Moore's Federal Practice - LexisNexis...for realigning parties must have existed when the suit was ®led. See Ch. 102, Diversity Jurisdiction , 102.16[2][c]. Federal Question Jurisdiction

PUBLICATION UPDATE

Route to: M M M M

M M M M

Moore’s Federal Practice®

Publication 410 Release 202 June 2019

HIGHLIGHTS

Analysis of Latest CaseLaw—Civil and Appellate

• This release features analysis ofthe latest case law pertaining tofederal civil and appellate practice.See Volumes 1–21.

Special Alert—Supreme CourtRule Amendments Adopted

• On April 18, 2019, the U.S. Su-preme Court adopted amendmentsto its Rules 9, 14, 15, 25, 29, 33,and 48, effective July 1, 2019. SeeSpecial Alerts accompanyingChapters 500, 509, 514, 515, 525,529, 533, and 548. Analysis ofthese amendments will be incorpo-rated into the chapters in Release203.

Special Alerts—Late-BreakingSupreme Court Cases

• Special alerts in this release offeranalysis of late-breaking U.S. Su-preme Court cases. See below fordetails.

Release 202 of Moore’s Federal Practice

features analysis of the latest case law

pertaining to federal civil and appellate

practice, including the following:

Special Alerts—Late-Breaking Su-

preme Court Cases. The following Spe-

cial Alerts discuss the most recent Supreme

Court cases; analysis of these cases will be

incorporated throughout the chapters in

Release 203:

Republic of Sudan v. Harrison, 587 U.S.

—, 139 S. Ct. 1048, 203 L. Ed. 2d 433,

2019 U.S. LEXIS 2293 (Mar. 26, 2019).

See Special Alerts accompanying Chapters

4 and 104.

Frank v. Gaos, 586 U.S. —, 139 S. Ct.

1041, 203 L. Ed. 2d 404, 2019 U.S. LEXIS

2089 (Mar. 20, 2019) (per curiam). See

Chapter 101.

Jurisdictional Prerequisites. In Staud-

ner v. Robinson Aviation, Inc., 910 F.3d

141 (4th Cir. 2018), the Fourth Circuit held

that exhaustion of a collective bargaining

agreement’s grievance procedure is not a

jurisdictional prerequisite to a suit for

breach of the agreement. See Ch. 100, The

Structure of the Federal Judicial System,

§ 100.20[6].

Diversity. In Ashford v. Aeroframe

Servs., L.L.C., 907 F.3d 385 (5th Cir.

2018), the Fifth Circuit held that the basis

0001 [ST: 1] [ED: 100000] [REL: 202] (Beg Group) Composed: Wed May 8 11:22:56 EDT 2019XPP 9.0C.1 SP #4 PU000000 nllp 410 [PW=477pt PD= TW=360pt TD=546pt]

VER: [PU000000-Master:29 Oct 13 02:10][MX-SECNDARY: 07 May 19 03:33][TT-: 23 Sep 11 07:01 loc=usa unit=00410-pubup01] 0

for realigning parties must have existed

when the suit was filed. See Ch. 102,

Diversity Jurisdiction, § 102.16[2][c].

Federal Question Jurisdiction

In Estate of Cornell v. Bayview Loan

Servicing, LLC, 908 F.3d 1008 (6th Cir.

2018), the Sixth Circuit held that there was

no substantial federal question in a wrong-

ful foreclosure case. See Ch. 103, Federal

Question Jurisdiction, § 103.31[4][g].

In Texas v. Travis Cty., 910 F.3d 809 (5th

Cir. 2018), the Fifth Circuit held that there

was no federal question jurisdiction over a

suit by the State of Texas seeking a decla-

ration that its laws to curb sanctuary-city

policies did not violate the Fourth or Four-

teenth Amendments and was not preempted

by federal law. See § 103.44[3].

Alien Tort Statute. In Doe v. Nestle,

S.A., 906 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir. 2018), the

Ninth Circuit held that the Supreme Court’s

opinion in Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLC did

not eliminate ATS liability for domestic

corporations. The court also held that in

determining whether the presumption

against extraterritoriality is overcome in an

ATS suit, the focus is on the defendant’s

conduct that is alleged to be either a direct

violation of the law of nations or conduct

that constitutes aiding and abetting anoth-

er’s violation of that law. The court con-

cluded that alleged financing arrangements

originating in the U.S. and designed to

perpetuate slave labor in the Ivory Coast

were relevant to ATS’s focus. See Ch. 104,

Specific Grants of Federal Question Juris-

diction, §§ 104.21A[2], 104.22[3].

Federal Tort Claims Act. In Croyle v.

United States, 908 F.3d 377 (8th Cir.

2018), the Eighth Circuit held that an Army

medical center’s failure to warn families of

the sexual propensities of a priest and to

prevent the priest from having contact with

children fell within the discretionary func-

tion exception to the FTCA’s waiver of

sovereign immunity. See Ch. 105, Other

Subject Matter Jurisdiction Statutes,

§ 105.26[2][a.1][iv].

Ancillary Jurisdiction

In In re Cmty. Bank N. Va. Mortg.

Lending Practices Litig., 911 F.3d 666 (3d

Cir. 2018), the Third Circuit held that a

district court had no ancillary jurisdiction

over a state breach of contract action con-

cerning attorney’s fees awarded in a federal

class action settlement. See Ch. 106,

Supplemental Jurisdiction, § 106.05[9][b].

In Harrington v. Berryhill, 906 F.3d 561

(7th Cir. 2018), the Seventh Circuit de-

clined to exercise ancillary jurisdiction

over challenges to a Treasury Department

program offsetting the amount of attorney’s

fee awards against debts owed by the plain-

tiffs to the federal government. See

§ 106.24[4].

In Burgos-Yantín v. Municipality of

Juana Díaz, 909 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2018), the

First Circuit held that a district court had

ancillary jurisdiction over a motion to en-

force a resolution issued by the Puerto Rico

Secretary of Justice directing a city to

indemnify two police officers who had been

found liable in their personal capacities for

using excessive force. See § 106.05[9][c].

Removal

In Teamsters Local 404 Health Servs. &

Ins. Plan v. King Pharms., Inc., 906 F.3d

260 (2d Cir. 2018), the Second Circuit held

that a pre-suit disclosure petition filed un-

der New York law is not a removable civil

action. See Ch. 107, Removal, § 107.26.

In Betzner v. Boeing Co., 910 F.3d 1010

(7th Cir. 2018), the Seventh Circuit held

that a notice of removal under § 1442 need

not contain evidence. See § 107.100[5][c].

