Miller and Long Expose

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    1/16

    Deaths, Illeal & Leal Prolemsmiller & long ConCreTe ConsTruCTion , inC.

    Reporting on Safety, Productivity, and Honesty in the Construction Industry.

    Miller& long ConCrete ConstruCtion, inC., issue no. 1

    Modern day slavery? M&L hires illeal worers,convicts, then it loies Conress to lealie scam

    Is Miller & Longa company with-

    out a country?See Editorial, pae 14

    Some 90 percent of Miller & Long

    Concrete Constructions 3,000 employ-

    ees may be illegal Immigrants, judging

    from a recent New York Times report

    and police accounts of major arrests of

    Miller & Long workers.

    Additionally, others in the remain-

    ing 10 percent of Miller & Longs

    work force are ex-convicts who have

    either termed-out or been paroled from

    hard-time prison sentences for crimessuch as robbery, assault and theft, the

    Washington Postreports.

    Miller & Long is not particularly

    ashamed of this. Record show the com-

    pany is spending thousands of dollars

    lobbying Congress to legalize in the

    future some of the things considered il-

    legal today.

    In fact Miller & Long brags to the

    press about its special relationship with

    illegal immigrants and ex-cons two

    groups that tend to be so grateful to be out

    10 years o OSHA saety violations here,ut where did the other 50 years o?

    Between Jan. 25, 1998 and Aug.

    28, 2007, OSHA visited numerous

    Miller & Long work sites which

    resulted in the company being cited

    for 68 safety violations including one

    death and several injury accidents,

    the Occupational Safety and HealthAdministration (OSHA) reported.

    ALSO

    INSIDE

    Details of Miller

    & Longs deadly

    safety history

    PAGES

    6 - 10

    INSIDE

    THIS ISSUE

    The Contractors Critic

    10

    11

    11

    12

    MarCh 2008

    of the Third World or the Big House

    that they would not dare to beg for a

    living wage, or for a 40-hour work

    week, or overtime.

    It has delegated a high-ranking

    company ofcial human resources

    Mysteriously, OSHA has appar-

    ently deleted from its les all prior

    safety reports involving Miller &

    Long, since none can be found from

    1997 all the way back to when the

    company opened in the 1940s.

    modern day slavery

    contd next page

    safeTy reporTs contd page 6

    Editorial

    Source notes

    Corporate Information

    LASER Information

    14

    16

    16

    16

    OSHA chart

    Driver accident

    Accident claims

    Miller & Long litigation

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    2/16

    director Myles Gladstone to exploit this

    questionable business.

    It also has retained the Capitol Hill

    consulting rm of Akerman, Senterttto lobby to make their activities legal in

    the future.

    You may ask: How can a little con-

    crete company thumb its nose at authori-

    ties and spend tens of thousands of dollars

    buying politicians? Well, Miller & Long is

    not so little. It is listed as one of, if not the,

    largest concrete rm in the nation.

    According to the summer 2006 issue

    ofMid-Atlantic Construction (an industry

    publication), Miller & Long had revenuesof $372 million, while second-ranked On-

    core Construction took in $58.4 million.

    Records also showed Miller & Long

    has completed more than $5 billion in

    projects and poured 12 million-plus cubic

    yards of concrete in that time frame, MAC

    reported.

    The story of how Miller & Long ig-

    nores the law and exploits workers gets

    bigger and seamier the more one looks

    into it.Let us begin with a look into the much

    reported travels of Miller & Longs head

    personnel ofcer to devastated lands for

    the little disguised purpose of luring des-

    titute individuals to the U.S. by promising

    them the jobs the company has been busy

    booting American citizens out of.

    Consider this glowing April 15, 2006

    article from theNew York Times: Myles

    Gladstone is a burly, silver-haired busi-

    nessman who spends most days in a hardhat, striding through crushed gravel at

    construction sites, greeting workers and

    elding complaints.

    But on Monday, Mr. Gladstone, 59,

    who typically spends his free time col-

    lecting antique jukeboxes for his home

    in Potomac, an afuent Maryland suburb,

    was caught up in the political ferment

    sweeping the nation as he joined the

    throngs of immigrants demonstrating

    here. He said he could not afford to

    simply stand by.As the vice president for human

    resources of Miller & Long, a regional

    concrete construction company, Mr.

    Gladstone is responsible for a mainly

    immigrant work force. Nearly 90 percent

    of the companys 3,000 employees are

    immigrants, mostly from El Salvador,

    he said. And the tough border security

    bill passed by the House in December,

    which would make illegal immigration

    a felony, could disrupt his companysoperations if it becomes law.

    So when he heard about the dem-

    onstration to protest the legislation, Mr.

    who describes Gladstone as a genia

    manager who wears a BlackBerry on

    his hip.

    Like many businessmen withlargely immigrant work forces, he sai

    he did not know whether his employee

    were illegal immigrants or whether they

    had relatives who were here illegally.

    Mr. Gladstone said the worker

    all claimed to be here legally and ha

    all presented documentation to prov

    they were authorized to work in th

    United States. But he also knows ther

    is a growing industry in counterfei

    documents, and he and other employercannot help but view the tough immi

    gration measures under consideratio

    in Congress with unease, the Time

    MODERN DAY SLAVERYcontd from front page

    modern day slavery

    contd next page

    NEARLY 90 PERCENT O THE COMPANYS3,000 EMPLOYEES ARE IMMIgRANTS, MOSTLYROM EL SALVADOR...Gladstone and other company ofcials

    decided to offer employees a day of

    unpaid leave to attend the rally and push

    for a bill that would legalize illegal im-

    migrants. To show additional support,

    he attended the protest himself.

    We are indebted to the work

    ethic they bring us, Mr. Gladstone said.

    Without them, Miller & Long would

    not be as successful, and I would not

    be as successful.Native Americans, Puritan Yankees,

    African-Americans and even Hispanic-

    Americans all of whom had ancestors in

    this land before the American Revolu-

    tion are just too damn lazy to work, is

    Mr. Gladstones undisguised message.

    But hes such a nice guy! exudes

    the starry-eyedNew York Times reporter,

    reported.

    This is very interesting, inasmuch

    as further down in the story Gladston

    brags to theNew York Times reporte

    that since the 2001 earthquake in E

    Salvador he has traveled to the county

    21 times to distribute food and cloth

    ing to the families of employees and

    to oversee the construction of a health

    clinic.

    Such glad-handing tours to starving nations are not to be confused with

    recruiting missions. We know thi

    because Mr. Gladstone has assured u

    that he does not know how any of th

    2,700 El Salvadorians on his payrol

    2 | The ConTraCTors CriTiC march 2008

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    3/16

    actually got there.

    Lavish in its praise of Mr. Gladstone

    as a human resources director for Miller &

    Long, the Times article also mentions that

    he and Miller & Long President, Nicholas

    G. Paleologos, were such swell guys that

    they were persuaded to allow their work-

    ers to protest at a demonstration against

    a proposed vote in the U.S. Senate to

    toughen border and immigration laws.

    Giving their illegal workers time off

    to pack a demonstration is not the only

    way Miller & Longs management seeks

    to inuence Congress. They do it the old-

    fashioned way with money, too.

    And their timing sould not be better. It

    seems, by sheer coincidence, at the same

    time the laws to toughen immigration

    policies and policing were being proposed

    in the U.S. House and Senate, the amount

    of funds Miller & Long lobbyists primed

    politicians with zoomed from almost

    nothing in 2005 to some $130,000 in 2006

    and then to somewhere around $220,000

    in 2007.Youve heard of politicians glad-

    handing contributors? This new move

    by Miller & Long might also be termed

    Gladstoning the politicians.

