Mitigation Plan for Four New Jersey Counties Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment prepared for:...
If you can't read please download the document
Mitigation Plan for Four New Jersey Counties Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment prepared for: Camden, Cumberland, Gloucester, and Salem Counties prepared
Mitigation Plan for Four New Jersey Counties Hazard
Identification & Risk Assessment prepared for: Camden,
Cumberland, Gloucester, and Salem Counties prepared by: Stuart
Wallace, LLC March 11-12, 2015
Slide 2
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment Stuart Wallace, CFM
Since 1980: Landscape Architect Civil Engineer Comprehensive Land
Use Planner (AICP) Since 1999: Emergency Management Planning &
Training Consultant Certified Floodplain Manager (CFM) Since 2014:
Stuart Wallace, LLC 2
Slide 3
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment Stuart Wallace, CFM
Consultant Lead for FEMA HMP guidance & training Coordinated
reviews of 100s of HMPs for FEMA Regions Managed projects resulting
in dozens of approved HMPs 3
Slide 4
Clarify contents of NJ4 HMP Provide support for implementing
risk reduction measures Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment
Workshop Purpose 4
Slide 5
HIRA, as required by DMA 2000, provides valuable information
for HMP implementation: Public outreach and education Public
outreach and education Setting priorities Setting priorities
Documenting benefits for grant applications Documenting benefits
for grant applications HIRA value depends on acquiring, compiling,
and accessing new and changing information about risk Hazard
Identification & Risk Assessment Workshop Context 5
Slide 6
Definitions DMA 2000 HIRA Requirements NJ4 HMP HIRA Results
HIRA Uses HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Resources
What are your expectations for this session? Hazard Identification
& Risk Assessment Discussion Topics Outline 6
Definitions Risk Source: FEMA Local Mitigation Planning
Handbook 8
Slide 9
Definitions Natural vs. Man-made Hazards Natural Hazards versus
Man-made (or Human- caused) Hazards DMA 2000 specifically refers to
natural hazards DMA 2000 specifically refers to natural hazards
Certain man-made hazards can be treated like natural hazards (e.g.,
dam or levee failure, accidental hazardous materials releases)
Certain man-made hazards can be treated like natural hazards (e.g.,
dam or levee failure, accidental hazardous materials releases)
Intentional acts (e.g., cyber disruption, IEDs, etc.) require
fundamentally different methods to assess risk Intentional acts
(e.g., cyber disruption, IEDs, etc.) require fundamentally
different methods to assess risk 9
Slide 10
Definitions Other Hazard Distinctions Geospecific versus
Non-geospecific Hazards Geospecific hazards like dam failures and
floods occur in predictable locations Geospecific hazards like dam
failures and floods occur in predictable locations Non-geospecific
hazards like earthquakes, high wind events, and winter storms can
cause building failures across broad regions but have predictable
magnitudes Non-geospecific hazards like earthquakes, high wind
events, and winter storms can cause building failures across broad
regions but have predictable magnitudes 10
Slide 11
Definitions Other Hazard Distinctions Mitigation versus
Response & Recovery Hazards like floods can potentially be
mitigated Hazards like floods can potentially be mitigated Hazards
like aircraft crashes can be prepared for but generally not
mitigated Hazards like aircraft crashes can be prepared for but
generally not mitigated 11
Slide 12
Definitions Risk Assessment Steps Hazard Identification natural
hazards your community is susceptible to Hazard Profiles what
hazards can do to physical, social, and economic assets
Vulnerability Assessment determining how assets are
exposed/vulnerable to damage Loss Estimation the cost of damages or
potential losses avoided Note: terminology and process descriptions
vary ! 12
DMA 2000 HIRA Requirements DMA 2000 Chronology Disaster
Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) Public Law 106-930, signed
October 10, 2000, amended the Stafford Act of 1988 (i.e., statutory
authority for most Federal disaster response activities, especially
for FEMA) Public Law 106-930, signed October 10, 2000, amended the
Stafford Act of 1988 (i.e., statutory authority for most Federal
disaster response activities, especially for FEMA) Section 322
included requirement for hazard mitigation planning at state and
local levels Section 322 included requirement for hazard mitigation
planning at state and local levels FEMA produced Interim Final Rule
(IFR) in 2002 including 201.6 identifying required HMP content
14
Slide 15
DMA 2000 HIRA Requirements DMA 2000 Overview HMPs must be
prepared in a manner consistent with DMA 2000 requirements (per IFR
201.6) prepared in a manner consistent with DMA 2000 requirements
(per IFR 201.6) adopted by each individual jurisdiction adopted by
each individual jurisdiction approved by SHMOs and FEMA Regions
approved by SHMOs and FEMA Regions to preserve eligibility for FEMA
Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) federal grants HMPs must be
updated every five years (local and multijurisdictional) and again
adopted and approved 15
Slide 16
DMA 2000 HIRA Requirements IFR HIRA Requirements Interim Final
Rule Requirement 201.6(c) Plan content: The plan shall include the
following: (2)A risk assessment that provides the factual basis for