Abstention. Subsection 122.72[1][c] has

been added to Ch. 122, Abstention Doc-

0001 [ST: 1] [ED: 100000] [REL: 202] Composed: Wed May 8 11:22:56 EDT 2019XPP 9.0C.1 SP #4 PU000000 nllp 410 [PW=477pt PD= TW=360pt TD=546pt]


trines, concerning abstention to avoid in-

terference with a state’s administration of

justice based on O’Shea v. Littleton. Con-

flicting decisions from the Seventh and

Ninth Circuits concerning suits seeking to

require state courts to release electronically

filed complaints to the press immediately

on receipt have been included. See Court-

house News Serv. v. Planet, 750 F.3d 776

(9th Cir. 2018), and Courthouse News Serv.

v. Brown, 908 F.3d 1063 (7th Cir. 2018).

State Sovereign Immunity. In Nevada

v. Hall, the Supreme Court held that states

have no sovereign immunity against suits

filed in other states’ courts. The possibility

that the case will be overturned in Fran-

chise Tax Bd. v. Hyatt is discussed in Ch.

123, Access to Courts: Eleventh Amend-

ment and State Sovereign Immunity,

§ 123.22[4][b].

Time for Intervention. In Illinois v. City

of Chicago, 912 F.3d 979 (7th Cir. 2019),

the Seventh Circuit held that a prospective

intervenor must move promptly to inter-

vene as soon as it has reason to know that

its interests might be adversely affected by

the litigation. See Ch. 24, Intervention,

§ 24.21[3].

Preserving Claim of Instructional Er-

ror. The Fourth Circuit, in United States ex

rel. Oberg v. Pa. Higher Educ. Assistance

Agency, 912 F.3d 731, 736–737 (4th Cir.

2019), explained that to constitute a “de-

finitive ruling” on a requested jury instruc-

tion under Civil Rule 51(d)(1)(B) so as to

preserve a claim of error, the record must

provide the reviewing court with a suffi-

cient basis from which to determine that the

district court rejected the instruction on the

merits. See Ch. 51, Instructions to the Jury;

Objections; Preserving a Claim of Error,

§ 51.40.

Award of “Full Costs” Under Copy-

right Act. In Rimini St., Inc. v. Oracle

USA, Inc., 2019 U.S. LEXIS 1733 (Mar. 4,

2019), the Supreme Court resolved a circuit

split and held that the reference to “full

costs” in the Copyright Act’s cost-shifting

provision, 17 U.S.C. § 505, does not ex-

pand the categories or kinds of expenses

that may be awarded as costs under the

general federal costs provisions, 28 U.S.C.

§§ 1821 and 1920. See Ch. 54, Judgment;

Costs, § 54.103[3][a], [c][ii].

Declaratory Judgment—Amount in

Controversy. In Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co.

v. Vein Ctrs. for Excellence, Inc., 912 F.3d

1076 (8th Cir. 2019), the Eighth Circuit

clarified that for purposes of calculating the

amount in controversy for diversity juris-

diction over a declaratory-judgment action

to determine a liability insurer’s obligation

to defend and indemnify its insured against

class claims, the action involves only one

claim for the sum of defense and indemnity

costs, even though the underlying action

may include multiple claims against the

insured. See Ch. 57, Declaratory Judgment,

§ 57.21[3][c].

Nationwide Injunctions. The Ninth Cir-

cuit, in California v. Azar, 911 F.3d 558

(9th Cir. 2018), pointed out that although a

district court is not barred from issuing a

nationwide injunction, such broad relief

must be necessary to give the prevailing

parties the relief to which they are entitled.

See Ch. 65, Injunctions and Restraining

Orders, § 65.07[1].

Federal Arbitration Act Exclusion for

Transportation Workers. The Supreme

Court, in New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira, 202

L. Ed. 2d 536 (2019), ruled that the Federal

Arbitration Act’s exclusion for “contracts

of employment” of transportation workers,

9 U.S.C. § 1, extends to those who work as

independent contractors. See Ch. 131,



Claim Preclusion and Res Judicata,

§ 131.32[3][a]; Ch. 203, Interlocutory Or-

ders, § 203.12[1].

Preclusive Effect of Dismissal

In Scahill v. District of Columbia, 909

F.3d 1177 (D.C. Cir. 2018), the court held

that a jurisdictional dismissal by a federal

court may be relitigated if events occurring

subsequent to the dismissal have remedied

the original jurisdictional deficiency. See

Ch. 132, Issue Preclusion and Collateral

Estoppel, §§ 132.02[2][g], 132.03[5][c].

Appeal of Class-Certification Ruling.

The Supreme Court, in Nutraceutical Corp.

v. Lambert, 203 L. Ed. 2d 43 (2019), held

that a court of appeals may not forgive on

equitable-tolling grounds a party’s failure

to comply with Civil Rule 23(f)’s deadline

to seek permission to appeal a class-

certification ruling, if the opposing party

objects that the appeal is untimely. See Ch.

203, Interlocutory Orders, § 203.34[2].

Review of Agency Action. In Weyerhae-

user Co. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 202

L. Ed. 2d 269 (2018), the Supreme Court

reaffirmed that the Administrative Proce-

dure Act’s prohibition of judicial review

for actions “committed to agency discre-

tion,” 5 U.S.C. § 701(a), does not prevent

judicial review of a routine dispute over

whether an agency properly justified its

determination under a governing statutory

standard. See Ch. 205, Reviewability of

Issues, § 205.06; Ch. 206, Standards of

Review, § 206.05[2]; Ch. 315, Review or

Enforcement of an Agency Order—How

Obtained; Intervention, § 315.11.

Delay of Appeal Period. The Ninth

Circuit, in Stevens v. Jiffy Lube Int’l, Inc.,

911 F.3d 1249 (9th Cir. 2018), held that a

post-judgment motion will operate to defer

the start of the appeal period, so long as the

motion is timely and qualifies as one of the

motions listed in Appellate Rule

4(a)(4)(A), even if the motion lacks merit.

See Ch. 304, Appeal as of Right—When

Taken, § 304.13[2].

Advisory Mandamus. In In re Grand

Jury Subpoena, 909 F.3d 26 (1st Cir.

2018), the First Circuit articulated the req-

uisites for advisory mandamus: the issue

must be an unsettled one of substantial

public importance, it must be likely to

recur, and deferral of review must have the

potential to impair the opportunity for ef-

fective review or relief later on. See Ch.

321, Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition,

and Other Extraordinary Writs,

§ 321.14[1].

En Banc Quorum. The Supreme Court,

in Yovino v. Rizo, 203 L. Ed. 2d 38 (2019)

(per curiam), held that an en banc court of

appeals could not count the vote of a judge

who died before issuance of the en banc

decision, even though he had participated

in the en banc hearing and had authored an

opinion that appeared to have majority

support if his vote could have been

counted. See Ch. 335, En Banc Determina-

tion, § 335.11[2].