    Those numbers were drawn from

    documents registered lobbyists are re-

    quired to le with the Clerk of the House

    of Representatives and the Secretary of

    the Senate. The reporting documents in-

    tentionally keep the amounts couched in

    very general and obscure terms so preciseamounts would not be available, even if

    they were in fact reported.

    TheNew York Times is not the only

    mainstream media outlet that primps

    and preens Miller & Long. The Wash-

    ington Postdoes it, too.

    Get a load of this Washington Post

    July 10, 2005 article about how kindly

    Miller & Long has given Kenneth

    Boo Glover, a hardened criminal

    who has spent most of his life, juve-

    nile and adult, in one prison system

    or another.

    Guys call it doing life on the in-

    stallment plan cycling in and out of

    prison, all your sorry life, Washington

    Postwriter Neely Tucker writes.

    Glovers adult arrests ranged from

    disorderly conduct to robbery, from

    cocaine to assault. From 1988 to 1996

    the hapless Glover was arrested 31

    times resulting in 62 charged offenses

    in eight years.

    His last felony gig was for holding

    up a gift shop on K Street in the middle

    of the day while high on crack, the pa-

    per reported. For that he took a six-year

    fall in the federal slammer.

    One must digress here. K Street in

    Washington, DC, is the national Holy

    Land for lobbyists. These lobbyists

    help steal billions of dollars from the

    public purse to benet their clients and

    then happily retire with millions for

    themselves. Poor, unemployed Boo

    Glover on the other hand plies his own

    much lower-end brand of thievery on the

    same K Street and does hard time for it

    Doesnt seem fair, does it?

    Anyway, Glover eventually gets

    MODERN DAY SLAVERYcontd from page 2

    modern day slavery

    contd next page

    WHEN TOUgHER IMMIgRATION POLICIES AND POLICINg WERE bEINgPROPOSED IN CONgRESS, THE AMOUNT O UNDS MILLER & LONgSLObbYISTS PRIMED POLITICIANS WITH zOOMED ROM ALMOSTNOTHINg IN 2005 TO SOMEWHERE AROUND $220,000 IN 2007

    mILLer & Long concrete conStrUctIon, Inc., ISSUe no. 1 | 3

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    4/16

    MODERN DAY SLAVERYcontd from page 3

    sprung and is back on the street, but hav-

    ing glimpsed God he vows to go straight.

    Church groups lasso him in. Get him a

    schedule and somehow Miller & Longlearns about him and gives him, as Neely

    Tucker of the Washington Post reports,

    a chance to get ahead paying his

    tuition paying him to attend, a car-

    in the construction industry.

    It would be unfair of us to casti-

    gate Mr. Gladstones helping hand to

    Mr. Glover, if it was just one of thosehappenstance charitable gestures most

    people succumb to once in a blue

    moon. But in this case it is part of an

    orchestrated plan by Miller & Long and

    One can just picture the prisoners

    eyes bugging out at that prospect.

    But there was a catch, Milloy

    admitted.We start our day at 7 a.m. If you

    come at 7:01 a.m. youre late, Glad

    stone said. Weve had people living

    within eyesight of the job and couldn

    get there on time. We even bought som

    of them alarm clocks, and then theyd

    say the battery ran out or the electricity

    was turned off. In the last two years, we

    have offered employment to or actually

    hired 200 people. Of that number only

    two are still working for us today.Having read all that good new

    about Miller & Long, we at Th

    Contractors Critic would like Mr

    Gladstone to answer a few questions

    with accompanying proof: Is Kenneth

    Boo Glover still with the rm? Can

    we have the names of its non-manage

    ment employees who actually were

    able to retire with close to a million

    bucks and some proof of how close to

    a million it was?Gladstones admission to th

    Washington Postthat only two of the

    200 entry level employees were stil

    working for us today brings up an

    other important issue involved in Mille

    & Longs massive program of worke

    exploitation.

    What about all those Central Amer

    icans Gladstone has own down to E

    Salvador to lure to the U.S.? Where ar

    they now? Not a few are in jail awaiting deportation following a hit-and-run

    accident in North Carolina.

    As WRAL TV in Raleigh, N.C

    reported in May 2006, At least 15

    undocumented workers are in cus

    modern day slavery

    contd next page

    IN MAY 2006 AT LEAST 15 UNDOCUMENTEDWORkERS WERE APPREHENDED DURINg AN

    IMMIgRATION RAID AT A MILLER & LONg jObSITE IN RALEIgH, N.C.

    pentry class Amalgamated Builders and

    Contractors.

    However, other industry statistics

    generally support the contention that

    participants of the ABC apprenticeship

    program have a slim chance reaching

    that goal.

    Worker-trainees gambling on thispromissory come line to borrow the

    crapshooters term are discarded more

    often than not. They are dumped just

    as they approach graduation time and

    replaced by fresh optionless down-and-

    out suckers.

    By the way, the Washington Post

    subsequently published this correction to

    the Neely Tucker article about Glover: A

    July 10 Style article about former inmate

    Kenneth Glover incorrectly identifiedthe organization that runs a carpentry

    program in which he was enrolled. It is

    the Associated Builders and Contractors,

    Inc., not the Amalgamated Builders and

    Contractors.

    Associated Builders and Contractors,

    of course, ABC is the most active and

    notoriously pro-low wage lobbying group

    Gladstone, the director of its human

    resources department a term that

    chillingly reminds a reader of min-

    ing resources and ocean sh stocks

    resources. Objects, not people.

    Washington Postwriter Courtland

    Milloy wrote in his Nov. 30, 2005, ar-

    ticle Opportunity Knocks Hard at JailJobs Fair, that Gladstone was a gleeful

    participant of the event.

    Myles Gladstone, a vice president

    at Miller & Long Concrete Construction

    Co., brought good news to job seekers.

    The D.C.-based company is the largest

    concrete subcontractor in the United

    States, with more than 3,000 employees

    and about $400 million in construction

    work expected to begin soon, Milloy

    gushed, and he quoted Gladstone.Our minimum wage is $10.50 an

    hour; none of our employees makes

    less than that, he told them (inmates).

    We also have a great benets package,

    plus prot-sharing plan that has allowed

    some of our employees to retire with

    close to a million bucks, Milloy quotes

    Gladstone as saying.

    4 | The ConTraCTors CriTiC march 2008

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    5/16

    tody after an early-morning raid in west

    Raleigh. The raid stems from a trafc

    accident that tied up trafc for hours on

    Interstate 40 during Mondays morningcommute.

    Work to add seating to the west

    end zone of Carter-Finely stadium was

    halted as immigration and customs

    enforcement ofcers executed the raid

    Tuesday. The workers had been hired by

    Miller and Long construction agency to

    renovate the stadium, in a $19 million

    upgrade by the Wolfpack Club.

    Authorities discovered the illegal

    hot spot while tracking three undocu-mented people who were involved in

    an I-40 accident The accident left a

    minivan on its side and tied up trafc for

    hours in the eastbound lanes.

    Although the driver, who authori-

    ties said caused the accident, ed the

    scene, troopers questioned the other

    three passengers. They did not have doc-

    uments or identication to prove their

    citizenship and they were released. The

    driver has not been located. State Rep.Russell Calls said troopers should have

    not allowed the undocumented men to

    leave the accident scene. He said he will

    use the incident as an example of how

    North Carolina law enforcement should

    have been more involved in detaining

    and tracking illegal immigrants.

    When El Diario de Hoy in El Salva-

    dor replayed theNew York Times story

    about Mr. Gladstones many trips their

    helping earthquake victims (not to bemistaken, please, for recruiting workers,

    thank you) the working of its Spanish

    translation of the story described Myles

    Gladstone as un corpulento empresario

    de cabello plateado.

    Translated back into English that

    comes out, a fat boss with a silver

    head.

