1
Preparing for Artemis - GMRO The Artemis program intends to land the first woman and next man at the south pole of the moon by 2024. The Granular Mechanics and Regolith Operations (GMRO) lab has been working on understanding the physics and behavior of lunar dust. Specifically, we have an interest in both understanding the dust generated by landing plumes and finding ways to mitigate that dust to prevent damage to surface systems, orbital infrastructure, and the Apollo Heritage Sites. Reimpacting Dust It was found that dust that reimpacts the surface after completing at least one orbit does so preferentially close to the landing site (below, left), with a chance of reimpact following a power law (below, right). Results & Future Work After running many simulations, it became clear that the risk of damage to the Gateway was negligible, with only ~18 particles for any give 1000 cubic kilometers during the first perilune passage after a south pole landing. However, the frequency of reimpacts near the landing site was considerable and depends on the mass of the lander as follows: Ejecta and Dust in Orbit The slice plots represent domes of constant velocity, where each slice maps the surface of a hemisphere of debris trajectories at a given velocity to their corresponding destination. Prior work has shown that a significant amount of debris may end up in orbit, depending on initial conditions Charged Lunar Environment The lunar environment experiences electromagnetic forces from a variety of sources. Constraining all of these forces proved to be difficult due to the dynamic nature of the problem. This problem was simplified by assuming a constant solar flux and Earth magnetotail. Particles were assumed to have a charge of 1 μC·m^-2. The charge dynamics in this simulation include: Core Assumptions The following assumptions were made in order to constrain and simplify the problem: The moon is approximated as an oblate spheroid with no surface features Considered only Sun, Earth, and Moon gravity. Particles are approximated as spheres with uniform density Particle density was approximated as 1500 kg ·m^-3 Particle collisions were not considered Initial Conditions Based on data obtained from Apollo and Surveyor missions in addition to CFD work performed both at KSC and UCF, the initial conditions of the particles were constrained to between 1 and 3 degrees above the horizontal at the impingement point and a velocity range of between 1.5 and 2.7 km/s. The Challenges of Lunar Dust Unlike dust on Earth, lunar dust is especially fine and abrasive. Without an atmosphere to slow it down, dust can be accelerated to extremely high speeds both from impacts and lunar landing plumes. By combining observations of displaced regolith from Apollo and Surveyor landers with CFD simulations, we are able to mathematically describe the behavior of the dust both in terms of velocity and volume. Furthermore, the distribution of velocities can befitted to size distributions to determine the amount of mass displaced as a function of velocity, the particle size distribution of that mass, and the ultimate destination of those particles. With that completed, the next steps are to analyze the impact of this high-velocity dust and increase the fidelity of the simulations. Finally, plans exist to deploy instruments to the surface to better understand an characterize this behavior. Understanding the Impact of High-Velocity Dust Due to Lunar Landings Matthew Wittal 1 , Doug Fontes 2 , Bruce Vu 1 , James Mantovani 1 , Phil Metzger 2 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration , 2 University of Central Florida FreeFlyer Simulation The software used for this simulation was a.i. Solutions’ FreeFlyer. Each simulation included over 20,000 particles grouped in a formation. The purple particles are in shadow, and the red circle indicates some particles that have entered into a temporary orbit. Particle charges Surface charge Solar wind Earth’s magnetotail These charges vary over time and space, making study of these phenomena and their interaction with dust challenging. Calculating Mass & Velocity Building on the work of Housen & Holsapple (2011), Lane & Metzger (2016), and Metzger (2020), three parameters were combined to provide a global estimate of displaced mass as a function of lander mass, particle size as a function of velocity, and total Mass exceeding a given velocity. Given these metrics, Wittal et al (2020) was able to determine the number and size of dust particles estimated to be found at any given position and time following a lunar landing. Apollo 11 Heritage Site Assuming a featureless surface, there exists no point on the moon which would completely eliminate all impacts at the Apollo 11 site. However, because most dust is constrained as described above, it was found that the vast majority of dust does not reimpact near the Apollo 11 site when landing near the south pole. based on simulation data. is the lander mass and r is the distance from the landing site. For example, as many as 8 impacts per sq. km. should be expected 1km away from the landing sight for a 40t Artemis lander. More details & animation at: https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=lV-gWDzNWew&t=14s

New Understanding the Impact of High-Velocity Dust Due to Lunar …lsic.jhuapl.edu/uploadedDocs/posters/464-Poster PDF_43... · 2020. 10. 14. · Apollo 11 Heritage Site Assuming

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: New Understanding the Impact of High-Velocity Dust Due to Lunar …lsic.jhuapl.edu/uploadedDocs/posters/464-Poster PDF_43... · 2020. 10. 14. · Apollo 11 Heritage Site Assuming

Preparing for Artemis - GMROThe Artemis program intends to land the first womanand next man at the south pole of the moon by 2024.The Granular Mechanics and Regolith Operations(GMRO) lab has been working on understanding thephysics and behavior of lunar dust. Specifically, we havean interest in both understanding the dust generated bylanding plumes and finding ways to mitigate that dust toprevent damage to surface systems, orbitalinfrastructure, and the Apollo Heritage Sites.

