Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Darlington Local Plan Making and Growing Places DPD SA Scoping Report Appendices, October 2012
Darlington Local Plan
Making and Growing Places Development Plan Document
Appendices to Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report
October 2012
Darlington Borough Council
Darlington Local Plan – Making and Growing Places DPD SA Scoping Report Appendices, October 2012
Introduction to the Appendices
This is the companion document to the Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report of Darlington Borough Council’s Local Plan Making and Growing Places DPD.
Table of Contents
Appendix Title Page A List of Plans, Policies, Programmes and Sustainability 3
Objectives
B Sustainability Baseline 26
C Development of the Sustainability Framework 83
2
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
APPENDIX
ALIST
OF
PLANS, POLICIES, PROGRAMMES
AND
SUSTAINABILITY
OBJECTIVES
SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT
International/
European
National
Regional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
World
Summit
on
Sustainable
Development,
Johannesburg
(2002) (I1)
Global
governmental
declarations
to:
•
Advance
and
strengthen
3
pillars
of
sustainability
(economic
development,
social
development
and
environmenta
l protection)
at all levels
•
Protect
biodiversity
•
Tackle
underdevelop
ment through
education,
training
and
technology
transfer
•
Tackle
global
poverty
•
Change
consumption
and
production
patterns
•
Conserve
natural
resources
•
Tackle
clim
ate
change, and
•
Bring
health
care
to
basic
minimum
standards
A Sustainable
Europe
for a
Better World: A
European
Union
Strategy
for
Sustainable
Development
(2001) (E1)
• The
strategy
identifies
the
Securing
the
Future: UK
Government
Sustainable
Development Strategy
(2005) (N1)
Identifies
four UK
priorities
for action
which
include:
• Sustainable
consumption
and
production
• Clim
ate
change
and
energy
• Natural resource
protection
and
environmental enhancement
• Creating
sustainable
communities
and
a
fairer world
The
strategy
also
sets
out five
guiding
principles
that will
be
used
to achieve
sustainable
development in
the
UK. T
hese
are
as
follows:
• Living
within
environmental limits
• Ensuring
a strong
healthy
just society
• Achieving
a sustainable
economy
• Promoting
good
governance
• Using
sound
science
responsibly
Planning
Act (2008) (N2)
• Reform
s the
planning
system, notably
through
introduction
of National P
olicy
Statements
for infrastructure
and
an
Infrastructure
Planning
Commission
to
process
applications
for nationally
significant infrastructure
projects
at the
national level.
• Introduces
the
Community
Infrastructure
Levy
and
widerranging
Local
Development O
rders.
• Introduces
new
duties
for the
LDF:
Development plan
documents
produced
by
local planning
authorities
must
include
policies
designed
to contribute
to
the
mitigation
of,
and
adaptation
to
clim
ate
change. A
lso, the
sustainable
development duty
in the
Planning
&
Compulsory
Purchase
Act 2004
now
includes
a specific
reference
to the
desirability
of achieving
good
design.
• Gives
LPAs
powers
to
make
small
changes
to
an
existing
planning
perm
ission
on
the
basis
of a
more
lim
ited
application
procedure.
The
Localism
Bill
(2010) proposes
changes
to
the
Planning
Act,
specifically
bringing
the
regime
for national
infrastructure
under the
control of the
Secretary
of S
tate, P
arliament and
PINS.
National Planning
Policy
Framework
The
NPPF
sets
out the
Governments
planning
policies
for England
and
how
Integrated
Regional Framework
for the
North
East ( SUSTAINE
2008) (R1a)
The
IRF
sets
out a
vision
for the
North
East to
be
a place
where
present and
future
generations
have
a high
quality
of life. In
attaining
this
vision, the
North
East
needs
to
be
a vibrant,
self
reliant,
ambitious
and
outward
looking
region
featuring
a dynamic
economy, a
healthy
environment,
and
a distinctive
culture. A
series
of
ten
regional objectives
have
been
developed
that support
the
vision. T
hese
include:
• strengthening
the
economy;
• adapting
to
and
mitigating
against clim
ate
change;
• living
within
environmental limits;
• developing
a m
ore
sustainable
employment m
arket;
• establishing
a strong
learning
and
skills
base;
• improving
health
and
wellbeing
and
reducing
health
inequalities;
• protecting
and
enhancing
the
environment;
• building
sustainable
communities;
• developing
sustainable
transport; and
• promoting
and
respecting
the
region's
culture
and
heritage.
The
North
East of England
Regional Spatial Strategy
to
2021
(R2a)
Policy
2 sates
that LDF’s
should
support
sustainable
development and
construction
through
the
delivery
of twenty
three
environmental,
social and
economic
objectives. T
hese
objectives
have
incorporated
the
ten
regional objectives
of the
IRF.
Sustainable
Communities
in the
North
East:
Building
for the
Future
(2003) (R3)
Implements
the
national sustainable
communities’ action
plan
at the
regional level.
Highlights
actions
to address
housing, planning
and
neighbourhood
renewal
issues
and
further outlines
the
need
to
create
sustainable
communities
which:
• are
economically
prosperous;
• have
decent homes
at a
price
people
can
afford;
• safeguard
the
countryside;
• enjoy
a welldesigned, accessible
and
pleasant living
and
working
environment;
• are
effectively
and
fairly
governed
with
a strong
sense
of community
Durham
County
LPA
Borders
Darlington
Borough
to
the
west and
north.
The
Settlement Hierarchy, as
identified
in County
Durham’s
Core
Strategy
Issues
and
Options
report, includes
three
‘main
towns’ in
close
proximity
to Darlington
Borough
(Newton
Aycliffe, S
hildon
and
Bishop
Auckland).
The
preferred
options
edition
of the
Durham
Plan
identifies
significant employment sites
on
the
border of Darlington
Borough, to
the
south
and
west of A
ycliffe
Industrial E
state, and
a significant housing
site
to the
east of N
ewton
Aycliffe.
Stockton
Borough
LPA
Borders
Darlington
Borough
to
the
east.
Stockton’s
adopted
Core
Strategy
includes
a policy
for the
protection
and
enhancement of the
openness
and
amenity
value
of a
strategic
gap
between
Eaglescliffe
and
Middleton
St George. T
he
preferred
options
stage
of S
tockton’s
Regeneration
and
Environment D
PD
identifies
significant housing
sites
at Urlay
Nook
west of
Egglescliffe, and
along
the
western
edge
of S
tockton, and
a significant employment site
to
the
SE
of the
airport.
Richmondshire
District LPA
Borders
Darlington
Borough
to
the
south.
The
Preferred
Options
Core
Strategy
identifies
the
northern
part
of the
District as
an
area
of development restraint w
ith
the
express
purposes
(among
others) of
resisting
pressures
for development and
commuting
arising
from
Darlington, and
helping
Darlington’s
regeneration. This
is in
conform
ity
with
the
Regional S
patial
Strategy
for Yorkshire
and
the
Humber.
Hambleton
District LPA
Darlington
Borough
has
a short
border with
a rural part
of H
ambleton
District.
The
adopted
Core
Strategy
identifies
the
northern
area, including
the
part
of the
district close
to Darlington, as
an
Area
of Restraint.
Durham
SA
objectives
To
provide
everybody with
the
opportunity to
live
in a
decent and
affordable
home
To
promote
strong, secure
communities
To
improve
education, training
and
lifelong
Sustainable
Community
Strategy
One
Darlington:
Perfectly
Placed
(2008
2021) (L1a)
The
vision
of
Darlington’s
Sustainable
Community
Strategy
(SCS) is
‘One
Darlington, P
erfectly
Placed’ w
hich
can
be
described
as:
• One
Darlington
–
Refers
to
making
the
most of D
arlington’s
unique
character and
qualities
and
to
building
inclusion
and
opportunity
for all.
A
need
has
been
identified
for gap
narrowing
in relation
to
educational
attainment,
health, life
expectancy
and
access
to
jobs,
services
and
facilities.
• Perfectly
Placed
–
The
Perfect P
lace
in
2021
will
have
a
strong
sense
of
community
and
improved
quality
of
life
for all Darlington
people, including
future
generations,
whilst respecting
local
and
global
environmental limits.
A number of long
term
outcomes
have
been
identified
in the
strategy,
for example:
• To
increase
employment,
pay
levels
and
economic
prospects
for people
living
in the
most
deprived
neighbourhoods
• Increase
participation
rates
in post 16
education
• Maximise
people’s
Policies, designations
and
allocations
to
protect
biodiversity, heritage
and
landscape, conserve
natural
resources
and
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
Policies, designations
and
allocations
to
promote
urban
and
rural regeneration
and
contribute
to addressing
inequalities
in health,
employment and
education.
Location
of new
development
and
allocations
to
be
easily
accessible, promote
safety
and
contribute
to
strengthening
existing
communities
Need
to
consult the
local
community
and
stakeholders
regarding
policies,
designations
and
allocations
Must include
(when
taken
together with
other DPDs)
policies
designed
to
contribute
to
the
mitigation
of,
and
adaptation
to, clim
ate
change
Must be
prepared
with
particular regard
to
the
desirability
of achieving
good
design.
Take
account of urban
fringe
effects
arising
from
the
proximity
of N
ewton
Aycliffe.
Shildon
and
to a
lesser extent
Bishop
Auckland.
Consider potential for green
infrastructure
in the
Bishopton
area
Encourage
existing
and
new
employment sites
accessible
to
deprived
neighbourhoods.
Take
account of new
employment sites
potentially
to
be
allocated
within
the
gaps
between
Darlington
and
Newton
Aycliffe, and
Middleton
St G
eorge
and
Yarm
.
The
requirements
of
the
SEA
must be
met
and
documented
through
the
SA
process.
Appraisal of policies,
designations
and
location
of new
development and
allocations
to
consider
social,
economic
and
environmental effects
against Darlington’s
key
issues
Ensure
a design
criterion
is applied
to
all options
and
policies
Include
proximity
to
deprived
neighbourhoods
as
a
criterion
for
employment sites
Assess
crossborder
impacts
of policies
covering
the
whole
borough
and
those
covering
sites
near the
border.
Increased
importance
of the
remaining
countryside
gaps
between
Darlington,
Middleton
St G
eorge
and
adjacent towns.
Need
for improved
sustainable
travel
connections
with
adjacent towns
and
employment areas.
3
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT
International/
European
National
Regional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
following
unsustainabl
e trends
on
which
action
needs
to
be
taken:
• Clim
ate
change
and
energy
use
• Production
and
consumption
rates
• Natural
resource
use
• Public
health,
poverty
and
social
exclusion
• Economic
and
social
implications
of an
ageing
society
• Global
commitment
to sustainable
development
Strategic
Environmental
Assessment
Directive
(2001/42/EC) (E2)
Objective
to:
Provide
for a
high
level of protection
of the
environment
and
to
contribute
to
the
integration
of environmental
considerations
into
the
preparation
and
adoption
of
plans
and
programmes
with
a
view
to
promoting
sustainable
development.
these
are
to be
applied. It m
ust be
taken
into
account in
the
preparation
of local and
neighbourhood
plans
and
is a
material consideration
in planning
decisions.
The
framework
includes
a presumption
in
favour of sustainable
development and
requires
that local planning
authorities
seek
to
achieve
the
economic, social and
environmental dimensions
of sustainable
development.
States
that the
policies
contained
in
paragraphs
18219
of the
document,
taken
as
a whole, constitute
the
Government’s
view
of what sustainable
development in
England
means
in practice
for the
planning
system.
learning, and
maintain
a healthy labour market
To
reduce
health
inequalities and
promote
healthy lifestyles
To
improve
access to
jobs, facilities, goods and
services and
promote
sustainable
transport
options
To
reduce
deprivation
and
poverty
To
provide
and
improve
access to
a range
of good
quality and
sustainable
employment opportunities
To
develop
a sustainable
and
diverse
economy
To
reduce
the
causes
or adverse
impacts
of clim
ate
change, and
encourage
energy
efficiency
To
protect and
enhance
biodiversity
and
geodiversity
To
protect and
enhance
the
quality
and
character of landscape
and
townscape
To
protect and
improve
air, water and
soil resources
To
reduce
waste
and
encourage
the
sustainable
and
efficient use
of materials
To
protect and
enhance
the
cultural heritage
& historic environment
Stockton
SA
Objectives
To
ensure
stable
levels
of employment and
achieve
high
and
sustainable
levels
of economic
growth.
To
improve
the
viability
and
vitality
of defined
retail centres.
To
implement regional gateways
that contribute
to and
deliver sustainable
economic
growth.
To
ensure
accessibility
for all to
job
facilities, goods
and
services
across
the
Borough.
To
ensure
everyone
has
the
opportunity
of living
in a
decent and
affordable
home.
To
help
improve
the
health
of the
Borough’s
residents
and
reduce
inequalities
in health
by
providing
opportunities
for physical activity.
To
improve
the
opportunity
and
achievement in
education
and
lifelong
learning.
To
promote
safer communities, reduce
and
prevent crime
and
reduce
fear of crime.
To
protect and
enhance
buildings, sites, areas
and
features
of historic, archaeological and
architectural interest and
diversity, and
protect and
enhance
their
settings.
To
protect and
enhance
local distinctiveness
of the
Borough’s
urban
and
rural landscape.
To
ensure
good
local air
quality
for all.
To
protect and
enhance
the
quality
of the
Borough’s
ground, river and
sea
waters.
To
reduce
the
causes
and
impacts
of clim
atic
change.
Reduce
the
risk
of flooding
and
the
resulting
detriment to
people
and
property.
To
reduce
the
amount of waste
produced
and
increase
the
amount recycled, reused
and
recovered.
To
protect and
enhance
biodiversity
and
geodiversity.
Make
better use
of our natural resources
such
as
land
and
soil.
Richmondshire
SA
Objectives
1. Good
quality
employment opportunities
available
to all
2. Conditions
for business
success, economic
growth
and
investment
3. Education
and
training
opportunities
which
build
the
skills
and
capacity
of the
population
4. Quality
housing
available
to everyone
5. Safety
and
security
for people
and
property
6. Conditions
and
services
to
engender good
health
7.Culture, heritage, leisure
& recreation
activities
to
all
8. Prudent and
efficient use
of energy
& natural resources, m
inimal production
of waste
9. Minimise
greenhouse
gas
emissions
and
a managed
response
to the
effects
of clim
ate
change
10. Reduction
of flood
risk
to
people
and
property
11. A
transport
network
which
maximises
access
whilst m
inimising
detrimental impact
12. Minimal pollution
Levels
13. Biodiverse
and
attractive
natural E
nvironment
14. A
quality
built
environment that protects
and
enhances
its
historic
assets
and
efficient land
use
patterns, that m
akes
good
use
of derelict sites, m
inimises
travel
and
promotes
balanced
development
15. Vibrant communities
that participate
in decision
making
16. Local needs
met locally
ability
to
live
independently
throughout their
lives
• Reduce
CO
2
emissions
in the
borough
through
effective
spatial
planning, the
design
of new
buildings,
improved
insulation
and
transport
links
• Reduce
the
fear of
crime
and
antisocial
behaviour
CLIMATE
CHANGE
AND
ENERGY
International/
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
United
Nations
Framework
Convention
on
Climate
Change
Climate
Change
Act (2008) (N6)
Aims
to
improve
carbon
management,
helping
the
transition
towards
a low
carbon
economy
in
the
UK. A
lso
aims
to
demonstrate
UK
leadership
internationally. S
ets
a new
ambitious
target to
ensure
that the
net UK
carbon
account for the
year 2050
is at least 80%
lower than
the
1990
The
Integrated
Regional Framework
for the
North
East (2007) (R1b)
Contains
a regional objective
to adapt to
and
mitigate
against clim
ate
change
The
Tees
Valley
Climate
Change
Strategy
(20102020) (SR2)
Business:
• D
rive
energy
efficiency
and
the
use
Darlington’s
Climate
Change
Strategy
(20062010) &
Sustainable
Community
Strategy
One
Darlington:
Location
of designations, new
development and
allocations
to
follow
the
principles
of the
energy
hierarchy
by
first
Appraisal of potential
locations
of new
development and
site
allocations
to
consider
4
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
(1992),
including
the
Kyoto
Protocol
(2005) (I2)
Objectives
include:
• Reduction
of
greenhouse
gases
to
12.5%
below
1990
levels
by
2012
• Domestic
emissions
reduction
of 20%
• 10%
of electricity
from
renewable
sources
by
2010
• Double
UK’s
Combined
Heat
and
Power
capacity
by
2010
The
Climate
action
and
renewable
energy
package
(2009)
Sets
demanding
clim
ate
and
energy
targets
to
be
met by
2020
(E3):
A
reduction
in EU
ghg’s
of at least 20%
below
1990
levels
20%
of E
U’S
energy
consumption
to
come
from
renewable
resources
A 20%
reduction
in
primary
energy
use
compared
with
projected
levels
to
be
achieved
by
improving
energy
efficiency
baseline.
Carbon
budgets:
22%
reduction
by
200812
28%
reduction
by
201317
34%
reduction
by
201822
Meeting
the
Energy
Challenge: A
White
Paper on
Energy
(2007) (N7)
Sets
out the
Government's
international and
domestic
energy
strategy. Contains
four energy
policy
goals:
• to
put ourselves
on
a path
to cutting
carbon
dioxide
emissions
by
some
60%
(now
80%) by
about 2050, with
real progress
by
2020
• to
maintain
the
reliability
of energy
supplies
• to
promote
competitive
markets
in the
UK
and
beyond
• to
ensure
that every
home
is adequately
and
affordably
heated
Building
a Greener Future: policy
statement (2007) (N8)
This
policy
statement confirm
s the
Government's
intention
for all new
homes
to
be
zero
carbon
by
2016
with
a m
ajor progressive
tightening
of the
energy
efficiency
building
regulations
by
25
per cent in
2010
and
by
44
per cent in
2013
up
to the
zero
carbon
target in
2016.
