall be tested individually for heat resistance as specified in Section 8.2 ,Heat and Thermal Shrinkage Resistance Test, and shall not melt, drip, separate, or ignite,shall be able to be stretched to the original dimensions, shall not break, and shall not shrinkmore than 10 percent in any direction.


93 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.3 Optional Requirements for Odor-Resistant Work Apparel.


94 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.3.1

Where work apparel is represented as being odor resistant it shall also meet therequirements of Section 7.1 .


95 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.3.2

Where work apparel is represented as being odor - resistant, textile fabrics, excludingvisibility markings, emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape,shall be tested individually as specified in Section 8.8 , and shall have a minimumpercentage reduction of 99.0 percent in 1 hour.


96 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.4* Optional Requirements for Water-Resistant Work Apparel.


97 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.4.1

Where work apparel is represented as being water resistant it shall also meet therequirements of Section 7.1 .


98 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.4.2

Where work apparel is represented as being water resistant, textile fabrics, excludingvisibility markings, emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape,shall be tested as specified in Section 8.9 , and shall have a water absorption of 15percent or less.


99 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.5* Optional Requirements for Insect Repellent Work Apparel.


100 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.5.1

Where work apparel is represented as being insect repellent it shall also meet therequirements of Section 7.1 .


101 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.5.2

Where work apparel is represented as having insect repellent properties, textilematerials, excluding interlinings and reinforcements, shall be tested for insectrepellency as specified in Section 8.10 , and shall have a permethrin level of 0.025 –

0.135 mg/cm 2 .


102 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.5.3

Where work apparel is represented as having insect repellent properties as specified inSection 7.5 and are also represented as having flame resistant properties asspecified in Section "[Quick Mark]"7.2 , textiles, excluding interlinings, emblems,labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, shall be individually re-testedafter treatment for insect repellency for flame resistance as specified in Section 8.6 ,and shall have an average char length of not more than 150 mm (6 in.), shall have anaverage afterflame time of not more than 2.0 seconds, and shall not melt or drip.


103 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.5.3

Where work apparel is represented as having insect repellent properties as specifiedin Section 7.5 and are also represented as having flame resistant properties asspecified in Section 7.2 , textiles, excluding interlinings, emblems, labels, elastic,hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, shall be individually re-tested aftertreatment for insect repellency for flame resistance as specified in Section 8.6 , andshall have an average char length of not more than 150 mm (6 in.), shall have anaverage afterflame time of not more than 2.0 seconds, and shall not melt or drip.


104 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

7.3 Optional Requirements for Visibility Markings.

7.3.1

Where visibility markings are used on garments, the visibility markings shall complywith the requirements of 7.1.2 .

7.3.2

Where the garment is certified to the optional flame resistance requirement, thevisibility markings shall comply with the optional flammability requirements in .

7.4 Optional Requirements for Moisture-Wicking Station/Work Uniforms.

Where station/work uniforms are represented as being moisture-wicking, textiles,excluding interlinings and reinforcements, shall be tested for the liquid wicking rate,as specified in Section 8.8 , Liquid Wicking Rate Test, and shall have a water risetime of 30 seconds.


Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistant properties,textiles shall be tested for the microbial resistance, as specified in Section 8.9 ,Odor Resistance Effectiveness Test, and shall have a 99.9% reduction of bacteria.

7.6 Optional Requirements for Moisture Management Station/Work Uniforms.

7.6.1

Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles,excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape,when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be testedindividually as specified in Section 8.10 , Liquid Moisture Management Properties,and shall have a minimum Overall Moisture Management Capability (OMMC)grading of 0.8.

7.6.2

Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles,excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fastners, and closure tape, whenplaced where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be testedindividually as specified in Section 8.12, Vertical Wicking Test with a minimumwicking rate of 2" in 20 minutes.

7.6.3

Where station/work uniforms are represented as managing moisture, textiles,excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fastners, and closure tape, whenplaced where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be testedindividually as specified in Section 8.13 , Air Permeability Test, and shall have a

minimum air flow rate of 200 cfm/ft 2 .

7.7 Optional Requirements for Odor Control Station/Work Uniforms.

7.7.1

Where station/work uniforms are represented as being odor control, textiles,excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape,when placed where they will come in contact with the body/skin, shall be testedindividually as specified in Section 8.11, Antibacterial Finish Test, and shall havea minimum reduction of 99.0 percent in 24 hours.

7.8 Optional Requirements for Liquid Resistant Station/Work Uniforms.

7.8.1

Where station/work uniforms are represented as water resistance textiles,excluding emblems, labels, elastic, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tapeshall be tested as specified in Section 8.14 Water Absorption Resistance Test,and shall have a water absorption of 15percent or less.

7.9 Optional Requirements for Insect Repellency Station/Work Uniform.

7.9.1

Where station/work uniforms are represented as having insect repellencyproperties, textiles, excluding interlinings and reinforcements, shall be tested forinsect repellency as specified in Section 8.15 , and shall have 0.52 percent ofpermethrin weight/weight ± 10 percent.


105 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Supplemental Information

File Name Descriptionrev_Chapter_7_Rewrite.G1358388631911.docx Chapter 7 Rewrite





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Reorganization of Chapter 7 is being proposed to clarify the base requirements for all work apparelin one section (new 7.1) and the optional requirements (new 7.2, 7.3, etc). This will help clarify thatall the requirements in 7.1 are required to label work apparel as compliant with NFPA 1975. Theremaining sections are identified as optional. The revised Chapter 7 is being provided via anattachment.

ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 99-NFPA 1975-2012 [Chapter 7]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.


106 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM



Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve

Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



7.1.3.1 and 7.1.3.2 seem to be contradictory. 7.1.3.1 requires minimum breaking strength "for either thread orfabric" However, 7.1.3.2 allows less than specified strength, if the fabric fails without seam failure. This is in directcontradition with 7.1.3.1 if the requirement is "for either thread or fabric".

Negative with CommentKrause, II, George R.

7.1.1.1 This standard is not intended for primary protective garments, but rather for garments worn under theprimary protective clothing and as such it seems design restrictive to require the same thermal shrinkage as isfound in NFPA 1971. It would seem desirable for the thermal shrinkage requirements for next to skin layer or baselayers to allow for a wider breadth of materials; a 15% shrinkage requirement could allow for more comfortablematerials without compromising fire fighter safety. 7.1.2.1 This standard is not intended for primary protectivegarments, but rather for garments worn under the primary protective clothing and as such is seems absurd torequire testing that exceeds the requirements of NFPA 1971. Section 8.2 is oven testing for 6 hours with glassplates at temperatures exceeding the hot air oven requirements of NFPA 1971.


107 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.2.1.2

Modifications to this test method for testing woven and nonwoven textiles shall be as specified in 8.2.8.





Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The technical committee is clarifying woven and nonwoven test method requirements.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.


108 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



109 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.2.1.4

Modifications to this test method for testing knits shall be as specified in 8.2.10 .





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The technical committee is providing this information on the modification of the test methodfor testing knits.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.




110 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



111 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.2.3.1

Heat resistance testing only shall be conducted on a minimum of three specimens for each finding notexcluded in 7.1.1.2.





Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Based on revisions to Chapter 7 this reference change is necessary.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



112 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



113 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.2.5 Procedure.

Testing shall be performed in accordance with ASTM F 2894, Standard Test Method for Evaluation ofMaterials, Protective Clothing and Equipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven, usingthe following parameters:


(2) The optional stretching frame shall be used, as specified in 8.2.10.5 and 8.2.10.6 , to evaluateknit materials, where specified by the fabric manufacturer .





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Use of the stretching frame is optional in the ASTM method. The technical committee isclarifying text to specify how the stretching frame is to be used.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.


114 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



115 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.2.8 Specific Requirements for Testing Woven and Nonwoven Testing Textiles.

8.2.8.1

Each specimen shall be 380 mm × 380 mm, ±13 mm (15 in. × 15 in., ±1⁄2 in.).

8.2.8.2


8.2.8.3

Observations of ignition, melting, dripping, or separation shall be recorded and reported.

8.2.8.4

Five minutes after the specified exposure, and prior to measuring shrinkage, woven and nonwoventextile specimens shall be restored to their original state by manually flattening any curling or ripplingthat resulted from the specified exposure.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The technical committee is providing clarifying language on handling of woven andnonwoven specimens after heat exposure.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.



116 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



117 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.2.10 Specific Requirements for Testing Knits.

8.2.10.1

Each specimen shall be 380 mm × 380 mm ±13 mm (15 in. × 15 in. ±1 ⁄2 1⁄2 in. ).

8.2.10.2


8.2.10.3

Observations of ignition, melting, dripping, separation, breaking, or inability to be stretched to theoriginal dimensions or separation for each specimen shall be recorded and reported.

8.2.10.4

Any evidence of ignition, melting, dripping, separation, breaking, or inability to be stretched to theoriginal dimensions shall constitute failing performance. or separation for each specimen shall berecorded and reported.

8.2.10.5

Where the use of the optional stretching frame is specified by the fabric manufacturer, 5 minutesafter the specified exposure, knit textiles shall be pulled to their original dimensions and held for 10minutes, following by a 10-minute relaxation prior to measuring shrinkage.

8.2.10.6

Where the optional stretching frame is specified to be used, and fabrics exhibit breaking or inabilityto be stretched to the original dimensions, this result shall constitute failure.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The technical committee is providing clarifying information as to how and when to use theoptional stretching frame when specified.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


118 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



119 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.3.4.1

The test oven shall be as specified in ISO 17493 ASTM E F 2894 , Clothing and equipment forprotection against heat — Test method for convective heat resistance using a hot air circulatingoven Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing and Equipment for HeatResistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven .





Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Replaces the ISO standard with the ASTM standard to be consistent with Section 8.2.4.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.


120 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



121 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.3.5 Procedure.

Specimens shall be tested according to ASTM D 751, Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics, usingthe Procedures for Blocking Resistance at Elevated Temperatures, specified in Sections 84 through 88,with the following modifications:




(4) In removing specimens from the glass plates, the rating of resistance to blocking shall bedetermined and observations shall be made whether each specimen sticks to the glass plates orshows evidence of melting or ignition.

In removing specimens from the glass plates, the rating of resistance to blocking shall bedetermined and observations shall be made whether each specimen sticks to the glass plates orshows evidence of melting or ignition. The determination of a specimen sticking to the glass platesshall be made by placing the glass plates and specimen on a flat level surface and raising the topglass plate in a smooth continuous motion with the plate parallel to the surface and observing if thematerial separates from either of the glass plates. If the tested fabric separates from the lower glassplate but clings to the upper glass plate, invert the upper glass, lay it on a flat surface and raise thefabric with a smooth continuous motion. If the fabric does not separate cleanly from either of theglass plates, or if it lifts the glass plate completely off the surface, then it shall be judged as sticking.

