% of Change on Good Site

Non-Productive

Land***

Counties Fair Good Excellent Fair Good Excellent $/Acre

Accomack 304 443 599 281 411 555 -7 100Albemarle (Piedmont)* 265 393 432 270 393 426 0 75Albemarle (Mountain)* 173 258 282 182 270 296 5 75Alleghany 176 262 287 185 275 301 5 75Amherst (Piedmont)* 275 408 448 279 406 440 0 65Amherst (Mountain)* 179 267 292 188 279 306 5 65Augusta 180 268 293 189 281 308 5 75Bedford (Piedmont)* 352 500 580 350 497 577 -1 75Bedford (Mountain)* 180 268 294 190 282 309 5 75Bland 164 243 283 171 253 293 4 75Botetourt 175 260 285 183 272 298 5 75Campbell 353 502 582 350 498 578 -1 100Caroline 376 529 637 374 528 634 0 100Carroll (hdwd) 162 241 280 169 250 291 4 75Carroll (wp)** 212 486 905 204 483 908 -1 75Chesterfield 365 514 619 365 514 618 0 100Clarke 175 260 285 184 273 299 5 100Culpeper 267 396 435 273 397 431 0 100Cumberland 339 482 559 336 478 555 -1 100Dinwiddie 462 632 777 469 640 788 1 100Essex 371 523 630 369 520 625 -1 100Fairfax 255 379 416 260 378 410 0 100Fauquier (Piedmont)* 259 384 422 264 384 417 0 100Fauquier (Mountain)* 169 251 275 178 265 290 5 100Fluvanna 263 390 428 267 388 421 -1 75Franklin (Piedmont)* 350 499 578 348 495 575 -1 75Franklin (Mountain)* 166 246 286 173 256 297 4 75Frederick 180 267 293 189 281 308 5 100Giles 166 246 286 171 254 295 3 75Gloucester 381 537 647 379 535 643 0 100Goochland 276 409 449 281 409 444 0 100Greene (Piedmont)* 266 395 434 272 395 429 0 100Greene (Mountain)* 174 239 277 183 248 288 4 100Hanover 374 526 634 374 528 634 0 75Henrico 371 522 629 371 523 628 0 100Henry (Piedmont)* 353 502 582 352 501 581 0 65Henry (Mountain)* 167 248 288 175 259 300 4 65Isle of Wight 468 641 787 473 645 795 1 100James City 374 527 635 373 526 632 0 75King George 389 547 659 387 546 656 0 75King William 373 525 632 372 525 630 0 75Loudoun (Piedmont)* 250 371 408 256 372 404 0 100Loudoun (Mountain)* 163 243 266 173 256 281 5 100Louisa 269 399 438 273 398 432 0 100Madison (Piedmont)* 267 397 436 272 396 430 0 100Madison (Mountain)* 175 260 285 183 272 298 5 100Middlesex 393 553 666 391 552 663 0 100Montgomery 158 235 273 164 243 282 4 65Nelson (Piedmont)* 266 395 434 271 394 428 0 100Nelson (Mountain)* 174 259 284 183 272 297 5 100

Commonwealth of Virginia2020 Forest Land Use Values - Land Use Assessment Law

2019 Values 2020 Suggested Values

SLEAC Approved 9/11/19

1

% of Change on Good Site

Non-Productive

Land***

Counties Fair Good Excellent Fair Good Excellent $/Acre

New Kent† 373 526 633 372 525 630 0 100Northampton† 294 429 580 271 398 536 -7 100Northumberland 395 557 670 392 554 665 -1 100Orange 265 393 432 270 393 426 0 100Page 176 261 286 184 273 299 5 100Pittsylvania 349 496 575 345 491 570 -1 100Powhatan 332 472 547 330 469 544 -1 100Prince George 459 628 772 466 637 785 1 100Prince William 254 377 414 259 376 408 0 75Pulaski 164 243 283 171 253 293 4 65Rappahannock (Piedmont)* 268 397 436 272 396 430 0 100Rappahannock (Mountain)* 175 260 285 183 272 298 5 100Richmond 382 538 648 379 535 643 -1 100Roanoke 165 245 269 174 258 283 5 65Rockbridge 176 262 286 184 274 300 5 100Rockingham 178 264 289 186 277 303 5 100Russell 165 245 285 172 254 295 4 75Shenandoah 179 266 292 188 279 305 5 100Smyth 162 241 280 169 250 291 4 75Southampton 460 630 774 469 640 788 2 100Spotsylvania 265 393 431 270 393 427 0 100Stafford 258 383 420 263 383 416 0 75Tazewell 165 245 285 172 255 296 4 75Warren 178 265 290 188 279 305 5 100Washington 165 245 284 172 254 295 4 75Westmoreland 392 552 665 390 550 660 0 75

CitiesChesapeake 445 609 748 453 619 762 2 100Danville 339 483 560 337 480 557 -1 100Franklin 451 617 758 457 624 768 1 100Fredericksburg 266 395 434 272 395 429 0 75Harrisonburg 176 261 286 184 273 299 5 100Lynchburg (Piedmont)* 252 374 411 257 373 405 0 75Lynchburg (Mountain)* 165 245 268 173 257 282 5 75Petersburg 339 478 575 338 477 573 0 100Radford 160 238 276 167 247 287 4 75Staunton 168 249 273 177 262 287 5 75Suffolk 446 610 750 452 617 760 1 100Virginia Beach 454 622 764 462 631 777 1 100Waynesboro 174 258 283 183 271 297 5 75

1.66 Avg. Change

† New Kent and Northampton has Agricultural/Forestal Districts only

** White Pine Management

Prepared by the Virginia Department of Forestry - August 2019

* These counties have a Mountain Land value and a Piedmont Land value because there are both types of land within the countyboundaries. So affected counties will be able to choose which value to use based on the property location.

***A value is suggested for non-productive forest land. This is land devoted to forest use but not capable of growing a crop of treesfor commercial industrial use. Examples of this type of forest land are inaccessibility, steep outcrops or rock and shallow soil onsteep mountain sides, excessive steepness, heavily eroded areas, coastal beach sand, tidal marsh, etc.

Commonwealth of Virginia2020 Forest Land Use Values - Land Use Assessment Law

2019 Values 2020 Suggested Values

SLEAC Approved 9/11/19

2