56
Modeling of Welding Processes through Order of Magnitude Scaling Patricio Mendez, Tom Eagar Welding and Joining Group Massachusetts Institute of Technology MMT-2000, Ariel, Israel, November 13-15, 2000

Modeling of Welding Processes through Order of Magnitude Scaling

  • Upload
    janae

  • View
    26

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Modeling of Welding Processes through Order of Magnitude Scaling. Patricio Mendez, Tom Eagar Welding and Joining Group Massachusetts Institute of Technology MMT-2000, Ariel, Israel, November 13-15, 2000. What is Order of Magnitude Scaling?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • Modeling of Welding Processes throughOrder of Magnitude ScalingPatricio Mendez, Tom EagarWelding and Joining GroupMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyMMT-2000, Ariel, Israel, November 13-15, 2000

  • What is Order of Magnitude Scaling?OMS is a method useful for analyzing systems with many driving forces

  • What is Order of Magnitude Scaling?OMS is a method useful for analyzing systems with many driving forcesWeld pool

  • What is Order of Magnitude Scaling?OMS is a method useful for analyzing systems with many driving forcesWeld poolArc

  • What is Order of Magnitude Scaling?OMS is a method useful for analyzing systems with many driving forcesWeld poolElectrode tipArc

  • OutlineContext of the problemSimple example of OMSApplications to WeldingDiscussion

  • Context of the Problem

  • Context of the ProblemPhilosophyArtsScienceEngineering

  • Context of the ProblemScienceEngineeringPhilosophyArtsScienceEngineeringPhilosophyArts~1700

  • Context of the ProblemScienceEngineeringPhilosophyArtsScienceEngineeringPhilosophyArtsEngineeringScienceFundamentalsApplications~1700~1900

  • Context of the ProblemScienceEngineeringPhilosophyArtsScienceEngineeringPhilosophyArtsScienceEngineeringGap is gettingtoo large!FundamentalsApplications~1700~1900~1980

  • Example: Modeling of an Electric ArcVery complex process:Fluid flow (Navier-Stokes)Heat transferElectromagnetism (Maxwell)It is very difficult toobtain general conclusions with too many parameters

    Chart1

    1

    1

    2

    2

    8

    8

    10

    11

    12

    14

    20

    14

    14

    Squire 1951(analytical)

    Maecker 1955 (approximate)

    Shercliff 1969 (analytical)

    Yas'ko 1969 (dimensional analysis)

    Ramakrishnan 1978

    Glickstein 1979

    Hsu 1983

    McKelliget 1986

    Choo, 1990

    Lee 1996

    Kim 1997

    Lowke 1997

    year of publication

    number of dimensionless groups (m)

    Sheet1

    19511Squire

    19691Shercliff

    19512Squire

    19552Maecker

    19788Ramakrishnan

    19798Glickstein

    196910Yas'ko

    198311Hsu

    198612McKelliget

    199014Choo

    199720Lowke

    199714Kim

    199614Lee

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • Example: Modeling of an Electric ArcComplexity of the physics increased substantially

  • Generalization of problems with OMSFundamentals

  • Generalization of problems with OMSFundamentalsDifferential equations

  • Generalization of problems with OMSFundamentalsDifferential equationsAsymptotic analysis(dominant balance)

  • Generalization of problems with OMSFundamentalsDifferential equationsAsymptotic analysis(dominant balance)Engineering

  • Generalization of problems with OMSFundamentalsDimensional analysisDifferential equationsAsymptotic analysis(dominant balance)Engineering

  • Generalization of problems with OMSMatrix algebraFundamentalsDimensional analysisDifferential equationsAsymptotic analysis(dominant balance)Engineering

  • Generalization of problems with OMSMatrix algebraFundamentalsDimensional analysisDifferential equationsAsymptotic analysis(dominant balance)EngineeringArtificial Intelligence

  • Generalization of problems with OMSMatrix algebraFundamentalsDimensional analysisDifferential equationsAsymptotic analysis(dominant balance)EngineeringOrder of Magnitude ReasoningArtificial Intelligence

  • Generalization of problems with OMSMatrix algebraFundamentalsDimensional analysisDifferential equationsAsymptotic analysis(dominant balance)EngineeringOrder of Magnitude ReasoningArtificial IntelligenceOrder of MagnitudeScaling

  • OMS: a simple example

    X = unknown

    P1, P2 = parameters (positive and constant)

  • Dimensional Analysis in OMS

    There are two parameters: P1 and P2:n=2

  • Dimensional Analysis in OMS

    There are two parameters: P1 and P2:n=2Units of X, P1, and P2 are the same:k=1 (only one independent unit in the problem)

  • Dimensional Analysis in OMS

    There are two parameters: P1 and P2:n=2Units of X, P1, and P2 are the same:k=1 (only one independent unit in the problem)Number of dimensionless groups:m=n-km=1 (only one dimensionless group) P=P2/P1 (arbitrary dimensionless group)