    MODERN DAY SLAVERYcontd from page 4

    Fat boss. Now does that sound

    like the El Salvadorians are grateful to

    Mr. Gladstone, or more like that they are

    using him, as he is using them to meetgoals that are, in fact, unlawful, illegal

    and immoral in the U.S. to which is

    whispering his invitation and bragging

    about it to the newspapers?

    Shameless is too mild a word for

    Gladstone and Miller & Long. Looked

    at with a cold, dispassionate eye, Miller

    & Longs hiring practices amount to

    little more than a modern spin on the

    slavery trade.

    Which brings us to that group ofAmerican workers who are probably the

    most aware of what slavery is, no matter

    how bosses try to soft-sell it: African-

    Americans.

    Washington Postcolumnist Court-

    land Milloy writes an April 12, 2006

    article, Work Ethic, Not Latinos, is Job

    Barrier:

    A young black man gets a job as a

    laborer on a construction site in down-

    town Washington. He is not mentally or physically prepared for the hard, dirty

    work ahead. Nor does he have a clue

    about the rewards of perseverance. So

    he wakes up the next morning, aching

    and demoralized. He shows up late for

    work and eventually stops showing up

    altogether.

    Meanwhile, a vanload of Latinos

    pulls up to a job site. Only one speaks

    English and serves as a translator. They

    work as a team with near reckless aban-don, hardly stopping for lunch. Before

    long, they are earning overtime pay.

    Here The Contractors Critic would

    like to note that this reckless abandon

    the Washington Postproudly proclaims,

    is precisely the sort of so-called work

    ethic that leads to the kinds of injury ac-

    cidents, industrial deaths and safety vio-

    lations the federal Occupational Safety

    and Health Administration (OSHA)

    reports nding at Miller & Long job

    sites listed elsewhere in this newslet-ter, as well as unreported incidents in

    which construction materials were

    dropped on passersby, trucks ipped

    over and vehicles collided causing

    injuries and deaths.

    Working faster and cheaper and

    with reckless abandon for Miller &

    Long does not always turn out to be

    a benet.

    Be that as it may, let us return now

    to Mr. Gladstones pontical musingswith the Washington Post: I have seen

    these circumstances unfold and know

    construction site supervisors who

    have made similar observations. So

    I am skeptical of claims that Latinos

    are taking jobs away from African-

    Americans, which is a complaint that

    has resurfaced during the recent debate

    over restricting immigration.

    Of course, there are African

    American successes in the constructiontrades. But there are troubling excep-

    tions. For lack of even a rudimentary

    education and, more fundamentally

    the absence of family and community

    support, far too many young black men

    are unable to compete for jobs.

    If the same effort to stop illega

    immigrants were being used to end

    say, illiteracy, then more people migh

    be able to understand that ignorance is

    the greatest threat to our national secu-rity. Stop the disproportionately high

    dropout rates among black high schoo

    students and the odds of getting a job

    instead of going to jail improve.

    When we visit the homes of our

    modern day slavery

    contd next page

    mILLer & Long concrete conStrUctIon, Inc., ISSUe no. 1 |

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    6/16

    employees, we nd that Latino workers

    have much more family support, more

    intact families, than African Ameri-

    can workers, said Myles Gladstone,vice president for human resources at

    Miller & Long Concrete Construction,

    the largest concrete contractor in the

    country. When it comes to African

    American workers, retention is a huge

    problem, and part of the reason is a

    lack of support.

    One blogger at blaqblog.com was

    incensed by Milloys article. (NOTE:

    A blogger is someone who writes for

    or keeps a weblog on the Internet inorder to voice opinions. Some of them

    are sharp observers)

    Bret at blackwealthnow.com post-

    ed this comment on the blaqboard:

    Its our fault, after 300 years of

    slavery, sharecropping and moving

    north to get good jobs working 12-

    MODERN DAY SLAVERYcontd from page 5

    14 hour days in hot, sweaty factories,

    that we cant get work today. This is BS.

    The myth of the lazy American needs

    to die and the myth of the lazy Blackfolks needs to die with it too. Some

    good points are made, some truth is told,

    but the overarching thesis of (Milloys)

    article is off base, over-reaching and

    absurd.

    But Miller & Long does have its

    surrogates in the African-American

    community, possibly because they are

    funding them.

    Washington City Papercolumnist

    James Jones, reports in Loose Lipsthat the African-American activist Robert

    Green, operating through a front group,

    Capitol Area Minority Contractors and

    Business Association, (CAMCBA)

    complained that the citys deal on a

    union-friendly baseball-stadium labor

    agreement was anti-minority.

    The columnist pointed out however

    that CAMCBA was an outt run by the

    colorful and sometimes foulmouthed

    advocate Robert Green who oper-ated on a $200,100 bankroll that came

    from two big open-shop companies

    concrete-contracting giant Miller &

    Long and electrical-contracting firm

    MC Dean. The goal of the CAMCBA

    political action committee, according to

    Brett McMahon of Miller & Long, is to

    encourage free enterprise and support

    D.C. politicians who oppose special-

    preference legislation.

    Both companies funding the PACare also associate members of CAM-

    CBA, according to Green, who says his

    organization cant accept money from

    any political organization.

    Associate member is Greens

    code word for contributors who are not

    minorities, the columnist explained.

    SAETY REPORTScontd from front page

    What happened? Where did they

    go? Were they lost, stolen, strayed,

    or were they never reported to begin

    with?

    It is not unreasonable to suspect

    there might be something hinky goingon, (see To Die For, on next page) that

    OSHA has managed never to nd out

    about job-related deaths at Miller &

    Long work sites, at least two of which

    we know about. The Contractors Critic

    is checking for more.

    In any event this is what the safety

    reports that could be discovered through

    OSHA reveal about Miller & Long.

    For instance, in one site inspection

    alone in Towson, Md., 13 violations of

    federal safety law were discovered, eight

    of them serious (#302274006). Five

    violations at another site in Baltimore,Md., produced three of them serious

    (#309437093). Four serious violations

    were found at a site in Virginia Beach,

    Va. (#308564731). And two sites were

    found with two serious violations

    each one site was in Annapolis, Md.

    (#304731003) and the other at Bethesda,

    Md. (#305357022).

    The remaining OSHA violations

    were listed as single violations found. The

    Contractors Critic is following up to nd

    out how serious each of those cases migh

    have been.

    Inspectors characterized many of the68 violations as serious. Some of the

    most egregious violations discovered were

    also cited as repeat offenses.

    Fines imposed for the most serious of

    the multiple-violations reported totaled

    over $70,000 in nes. The largest single

    6 | The ConTraCTors CriTiC march 2008

    safeTy reporTs contd next page

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    7/16

    Miller & Lon are to die orat LeaSt three workerS have dIed at mILLer & Long work SIteS, two

    of theSe deathS were apparentLy never reported to occUpatIonaL

    Safety and heaLth admInIStratIon (oSha), So far aS an extenSIve docU-

    ment Search haS been abLe to determIne.

    Of the 68 reports of safety code

    violations OSHA inspectors found at

    Miller & Long job sites in the last 10

    years only one involved a death, ac-

    cording to OSHA records.

    However, The Contractors Critic

    has been able to ascertain from court

    documents and other public records

    that at least two more people died in

    connection with accidents at Miller

    & Long jobsites, but were apparently

    never reported to OSHA

    That suggests that Miller & Long

    is consistently skirting proper report-

    ing requirements.

    The death of Roberto Ayala Ri-

    vera, 23, of El Salvador was one such

    case. Rivera was killed Dec. 28, 1999

    while working on a Miller & Long

    project in Washington, D.C.

    On behalf of Riveras survivors,

    attorney Robert Short sued Miller

    & Long on Dec. 20, 2000 in District

    of Columbia Superior Court, as case

    #0009137-00. Robert Short v. Miller

    & Long Concrete Construction, Inc.

