42
Models of service quality

Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Models of service quality

Page 2: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

The evolution ofservice quality

Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model of service quality &

SERVQUAL

Page 3: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Disconfirmation of expectations (Oliver 1980)

Page 4: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Frequently Asked QuestionsAbout Customer Expectations

Should a company aim to ‘delight’ the customer?

How does a company exceed customer service expectations?

Do customer service expectations continually escalate?

Is it a better strategy to under-promise and over-deliver?

How does a service company stay ahead of competition in meeting customer expectations?

Page 5: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

The Nordic model (Gronroos 1990)

Represents the service experience on the basis of functional and technical elements

Technical quality refers to what the customer receives from the service

Functional quality refers to service delivery Model emphasises companies must be careful what

they promise

Page 6: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

The three-component model Rust & Oliver (1994)

Source: Rust & Oliver, 1994. p. 11

Page 7: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Customer expectations of service Types of expectations customers hold for

service performance Sources of customer expectations

Page 8: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Possible Levels of Customer Expectations

Page 9: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Dual customer expectations levels and the Zone of Tolerance

Adequate Service

Desired Service

Zone ofTolerance

Page 10: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Reliability Tangibles

Level of

Expectation

Source: L. L. Berry, A. Parasuraman, and V. A. Zeithaml, “Ten Lessons for Improving Service Quality,” Marketing Science Institute, Report No. 93-104 (May 1993).

Adequate ServiceAdequate Service

Desired ServiceDesired Service

Desired Service

Adequate Service

Zones of Tolerance for DifferentService Dimensions

Zone of

Tolerance

Zoneof

Tolerance

Page 11: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Lasting ServiceIntensifiers

Lasting ServiceIntensifiers

Personal NeedsPersonal NeedsZone

of Tolerance

Desired Service

Adequate Service

Factors That Influence Desired Service

Page 12: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Self-PerceivedService Role

Self-PerceivedService Role

Situational Factors

Situational Factors

Perceived ServiceAlternatives

Perceived ServiceAlternatives

Temporary ServiceIntensifiers

Temporary ServiceIntensifiers

Zone of

Tolerance

Desired Service

Adequate Service

Factors That Influence Adequate Service

PredictedService

PredictedService

Page 13: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Predicted Service

Explicit ServicePromises

Explicit ServicePromises

Implicit ServicePromises

Implicit ServicePromises

Word-of-MouthWord-of-Mouth

Past ExperiencePast ExperienceZone

of Tolerance

Desired Service

Adequate Service

Factors That Influence Desired and Predicted Service

Page 14: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Customer perceptions

Factors which influence consumers’ perceptions

Factors which influence satisfaction Dimensions of service quality Service encounters

Page 15: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Customer Perceptions of Quality and Customer Satisfaction

Page 16: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Factors Influencing Customer SatisfactionProduct/service qualitySpecific product or service featuresConsumer emotionsAttributions for service success or failure

Page 17: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Factors Influencing Customer Satisfaction Perceptions of equity or fairness Other consumers, family members, and

coworkers Price Personal factors

the customer’s mood or emotional state situational factors

Page 18: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Outcomes of Customer SatisfactionIncreased customer retentionPositive word-of-mouth communicationsIncreased revenues

Page 19: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Service Quality

The customer’s judgment of overall excellence of the service provided in relation to the quality that was expected.

Service quality assessments are formed on judgments of:outcome quality interaction qualityphysical environment quality

Page 20: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

The SERVQUAL dimensions – Perceived Service Quality (Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry 1988) Reliability (dependability, accurate performance)

Assurance (competence, courtesy, credibility & security)

Tangibles (appearance of physical elements)

Empathy (easy access, good communications & customer

understanding)

Responsiveness (promptness & helpfulness)

Page 21: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

The Five Dimensions of Service Quality

Ability to perform the promised service dependably and accurately.

Knowledge and courtesy of employees and their ability to inspire trust and confidence.

Physical facilities, equipment, and appearance of personnel.

Caring, individualized attention the firm provides its customers.

Willingness to help customers and provide prompt service.

Tangibles

Reliability

Responsiveness

Assurance

Empathy

Page 22: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Exercise to Identify Service AttributesIn groups of five, choose a services industry and spend 10 minutes brainstorming specific requirements of customers in each of the five service quality dimensions. Be certain the requirements reflect the customer’s point of view.

Reliability:

Assurance:

Tangibles:

Empathy:

Responsiveness:

Page 23: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Providing service as promised Dependability in handling customers’

service problems Performing services right the first time Providing services at the promised time Maintaining error-free records

Keeping customers informed as to when services will be performed

Prompt service to customers Willingness to help customers Readiness to respond to customers’

requests

RELIABILITY

RESPONSIVENESS

Employees who instill confidence in customers

Making customers feel safe in their transactions

Employees who are consistently courteous Employees who have the knowledge to

answer customer questions

ASSURANCE

Giving customers individual attention Employees who deal with customers in a

caring fashion Having the customer’s best interest at heart Employees who understand the needs of

their customers Convenient business hours

EMPATHY

Modern equipment Visually appealing facilities Employees who have a neat,

professional appearance Visually appealing materials

associated with the service

TANGIBLES

SERVQUAL Attributes

Page 24: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

The Service Encounteris the “moment of truth”occurs any time the customer interacts with the firm

can potentially be critical in determining customer satisfaction and loyalty

types of encounters: remote encounters, phone encounters, face-to-face encounters

is an opportunity to: build trust reinforce quality build brand identity increase loyalty

Page 25: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Check-InCheck-In

Request Wake-Up CallRequest Wake-Up Call

CheckoutCheckout

Bellboy Takes to Room Bellboy Takes to Room

Restaurant MealRestaurant Meal

A Service Encounter Cascadefor a Hotel Visit

Page 26: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Sales CallSales Call

Ordering SuppliesOrdering Supplies

BillingBilling

Delivery and Installation Delivery and Installation

ServicingServicing

A Service Encounter Cascade for an Industrial Purchase

Page 27: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Critical Service Encounters ResearchGOAL:

understanding actual events and behaviors that cause customer dis/satisfaction in service encounters

METHOD:Critical Incident Technique

DATA:stories from customers and employees

OUTPUT: identification of themes underlying satisfaction and

dissatisfaction with service encounters

Page 28: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Sample Questions for Critical Incidents Technique Study

Think of a time when, as a customer, you had a particularly satisfying (dissatisfying) interaction with an employee of ______________.