Class Actions

In Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert, —

U.S. —, — S. Ct. —, — L.Ed.3d —, 2019

U.S. LEXIS 1593, at *6–*10 (Feb. 26,

2019), the Supreme Court held that the

Rule 23(f) time limit for seeking an inter-

locutory appeal of a class certification de-

cision is a nonjurisdictional claim-

processing rule, and therefore may be

waived or forfeited, but is not subject to

extension by the court of appeals under an

equitable tolling doctrine. See Ch. 23, Class

Actions, § 23.88[2][b].

In Weitzner v. Sanofi Pasteur Inc., 909

F.3d 604, 612 (3d Cir. 2018), the Third

Circuit decided that the American Pipe

tolling rule does not apply to the named

plaintiffs in the original suit. See Ch. 23,



Class Actions, § 23.65[1][a].

In Camp Drug Store, Inc. v. Cochran

Wholesale Pharm., Inc., 897 F.3d 825,

834–835 (7th Cir. 2018), the Seventh Cir-

cuit discussed the propriety of an incentive

award to the named plaintiff in a class

action, allowing the award but reducing the

amount to $1,000 in light of the degree of

participation and amount of time and effort

expended. See Ch. 23, Class Actions,

§ 23.164[6].

Personal Jurisdiction. In Prep Tours,

Inc. v. Am. Youth Soccer Org., 913 F.3d 11,

18 (1st Cir. 2019), the First Circuit reiter-

ated its “flexible, relaxed standard” for

assessing relatedness as part of the specific

personal jurisdiction analysis; the First Cir-

cuit requires only a “demonstrable nexus”

between the complaint’s claims and activi-

ties in the forum that properly may be

attributed to defendants. See Ch. 108, Ter-

ritorial Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction Over

Persons and Property, § 108.42[7][b].

Venue. In California v. Azar, 911 F.3d

558, 570 (9th Cir. 2018), the Ninth Circuit

determined that, for purposes of determin-

ing venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e) in an

action by a state, the state “resides” in

every judicial district within the state’s

borders. See Ch. 110, Determination of

Proper Venue, § 110.31[4].

Forum Non Conveniens. In Simon v.

Republic of Hungary, 911 F.3d 1172, 1182

(D.C. Cir. 2018), the D.C. Circuit empha-

sized the important weight carried by a

U.S. plaintiff’s choice of a home forum in

the forum non conveniens analysis, even

when other plaintiffs are not from the U.S.

See Ch. 111, Change of Venue,

§ 111.75[1].

Modification of Scheduling Orders. In

Springboards to Educ. v. Indep. Sch. Dist.,

912 F.3d 805 (5th Cir. 2019), the plaintiff

sought leave to extend the dispositive-

motion deadline. The Fifth Circuit holds

that a scheduling order may be modified

only for good cause, and one factor to

consider in determining whether good

cause exists is why modification is needed.

The court found that plaintiff failed to show

good cause to file an amended motion for

summary judgment after scheduling order

deadline for dispositive motions because

plaintiff failed to show how new documents

not obtained until after the deadline would

be needed to support either its original

motion or its proposed amended summary

judgment motion. See Ch. 16, Pretrial

Conferences; Scheduling; Management,

§ 16.14[1].

Final Pretrial Order Defines Issues for

Trial. In Exby-Stolley v. Bd. of County

Comm’rs, 906 F.3d 900 (10th Cir. 2018),

the Tenth Circuit ruled that the district

court did not abuse its discretion in refusing

to allow plaintiff to add a new theory of

liability after the pretrial order was final-

ized. The court explained that the purpose

of the final pretrial conference order is to

clarify the nature of disputes at issue so that

the parties may plan their trial strategies. In

light of this purpose, a district court has

discretion to exclude from trial issues and

claims not set forth in the pretrial order and

to refuse to instruct the jury on matters

beyond the scope of the pretrial order. See

Ch. 16, Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling;

Management, §§ 16.78, 16.79.

Appellate Review of Discovery Orders.

As a general rule, discovery orders are not

immediately appealable. In Vantage Health

Plan v. Willis-Knighton Med. Ctr., 913

F.3d 443 (5th Cir. 2019), the Fifth Circuit

joined a number of other circuits in holding

that orders sealing and unsealing discovery

documents are reviewable on interlocutory

appeal as exceptions to the final judgment

rule under the collateral order doctrine. See

Ch. 26, Duty to Disclose, General Provi-



sions Governing Discovery, § 26.07[2][h].

Attorney-Client Privilege. In Siler v.

EPA, 908 F.3d 1291 (Fed. Cir. 2018), the

Federal Circuit held that a government

agency may be a “client” whose communi-

cations with its attorneys are protected by

the attorney-client privilege. See Ch. 26,

Duty to Disclose, General Provisions Gov-

erning Discovery, § 26.49[4][b].

Legislative Privilege Applicable to Lo-

cal Legislators. InLee v. City of Los An-

geles, 908 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir. 2018), the

Ninth Circuit held that state and local

legislators may invoke the legislative privi-

lege, which precludes legislators from be-

ing subjected to examination about their

personal motivation in enacting legislation.

Without finding that the legislative privi-

lege as applied to local legislators is quali-

fied, the court observed that plaintiffs are

generally barred from deposing local legis-

lators, even in “extraordinary circum-

stances.” See Ch. 26, Duty to Disclose,

General Provisions Governing Discovery,

§ 26.52[11].

Rule 26(g) Sanctions. In SPV-LS, LLC

v. Transamerica Life Ins. Co., 912 F.3d

1106 (8th Cir. 2019), the court held that

Rule 26(g) sanctions are mandatory if,

without substantial justification, an attor-

ney or party improperly certifies discovery

responses. The court found that Rule 26(g)

sanctions “are particularly appropriate

when an attorney submits a forged discov-

ery document.” See Ch. 26, Duty to Dis-

close, General Provisions Governing Dis-

covery, § 26.154.

Execution of Medical Record Releases.

Scott v. City of Bismarck, 328 F.R.D. 242

(D.N.D. 2018): A magistrate judge in the

Eighth Circuit held that requests for execu-

tion of releases can be made pursuant to

Rule 34 to enable the requesting party to

obtain directly from nonparties records that

are subject to the control of the party to

whom the Rule 34 request has been made.

See Ch. 34, Production of Documents,

Electronically Stored Information, and

Things and Entry Upon Land for Inspection

and Other Purposes, § 34.12[1].

Testimony by Video. Thomas v. Ander-

son, 912 F.3d 971 (7th Cir. 2018): Despite

the preference for live testimony in open

court, the Seventh Circuit held that judges

have discretion to allow live testimony by

video for good cause in compelling circum-

stances. In this case, the trial judge was

within his discretion in determining that the

right to in-court testimony was outweighed

by the expense and inconvenience of trans-

porting incarcerated witnesses to court. Ch.

43, Taking Testimony, § 43.03.