    To die for contd next page

    IS MILLER & LONg SkIRT-INg PROPER REPORTINgO WORkPLACE DEATHS TOOSHA?

    SAETY REPORTScontd from page 6

    mILLer & Long concrete conStrUctIon, Inc., ISSUe no. 1 |

    ne was for $22,500.

    Among the violations was one

    involving the death of a Miller & Long

    worker who died as the result of a fall

    at a Falls Church, Va. jobsite on July 25,

    2000, OSHA reported.

    Employee #1 was killed about

    10:30 a.m. when he fell while disas-

    sembling a scaffold, striking his head

    on a concrete oor.He was own by helicopter to a local

    hospital where he died the next day from

    his head injuries, OSHA reported.

    Looking at the 10-year record and

    considering the missing half-century of

    safety reports, there are some things we

    can surmise.

    If the same levels of unsafe work

    policies reported in the last decade also

    prevailed in the previous decades that

    went unreported, then The Contractors

    Critic reasonably concludes that there

    could be at least a minimum of 350 safety

    violations that occurred. It would also be

    reasonable to conclude that a substantial

    number of those unreported mishaps were

    serious in nature and that deaths may

    well have occurred in connection with

    some of them.

    This is not good news for Miller

    & Long, or those who hire them, or for

    OSHA, which has made such a to-do abou

    self inspection programs of employers

    which according to OSHA have inspired

    employers to provide safer work places.

    However, based on Miller & Longsmissing years of accident reports it may

    be that OSHA is reducing accidents sim

    ply by allowing employers to not repor

    them.

    Specifically, since Miller & Long

    seemingly doesnt report job deaths now

    why, then, would it do so in the past?

    The Contractors Critic will continue

    to investigate this work safety mystery.

    Miller & Longs 10 year saetyrecord as reported by OSHA

    is chock ull o serious, dan-

    gerous saety violations. For

    specifc totals, pleasesee the

    OSHA chart on page 10.

    IS OSHA PURPOSELYWITHHOLDINg INORMATIONROM THE PUbLIC?

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    8/16

    aluminum beam

    contd next page

    Miller & Long Concrete Con-

    struction has been sued atleast twice

    for injuries suffered after heavyobjects were dropped on people

    who just happened to be passing by

    a Miller & Long worksite.

    For example, according to the

    lawsuit Leonard Douglas v. John

    Doe and/or Miller & Long Con-

    crete Construction. Inc. filed as

    case #97-1080 in Arlington County

    (Virginia) Circuit Court on Nov.

    6, 1997, Douglas was hurt when

    Miller & Long employee John

    Doe dropped a piece of plywood

    onto (Douglas), thereby resulting

    in serious and permanent injury to

    (Douglas).

    Loo, Up in the sy! Its a plywoodsla! No, its an aluminum eam!

    VISCARRA SUSTAINED INjURIES WHEN AN

    ALUMINUM bEAM UNDER THE CONTROL, CUS-

    TODY AND SUPERVISION O MILLER & LONgELL OUR STORIES ONTO HIS VEHICLE.

    It seems Douglas was at the

    Washington National Airport in Ar-

    lington, Va. about 10:45 a.m. Nov.7, 1995 when the plywood piece

    hit him.

    For that he wanted the full and

    just amount of $300,000, pus costs

    and interests.

    Elsewhere, according to docu-

    ments unearthed from civil division

    of the Superior Court of the District

    of Columbia, another unusual event

    involving Miller & Long was visited

    upon Fulton, Md. resident Steve A.

    Viscarra in 1998.

    8 | The ConTraCTors CriTiC march 2008

    TO DIE OR contd from page 7

    describes the accident this way.

    Rivera was working for Miller &

    Long at the job site on M Street near

    the intersection of 5th

    street in thedistricts southeast section about 3:25

    p.m. Dec. 28, 1999.

    And so it was that at that time

    and place aforesaid Douglas D. Nan-

    nah was operating a vehicle west-

    bound on M Street and negligently

    struck and collided with the decedent

    inicting injuries which ultimately

    claimed decedents life.

    For this wrongful death Miller

    & Long bore some blame, the suit

    contends, because Miller & Long had

    undertaken to manage vehicular traf-

    c on M Street around the construc-

    tion zone and had a responsibility to

    adequately manage trafc to avoid

    colliding with workers and to provide

    a reasonably safe worker area to all

    workers, even for foreign workers

    such as the victim, Rivera.

    However, Miller & Long failedto do this and so it exposed the de-

    cedent and other workers to the risk

    of injury by errant vehicles, the suit

    contends.

    Rivera was survived by his moth-

    er, Cruz Ayala, of El Salvador, Central

    America, who was next of kin and

    heir-at-law. Moreover, she was nan-

    cially dependent on Rivera at the time

    of his death.

    The victim was also survived

    by Yakelin E. Ayala, his niece, and

    Conseption Aayala, his sister, of El

    Salvador, Central America, both of

    whom were financially dependent

    upon the decedent at the time of his

    death.

    To die for contd next page

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    9/16

    According to information laid

    out in Steve A. Viscarra v. Miller

    & Long Concrete Construction,

    Inc. led July 20, 2000 as case

    #0005414-00, Viscarra was south-

    bound on 9th Street at or near the

    intersection of H Street in Wash-

    ington, DC, on Dec. 10, 1998

    when literally out of the blue

    an aluminum beam under the

    control, custody and supervision

    of employees or agents of M & L,

    fell four (4) stories and struck

    Viscarras vehicle.

    Apparently, just looking bothways when crossing an intersection

    is not quite enough precaution to

    take whenever Miller & Long is on

    the job. Best look up and down, to,

    if the company is in the vicinity.

    Viscarra demanded $500,000

    for the injuries and damages he

    suffered.

    Miller & Long stipulated to

    that is, admitted the liability,

    but denied Viscarra had sustained

    the extent of the injury and damages

    that he is claiming, Miller & Long

    responded.

    In this additional example of

    what can result when Miller & Long

    employees careen along working

    with reckless abandon (as the

    Washington Postreports) it caused

    Viscarra some $40,000 in suffering,

    medical costs and lost wages, Miller

    & Long asserted in its respondingcourt documents.

    Miller & Long asked that the

    suit be dismissed.

    The Contractors Critic has yet

    to discover any documents indicat-

    ing the nal and ofcial outcome of

    that lawsuit, but is pursuing such.

    ALUMINUM bEAMcontd from page 8

    TO DIE ORcontd from page 8

    His brother, Enrique Ayala, a

    resident of the State of Maryland also

    survived the decedent.

    For this the family sought $5 mil-lion in damages.

    Although the suit was filed in

    late 2000 there were, mysteriously

    enough, no follow up documents

    to be found in the case le. There

    was no answer from Miller & Long.

    No motion for summary judgment.

    Nothing.

    Which raises the question: What

    happened?

    Adding to the mystery is the

    fact that this workplace fatality was

    apparently never reported to federal

    workplace safety and health investiga-

    tors. OSHA les produced no recordsof this fatal accident being reported

    to authorities as required by law and

    process.

    Another wrongful death case aris-

    ing from another Miller & Long job

    goes back to 1997 when the politically

    well-wired rm engaged as one of the

    contractors on a construction project

    in Virginia, documents obtained in

    the matter ofMonenne Y. Welch, Ad-

    ministrator v. Miller & Long Concrete

    mILLer & Long concrete conStrUctIon, Inc., ISSUe no. 1 |

    Construction, Inc., et al; led as a

    Law No. 167623, 19th Judicial Circui

    of Virginia.