Climate
Change: The
UK
Programme
(2006) (N9)
Sets
out the
policies
and
priorities
for action
in the
UK
and
internationally
for tackling
clim
ate
change. Development should
strive
to
reduce
the
impact of clim
ate
change.
Stern
Review: The
Economics
of Climate
Change
(2006) (N10)
The
Stern
review
assesses
the
evidence
and
explains
the
economics
of clim
ate
change. T
he
review
states
that ‘there
is still time
to
avoid
the
worst impacts
of clim
ate
change, if w
e take
strong
action
now.’
The
Review
estimates
that if we
don’t
act,
the
overall costs
and
risks
of
clim
ate
change
will
be
equivalent to
losing
at least 5%
of global G
DP
each
year,
now
and
forever.
The
Code
for Sustainable
Homes: Setting
the
standard
in sustainability
for new
homes
(2008)
Sets
standards
for sustainable
residential construction, including
energy
efficiency
and
low/zero
carbon
energy
generation
measures
Climate
Change
Act 2009
The
Act aims
to
improve
carbon
management and
to demonstrate
UK
leadership
internationally
on
emission
reduction.
Key
provisions
include:
A legally
binding
target of at least an
80
percent cut in
greenhouse
gas
emissions
by
2050,
and
a reduction
in emissions
of at least 34
percent by
2020.
Further measures
to
reduce
emissions, including: powers
to
introduce
domestic
emissions
trading
schemes
more
quickly
and
easily
through
secondary
legislation; m
easures
on
biofuels; powers
to
introduce
pilot financial incentive
schemes
in England
for household
waste
DEFRA: How
well
prepared
is the
UK
for climate
change?
(2010)
• Identifies
key
fields
where
improvement is
needed
to
meet the
challenge
of clim
ate
change,
including, Land
use
planning, P
roviding
national infrastructure, Designing
and
renovating
buildings, M
anaging
natural resources, E
mergency
planning.
• Actions
identified
for land
use
planning
include
locating
long
lived
assets
so
as
to
minimise
flood
risk
and
excessive
water use; m
anaging
competing
pressures
on
land, including
for
agriculture; and
including
green
space
in urban
design. For building
design
they
include
water efficiency
measures, flood
resilience
measures, S
UDS
and
allowance
for hotter
weather.
For natural resource
management they
include
habitat creation
protection
and
ecological networks; water efficiency
measures; and
allowance
for changes
to
rivers.
• Advises
on
the
decisionm
aking
process
for adapting
to clim
ate
changeidentifying
‘no
regrets’ options
and
ensuring
options
that require
more
investm
ent are
soundly
based.
• C
oncludes
that ‘Local development planning
policy
is not adequately
considering
adaptation’.
• Local authorities
need
to build
an
understanding
of their
vulnerability
to
current and
future
clim
ate
and
embed
adaptation
into
their
risk
management functions.
• Proposes
the
duty
to cooperate
between
local planning
authorities
as
a way
government
can
ensure
adaptation
at the
landscape
scale.
The
North
East of England
Regional Spatial
Strategy
to
2021
(R2b)
Policy
3 –
clim
ate
change:
•
Help
the
region
to contribute
to meeting
national
policy
as
set out in
the
Energy
White
Paper
•
Plan
for the
successful adaptation
to the
impacts
of clim
ate
change
in the
region
•
Help
the
Region
mitigate
and
adapt to
clim
ate
change
Policy
38
sustainable
construction:
•
Promote
and
secure
greater use
of local
renewable
energy
in development
•
Major new
developments
of m
ore
than
10
dwellings
or 100m
2 of nonresidential floorspace
should
secure
at least 10%
of their
energy
supply
from
decentralised
and
renewable
or low
carbon
sources.
Policy
39
relates
to
renewable
energy
generation:
•
Facilitate
the
generation
of at least 10%
of the
Region’s
consumption
of electricity
from
renewable
sources
within
the
Region
by
2010
•
Aspire
to further increase
renewable
electricity
generation
to
achieve
20%
of regional
consumption
by
2020
•
Facilitate
the
achievement of the
138MW
sub
regional target for the
Tees
Valley
Policy
40
relates
to
planning
for renewables.:
•
Provide
a positive
rather than
a restrictive
framework
for renewables
to
deliver the
maximum
potential for generation
in Darlington
Borough
•
Identify
renewable
resource
areas
•
Consider the
environmental,
social, economic
and
visual effects
of renewable
energy
proposals
•
Consider the
cumulative
impact of w
ind
turbine
proposals
Policy
41
relates
to
onshore
wind
development
•
Rely
on
a substantial contribution
from
wind
energy
to
meet targets
•
Support
wind
farm
s in
urban
areas
and
on
the
urban
rural fringe
North
East Renewable
Energy
Strategy
(2005) (R4)
The
conclusions
of the
strategy
are:
•
the
North
East region
should
adopt to
the
Government’s
targets
and
aspirations
for
renewable
electricity
•
the
region
should
pioneer the
development of
heat only
renewable
energy
and
should
continue
to
encourage
solar power
•
Onshore
wind
remains
the
key
technology
for
achieving
the
targets
of RSS
Policy
40
North
East Strategy
for the
Environment (2008)
(R:es1)
Objectives
to:
•
Ensure
clim
ate
change
is coherently
addressed
in
all policies
and
developments, so
that adaptation
and
mitigation
measures
are
identified
and
implemented
across
all sectors
reinforcing
the
drive
towards
a low
carbon
and
resilient region
of renewable
energy
through
the
planning
system. This
will
help
to
create
local jobs
in insulation,
energy
efficiency, renewable
energy, and
adapting
buildings.
• H
elp
businesses
to
adapt to
clim
ate
change.
Housing
• Ensure
all social housing
stock
achieves
maximum
practicable
energy
efficiency
by
2020.
• M
aximise
opportunities
for
retrofitting
during
refurbishments
of
housing
stock.
• Through
Tees
Valley
Unlim
ited,
investigate
options
for introducing
district heating
in the
Tees
Valley.
We
will
investigate
how
best to
promote
low
carbon
cooling
technology
to
vulnerable
residents.
Transport
• Prioritise
improving
public
and
sustainable
transport
in local
transport
planning, and
increase
the
provision
of facilities
for cyclists
throughout the
Tees
Valley.
• D
evelop
travel plans
to
influence
people's
travel behaviour towards
more
active
and
sustainable
options
such
as
walking, cycling
and
the
use
of public
transport
Other
• In
order to
account for future
clim
ate
change
impacts
on
tourism
in the
Tees
Valley, there
may
be
a need
to
assess
the
future
planning
requirements
needed
for caravan
and
camping
parks. Low
volume
sites
are
not currently
subject to
planning
perm
ission
owing
to
their
temporary
nature. S
ites
placed
near
watercourses
may
be
highly
vulnerable
to
flooding
impacts.
• Physical adaptation
[of heritage
assets
may
be
required
to
supplement m
anagement changes.
Physical adaptation
is likely
to
introduce
a visible
change
for
example, increasing
the
size
and
number of gutters, hoppers
and
down
pipes
to
cope
with
the
projected
increased
in rainfall,
will
become
necessary.
• G
o beyond
minimum
requirements
to
integrate
renewables
in new
developments
where
feasible, and
will
consider how
building
design
can
be
optimised
to reduce
emissions
as
well as
adapt to
clim
ate
change.
Wind
Farm
Development and
Landscape
Capacity
Studies: East
Durham
Limestone
and
Tees
Plain,
ARUP
2008
(&
Addendum, 2009)
The
original report
charactersd
two
Perfectly
Placed
(20082021)
(L2)
A low
carbon
borough
that is
tackling
clim
ate
change
is one
of
the
work
strands
of Darlington’s
SCS. A
s a
result Darlington
Partnership
produced
a clim
ate
change
strategy
that dovetails
with
the
Tees
Valley
Clim
ate
Change
Strategy
and
aims
to:
•
Reduce
Darlington’s
contribution
to clim
ate
change
and
to
minimise
the
adverse
impacts
of clim
ate
change
on
Darlington’s
community
•
reduce
fuel poverty
in
Darlington
ensuring
that
people
have
access
to
affordable
warm
th through
efficient housing, heating
systems
and
appliances
•
Develop
supportive
renewable
energy
policies
•
Promote
energy
efficient
transport
modes
•
Adapt to
clim
ate
change
by
modifying
where
necessary
buildings, settlements,
livelihoods
and
lifestyles
to
cope
with
unpredictable,
varied
and
potentially
extreme
weather
Darlington
Borough
Council
–
Corporate
Plan
20092013
(L3a)
Contribute
to
making
Darlington
sustainable
through
design, layout
and
location
of new
development.
Sustainable
Energy
Action
Plan
(2010)
Outlines
how
the
Council will
achieve
a reduction
in greenhouse
gas
emissions
of 20%
by
2020.
Uses
the
Baseline
Emissions
Inventory
to
identify
actions
to
deliver a
20%
reduction, including
among
others:
• P
otential for domestic
ground
source
heat pumps
• C
ouncil to
encourage
residents
to
install new
double
glazing
• C
ouncil to
encourage
installation
of domestic
solar
therm
al and
solar PV
in new
developments
and
retrofits
through
the
LDF.
• LDF
to
encourage, in
appropriate
locations,
commercial scale
renewable
energy
developments, such
as
combined
heat and
power,
district heating/cooling
schemes
and
wind
energy.
reducing
the
energy
demand
and
greenhouse
gas
emissions
of development through
sustainable
locations, and
making
use
of resources
tied
up
in
the
existing
bult
fabric. .
Location
of new
development
and
allocations
to
consider the
potential for onsite
and
decentralised
renewable
and/or
low
carbon
energy
supply
Should
include
policies
to
encourage
solar therm
al and
solar PV
in new
developments
and
retrofits, and
potentially
also
ground
source
heat pumps,
double
glazing, CHP, district
heating/cooling
and
wind
energy.
Location
of new
development
and
allocations
to
enable
communities
to
take
action
on
clim
ate
change
(reduction
of car
use
by
walking/cycling
etc)
Location
of new
development
and
allocations
to
consider
adaptability
to clim
ate
change
–
for example
likelihood
of flooding
of site. E
specially, long
lived
assets
and
caravan
parks/campsites
should
be
located
so
as
to
avoid
flood
risk
and
excessive
water use.
Location
of new
development
and
allocations
to
protect
greenhouse
gas
sinks
and
green
infrastructure
MPAGDPD
to deliver patterns
of
growth
that help
secure
the
fullest possible
use
of
sustainable
transport.
Recognise
the
importance
of
agriculture, urban
green
space,
and
ecological networks
in
clim
ate
change
adaptation
Allow
for changes
to
rivers
Promote
the
adaptation
of
building
stock
to
a changing
clim
ate, including
by
water
efficiency
measures, S
UDS,
allowance
for hotter weather and
flood
resilience
measures.
Manage
an
increasing
volume
of
energy
efficiency
improvements
arising
from
the
Green
Deal and
potential new
rules
for private
landlords.
impact on
clim
ate
change
i.e:
Proximity
to other
facilities
and
services
Ability
to access
by
walking, cycling
and
public
transport
Potential to
be
connected
to renewable
energy
or low
carbon
sources
Increase/reduction
of
green
infrastructure
Flood
risk
/ other risk
of
potential site
Inclusion
of policies
to
encourage
domestic
solar power,
and
potentially
also
ground
source
heat pumps,
double
glazing, CHP,
district heating/cooling
and
wind
energy.
Include
criteria
of
whether a
policy
will
assist the
installation
of
domestic
and
neighbourhoodscale
renewables, clim
ate
adapted
design,
rainwater harvesting
and
energy
efficiency
measures.
Include
criteria
for
protecting
ecological
networks, urban
green
space, and
high
grade
agricultural land
Include
criterion
for
enabling
natural river
change
and
flood
management m
easures
When
allowing
for visual
impact of renewable
energy
policy, take
into
account in
combination
impacts
with
developments
in
adjacent LPAs.
5
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Energy
Bill (2010)
Part
1: E
nergy
efficiency. Improving
energy
efficiency
by
tackling
barriers
to
investm
ent
through
the
Green
Deal and
measures
to
maximise
its
uptake; new
Energy
Company
Obligation
from
2012
to underpin
the
Green
Deal;
making
energy
perform
ance
data
from
Energy
Perform
ance
Certificates
more
widely
available; extending
powers
to
direct the
roll out
of smart
meters;
The
Bill
would
give
the
SoS
powers
to
make
regulations
governing
the
private
rented
sector,
under which
domestic
landlords
would
be
required
to
honour reasonable
requests
from
tenants
for energy
efficiency
improvements, w
here
a specified
financial support
package
is available.
The
Secretary
of S
tate
could
also
require
local authorities
to
insist that landlords
improve
the
worst perform
ing
homes, again
where
a financial package
is available.
•
Ensure
that energy
generation, efficiency
and
affordability
take
account of environmental issues
in
the
development of policy
and
strategies.
North
East Climate
Change
Adaptation
Plan
(2008)
(R5)
Analyses
the
likely
effects
of clim
ate
change
on
the
region
oand
its
subregions, and
how
these
can
be
mitigated
through
adaptation. F
or example, planning
can
contribute
by
the
use
of existing
legislation
to
discourage
development in
inappropriate
locations, by
relocating
assets
from
atrisk
areas, and
by
identifying
preferential locations
or alignments
of buildings
to
minimise
future
clim
aterelated
risks.
North
East Climate
Change
Action
Plan
(2008) (R6)
A region
wide
action
plan
including
proposed
actions
on
mitigation, adaptation
and
economic
aspects
of
clim
ate
change, w
ith
potential actors
and
timescales
identified.
Warm
Up
North
programme
(201316)
Local m
eans
of delivering
the
Green
Deal.
Funding
for
energy
efficiency
improvements
to
any
domestic
or
public
building
in the
Borough.
areas
in the
Borough:
Barm
pton/Brafferton/Great S
tainton
areaRated
as
one
of the
two
most
suitable
zones
in the
study
area
for
windfarm
development,
but perform
ing
badly
for visisbility.
Sadberge/Bishopton
areaRated
as
of
medium
potential for windfarm
development (i.e. possible
potential for
limited
development).
The
addendum
analysed
the
combined
effect that windfarm
s in
different locations
would
have,
concluding
that a
combination
of
development at M
oor House
and
Newbiggin
would
have
possibly
unacceptable
effects
on
Sadberge.
Darlington
Decentralised
and
Renewable
or Low
Carbon
Study, Entec
2009
(&
Update
2010)
Identifies
general areas
with
potential for renewable
energy
development.
Recommends
a requirement of
10%
renewable/low
carbon
energy
supply
for most developments
and
20%
on
strategic
sites, or requiring
developers
to
link
into
community
heating
networks, or both.
Identifies
likely
growth
in
community
heating
networks
and
similar schemes
Policies
on
the
amenity
effects
of renewable
energy
schemes
should
include
consideration
of
visual impact and
the
in
combination
impacts
of different
developments, including
those
in
adjacent boroughs.
Needs
to
be
able
to deal w
ith
expected
growth
in
neighbourhood
scale
renewable
and
low
carbon
generating
facilities.
Allow
for local communities
to
influence
and
take
action
on
clim
ate
change
e.g. through
consultation
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
International/
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
United
Nations
Framework
Convention
on
Climate
Change
(1992),
including
the
Kyoto
Protocol (2005)
(I2)
As
reviewed
in Clim
ate
Change
and
Energy.
Relates
to
air
quality
Air
Quality
Directive
(08/50/EC) 2008
(E4)
This
Directive
consolidates
existing
legislation
and
establishes
objectives
for ambient air
quality, designed
to avoid,
prevent or reduce
harm
ful
effects
on
human
health
and
the
environment.
Also
aims
to
maintain
air
quality
where
it is
good.
Water Framework
Directive
(2000/60/EC)
(2000) (E5)
Requires
all inland
and
coastal w
ater bodies
to
obtain
‘good
ecological
and
chemical status
by
2015.
Objectives
to:
•
Prevent deterioration
of aquatic
The
Air
Quality
Strategy
for England, Scotland, W
ales
and
Northern
Ireland
(2007) (N16)
The
Strategy
sets
objectives
for eleven
main
air
pollutants
to
protect human
health. E
nsures
ambient air
quality
poses
no
risk
to
human
health
in public
places
and
does
not have
a detrimental effect on
quality
of life.
Pollutants
include:
Particles
PM
10, Particles
PM
2.5, Nitrogen
dioxide, Nitrogen
oxides, Ozone, Sulphur dioxide, P
olycyclic
aromatic
hydrocarbons, B
enzene, 1,3
butadiene, Carbon
monoxide
and
Lead
The
Water Act (2003) (N17)
All public
bodies
will
need
to
consider how
to conserve
water supplied
to
premises. T
arget to
achieve
sustainable
water resources
management by
2012.
Future
Water:
The
Government’s
Water Strategy
for England
(2008) (N18)
States
that w
e need
to
find
ways
of using
water much
more
efficiently
and
sustainably
if we
are
to
continue
to
enjoy
high
standards
and
constant supply.
�Relevant suggestions
for the
LDF
and
SA
framework
include:
•
Reducing
water demand
through
better building
design
•
Increased
use
of rainwater harvesting
to
reduce
reliance
on
public
water supply
•
Investigate
achieving
water neutrality
where
the
total w
ater used
after a
new
development is
no
more
than
that used
before.
