(Montalk.net) Research Notes: Law of Attraction vs Law of Awareness

7/17/2019 (Montalk.net) Research Notes: Law of Attraction vs Law of Awareness

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/montalknet-research-notes-law-of-attraction-vs-law-of-awareness 1/6

(montalk.net) Research Notes: Law of Attraction vs Law of

Awareness

The Law of Attraction says that you synchronistically attract from the

outside what you resonate with on the inside, or that you can bring

into your life what you momentarily strongly focus upon. So by having an optimistic

attitude and focusing on success one attracts these, while having a cynical depressedattitude attracts negative experiences.

At the same time, however, experience shows that negative possibilities manifest when

we least expect them, that anticipating them is what actually keeps them from

happening.

So how can focusing on negative possibilities attract them in one case, and prevent

them in another? That is the paradox to address in this article.

All we have to do is look at some typical cases and find the one rule that accounts for

them all. Consider the following:

You think in a matter-of-fact way about everything that could go wrong, and find

that by doing so things actually turn out surprisingly well.

You adopt an optimistic happy-go-lucky attitude and pretty soon positive

opportunities come to you synchronistically.

You consciously intend for safe passage or protection and receive it.

You experience the one accident or problem you didn’t expect.

You have a gnawing dread that things will go wrong, but ignore this feeling and

avoid thinking about it, and sure enough things do go wrong.

You have a deep-seated fear, your mind is constantly preoccupied with all the

ways this fear can come true, and soon the very thing you feared does indeed

manifest.

You have an optimistic attitude but ignore thinking about negative possibilities,

and eventually something bad happens that you are not prepared to handle.

I have experienced all of these myself and know plenty of others who have as well. Sothese cases can be taken as factual data points. Each represents one expression of a

single unified reality principle. By pondering what they all have in common and how

they all differ, it is possible to piece together the principle.



To me it all boils down to this:

When you expect various negative possibilities, are you merely aware of them, or do

you really believe deep down that they are inevitable and therefore dread them in some

way? The difference is between prudence and paranoia, between mental anticipation

and emotional investment.

You can be aware of a negative possibility while having zero emotional investment in it,

like casually crossing the street after having looked both ways to avoid getting hit, yet

without a single pang of fear as a young child might have when crossing alone for the

first time. And you can be in emotional resonance with something while not even

thinking about it consciously, like having deeply suppressed issues gnawing away atyour subconscious despite your denying them on the surface.

Let’s see how this applies to the various cases:

You think in a matter-of-fact way about everything that could go wrong, and

find that by doing so things actually turn out surprisingly well.

You adopt an optimistic happy-go-lucky attitude and pretty soon positive

opportunities come to you synchronistically.

You consciously intend for safe passage or protection and receive it.



You experience the one accident or problem that you did not expect.

You have a gnawing dread that things will go wrong, but ignore this feelingand avoid thinking about it, and sure enough things do go wrong.

You have a deep-seated fear, your mind is constantly preoccupied with allthe ways this fear can come true, and soon the very thing you feared does

indeed manifest.

You have an optimistic attitude but ignore thinking about negative

possibilities, and eventually something bad happens that you are not

prepared to handle.



In summary, while the Law of Attraction explains how you attract resonant experiences,its counterpart the Law of Awareness explains how you constrict the possible range of

experiences.

The Technical Stuff

You might be wondering why precisely awareness selects while emotional resonance

attracts. My intuitive impression is that quantum mechanics plays a role. When a

quantum system is not observed, it stays in a fluid wave state spread across aspectrum of probabilities. But when one observes or tries to measure it, the wave

collapses into a single tangible state. Conscious observation turns a fluid probability

wave into a definite tangible particle. Well on the macroscopic scale, where we are the

observers and a quantum system is our entire bubble of personal reality, the rules are

fuzzier and more complex.