Reimpacting DustIt was found that dust that reimpacts thesurface after completing at least one orbitdoes so preferentially close to the landing site(below, left), with a chance of reimpactfollowing a power law (below, right).

Results & Future WorkAfter running many simulations, itbecame clear that the risk ofdamage to the Gateway wasnegligible, with only ~18 particlesfor any give 1000 cubic kilometersduring the first perilune passageafter a south pole landing.However, the frequency ofreimpacts near the landing site wasconsiderable and depends on themass of the lander as follows:

Ejecta and Dust in OrbitThe slice plots represent domes ofconstant velocity, where each slicemaps the surface of a hemisphere ofdebris trajectories at a given velocityto their corresponding destination.Prior work has shown that asignificant amount of debris mayend up in orbit, depending on initialconditions

Charged Lunar EnvironmentThe lunar environment experienceselectromagnetic forces from a variety ofsources. Constraining all of these forcesproved to be difficult due to the dynamicnature of the problem. This problem wassimplified by assuming a constant solar fluxand Earth magnetotail. Particles wereassumed to have a charge of 1 µC·m^-2.The charge dynamics in this simulationinclude:

Core AssumptionsThe following assumptions were made in order to constrain and simplify the problem:• The moon is approximated as an oblate

spheroid with no surface features• Considered only Sun, Earth, and Moon

gravity.• Particles are approximated as spheres with

uniform density• Particle density was approximated as 1500

kg ·m^-3• Particle collisions were not considered

Initial ConditionsBased on data obtained fromApollo and Surveyor missions in addition to CFD work performed both at KSC and UCF, the initial conditions of the particles were constrained to between 1 and 3 degrees above the horizontal at the impingement point and a velocity range of between 1.5 and 2.7 km/s.

The Challenges of Lunar DustUnlike dust on Earth, lunar dust is especially fine andabrasive. Without an atmosphere to slow it down, dustcan be accelerated to extremely high speeds both fromimpacts and lunar landing plumes. By combiningobservations of displaced regolith from Apollo andSurveyor landers with CFD simulations, we are able tomathematically describe the behavior of the dust bothin terms of velocity and volume. Furthermore, thedistribution of velocities can befitted to sizedistributions to determine the amount of massdisplaced as a function of velocity, the particle sizedistribution of that mass, and the ultimate destinationof those particles. With that completed, the next stepsare to analyze the impact of this high-velocity dust andincrease the fidelity of the simulations. Finally, plansexist to deploy instruments to the surface to betterunderstand an characterize this behavior.

Understanding the Impact of High-Velocity Dust Due to Lunar Landings

Matthew Wittal 1, Doug Fontes2 , Bruce Vu1, James Mantovani1, Phil Metzger2

1National Aeronautics and Space Administration , 2University of Central Florida

FreeFlyer SimulationThe software used for this simulation was a.i.Solutions’ FreeFlyer. Each simulation included over 20,000 particles grouped in a formation. The purple particles are in shadow, and the red circle indicates some particles that have entered into a temporary orbit.

• Particle charges• Surface charge• Solar wind• Earth’s

magnetotailThese charges varyover time and space, making study of these phenomena and their interaction with dust challenging.

Calculating Mass & VelocityBuilding on the work of Housen & Holsapple(2011), Lane & Metzger (2016), and Metzger(2020), three parameters were combined toprovide a global estimate of displaced mass as afunction of lander mass, particle size as a functionof velocity, and total Mass exceeding a givenvelocity. Given these metrics, Wittal et al (2020)was able to determine the number and size ofdust particles estimated to be found at any givenposition and time following a lunar landing.

Apollo 11 Heritage SiteAssuming a featureless surface, there exists no point on the moon which would completely eliminate all impacts at the Apollo 11 site. However, because most dust is constrained as described above, it was found that the vast majority of dust does not reimpact near the Apollo 11 site when landing near the south pole.

based on simulation data. is the lander mass and r is the distance from the landing site. For example, as many as 8 impacts per sq. km. should be expected 1km awayfrom the landingsight for a 40tArtemis lander.

More details & animation at:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lV-gWDzNWew&t=14s