(5) Where the specimen size is such that a 102 mm × 102 mm (4 in. × 4 in.) square cannot be achieved,three specimens shall be tested folded face to face, and three specimens shall be tested folded backto back.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

No specific procedures are provided for making a determination of whether the specimens stickto the glass plate. The provided instruction is intended to clarify how this determination is made.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned


122 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



123 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.4.2.3

Where the sample is prepared by joining two pieces of knit or woven stretch textiles, the textiles shall bejoined as specified in 7.2.2 of ASTM D 3940, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength (Load) andElongation of Sewn Seams of Knit or Woven Stretch Textile Fabrics . ASTM D 6797, Standard TestMethod for Bursting Strength of Fabrics Constant Rate of Extension (CRE) Ball Burst Test.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Test method for knit seams was changed in other places in the document. This change istherefore necessary for document consistency.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.


124 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



125 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.4.4.2

All knit seam assemblies shall be tested in accordance with ASTM D 3940, Standard Test Method forBursting Strength (Load) and Elongation of Sewn Seams of Knit and Woven Stretch TextileFabrics. 6797, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength of Fabrics Constant Rate of Extension(CRE) Ball Burst Test . Padding of the clamps shall be permitted to prevent fabric slippage due to thethickness of the seam. The seam allowance shall be placed facing away from the penetrating ball.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

ASTM D 3940 was withdrawn from ASTM in 1995. The last version of this standard is from 1983.However ASTM D 6797 is a current standard and appears to be virtually identical to ASTM D 3940.The provision also has to be made to allow for padding of the clamps to prevent fabric slippage dueto the thickness of the seam.

ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 35-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. 8.4.4.2]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.


126 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



127 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.4.4.3

Evaluation for sewn seam strength in accordance with Section 11.1 of ASTM D 1683, Standard TestMethod for Failure in Sewn Seams of Woven Fabrics , shall be used to determine pass/failperformance.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Performing the test in accordance with ASTM D1683 would include the caluclation of theseam strength. Therefore, this statement is redudant.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.


128 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



129 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 55-NFPA 1975-2013 [ New Section after 8.4.5 ]

8.4.5.3

The type of seams tested shall be reported as to whether the specimens were cut from the finishedgarment or prepared from fabric samples.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This reporting language is specified in other NFPA protective clothing and equipment standardsrelated to seam strength testing. That text is being added here for consistency.

ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 88-NFPA 1975-2012 [New Section after 8.4.5]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.


130 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



131 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 49-NFPA 1975-2013 [ New Section after 8.6.1.5.1 ]

8.6.1.6

Modifications to this test method for testing textile materials that are represented as being flameresistant and insect repellent shall be as specified in 8.6.13 .





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The technical committee added clarity to how insect repellent fire resistant materials are tobe tested.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



132 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


Hess, Diane B.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean


Affirmative with CommentHorn, Gavin P.

This section should reference 8.6.13 instead of 8.6.12


133 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.6.13 Specific Requirements for Testing Insect Repellent Materials.

8.6.13.1

Textile fabrics that are represented as being both insect repellent and flame resistant shall be tested inboth the pre– and post–insect repellent treatment configurations.

8.6.13.2 Pre-Treated Textile Materials.

8.6.13.2.1

Woven pre–insect repellent treatment textile materials shall be tested in accordance with 8.6.8 .

8.6.13.2.2

Knit pre–insect repellent treatment textile materials shall be tested in accordance with 8.6.9 .

8.6.13.3 Woven Post-Treated Textile Materials.

8.6.13.3.1


8.6.13.3.2

No two warp specimens shall contain the same warp yarns, and no two filling specimens shallcontain the same filling yarns.

8.6.13.3.3


8.6.13.3.4


8.6.13.4 Knit Post-Treated Textile Materials.

8.6.13.4.1


8.6.13.4.2

Samples for conditioning shall include material that is a minimum of 75 mm × 305 mm (3 in. × 12in.).

8.6.13.4.3


8.6.13.4.4


8.6.13.4.4






Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The technical committee is adding a new section to clarify how fire resistant insect repellentmaterials are to be tested.


134 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



135 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 30-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Section No. 8.8 ]

8.8 Liquid Wicking Rate Test.

8.8.1 Application.

This test method shall apply to the primary textiles used in the construction of the station/workuniform .

8.8.2 Samples.

8.8.2.1


8.8.2.2

Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall bepreconditioned according to 8.1.3 .

8.8.2.3

Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be dry cleaned, separate samples shallbe preconditioned according to 8.1.4 .

8.8.3 Specimens.


8.8.4 Apparatus.

The test set-up shall be as specified in ISO 9073-6, Textiles —Test Methods for Nonwoven—Part 6:Absorption.

8.8.5 Procedure.

Testing shall be conducted in accordance with the liquid wicking rate procedures of ISO 9073-6,Textiles—Test Methods for Nonwoven—Part 6: Absorption.

8.8.6 Report.

The time for water to rise 25 mm (1 in.) for each individual specimen and the overall average for allspecimens shall be recorded and reported.