When did the incident happen?

What specific circumstances led up to this situation?

Exactly what was said and done?

What resulted that made you feel the interaction was satisfying (dissatisfying)?

Page 29: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Common Themes in CriticalService Encounters Research

Recovery: Adaptability:

Spontaneity:Coping:

employee responseto service delivery

system failure

employee responseto customer needs

and requests

employee responseto problem customers

unprompted andunsolicited employeeactions and attitudes

Page 30: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Recovery

Acknowledge problemExplain causesApologizeCompensate/upgradeLay out optionsTake responsibility

Ignore customerBlame customerLeave customer to fend

for him/herselfDowngradeAct as if nothing is

wrong “Pass the buck”

DO DON’T

Page 31: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Adaptability

Recognize the seriousness of the need

AcknowledgeAnticipateAttempt to accommodateAdjust the systemExplain rules/policiesTake responsibility

IgnorePromise, but fail to follow

throughShow unwillingness to tryEmbarrass the customerLaugh at the customerAvoid responsibility “Pass the buck”

DO DON’T

Page 32: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Spontaneity

Take timeBe attentiveAnticipate needsListenProvide informationShow empathy

Exhibit impatience IgnoreYell/laugh/swearSteal from customersDiscriminate

DO DON’T

Page 33: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Coping

ListenTry to accommodateExplainLet go of the customer

Take customer’s dissatisfaction personally

Let customer’s dissatisfaction affect others

DO DON’T

Page 34: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Evidence of Service from theCustomer’s Point of View

People

Process PhysicalEvidence

Contact employees Customer him/herself Other customers

Operational flow of activities

Steps in process

Flexibility vs. standard

Technology vs. human

Tangible communication

Servicescape

Guarantees

Technology

WebsiteSource: From “Managing the Evidence of Service” by M. J. Bitner from The Service Quality Handbook, eds. E. E. Scheuing and W. F. Christopher (1993), pp. 358-70.

Page 35: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

UNDERSTANDING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS

UNDERSTANDING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS

Page 36: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Company Perceptions of

Consumer Expectations

Expected Service

CUSTOMER

COMPANYListening

Gap

Provider Gap 1

Part 3 Opener

Page 37: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Listening to customers through market research

Using Marketing Research to Understand Customer Expectations

Elements in an Effective Services Marketing Research Program

Analyzing and Interpreting Marketing Research Findings

Model Services Marketing Research Programs Using Marketing Research Information Upward Communication

Page 38: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Objectives for Chapter 6:Listening to Customers through ResearchPresent the types of and guidelines for marketing research in services.

Show how marketing research information can and should be used for services.

Describe the strategies by which companies can facilitate interaction and communication between management and customers.

Present ways that companies can and do facilitate interaction between contact people and management.

Page 39: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Common Research Objectives for ServicesTo discover customer requirements or expectations for service.To monitor and track service performance.To assess overall company performance compared with that of

competition.To assess gaps between customer expectations and

perceptions.To identify dissatisfied customers, so that service recovery can

be attempted.To gauge effectiveness of changes in service delivery.To appraise the service performance of individuals and teams

for evaluation, recognition, and rewards.To determine customer expectations for a new service.To monitor changing customer expectations in an industry.To forecast future expectations of customers.

Page 40: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Criteria for an EffectiveService Research ProgramIncludes both qualitative and quantitative researchIncludes both expectations and perceptions of customers

Balances the cost of the research and the value of the information

Includes statistical validity when necessaryMeasures priorities or importance of attributesOccurs with appropriate frequencyIncludes measures of loyalty, behavioral intentions, or actual behavior

Page 41: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Stages in the Research ProcessStage 1 : Define Problem

Stage 2 : Develop Measurement Strategy

Stage 3 : Implement Research Program

Stage 4 : Collect and Tabulate Data

Stage 5 : Interpret and Analyze Findings

Stage 6 : Report Findings

Page 42: Models of service quality. The evolution of service quality Disconfirmation of expectations The Nordic model The three component model The Gaps model

Portfolio of Services Research

Customer Complaint Solicitation

“Relationship” Surveys

Post-Transaction Surveys

Customer Focus Groups

“Mystery Shopping” of Service Providers

Employee Surveys

Identify dissatisfied customers to attempt recovery; identify most common categories of service failure for remedial action

Obtain customer feedback while service experience is fresh; act on feedback quickly if negative patterns develop

Use as input for quantitative surveys; provide a forum for customers to suggest service-improvement ideas

Assess company’s service performance compared to competitors; identify service-improvement priorities; track service improvement over time

Measure individual employee service behaviors for use in coaching, training, performance evaluation, recognition and rewards; identify systemic strengths and weaknesses in service

Measure internal service quality; identify employee-perceived obstacles to improve service; track employee morale and attitudes

Determine the reasons why customers defect

Research Objective Type of Research

Lost Customer Research

Future Expectations ResearchForecast future expectations of customers; develop and test new service ideas