Referral of Case to Magistrate Judge

In Parsons v. Ryan, 912 F.3d 486 (9th

Cir. 2018), the defendants, relying on

Hatcher v. Consolidated City of Indianapo-

lis, 323 F.3d 513 (7th Cir. 2003), argued

that, because the magistrate judge assign-

ment is a matter for the court to decide, the

district court’s referral of the case to the

parties’ “hand-picked” choice was invalid.

Distinguishing Hatcher, the Ninth Circuit

rejected the defendant’s argument.

In Hatcher, the parties referred the mat-

ter to a named magistrate judge via a

settlement agreement, thereby circumvent-

ing the district court’s procedures for as-

signing magistrate judges. In Parsons, al-

though the parties requested referral to a

specific magistrate judge, they did not pro-

ceed on the authority of their own referral.

Rather, it was the district court itself that

referred the case to the magistrate judge

requested by the parties. Thus, the parties

proceeded based on the district court’s

designation by written order in compliance

with Rule 73. See Ch. 73, Magistrate

Judges: Trial by Consent; Appeal, § 73.04.



Ch. 15, Amended and Supplemental

Pleadings

NewSpin Sports, Ltd. Liab. Co. v. Arrow

Elecs., Inc., 910 F.3d 293 (7th Cir. 2018),

which held that when a complaint is dis-

missed and final judgment is entered simul-

taneously, a district court must consider a

proposed amended complaint under the

same liberal standard of Rule 15(a)(2) that

applies to prejudgment amendments (see

§ 15.13[2]).

T Mobile N.E. LLC v. City of Wilming-

ton, 913 F.3d 311 (3d Cir. 2019), which

held that a supplemental pleading relates

back to the original pleading under the

same standards applied to amended plead-

ings under Rule 15(c) (see §§ 15.19[2],

15.30[4]).

Scahill v. District of Columbia, 909 F.3d

1177 (D.C. Cir. 2018), which held that a

supplemental pleading can be used to cure

a defect in subject matter jurisdiction such

as a defect in Article III standing at com-

mencement (see § 15.30[3]).

Ch. 13, Counterclaim and Crossclaim.

In Bedrosian v. United States, Dep’t of

Treasury, IRS, 912 F.3d 144 (3d Cir. 2018),

the court held that the assertion of a coun-

terclaim by the United States provides an

independent basis for federal subject matter

jurisdiction (see § 13.50[3]).

Ch. 12, Defenses and Objections: When

and How Presented; Motion for Judgment

on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions;

Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

Carbone v. CNN, Inc., 910 F.3d 1345

(11th Cir. 2018), which held that the Geor-

gia anti-SLAPP statute does not apply at all

in a diversity action because it is in direct

conflict with the federal rules governing the

adequacy of initial pleadings, the propriety

of dismissal for failure to state a claim, and

federal summary judgment standards (see

§ 12.04).

Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Custom Nu-

trition Labs, LLC, 912 F.3d 316 (6th Cir.

2018), which held that merely mentioning

Rule 12(b)(2) or personal jurisdiction in the

caption or heading of a pre-answer motion

is insufficient to preserve the issue when

the body of the motion fails to address it

(see §§ 12.20, 12.31[3]).

Sneha Media & Entm’t, LLC v. Associ-

ated Broad. Co. P, 911 F.3d 192 (4th Cir.

2018), which held that live testimony is not

required to show that a district court held

an evidentiary hearing under Rule 12(b)(2)

and properly applied the preponderance of

evidence standard to resolve the issue of

personal jurisdiction (see § 12.31[5]).

Ironshore Europe DAC v. Hardin, 912

F.3d 759 (5th Cir. 2019), and Seun

Ogunkoya v. Monaghan, 913 F.3d 64 (2d

Cir. 2019), each of which held that the

affirmative defense of absolute immunity

may be raised under Rule 12(b)(6) when it

is conclusively established on the face of

the complaint (see § 12.34[4][b]).

Ch. 11, Signing Pleadings, Motions,

and Other Papers; Representations to the

Court; Sanctions. In Bell v. Vacuforce,

LLC, 908 F.3d 1075 (7th Cir. 2018), the

court held that a party or attorney who

engages in misconduct after a voluntary

dismissal or settlement is not insulated

from sua sponte monetary sanctions despite

the apparent prohibition of Rule

11(c)(5)(B) (see § 11.22[2][b]).

Ch. 6, Computing and Extending Time;

Time for Motion Papers. In Stevens v. Jiffy

Lube Int’l, Inc., 911 F.3d 1249 (9th Cir.

2018), the court held that Rule 6(a) applies

to compute a three-month limitations pe-

riod provided by the Federal Arbitration

Act (see § 6.03[2]).

Ch. 5, Serving and Filing Pleadings and



Other Papers. In Vantage Health Plan v.

Willis-Knighton Med. Ctr., 913 F.3d 443

(5th Cir. 2019), the court held that a district

court can consider in advance whether

future filings will be sealed, redacted, or

otherwise restricted from public disclosure,

and is not obliged to wait until after filing

to make that determination (see § 5.34[1]).

Ch. 4, Summons. In Sneha Media &

Entm’t, LLC v. Associated Broad. Co. P,

911 F.3d 192 (4th Cir. 2018), the court held

that service could not be based on Rule

4(k)(2) because the plaintiff failed to dem-

onstrate that the defendant was not subject

to personal jurisdiction in any state’s courts

of general jurisdiction (see § 4.02[1]).

Ch. 2, One Form of Action. In Caron v.

NCL (Bah.), Ltd., 910 F.3d 1359 (11th Cir.

2018), the court held that any error of a

district court in basing subject matter juris-

diction on diversity rather than admiralty is

harmless, because either proceeding is a

“civil action” under Rule 2 (see § 2.02[4]).

Chapter 19: Required Joinder of Par-

ties

Stare decisis threat as basis for join-

der. The distinction between joinder and

intervention, the Fifth Circuit has held, is

that there is no standing analysis for joinder

but there is for intervention. In Willie

Banks v. St. James Parish Sch. Bd., 2018

U.S. App. LEXIS 34932, at *11 (5th Cir.

Dec. 12, 2018), the Fifth Circuit held that

the trial court erred in failing to consider

whether Article III standing requirements,

which apply to those who seek to intervene

in an action, properly apply to a charter

school which sought to open in a court-

ordered desegregated school district. See

Ch. 19, Required Joinder of Parties,

§ 19.03[3][e].

Indispensability analysis. The Fifth Cir-

cuit has held that a partnership’s interests

are fully protected by the interests of its

partners. Moss v. Princip, 2019 U.S. App.

LEXIS 1453, at *16 (5th Cir. Jan. 16,

2019). See Ch. 19, Required Joinder of

Parties, § 19.05[1][a].

Chapter 20: Permissive Joinder

Permissive party joinder relates back.