Pass/fail determination shall be based on the average reported time for water rise for allspecimens tested.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

A task group of the technical committee was established to identify performance requirements offabrics that make claims that the garment controls moisture by various fabric designs or inherentproperty. Further research has determined that quantifying a moisture management fabric or garmentis a complicated matter. Testing apparatus and test methods available to the industry may indicatefalse positive or negative findings and do not accurately represent or duplicate the implied comfort ormoisture management properties of a given garment. NFPA 1975 is a safety standard and should notattempt to quantify claims of moisture management of a manufacturer. The technical committeerecommends that all moisture management requirements and inferences be stricken from thedocument.


136 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 73-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. 8.8]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



137 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.9 Odor Resistance Effectiveness Test.

8.9.1 Application.


8.9.2 Samples.

8.9.2.1


8.9.2.2

Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall bepreconditioned according to 8.1.3 .

8.9.2.3

Where the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be dry cleaned, separate samples shallbe preconditioned according to 8.1.4 .

8.9.3 Specimens.


8.9.4 Apparatus.

The test set-up shall be as specified in AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials,Assessment of.

8.9.5 Procedure.

Testing shall be conducted in accordance with AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on TextileMaterials, Assessment of, using both Staphyloccoccus aureus and Klebsiella pneumonia .

8.9.6 Report.

The percent reduction of bacteria for each specimen shall be recorded and reported.


Pass/fail determination shall be based on the average percent reduction for all specimens testedfor each type of bacteria tested. Failing performance for one type of bacteria shall constitute failureof the textile.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The Odor Resistance Test and the Antimicrobial Finish Test are identical except that the lattertest method also references ASTM E 2149. The Antimicrobial Finish Test in 8.11 appears to bemore complete.


Ballot Results


138 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



139 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.10 Liquid Moisture Management Properties.

8.10.1 Application.

This test method shall apply to textiles identified as moisture management fabrics

8.10.2 Samples.

8.10.2.1


8.10.2.2

Samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3 (25 Wash/Dry).

8.10.3 Apparatus.

The apparatus shall be as specified in AATCC 195, Liquid Moisture Management Properties ofTextile Fabrics.

8.10.4 Procedure.

Testing shall be performed in accordance with AATCC 195, Liquid Moisture Management Propertiesof Textile Fabrics.

8.10.5 Report.

8.10.5.1

The Overall Moisture Management Capability (OMMC) shall be reported for each specimen.

8.10.5.2

The average OMMC shall be reported for all specimens.


The average OMMC shall be used to determine pass/fail.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The representative for the manufacturer of the equipment used in AATCC 195 stated that it wasa developmental tool and did not recommend incorporating the results of its testing into aperformance standard.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned


140 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



141 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.8 Antibacterial Finish Test. Odor Resistance Test

8.8.1 Application.


This test method shall apply to textiles identified as odor - resistan ce t fabrics.

8.8.2 Samples.

8.8.2.1


8.8.2.2

Samples shall be preconditioned according to 8.1.3 (25 Wash/Dry) .

8.8.3 Specific Requirements for Testing Leaching or Nonbonded Antibacterial Finishes.

8.8.3.1

Where the antibacterial finish to be evaluated is of the leaching or nonbonded type, testing shall beperformed in accordance with AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials: Assessment of,using the following parameters:

(1) The qualitative test procedure shall be used.

(2) The incubation period shall be 24 hours 1 hour .



8.8.4 Specific Requirements for Testing Nonleaching or Bonded Antibacterial Finishes.

8.8.4.1

Where the antibacterial finish to be evaluated is of the nonleaching or bonded type, testing shall beperformed in accordance with ASTM E2149, Standard Test Method for Determining the AntimicrobialActivity of Immobilized Antimicrobial Agents Under Dynamic Contact Conditions, using the followingparameters:



8.8.5 Report.

8.8.5.1

The method used for evaluation shall be reported.

8.8.5.2

The percent reduction shall be reported for each specimen.

8.8.5.3

The average percent reduction shall be reported for all specimens.


The average percent reduction shall be used to determine pass/fail.




Street Address:City:State:Zip:


142 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Submittal Date: Sun Feb 17 15:47:20 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The test method name change properly reflects that intention of the test method. In 8.11.3.1, thetechnical committee is adding this change for consistency with the performance requirements.Model test procedures indicates a 1 hour test duration to achieve a 99% reduction or eliminate afalse positive.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



143 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.12 Vertical Wicking Test.

8.12.1 Application

8.12.1.1


8.12.2 Samples

8.12.2.1

A sample size of 152 mm × 25 mm (6 in. × 1 in.) shall be cut with the 152 mm (6 in.) cut measured inthe wale direction.

8.12.3 Specimens

8.12.3.1

Specimens shall be conditioned as specified in 8.1.2 .

8.12.4 Apparatus.

8.12.4.1

A 500 ml (17 oz) Erlenmeyer flask shall be filled with 200 ml (7 oz) of colored distilled water (foodcoloring used shall be a contrasting color to the cloth material to make the water level visible on thesample).

8.12.5 Procedure.

8.12.5.1

The test shall be conducted in the following manner:

(1) Pierce the top edge of the sample with a long straight pin and suspend it from the top of theflask

(2) After 1 minute, remove the sample from the flask

(3) Measure and record the water level on the sample in inches

(4) Return the sample to the flask

(5) Remeasure in 3 minutes, 5 minutes, and at each subsequent 5-minute interval until eitherthe water level reaches 6 in. or 1 hour has elapsed

8.12.6 Report.

8.12.6.1

Values are reported as inches per hour.