•
Prevent pollution
problems
arising
in the
first place
•
Manage
surface
water so
that it can
either be
reused
(through
rainwater harvesting) or by
allowing
it to
perm
eate
naturally
(through
sustainable
drainage
systems)
Making
Space
for Water:
Taking
forward
a new
Government Strategy
for flood
and
coastal erosion
risk
management in
England
(2005) (N14)
The
aim
of the
strategy
is to
manage
the
risks
of flooding
and
coastal erosion
across
England
by
employing
an
integrated
portfolio
of approaches
which
reflect both
national and
local priorities, so
as
to:
• Reduce
the
threat to
people
and
their
property
• Deliver the
greatest environmental, social and
economic
benefit,
consistent w
ith
the
Government’s
sustainable
development principles
To
deliver the
strategy’s
aim
the
Government has
established
a wideranging
programme
of action, centred
around:
• A
more
holistic
approach
North
East
Strategy
for the
Environment (2008)
(R:es2)
Objective
to:
Ensure
the
region’s
atm
osphere
maintains
its
current
high
standards
with
no
future
degradation
in term
s
of air
quality, light
pollution
and
tranquillity
Objective
to:
Protect and
improve
ground, river and
water quality
in
the
region,
ensuring
that water
quality
and
quantity
are
considered
in all
developments
and
managed
in a
sustainable
and
integrated
manner.
Objective
to:
Protect and
improve
the
quality
of
regional land
resources
to
ensure
that land
is used
in a
sustainable
and
innovative
manner.
Environment Agency: River Basin
Management
Plan, Northumbria
River Basin
District (2009) (SR5)
The
plan
encourages:
•
Proactive
implementation
of sustainable
drainage
systems
to
reduce
flood
risk
and
urban
pollution
of surface
waters
during
periods
of high
rainfall
•
Water efficiency
in new
developments
•
Habitat creation
and
river restoration
to
minimise
flood
risk
•
Inclusion
of policies
for water neutrality
for new
developments
Environment Agency: The
Tees
Catchment
Abstraction
Management Strategy
(2008) (SR6)
Target for the
Skerne
Water Resource
Management
Unit
to
change
its
status
from
‘Water Available’ to
‘No
Water Available
by
2014. No
water will
be
available
for
further licensing
at low
flows
but w
ater may
be
available
at higher flows
with
appropriate
restrictions.
Currently, water is
available
at low
flows
with
an
abstraction
limit of 3.8
mega
litres
a day
all year.
Once
the
‘No
Water Available’ status
has
been
reached
the
abstraction
will
be
reduced
to 3.6
mega
litres
for 346
days
a year.
Environment Agency: The
Wear Catchment
Abstraction
Management Strategy
(2006) (SR7)
The
strategy
for the
Magnesian
Limestone
GWMU
is
to m
ove
towards
no
water available
in 2012.
Abstractions
in and
around
the
area
of the
Hell Kettles
SSSI are
constrained
by
conditions
linked
to the
chemistry
in the
ponds. A
bstracted
quantities
will
be
controlled
if the
water chemistry
of the
ponds
changes
Sustainable
Community
Strategy
One
Darlington:
Perfectly
Placed
(20082021)
(L1b)
Promotes
general resource
efficiency
through
reuse
and
recycling
and
building
and
lifestyle
adaptations. T
he
MPAGDPD
should
support
this
theme.
A Greener,
cleaner Darlington
is
one
of the
work
strands
of the
SCS. T
his
work
strands
aims
to
ensure
that:
“an
attractive, liveable
environment is
available
to all
residents, and
especially
people
living
in deprived
areas;
managing
and
reducing
pollution
of land, w
ater,
air
or
noise.”
Darlington
Borough
Council
Strategic
Flood
Risk
Assessment Level 1
(2009)
and
Level 2
(2010)(SR9)
Analyses
flood
risk
in the
borough
as
a whole
and
in more
detail on
suggested
development sites. Identifies
different types
of flood
zones
throughout the
borough, based
Location
of new
development
and
allocations
to
maintain
and
improve
air
quality
– for example
through
sustainable
locations
that reduce
the
need
to
travel.
Focus
development on
the
town
centre.
Manage
surface
water through
the
use
of sustainable
drainage
systems
(SUDS) to
reduce
the
volume
and
rate
of surface
water
run
off
and
the
risk
of flooding,
reduce
runoff
pollution
and
avoid
depleting
groundwater
Pollution
control policies
to
prevent the
pollution
of air, land
and
watercourses/groundwater.
Take
full account of flood
risk
and
ensure
that the
location
of
new
development and
infrastructure
does
not cause
environmental protection
problems
(for example
overflow
of sewerage
systems) during
flood
events
Ensure
that adequate
water,
waste
water and
sewerage
infrastructure
exists
or can
be
provided
appropriate
to
the
scale
and
type
of development.
Lack
of adequate
Appraisal of locations
and
allocations
to
consider their
effects
on
air
quality, w
ater,
flooding, land
and
noise
against the
SA
framework.
Include
the
considerations
in the
Level 1
SFRA
Table
1.2
as
indicators
in the
Sustainability
Framework.
Include
the
development
management
recommendations
of the
SFRA
as
indicators
in
the
Sustainability
Framework.
Include
criterion
for
enabling
natural river
change
and
flood
management m
easures
Include
criterion
of
whether a
policy
will
assist the
installation
of
domestic
and
neighbourhoodscale
renewables, clim
ate
adapted
design,
rainwater harvesting
6
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
ecosystems
and
associated
wetlands
•
Promote
sustainable
use
of w
ater
•
Reduce
pollution
of
water
Groundwater Directive
(80/68/EC) (1980) &
Groundwater Daughter
Directive
(06/118/EC)
2006
(E6)
Aims
to
protect
groundwater from
pollution
by
controlling
discharges
and
disposals
of certain
dangerous
substances
(nitrates
in particular)
to
groundwater.
Soil
Thematic
Strategy
(COM
(2006) 231)
(E7)The
overall objective
of the
Soil Thematic
Strategy
is to
the
protection
and
sustainable
use
of soil,
based
on
the
following
guiding
principles:
•
preventing
further soil
degradation
and
preserving
its
functions;
•
restoring
degraded
soils
to
a level of
functionality
consistent at least
with
current and
intended
use,
considering
the
cost
implications
of the
restoration
of soil.
Environmental Noise
Directive
(2002/49/EC)
(E8)
Aims
to:
Monitor the
environmental
noise
problem; by
requiring
competent
authorities
in Member
States
to
draw
up
"strategic
noise
maps" for
major roads, railw
ays,
airports
and
agglomerations, using
harm
onised
noise
indicators
Address
local noise
issues
by
requiring
competent
authorities
to
draw
up
• Better management of risk
• Landuse
planning
• Rural issues
• Integrated
urban
drainage
management
Flood
and
Water Management Act 2010
Defines
the
lead
local flood
authority
for an
area
as
the
unitary
authority
or the
county
council.
Requires
the
relevant authorities
to cooperate
with
each
other in
exercising
functions
under the
Act.
Requires
a lead
local flood
authority
to
develop, m
aintain, apply
and
monitor a
strategy
for local flood
risk
management in
its
area, consistent with
the
national
strategy..
The
lead
local flood
authority
will
be
responsible
for ensuring
the
strategy
is put in
place
but the
local
partners
can
agree
how
to develop
it in
the
way
that suits
them
best.
The
Act sets
out the
minimum
that a
local
strategy
must contain, and
the
lead
local flood
authority
is required
to consult
on
the
strategy
with
risk
management authorities
(i.e. the
EA, highways
authorities, water companies
etc) and
the
public. Local
authorities
will
need
to
consider the
full range
of m
easures
consistent with
a risk
management approach
in
developing
their
local flood
risk
strategy. Resilience
and
other approaches
which
minimise
the
impact of
flooding
are
expected
to
be
a key
aspect of the
measures
proposed.
Lead
local flood
authorities
must also:
• investigate
flooding
incidents
in its
area
(where
appropriate
or necessary) to
identify
which
authorities
have
relevant flood
risk
management functions
and
what they
have
done
or intend
to
do. T
he
lead
local flood
authority
will
then
be
required
to
publish
the
results
of any
investigation, and
notify
any
relevant authorities.
• maintain
a register of structures
or features
which
they
consider have
a significant effect on
flood
risk
in their
area, at a
minimum
recording
ownership
and
state
of repair. T
he
register must be
available
for inspection
and
the
Secretary
of S
tate
will
be
able
to m
ake
regulations
about the
content of the
register and
records.
Provides
the
lead
local flood
authority
with
powers
to
do
works
to
manage
flood
risk
from
surface
runoff
and
groundwater.
Establishes
a SuDS
Approving
Body
(the
“SAB”)
at county
or unitary
local authority
levels. The
SAB
would
have
responsibility
for the
approval of proposed
drainage
systems
in new
developments
and
redevelopments,
subject to
exemptions
and
thresholds. A
pproval m
ust be
given
before
the
developer can
commence
construction.
In order to
be
approved, the
proposed
drainage
system
would
have
to m
eet new
national standards
for
sustainable
drainage.
The
SuDS
Approving
Body
(SAB) would
also
be
responsible
for adopting
and
maintaining
SuDS
which
serve
more
than
one
property, where
they
have
been
approved.
The
SAB
will
also
be
required
to
place
all approved
sustainable
drainage
systems
on
the
register of structures
and
features
(as
a separate
category).
Local authorities
will
be
able
to use
all their
norm
al powers
(including
in planning) to
support
their
new
roles
under the
Act.
Environment Agency: Groundwater ProtectionPolicy
and
Practice
(documents
14) (2009) (N15)
Part
1 sets
out C
ore
Policy
and
describes
our aims
and
objectives
for groundwater for policy
makers, planners
and
the
public
at large.
Part
2 introduces
basic
groundwater concepts, and
the
principles
of
management,
monitoring
and
risk
assessment that are
used
in groundwater protection, primarily
for a
technically
aware
but nonspecialist audience.
The
Tools
described
in Part
3 are
those
used
by
hydrogeological specialists
in the
assessment and
management of groundwater issues.
Detailed
policies
for different sectors
and
activities
are
set out in
Part
4.
The
Code
for Sustainable
Homes: Setting
the
standard
in sustainability
for new
homes
(2008)
Sets
standards
for sustainable
residential construction
techniques, including
taking
into
account N
Ox
emissions, surface
water runoff, and
the
environmental impact of construction
materials
Environment Agency: River Tees
Catchment Flood
Management Plan
(2009) (SR8)
Darlington
has
between
500
to
1,000
properties
at risk
of a
1%
annual probability
river flood. The
main
risk
of
flooding
comes
from
the
River Skerne
through
Darlington
where
it m
eets
the
River Tees
at Croft
on
Tees. Flooding
in the
central area
of Darlington
could
significantly
affect key
transport
links. T
he
EA
has
proposed
Policy
5 –
Areas
of m
oderate
to
high
flood
risk
to
cover the
Darlington
area. A
ctions
include:
Feasibility
study
of the
potential to
install flood
defences.
Review
sewer and
drainage
capacity
Redesign
culverts
along
West B
eck
Ensure
all emergency
service
buildings, health
care
buildings
and
energy
utility
facilities
that are
at flood
risk
have
contingency
arrangements
in place
W
ork
with
landowners
to
develop
opportunities
for
improved
floodplain
storage
where
possible
Seek
to
influence
sustainable
land
management
techniques
to
help
to reduce
run
off
such
as
buffer
strips
or a
reduction
in drainage
Environment Agency: Tees
Catchment Flood
Management Plan
(2009) (SR10)
The
plan
includes
various
areas
in the
borough
with
different policies
to
be
applied:
•
Neasham/Yarm
area: May
be
opportunities
for
storing
water and
runoff
management.
•
Darlington/Croft
area:
•
Priority
for action
to reduce
flood
risk, potentially
including
flood
defences/review
of sewers
and
drainage.
•
Northern
area
including
Skerne
above
Barm
pton:
Continue
current m
anagement w
hile
reviewing.
Environment Agency: Wear Catchment Flood
Management Plan
(2009) (SR10)
The
plan
includes
a small parcel of land
in the
Borough
which
falls
into
the
Wear Catchment.
The
relevant section
of the
plan
states
that the
EA
will
investigate
to see
if there
are
any
changes
that could
be
made
in managing
the
land. B
y doing
this
they
will
see
if there
is an
opportunity
to
reduce
the
volume
and
speed
of runoff
water,
which
would
reduce
the
effects
of flooding.
on
PPS25, and
gives
guidance
on
the
suitable
approach
to
development for each. P
rovides
a
table
for assessing
the
indicative
acceptability
of
proposed
developments.
11
potential development sites
looked
at in
the
study
are
at
medium
risk
of fluvial flooding.
19
sites
are
at high
risk
of
fluvial flooding
43
of the
46
sites
are
also
at
some
risk
of surface
water
flooding. 16
sites
have
a high
vulnerability
of flooding.
Darlington
Contaminated
Land
Strategy
(2003) (L4)
Sets
out the
council’s
objectives
for dealing
with
contaminated
land
as:
1 Protect human
health
from
significant harm
2
Protect controlled
waters
from
significant harm
3
Protect animals
and
livestock
from
significant harm
4
Protect designated
ecosystems
from
significant
harm
5
Prevent damage
to property
6
Prevent further contamination
of land
7
Promote
and
encourage
voluntary
remediation
8
Encourage
the
reuse
of
brownfield
land
infrastructure/capacity
may
make
a development
unsustainable
and
undeliverable
Location
of new
development
and
allocations
to
take
account
of water abstraction
constraints.
Encourage
water efficient
development,
water neutrality
and
rainwater harvesting
through
policy
Where
possible, prioritise
development and
allocations
on
sustainably
located
brownfield
sites
to
encourage
their
remediation. Include
polies
to
encourage
restoration
of
degraded
land.
Policies
and
sites
to
protect
areas
of high
agricultural value
Location
of new
development
and
allocation
of land
to
consider cumulative
effects
on
Darlington’s
environmental noise
quality
Apply
Level 1
SFRA
Table
1.2
to
all proposed
development
allocations
Development m
anagement
policies
to
reflect the
recommendations
of the
SFRA
on
managing
flood
risk, and
to
encourage
development of flood
resilience
measures.
Enable
the
actions
stated
in the
Tees
Catchment F
lood
Management P
lan
including
works
to
flood
defences
and
water storage
MPAGDPD
production
should
be
closely
tied
to
production
of
the
local flood
risk
management
strategy.
and
energy
efficiency
measures.
Include
criterion
of
whether a
policy
focuses
development on
the
town
centre.
Include
criteria
reflecting
the
recommendations
of
the
SFRA
7
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
action
plans
to
reduce
noise
where
necessary
and
maintain
environmental noise
quality
where
it is
good.
BIODIVERSITY
AND
GEODIVERSITY
International/
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for
the
SA
UN
Convention
on
Biological Diversity
(1992) (I3)
Objectives
include:
•
Conservation
of
biological
diversity
•
Sustainable
use
of biodiversity
•
Fair
and
equitable
sharing
of genetic
resources
Target to
achieve
a
significant reduction
in
biodiversity
loss
by
2010
The
Habitats
Directive
(92/43/EC)
(1992) (E9)
Aims
to:
Contribute
to
ensuring
biodiversity
through
the
conservation
of
natural habitats
and
of
wild
fauna
and
flora
of
EU
importance. A
central component of
the
directive
is the
creation
of the
Natura
2000
network
of
Special A
reas
of
Conservation
(SACs)
for threatened
species
and
habitats
The
Birds
Directive
(97/49/EC) (1997)
(E10)
Requires
the
protection
and
conservation
of bird
species
by;
• Designation
of
Special
Protection
Areas
(SPAs) for rare
or
vulnerable
species
listed
in
Annex
1
• Banning
of
deliberate
killing
or
Working
with
the
Grain
of Nature: A
biodiversity
strategy
for England
(2002) (N21)
Government vision
for:
“a
country
– its
landscapes
and
water bodies, coasts
and
seas, towns
and
cities
– where
wild
species
and
habitats
are
part
of healthy
functioning
ecosystems; w
here
we
nurture, treasure
and
enhance
our biodiversity, and
where
biodiversity
is a
natural consideration
of
policies
and
decisions, and
in society
as
a whole”.
Natural Environment and
Rural Communities
Act (2006) (N22)
Section
40
of the
Act places
a duty
on
all public
authorities
to
have
regard
to
the
purpose
of conserving
biodiversity
– The
biodiversity
duty.
Planning
Policy
Statement 9: Biodiversity
and
Geological Conservation
(2005) (N23)
Aims
to:
• Promote
sustainable
development through
the
conservation
and
enhancement of biodiversity
and
geological diversity
• Ensure
that E
ngland’s
wildlife
and
geology
are
sustained
through
conservation, enhancement and
restoration
• Contribute
to
rural renewal and
urban
renaissance
by
enhancing
biodiversity
in green
spaces
and
developments
and
ensuring
that the
value
of biodiversity
is taken
into
account
The
Code
for Sustainable
Homes: Setting
the
standard
in sustainability
for new
homes
(2008) (N15)
Sets
standards
for the
ecological value
of development sites
Wildlife
and
Countryside
Act 1981
(as
amended) (NWC)
Principle
mechanism
for the
legislative
protection
of wildlife
in Great B
ritain. A
ct m
akes
it an
offence
to:
• Intentionally
kill, injure
or take
any
wild
birds
or their
eggs
or nests
• Intentionally
kill, injure
or take, possess
or trade
in any
wild
animals
and
prohibits
interference
with
places
used
for shelter or protection
• Pick, uproot,
trade
in or posses
certain
wild
plants
The
Act:
• Includes
measures
for preventing
the
establishment of nonnative
species
• Provides
for the
notification
of S
SSI’s
• Prohibits
the
undertaking
of agricultural or forestry
operations
on
land
within
National P
arks
which
has
been
either moor or heath
for 20
yrs
• Requires
authorities
to
maintain
up
to
date
definitive
maps
and
statements
for the
purposes
of clarifying
public
rights
of way
The
Countryside
and
Rights
of Way
Act 2000
(N:CROW)
•
Provides
a new
right of public
access
on
foot to
areas
of m
ountain, m
oorland, heath, downland
and
registered
common
land.