    This is one of those rare caseswhere the facts are truly not in dispute

    All parties agree as to what happened

    The following is taken directly from

    Plaintiffs pleadings, the court deci-

    sion states, and goes on to quote from

    the original pleadings:

    On October 8, 1997 the deceased

    Bernie P. Welch, was operating a dump

    truck on behalf of his employer, C.W

    Strittmatter Company, on the job in

    question. Miller and Long owned a

    mobile motor vehicle truck fty (50)

    to crane, and its employee Nathan

    Gunn was operating the boom when

    the whole truck tipped over. The boom

    crushed the cab of Mr. Welchs truck

    crushing him.

    The Strittmatter truck was insured

    Welch was driving it in the course of

    his employment. Moreover, Welch

    also had a personal automobile policywith GEICO which had provisions tha

    covered him at the time, the decision

    stated.

    All parties agree (Miller & Long)

    falls within the jurisdiction of the ap-

    plicable laws.

    Miller & Long argued that Welch

    had other avenues for seeking remedies

    to the death liabilities. GEICO claimed

    immunity.

    The appeals court agreed with the

    lower court judgment rendered by Fair-

    fax County Circuit Court Judge Kathleen

    H. McKay.

    In this case, too, the death went

    unreported to OSHA by either company

    involved and no OSHA inspection of

    Miller & Long and/or Strittmatter Com-

    pany ever took place.

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    10/16

    Miller & Lons dismal 10-year worplace saety totalsMiller & Longs 10-year safety

    record is listed below. The violations

    listed reect initial citations and nes

    proposed by the Federal Occupational

    Safety and Health Administration

    (OSHA). Violation totals may have

    been reduced or bargained down at

    later dates. Investigations of accidents

    may still be open and therefore, viola-

    tions and/or nes were not available

    at the time of publication. The inspec

    tions below may not be a complete lis

    of Miller & Longs OSHA history. Fo

    more information see the OSHA web

    site at: http://www.osha.gov.

    08/28/07

    07/06/07

    02/22/07

    09/26/06

    09/08/06

    01/30/06

    11/04/05

    10/19/05

    08/25/0504/13/05

    01/12/05

    12/14/04

    10/27/04

    10/22/04

    07/01/04

    03/22/04

    10/01/02

    07/15/02

    11/01/01

    10/05/0108/20/01

    02/26/01

    10/16/00

    09/28/00

    09/13/00

    07/25/00

    06/26/00

    06/20/00

    04/05/00

    05/20/99

    03/19/9903/08/99

    10/23/98

    06/17/98

    112665971

    311289219

    310805981

    310318845

    310221510

    309628451

    309437093

    309503779

    309249365308977545

    308564731

    308427012

    307995753

    307995662

    306696162

    307218198

    305571598

    305357022

    304731003

    303857130303856736

    303854541

    303982201

    303258289

    301472924

    303245930

    301471918

    301471777

    301470563

    302274006

    302638689301104311

    302024906

    302024831

    $2,100.00

    $700.00

    $825.00

    $1,350.00

    $0.00

    $0.00

    $4,225.00

    $10,000.00

    $3,500.00$4,500.00

    $3,300.00

    $5,000.00

    $20,000.00

    $1,500.00

    $2,500.00

    $3,150.00

    $3,475.00

    $3,500.00

    $3,062.00

    $22,500.00$2,975.00

    $5,000.00

    $3,400.00

    $2,750.00

    $2,100.00

    $0.00

    $4,000.00

    $2,500.00

    $3,500.00

    $19,036.00

    $1,375.00$975.00

    $500.00

    $12,624.00

    dt ict

    nlct vt f

    MILLER & LONgS 10-YEAR OSHA TALLY:

    3 worplace accidents1

    , 68 saety violations, 73% o which were classifed as seriousor repeat violations o ederal saety law and resulted in over $155,000 in fnes.

    1 t oSha s onLy ilu l is l isis i ls 10 s. f ii u l is s -

    l oSha, ls s s 6-8.

    20 es vi, Ls, pa

    2800 g a., ri, va

    3030 mill Isl p., fi, md

    4301 mili r., wsi dc

    811 4 S., wsi dc

    1430 k S., wsi dc

    4701 wsi bl., bli, md

    2903 eis a., ali, va

    1101 n y a., wsi dc

    2777 S. csl d., ali, va

    34 S & ali a., viii b, va

    1512 14 S., wsi dc

    2400 m S., wsi dc

    1400 cu S., wsi dc

    809 6 S., wsi dc

    4600 tii r., rli, nc

    210 S. pul S., bli, md

    7791 wissi a., bs, md

    7045 b b r., alis, md

    1001 wissi a., wsi dc1150 vu S., wsi dc

    900 15 S., wsi dc

    2600 t os bl., rill, md

    3100 S d., viii b, va

    820 fis S., wsi dc

    5275 Lsu pi, flls cu va

    80 m S., wsi dc

    2600 psli a., wsi dc

    300 m S., wsi dc

    8201 Lsll r., ts, md

    2 ti d., du, nc4411 ciu a., wsi dc

    clui mll, n pi g, clui, md

    10300 Lil pu p., clui, md

    1 sius

    1 sius

    1 sius

    1 sius

    2

    3

    3 sius, 2

    1

    1 sius1 sius

    4 sius

    1 sius

    1

    1 sius

    1 sius, 1

    1 sius

    ACCIDENT, 1 sius

    2 sius

    ACCIDENT, 2 sius, 1

    1 sius, 1 1 sius

    1 sius

    1 sius

    1 sius

    1 sius, 1

    ACCIDENT

    1 unclassifed

    1

    1 sius

    8 sius, 5

    1 sius1 sius

    1

    6 sius, 2

    10 | The ConTraCTors CriTiC march 2008

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    11/16

    A Virginia woman sued Miller &

    Long and one of its employees after an

    Aug. 18, 2006 vehicular crash on a con-

    necting ramp from Route 1 to I-395.

    The injuries she suffered led her

    to sue Miller & Long for $250,000,

    according toRobin R. Hayes v. Miller& Long Inc. and Samuel Wesley Smith,

    filed as case #07-296 in Arlington

    County (Virginia) Circuit Court on

    March 5, 2007.

    Hayes alleged that at around 6 p.m.

    that evening she was northbound in

    the left lane of the entrance ramp from

    Route 1 onto I-395 and collided with a

    tractor-trailer driven by Smith.

    Smith was operating a vehicle

    owned by defendant Miller & Long in

    the same direction and place as (Hayes)

    when he failed to slow down to avoid

    a collision, and rear-ended (Hayes),

    pushing her vehicle to the Jersey wall

    on the opposite side of the highway.

    A Jersey wall, also known as a

    Jersey barrier, is the workplace nick-

    name of a barricade that separates

    lanes of trafc often opposing lanes

    of trafc in order to minimize vehicle

    crossover in the event of accidents.

    As a result, Hayes was caused to

    sustain serious and permanent injuries

    and which thereafter prevented her

    from transacting her business. More-

    over, the suit states, the victim will

    continue to suffer great pain of body

    and mind as a result of the permanent

    disability, deformity, loss of earnings

    and earning capacities as a result of

    the collision.

    Hayes was transported by am-

    bulance to a hospital where doctors

    treated her for injuries including, an

    exacerbation of lumbar disc degenera-

    tion and myofascial pain secondary to

    the crash of 8/16/06 with trigger points

    in the buttocks.

    In other words, Smith rear-end-

    ing her with the Miller & Long trac-

    tor-trailer he was carelessly driving

    proving to be a pain in the butt for the

    unfortunate Hayes.

    For those and other injuries Hayes

    asked the court to award her $250,000,

    plus any and all legal and court costs,

    the suit states.Miller & Long replied to Hayess

    suit March 22, 2007 by asserting it

    was without sufcient knowledge or

    Other accident claims aainst M&L

    $250k lawsuit stems rom Miller & Lon driver accident

    mILLer & Long concrete conStrUctIon, Inc., ISSUe no. 1 | 1

    gags was that, no matter what mischie

    Hogan and his heroes might be involve

    in, Sergeant Schultz would assure Colo

    nel Klink that, I see nussing. I know

    nussing.

