45
ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

ND Topical CallSubgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2)

September 9, 2015

Page 2: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

2

Agenda

1. Subgrantee Monitoring Topical Call Series Overview

2. Video Discussion: Conditions for Learning in DC’s Juvenile Justice System

3. The Conditions for Learning

4. Sample Tools for Assessing Conditions for Learning

5. Video Discussion: The Unique Challenges and Conditions Faced by Teachers in Correctional Settings

6. “Red Flags”

7. Activity: Adapting CFL Assessment Tools

8. Federal Guiding Principles

9. Case Study: Equal Access to Services

10. Resources

Page 3: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

3

Series Overview

Develop familiarity with subgrantee monitoring tools

Practice administering the tools using fictional data, scenarios and videos of classroom practice

Practice analyzing the data collected by the tools

Discuss how to adapt the tool to local contexts

Page 4: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

4

Series Overview: Call 1

Meeting Civil Rights Obligations (Activity: Program Performance Data) Teacher equity

College and career readiness

School discipline

Page 5: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

5

DISCUSSION

What do you hope to get out of today’s call?

Page 6: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

6

VIDEODC’s Juvenile Justice System (Clip 1)

Page 7: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

7

Discussion

Did this video resonate with you?

What key concerns did you see in this video?

Page 8: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

8

POLLWhat are the conditions for learning?

Page 9: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

9

Conditions for Learning

SafetySupportSocial Emotional LearningEngagement and Challenge

Page 10: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

10

Discussion

How would you characterize the conditions for learning in your Title I, Part D facilities funded in your State? What concerns do you have in terms of:

safety?

support?

social emotional learning?

engagement and challenge?

Page 11: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

11

VIDEODC’s Juvenile Justice System (Clip 2)

Page 12: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

12

Discussion

What positive changes did you see in the video in terms of:

Safety?

Support?

Social Emotional Learning?

Engagement and Challenge?

Page 13: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

13

POLL

What tools are you using to assess CFL in your facilities?

Page 14: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

14Sample Tools for Assessing Conditions for Learning

Performance Based Standards

Page 15: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

15

Performance Based Standards (PbS)

Launched by Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Programs in 1995 and promoted by Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators

PbS system offers goals, standards, tools, resources on best practices and reports to help facilities, programs and agencies

meet PbS Standards

measure progress overtime and in comparison to others

PbS is guided by two principles:

o You cannot change or improve what you don’t measure

o Data is information with a purpose to create change and reform

Page 16: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

16

PbS Education Standards

Quantitative indicators for youth who have been confined for six months or more:

Percent of youths whose math scores increased between admission and discharge

Percent of youths whose reading scores increased between admission and discharge

Percent of youths whose records indicate they have received a math test at admission

Percent of youths whose records indicate they have received a reading test at admission

Percent of youths whose records indicate that they have received the educational programming prescribed by their individual treatment plans

Page 17: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

17

PbS (Cont’d)

From Youth Climate Survey report:o The number of youth who perceive the school program as

good

o The number of youth out of those surveyed who have been attending school

From Staff Climate Survey:o The number of staff who perceive the school program as

good

o Staff rating of the education program

Page 18: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

18

PbS (Cont’d)

Qualitative indicators:

IEPs are maintained in the youth’s educational record

The education program is maintained 12 months a year for the number of hours specified by state law; school calendars/ schedules are posted throughout the facility

The education records of youths confined for more than 14 days include education records from their most recent school

Youths held in room confinement / isolation receive education programming and materials

The facility uses aggregate and summary education data to develop a plan to improve education

Education classes are held as scheduled

Page 19: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

19Sample Tools for Assessing Conditions for Learning

Some of the most common, research-based tools for monitoring and evaluating instruction are not typically created for juvenile justice settings in which teachers face unique challenges:

AIR Conditions for Learning Surveys

National Clearinghouse on Supportive School Discipline (NCSSD) CFL School Audit Checklist

Page 20: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

20

VIDEOJuvenile Hall

Page 21: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

21

POLL

What unique challenges or conditions do teachers in correctional settings face?

Page 22: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

22

Students Using “Packets”

Photocopies of out-of-date workbook pages,

Word Searches and

Crossword puzzles.