8.12.6.2

A minimum of three samples shall be tested with the average value reported along with eachindividual measurement.


8.12.7.1

The average water levels for each specimen tested shall be used to determine pass/failperformance.




Street Address:City:State:


144 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Zip:Submittal Date: Tue Jan 15 18:13:29 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:


ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



145 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


146 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.13 Air Permeability Test.

8.13.1 Application.

8.13.1.1


8.13.2 Samples.

8.13.2.1


8.13.3 Specimens.

8.13.3.1

Specimens shall be conditioned as specified in 8.1.2

8.13.4 Apparatus.

8.13.4.1

The test apparatus specified in ASTM D 737, Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of TextileFabrics, shall be used.

8.13.5 Procedure.

8.13.5.1

Air permeability testing shall be performed in accordance with ASTM D 737, Standard Test Methodfor Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics.

8.13.6 Report.

8.13.6.1

The air flow rate for each specimen tested shall be recorded and reported to the nearest cfm/ft 2 .

8.13.6.2

The average air flow rate of all specimens shall be calculated and reported to the nearest

cfm/ft 2 .


8.13.7.1

The average air flow rate for the specimens tested shall be used to determine pass/failperformance.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The intent of the task group was to establish performance requirements of fabrics that make claimsthat the garment controls moisture by various fabric designs or inherent property. Further researchhas determined that quantifying a moisture management fabric or garment is a complicated matter.Testing apparatus and test methods available to the industry may indicate false positive or negativefindings and do not accurately represent or duplicate the implied comfort or moisture managementproperties of a given garment. NFPA 1975 is a safety standard and should not attempt to quantify


147 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

claims of moisture management of a manufacturer. The NFPA 1975 task group recommends that allmoisture management requirements and inferences be stricken from the document.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



148 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.9.2.2

If the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall bepreconditioned according to 8.1.3.1 8.1.3.2 .

8.9.2.2

If the manufacturer designates that the garments are to be washed, separate samples shall bepreconditioned according to 8.1.3.1 8.1.3.2 .





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Current water repellant finishes will not achieve the required level of water absorption after 100launderings. The technical committee wanted to evaluate water absorption after 25 launderingswhich is consistent with the preconditioning of other optional requirements such as Odor Control.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul


149 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



150 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


8.10 Optional Insect Repellency Test. Reserved.

8.10.1 Application.

This test method shall apply to textile materials identified as insect repellent.

8.10.2 Samples.

Samples shall be as specified in section 4.5.1 of Department of Defense GL/PD 07-13C PurchaseDescription Coat, Army Combat Uniform .

8.10.3 Procedure.

Testing and conditioning shall be as specified in section 4.5.1 of Department of Defense GL/PD07-13C Purchase Description Coat, Army Combat Uniform .

8.10.4 Report.

The individual concentration for each specimen in milligrams per square centimeter permethrin to thenearest 0.001 mg, shall be reported.


Failure of an individual specimen shall constitute failure of the material.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The technical committee is providing the insect repellency test procedures per thereferenced method.

Response Message:Public Comment No. 62-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. 8.15]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


151 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



152 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 36-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Section No. A.1.1.2 ]

A.1.1.2

Station/work uniform garments are Work apparel is made from thermally stable materials. Garments suchas fitness clothing and underclothing might not be made from thermally stable materials and should notbe worn while on duty. Such non-thermally stable garments are made from fibers with relatively lowmelting points and can can contribute to burn injury. These types of performance fitness clothing shouldalso not be worn as undergarments beneath work apparel.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Clarifies the existing text and utilizes some of the text that was deleted from A.6.1.2 in FR25.

Response Message:Public Comment No. 89-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. A.1.1.2]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.


153 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



154 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


A.1.1.6


The authority having jurisdiction should conduct a risk assessment and determine the level of visibilityrequired for station/work uniforms work apparel based on the anticipated use of such garments duringthese incidents. Where the AHJ anticipates visibility hazards, such as darkness, obscuration (smoke, fog,dust), and proximity to traffic, moving machinery, or heavy equipment operation, the AHJ should be awareof various types of visibility markings. In the case of personnel operating in proximity to traffic, movingmachinery, or heavy equipment in operation, the AHJ needs to understand that special high-visibilitymarkings are required by 23 CFR 655. This regulation requires that the Manual on Uniform Traffic ControlDevices (MUTCD) be followed on all roads open to public travel. In Section 6D.03, the MUTCD specifiesthat all workers, including emergency responders, within the right-of-way who are exposed either to trafficor to work vehicles and construction equipment within the Temporary Traffic Control (TTC) zone shallwear high-visibility safety apparel that meets the Performance Class 2 or 3 requirements of ANSI/ISEA107, High-Visibility Safety Apparel and Headwear . Section 6D.03 includes an option specifying that inlieu of ANSI/ISEA 107 apparel, emergency and incident responders and law enforcement personnelwithin the TTC zone may wear high-visibility safety apparel that meets the performance requirements ofANSI/ISEA 207, High-Visibility Public Safety Vests . An additional option within Section 6D.03 specifiesthat fire fighters and other emergency responders working within the right-of-way and engaged inemergency operations that directly expose them to flame, fire, heat, or hazardous materials may wearretroreflective turn-out gear that is specified and regulated by other organizations, such as NFPA.