The Eleventh Circuit has held that where an

injured customer mistakenly believed that

the manager of the store in which the injury

occurred was someone else but later

learned the manager to be a nondiverse

party, and the removal would have been

improper had the customer identified the

correct person, the removal of the case to

federal court would not have been proper

and the joinder of the correct manager was

not fraudulent. Dever v. Family Dollar

Stores of Ga., LLC, 314 F. Supp. 3d 420, at

*6-*7 (11th Cir. Nov. 2, 2018). See Ch. 20,

Permissive Joinder, § 20.02[2][a].

Chapter 21: Misjoinder and Nonjoin-

der of Parties

Rule 21 applies in absence of misjoin-

der or nonjoinder. The Fifth Circuit has

agreed with the other circuits which have

recently addressed the issue of the applica-

bility of Rule 21 even in the absence of

misjoinder or nonjoinder of parties to struc-

ture a case for the efficient administration

of justice. Moss v. Princip, 2019 U.S. App.

LEXIS 1453, at *16 (5th Cir. Jan. 16,

2019). See Ch. 21, Misjoinder and Nonjoin-

der, § 21.02[1].

Chapter 207: Complex Appeals

Supplementing the record. A party may

supplement the record pursuant to either

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(e)

or the inherent equitable power exception

to the constraints placed on supplementa-

tion by Rule 10(e). The Tenth Circuit Court

of Appeals in United States v. Walker,

2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 2194, at *16 (10th

Cir. Jan. 23, 2019) has held that the court



should evaluate the factors of whether the

proffered material would establish the ap-

propriate resolution of the case beyond any

doubt and whether a remand to consider

additional material would be contrary to

interests of justice and waste judicial re-

sources. See Ch. 207, Complex Appeals,

§ 207.11.

Chapter 208: Practice in the Federal

Circuit

District Court jurisdiction. District

courts have jurisdiction over civil actions

arising under 28 U.S.C. § 1338 where a

claim for relief under the federal statute

appears on the face of the complaint and

the statute is necessary for recovery on the

claim. In Xitronix Corp. v. Kla-Tencor

Corp., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 4672, at *24

(5th Cir. Feb. 15, 2019), the Fifth Circuit

held that the Federal Circuit’s transfer of

the case to it was not just incorrect but

implausible where litigation involved a pat-

ent standalone Walker Process claim and

no non-patent theories; it was transferred

back to Federal Circuit. See Ch. 208, Prac-

tice in the Federal Circuit, § 208.10[2].

Moore’s Federal Practice Update

For insightful and timely summaries of

the latest case law, read the monthly

Moore’s Federal Practice Update, available

for free as part of your Moore’s Federal

Practice subscription.

Matthew Bender provides continuing customersupport for all its products:

• Editorial assistance—please consult the

“Questions About This Publication” direc-tory printed on the copyright page;

• Customer Service—missing pages, ship-

ments, billing or other customer service

matters, +1.800.833.9844.

• Outside the United States and Canada,

+1.937.247.0293, or fax (+1.800.828.8341)or email ([email protected]);

• Toll-free ordering (+1.800.223.1940) or visit

www.lexisnexis.com/BrowseUs.

www.lexis.com

Copyright © 2019 Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a member of the LexisNexis Group.Publication 410, Release 202, June 2019

LexisNexis, the knowledge burst logo, and Michie are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used underlicense. Matthew Bender is a registered trademark of Matthew Bender Properties Inc.





FILING INSTRUCTIONS

Moore’s Federal PracticePublication 410 Release 202 June 2019

CheckAs

Done

□ 1. Check the Title page in the front of your present Volume 1. It should indicate that your set is filed

through Release Number 201. If the set is current, proceed with the filing of this release. If your set is

not filed through Release Number 201, DO NOT file this release. Please call Customer Services at

1-800-833-9844 for assistance in bringing your set up to date.

□ 2. Separate this Release Number 202 into the following groups of material:

• White Special Alert

• White Revision pages

□ Arrange these groups of material next to each other so that you can take material from each group as

required and proceed with the filing of this release.

□ 3. Circulate the “Publication Update” among those individuals interested in the contents of this release.

Moore’s Federal Practice (USPS 005–548) is published quarterly for $6,113.00 by Matthew Bender & CompanyInc., 3 Lear Jet Lane, Suite 102, PO Box 1710, Latham, NY 12110. Periodical postage is paid at Easton, MDand at additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Moore’s Federal Practice, 4810Williamsburg Road, Unit 2, Hurlock, MD 21643.

FI–1

0001 [ST: 1] [ED: 100000] [REL: 202] (Beg Group) Composed: Wed May 8 11:23:36 EDT 2019XPP 9.0C.1 SP #4 FI000000 nllp 410 [PW=473pt PD=684pt TW=360pt TD=546pt]

VER: [FI000000-Master:23 Aug 08 10:45][MX-SECNDARY: 07 May 19 03:33][TT-: 23 Sep 11 07:01 loc=usa unit=00410-fi0001] 0

Check Remove Old Insert NewAs Pages Numbered Pages Numbered

Done

For faster and easier filing, all references are to right-hand pages only.

VOLUME 1

Revision

□ Title page. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Title page

□ 1-31 thru 1-34.2(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-31 thru 1-34.2(3)

□ 1-53 thru 1-55 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-53 thru 1-57

□ 2-9 thru 2-18.3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-9 thru 2-18.5

□ 3-25 thru 3-31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-25 thru 3-32.1

Special Alert

□ No Material removed . . . . . . . . . . . Special Alert pages 4SA-1 thru 4SA-3 (filepreceding 4-1)

Revision

□ 4-19 thru 4-23 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-19 thru 4-24.1

□ 5-67 thru 5-80.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-67 thru 5-73

□ 6-7 thru 6-17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-7 thru 6-18.1

□ 6-37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-37 thru 6-38.1

VOLUME 2

Revision


□ 7-15 thru 7-19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-15 thru 7-21

□ 8-29 thru 8-32.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-29 thru 8-32.1

□ 8-37 thru 8-42.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-37 thru 8-42.1

□ 8-53 thru 8-58.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-53 thru 8-58.3

□ 8-87 thru 8-93 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-87 thru 8-93

□ 9-21 thru 9-24.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-21 thru 9-24.1

□ 10-31 thru 10-37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-31 thru 10-39

□ 11-29 thru 11-32.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-29 thru 11-32.1

□ 11-61 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-61 thru 11-62.1

□ 11-68.1 thru 11-70.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-69 thru 11-70.2(5)

□ 11-93 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-93 thru 11-94.1

□ 12-17 thru 12-19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12-17 thru 12-19

□ 12-28.1 thru 12-28.5. . . . . . . . . . . . 12-28.1 thru 12-28.5

□ 12-41 thru 12-47 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12-41 thru 12-48.1