 

Page 23: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

23Limited Evidence of Parent Involvement

School Open Houses

Monthly Parent Meetings

Frequent phone calls and visits

Reentry Planning

Page 24: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

24

Time Away from the Classroom

Poor behavior resulting in segregation

No education services while segregated

No attention to planning evidenced-based behavior interventions

Page 25: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

25

504, IEP & ELL Accommodations

Teacher is unfamiliar with individual student accommodations

Teacher is unable to identify students with accommodations or plans

Teacher refuses to utilize certain accommodations

List of accommodations and/or notice of accommodations not provided to teachers

Page 26: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

26

Behavior Plans & Classroom Routines

Classroom routines and rules not established

Classroom routines and rules not consistently followed

Behavioral interventions not employed

Classroom structure contributes to negative student behavior

Page 27: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

27

Course Standards

Teacher not aware of course pacing

Teacher not aware of course standards and objectives

Teacher refuses to follow course standards

Teacher preference directs instruction

Page 28: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

28

ACTIVITYAdapt the NCSSD CFL Audit Tool

Page 29: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

29

Adapt the NCSSD CFL Audit Tool

Subdomain 4.2: Academic Challenge

Students are offered explicit instruction in study skills

Students have the access and opportunity to take college preparatory coursework

We have clearly stated goals for academic achievement

We have academic goals that are linked with systemwide and community academic expectations

We have a means for ensuring that students know what the academic expectations are

Page 30: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

30

Adapt the NCSSD CFL Audit Tool (Cont’d)

Instructional staff understanding and support of these expectations are reflected in: lessons plans

student assignments

formative assessments

samples of student work

Instructional staff are provided ongoing, training and resources that are aligned with academic expectations

Page 31: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

31

Adapt the NCSSD CFL Audit Tool (Cont’d)

Academic goals are coordinated across grade levels and subject areas

The learning environment is differentiated so that ALL students have the opportunity to meet academic expectations

We systematically assess and monitor student progress on these academic goals

Academic supports and interventions are accessible to students who are struggling to meet expectations

Page 32: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

32

FEDERAL GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Page 33: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

33

CASE STUDY

Page 34: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

34

Case Study

Due to a recent accounting scandal involving several privately run juvenile correctional facilities in your state, the Department of the Corrections has elected to temporarily close two facilities including the state’s only girls’ prison. The director of the DOC decides to move the girls to a nearby boys’ facility but due to safety and security concerns, will not allow the girls to attend school in the facility’s classrooms. The local school district agrees to oversee and staff an attendance center for the girls in a mobile unit. The girls would receive packets prepared by and graded by the teachers in the boys’ prison. There would be an onsite administrator who is not licensed to teach in the state but has an administrative endorsement. The school district will supply a special education teacher with multiple endorsements on an as-needed basis. Diplomas would be issued by the boy’s prison high school.

Page 35: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

35

POLLAcceptable or unacceptable?

Page 36: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

36

Case Study

2014 Dear Colleague Letter on the Civil Rights of Students in Juvenile Justice Residential Facilities: Civil rights obligations of facilities include providing equal access to academic coursework and career and technical education, including equal opportunities for male and female students in single-sex settings

2007 Dear Colleague Letter on nonvocational single-sex classes and extracurricular activities: The regulations require that recipients of Federal funding provide to all students, including the students excluded from the single-sex class or extracurricular activity on the basis of sex, a substantially equal single-sex class or extracurricular activity in the same subject or activity.

Page 37: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

37

Case Study

Office for Civil Rights

Federal civil rights enforcement agency housed by U.S. Department of Education

Mission is to ensure equal access to education and to promote educational excellence through vigorous enforcement of civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, and age

Page 38: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

38

Case Study

Has jurisdiction over programs and activities that receive financial assistance from the Department of Education such as: State education agencies

Elementary and secondary school systems

Colleges and universities

State vocational rehabilitation agencies

Juvenile justice facilities

Page 39: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

39

Case Study

Receives complaints from parents, students or advocates, conducts agency initiated compliance reviews, and provides technical assistance to school districts, parents or advocates

Investigates and resolves complaints of discrimination related to: Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973

Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

Page 40: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

40

Case Study

Provides technical assistance to help institutions, parents and students understand their rights and responsibilities: Presentations

Responses to telephone and written inquiries

Workshops

Consultations

Page 41: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

41

SAMPLE SUBGRANTEE MONITORING TOOL

LA Quality Assurance Plan

Page 42: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

42

DISCUSSION

What are the strengths and weaknesses of your tools having explored this content?

Page 43: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

43

QUESTIONS?

Page 45: ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015

45

Parting Questions

What needs have not been addressed by this call series that NDTAC could address in the future?

Are the call recap documents helpful?