activities proposed in the strategy to reduce losses from
identified hazards. Local risk assessments must provide sufficient
information to enable the jurisdiction to identify and prioritize
appropriate mitigation actions to reduce losses from identified
hazards. 16
Slide 17
DMA 2000 HIRA Requirements IFR HIRA Requirements IFR
Requirement 201.6(c)(2) (contd): The risk assessment shall include:
(i)A description of the type, location, and extent of all natural
hazards that can affect the jurisdiction. The plan shall include
information on previous occurrences of hazard events and on the
probability of future hazard events. 17
Slide 18
DMA 2000 HIRA Requirements IFR HIRA Requirements IFR
Requirement 201.6(c)(2) (contd): The risk assessment shall include:
(ii)A description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the
hazards described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section. This
description shall include an overall summary of each hazard and its
impact on the community. All plans approved after October 1, 2008
must address NFIP insured structures that have been repetitively
damaged by floods. 18
Slide 19
DMA 2000 HIRA Requirements IFR HIRA Requirements IFR
Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii) (contd): The plan should describe
vulnerability in terms of: (A)The types and numbers of existing and
future buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities located
in the identified hazard areas; (B)An estimate of the potential
dollar losses to vulnerable structures identified in paragraph
(c)(2)(ii)(A) of this section and a description of the methodology
used to prepare the estimate; 19
Slide 20
DMA 2000 HIRA Requirements IFR HIRA Requirements IFR
Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii) (contd): The plan should describe
vulnerability in terms of: (C)Providing a general description of
land uses and development trends within the community so that
mitigation options can be considered in future land use decisions.
20
Slide 21
DMA 2000 HIRA Requirements IFR HIRA Requirements IFR
Requirement 201.6(c)(2) (contd): The risk assessment shall include:
(iii)For multi-jurisdictional plans, the risk assessment section
must assess each jurisdiction's risks where they vary from the
risks facing the entire planning area. 21
Slide 22
DMA 2000 HIRA Requirements IFR HIRA Requirements The IFR
intentionally uses the words shall and should for specific
elements. Where results are dependent on data that may or may not
readily exist, the IFR purposefully uses the word should to
acknowledge the potential difficulty in meeting these quantitative
requirements. 22
Slide 23
DMA 2000 HIRA Requirements Other Specific Requirements FEMA
Region II Conditions of Approval reiterates basic requirements such
as include and use the most current and readily available data but
also emphasizes the need to clearly relate the risks from natural
hazards to each jurisdiction. 23
Slide 24
DMA 2000 HIRA Requirements Expectations Original expectations
for HIRAs in HMP and HMP updates assumed available data for all
hazards (i.e., besides flooding) would be continuously improved
through on-going plan maintenance. This expectation has not been
met for a variety of good and bad reasons. How does a lack of
detailed hazard data limit the effectiveness of HMPs? 24
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Geospecific Hazards Six of the 12 NJ4 HMP
natural hazards occur in predictable locations: Coastal Erosion and
Sea Level Rise Dam Failure Levee Failure Flood Geologic Hazards
(landslides, sinkholes) Wildfire 26
Slide 27
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Coastal Erosion and Sea Level Rise FEMA
Risk MAP data used to show parcels and critical facilities
potentially vulnerable to inundation if rising sea levels increase
Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) by +1, +2, and +3 feet 27
Slide 28
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Dam & Levee Failure Inundation zones
from NJDEP high hazard dam EAPs used to show vulnerable parcels and
critical facilities USDA levee inventory locations used to identify
vulnerable parcels and critical facilities 28
Slide 29
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Flood FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRMS) (*) used to show parcels and critical facilities within
designated flood zones (*) Effective FIRMS used for assessment and
Preliminary FIRMS was also included for coastal communities 29
Slide 30
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Wildfire USDA and NJ Fire Service data
used to show parcels and critical facilities in areas with high
fuel potential and close proximity to development 30
Slide 31
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Non-Geospecific Hazards The other six NJ4
HMP natural hazards occur across the entire region but can be
assessed based on potential impacts: Drought Extreme Temperature
Earthquake High Wind Severe Weather - Summer Severe Weather -
Winter 31
Slide 32
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Drought & Extreme Temperature NJDEP
data regarding percent of agricultural land use was used to
determine relative risk to drought Extreme temperature assessment
considered age and income distributions to acknowledge at-risk
individuals 32
Slide 33
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Earthquake US Census data was used to
identify population density and the age of building stock to
indicate areas with potentially higher risk 33
Slide 34