    Miller & Long also informed th

    court that it intended to raise any andall defenses which become available

    up to the time of the trial.

    Among other things Miller & Long

    contended that Hayes was barred from

    any recovery in this case under the doc

    trine of assumption of risk.

    In lawyer lingo Miller & Long

    mouthpiece was thereby contending tha

    simply by getting into her vehicle and

    operating it on a public highway that day

    Hayes automatically put her self at riskand therefore consequently at least partly

    guilty of harming herself.

    Why, if she and her vehicle hadn

    been where they were at the time of th

    accident then Miller & Longs drive

    and vehicle couldnt possibly have hi

    her, right?

    Medical expert witnesses were to b

    called by both parties, other document

    led in the case showed.

    Employees of Miller & Long, Inc.

    have been involved in other vehicular

    accidents during the course of their

    work.

    In 2004 Olga Teutler through or

    under Allstate Insurance Company

    sued Miller & Long and Thomas Mayin connection with a vehicular accident

    in Springeld, Va.

    In Olga Teutler v. Miller & Long

    Conrete Construction, Inc., Thomas

    May, led in the Montgomery County

    (Maryland) District Court as case

    #10670-2004 on May 5, 2005, Teutler

    alleged that on Feb. 25, 2004 her vehicle

    operated at the time by one Alexander

    Teutler on Carleigh Parkway was struck

    at the intersection of Old Keen Mill Road

    in Springeld, Virginia by a Miller &

    Long vehicle driven by May.

    May allegedly drove through ared light at the intersection, colliding

    with Teutlers vehicle, according to

    the suit, which sought $2,657.83 in

    damages.

    The case was dismissed appar-

    ently upon settlement on June 23,

    2004, court documents showed.

    MILLER & LONg ARgUED THAT

    HAYES PUT HERSEL AT RISk

    bY OPERATINg HER VEHICLE

    ON A PUbLIC HIgHWAY, AND

    THUS SHOULD bE bARREDROM ANY RECOVERY.

    information to admit the allegations

    in Hayess complaint. This is known

    colloquially as the Sergeant Schultz

    Defense.

    The term derives from the Ho-

    gans Heroes television series char-

    acter in which one of the running

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    12/16

    12 | The ConTraCTors CriTiC march 2008

    f

    t C n C Tt Ct

    01/23/08

    07/16/07

    05/23/07

    05/04/07

    02/26/07

    02/12/07

    11/24/06

    07/20/06

    06/16/06

    04/14/06

    04/14/06

    03/08/06

    02/14/06

    12/20/05

    09/02/05

    06/20/05

    06/13/05

    06/01/05

    04/19/05

    12/22/04

    11/12/04

    11/05/04

    10/15/04

    10/01/04

    05/13/04

    05/13/04

    05/13/04

    05/04/04

    04/22/04

    04/06/04

    12/31/03

    12/30/03

    10/22/03

    09/29/03

    09/24/03

    08/15/03

    08/06/03

    07/11/03

    07/08/03

    Extraordinary numer o lawsuits land Miller & Lon in courtThe listing below is only a partial record of litigation involving Miller & Long Concrete Construction.

    As of publication, LASERs research has turned up at least 87 additional lawsuits in which Miller & Long is named as a party of interest.

    2008 ca 000510 d

    2007 ca 004890 2

    10100170132007

    2007 ca 003110 b

    60200042322007

    13c07068187

    2006 Sc1 013208

    60100145322006

    2006 ca 004679 b

    2006 ca 002945 b

    2006 ca 002946 b

    2006 Sc3 002554

    50200049062006

    100200033502005

    60100181712005

    60200118592005

    100200014502005

    50200170772005

    60100079782005

    2004 Sc3 015491

    50200399592004

    60200254642004

    0601Sp027252004

    2004 ca 007526 b

    2004 Scb 006439

    2004 Scb 006440

    2004 Scb 006441

    60200106702004

    50200148702004

    80400126052004

    248494v

    60200283172003

    06c03039626

    60200212152003

    246159v

    50200282402003

    50200271592003

    40200025442003

    100200017682003

    Prospect Waterproong v. Miller & Long

    Glen Construction Company, Inc. v. Miller & Long

    Fia Card Services Bank v. Neale, Christopher

    Yates, James v. Miller & Long

    Pasadena Receivables, Inc. v. Gavida, Jose

    Moore v. Miller & Long, et al

    Revels, Ray L v. Miller & Long

    Discover Bank v. Garrido, Victor

    Goss, Mitchell F. v. Miller & Long

    A & A Window & Glass, Inc.. v. Glen Construction Co., Inc., Miller & Long

    Brown, David v. 301 Massachusetts Avenue, Inc., Miller & Long

    Jantio, Roger B. v. Washington Automotive Co.

    Grady MNGT, Inc. v. Montanez, Heriberto

    University of MD Medical v. Bowers, Jack Leroy

    Inova Alexandria Hospital v. Smith, Lee

    Toyota Motor Credit Corp. v. Douglas, Martel

    Green Tree Servicing LLC. v. Favorite, Larry R.

    Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Velaszues, James

    Great Seneca Financial Corp. v. Guerrero, Jose

    Aparicio, Jose L v. Miller & Long

    Great Seneca Financial Corp v. Rogers, Eliott K

    RAVI PASSI, M.D. v. Bravo, Stephen

    Santos, Maria v. Santos, Pablo

    Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Kadcon Corp.

    Argueta, Douglas v. Cantrell, Wesley

    Argueta, Ceceila v. Cantrell, Wesley John

    Argueta, Ceceila v. Cantrell, Wesley John

    Olga Teutler, ALLSTATE v. Miller & Long

    Mid Atlantic Finance Corp. v. Brown, Ronald Willis

    Palisides Collection LLC v. Wheatley

    Miller & Long v. Cruz, Pedro

    Laurito, Eduardo v. Miller & Long

    In The Matter of: Jason L Ruby v. Miller & Long

    Platinum Financial Services Corp. v. Ramirez, Rudy

    Miller & Long Company Inc v. Ruby, Jason L.

    Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Bragg, John

    Sage Financial v. Huff, David

    Capital One Bank v. Bates, Duane

    CITIFinancial FKA Commerical Credit v. Haugh, Gary Sr.

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    bli ci disi cu, md

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    h cu ciui cu, md

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    rill disi cu, md

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    U ml disi cu, md

    cll cu disi cu, md

    rill disi cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    cll cu disi cu, md

    U ml disi cu, md

    rill disi cu, md

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    U ml disi cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    rill disi cu, md

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    U ml disi cu, md

    ts disi cu, md

    m cu ciui cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    cll cu ciui cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    m cu ciui cu, md

    U ml disi cu, md

    U ml disi cu, md

    cls cu disi cu, md

    cll cu disi cu, md

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    13/16

    mILLer & Long concrete conStrUctIon, Inc., ISSUe no. 1 | 1

    f

    t C n C Tt Ct

    07/02/03

    06/10/03

    05/01/03

    02/27/03

    02/11/03

    02/11/03

    11/20/02

    11/20/02

    10/09/02

    09/13/02

    09/06/02

    07/23/02

    07/15/02

    06/21/02

    06/07/02

    04/26/02

    11/16/01

    09/27/01

    09/26/01

    08/16/01

    07/19/01

    07/06/01

    07/05/01

    05/16/01

    04/25/01

    04/03/01

    03/29/01

    02/06/01

    02/06/01

    01/25/01

    01/25/01

    12/08/00

    11/02/00

    09/07/00

    08/08/0007/20/00

    07/19/00

    06/01/00

    05/24/00

    04/04/00

    03/31/00

    03/29/00

    03/24/00

    50200219582003

    60200126142003

    2003 ca 003553 b

    60200044522003

    50200044412003

    50200044452003

    60100256282002

    60100256312002

    110100045382002

    40100017982002

    60200187732002

    70200091992002

    60200151772002

    50200204992002

    2002 ca 004542 b

    60100093542002

    60200248142001

    60200218132001

    60100219142001

    60100181662001

    18489fL

    40100008692001

    50200210182001

    100100022132001

    220876v

    60200080282001

    50200105292001

    60200022652001

    60200022652001

    60200015382001

    60200015382001

    2000 ca 009137 b

    40300017232000

    1975 00 4

    50200255822000

    2000 ca 005415 b

    50200237292000

    2000 ca 004213 b

    40200015992000

    50200101942000

    50200103872000

    40300005182000

    60200076392000

    May Department Stores v. Jones, Herbert

    Toyota Motor Credit Corp. v. TURCIOS, GRETA J

    Twyman, Dorian v. Miller & Long Co.

