27
National Center for Statistics & Analysis 1 Use of Data Collected by the National Center for Statistics and Analysis Tuesday, March 28, 2006 Presented by: Joseph S. Carra, Associate Administrator, NCSA

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 1 Use of Data Collected by the National Center for Statistics and Analysis Tuesday, March 28, 2006 Presented

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 1

Use of Data Collected by the National Center for Statistics

and Analysis

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

Presented by: Joseph S. Carra, Associate Administrator, NCSA

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 2

Examples

1. Nopus and Seatbelt Use2. Electronic Stability Control3. FARS and Geospatial Coding

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 3

Nopus and Seatbelt Use

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 4

A Primary Use of Traffic Safety Data

One way that we use data is to:

• determine a safety countermeasure, and

• after implementation of the countermeasure, assess its effectiveness

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 5

An Example

One of NHTSA’s priorities is to increase safety belt use.

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 6

Using Data to Identify a Countermeasure

Historically, belt use has been lower than average in rural communities, and among pickup occupants:

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 7

Identify Countermeasure, Continued

80%

76%70%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pickup Trucks Rural Areas Nationwide

2004

Belt

Use

Safety Belt Use in 2004

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 8

Implementing the Countermeasure

In 2005, NHTSA chose to focus its Click It or Ticket belt campaign on these two areas – rural areas and pickup occupants:

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 9

Analyzing Countermeasure Effectiveness

76%70%

79%73%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pickup Trucks Rural Areas

2004 2005

Belt

Use STATISTICALLY

SIGNIFICANTINCREASE

STATISTICALLYSIGNIFICANT

INCREASE

The countermeasure was a success!

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 10

Electronic Stability Control

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 11

Analyzing effectiveness of emerging technology and quickly

disseminating results leads to appropriate market response.

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 12

How does ESC function?

Anticipates dangerous situations Automatically intervenes Brakes one wheel Corrects over steer and under steer Prevents skids, spins Reduces situations leading to run-

off-road and rollovers

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 13

Databases: ESC

FARS, 1997-2003 NCSA State Data

Florida, 1997-2002 Illinois, 1997-2002Maryland, 1997-2002Missouri, 1997-2002Utah, 1997-2002

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 14

Data Sample: ESC

Passenger Cars• Mercedes-Benz and BMW models – 61 percent• Luxury GM models – 23 percent• Models from other manufacturers (Acura,

Audi, Lexus, and VW) – 16 percent

SUVs• Mercedes-Benz models (ML320, ML350,

ML430, ML500, G500, G55 AMG) – 22 percent• Toyota models (4Runner, Land Cruiser) – 41

percent• Lexus models (RX300, LX470) – 37 percent

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 15

Analysis Method: ESC

Compute ratios of single vehicle crash involvements (excluding pedestrians, bicycles, animals) to multi-vehicle crash involvements (control group).

Compute percentage reductions in these ratios in vehicles with ESC vs. vehicles of the same make-models without ESC.

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 16

2004 ESC Effectiveness Results

In the US, it is estimated that stability control could save 7,000 lives per year.

Passenger Cars

Sport Utility

Vehicles

Fatal single vehicle crash

reduction30% 63%

All single vehicle crash reduction 35% 67%

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 17

Resulting Actions

2004-2006, research leading to rulemaking In 2005, 20% of new vehicles had ESC as

opposed to 10% in 2004. General Motors has announced that by the year

2010, ESC will be standard equipment on all vehicles made.

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 18

GIS Data within FARS

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 19

The addition of new data element to an existing data system adds a whole new

dimension to the use of the data systems.

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 20

FARS

Congressional Districts

School Districts

Air Medical Services Fly Zones

Which School Districts have high fatal crash incidents?

What are crash rates for Congressional districts?

Is there a significant relationship between survivorship and distance to EMS centers?

And, a countless number of other traffic safety questions...

Primary users of this system are traffic engineers…It is used to identify roadway, signage, design and or traffic signal problems.

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 21

US Census Dept Spatial Data

http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/metadata.html

Alaska Native Regional CorporationsAmerican Indian Areas/Alaska Native Areas/Hawaiian Home

LandsCensus Block GroupsCensus DivisionsCensus RegionsCensus TractsCongressional DistrictsConsolidated CitiesCounty and County Equivalent AreasCounty SubdivisionsIncorporated Places/Census Designated PlacesMetropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical AreasNew England County Metropolitan AreaNew England City and Town AreasOregon Urban Growth AreasPublic Use Microdata AreasSchool Districts – Elementary, Secondary, UnifiedState and State Equivalent AreasState Legislative DistrictsTraffic Analysis ZonesTribal Block Groups/Tribal Census Tracts Urban AreasVoting Districts ZIP Code Tabulation Areas

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 22

FARS GIS Reporting

Year Lat-Long Entered Total Cases Entered % Lat-Long Entered

2001 30,901 37,862 81.6%

2002 35,455 38,491 92.1%

2003 35,710 38,447 92.9%

2004(*) 34,746 38,443 90.1%

2005(*) 29,663 33,423 88.7%

(*) Denotes active date entry.

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 23

Geocoding Crash Locations

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 24

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 25

#1

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 26

National Center for Statistics & Analysis 27

Massachusetts Regional Planning Agencies