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results High Wind US Census data and design wind
speed zones (per the ASCE) were used to identify age of building
stock and anticipated wind forces to indicate areas with
potentially higher risk 34
Slide 35
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Severe Weather - Summer NJDEP data
regarding percent of agricultural land use and US Census data on
age of building stock were combined to identify areas with
potentially higher relative risk from hail or lightning 35
Slide 36
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Severe Weather - Winter NJ State
Climatologist historical snow depth data and US Census data on age
of building stock were combined to identify areas with potentially
higher relative risk of damage to structures from heavy snow loads
36
Slide 37
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Relative Risk Assessment The HIRA process
for the twelve natural hazards resulted in an objective risk
assessment with high, medium, low, or N/A designations Example
shown is for Coastal Erosion and Sea Level Rise 37
Slide 38
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Relative Risk Assessment The Municipal
Working Group Work Sessions included subjective risk assessment
results based on the experience and expertise of the group Example
shown is for Coastal Erosion and Sea Level Rise 38
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Relative Risk Assessment The objective
results for all twelve natural hazards were also combined to
provide one simple result regarding overall relative risk in the
NJ4 HMP Region 40
Slide 41
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Critical Facility Hazard Exposure Critical
facilities for each municipality were inventoried and mapped using
GIS and manual processes Example shown is for Salem County
municipal critical facility locations Note: See separate Workshop
Session re: CF Hazard Exposure Assessment 41
Slide 42
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Critical Facility Hazard Exposure CF
locations were compared with geospecific hazard zones for each
jurisdiction. Results formed the basis for follow-up site and
facility evaluations. What value could these inventories have
beyond mitigation? 42
Slide 43
Data limitations are common in four main areas: Damage
histories Data availability / changes Asset locations Asset
attributes NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Data Limitations Overview 43
Slide 44
To produce detailed HIRA results with associated dollar value
loss estimates, site and facility damage histories are needed
including: Direct damages to assets Loss of service Cost of
response, restoration, and recovery Other than NFIP flood insurance
claims, this information is not usually acquired, compiled, or
accessible NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Damage Histories 44
Slide 45
Information is not always available when plans are developed or
updated. For example, Risk MAP results for increased inundation
zones were only available for Cumberland and Salem counties. The
same information for Camden and Gloucester Counties should be
incorporated into HIRA when available from FEMA. Information used
in the HIRA may change within a five-year update period. For
example, sea level rise estimates can change as better information
and predictive techniques are developed. NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Data
Availability / Changes 45
Slide 46
For geospecific hazards, lack of building footprint data
requires using less accurate parcel or census block data to
determine relative risk within different hazard zones (floodplains,
storm surge categories, wildfire fuel, etc.) Initial critical
facilities data was inaccurate and did not include GPS (x,y)
coordinates. As part of the NJ4 HMP HIRA, nearly 1,000 critical
facilities were geocoded and then manually edited to position
coordinates to exact locations. NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Asset
Locations 46
Slide 47
Even when building footprint data is available there may be
limited attribute data. The NJ4 HMP HIRA could be improved
significantly with the following asset attribute data: Structure
type Building replacement value Building contents value Age and
condition of the structure Square footage First floor elevations
(to compare with BFEs) Damage history NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Asset
Attributes 47
Slide 48
The Draft Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan including Section 3:
HIRA can be viewed and downloaded at http://nj4hmp.com/draft-
regional-hazard- mitigation-plan/ http://nj4hmp.com/draft-
regional-hazard- mitigation-plan/ http://nj4hmp.com/draft-
regional-hazard- mitigation-plan/ What value do these assessments
have for your municipality? NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Regional Hazard
Mitigation Plan 48
NJ4 HMP HIRA Results Public Outreach and Education Mitigation
Measure #1 refers to outreach and education including providing
information about current hazards and risk to property owners For
example, information about the potential for increased inundation
would be useful for property owners to understand future risk
implications 50
Slide 51
HIRA Uses Setting Priorities HMP monitoring, evaluation, and
updates require periodically identifying and confirming priorities
which can be based on HIRA information 51
Slide 52
HIRA Uses HMP Updates HIRA-related issues that would prompt /
support HMP Updates include: Has a natural disaster occurred?