•
Provides
safeguards
which
take
into
account the
needs
of landowners, occupiers
and
wildlife
•
Improves
the
right of w
ay
legislation
by
encouraging
the
creation
of new
routes
•
Introduces
powers
enabling
the
diversion
of rights
of w
ay
to
protect S
SSI’s
•
Places
a duty
to have
regard
for the
conservation
of biodiversity
and
maintain
lists
of species
and
habitats
for which
conservation
steps
should
be
taken
•
Places
a duty
on
public
bodies
to
further the
conservation
and
enhancement of S
SSI’s
•
Requires
authorities
to
have
regard
to
the
purposes
of conserving
and
enhancing
the
natural beauty
of A
ONB’s
State
of the
Natural Environment 2008
(N:SONE)
Identifies
why
the
natural environment is
valuable
and
what aspects
are
valued
most:
landscapes
and
Geodiversity, biodiversity,
opportunities
for recreation, employment and
inspiration. Identifies
the
following
pressures
on
the
natural environment:
•
Invasive
species
and
diseases
•
Biomass
crop
production
(risks
and
opportunities)
•
Agricultural intensification
(drainage
of wetlands, demise
of m
ixed
farm
ing
schemes
etc)
•
Under management of woodlands
•
Nutrient enrichment of terrestrial and
aquatic
habitats
•
Toxic
chemicals
that enter the
environment on
a daily
basis
(pesticides, herbicides, industrial chemicals
etc)
A Biodiversity
Audit
of the
North
East (2001) (R6)
The
audit:
• determ
ines
the
contribution
the
North
East m
akes
to
the
nation’s
threatened
biodiversity;
• form
s an
interm
ediate
step
between
national
and
local
biodiversity
plans,
identifying
those
UK
priorities
relevant to
the
Region;
• identifies
species
and
habitats
that
are
not national
priorities
but
which
are
considered
to be
important at the
regional level;
North
East
Strategy
for the
Environment (2008)
(R:es3)
Objective
to
Conserve, enhance
and
manage
biodiversity
and
geodiversity
for their
own
sake
and
to
make
the
North
East
a better place.
State
of the
Environment
Report
for the
North
East (2004)
(R: SERNE)
Identifies:
• Loss
to
small
woodland
areas
less
than
2ha
• 62%
SSSI’s
in
unfavourable
condition
Tees
Valley
Green
Infrastructure
Strategy
(2008)
(SR10)
Key
aim
of the
strategy
is to
develop
by
2021
a
network
of green
corridors
and
green
spaces
that:
•
Enhances
the
quality
of place
for existing
and
future
communities
and
potential investors;
•
Provides
an
enhanced
environmental context for
new
development,
regeneration
projects
and
housing
market renewal,
and
produces
high
quality
design
and
developments;
•
Creates
and
extends
opportunities
for access,
regeneration, and
enhancement of biodiversity,
and
•
Provides
a buffer against the
effects
of clim
ate
change
Tees
Valley
Biodiversity
Action
Plan
The
aim
of the
Action
Plan
is to
provide
a series
of
structured
action
priorities
for all those
organisations
and
individuals
working
to conserve
biodiversity
in the
Tees
Valley
area. T
he
BAP
is a
living
document with
plans
produced
for individual habitats
and
species.
. BAP
habitats
in the
Town
Centre
Fringe
include:
‘Rivers
and
Streams’
Actions: A
chieve
Water Framework
Directive
target of
good
ecological potential; Support
and
encourage
the
use
of buffer strips
along
watercourses
to
improve
riparian
habitat and
water quality; Identify
opportunities
to
restore
engineered
and
culverted
watercourses,
particularly
in urban
areas. A
lso
to
prevent further deterioration
to
existing
rivers
and
streams.
Brownfield
Land
Actions: Increase
extent of early
successional open
mosaic
habitat by
carrying
out on
site.
management work..
Identify
and
protect the
most
important sites
through
Local S
ites
designation
review.
Water vole:
Ensure
existing
populations
are
protected, and
their
habitat enhanced
and
extended
through
development control and
flood
risk
operations.
GCN
Strengthen
and
expand
known
metapopulations
by
carrying
out pond
creation
and
management work
through
the
Tees
Valley
Pondscape
Project.
Harvest m
ouse
Develop
suitable
habitat links
around
current sites
to
allow
species
to
extend
range
Sustainable
Community
Strategy
One
Darlington
Perfectly
Placed
(20082021) (L1c)
Expanding
the
green
network
to
improve
biodiversity
is a
work
strand
of the
SCS
Darlington
Open
Space
Strategy
(20072012) (L5a)
Aims
to
provide,
protect and
enhance
a
variety
of high
quality, accessible
open
and
green
spaces
throughout
the
Borough, linking
with
the
cultural and
natural heritage
of
the
area. It
recognises
the
importance
of open
spaces
to
biodiversity
particularly
the
important role
open
spaces
provide
for
opportunities
to
learn
about nature.
Darlington
Tree
and
Woodland
Strategy
(2011)
Street trees
should
be
retained
and
new
ones
planted
in
appropriate
sites.
Sets
conditions
for
works
to
TPO’d
trees
and
woodland.
We
will
impose
planning
conditions
to
protect trees
according
to BS
5837
(2005)
We
will
resist
development,
which
it
is considered
makes
inadequate
Location
of new
development and
allocations
(unless
green
infrastructure)to
avoid
areas
of high
biodiversity
value
and
to
ensure
continued
protection
of
DBAP
habitats
and
species
and
SSSI’s, and
potential
links
in ecological
networks. A
lso
policies
and
designations
to
protect
those
features.
MPAGDPD
to consider
where
biodiversity
can
be
enhanced, especially
to
develop
ecological
networks
– possibly
include
locations
on
proposals
maps
Protect,
create
and
enhance
green
infrastructure
to provide
new
or enhanced
opportunities
for
biodiversity/geodiversity
and
increase
access
to
nature
learning
opportunities. In
particular
create
species
rich
grassland, ponds
and
reedbeds, SUDS, improved
riparian
habitat,
urban
habitat networks
including
unmanaged
space,
woodland
and
wet
woodland, hedgerows.
Required
to
undergo
Habitat Regulations
Assessment.
Protect S
PAs
and
SACs
and
consider
impacts
on
habitats
that
could
be
utilised
by
Annex
1
migratory
birds
away
from
the
SPA
site.
Ensure
location
of new
developments
and
allocations
will
not restrict
the
movement of species
and
ability
for species
to
The
SA
framework
objectives
and
indicators
should
be
utilised
to
appraise
the
MPAGDPD
against the
following
criteria:
•
Conservation
and
enhancement of
natural/semi
natural habitats
and
species
•
Protection
of
designated
habitats
and
listed
species
•
Habitat
connectivity
(prevention
of
habitat
fragmentation)
Enhancement of
overall biodiversity
(creation
of habitats,
including
open
•
spaces)
•
Conservation
and
protection
of
geological
interests
•
Contact
with/understandi
ng
of biodiversity
•
Ability
for
species
to
adapt
to clim
ate
change
Include
criterion
of
protecting, enhancing
and
encouraging
the
management of
ecological networks
Make
habitat creation
criteria
more
specific
8
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
BIODIVERSITY
AND
GEODIVERSITY
International/
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for
the
SA
capture, destruction
or removal of nests
and
eggs,
disturbance
during
breeding
or rearing
of Article
1 species
• Establishment of a
general scheme
of
protection
for all
wild
birds
•
Clim
ate
change
England
Biodiversity
Strategy: Climate
Change
Adaptation
Principles
(2008)
Identifies
direct impacts
as:
• Changes
in phenology, w
hich
may
lead
to
loss
of synchrony
between
species
• Changes
in species
abundance
and
distribution
(including
arrival and
loss
of species)
• Changes
in community
composition
• Changes
in ecosystem
processes
Principles
for adaptation
include:
1. Take
action
now
to conserve
existing
biodiversity
and
high
quality
habitats, reduce
nonclim
atelinked
sources
of harm
, and
use
existing
biodiversity
legislation
2. Maintain
and
increase
ecological resilience
by
conserving
range
and
ecological variability
of habitats
and
species, m
aintaining
existing
ecological networks, creating
buffer zones
around
high
quality
habitats, and
taking
prompt action
to
control spread
of invasive
species
3. Accommodate
change
by
making
space
for the
natural development of rivers, establishing
ecological networks
through
habitat
restoration
and
creation, aiding
gene
flow, developing
the
capacity
of institutions
and
administrative
arrangements
to
cope
with
change
and
learn
from
experience, and
responding
to
changing
conservation
priorities.
4. Integrate
action
across
partners
and
sectors
by
integrating
adaptation
and
mitigation
measures, integrating
policy
and
practice
across
relevant economic
sectors, building
and
strengthening
partnerships
and
raising
awareness
of benefits
of the
natural environment to
society
5. Develop
knowledge
and
plan
strategically
by
undertaking
vulnerability
assessments
of biodiversity
and
associated
ecosystem
goods
and
services
without delay, undertaking
scenario
planning
and
implementing
no
regrets
actions, piloting
new
approaches
and
monitor,
identifying
potential w
inwin
solutions
and
ensure
crosssectoral knowledge
transfer,
monitoring
actual impacts
and
research
likely
future
impacts, improving
understanding
of the
role
of biodiversity
in ecosystem
services, and
researching
knowledge
gaps
with
stakeholder
participation
Climate
change
and
biodiversity
adaptation: the
role
of the
spatial planning
system
(2009) (N16)
DPD
should
reflect C
ore
Strategy
principles
in respect to
natural environment constraints
and
minimise
impacts
upon
recognised
environmental assets. W
here
development briefs
are
presented
within
the
DPD, it m
ay
be
appropriate
to address
landscape
and
habitat
connectivity
issues
where
these
are
relevant.
Also
gives
guidance
for sustainability
appraisal, including
recognising
the
problems
caused
to biodiversity
by
clim
ate
change, and
the
need
for specific
policies
to
deal w
ith
those
problems
Conservation
of Habitats
and
Species
Regulations
(2010)
Habitat Regs
Assessment m
ust be
carried
out if the
DPD
is likely
to have
a significant effect on
a European
site.
The
LDF
must contain
policies
encouraging
the
management of features
of the
landscape
which
are
of m
ajor importance
for wild
fauna
and
flora, such
as
hedgerows, river corridors, ponds
and
small woods.
The
Natural Choice: Securing
the
value
of nature
(White
paper,
DEFRA, 2011)
•
Set up
Nature
Improvement A
reas, where
there
is an
opportunity
to restore
and
connect nature
on
a significant scale. Local
authorities
can
include
these
in their
local plans
(while
not deterring
sustainable
development).
•
Pilot the
offsetting
of biodiversity
planning
requirements
by
developers
in some
local auithorities.
•
The
Government is
committed
to providing
appropriate
protection
to
ancient woodlands
and
to more
restoration
of plantations
on
ancient woodland
sites.
•
Update
landscape
character area
profiles, to
include
inform
ation
on
the
ecosystem
goods
and
services
they
provide.
•
The
forthcoming
Water White
Paper will
consider mechanisms
to
encourage
the
retrofit of S
uDS
on
both
community
and
individual
property
scales.
• NNR’s
contribute
20%
to
the
national total of
87697ha
• Insufficient
monitoring
of
farm
land
birds
Broadleaved
mixed
lowland
woodland
Support
the
creation
of new
native
woodland
through
EWGS, and
the
restoration
to favourable
condition
of ASNW
(including
PAWS),
promoting
these
scheme
to TVBP
partner
organisations
and
other landowners.
Hedgerows
Encourage
the
planting
of new
hedgerows
in
keeping
with
local character (including
hedgerow
trees),
through
agrienvironment
schemes, particularly
along
historic
boundaries
that w
ere
once
hedged.
Lowland
meadow
Designate
lowland
meadows
as
Local W
ildlife
Sites.
Ponds, lakes
and
reservoirs
Encourage
the
creation
of new
ponds
as
part
of the
landscaping
of new
developments
by
producing
and
promoting
a best practice
guide
for
planners
and
developers.
Roadside
Verges
Ensure
that all relevant habitat policy
is included
in
local planning
documents
and
supplementary
planning
guidance
where
relevant,
to
protect,
enhance
or create
new
landscape
features
of
wildlife
importance
along
transport
corridors
and
to
ensure
that ecological surveys
are
undertaken
prior
to the
determ
ination
of new
transport
schemes.
Tees
Valley
Geodiversity
Action
Plan
Targets
to
conserve
existing
geodiversity
sites
and
designate
new
ones, and
ensure
they
are
included
in
local authority
plans.
provision
for the
retention
of trees
and
other woody
plants
and
natural
features, particularly
wildlife
habitats
such
as
woodlands.
adapt to
clim
ate
change,
and
policies
protect and
enhance
varied
landscapes
through
which
species
can
move.
Location
of new
development and
allocations
to
consider how
green
infrastructure
can
be
incorporated
Encourage
agri
environment schemes
and
farm
ing
techniques
beneficial to
farm
land
species. Policies
should
ensure
species
rich
grassland
has
infrastructure
for grazing
by
appropriate
livestock.
Take
into
account the
needs
of bats
Incorporate
model
woodland
policy
when
it
emerges.
Make
space
for the
natural
development of rivers.
Conserve
any
geodiversity
sites, existing
or future, and
make
sure
they
are
incorporated
in the
plan.
Include
policy
for the
retention
of trees, in
particular street trees, and
of woodland.
WASTE
AND
MINERALS
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for
the
SA
EU
Landfill
Directive
(99/31/EC) 1999
(E11)
Aims
to
deliver a
step
change
in the
Waste
Strategy
for England
(2007) (N24)
The
Governments
objectives
are
to:
• decouple
waste
growth
(in
all sectors) from
economic
growth
and
put m
ore
emphasis
on
waste
prevention
and
reuse;
• meet and
exceed
the
Landfill Directive
diversion
targets
for biodegradable
municipal w
aste
in 2010, 2013
and
2020;
• increase
diversion
from
landfill of nonm
unicipal w
aste
and
secure
better integration
of treatm
ent for municipal and
nonm
unicipal w
aste;
• secure
the
investm
ent in
infrastructure
needed
to
divert
waste
from
landfill and
for the
management of hazardous
waste; and
The
Integrated
Regional Framework
for the
North
East
(2007) (R1c)
Recognises
that
minimising
the
use
of
Consultation
on
Tees
Valley
Joint Waste
Management
Strategy
(2008) (SR11)
The
principles
of this
strategy
are:
• To
reduce
waste
generation
Sustainable
Community
Strategy
One
Darlington
Perfectly
Placed
(20082021) (L1d)
Tees
Valley
Minerals
and
Waste
documents
should
provide
for the
requirements
of
development levels
The
SA
should
take
into
account the
findings
of the
SA
undertaken
on
the
Tees
Valley
Joint W
aste
Management S
trategy
and
the
Joint Minerals
and
Waste
9
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
way
waste
is
disposed
of and
will
help
drive
waste
up
the
hierarchy
through
waste
minimisation
and
increased
levels
of
recycling
and
recovery. Targets
are
set to:
•
Reduce
biodegradable
waste
landfilled
to
75%
of 1995
levels
by
2010
•
Reduce
biodegradable
waste
landfilled
to
50%
of 1995
levels
by
2013
•
Reduce
biodegradable
waste
landfilled
to
35%
of 1995
levels
by
2020
• get the
most environmental benefit from
that investm
ent,
through
increased
recycling
of resources
and
recovery
of energy
from
residual w
aste
using
a mix
of technologies.
Targets
include:
• recycling
and
composting
of household
waste
– at least 40%
by
2010, 45%
by
2015
and
50%
by
2020; and
• recovery
of m
unicipal w
aste
– 53%
by
2010, 67%
by
2015
and
75%
by
2020
Strategy
for Sustainable
Construction
(2008) (N25)
The
strategy
identifies
that the
construction
industry
in England
uses
around
400
million
tonnes
of m
aterials
every
year.
Around
90
million
tonnes
of CD&E
inert
waste
is produced, with
half of this
recycled
as
aggregates, including
at the
site
of production. E
stimates
suggest at least a
further 20
million
tonnes
of
noninert
and
mixed
CD&E
waste
is also
produced
annually. A
s a
result
the
strategy
sets
a target of:
• By
2012, a
50%
reduction
of construction, demolition
and
excavation
(CD&E) waste
to landfill compared
to
2008.
Planning
Policy
Statement 10: Planning
for Sustainable
Waste
Management (2005) (N26)
The
LDF
should:
• help
deliver sustainable
development through
driving
waste
management up
the
waste
hierarchy, addressing
waste
as
a resource
and
looking
to disposal
as
the
last option, but one
which
must be
adequately
catered
for;
• provide
a framework
in which
communities
take
more
responsibility
for their
own
waste, and
enable
sufficient and
timely
provision
of waste
management
facilities
to
meet the
needs
of their
communities;
• reflect the
concerns
and
interests
of communities, the
needs
of waste
collection
authorities, waste
disposal authorities
and
business, and
encourage
competitiveness;
• protect green
belts
but recognise
the
particular locational needs
of some
types
of w
aste
management facilities
when
defining
detailed
green
belt
boundaries
and, in
determ
ining
planning
applications, that these
locational needs, together with
the
wider environmental and
economic
benefits
of
sustainable
waste
management,
are
material considerations
that should
be
given
significant w
eight in
determ
ining
whether proposals
should
be
given
planning
perm
ission;
• ensure
the
design
and
layout of new
development supports
sustainable
waste
management.
Minerals
Planning
Statement 1: Planning
and
Minerals
(2006) (N27)
Sets
out the
importance
of m
inerals
in enabling
the
creation
and
development of sustainable
communities
and
the
overall aim
to:
• ensure, so
far as
practicable, the
prudent,
efficient and
sustainable
use
of m
inerals
and
recycling
of suitable
materials, thereby
minimising
the
requirement
for new
primary
extraction
The
Code
for Sustainable
Homes: Setting
the
standard
in sustainability
for new
homes
(2008)
Sets
standards
for incorporating
waste
management m
easures
in new
homes
National and
Regional Guidelines
for Aggregates
Provision
20012016
(N:agg)
Specifies
the
aggregate
provision
for the
north
East for a
sixteen
year period
as
follows:
• Land
won
sand
and
gravel –
20
tonnes
• Land
won
crushed
rock
– 119
tonnes
• Marine
sand
and
gravel –
9 tonnes
• Alternative
materials
76
tonnes
The
figures
reflect an
overall fall in
national demand
for aggregates
and
a substantial increase
in use
of alternatives
to
primary
aggregates, notably
construction
and
demolition
waste.