ANSI/ISEA 107, High-Visibility Safety Apparel and Headwear, 2004. ANSI/ISEA 207, High-VisibilityPublic Safety Vests, 2011.

Users are encouraged to conduct a wear trial and develop user findings and reccomendations whendealing with work clothing elements that make claims to provide moisture management. Moisturemanagement clothing can also be described as wicking, active transport, or similar descriptive terms thatimply the comfort to the wearer and moving sweat away from the body. The authority having jurisdictionshould be aware that it can be difficult to objectively quantify findings or such claims. User perception ofcomfort should be considered over such claims of moisture management.




Street Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Sun Feb 17 15:36:49 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Since moisture management has been deleted from the document, this will serve to provide a userevaluation statement to evaluate claims of moisture management properties at the organization oruser level. The technical committee plans to address moisture management during the nextrevision cycle.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


155 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



156 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 60-NFPA 1975-2013 [ New Section after A.1.3.6 ]

A.2.3.5

A copy of this document may be obtained by forwarding a request to: US Army Natick Research,Development and Engineering Center, Attn: RDNS-WPW-C, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760-5019.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The technical committee is providing this information on the availability and acquisition ofthis document.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



157 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



158 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


A.3.3.9 Flame Resistance (Protective Apparel) .

Flame resistance can be an inherent property of the textile material, or it can be imparted by specifictreatment. Flame resistance can be an inherent property of the textile material, or it can be imparted byspecific treatment.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The text in parenthesis does not appear in the term in the body of the standard thus should notappear in the Annex, this was incorrectly captured in the first revision and fixes the editorial error.

ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 90-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. A.3.3.9]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.


159 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



160 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 39-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Section No. A.5.2.7(3) ]

A.5.2.6(3) To avoid possible damage to the garment and possible reduction and loss of inherent or treated flameresistance characteristics of the garment, the manufacturer should be contacted prior to disinfecting orcleaning the garment by a method not prescribed on the product. Station/work uniforms Work apparelshould not be cleaned in home washing machines. See 5.1.7 and 5.2.6 5.2.6 for information regardinghow to identify the manufacturer and the garment.

For information on the prevention and transmission of communicable diseases and carcinogens causedby contaminated garments, see NFPA 1581, Standard on Fire Department Infection Control Program, andOSHA regulation 29 CFR 1910.1030, or consult the Centers for Disease Control, the local board of publichealth, the American Medical Association, the U.S. Fire Administration, the Environmental ProtectionAgency, or the International Association of Fire Fighters.





Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Reference correction and terminology change.

Response Message:Public Comment No. 91-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. A.5.2.7(3)]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.


161 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



162 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 58-NFPA 1975-2013 [ New Section after A.7.5 ]

A.7.5

It is important that users understand that insect repellency is a finish or treatment and that performanceor bite protection is likely to decline over time and after laundering.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Add explanatory information about the decrease of bite protection after repeat launderingand use. Change

Response Message:Public Comment No. 60-NFPA 1975-2012 [New Section after A.7.5]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.


163 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



164 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 57-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Section No. A.7.5 ]

A.7.2

Two separate test requirements are provided for manufacturers who wish to claim use of flame resistanttextile fabrics in their manufacture of station/work uniforms work apparel . When the requirements found in7.2 7.2.2 , 7.5.1 , and 7.5.2 are met, additional label language is used to indicate that the garments areflame resistant.

A.7.4


For the purpose of this standard, water resistance is defined as “a finish or inherent property [of afabric] that limits the absorption of water.” Water resistance may also encompass other propertiesincluding water repellency and water penetration resistance. These additional test properties can beapplied if other types of water resistance are required or desired for the specific uniform work apparelitem under consideration.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Reference correction to reflect changes made to Chapter 7. The new Annex item A.7.4 clarifiesthe use of the water resistance test and what it is intended to represent in this revision of thedocument.

ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 92-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. A.7.5]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


165 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



166 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 40-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Section No. B.2.1 ]


The test method appears in Section 8.3, Method 1.A modified form of ASTM D 751, Standard TestMethods for Coated Fabrics, is used. . Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135, DimensionalChanges of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, (Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V, DryingProcedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes onDry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method.





Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Editorial corrections of revisions made in first revision draft.

Response Message:Public Comment No. 93-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. B.2.1]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.


167 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



168 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 69-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Section No. B.3.1 ]


The test method appears in Section 8.4 and uses ASTM D 1683/D 1683M, Standard Test Method forFailure in Sewn Seams of Woven Apparel Fabrics, for woven fabrics or ASTM D 3940, Standard TestMethod for Bursting Strength (load) and Elongation of Sewn Seams of Knit or Woven Stretch TextileFabrics ASTM D 6797, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength of Fabrics Constant Rate ofExtension (CRE) Ball Burst Test for knit fabrics.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revisions to Annex B are necessary to reflect public input modifications made toChapters 7 and 8.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.


169 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



170 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 78-NFPA 1975-2013 [ New Section after B.3.2 ]

B.3.3 Application of the Test Method.

The purpose of this test is to require a minimum seam strength of 133 N (30 lb) for seams used instress areas of the garment.




Street Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Tue Feb 26 08:26:01 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

No application of this test has been provided which is inconsistent with the other test methodsdescribed in Annex B. A conversion change was made to 30 lb.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.