Should the list of hazards be modified? Are there new hazard data
sources or revisions to existing data? Has new development occurred
that could be at risk? Has the status of repetitively flooded
properties changed? 52
Slide 53
HIRA Uses Documenting Potential Benefits Most federal and state
hazard mitigation grant programs require a comparison of potential
benefits to costs Costs are the total of preparation and
construction costs for a proposed mitigation measure Benefits are
the potential losses avoided by implementing a mitigation measure.
The determination of losses avoided is most easily accomplished by
looking at what has already happened (damage histories). 53
Slide 54
HIRA Uses Documenting Losses Avoided For future reference and
refinement of HIRA results, it is important to document losses
avoided after a mitigation measure is in place Similar to potential
benefits, documenting losses avoided is based on past histories of
damages for the asset that has been mitigated Which (if any) of
these uses meets your needs? 54
Slide 55
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Hazard
Identification & Risk Assessment 55
Slide 56
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Issues /
Categories Issues: What types of data What types of data How
options for acquiring information How options for acquiring
informationCategories: NJ4 HMP HIRA Results NJ4 HMP HIRA Results
Assets Assets Hazard Events / Problem Areas Hazard Events / Problem
Areas Changing Conditions Changing Conditions 56
Slide 57
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access NJ4 HMP HIRA
Results What? For public outreach and education, determining
priorities, supporting funding options, and updating HMPs Hazard
Histories Hazard Histories Hazard Extent and Magnitude Hazard
Extent and Magnitude Loss Estimates Loss Estimates 57
Slide 58
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access NJ4 HMP HIRA
Results How? NJ4 HMP Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 3:
HIRA - Project Website @ http://nj4hmp.com/draft-regional-hazard-
mitigation-plan/ http://nj4hmp.com/draft-regional-hazard-
mitigation-plan/ http://nj4hmp.com/draft-regional-hazard-
mitigation-plan/ GIS and mapping Municipal and/or County planning /
GIS staff (to be determined) 58
Slide 59
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Assets What?
Asset locations to compare with known hazards Asset attributes
relative to identified hazards and as needed to maintain critical
and essential functions Structure Structure Equipment Equipment
Site Site Access Access 59
Slide 60
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Assets How?
Asset locations GPS / smartphones, handheld units GPS /
smartphones, handheld units Street addresses / Geocoding software
and websites (search: find latitude and longitude) Street addresses
/ Geocoding software and websites (search: find latitude and
longitude) Asset attributes Record documents (building permits /
CDs) Record documents (building permits / CDs) Existing periodic
inspections Existing periodic inspections Site and Facility
Assessments See Critical Facility Workshop and Webinars Site and
Facility Assessments See Critical Facility Workshop and Webinars
60
Slide 61
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Hazard Events
What? Hazard Events to improve documentation for funding options
and plan updates Frequency Frequency Extent / Magnitude Extent /
Magnitude 61
Slide 62
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Hazard Events
How? Available information after hazard events Personal and
organizational logs Personal and organizational logs Local weather
stations Local weather stations Weather reports and records per NWS
/ NOAA Weather reports and records per NWS / NOAA Preliminary
Damage Assessments (PDAs) / Project Worksheets (PWs) Preliminary
Damage Assessments (PDAs) / Project Worksheets (PWs) Disaster
declarations Disaster declarations 62
Slide 63
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Problem Areas
What? Problem Areas to improve documentation for funding options
and coordination of operations Repetitive property flooding
Repetitive property flooding Drainage Drainage Coordinated dam
releases Coordinated dam releases 63
Slide 64
How? Available information before, during, after events: NFIP
Flood Insurance claims Damages for uninsured properties See NFIP /
Repetitive and Severe Repetitive Loss Properties Workshop and
Webinars HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Repetitive
Property Flooding 64
Slide 65
How? Available information before, during, after events: Is
problem area located on an emergency evacuation route? Number of
one-way traffic trips per day (preferably documented by a
professional engineer, planner, or county official) Direct physical
damages caused by each event (for both Presidential Disaster
Declarations and non-declared events) HIRA Data Acquisition,
Compilation, and Access Drainage Problems 65
Slide 66
How? Available information (continued): Direct and indirect
costs of response and recover Length of time roadways were closed
Number of homes cut off by road closure (number of structures and
population) Additional time delays and/or additional travel miles