□ 12-50.7 thru 12-58.1. . . . . . . . . . . . 12-51 thru 12-58.1

□ 12-107 thru 12-108.4(1) . . . . . . . . . . 12-107 thru 12-108.3

□ 12-121 thru 12-125 . . . . . . . . . . . . 12-121 thru 12-126.1

VOLUME 3

FI–2

0001 [ST: 1] [ED: 100000] [REL: 202] Composed: Wed May 8 11:23:36 EDT 2019XPP 9.0C.1 SP #4 FI000000 nllp 410 [PW=473pt PD=684pt TW=360pt TD=546pt]



Done

Revision


□ iii thru xiii . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii thru xiii

□ 13-57 thru 13-58.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13-57 thru 13-58.1

□ 14-9 thru 14-15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14-9 thru 14-16.1

□ 14-63 thru 14-65 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14-63 thru 14-65

□ 15-3 thru 15-6.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15-3 thru 15-6.1

□ 15-19 thru 15-22.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 15-19 thru 15-22.1

□ 15-33 thru 15-36.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 15-33 thru 15-36.1

□ 15-45 thru 15-48.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 15-45 thru 15-48.1

□ 15-77. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15-77 thru 15-78.1

□ 15-101 thru 15-106.2(1) . . . . . . . . . . 15-101 thru 15-106.2(1)

□ 15-130.1 thru 15-137 . . . . . . . . . . . 15-131 thru 15-143

□ 16-33 thru 16-35 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-33 thru 16-35

□ 16-49 thru 16-55 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-49 thru 16-55

□ 16-73 thru 16-82.2(1) . . . . . . . . . . . 16-73 thru 16-82.2(1)

□ 16-195 thru 16-197 . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-195 thru 16-197

□ 16-207 thru 16-212.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 16-207 thru 16-211

□ 16-221 thru 16-223 . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-221 thru 16-223

VOLUME 4

Revision


□ iii thru ix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii thru ix

□ 17-27 thru 17-33 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-27 thru 17-34.1

□ 17-89 thru 17-92.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-89 thru 17-92.1

□ 17-113 thru 17-119 . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-113 thru 17-119

□ 18-3 thru 18-5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-3 thru 18-6.1

□ 18-39. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-39

□ 19-15. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19-15 thru 19-16.1

□ 19-55. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19-55 thru 19-56.1

□ 19-85 thru 19-87 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19-85 thru 19-88.1

□ 19-94.1 thru 19-95 . . . . . . . . . . . . 19-95 thru 19-96.1

□ 20-11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20-11 thru 20-12.1

□ 20-25 thru 20-35 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20-25 thru 20-35

□ 20-45 thru 20-47 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20-45 thru 20-47

□ 21-3 thru 21-5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21-3 thru 21-6.1

□ 21-23 thru 21-31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21-23 thru 21-32.1

□ 22-29 thru 22-30.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 22-29 thru 22-30.1

□ 22-43 thru 22-47 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22-43 thru 22-48.1

VOLUME 5

FI–3




Done

Revision


□ 23-143 thru 23-145 . . . . . . . . . . . . 23-143 thru 23-145

□ 23-303 thru 23-304.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 23-303 thru 23-304.1

□ 23-366.1 thru 23-372.5 . . . . . . . . . . 23-367 thru 23-372.5

□ 23-407 thru 23-414.3 . . . . . . . . . . . 23-407 thru 23-414.3

□ 23-421 thru 23-422.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 23-421 thru 23-422.1

□ 23-582.1 thru 23-582.3 . . . . . . . . . . 23-582.1 thru 23-582.3

VOLUME 6

Revision


□ 24-97 thru 24-105 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24-97 thru 24-106.1

□ 26-55 thru 26-58.3 . . . . . . . . . . . . 26-55 thru 26-58.3

□ 26-67 thru 26-68.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 26-67 thru 26-68.2(1)

□ 26-89 thru 26-90.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 26-89 thru 26-90.1

□ 26-101 thru 26-104.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 26-101 thru 26-104.1

□ 26-117 thru 26-120.2(1) . . . . . . . . . . 26-117 thru 26-120.2(1)

□ 26-129 thru 26-133 . . . . . . . . . . . . 26-129 thru 26-134.1

□ 26-353 thru 26-354.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 26-353 thru 26-354.1

□ 26-375 thru 26-378.2(1) . . . . . . . . . . 26-375 thru 26-378.1

□ 26-409 thru 26-412.2(2)(b)(iii) . . . . . . . 26-409 thru 26-412.2(2)(b)(iii)

□ 26-423 thru 26-426.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 26-423 thru 26-426.1

□ 26-453 thru 26-461 . . . . . . . . . . . . 26-453 thru 26-461

□ 26-523 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26-523 thru 26-524.1

□ 26-531 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26-531 thru 26-532.1

□ 26-577 thru 26-578.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 26-577 thru 26-578.1

□ 26-586.1 thru 26-592.1 . . . . . . . . . . 26-587 thru 26-592.3

□ 26-613 thru 26-621 . . . . . . . . . . . . 26-613 thru 26-621

VOLUME 7

Revision


□ 30-17 thru 30-23 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30-17 thru 30-24.1

□ 32-9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32-9 thru 32-10.1

□ 34-38.1 thru 34-45 . . . . . . . . . . . . 34-39 thru 34-46.1

□ 34-52.1 thru 34-53 . . . . . . . . . . . . 34-53 thru 34-54.1

□ 34-60.1 thru 34-61 . . . . . . . . . . . . 34-61 thru 34-62.3

□ 37-201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37-201 thru 37-202.1

□ 37-219 thru 37-221 . . . . . . . . . . . . 37-219 thru 37-221

VOLUME 8

FI–4




Done

Revision


□ 38-183 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38-183 thru 38-184.1

□ 41-99 thru 41-101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41-99 thru 41-101

□ 41-169 thru 41-171 . . . . . . . . . . . . 41-169 thru 41-171

□ 43-11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43-11 thru 43-12.1

VOLUME 9

Revision


□ 47-56.1 thru 47-59 . . . . . . . . . . . . 47-57 thru 47-61

□ 49-37 thru 49-39 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49-37 thru 49-40.1

□ 49-51 thru 49-54.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 49-51 thru 49-54.1

□ 50-87. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50-87

□ 50-101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50-101

□ 50-123 thru 50-126.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 50-123 thru 50-126.1

□ 51-33. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51-33 thru 51-34.1

□ 51-49 thru 51-50.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 51-49 thru 51-50.1

□ 52-129 thru 52-133 . . . . . . . . . . . . 52-129 thru 52-135

VOLUME 10

Revision


□ 54-83. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54-83 thru 54-84.1

□ 54-155 thru 54-156.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 54-155 thru 54-156.1

□ 54-187 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54-187

□ 54-199 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54-199

□ 54-273 thru 54-274.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 54-273 thru 54-274.1

□ 54-309 thru 54-312.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 54-309 thru 54-312.1

□ 54-337 thru 54-339 . . . . . . . . . . . . 54-337 thru 54-339

□ 54-347 thru 54-348.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 54-347 thru 54-348.3