Until revised
guidelines
for the
period
2005–2020
are
adopted
form
ally
the
2001–2016
Guidelines
for Aggregates
Provision
in England
remain
extant and
must continue
to be
used
by
the
relevant authorities
in the
plan
preparation
process.
our resources
is
fundamental to
the
pursuit
of sustainable
development in
our
region. Must ensure
that all individuals
and
organisations
are
prudent and
ethical in
their
use
of m
aterial
resources, m
inimising
consumption,
increasing
efficiency
and
using
renewable
rather than
non
renewable
resources
where
possible.
North
East Strategy
for the
Environment
(2008) (R:es4)
Objectives
to:
Ensure
that
opportunities
to
implement the
principles
of
sustainable
consumption
are
identified
and
delivered
throughout
the
region.
Manage
the
region’s
waste
in an
efficient
and
sustainable
manner,
emphasising
waste
reduction
and
maximising
opportunities
to
use
waste
as
a resource
through
reuse,
recycling
and
energy
recovery.
• To
be
achievable
and
affordable
• To
work
towards
zero
Landfill
• To
minimise
the
impact on
clim
ate
change
• To
have
an
accountable
and
deliverable
structure
• To
contribute
towards
economic
regeneration
Joint Minerals
and
Waste
Development Plan
Documents
for the
Tees
Valley
(2011) (SR12)
New
development in
the
Tees
Valley
including
new
houses,
shops, industry, offices
and
community
buildings
will
require
minerals
for
construction
purposes
and
for
use
in industrial processes.
These
new
developments
will
also
produce
waste
which,
along
with
the
waste
from
existing
developments, needs
to
be
managed.
Planning
policies
are
therefore
required
to
ensure:
• that sufficient quantities
of
minerals
are
available
at the
right time;
• that the
waste
generated
is
dealt
with
in a
sustainable
way
which
reduces
the
use
of landfill;
and
that the
• environment and
amenity
of
residents
in the
Tees
Valley
is
safeguarded
Reducing
waste
generation
and
increasing
the
re
use
and
recycling
of
waste
is a
long
term
outcome
of the
SCS.
identified
in the
Core
Strategy.
Development P
lan
Documents.
The
SA
should
take
into
account the
impact of
developments
proposed
through
the
Tees
Valley
Joint
Waste
and
Minerals
Development P
lan
Documents. W
hilst those
documents
do
not m
ake
any
specific
proposals
for sites
in
Darlington
borough, they
do
include
policies
that cover the
Borough, and
also
the
development of sites
around
the
Tees
estuary
and
in
Hartlepool is
likely
to have
an
impact on
the
capacity
of
Darlington’s
road
and
railw
ay
network.
ECONOMY
AND
EMPLOYMENT
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for
the
SA
Lisbon
Strategy:
Towards
a Europe
of Innovation
and
Knowledge
(2000)
(E12)
Recognises
the
weaknesses
of the
European
labour
market as:
•
insufficient
number of jobs
Planning
Policy
Statement 4:
Planning
and
economic
growth
(2009)
Seeks
to
deliver
sustainable
economic
growth
by:
•
Building
prosperous
communities
through
improving
the
The
Integrated
Regional Framework
for the
North
East (2007) (R1d)
States
that the
NE
region
is im
proving
its
economic
perform
ance
but is
still
the
lowest perform
ing
region
in term
s
of economic
wealth
in England.
Defines
Sustainable
as
“economic
growth
that can
be
sustained
and
is
within
environmental limits
but also
enhances
the
environment and
social
welfare
and
avoids
greater extremes
in
future
economic
cycles”.
Tees
Valley
Economic
and
Regeneration
Statement of Ambition
(2010)
Ambitions
include:
Drive
the
Transition
to the
High
Value
Low
Carbon
Economy
Including
by
Pioneering
the
use
of resource
recovery
Continuing
the
process
of business
support, developing
clusters
and
local supply
chains
Developing
a skills
package
Refine
the
strategic
planning
industrial framework
to
demonstrate
a
localised
and
accountable
application
of National P
olicy
Statements
for
developments
in the
Tees
Valley
that are
important to
the
national economy.
Develop
a fast track
planning
process
by
working
proactively
with
e.g. the
HA, E
A, NE
and
the
HSE
to
agree
protocols
with
each
to reduce
existing
delays
in the
planning
process;
Sustainable
Community
Strategy
One
Darlington
Perfectly
Placed
(20082021) (L1e)
Prosperous
Darlington
is one
of
the
five
delivery
themes
of the
SCS. T
he
work
strands
under
this
theme
include:
• Quality
of life
– focuses
on
promoting
arts, leisure
and
cultural development,
regenerating
the
town
fringe,
attracting
high
profile
companies, enhanced
transport
choice
and
accessibility
and
maintaining
an
attractive
green
environment
• Employment O
pportunities
– im
prove
the
range
of high
quality
premises
available, increase
employment
MGP
DPD
to identify
sufficient land
for employment purposes
Location
of new
development sites
and
land
allocations
to
positively
contribute
to promoting
the
vitality
and
viability
of the
town
centre
Prioritise
mixed
use
sites
within
the
town
centre
/ town
centre
fringe
Location
of new
development sites
and
land
allocations
to
contribute
to
Appraise
the
locations
for
development against
economic
criteria
relating
to:
Meeting
need
for
employment land
Whether the
location
of the
development
will
detract or
improve
the
viability
of the
town
centre
or
10
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
ECONOMY
AND
EMPLOYMENT
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for
the
SA
being
created
in
the
services
sector,
even
though
this
is
by
far the
most
important in
term
s of
employment;
•
a high
rate
of
longterm
unemployment;
•
labour supply
does
not m
atch
demand
•
a shortage
of
women
participating
in
the
labour
market;
•
European
demographic
trends, in
particular an
ageing
population.
economic
perform
ance
of
cities
and
towns;
•
Reducing
the
gap
in
economic
growth
rates
between
regions,
promoting
regeneration
and
tackling
deprivation;
•
Delivering
more
sustainable
patterns
of
development;
•
Promoting
the
vitality
and
viability
of town
and
other
centers
as
important
places
for
people; and
•
Raising
the
quality
of life
and
the
environment in
rural areas
by
promoting
thieving,
inclusive
and
locally
distinctive
rural
communities
whilst
continuing
to
protect open
countryside
for
the
benefit of
all.
Leading
the
Way: Regional
Economic
Strategy
(2006) (R7)
Aims
to
ensure
sustainable, economic
growth
by:
• Promoting
participation
and
economic
inclusion
through
activity
to
help
people
to contribute
to and
benefit from
economic
growth
• Developing, preserving
and
promoting
a healthy
and
vibrant
cultural clim
ate
that will
facilitate
improved
economic
perform
ance
• Driving
economic
growth
through
innovation, skills, investment,
enterprise
and
competition
• Promoting
the
reduction
of adverse
environmental impact in
pursuit
of
economic
development
The
North
East Rural Action
Plan
(2002) (R9)
Sets
out ten
priority
areas
in which
action
needs
to
be
taken
to
bring
about a
revival in
the
Region’s
rural
economy. T
hese
are:
• the
need
for a
coordinated
approach
to
the
development of a
regionallyembedded
food
chain
• influencing
National and
EU
rural
policy
• the
development of tourism
and
culture
• building
a diversified
rural economy
• planning
authorities’ development
plans
need
to include
policies
that
promote
sustainable
development
• investing
in m
arket towns
and
local
service
centres
• making
the
most of inform
ation
communication
technology
• recognise
the
time
needed
to
build
effective
capacity
in communities
and
‘rural proof’
regeneration
programmes
• integrate
rural transport
• develop
new
ways
of working
in the
rural context
Moving
Forward: The
Northern
Way
Growth
Strategy
(2004) (RN)
Sets
an
agenda
for bridging
the
£29
billion
output gap
between
the
North
and
the
rest of the
UK. Sets
the
following
vision:
“Together,
we
will establish
the
North
of England
as
an
area
of
exceptional opportunity
combining
a
worldclass
economy
with
a
superb
quality
of life.”
City
regions
are
considered
key
to
any
Pursue
strategic
land
acquisitions
Im
proving
the
capacity
of the
rail network
Investing
in innovative
delivery
vehicles
to
bring
forward
development land,
upgrade
utilities, run
steam
and
heat networks
and
remove
barriers
to
investm
ent such
as
infrastructure
and
Government policy.
Ambition
2: C
reate
a More
Diversified
and
Inclusive
Economy
by
promoting
growth
in the
service
and
retail sector,
digital and
creative
industries, healthcare, the
relocation
of government departments
(especially
to
Darlington),
financial and
business
services,
logistics, the
visitor economy, and
manufacturing
and
engineering
(the
strengths
of D
arlington
companies
in
this
field
are
highlighted
elsewhere
in the
report);
create
an
office
and
industrial property
market
independent of the
public
sector;
and
generate
graduate
and
spinoff
businesses.
continue
to develop
our quality
of place
so
that it appeals
to
prospective
workers, residents
and
visitors.
Specifically
refers
to
Darlington:
Darlington
Town
Centre, Central P
ark
and
the
Town
Centre
Fringe
we
will
continue
to promote
Darlington
as
the
gateway
to
the
Tees
Valley
and
one
of our
main
centres, emphasising
its
history
as
a market town
with
independent shops,
and
the
ambience
this
creates; Darlington's
mainline
(both
road
and
rail)
location
characteristics
provide
a competitive
location
for advanced
engineering, and
business
and
professional services
firms;
We
also
recognise
the
needs
of the
communities
outside
the
urban
areas
where
business
incubation
space
and
connectivity
will
be
vital to
encourage
increased
entrepreneurship.
We
will
ensure
that the
range
of housing
available
caters
for the
spectrum
of needs
and
aspirations, not
least by
providing
for households
identified
as
being
fundamental to
Tees
Valley's
future
economy.
Increase
current levels
of housing
growth, ensuring
that enough
land, in
the
right locations, is
available
for developers
to
meet current and
future
demand
for
owneroccupied
housing;
Bring
the
privately
rented
stock
up
to a
decent standard;
Increase
the
supply
of affordable
housing, including
using
our empty
homes
and
enabling
more
households
to
become
owner occupiers
through
"interm
ediate
tenure" schemes;
All new
housing
should
be
sustainable
in term
s of energy
demand, use
of m
aterials,
method
of construction, consumption
and
disposal of water,
and
quality
of design, so
that they
add
to
the
overall stock
and
add
to
the
sense
of place
without adversely
affecting
the
environment.
Continue
to
promote
our coastal and
rural assets
Actively
promote
naturebased
and
outdoor activities
and
heritage
and
innovation;
It will
be
important to
ensure
that economic
perform
ance
is underpinned
by
resilience, w
hich, from
an
environmental perspective
relates
to clim
ate
change. T
his
entails
understanding
the
risks, planning
for
impacts
(such
as
enhanced
flood
protection),
seeking
to ensure
the
continuity
of key
services, and
business
contingency
planning.
Continue
to
invest in
our bus
network
alongside
the
20
or so
routes
that will
benefit from
significant investment in
the
coming
years, examining
cost effective
ways
to
provide
linkages
to
the
core
commercial routes
that w
ill benefit from
investm
ent in
the
next five
years, and
developing
an
integrated
smart
ticketing
system
alongside
other partners
in the
North
East.
Tees
Valley
Investment Plan
(Draft) (2010)
Priorities
for creating
a low
carbon
economy
include:
• supporting
further growth
of the
chemicals
and
petrochemicals
sectors;
• developing
the
offshore
wind
and
nuclear sectors
and
a large
scale
carbon
capture
and
storage
network;
• develop
existing
expertise
in advanced
engineering
and
materials, including
identifiying
opportunities
for that sector to
benefit from
development of energy
projects;
• deliver the
infrastructure
for large
scale, low
carbon
industrial investm
ent,
including
strategic
site
assembly
and
transport
investment;
• build
necessary
skills
through
apprenticeships
and
training.
Priorities
for creating
a diversified
and
low
carbon
economy
include:
• strengthening
the
research, innovation
and
enterprise
capacity
of our Universities, C
olleges
and
other
key
innovation
institutions
• reduce
barriers
to
enterprise
and
private
sector investment in
the
digital and
creative
industries;
opportunities
and
attract higher paid
jobs
• Accessible
Darlington
– maintain
and
enhance
Darlington’s
accessibility
by
rail,
air
and
road
and
promote
the
use
of ICT
and
broadband
technologies
to
reduce
the
need
to
travel
• Growing
Skills
– get the
right skills
available
in Darlington
to
support
the
growth
of high
value
companies
• Sharing
Prosperity
• Diversity
of O
pportunity
– the
local economy
provides
enough
opportunity
for people
to want to
stay
in
Darlington
• Distinctive
Darlington
– Create
a clear and
consistent
identity
for Darlington
Darlington
Gateway
Strategy
(2006) (L7)
Darlington
has
been
identified
as
a Gateway
to
the
Tees
Valley
that if capitalised
upon
can
generate
economic
and
development activity. T
he
Darlington
Gateway
aims
to
build
on
the
success
already
achieved
by
logistics
and
office
based
employment as
a result of both
its
unique
location
on
the
A1(M
), the
East Coast Main
Line
and
the
Airport
together
with
the
quality
of life
provided
by
its
tradition
as
an
historic
market town. Key
projects
are
office
development at Morton
Palms, new
logistics
development at Faverdale, the
development of D
arlington
Town
Centre, Central P
ark,
Lingfield
Point and
the
promotion
of rail heritage
Adding
to
Quality
: A
Development Strategy
for
Darlington
Town
Centre
(2001) (L9)
The
vision
of the
Strategy
is to
improve
the
value
of the
town
centre
as
an
asset for the
local economy
and
thereby
enhance
its
value
to the
social and
cultural life
of the
community.
The
LDF
will
need
to provide
a positive
framework
to
encourage
the
following
relevant aspects:
• Give
the
pedestrian
priority
within
the
main
shopping
streets
• Im
prove
connections
between
the
core
and
areas
outside
the
ring
road.
• Provide
high
quality
public
realm, capable
of being
used
for activities
which
will
bring
commercial as
well as
social
benefits
to
the
centre.
• To
strengthen
connections
between
the
northern
and
southern
parts
of the
prime
retail area, and
between
the
prime
and
the
secondary
areas, particularly
Skinnergate.
• To
use
the
major sites
to
introduce
comprehensively
planned, m
ixeduse
developments.
• To
improve
the
environment of the
centre, taking
advantage
of its
natural and
historic
assets.
• To
repair
the
damaged
parts
of the
centre, reintroducing
appropriate
uses, built
form
and
design
quality.
• To
expand
the
availability
of m
odern
office
space
Darlington
Borough
Council
– Corporate
Plan
20092013
(L3b)
Priority
to Im
plement m
ajor development projects. A
ctions
relevant to
the
LDF
include:
regeneration
activities
and
key
development projects
such
as
Central P
ark, Lingfield
Point etc,
Prioritise
employment land
allocations
in m
ain
settlements,
however,
ensure
that the
location
of
employment sites
will
also
support
diversification
of the
rural economy
where
identified
Location
of new
development sites
and
allocations
to
relate
well to
other
areas
of employment and
housing
Ensure
infrastructure
either is
or can
be
put in
place
to support
identified
locations
of employment sites.
Policies
to
encourage
resource
recovery, even
if not necessarily
in
the
Borough
but on
Teesside
Demonstrate
a localised
and
accountable
application
of National
Planning
Statements
for
developments
important to
the
national economy
Support
rail capacity
improvements
Support
steam
and
heat networks
Protect and
enhance
Darlington’s
strengths
in advanced
engineering
(helping
that sector to
take
advantage
of energy
developments),
market town
atm
osphere
with
independent retailers, business
and
professional services, logistics
Grow
the
offshore
wind
and
nuclear
sectors
and
Carbon
Capture
and
Storage
and
develop
infrastructure
for them
Support
business
incubation
space
and
connectivity
in rural settlements
Improve
the
housing
offer by
providing
more
middle
and
toprange
homes
and
affordable
housing,
improving
nondecent housing
and
ensure
new
housing
is sustainable.
Coordinate
policies
on
Building
for
Life
with
other Tees
Valley
LPAs.
Promote
naturebased
and
outdoor
activities
and
heritage
and
innovation. E
specially, promote
the
not
Whether the
locations
contribute
to
regeneration
activity
or key
projects
Whether rural
economies
will
be
influenced
positively
or negatively
by
the
locations
Whether employment
land
relates
well to
existing
employment
sites
and
housing
(accessibility
by
workforce)
Whether the
necessary
infrastructure
to
support
economic
developments
is or
can
be
provided
Include
criterion
on
resource
recovery
Include
criterion
on
whether a
policy
supports
rail and
bus
network
enhancements
Include
criterion
on
development and
protection
of the
town
centre,
especially
its
market
town
ambience
Include
criterion
on
promoting
nature
based
and
outdoor
leisure
activities
Include
criterion
on
promoting
the
Borough’s
railw
ay
heritage
Include
criterion
on
making
sure
infrastructure
is
resilient to
clim
ate
change
Include
criterion
on
making
sure
all
policies
affecting
the
development of
11
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
ECONOMY
AND
EMPLOYMENT
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for
the
SA
effort
to
achieving
this
vision
and
identified
areas
of work
include:
• bringing
more
people
into
work
• driving
up
innovation
building
entrepreneurship
• capturing
more
global trade
• m
eeting
employers' skills
needs
• improving
connectivity
• building
quality
homes
and
places
• m
arketing
the
North
to
the
world.
business
and
financial services
(including
in offshore
wind, outsourced
public
sector business
processes
and
‘onshored’ financial services; C
entral P
ark
and
Lingfield
Point m
entioned; logistics
and
distribution
and
health
and
social care
• facilitate
local delivery
of BIS’s
national inward
investment and
business
support
programmes
• develop
workforce
skills
and
tackle
worklessness
• Investing
in quality
of place: this
has
sub
objectives
that include
providing
mixed
use
development
schemes
to
strengthen
town
centres; increasing
levels
of owner occupied
and
executive
housing
growth; bringing
rented
stock
up
to a
decent standard; increasing
the
supply
of affordable
housing,
including
interm
ediate
tenure; ensureing
housing
is fit for the
aging
population
and
those
with
special
needs
(including
develop
consistent,
Tees
Valleywide
planning
policies
on
delivering
‘lifetime’ homes
based
on
the
less
restrictive
‘Building
for Life’ m
odel; develop
sustainable
communities. Improving
public
transport
infrastructure
Tees
Valley
Advanced
Manufacturing
Sector Plan
Multiple
objectives
including:
Increasing
the
availability
of industrial premises:
To
increase
investm
ent in
manufacturing
activities.