  • Asymptotic regimes in OMS

    There are two asymptotic regimes:Regime I: P2/P1 0Regime II: P2/P1

  • Dominant balance in OMS

    There are 6 possible balancesCombinations of 3 terms taken 2 at a time:

  • Dominant balance in OMS

    There are 6 possible balancesCombinations of 3 terms taken 2 at a time: One possible balance:

  • Dominant balance in OMS

    There are 6 possible balancesCombinations of 3 terms taken 2 at a time: One possible balance:

  • Dominant balance in OMS

    There are 6 possible balancesCombinations of 3 terms taken 2 at a time: One possible balance: P2/P1 0 in regime I

  • Dominant balance in OMS

    There are 6 possible balancesCombinations of 3 terms taken 2 at a time: One possible balance: P2/P1 0 in regime IX P1 in regime I

  • Dominant balance in OMS

    There are 6 possible balancesCombinations of 3 terms taken 2 at a time: One possible balance: P2/P1 0 in regime IX P1 in regime Inatural dimensionless group

  • Properties of the natural dimensionless groups (NDG)Each regime has a different set of NDGFor each regime there are m NDG All NDG are less than 1 in their regimeThe edge of the regimes can be defined by NDG=1The magnitude of the NDG is a measure of their importance

  • Estimations in OMS

    For the balance of the example:

    In regime I:estimation

  • Corrections in OMS CorrectionsDimensional analysis states:

    correction function

  • Corrections in OMS CorrectionsDimensional analysis states:

    Dominant balance states:

    when P2/P10correction function

  • Corrections in OMS CorrectionsDimensional analysis states:

    Dominant balance states:

    Therefore:when P2/P10correction functionwhen P2/P10

  • Properties of the correction functionsProperties of the correction functionsThe correction function is 1 near the asymptotic caseThe correction function depends on the NDGThe less important NDG can be discarded with little loss of accuracyThe correction function can be estimated empirically by comparison with calculations or experiments

  • Generalization of OMSThe concepts above can be applied when:The system has many equationsThe terms have the form of a product of powersThe terms are functions instead of constantsIn this case the functions need to be normalized

  • Application of OMS to the Weld Pool at High CurrentDriving forces:Gas shearArc PressureElectromagnetic forcesHydrostatic pressureCapillary forcesMarangoni forcesBuoyancy forcesBalancing forcesInertialViscous

  • Application of OMS to the Weld Pool at High CurrentGoverning equations, 2-D model (9) :conservation of mass Navier-Stokes(2)conservation of energyMarangoniOhm (2)Ampere (2)conservation of charge

  • Application of OMS to the Weld Pool at High CurrentGoverning equations, 2-D model (9) :conservation of mass Navier-Stokes(2)conservation of energyMarangoniOhm (2)Ampere (2)conservation of chargeUnknowns (9):Thickness of weld poolFlow velocities (2)PressureTemperatureElectric potentialCurrent density (2)Magnetic induction

  • Application of OMS to the Weld Pool at High CurrentParameters (17):L, r, a, k, Qmax, Jmax, se, g, n, sT, s, Pmax, tmax, U, m0, b, wsReference Units (7):m, kg, s, K, A, J, VDimensionless Groups (10)Reynolds, Stokes, Elsasser, Grashoff, Peclet, Marangoni, Capillary, Poiseuille, geometric, ratio of diffusivity

  • Application of OMS to the Weld Pool at High CurrentEstimations (8):Thickness of weld poolFlow velocities (2)PressureTemperatureElectric potentialCurrent density in XMagnetic induction

  • Application of OMS to the Weld Pool at High Current

  • Application of OMS to the Weld Pool at High CurrentRelevance of NDG (Natural Dimensionless Groups)

  • Application of OMS to the ArcDriving forces:Electromagnetic forcesRadialAxialBalancing forcesInertialViscous

  • Application of OMS to the ArcIsothermal, axisymmetric modelGoverning equations (6):conservation of massNavier-Stokes(2)Ampere (2)conservation of magnetic fieldUnknowns (6)Flow velocities (2)PressureCurrent density (2)Magnetic induction

  • Application of OMS to the ArcParameters (7): r, m, m0 , RC , JC , h, Ra Reference Units (4):m, kg, s, ADimensionless Groups (3)Reynoldsdimensionless arc lengthdimensionless anode radius

  • Application of OMS to the ArcEstimations (5):Length of cathode regionFlow velocities (2)PressureRadial current density

  • Application of OMS to the ArcVZP

  • Application of OMS to the ArcComparison with numerical simulations:

  • Re

    RC

    ZS

  • Application of OMS to the ArcCorrection functions

  • Application of OMS to the ArcVR(R,Z)/VRS200 A10 mm2160 A70 mm

  • ConclusionOMS is useful for:Problems with simple geometries and many driving forcesThe estimation of unknown characteristic valuesThe ranking of importance of different driving forcesThe determination of asymptotic regimesThe scaling of experimental or numerical data

    Now its even hard to apply 1900s physics.We can model complex problems, but still cant understand them well.

    Put them on the internet