171 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



172 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 42-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Section No. B.7 ]

B.7 Optional Moisture Management.

B.7.1

The test method appears in Section 8.10; AATCC Test Method 195, Liquid Moisture ManagementProperties of Textile Fabrics, is used. Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135, DimensionalChanges of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, -(Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V,Drying Procedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158, Dimensional Changeson Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method .


The liquid moisture management properties of a textile are evaluated by placing a fabric specimenbetween two horizontal (upper and lower) electrical sensors each with seven concentric pins. Apredetermined amount of test solution that aids the measurement of electrical conductivity changesare dropped onto the center of the upward-facing test specimen surface. The test solution is free tomove in three directions: radial spreading on the top surface, movement through the specimen fromtop surface to the bottom surface, and radial spreading on the bottom surface of the specimen. Duringthe test, changes in electrical resistance of specimen are measured and recorded. The electricalresistance readings are used to calculate fabric liquid moisture content changes that quantify dynamicliquid moisture transport behaviors in multiple directions of the specimen. The summary of themeasured results are used to grade the liquid moisture management properties of a fabric by usingpredetermined indices.


The purpose of this test is for the measurement, evaluation, and classification of liquid moisturemanagement properties of textile fabrics. The test method produces objective measurements of liquidmoisture management properties of knitted, woven, and nonwoven textile fabrics. The resultsobtained with this test method are based on water resistance, water repellency, and water absorptioncharacteristics of the fabric structure, including the fabric's geometric and internal structure and thewicking characteristics of its fibers and yarns. The overall (liquid) moisture management capability(OMMC) is an index of the overall capability of a fabric to transport liquid moisture as calculated bycombining three measured attributes of performance: the liquid moisture absorption rate on thebottom surface (ARB), the one-way liquid transport capability (R), and the maximum liquid moisturespreading speed on the bottom surface (SSB).





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:



173 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 52-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. B.7]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



174 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


B.8 Optional Wicking Performance.


The test method appears in Section 8.8. Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135, DimensionalChanges of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, (Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V,Drying Procedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158, Dimensional Changeson Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method .


A 25 mm × 152 mm (1 in. × 6 in.) material specimen is suspended in a flask filled with colored water.The wicking is evaluated both before and after 25 wash/dry cycles or dry-cleaning cycles, whicheverpractice is specified for the material. After 1 minute, 3 minutes, 5 minutes, and every 5 minutesthereafter, up to 1 hour, the amount of wicking of the colored water up the fabric specimen ismeasured.


This test is used to quantify the wicking performance properties of the fabric.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:


Response Message:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.

Affirmative All


175 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Allen, Jason L.

Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



176 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


B.9 Optional Air Permeability.


The test method appears in Section 8.13, ASTM D 737, Standard Test Method for Air Permeability ofTextile Fabrics is used. Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes ofFabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, (Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V, DryingProcedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes onDry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method .


Material specimens are evaluated after 25 wash/dry cycles or dry-cleaning cycles, whichever practiceis specified for the material. The material is placed in the test device, and the rate of airflow passingperpendicularly through a known area of fabric is measured. From the rate of airflow, air permeabilityis determined.


This test is used to quantify the air permeability properties of the fabric.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:


ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 64-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. B.9]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


177 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



178 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


B.7 Optional Odor Control Resistance .


Test method appears in Section 8.9, AATCC Test Method 100, Assessment of Antibacterial Finishes onTextile Materials; and ASTM Test Method E 2149, Standard Test Method for Determining theAntimicrobial Activity of Immobilized Antimicrobial Agents Under Dynamic Contact Conditions are used.Conditioning is by laundering per AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic HomeLaundering, (Machine Cycle 1, Wash Temperature V, Drying Procedure Ai) or dry-cleaning per Sections9.2 and 9.3 of AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: MachineMethod.


Material specimens having antibacterial finishes are exposed to a known concentration of odor-causingbacteria for a specified period of time. The concentration of the bacteria is evaluated both before andafter exposure to the materials. The test method requires a 99.9 percent reduction in the bacteriaconcentration.


The purpose of this test is to provide a quantitative procedure for the evaluation of the degree ofantibacterial activity. Two test methods are cited, and each is specific to the means of bacteriologicalcontrol. The test methods are similar in their evaluation—the difference is in the exposure to the sampleto the bacteria challenge. The AATCC method uses a static exposure that is appropriate for non-bondedor leaching type of technologies, and the ASTM method uses a dynamic exposure that is appropriate forbonded or non-leaching technologies. Both test methods expose the materials to the same odor-causingbacteria.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:


Response Message:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


179 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



180 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 72-NFPA 1975-2013 [ New Section after B.11.3 ]

B.9 Insect Repellency.


This test method appears in section 4.5.1 of Department of Defense GL/PD 07-13C PurchaseDescription Coat, Army Combat Uniform . Conditioning is by laundering 20 cycles per AATCC 135(Machine Cycle 3, Wash Temperature V, Drying Procedure Aiii).


Samples are taken from garments or yardage and evaluated for the mass of permethrin per areausing chemical extraction and analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Thisanalysis is done on both as received samples and on samples that have been laundered for 20 washand dry cycles.


The purpose of this test is measure the amount of permethrin in the material. The amount must bewithin the specified range to ensure effectiveness and be within acceptable limits.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:


Response Message:

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.



181 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



182 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 44-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Section No. C.1.2.1 ]

C.1.2.1 AATCC Publications.