□ 54-389 thru 54-408.3 . . . . . . . . . . . 54-389 thru 54-408.5

□ 54-423 thru 54-424.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 54-423 thru 54-424.1

□ 54-435 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54-435 thru 54-436.1

□ 54-455 thru 54-457 . . . . . . . . . . . . 54-455 thru 54-457

□ 54-481 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54-481 thru 54-482.1

□ 54-505 thru 54-509 . . . . . . . . . . . . 54-505 thru 54-509

VOLUME 11

Revision

FI–5




Done


□ 56-107 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56-107 thru 56-108.1

□ 56-217 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56-217 thru 56-218.1

□ 56-236.1 thru 56-237 . . . . . . . . . . . 56-236.1 thru 56-236.7

□ 56-264.1 thru 56-265 . . . . . . . . . . . 56-265 thru 56-266.1

□ 56-281 thru 56-282.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 56-281 thru 56-282.1

VOLUME 12

Revision


□ 57-33 thru 57-45 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57-33 thru 57-46.1

□ 60-17. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60-17 thru 60-18.1

□ 60-55. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60-55

□ 62-5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62-5 thru 62-6.1

□ 62App.-7 thru 62App.-9 . . . . . . . . . . 62App.-7 thru 62App.-9

VOLUME 13

Revision


□ 65-13. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65-13 thru 65-14.1

□ 65-22.1 thru 65-37 . . . . . . . . . . . . 65-23 thru 65-38.1

□ 65-51 thru 65-52.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 65-51 thru 65-52.2(1)

□ 67-5 thru 67-9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67-5 thru 67-9

□ 68-15 thru 68-22.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 68-15 thru 68-22.3

□ 68-33 thru 68-35 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68-33 thru 68-35

□ 68-55 thru 68-56.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 68-55 thru 68-56.1

□ 68-72.1 thru 68-73 . . . . . . . . . . . . 68-73 thru 68-74.1

□ 71.1-45 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71.1-45

VOLUME 14

Revision


□ 72-15 thru 72-22.3 . . . . . . . . . . . . 72-15 thru 72-22.5

□ 72-51. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72-51 thru 72-52.1

□ 73-17. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73-17 thru 73-18.1

□ 77-5 thru 77-8.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77-5 thru 77-8.1

□ 81-29 thru 81-37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81-29 thru 81-35

VOLUME 15

FI–6




Done

Revision


□ 100-45 thru 100-50.7 . . . . . . . . . . . 100-45 thru 100-50.8(3)

Special Alert

□ No Material removed . . . . . . . . . . . Special Alert page 101SA-1 (file preceding101-1)

Revision

□ 101-36.1 thru 101-36.9 . . . . . . . . . . 101-36.1 thru 101-36.9

□ 101-53 thru 101-54.3 . . . . . . . . . . . 101-53 thru 101-54.3

□ 101-90.1 thru 101-95 . . . . . . . . . . . 101-91 thru 101-96.1

□ 101-116.1 thru 101-116.3 . . . . . . . . . 101-116.1 thru 101-116.4(1)

□ 101-116.11 thru 101-116.17 . . . . . . . . 101-116.11 thru 101-116.17

□ 101-123 thru 101-125 . . . . . . . . . . . 101-123 thru 101-126.1

□ 101-141 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101-141 thru 101-142.1

□ 101-154.1 thru 101-157 . . . . . . . . . . 101-155 thru 101-158.1

□ 101-171 thru 101-177 . . . . . . . . . . . 101-171 thru 101-178.1

□ 101-207 thru 101-210.7 . . . . . . . . . . 101-207 thru 101-210.9

□ 101-280.1 thru 101-287 . . . . . . . . . . 101-281 thru 101-288.7

□ 101-294.1 thru 101-297 . . . . . . . . . . 101-295 thru 101-298.1

□ 101-321 thru 101-324.2(1) . . . . . . . . . 101-321 thru 101-324.1

□ 101-353 thru 101-362.1 . . . . . . . . . . 101-353 thru 101-361

□ 101-369 thru 101-370.1 . . . . . . . . . . 101-369

□ 101-377 thru 101-385 . . . . . . . . . . . 101-377 thru 101-386.5

□ 101-395 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101-395 thru 101-396.1

□ 101-412.1 thru 101-424.3 . . . . . . . . . 101-413 thru 101-424.1

□ 101-443 thru 101-446.2(3) . . . . . . . . . 101-443 thru 101-446.2(3)

□ 101-446.9 thru 101-449 . . . . . . . . . . 101-447 thru 101-450.1

□ 101-467 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101-467

VOLUME 15A

Revision


□ 102-39 thru 102-45 . . . . . . . . . . . . 102-39 thru 102-46.1

□ 102-84.1 thru 102-85 . . . . . . . . . . . 102-85 thru 102-86.1

□ 102-96.1 thru 102-104.1 . . . . . . . . . . 102-97 thru 102-104.1

□ 102-116.1 thru 102-119 . . . . . . . . . . 102-117 thru 102-120.1

□ 102-195 thru 102-196.1 . . . . . . . . . . 102-195

□ 102-309 thru 102-315 . . . . . . . . . . . 102-309 thru 102-315

□ 103-58.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103-58.1

□ 103-68.1 thru 103-76.1 . . . . . . . . . . 103-69 thru 103-76.2(3)

□ 103-83 thru 103-84.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 103-83 thru 103-84.1

FI–7




Done

Special Alert

□ No Material removed . . . . . . . . . . . Special Alert pages 104SA-1 thru 104SA-3(file preceding 104-1)

Revision

□ 104-88.17 thru 104-88.20(5) . . . . . . . . 104-88.17 thru 104-88.20(6)(a)

□ 105-35 thru 105-45 . . . . . . . . . . . . 105-35 thru 105-46.5

□ 105-48.6(5) thru 105-48.14(5) . . . . . . . 105-48.7 thru 105-48.14(6)(c)

□ 105-48.39. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105-48.39 thru 105-48.41

□ 106-11 thru 106-16.3 . . . . . . . . . . . 106-11 thru 106-16.3

□ 106-34.1 thru 106-34.9 . . . . . . . . . . 106-34.1 thru 106-34.11

□ 106-42.1 thru 106-48.1 . . . . . . . . . . 106-43 thru 106-48.3

VOLUME 16

Revision


□ 107-37 thru 107-41 . . . . . . . . . . . . 107-37 thru 107-42.1

□ 107-94.1 thru 107-99 . . . . . . . . . . . 107-95 thru 107-100.1

□ 107-198.1 thru 107-199 . . . . . . . . . . 107-199 thru 107-200.1

□ 107-222.1 thru 107-222.3 . . . . . . . . . 107-222.1 thru 107-222.3

□ 107-247 thru 107-248.1 . . . . . . . . . . 107-247 thru 107-248.1

□ 107-262.1 thru 107-262.5 . . . . . . . . . 107-262.1 thru 107-262.7

□ 107-480.1 thru 107-488.1 . . . . . . . . . 107-481 thru 107-488.1

□ 107-527 thru 107-531 . . . . . . . . . . . 107-527 thru 107-531

□ 108-62.9 thru 108-70.1 . . . . . . . . . . 108-63 thru 108-70.1

□ 108-74.8(1) thru 108-74.11. . . . . . . . . 108-74.9 thru 108-74.11

□ 108-86.7 thru 108-86.9 . . . . . . . . . . 108-86.7 thru 108-86.10(1)