To
increase
the
stock
of suitable
premises
for manufacturing
businesses.
To
raise
the
image
of Tees
Valley
and
highlight that it is
a good
location
for manufacturing
businesses.
To
ensure
that there
are
sites
for inward
investors
and
those
existing
businesses
wishing
to expand.
Generate
a database
of available
premises
and
developable
sites.
Map
and
quantify
barriers
to
use, e.g. land
contamination, lack
of services.
Engage
the
planning
authorities
with
a view
to them
setting
out the
details
of their
planning
processes
to
minimise
uncertainty
and
increase
transparency.
…Seek
to
broaden
the
geographic
coverage
of the
Enterprise
Zone.
Tees
Valley
Digital Sector Plan
Multiple
objectives
including:
A cluster for digital businesses
in each
local authority
areawell supported
by
infrastructure,
competitively
priced
and
designed
according
to the
needs
of such
businesses.
Well integrated
and
supported
start
up
space.
Tees
Valley
Logistics
Sector Plan
Attract additional investment to
the
key
infrastructure
in the
Tees
Valley, focused
around
the
key
logistics
hubs
Firms
to
identify
which
specific
areas
of infrastructure
need
the
greatest priority
in seeking
investm
ent.
Ensure
current gauge
widening
work
is completed
in a
timely
manner and
occurs
interregionally
so
high
and
wide
loads
can
be
transported
from
Teesport
throughout the
Tees
Valley
and
to other logistics
hubs
elsewhere
in the
country
(e.g. E
ast and
West M
idlands).
Understanding
improvements
that competitor Logistics
locations
are
taking.
Investigate
and
learn
from
successful Logistics
hubs
such
as
Rotterdam
and
identify
transferable
examples
of best practise
which
could
be
used
to shape
future
investm
ent in
the
Tees
Valley
Logistics
sector
Increase
availability
of land
Review
of local authority
land
assets
to
see
if any
of these
would
be
suitable
sites
for certain
types
of
private
development.
Similarly, investigate
the
potential to
release
any
sites
that have
been
stymied
for
development.
Conduct a
market study
which
makes
recommendations
on
feasibility
of allocating
large
logistics
site
in
Tees
Valley
as
part
of next round
of LDF
process.
Investigate
the
suitability
of E
nterprise
Zone
sites
and
incentives
and
align
with
the
needs
of firms
seeking
additional sites.
Recognise
the
importance
of ensuring
speedy
approvals
of planning
applications
in relation
to large
Logistics
development,
in recognition
of the
strategic
importance
of Logistics
sites
in the
Tees
Valley.
Identify
specific
sites
where
convoluted
patterns
of land
ownership
are
preventing
developments
from
occurring
Consider the
release
of unused
local authority
land
for suitable
developments
with
planning
concessions.
Work
with
land
bank
owners
to
open
up
their
land
for developments.
Examine
the
possibility
of using
compulsory
purchase
orders
(CPOs) for land
so
that important Logistics
developments
can
occur.
•
The
Oval
•
University
Campus
•
Morton
Palms
•
Town
Centre
Fringe
•
Central P
ark
•
Faverdale
Strategic
site
•
Feethams/Beaumont S
treet
•
Durham
Tees
Valley
Airport
•
Lingfield
Point
Vibrant new
mixed
use
quarter Beaumont S
treet office
development site; F
eethams
area; T
own
Centre
Fringe
to
east of Inner Ring
Road
Darlington
Partnership: Draft
Economic
Strategy
and
Action
Plan
(2012)
The
right place
Develop
a new
approach
to
promoting
Darlington
to
businesses, investors
and
visitors
within
and
beyond
the
UK,
building
on
key
themes
including
our international rail
heritage
Develop
and
promote
the
cultural,
leisure, retail and
housing
offer within
the
Borough
to support
economic
growth
(including
development of key
town
centre
sites)
The
right people
Im
prove
the
skills
of the
labour force
(current and
future) to
ensure
that they
match
the
needs
of existing
and
potential
employers
Retain
talent in
the
local labour market
The
right infrastructure
Fix
immediate
issues
that prevent economic
growth
(including
digital and
energy
needs
and
capacity
problems
on
the
transport
network)
Influence
investm
ent decisions
to
support
the
economic
development of D
arlington
The
right business
conditions
Support
the
development of supply
chain
opportunities
to
both
the
public
and
private
sector
Develop
sector action
plans
to
maximise
existing
and
future
economic
opportunities
Work
to
develop
a strong
business
support
offer in
Darlington
that caters
for the
needs
of all businesses
(existing, newly
form
ed
and
prospective
start
ups) –
identifying
gaps
in provision
and
work
with
others
to
fill them
Have
an
appropriate
range
of new
start
and
growon
property
available
throughout Darlington
Borough’s
railw
ay
heritage.
Plan
for infrastructure
resilient to
clim
ate
change
Allocate
key
town
centre
sites
Ensure
policies
affecting
employment
development are
clear and
provide
certainty
and
the
capacity
for quick
decision
making.
Provide
supported
premises
for start
up
businesses
employment sites
are
clear.
Identify
constraints
affecting
potential
employment sites.
12
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
EDUCATION
AND
SKILLS
European
National
Regional
Local
Key
implications
for the
MPAG
DPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
Strategic
framework
for
European
cooperation
in
education
and
training
(2009)
(E13)
Sets
benchmarks
for 2020:
�at least 95%
of children
between
the
age
of four and
the
age
for starting
compulsory
primary
education
should
participate
in early
childhood
education;
�the
share
of 15years
olds
with
insufficient abilities
in
reading, m
athematics
and
science
should
be
less
than
15%;
�the
share
of early
leavers
from
education
and
training
should
be
less
than
10%;
�the
share
of 3034
year olds
with
tertiary
educational
attainment should
be
at least
40%;
�an
average
of at least 15
% of
adults
(age
group
2564)
should
participate
in lifelong
Learning
DCSF
The
Children’s
Plan: Building
Brighter Futures
(2007) (N33)
Sets
out goals
for achievement by
2020
in
relation
to children
and
young
people’s
educational attainment and
wellbeing.
● enhance
children
and
young
people’s
wellbeing,
● every
child
ready
for success
in school
● every
child
ready
for secondary
school, with
at least 90
per cent
achieving
at or above
the
expected
level
in both
English
and
mathematics
by
age
11;
● every
young
person
with
the
skills
for
adult
life
and
further study, w
ith
at least
90
per cent achieving
the
equivalent of
five
higher level G
CSEs
by
age
19; and
at least 70
per cent
achieving
the
equivalent of two
A levels
by
age
19;
● all young
people
participating
in
positive
activities
to
develop
personal
and
social skills
●
employers
satisfied
with
young
people’s
readiness
for work;
● child
health
improved, with
the
proportion
of obese
and
overweight
children
reduced
to 2000
levels;
● child
poverty
halved
by
2010
and
eradicated
by
2020
The
LDF
can
assist with
the
delivery
of
these
goals
through:
•
Educational buildings
to
make
space
for colocated
services
•
Provision
of youth
facilities
The
Interated
Regional Framework
for the
North
East (2007) (R1e)
States
that if the
North
East is
to
achieve
its
ambition
as
a place
where
people
can
fulfil their
potential and
contribute
to a
dynamic
economy,
then
each
person
must have
the
appropriate
skills
and
competencies. R
ealising
the
potential of each
individual in
the
North
East will
contribute
to a
sustainable
economy.
Actions
include:
• Provide
a diverse
range
of learning
opportunities
• stimulate
a substantial increase
in people’s
aspirations
and
expectations
of learning
and
work.
• Ensure
that all people
are
supported
to
develop
a
solid
skills
base
for employability
and
to
provide
a
base
for further learning.
• Ensure
that there
is a
sufficient supply
of higher
level skills
to
underpin
and
front economic
growth
priorities
and
meet employer needs.
The
North
East of England
Regional Spatial
Strategy
to
2021
(R2g)
Policy
14
relates
to
further and
higher education.
The
LDF
should
support
the
growth
and
increasing
role
of universities
and
colleges
in the
regional
economy
by:
• Recognising
their
role
in the
transition
to
higher
productivity
and
a m
ore
knowledgebased
economy
• Encouraging
greater links
with
local business
• Enabling
the
necessary
infrastructure
and
campus
development to
facilitate
their
expansion
• Support
the
emerging
Science
City
concept
• Im
prove
access
to
learning
and
training
opportunities
through
ICT
and
transport
infrastructure
in urban
and
rural areas
Sustainable
Community
StrategyOne
Darlington
Perfectly
Placed
(20082021) (L1e)
Aspiring
Darlington
theme
aims
to:
• Address
the
gaps
in educational attainment
• Provide
the
widest possible
range
of lifelong
learning
opportunities
• Equip
people
coming
out of education
with
the
skills
needed
to
work
in the
modern
local economy
• Attract and
retain
graduates
• Recognise
and
develop
the
significant role
played
by
the
arts
and
culture
in personal development
• Expand
the
existing
range
of arts
and
cultural businesses
and
services
• Provide
high
quality
facilities
that support
modern
approaches
to
education
in schools
and
for lifelong
learning
• Make
the
most of the
Darlington
University
Centre
proposal to
complement and
strengthen
learning
opportunities
and
contribute
to
building
a vibrant and
diverse
quality
of life.
Darlington
Borough
Council
– Corporate
Plan
20092013
(L3c)
Actions
include
Ensure
there
is a
job
or place
for every
school leaver
Narrow
the
gap
in education
outcomes
and
improve
life
chances
for all children
and
young
people
Darlington
Children
and
Young
People’s
Plan
2008
– 2011
(L12a)
Priorities
in relation
to education
and
skills
include:
• Make
school interesting
and
encourage
everyone
to
attend
• Im
prove
school buildings
and
playgrounds
• Make
sure
that all young
people
have
access
to
education, training
and
work
that m
eets
their
needs
• Im
prove
people’s
skills
so
they
are
ready
to
get a
job
• Support
aspirations
Darlington
Primary
Capital Programme
20082011
(L13)
The
overall aim
of the
Primary
Capital P
rogramme
is to
rebuild, remodel or improve
at least half
of all primary
schools. Targets
include:
• To
ensure
all children
are
taught in
a high
quality
environment by
elim
inating
the
worst 5%
• To
ensure
schools
are
fit for 21st century
teaching
and
learning
by
rem
odelling
15%
of the
least suitable
teaching
areas;
• To
replace
all temporary
accommodation
with
perm
anent classrooms.
• To
ensure
there
is a
place
for every
pupil by
adding
300
places
to
the
primary
sector over the
next 5
years
and
to
monitor the
ongoing
affect of inward
migration
• To
improve
the
physical environment at every
school to
ensure
that it does
not create
a barrier to
inclusion
(meets
the
universal rating
as
a
minimum).
To
use
ICT
to inspire, empower and
motivate
and
promote
flexible
methods
of curriculum
delivery.
Location
of housing
sites,
mixed
use
sites
and
existing
and
new
gypsy
and
traveller sites
to
consider the
accessibility
and
current capacity
of
schools
and
other form
al
and
inform
al educational
establishments
Include
policies
to
facilitate
improvements
to
school buildings
and
playgrounds, and
infrastructure
and
campus
development at university
and
college
sites
Facilitate
the
expansion
of
the
existing
range
of arts
and
cultural businesses
and
services
Appraisal of
locations
to
consider
accessibility
to
educational
establishments
and
capacity
of
such
Include
criterion
on
whether
policy
will
facilitate
the
expansion
of
arts, culture
and
education
services.
TRANSPORT
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
White
Paper:
European
Transport
Policy
for 2010: Time
to
decide
(2001) (E15)
In this
white
paper
and
in keeping
with
the
sustainable
development
strategy
the
Commission
proposes
some
60
measures
aimed
at
developing
a
European
transport
system
capable
of
The
Future
of Transport: A
Network
for
2030
(2004) (N36)
Aims
to
provide
a transport
network
that m
eets
the
needs
of a
growing
economy
and
the
increasing
demand
for travel w
hile
taking
into
consideration
the
environment.
The
network
aims
to:
• Provide
a freeflowing
and
more
reliable
road
network
• Im
prove
the
efficiency
of rail services
• Ensure
bus
services
are
reliable, flexible,
convenient and
tailored
to local needs
• Have
walking
and
cycling
as
viable
alternatives
for local journeys
• Delivering
a Sustainable
Transport
The
Integrated
Regional
Framework
for the
North
East (2007) (R1f)
Priority
actions
to
meet the
IRF’s
objective
to develop
sustainable
transport
and
communication
include:
• Balance
the
economic
requirements
for
national and
international travel w
ith
the
need
to
reduce
our
carbon
emissions.
• D
evelop
sustainable
transport
networks
to
support
rural
Subregional context contained
within
Darlington’s
LTP2
(SR13)
Specific
aims
that future
transport
improvements
across
the
Tees
Valley
will
need
to address
are:
•
improve
access
to
the
north’s
sea
ports
(principally
Teesport);
•
improve
surface
access
to
key
northern
airports
(in
particular Durham
Tees
Valley);
•
create
premier transit
systems
in each
city
region
(in
the
first instance
by
stemming
the
decline
in bus
use, and
then
supporting
wider regeneration
with
a subregional
transit
system);
•
create
stronger links
between
regions
(notably
the
neighbouring
Tyne
and
Wear
and
Leeds
City
Regions);
and
Sustainable
Community
Strategy
– One
Darlington
Perfectly
Placed
(20082021) (L1f)
A
sustainable
transport
network
is one
of the
work
strands
of the
SCS. T
his
work
strands
aims
to
ensure
that:
• safe
and
accessible
transport
choices
are
available
for all
• vehicle
use
and
emissions
are
reduced
• the
transport
network
supports
sustainable
economic
growth
and
regeneration
• Im
prove
public
transport
• Tackle
congestion
• Expand
walking
and
cycling
networks
Darlington
Borough
Council
– Corporate
Plan
20082012
(L3d)
Top
transport
related
priorities
include:
Rollforward
and
further develop
the
Local M
otion
and
Cycle
Town
sustainable
development programmes
Develop
parks/countryside
green
exercise
agenda
Darlington’s
Transport
Strategy
20062030
(L14)
Prioritise
location
of new
development and
allocations
to
reduce
the
need
to travel.
For example
locations
that are
served
or could
be
served
by
ICT, w
alking, cycling
and
public
transport
networks
and
are
within
close
proximity
to
facilities, services
and
activities. Include
polices
to
restrict development outside
such
sites, in
particular the
Town
Centre.
Need
to
demonstrate
that
locations
will
not add
The
appraisal of
the
locations
suggested
will
need
to
take
into
account their
ability
to:
Reduce
the
need
to
travel
Reduce
or at
least not add
to
congestion
Improve
travel
safety
in the
Borough
Improve
13
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
TRANSPORT
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
shifting
the
balance
between
modes
of
transport, revitalising
the
railw
ays,
promoting
transport
by
sea
and
inland
waterways
and
controlling
the
growth
in air
transport.
In particular
policies
aim
to:
• Address
the
imbalance
between
the
overuse
of road
and
air
transport
and
the
underuse
of rail and
sea
modes
• Im
prove
the
links
between
all
methods
of
transport
• Need
for
interconnected
infrastructure
• Place
users
at the
heart
of transport
policy, in
particular address
safety
concerns
• Rationalise
urban
transport
– current
lack
of integrated
policy
approach
to
town
planning
and
transport
is
allowing
the
private
car an
almost total
monopoly
System
2008
(N: DASTS)
Recognises
that transport
plays
a key
role
in
all our lives. S
ets
goals
that take
into
account
transports
wider impact on
clim
ate
change,
health, quality
of life
and
the
natural
environment:
• To
support
national economic
competitiveness
and
growth
by
delivering
reliable
and
efficient transport
networks
• To
reduce
transports
emissions
of carbon
dioxide
and
other greenhouse
gases, w
ith
the
desired
outcomes
of tackling
clim
ate
change
• To
contribute
to better safety, security
and
health
and
longer life
expectancy
by
reducing
the
risk
of death, injury
or illness
arising
from
transport, and
by
promoting
travel m
odes
that are
beneficial to
health.
• To
promote
greater equality
of opportunity
for all citizens
with
the
desired
outcome
of
achieving
a fairer society; and
To
improve
quality
of life
for transport
users
and
nontransport
users, and
to promote
a
healthy
natural environment
communities, taking
account of changes
to
public
services.
• Embed
sustainable
transport
policy
within
local development
frameworks, including
encouragement of
production
of
sustainable
travel plans.
• Encourage
the
use
of
ICT
as
an
alternative
to
travel,
including
the
potential for home
working
and
changes
to
travel patterns
to
increase
efficiency
and
reduce
carbon
emissions
The
North
East of
England
Regional
Spatial Strategy
to
2021
(R2h)
Policy
49, 50
and
51
relates
to
transport. The
LDF
needs
to:
• Improve
sustainable
accessibility
and
efficiency
of m
ovement
• Encourage
public
transport
that
rebalances
the
transport
system
in
favour of m
ore
sustainable
modes
• Improve
connectivity
North
East Strategy
for
the
Environment (2008)
(R:es5)
Objective
to:
Develop
sustainable
transport
solutions
by
reducing
the
need
to
travel
and
adopting
more
sustainable
practices
and
technologies.