    Toyota Mortor Credit Co. v. Sanchez, Jesus Orlando

    Platinum Financial Services Corp. Corp. v. Huff, David

    Platinum Financial Services Corp. Corp. v. Carter, Charles

    Alan Corneld, DC v. Gavidia, Jose

    Coneld, Alan D.C. v. Gavida

    Thurmont Cooperative Inc. v. Favorite, Larry R.

    Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Monzon, Efrain

    Montgomery General Hospital v. Fultz, Larry

    Rose Shanis Financial Services, Llc. v. Wines, Ortho

    Loudoun Hospital Center v. Mcinnis, Carel R.

    Capital One Bank v. Thomas, Willie

    Gonzalez, Oscar A. v. The Donohoe Companies Inc.

    Seneca Physical Therapy v. Vaughn, Andrew

    Platinum Financial Services Corp. v. Gonzalez, Daysi

    Warren Memorial Hospital Inc v. Roberts, James G Sr.

    Alan D. Corneld, D.C. v. Matamoros, Maria

    Coneld, Alan D.C. v. Flores, Fernando

    Torres, Alva v. Torres, George L and Miller & Long

    Chrysler Financial Company Llc v. Cheverton, George H.

    Chrysler Financial Co. LLC v. Bonilla, Fabio Guerra

    Pasadena Receivables, Inc. v. Denson, Olivia

    Gomez, Jose Carlos v. Miller & Long

    Holy Cross Hospital v. Parada, Oscar

    Platinum Financial Services Corp. v. Brown, Charles

    Southern Management Corp. v. Baker, Jesse

    Southern Mngt. Corp v. Baker, Jessie

    Platinum Financial Services Corp. v. Sosa, Jose

    Platinum Financial Services Corp. v. Sosa, Jose

    RA Rivera, Robert v. Miller & Long

    Musically Yours v. Thompson, Robery

    Miller & Long, et al v. Constantiny, Roger

    Green, Presidential v. Freman, Joe

    Viscara, Steve A v. Miller & Long

    Realty Mngt. Serv Inc. v. Thomas, Clifton

    Berrios, Enez v. Steele Foundations, Inc., Miller & Long, et al

    State of Maryland, DLLR v. Hensly, Kenneth

    Rose Shanis Financial Services LLC v. Umansor, Florentin

    State of Maryland, DLLR v. Robinson, Oneill

    St. Marys Hospital MD v. Smith, Dwight

    May Department Stores v. Lomeli, Jose

    U ml disi cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    U ml disi cu, md

    U ml disi cu, md

    rill disi cu, md

    rill disi cu, md

    fi cu disi cu, md

    cl cu disi cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    gl bui disi cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    U ml disi cu, md

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    rill disi cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    rill disi cu, md

    rill disi cu, md

    m cu ciui cu, md

    cl cu disi cu, md

    U ml disi cu, md

    h cu disi cu, md

    m cu ciui cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    U ml disi cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    Si ms cu disi cu, md

    cu als viii, va

    U ml disi cu, mddisi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    U ml disi cu, md

    disi clui Sui-ciil, dc

    cls cu disi cu, md

    U ml disi cu, md

    U ml disi cu, md

    Si ms cu disi cu, md

    Sil Si disi cu, md

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    14/16

    EDITORIAL

    Miller & Lon: A company without a countryLASER has been investigating and

    publishing information about unscrupu-

    lous, irresponsible and unprofessional

    contractors for almost 15 years. I have

    been personally involved in the construc-

    tion industry for over 35 years and in all

    that time, neither LASER or I ever have

    come close to nding such a morally

    corrupt and unscrupulous contracting

    company as Miller & Long Concrete Con-

    struction and its various identities. With

    this being said, I will attempt to explain

    why Miller & Long, which happens to

    be the largest concrete contractor in the

    country, is in reality, cmpy wtht

    ctry.

    On behalf of LASER and myself, I

    want to make it perfectly clear that legal

    immigrants are not at issue in this publica-

    tion and that illegal employees of Miller &

    Long are victims who have been and are

    being exploited. They are being exploited

    not only for the nancial benet of Miller

    & Long, but also for a much more sinister

    reason. The company is using its illegal

    employees precarious status to drive

    down the employment opportunities of

    American citizens who, in many cases,

    live within eyesight of Miller & Long

    construction projects. They exalt their

    enslaved illegal work force in an effort to

    demean and undermine the self-esteem of

    the African American workforce that, by

    Miller & Longs own admittance, made

    up a large part of their employees until

    the early 1980s. They would have us

    believe that African American citizens

    inexplicably became less productive, less

    family orientated and less skilled since the

    1980s. When we visit the homes of our

    employees, we nd that Latino workers

    have much more family support, more

    intact families, than African American

    workers said Myles Gladstone, vice

    president for human resources at Miller

    & Long. When it comes to African

    American workers, retention is a huge

    problem, and part of the reason is a lack

    of support.

    Of course it is a coincidence that

    Mr. Gladstone, in 1981, was a Spanish

    teacher who became a translator for Miller

    & Long because, according to company

    president Nicholas G. Paleologos, We

    could see the way our industry was

    headed or to be more explicit, the way

    Miller & Long was headed in the indus-

    try. It is glaringly obvious that Miller &

    AMERICAN CITIzENS HAVE AbIRTHRIgHT TO bE OEREDjObS IN AMERICA THAT PAYA LIVINg WAgE, HAVE SAEWORkINg CONDITIONS, AREPROTECTED ROM DISCRIMINA-

    TION AND MOST IMPORTANTLY,HAVE ALL THE PROTECTIONS OTHE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

    ediTorial contd next page

    14 | The ConTraCTors CriTiC march 2008

    Long prefers desperate illegal work

    ers from El Salvador, who will work

    unquestioningly. Is it any wonde

    that a Washington Postreporter woul

    report, a vanload of Latinos pulls up

    to a jobsite. Only one speaks Englis

    and serves as a translator. They woras a team with near reckless abandon

    hardly stopping for lunch. Before long

    they are earning overtime pay. A

    problem with this observation is wha

    if Miller & Long doesnt pay overtim

    to its illegal workforce? What will th

    workers do? Call the Immigratio

    I HAVE bEEN PERSONALLY INVOLVED IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY

    OR OVER 35 YEARS AND IN ALL THAT TIME, NEITHER LASER OR I

    EVER HAVE COME CLOSE TO INDINg SUCH A MORALLY CORRUPT

    AND UNSCRUPULOUS CONTRACTINg COMPANY AS MILLER & LONg

    CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION AND ITS VARIOUS IDENTITIES.

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    15/16

    and Naturalization Service if they are not

    paid?