due to detours (if detours are available) Source of flooding and
photographs HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Drainage
Problems (continued) 66
Slide 67
How? Available information re: dams before events: Dams located
on common streams and drainage ways Ownership Dam configurations
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Coordinated Dam
Releases 67
Slide 68
How? Available information re: dams before events: Holding
capacity and depth / volume relationships Capacity and flow
characteristics of streams and drainage ways between dams
Downstream obstructions (levees, tidal waterways, etc.) HIRA Data
Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Coordinated Dam Releases
68
Slide 69
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Changing
Conditions What? Regulatory requirements that affect HIRA results
and priorities Flood zones Flood zones Dam classifications Dam
classifications Available Data information that is subject to
change over time Development patterns Development patterns Sea
level rise Sea level rise 69
Slide 70
How? Available information for NJ4 HMP jurisdictions via the
FEMA Flood Map Service Center @http://msc.fema.gov/portal
http://msc.fema.gov/portal Flood Insurance Studies Flood Insurance
Rate Maps (FIRMs) Letters of Map Change (LOMC) GIS databases HIRA
Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Flood Zones 70
Slide 71
How? Available information (eventually) for NJ4 HMP
jurisdictions via FEMA Region IIs Coastal Analysis and Mapping @
http://www.region2coastal.com/ http://www.region2coastal.com/ Flood
Risk Map Flood Risk Database (including Changes since Last FIRM,
Areas of Mitigation Interest, Flood Depth and Analysis Grids, Flood
Risk Assessment Data) HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and
Access Flood Zones 71
Slide 72
How? On-going revisions to FIRMs in the coastal communities in
NJ4 HMP will culminate (in the near future) in adoption of new
Effective FIRMs See NFIP / Repetitive and Severe Repetitive Loss
Properties Workshop and Webinars See FEMA Flood Risk Open Houses
Camden County on March 25th Gloucester County on March 26 th HIRA
Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Flood Zones 72
Slide 73
How? The NJ4 HMP dam failure risk assessment included
evaluating the risk to high hazard dams. A change in classification
may impact which dams are evaluated in future plan updates There is
no set criteria for requesting a change to the high, significant,
and low hazard classifications HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation,
and Access Dam Classifications 73
Slide 74
How? Request for hazard classification can be initiated by the
NJDEP Dam Safety possibly as part of a dam rehabilitation project
or from the dam owners engineer Depending on the risk downstream of
the dam, acceptable documentation to justify a change in
classification can range from a few photographs and structure
elevations to an H & H study HIRA Data Acquisition,
Compilation, and Access Dam Classifications 74
Slide 75
How? Available information includes: Development approvals
Development approvals Building permits Building permits Aerial
photogrammetry Aerial photogrammetry HIRA Data Acquisition,
Compilation, and Access Development Patterns 75
Slide 76
Available information for Sea Level Rise: National Climate
Assessment http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/
http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Changehttp://www.ipcc.ch/ http://www.ipcc.ch/ NOAA Tidal Gauges
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/ http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/
NOAA Digital Coast http://coast.noaa.gov/slr/
http://coast.noaa.gov/slr/ USGS Sea Level Rise
http://cegis.usgs.gov/ http://cegis.usgs.gov/ Surging Seas
http://sealevel.climatecentral.org/
http://sealevel.climatecentral.org/ Rutgers NJ Flood Mapper
http://slrviewer.rutgers.edu/ http://slrviewer.rutgers.edu/ Jacques
Cousteau NERRhttp://jcnerr.org/ http://jcnerr.org/
http://www.midatlanticocean.org/022013_NewJersey.pdf
http://www.midatlanticocean.org/022013_NewJersey.pdf HIRA Data
Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Sea Level Rise 76
Slide 77
How do we access this information? Use tools as-is on websites
Contact project manager and explain your needs. How do we use this
information? 1. Understand your situation Life span of program/
buildingLife span of program/ building Parameters: Cost, Policies,
Community Restrictions, etc.Parameters: Cost, Policies, Community
Restrictions, etc. 2. Identify future changes Current hazards and
vulnerabilitiesCurrent hazards and vulnerabilities Relation to
projectionsRelation to projections 3. Update planning to include
future changes HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Sea
Level Rise 77
Slide 78
1. Monitor NOW using NOAAs tidal gauges 2. Predict FUTURE using
National Climate Assessment projections for global sea level rise
3. Understand LOCAL RISK using Surging Seas HIRA Data Acquisition,
Compilation, and Access Sea Level Rise 78
Slide 79
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Shared
Responsibilities Preceding identifies basic issues related to:
What? What? How? How? Still need to identify: Who? Who? When? When?