•
create
truly
sustainable
communities.
The
first three
of the
above
list are
probably
the
most influential for forward
transport
planning
at
the
sub
regional level,
as
they
require
cross
boundary
working
both
within
and
outside
the
Tees
Valley.
Tees
Valley
Area
Action
Plan
(2009)
Plans
for the
future
transport
needs
of the
Tees
Valley
area
at a
strategic
scale, taking
into
account changing
travel patterns, regeneration
areas
and
likely
future
congestion
points.
Plans
for improvements
to
the
A66
east of
Darlington, including
signalisation
of the
Great
Burdon
and
DETC/A66
junctions
and
remodelling
of the
A66/Yarm
Road
junction
(in
the
medium
term
) and
dualling
of the
trunk
road
between
those
junctions
(in
the
long
term
).
Plans
for the
development of a
Tees
Valley
Metro
frequent service
between
Darlington
and
Saltburn.
Tees
Valley
City
Region
Transport
Strategy
(2007)
Contains
objectives
including:
To
maximise
accessibility
opportunities
to
the
revitalising
Tees
Valley
economy
and
associated
services
(health, education, leisure, etc) for all
sections
of society, particularly
those
without
private
transport.
To
address
the
decline
in bus
use
and
provide
a
stable
and
sustainable
network
that m
eets
passenger demands
and
avoids
the
rapid
growth
in
car usage
currently
being
experienced
in areas
with
more
vibrant
economies.
To
attract the
necessary
investm
ent to
deliver
the
required
improvements
in the
local rail network, the
sub
region
will
look
towards
more
innovative
solutions. T
his
applies
equally
to
passenger
services/facilities
and
improved
freight capacity,
which
is of particular
importance
to Teesport
and
other local industry.
To
manage
the
projected
growth
in demand
in a
sustainable
way
that
still allows
widespread
regeneration
to
continue
without creating
congestion, or being
constrained
by
itmostly
through
the
LDF
The
overarching
Transport
Strategy
for Darlington
seeks
to:
• improve
accessibility
to services
and
opportunities
by
providing
travel options, so
that all may
participate
in
the
life
of their
community;
• tackle
traffic
congestion
and
its
associated
effects
on
local communities
through
a focus
on
sustainable
travel choices, thus
contributing
to residents’ quality
of life;
• make
the
transport
network
safe
and
secure
for all;
and
• deliver solutions
to
travel needs
in partnership
with
local people, businesses
and
other providers.
Darlington, A
Town
on
the
Move: Second
Local Transport
Plan
200611
(L15)
LTP2
aims
to
deliver against Darlington’s
Transport
Strategy
in the
following
areas:
• To
provide
the
framework
for sustainable
development of new
and
existing
businesses, housing
and
services
in Darlington;
• To
improve
access
to
employment and
education, particularly
for those
without access
to
a private
car,
those
with
a disability
and
those
that have
greatest need;
• To
tackle
traffic
congestion
on
key
corridors
and
its
potential affects
on
the
economy
and
environment by
making
the
most effective
use
of the
transport
network;
• To
improve
travel safety
and
security
for all by
addressing
the
real and
perceived
risks;
• To
provide
and
promote
travel choices
to
all,
in particular to
reduce
the
proportion
of car driver trips;
• To
improve
the
health
of the
community
through
increasing
levels
of sustainable
travel and
improving
access
to
health, leisure
and
fresh
food.
Local Motion, Darlington
Sustainable
Travel Demonstration
(L16)
Targets
included:
• 10%
reduction
in car driver trips
by
2010/11
• 8%
increase
in walking
trips
by
2010/11
• Increase
cycle
trips
from
1%
to
3%
of all trips
by
2010/11
• To
halt
the
decline
in bus
trips
by
2010/11
Darlington
Rights
of Way
Improvement Plan
(L22)
Identifies
that access
to
good
quality
countryside
is im
portant for mental and
physical health
as
it provides
opportunities
for safe
outdoor recreation
and
exercise, for relaxation
and
escape
from
the
stresses
of urban
life. O
bjectives
relevant to
the
LDF
include:
• Provide
muchimproved
access
for all people, to
semi natural areas
and
the
countryside.
• The
need
for good
quality, accessible
routes
near to
where
people
live
• Better access
across
physical barriers, especially
the
road
network, but also
on
the
ROW
network
itself.
Third
Local Transport
PlanDraft
(2010)
Proposes
the
following
policies
(summary)
• Integrate
land
use
and
transport
planning
at all stages
of the
planning
process
using
the
3 pronged
approach
• Exploit
the
potential of rail,
bus
and
car sharing
to employment,
leisure
and
shopping
opportunities
• Reduce
the
need
to travel;
continue
to
promote
sustainable
travel for shorter journeys; and
work
in
partnership
to
develop
and
promote
lower carbon
transport
options
for longer trips.
• A
joint approach
between
the
Council and
Public
Health
with
shared
resources
to
increase
levels
of walking
and
cycling, in
a safe
environment,
to
secure
multiple
outcomes
• Evaluate
and
support
initiatives
that enable
older people
to travel particularly
those
without a
car and
those
in
rural areas
• Prioritise
funding
on
the
basis
of m
aintaining, then
managing, then
improving
transport
and
travel,
and
provide
greater decision
making
at a
local level
• Maintain
and
manage
the
highway
network
and
improve
waiting/parking
facilities
particularly
at the
rail
station
and
town
centre
unacceptably
to congestion
at
problem
points
along
the
highways
network. W
here
increased
congestion
is
anticipated, m
itigation
measures
such
as
highways
improvements
may
be
required. The
feasibility
of
these
improvements
would
need
to
be
investigated.
Need
to
demonstrate
that any
safety
concerns
with
the
locations
put forward
could
be
addressed, for example
through
traffic
calming,
pedestrian
crossing
schemes
etc
Ensure
the
necessary
highways
infrastructure
is or
could
be
put in
place
to
support
the
proposed
locations
Proceed
in an
integrated
fashion
with
the
3rd
Local
Transport
Plan
Include
full complement of
highways
policies
needed
to
ensure
that traffic
arising
from
new
development is
a)
minimised
and
b)
accommodated
safely.
Tailor development to
support
existing
public
transport,
especially
bus, routes.
Facilitate
development of T
ees
Valley
Metro
including
new
stations, and
road
and
rail
upgrades.
Facilitate
improvement of
waiting
and
parking
facilities
for buses
and
coaches,
especially
in the
Town
Centre.
Protect walking
and
cycling
routes, including
their
attractiveness
to
users.
connectivity
of
travel m
odes
Include
specific
criterion
on
focussing
development in
the
Town
Centre.
Include
criterion
on
highway
safety
Include
criterion
on
congestion
Include
criterion
on
facilitating
the
improvement of
rail and
bus
routes
(inc. bus
stop
facilities)
Include
criterion
of protecting
and
improving
walking/cycling
routes
14
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
COMMUNITIES
National
Regional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
Strong
and
Prosperous
Communities: The
Local Government White
Paper (2006) (N39a)
The
aim
of the
White
Paper is
to
give
local people
and
local communities
more
influence
and
power to
improve
their
lives. Local communities
should
be
•
Consulted
and
involved
in running
services
•
Inform
ed
about the
quality
of services
in their
area
•
Enabled
to
call local agencies
to
account if services
fail to
meet their
needs.
Safer Places: The
Planning
System
& Crime
Prevention
(2004) (N42)
Instructs
Local P
lanning
Authorities
to
consider crime
prevention
and
enhancement of community
safety. Crime
prevention
is relevant to
sustainable
communities
National Service
Framework
for Older People
(Department of Health) (2001) (N44)
Addresses
the
needs
of older people
in accordance
with
the
fact that England
is an
ageing
society. S
ets
8 standards
for the
care
of older people
across
health
and
social services, which
are:
• Rooting
out age
discrimination
• Personcentred
care
• Interm
ediate
care
• General hospital care
• Reduce
the
incidence
of stroke
• Reduce
the
number of falls
• Good
mental health
• Promotion
of health
and
active
life
in older age
Every
Child
Matters: Change
for Children
(2004) (N45a)
The
Government's
aim
is for every
child, whatever their
background
or their
circumstances, to
have
the
support
they
need
to:
•
Be
healthy
•
Stay
safe
•
Enjoy
and
achieve
•
Make
a positive
contribution
•
Achieve
economic
well being
Living
Places: Cleaner,
Safer,
Greener (2006) (N46)
Recognises
that public
spaces
are
a barometer of a
community
and
quality
of life. S
afe, wellmaintained
and
attractive
public
spaces
have
a critical role
in creating
pride
in the
places
where
communities
live
which, in
turn, is
essential to
building
community
cohesion
and
successful communities
The
Government Response
to
the
Taylor Review
of Rural Economy
and
Affordable
Housing
(2009) (N: Taylor)
Response
to a
report
on
the
issues
that rural communities
face. O
utlines
the
Governments
principal policy
considerations
for the
countryside
as:
•
the
need
to
create
and
maintain
sustainable
communities
•
the
need
to
develop
ways
to
encourage
sustainable
economic
growth
in rural areas
•
the
need
to
encourage
an
increase
in the
supply
of housing
in the
long
term
, and
particularly
that of affordable
housing; and
•
the
need
to
plan
for economic
recovery, in
which
a streamlined
planning
system
will
be
a significant factor.
Accepted
recommendations
of the
Taylor Review
include:
•
the
need
for planning
policy
to
take
account of all three
strands
of sustainability
in a
balanced
way.
•
Recognition
that rural economies
have
an
important contribution
to m
ake
•
All types
of business
and
enterprise
can
be
appropriate
for rural areas, subject to
assessment of impact based
upon
local circumstances
•
Better support
for homebased
businesses, and
live/work
units
•
Local S
trategic
Partnerships
should
be
encouraged
to
develop
a long
term
vision
for their
community
which
includes
its
physical shape
and
sets
out plans
for
change
and
growth
in their
economic, environmental and
social context.
•
Agreement that affordable
rural housing
is a
priority
Child
Poverty
Act 2010
Places
a duty
on
the
Secretary
of S
tate
to meet four child
poverty
targets
by
2020/21, based
on
a relative
low
income
measure, a
low
income
measure
fixed
in real
term
s, a
combined
low
income
and
material deprivation
measure, and
a ‘persistent poverty’ m
easure
• Requires
the
UK
Government to
publish
a UK
child
poverty
strategy, which
must be
revised
every
three
years, setting
out policies
to
meet the
targets
The
Integrated
Regional Framework
for the
North
East
(2007) (R1g)
Defines
Sustainable
communities
as
places
where
people
want to
live
and
work, now
and
in
the
future.
They
meet the
diverse
needs
of current and
future
residents, they
are
sensitive
to their
environment,
and
contribute
to a
high
quality
of life. T
hey
will
be
safe
and
inclusive,
well planned, well
designed, well built
and
run, and
offer equality
of
opportunity
and
good
access
to
services
for
all.
They
must have
adequate
provision
of
high
quality, affordable
housing, good
public
transport, schools,
hospitals, shops
and
a
clean, safe
environment
with
open
public
space
where
people
can
relax
and
interact.
The
IRF
further
recognises
that
communities
are
diverse
and
that it is
essential
that people
are
able
to
have
a say
on
the
way
their
neighbourhoods
are
planned
and
run
The
North
East of
England
Regional
Spatial Strategy
to
2021
(R2i)
Recognises
that
sustainable
communities
are
cohesive, m
ixed
and
socially
inclusive
with
a
sense
of place
and
identity
with
opportunities
for people
to
maximise
their
health
and
quality
of life.
Further states
that the
planning
system:
• has
a duty
to
deliver
the
spatial elements
of sustainable
communities
in a
way
Sustainable
Community
Strategy
– One
Darlington
Perfectly
Placed
(20082021) (L1f)
The
One
Darlington
priority
has
many
strands
which
the
LDF
can
contribute
to. These
include:
•
Tackling
deprivation
•
Nurturing
a strong, vibrant and
cohesive
boroughwide
community
of town, villages
and
countryside
•
Valuing
community
diversity
•
Social inclusion
•
Protection
of vulnerable
people
•
Encouraging
people
to participate
in their
community
Darlington
Children
and
Young
People’s
Plan
(20082011)
(L12b)
Priorities
relating
to
communities
include:
•
Make
sure
everyone
is safe
at home, at school,
outside,
on
the
streets
and
is not bullied
•
To
encourage
everyone
to
be
helpful to
friends, family
and
neighbours
and
contribute
to their
community
and
environment
•
Create
ways
for children, young
people
and
their
families
to
have
a say
in the
way
services
are
provided
Community
Safety
Plan
2008
– 2011
(L17)
Vision
for the
future
is that D
arlington
will
be:
•
An
even
safer and
more
tolerant place, with
less
victims
of crime
and
antisocial behaviour and
a place
where
life
can
be
enjoyed
free
from
the
fear of crime;
•
A place
where
offending
is not tolerated, the
harm
caused
by
illegal drugs
and
alcohol is
minimised
and
where
public
behaviour becomes
acceptable
to
all;
•
A Darlington
that enables
us
to
value
and
respect our
environment and
where
all areas
enjoy
the
same
levels
of safety
and
quality
of life
Darlington
Local Neighbourhood
Renewal Strategy
(L18)
The
aim
of this
Strategy
is to:
‘reduce
deprivation
in the
eleven
most disadvantaged
wards
within
the
Borough
and
improve
the
life
chances
of residents
living
within
these
areas’.
Strategic
priorities
include:
•
Reduce
worklessness
and
improve
training
opportunities
and
business
development within
the
priority
areas.
•
Build
cohesive
and
confident communities
raising
self
esteem
and
confidence.
•
Create
a m
ore
attractive
environment by
tackling
sustainability
issues
to
protect the
natural environment
and
liveability
issues
such
as
litter,
graffiti,
dog
fouling
that have
been
identified
by
the
community.
•
Develop
an
effective
transport
system.
•
Raise
educational standards
and
develop
an
ethos
of
lifelong
learning
by
providing
opportunities
for access,
achievement and
engagement
•
Engage
communities
and, in
particular,
young
people
in
leisure
activities
•
Reduce
crime
and
antisocial behaviour and
increase
the
In order to
create
sustainable
communities
the
MPAGDPD
should:
Ensure
the
community
are
involved
in consultation
regarding
the
location
of new
development sites
and
land
allocations
Consider how
the
location
of
new
development sites
and
allocations
will
contribute
to
creating
mixed
and
cohesive
communities
Aim
to
reduce
the
level of
deprivation
and
inequalities
in
the
borough
Ensure
adequate
provision
of
affordable
housing
(particularly
in
areas
of need),
public
transport, schools, hospitals,
shops, leisure
and
open
space
in
identified
locations.
Consider how
the
location
of
new
sites
and
land
allocations
will
support
the
lifestyles
and
meet the
needs
of young
people
and
an
ageing
population.
Enhance
community
safety.
(for example, is
the
location,
designation
or policy
likely
to
increase
road
traffic
accidents,)
Protects
and
enhance
the
countryside, and
ensure
the
location
of new
development
sites
and
land
allocations
also
does
so
(for example
will
the
location
of development and
land
allocation
deliver
affordable
housing, support
rural diversification
and/or take
productive
agricultural land
out
of use)?
Will
the
location
of new
development sites
and
allocations
help
to bring
back
into
use
buildings
of
importance
to the
local
community
and/or to
the
heritage
of the
Borough?
Should
take
account of the
Appraisal of identified
locations
and
allocations
to
consider
and
include:
Level of community
participation
generated
Community
cohesiveness
and
identity
Reducing
identified
inequalities
– heath,
education
etc
If
the
location
will
provide
affordable
housing
in areas
of
need
How
the
location
will
help
to
meet the
needs
of
older/younger people
–
will
it support
youth
facilities, local shops
etc
Community
safety
issues
–
improvements
required
to
pedestrian
crossings
etc
Their
impact on
rural
parts
of the
Borough
(communities,
landscape, heritage
and
economy)
Will
the
location
help
bring
back
into
use
community
facilities
or
locally
important
buildings
Include
criterion
or
maybe
even
objective
of increasing
the
quality
of existing
homes, especially
in
deprived
areas
Include
criterion
of
providing
leisure
facilities
for young
people, especially
in
deprived
areas
Include
criterion
of
improving
security
of
design, especially
in
high
impact areas
of
central D
arlington.
15
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
COMMUNITIES
National
Regional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
• Requires
Scottish
and
Northern
Irish
ministers
to
publish
child
poverty
strategies
(the
National A
ssembly
for Wales
has
enacted
separate
legislation
imposing
corresponding
duties
on
Ministers
in W
ales)
• Establishes
a Child
Poverty
Commission
to provide
advice
on
strategies
• Requires
the
UK
Government to
publish
annual progress
reports
• Places
duties
on
local authorities
and
other ‘delivery
partners’ in
England
to
work
together to
tackle
child
poverty, conduct a
local needs
assessment,
produce
a child
poverty
strategy
and
take
child
poverty
into
account in
the
production
and
revision
of their
Sustainable
Communities
Strategies
Localism
Bill (2010)
The
Bill
devolves
more
powers
to
councils
and
neighbourhoods
and
gives
local communities
greater control over local decisions
like
housing
and
planning.
The
Bill
contains
numerous
provisions
in relation
to Local G
overnment.
These
include
a general power of competence
for Local A
uthorities
("LAs"), governance
arrangements
for LAs
including
new
provisions
for directly
elected
mayors, the
abolition
of the
standards
board
regime
and
requirements
for LAs
to
set senior pay
policy
statements.