When you become aware of a probable future, you are observing it, but only partially

because it is not a certainty. But whereas observing a quantum wave in the present

collapses it into a definite state, observing a wave still in the future merely constricts it

a little, reducing its fluidity and therefore interfering with its ability to manifest

synchronistically in the present. Synchronicity is how the future becomes the present

through an entirely quantum process. The more certain you are that a particular future

will happen, the more that future is frozen and kept from manifesting through quantum

/ synchronistic means. This simply implies that instead of coming to you

synchronistically , you would have to go toward it causally . For instance, synchronicity

could unexpectedly bring you a hundred dollars if given freedom to flow toward you, or

you could work for several hours to earn it as expected. It’s like waiting at the end of a

river to intercept a raft versus freezing the river and walking towards the raft. So this is

why awareness blocks, selects, and filters — because it freezes the future. That is

good if you want to freeze out negative futures, but not good if eager anticipation

shuts out positive futures.

There is also a bit of Timeline Dynamics involved here. If a certain future involves you

getting sideswiped by negative forces, then that future has a good probability of

happening. That makes it a stronger future, whose feedback effects travel back into

the present and attract you toward it. For instance, you might feel a mental tug to do

http://montalk.net/matrix/122/timeline-dynamics



something, to forget something, commit an error, etc… that results in getting

unexpectedly ambushed. But if you become aware of the attack ahead of time, then

that prepares you to successfully handle it and utterly demolishes the future where you

were hit out of the blue. This cuts off the feedback loop from that future, which then

frees you mentally and emotionally from its pressure in the present. That is why if you

are under hyper-dimensional attack, very often the moment you become aware of the

real reason for what is happening, and especially if you realize what the negative forces

have planned, suddenly all the negative psychic pressure lifts and the threat

evaporates. Through awareness, you literally “head off” the negative future. It’s like the

saying, “To never have to use a weapon, have one handy.”

As for how your internal resonance attracts corresponding probable futures, that is

more a phenomenon of Realm Dynamics. It is entirely a quantum thing, because the

attracted experiences always manifest synchronistically. Whereas conscious

awareness decreases quantum fluidity, subconscious resonance increases thepressure behind any quantum fluidity that does exist, thereby heightening

synchronistic manifestation. It is no surprise then that consciousness constricts while

the subconscious attracts; the conscious mind to the subconscious is what the

particle is to its wave. In fact, certain shamanic techniques employing “second

attention” appear to be methods for intentionally delocalizing the conscious focal point

so that one perceives more the fluid / quantum nature of things than the single tangible

slice we know as physical reality.

When your mind is delocalized, such as when you are coming out of sleep and

thoughts are still highly nonlinear (and before you feel yourself “compressed” back

into your body), that is when using the Law of Attraction works really well. Also, you

may have noticed how when you have a passing thought about something you need, a

thought that you quickly forget about, very often those tend to materialize most

quickly and magically. Because not only were you entirely absorbed in the thought, but

you were also in a slight trance state (mental delocalization), and afterwards forgotabout it, so that anticipation did not block its outcome. And from a higher perspective,

it is a pure and unselfish act when you ask for something from the depths of your heart

this way without being self-conscious or commanding.

The Cassiopaeans advised people to always expect attack, that knowledge protects

and ignorance endangers, and that having a happy-go-lucky attitude and practicing

non-anticipation of positive things opens the flow for their manifestation. I did not grok

this stuff until realizing it myself years later after much observation and pondering,

afterwards understanding in retrospect why what the Cassiopaeans said was good and

self-consistent advice.

There is the issue of whether simply being aware, being non-anticipatory, and having a

http://montalk.net/matrix/112/realm-dynamics



higher soul vibration through spiritual devotion is enough to make everything fall into

place — whether intentionally engaging in reality creation by visualizing and energizing

desired futures is even necessary. The latter gets into the sticky territory of black

magic if done too often, too selfishly, and too intensely, whereby the higher flow of

things is forcefully twisted to serve egotistical ends. I think that a humble approach

that does not trivialize one’s own spiritual sovereignty is a balanced approach, one that

recognizes that active reality creation (through visualization and so on) is a

supplementary tool to be used only when necessary, and that it is the consistent

fundamental modes of awareness, attitude, and action that count most.

Documents

(Montalk.net) Research Notes: Law of Attraction vs Law of Awareness