American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, P.O. Box 12215, Research Triangle Park, NC27709.



AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, 2004.

AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method, 2005.






Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

A task group established by the technical committee was asked to establish performancerequirements of fabrics that make claims that the garment controls moisture by various fabric designsor inherent property. Further research has determined that quantifying a moisture management fabricor garment is a complicated matter. Testing apparatus and test methods available to the industry mayindicate false positive or negative findings and do not accurately represent or duplicate the impliedcomfort or moisture management properties of a given garment. NFPA 1975 is a safety standard andshould not attempt to quantify claims of moisture management of a manufacturer. The technicalcommittee therefore recommends that all moisture management requirements and references bestricken from the document.

ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 53-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. C.1.2.1]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention



183 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



184 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Second Revision No. 45-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Section No. C.1.2.2 ]

C.1.2.2 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D 737, Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics , 2008


ASTM D 1683/D 1683M, Standard Test Method for Failure in Sewn Seams of Woven Apparel Fabrics,2011a.

ASTM D 3940, Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength (Load) and Elongation of Sewn Seams ofKnit or Woven Stretch Textile Fabrics , 1983 (withdrawn 1995).

ASTM D 6413, Flame Resistance of Textiles (Vertical Test), 2011a.

ASTM D 6797 , Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength of Fabrics Constant Rate of Extension(CRE) Ball Burst Test , 2007 (2011).

ASTM F 1731, Standard Practice for Body Measurement and Sizing of Fire and Rescue ServicesUniforms and Other Thermal Hazard Protective Clothing, 1996 (2008).

ASTM F 1939, Standard Test Method for Radiant Heat Protective Performance of Flame ResistantClothing Materials , 2008.

ASTM E 2149, Standard Test Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of ImmobilizedAntimicrobial Agents Under Dynamic Contact Conditions, 2010.

ASTM F 2894, Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing and Equipment forHeat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven , 2012.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

References were revised, deleted, updated or added to Annex C to comply with referencesfound elsewhere in the Annexes.

ResponseMessage:Public Comment No. 65-NFPA 1975-2012 [Section No. C.1.2.2]

Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



185 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM


0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Dunn, Charles S.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Metz, Jeremy

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean



186 of 186 6/4/2014 2:18 PM

Committee Comment No. 20-NFPA 1975-2013 [ Section No. 6.1.5 ]

This was a Second Revision that has been modified or deleted as the result of SecondCorrelating Revision: SCR-7-NFPA 1975-2013

6.1.4

Where work apparel garments are constructed from flame-resistant textiles, the garments shall be stitchedwith thread of an inherently flame-resistant fiber.





Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This design requiment is redundant to the Thread Heat Resistance test. If threads meet theperformance requirement, the fiber composition should not be relevant. This requirement alsoprohibits the use of non-inherently flame resistant threads that would be acceptable for theseproducts.


Ballot Results


24 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Hock, Tricia L.

Reall, Jack E.


Arrington, Joseph

Corrado, Steven D.

Cox, Dean W.


1 of 2 6/4/2014 2:12 PM

Dacey, Paul

Davis, Shawn G.

Dempsey, Keith B.

Frank, James A.



Hess, Diane B.

Horn, Gavin P.

Howard, Thomas

Hudson, Steve


Lehtonen, Karen E.

Nelson, Robert G.

Paderick, H. Dean


Negative with CommentDunn, Charles S.

The design requirement for flame resistant thread is not redundant with the heat resistance test. The heat resistancetest is to determine if a material melts, drips or shrinks excessively. A thread may still burn if it passes the heatresistance thread. If a firefighter purchases a flame resistant garment I believe that they should have the expectationthat the garment will maintain its integrety even if the stitching is exposed to a direct flame. An inherently flameresistant sewing thread will do this. A thread which pases the flame resistance test may or may not remain intact afterexposure to a flame.

Metz, Jeremy

Subject matter experts were consulted after the TC meeting and indicate that inherently fire resistant threads shouldbe utilized in the design and construction of FR garments. The result of removing the inherent FR thread from thestandard may result in a compromised garment that may not adequately protect a fire fighter during a thermal event.The TC should consider further researching the impact of removing this performance criteria and possibly submit aTIA to resolve this unintended safety consequence.


2 of 2 6/4/2014 2:12 PM


1.1.4


This standard shall also specify optional requirements for flame resistance, moisture management, odorresistance, water resistance, and insect repellancy, and visibility markings where such options are specifiedor claimed to be used in construction of station/ work apparel uniforms .





Committee Statement and Meeting Notes

CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee is correcting an error under its authority as specified in paragraph 3.4.2 ofthe Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards. Visibility markings are notaddressed as optional requirements in this standard.

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

10 Not Returned

17 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


Beck, Eric J.

Duffy, Richard M.

Fargo, Cristine Z.

Johnson, James S.

Legendre, Jeff

Neilson, Gary L.


Reall, Jack E.

Tomlinson, Tim W.


Arrington, Joseph

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...

1 of 2 6/4/2014 2:14 PM

Corrado, Steven D.

Freese, Robert A.



Haston, David V.

Hosea, Thomas M.

Lehtonen, Karen E.

Matthews, David G.

McKenna, Michael F.

Sanders, Stephen R.

Stull, Jeffrey O.


Varner, Bruce H.

Winer, Harry P.

Young, Richard H.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...

2 of 2 6/4/2014 2:14 PM