□ 108-106.5 thru 108-106.7 . . . . . . . . . 108-106.5 thru 108-106.7

VOLUME 17

Revision


□ 110-59 thru 110-60.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 110-59 thru 110-60.1

□ 111-197 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111-197 thru 111-198.1

□ 111-205 thru 111-206.2(1) . . . . . . . . . 111-205 thru 111-206.2(1)

□ 111-245 thru 111-248.1 . . . . . . . . . . 111-245 thru 111-248.2(1)

VOLUME 17A

Revision


FI–8




Done

□ 121-82.1 thru 121-89 . . . . . . . . . . . 121-83 thru 121-95

□ 122-3 thru 122-11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122-3 thru 122-12.1

□ 122-103 thru 122-114.1 . . . . . . . . . . 122-103 thru 122-114.3

□ 122-143 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122-143

□ 123-55 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123-55 thru 123-56.1

□ 123-84.1 thru 123-85 . . . . . . . . . . . 123-85 thru 123-86.3

□ 123-115 thru 123-116.1 . . . . . . . . . . 123-115 thru 123-116.1

□ 123-116.13 thru 123-116.15 . . . . . . . . 123-116.13 thru 123-116.15

□ 123-124.1 thru 123-124.2(1) . . . . . . . . 123-124.1 thru 123-124.2(2)(a)

□ 123-124.2(10)(e) thru 123-124.2(17) . . . . 123-124.2(11) thru 123-124.2(21)

□ 123-157 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123-157 thru 123-158.1

□ 123-171 thru 123-175 . . . . . . . . . . . 123-171 thru 123-175

□ 124-31 thru 124-38.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 124-31 thru 124-38.1

□ 124-87 thru 124-103. . . . . . . . . . . . 124-87 thru 124-104.1

VOLUME 18

Revision


□ 130-31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130-31

□ 131-124.1 thru 131-125 . . . . . . . . . . 131-125 thru 131-126.1

□ 132-17 thru 132-21 . . . . . . . . . . . . 132-17 thru 132-21

□ 132-33 thru 132-35 . . . . . . . . . . . . 132-33 thru 132-35

□ 132-132.1 thru 132-135 . . . . . . . . . . 132-133 thru 132-136.1

□ 133-60.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133-60.1 thru 133-60.2(1)

□ 133-60.17. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133-60.17 thru 133-60.18(1)

□ 133-60.27 thru 133-60.37 . . . . . . . . . 133-60.27 thru 133-60.38(1)

□ 133-60.52(3) thru 133-60.52(13) . . . . . . 133-60.52(3) thru 133-60.52(13)

□ 134-24.1 thru 134-26.1 . . . . . . . . . . 134-25 thru 134-26.2(1)

□ 134-43 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134-43 thru 134-44.1

VOLUME 19

Revision


□ 202-47 thru 202-50.2(1) . . . . . . . . . . 202-47 thru 202-50.2(1)

□ 202-57 thru 202-62.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 202-57 thru 202-62.1

□ 203-61 thru 203-71 . . . . . . . . . . . . 203-61 thru 203-72.1

□ 203-81 thru 203-84.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 203-81 thru 203-84.1

□ 203-137 thru 203-140.1 . . . . . . . . . . 203-137 thru 203-140.1

□ 204-29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204-29

□ 205-17 thru 205-23 . . . . . . . . . . . . 205-17 thru 205-24.3

□ 205-66.1 thru 205-75 . . . . . . . . . . . 205-67 thru 205-76.3

□ 206-35 thru 206-38.3 . . . . . . . . . . . 206-35 thru 206-38.3

FI–9




Done

□ 207-9 thru 207-13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207-9 thru 207-14.1

□ 207-18.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207-18.1

□ 208-7 thru 208-16.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 208-7 thru 208-16.1

□ 208-27 thru 208-40.3 . . . . . . . . . . . 208-27 thru 208-40.3

□ 208-55 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208-55

VOLUME 20

Revision


□ 303-24.1 thru 303-25 . . . . . . . . . . . 303-25 thru 303-26.1

□ 303-45 thru 303-56.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 303-45 thru 303-56.1

□ 304-37 thru 304-47 . . . . . . . . . . . . 304-37 thru 304-48.1

□ 315-7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315-7 thru 315-8.1

VOLUME 21

Revision


□ 321-11 thru 321-17 . . . . . . . . . . . . 321-11 thru 321-17

□ 324-13 thru 324-15 . . . . . . . . . . . . 324-13 thru 324-15

□ 328-11 thru 328-15 . . . . . . . . . . . . 328-11 thru 328-16.1

□ 335-9 thru 335-11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335-9 thru 335-13

VOLUME 23

Revision


Special Alert

□ Special Alert page 500SA-1 . . . . . . . . Special Alert page 500SA-1

□ No Material removed . . . . . . . . . . . Special Alert page 509SA-1 (file preceding509-1)





□ Special Alert page 533SA-1 . . . . . . . . Special Alert pages 533SA-1 thru 533SA-3


VOLUME .

Revision

FI–10




Done


□ CIV-3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CIV-3 thru CIV-4.1

□ CIV-51 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CIV-51 thru CIV-52.1

□ CIV-277 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CIV-277 thru CIV-278.1

□ CIV-397 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CIV-397 thru CIV-398.1

□ CIV-489 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CIV-489 thru CIV-490.1

FI–11



FILE IN THE FRONT OF THE FIRST VOLUME

OF YOUR SET

To order missing pages log on to our self service center, www.lexisnexis.com/printcdsc orcall Customer Services at 1 (800) 833-9844 and have the following information ready:

(1) the publication title;

(2) specific volume, chapter and page numbers; and

(3) your name, phone number, and Matthew Bender account number.

Please recycle removed pages.

MISSING FILING INSTRUCTIONS?

FIND THEM AT www.lexisnexis.com/printcdsc

Use the search tool provided to find and download missing filing instructions,

or sign on to the Print & CD Service Center to order missing pages or

replacement materials. Visit us soon to see what else

the Print & CD Service Center can do for you!

www.lexis.com

Copyright © 2019 Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a member of the LexisNexis Group.

Publication 410, Release 202, June 2019

LexisNexis, the knowledge burst logo, and Michie are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under

license. Matthew Bender is a registered trademark of Matthew Bender Properties Inc.

FI–12