    Miller & Long, Mr. Gladstone and

    their surrogates, in an unconscionable useof the so called free press and highly paid

    lobbyists, are erroneously promoting the

    debunked myth that African American

    workers are lazy, undependable, illiterate

    and not worth hiring in their own neigh-

    borhoods. Of course the fact that Miller

    & Longs human resource director has to

    speak Spanish and almost every Miller &

    Long crew has to have a Spanish interpreter

    to direct the workers, who obviously dont

    speak, read or write English, is of no con-cern to the company. Simply put, speaking

    English on a dangerous construction site is

    a matter of safety, which may explain the

    deaths, accidents and injuries on Miller &

    Long job sites.

    The truth about Miller & Long is, they

    will say or do anything and everything to

    get and keep a cheap subservient workforce

    without any regard for American citizens,

    and/or the cost in the further suppression of

    the economically depressed, highly unem-ployed English speaking African American

    communities where most Miller & Long

    job sites are located. Mr. Gladstone un-

    abashedly brags about all its humanitar-

    ian aid trips to El Salvador which in

    LASERs opinion is a guise for recruiting

    more subservient illegal labor while at

    the same time, in the same articles, derides

    the same African American families that

    enabled Miller & Long to build and stay

    in business for their rst 35 years.What is surprising is that many con-

    struction management rms, developers

    and businesses turn a blind eye to the

    despicable actions of Miller & Longs

    voluminous safety problems, litigation

    and illegal work force. Wouldnt many

    employers like to have a cheap, subservient

    work force that, for all intents and purpos-

    es, has no legal rights? Unfortunately,

    the answer to this question is yes, but

    LASER and I believe that most Ameri-

    can businesses will repudiate Miller &Longs inherently immoral and illegal

    business model.

    The strangest part of this sordid

    affair is that they have been acting in

    this manner right under the noses, if not

    with the blessings of the President of the

    United States, the U.S. Congress and the

    their families and migrate to the U.S

    The company does damage to honest

    responsible competitors who employ

    American citizens less and less in theconcrete industry because of Miller &

    Longs ability to operate illegally and

    with impunity, within view of the White

    House and Congress.

    LASER and I both believe tha

    American citizens and legal immigrants

    have a birthright to be offered jobs in

    SPEAkINg ENgLISH ON A DANgEROUS

    CONSTRUCTION SITE IS A MATTER O SAETYentire political establishment. That is

    not to mention the jobs Miller & Long

    did with their illegal workforce for the

    U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, Justice

    Training Center, the U.S. Department

    of Transportation, the U.S. Food and

    Drug Administration, and ironically,

    the IRS Headquarters, the Pentagon

    Athletic Center, the Pentagon FederalCredit Union, the E. Barret Prettyman

    Courthouse, the United States Patent

    and Trademark Ofce, the United States

    Mint Headquarters and the United

    States Supreme Court Building, just to

    name a few brazen examples of Miller

    & Longs unwittingly or purposely

    blind government accomplices.

    This would be a ludicrous situation

    if it werent for the serious damages that

    Miller & Long has done and continuesto do to the African American workers

    and the communities that helped make

    Miller & Long the largest concrete

    contractor in the country. Miller and

    Long does damage to some of the

    highest unemployed African Ameri-

    can communities in our country when

    they entice illegal immigrants to leave

    America that pay a living wage, have

    safe working conditions, are protected

    from discrimination, and most impor-

    tantly, have all the protections of the

    United States Constitution.

    Illegal immigrants are not the prob

    lem in America. The problem is compa

    nies such as Miller & Long that have no

    afnity to their country, community andfellow citizens. Miller & Long under-

    mines all aspects of a fair marketplace

    and in doing this; thumb their noses at

    the United States of America, while

    simultaneously exploiting the hopes

    and dreams of poor desperate illega

    immigrants.

    LASER will be doing its best to

    ensure that all responsible businesses

    and elected ofcials are made aware of

    this cancerous growth in the constructionindustry that Miller & Long is spread-

    ing. Who can question the fact tha

    Miller & Long is cmpy wtht

    ctry?

    _____________________________

    J l. W

    psi LaSer, I.

    ei The Contractors Critic

    EDITORIALcontd from page 14

    mILLer & Long concrete conStrUctIon, Inc., ISSUe no. 1 | 1

  • 8/3/2019 Miller and Long Expose

    16/16

    Corporate Inormation

    Source Notes

    LegaL and Safety empLoyer reSearch

    654 Ktck stt, g, C 95948 ph. 530-846-6352

    laser, inc.

    The information contained in Th Ctrctrs Crtc does not reect a complete history of the business practices of Miller & Long Concrete Construction,

    Inc. and/or its related companies. LASER is publishing information that contractors do not and

    will not publish about themselves. LASER has relied on the public record to present this information to the public in an effort

    to promote safety, productivity, honesty, and environmental compliance in the construction industry.

    Miller & Long Concrete Construction, Inc. has been given the opportunity to review this material for errors and inaccuracies.

    As of publication, Miller & Long Concrete Construction, Inc. has not made any specic suggestions or refuted any

    of the specic information in this publication.

    LASER, Inc. will continue to seek and publish additional data.

    For more information, please contact James Wilson at (530) 846-6352 or online at [email protected]

    For past issues ofTh Ctrctrs Crtc on this company and others, please visit LASERs website at www.laser-inc.com

    LiTigaTion:Rb Hys v. Mllr & L C., ic. Case #07-296; led 5-7-07. Circuit Court Arlington County, VA.ol Ttlr v. Mllr & L C. Case #10670-2004; led 6-8-04. District Court of MD, Montgomery County.Rbrt ayl Rvr v. Mllr & L C., ic. Case #0009137-00; led 12-20-00. Superior Court of District of Columbia.Stv a. Vscrr v. Mllr & L Ccrt Cstrct, ic. Case #0005414-00; led 7-20-00; Superior Court of the DC.M Y. Wlch v. Mllr d L Cmpy. Case #98-2534; led 11-5-99. Circuit Court of Fairfax Count, VA.Lrd Dls v. Jh D d/r Mllr & L Ccrt Cstrct, ic. Case #97-1080; led 11-6-97; Arlington

    County Circuit Court, VA.

    oSHa:Obtained through Occupational Safety and Health Administration website (osha.gov) and Freedom of Information Act requests through the U.S.

    Department of Labor.

    aRTiCLeS:Wrck Lds arrst f 15 illls. 1492, blog. 5-23-06. http://1492columbus.glogspot.comTh emplyr Std Bhd Hs Wrkrs. Rachel Swarns. 5-15-06. The New York Times.e dfs d mrts slvdrs. Rachel L. Swarns. El Diario de Hoy en El Salvador. 4-23-2006. http://www.elsalva-dor.com/noticias/2006/04/23/internacionales/int5.asp3 Prspctvs immrt, Frm th isd. New York Times. 4-16-06. http://www.nytimes.comWrk ethc, nt Lts, is Jb Brrr. Courtland Milloy. Washington Post. 4-12-06.Hlp Wtd s immrt Fcs ovrhl. S. Mitra Kalita and Krissah Williams. 3-27-06. Washington Post.

    PaCMan. James Jones. 2-10-06. Loose Lips. Washington City Paper. http.www.washingtoncitypaper.comopprtty Kcks Hrd t Jl Jb Fr. Courtland Milloy. Washington Post.11-30-05. http://www.washingtonpost.comWrk Z; Fr Kth glv, Mk Lf aftr Prs s 24/7 Jb. Neely Tucker. 7-10-05. Washington Post.

    MiSCeLLaneouS:Wrk ethc, nt Lts, is Jb Brrr. BlacBoard.com blog about article.Lbby Rprt. Secretary of State. Akerman Sentertt. 2-13-07, 3-25-05.

    miller & long ConCreTe ConsTruCTion / miller & long Co., inC.4824 ru a.bs, md 20814p: (301) 657-8000://.illl./

    J m. mm, cinils g. plls, psih willis, eui vi psit fizl, S / cll