79
Slide 80
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Shared
Responsibilities Acquisition - Best accomplished by the end user,
i.e., municipalities Compilation and Access Options include:
Individual municipalities with GIS / IT capabilities Individual
municipalities with GIS / IT capabilities Groups of municipalities
with common issues (e.g., dam coordination efforts) Groups of
municipalities with common issues (e.g., dam coordination efforts)
County and regional partners County and regional partners State
agencies and organizations State agencies and organizations 80
Slide 81
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Shared
Responsibilities Who do you think can help with each of these key
steps: Property Owners Property Owners Municipalities
Municipalities Counties Counties State State Who can be and/or
should be in charge? 81
Slide 82
HIRA Data Acquisition, Compilation, and Access Other
Considerations Reduce redundant and inconsistent hazard assessments
for HMPs, EOPs, recovery plans, master plans, flood and stormwater
management plans and ordinances, et al: Expand NJ4 HMP HIRA to
include manmade and technological hazards and identify impacts and
consequences Expand NJ4 HMP HIRA to include manmade and
technological hazards and identify impacts and consequences
Maintain resulting assessment annually coordinated with updated
information available from county, state, and federal sources
Maintain resulting assessment annually coordinated with updated
information available from county, state, and federal sources Cross
reference assessment into all documents during periodic updates
Cross reference assessment into all documents during periodic
updates 82
Resources Available Guidance FEMA State and Local Mitigation
Planning how-to Guides Volume 2 (Publication 386-2) Volume 2
(Publication 386-2) Worksheets 1, 2, 3a, 3b, & 4 Worksheets 1,
2, 3a, 3b, & 4 84
Slide 85
Resources Available Guidance FEMA Local Mitigation Planning
Handbook Task 5 Task 5 85
Slide 86
Resources Available Training Programs FEMAs Emergency
Management Institute E-176 HAZUS MH for Floodplain Managers E-176
HAZUS MH for Floodplain Managers E-296 - Application of HAZUS-MH
for Risk Assessment E-296 - Application of HAZUS-MH for Risk
Assessment E-299 Risk MAP Process and Tools E-299 Risk MAP Process
and Tools et al et al 86
Slide 87
Resources Technical Resources In-House Planning, GIS,
architecture, engineering, public works, permitting &
inspections Planning, GIS, architecture, engineering, public works,
permitting & inspections Partners State agencies including
NJOEM re: DMA 2000 requirements & grant programs; NJDEP re:
NFIP, floodplain management, & flood mapping State agencies
including NJOEM re: DMA 2000 requirements & grant programs;
NJDEP re: NFIP, floodplain management, & flood mapping Regional
planning, non-profit organizations, and academia for risk analysis
expertise Regional planning, non-profit organizations, and academia
for risk analysis expertise 87
Slide 88
Resources Technical Resources Consultants Specialists in FEMA
program-related risk assessment techniques and requirements (e.g.,
HAZUS-MH, Risk MAP, benefit-cost analysis) Specialists in FEMA
program-related risk assessment techniques and requirements (e.g.,
HAZUS-MH, Risk MAP, benefit-cost analysis) 88
Slide 89
Resources Technical Resources What technical resources are
currently used by your community? In-house In-house Partners
Partners Consultants Consultants What other resources are available
in your community? 89
Slide 90
Questions? Stuart Wallace, CFM Stuart Wallace, LLC 304.377.7586
[email protected]