A key
element of the
Bill
is to
provide
for community
empowerm
ent with
powers
to
enable
people
to
instigate
local referendums
on
any
issue, to
approve
or veto
in a
referendum
a council tax
increase
deemed
to be
excessive, to
express
an
interest in
running
local authority
services
and
to provide
local community
groups
with
an
opportunity
to
bid
to
buy
assets
of community
value.
Reform
of the
Planning
system
is another key
element of the
Bill
with
provisions
to
abolish
regional strategies, provide
for neighbourhood
plans, m
ake
preapplication
consultation
compulsory, m
ake
changes
to
planning
enforcement and
in relation
to nationally
significant infrastructure.
The
Bill
contains
provisions
to
reform
social housing
including
measures
to
offer flexible
tenancies
for new
social tenants, create
a new
system
of council housing
finance, provide
assistance
for tenants
to
exchange
their
social rented
property, transfer the
functions
of the
Tenants
Services
Authority
to the
Homes
and
Communities
Agency
and
make
changes
to
the
system
for tenants
to m
ake
a complaint about their
social landlord.
that involves
and
actively
includes
the
people
it affects.
• needs
to
consider the
contribution
of both
the
locational
elements
of land
use
and
the
design
and
layout of development
in delivering
sustainable
communities
Sustainable
Communities
in the
North
East:
Building
for the
Future
(2003)
(R3)
Implements
the
national
sustainable
communities’ action
plan
at the
regional level.
Highlights
actions
to
address
housing,
planning
and
neighborhood
renewal
issues
and
further
outlines
the
need
to
create
sustainable
communities
which:
• are
economically
prosperous;
• have
decent homes
at
a price
people
can
afford;
• safeguard
the
countryside;
• enjoy
a welldesigned,
accessible
and
pleasant living
and
working
environment;
• are
effectively
and
fairly
governed
with
a
strong
sense
of
community
number of local people
feeling
safer within
their
community.
•
Encourage
healthier lifestyles
and
reduce
health
inequalities.
•
Engage
with
private
sector landlords
to
improve
standards
and
increase
the
proportion
of decent homes
within
the
private
sector occupied
by
vulnerable
groups
All
Together Now: A
Social Inclusion
Strategy
for
Darlington
(2005) (L19)
The
overarching
aim
of the
Social Inclusion
Strategy
is to
improve
the
life
chances
of those
at risk
of disadvantage
and
discrimination. T
ask
is to
reduce
social inequalities, renew
disadvantaged
neighbourhoods, protect the
vulnerable
and
ensure
equality
of access
for all members
of the
community
to
services
and
opportunities.
All
our Futures, A
Strategy
for Later Life
in Darlington
(20082011) (L:later)
Recognises
that there
are
35,000
people
currently
living
in Darlington
today
who
are
aged
50
or over
and
that this
figure
is set to
increase
to over 40,000
by
2021
(almost half
the
population)
As
a result
recognises
responsibility
to
address
the
increasing
role
of older people
in communities
and
to develop
policies
and
services
in order to
reflect the
changing
needs
of society.
Identifies
six
priority
areas
for improvement.
Those
that the
LDF
may
be
able
to influence
include:
•
Valuing
Older People
a
Darlington
with
opportunities
and
no
barriers
to
full participation
at all levels
in society,
where
older people
are
asked
their
opinion
on
the
services
that affect them
and
the
services
are
tailored
to
the
needs
•
Improving
Health
and
Wellbeing
Ensuring
older people
live
longer and
healthier lives, keeping
active
and
independent with
access
to
health
and
social care
services
when
needed
•
A Safe
Environment
Older people
want to
live
in a
safe
and
secure
environment,
which
enhances
quality
of life.
This
incorporates
personal safety, housing, transport,
community
safety
and
environment
•
Life
Long
Learning
Appropriate
provision
for older
people
to
engage
in different types
of learning
and
extend
their
knowledge
and
experience
of available
education
opportunities
in Darlington.
Darlington
Community
Safety
Partnership
Plan
201215
Priorities
are:
1. Reducing
the
harm
ful effects
of drugs
and
alcohol.
2. Tackling
antisocial behaviour.
3. Reducing
offending
and
reoffending.
4. W
orking
with
families
with
multiple
problems.
5. Supporting
vulnerable
people
(the
focus
here
is upon
addressing
domestic
abuse, sexual violence
and
hate
crime).
Identifies
High
Impact A
reasfour neighbourhoods
(the
town
centre/fringe, the
vicinity
of Northgate
and
the
inner parts
of
developing
Child
Poverty
Strategy
Be
able
to operate
alongside
potential N
eighbourhood
Plans
Increase
the
proportion
of
decent homes.
Enable
provision
of leisure
activities, especially
for young
people
and
in deprived
neighbourhoods.
Improve
building
energy
efficiency, community
facilities,
green
space
and
secure
design
in deprived
neighbourhoods
of the
borough
16
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
COMMUNITIES
National
Regional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
Bank
Top
and
North
Road
wards) which
account for 25%
of
reported
antisocial behaviour incidents
in the
borough
as
well
as
having
above
average
incidence
of the
other priority
issues.
Darlington
Putting
Children
FirstChild
Poverty
Strategy
(2011)
Child
poverty
is concentrated
in the
ten
wards
of central,
south
and
east D
arlington, N
orth
Road
and
Cockerton
West.
Actions
identified
include:
Plan
that childcare
provision
is affordable
and
accessible
across
the
Borough;
Enhance
people’s
skills
in relation
to the
job
market and
align
business
need
to Education
To
plan
for and
mitigate
the
effects
of welfare
reform
Promote
healthy
settings
for children
and
young
people
To
mitigate
the
effects
of fuel poverty
HEALTH
AND
RECREATION
International/
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
United
Nations
Convention
on
the
Rights
of the
Child
(Article
31)
(1989) (I4)
The
Convention
recognises
the
critical role
regular sport
and
physical play
in children’s
lives.
Particularly
for the
physical, mental,
psychological and
social
development of children
and
adolescents. Involvement in
sport
can
boost children’s
health, improve
academic
perform
ance
and
help
reduce
crime. A
t the
most
fundamental level,
sport
and
play
are
as
a child’s
right:
States
shall “recognise
the
right of
the
child
to rest and
leisure, to
engage
in play
and
recreational
activities
appropriate
to
the
age
of
the
child
and
to participate
freely
in
cultural life
and
the
arts."
Children’s
Environment and
Health
Action
Plan
for Europe
World
Health
Organisation
(2005)
(E16)
Recognises
that the
environment
can
have
a substantial impact on
the
health
of children
and
young
people.
They
can
be
particularly
vulnerable
to
the
harm
ful effects
of
environmental hazards
and
it is
important for them
to
grow
up
in a
clean
and
healthy
environment and
have
good
access
to
green
open
spaces.
European
Union
Sports
Charter
(2001) (E17)
Sets
out the
following;
Be
Active, Be
Healthy, A
plan
for getting
the
nation
moving
(2009) (N47)
Recognises
that physical activity
has
the
potential to
create
a
healthier,
happier and
wealthier nation. S
ets
an
ambition
for a
healthier,
fitter nation
by
2012
and
beyond. Identifies
that to
meet
this
ambition
a worldclass
delivery
infrastructure
for physical
activity
will
be
needed. T
he
LDF
will
have
a part
to
play
in creating
the
‘active’ environments
that will:
•
Motivate
recreational w
alking
and
cycling
through
the
provision
of safe, attractive
and
interesting
parks
or
streetscapes
•
Take
account of the
needs
of cyclists
and
pedestrians
through
good
urban
design
•
Provide
natural environments
that enhance
physical activity
and
promote
mental w
ellbeing.
Healthy
Weight,
Healthy
Lives. A
crossGovernment strategy
for England
(2008) (N: weight)
Sets
out ambition
to be
the
first m
ajor nation
to reverse
the
rising
tide
of obesity
and
overweight in
the
population
by
ensuring
that
everyone
is able
to
achieve
and
maintain
a healthy
weight.
Initial
focus
will
be
on
children: by
2020, aims
to
reduce
the
proportion
of
overweight and
obese
children
to 2000
levels.
The
LDF
can
contribute
to the
ambition
through
a range
of
supportive
policies
that include
but are
not limited
to:
•
Provision
and
renewal of play
areas
•
School playgrounds
designed
to
encourage
varied
and
active
play
•
Prioritise
developments
that address
the
need
for people
to
be
physically
active
as
part
of daily
life
•
Prioritise
modes
of transport
that involve
physical activity
when
developing
roads
•
Public
open
space
to be
accessible
by
foot or by
bicycle
•
Business, office
development to
be
linked
to walking
and
cycling
networks
Better Health,
Fairer Health: NHS
(2008) (R10)
Vision: T
he
North
East environment
will
be
the
most
conducive
to health
in
the
country,
maximising
its
natural resources
to
the
best advantage
of its
people, and
designing
its
economy, buildings,
spaces, transport
and
other
infrastructure
to
maximise
health
and
wellbeing
sustainably.
Relevant actions:
•
High
priority
to
be
given
to
developments
that increase
walking
and
cycling
The
Integrated
Regional
Framework
for the
North
East (2007)
(R1h)
With
the
North
East
recognised
as
the
unhealthiest region
in
England,
encouraging
Tees
Valley
Green
Infrastructure
Strategy
(2008)
(SR7b)
The
vision
of the
strategy
is to
develop
network
of
green
corridors
and
green
spaces
by
2021. Meeting
this
aim
will
help
to
influence
the
Tees
Valley
population’s
access
to
open
spaces
to
increase
participation
in
recreation
also
achieving
associated
mental
health
benefits.
Tees
Valley
Sport
Sub
Regional
Facilities
Strategy
(2009) (SRTV)
• Swimming
pool
supply
well above
national average
and
utilised
capacity
is lower
than
average
• M
any
pools
are
of
an
age/condition
that is
worse
than
the
national
average
• Sports
hall supply
is
in line
with
the
regional average
but there
are
Sustainable
Community
Strategy
– One
Darlington
Perfectly
Placed
(20082021) (L1g)
A healthy
Darlington
is one
of the
delivery
themes
of the
SCS. Under this
theme
aims
include:
•
Making
sure
that everyone
has
access
to
affordable
decent homes
•
Providing
attractive, accessible
and
safe
environments
in all neighbourhoods
that support
relaxation
and
physical activities
like
walking
and
cycling
•
Ensure
that everyone
across
the
borough
has
easy, affordable
access
to
health
facilities
and
to
all the
essential services
that contribute
to
health
and
wellbeing
Darlington
Borough
Council
– Corporate
Plan
20082012
(L3e)
Top
priorities
include:
Narrow
the
gaps
in life
expectancy
between
Darlington
and
England
as
a whole
and
within
Dalrlington
•
Improve
access
to
sport
and
leisure
•
Implement the
Darlington
Alcohol S
trategy
•
Plan
for an
ageing
population
•
Develop
parks/countryside
green
exercise
agenda
DBC
Sports
and
Physical Activity
Facilities
Strategy
(2009) (L: sport)
The
strategy
recommends
that:
•
The
current provision
of swimming
pools
and
heath
and
fitness
facilities
is protected
•
Access
to
school facilities
is im
proved
•
Quality
of school facilities
are
improved
•
An
additional provision
of one
sports
hall is
required
•
Increase
use
of community
halls
etc
•
Development of indoor tennis
provision
•
A specialist gymnastics
facility
is provided
•
An
additional provision
of at least one
STP
•
Improvement of MUGA’s
in parks
•
Improvements
to
athletics
facilities
are
required
•
Facilities
to
accommodate
cycling
are
needed
•
Additional active
play
facilities
such
as
skate
parks
and
bmx
tracks
are
needed
DBC
Playing
Pitch
Strategy
(2009) (L: Pitch)
Identifies:
Significant under supply
of junior football pitches
General poor quality
of pitches
Loss
of pitches
due
to
development whilst some
of these
have
been
replaced
elsewhere, they
are
of
The
MPAGDPD
can
improve
health
and
recreation
in the
Borough
by:
Ensuring
polices,
designations
and
new
development sites
incorporate
and
protect
existing
open
space, cycle
and
walking
routes.
MPAGDPD
to allocate
open
space
in areas
of need
in
the
Borough
Locations
of new
development sites
to
promote
walking
and
cycling
activity
Ensure
new
development
sites
identified
have
adequate
provision
of
community
facilities
for
providing
social support
(effect on
mental w
ellbeing)
Ensure
location
either have
or will
be
provided
with
adequate
provision
of play
areas.
Locations
to
provide
adequate
provision
to health
care
services
MPAGDPD
to allocate
additional community
facilities
where
needs
identified.
Appraisal of identified
locations
and
allocations
to
consider and
include:
Loss/creation
of open
space
Loss/creation
of sports
recreation
facilities
and
playing
pitches
Provision
of play
areas,
community
facilities
and
premises
of creative
businesses
and
organisations
in relation
to
location
of
development
(particularly
new
housing)
Ability
of location
to
encourage
walking
and
cycling
activity
Access
to
health
care
services
from
location
Capacity
of current
health
care
services
Effect of location
on
improving
health
and
wellbeing
in areas
of
health
inequality
Include
criterion
of
facilitating
improvement
of existing
green/space/sports/play
area
17
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
HEALTH
AND
RECREATION
International/
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
to
enable
every
individual to
participate
in sport
and
notably:
•
to ensure
that all young
people
should
have
the
opportunity
to
receive
physical education
instruction
and
the
opportunity
to
acquire
basic
sports
skills,
•
to ensure
that everyone
should
have
the
opportunity
to take
part
in sport
and
physical
recreation
in a
safe
and
healthy
environment,
and, in
co
operation
with
the
appropriate
sports
organisations:
•
to ensure
that everyone
with
the
interest and
ability
should
have
the
opportunity
to im
prove
their
standard
of perform
ance
in
sport
and
reach
levels
of
personal achievement and/or
publicly
recognised
levels
of
excellence.
Mental Health
Action
Plan
for
Europe: World
Health
Organisation
(2005) (E18)
Recognises
that m
ental health
and
wellbeing
are
fundamental to
quality
of life. M
ental health
is an
essential
component of social cohesion,
productivity
and
stability
in the
living
environment,
social capital and
economic
development in
societies.
The
plan
recognises
that the
physical environment can
have
a
positive
or negative
impact on
mental health.
Actions
relevant to
the
LDF
and
SA
include:
•
Improve
access
to
physical
activity
for older people.
•
Assess
the
potential impact on
the
mental w
ellbeing
of the
population
before
its
introduction
•
Promote
the
development of
community
centres
for older
people
to
increase
social
support
A Sporting
Future
for All
(2000) (N49)
The
Government has
high
aspirations
for sport. A
ims
include:
•
more
people
of all ages
and
all social groups
taking
part
in
sport; and
•
more
success
for our top
competitors
The
LDF
has
a part
to
play
in:
•
Improving
current sports
facilities
•
Developing
and
enhancing
infrastructure
such
as
sports
and
recreation
facilities, parks, playing
pitches
courts
and
MUGAs
Making
It Happen
(2002) (N53)
Health
strategies
and
strategies
for
regeneration
and
sustainable
development will
need
to be
mutually
reinforcing
and
should
address
the
significance
of m
ental health.
Time
for Play: Encouraging
Greater Play
Opportunities
for
Children
and
Young
People
(2006) (N54)
Recognises
that “things
to
do, places
to
go” are
vitally
important.
Play
facilities
will
help
keep
children
fit and
healthy, help
tackle
the
growing
issue
of obesity
and
provide
parents
with
places
where
they
are
happy
to
let their
children
spend
their
free
time.”
Planning
can
be
a tool for:
•
Protecting
and
enhancing
existing
playspace
and
associated
facilities
•
Identifying
needs
and
opportunities
for improvements
Green
Space, Better Places: Final Report
of the
Urban
Green
Spaces
Task
Force
(May
2002) (N55)
Identifies
that parks
and
green
spaces
are
a popular resource,
which
can
make
a valuable
contribution
to
the
attractiveness
of a
neighbourhood
and
to
the
health
and
well being
of local people.
LDF
policies
should:
•
promote
the
importance
of strategic
green
space
planning
in
developing
and
enhancing
networks
of urban
green
space
•
Protect urban
green
space
from
development,
where
local
schools, people
and
communities
need
them
•
Promote
planning
mechanisms
in particular section
106
agreements
to
deliver a
better mix
of green
spaces
healthier lifestyles
and
diets
is
important to
help
reduce
long
term
illness. S
port,
exercise
and
active
recreation
should
be
promoted, and
require
access
to
safe, green
and
open
spaces
for
activity, use
of active
design, and
access
to
the
natural
environment.
Access
to
high
quality
housing
is im
portant
for the
health
of the
region, and
these
factors
combine
to
improve
the
well
being
and
mental
health
of the
population.
NE
Regional
Facilities
Strategy
(2008) (R: Fac)
identifies
weaknesses
in
public
sector sport
provision, including:
• Shortfall of
swimming
pools
• Shortfall of
Synthetic
Turf
Pitches
• Ageing
facility
stock
(across
all
facility
types)
• Access
to
facilities,
particularly
on
education
sites
and
at peak
times
• Lack
of regionally
significant
facilities
(for some
sports)
some
access
issues
on
school/college
sites
• Low
provision
of
Synthetic
Turf
Pitches
and
health
and
fitness
gyms, high
number of indoor
bowls
rinks
poorer quality
Overall net loss
of pitches
Changing
facilities
are
severely
lacking
Proposes
hub
and
spoke
hierarchical approach
to pitch
provision.
Proposes
that loss
of a
playing
pitch
should
only
be
considered
under certain
conditions
and
criteria
Darlington
Play
and
Free
Time
Strategy
2007
– 2012
(L21)
Relevant priorities
include:
•
Access
for all
– all children
and
young
people
should
be
able
to access
quality
play
and
free
time
opportunities
and
should
not be
disadvantaged
by
where
they
live, their
cultural or socio
economic
background, their
disabilities
and
special needs, or their
age
•
Youth
provision
– Access
to
quality
play
and
free
time
opportunities
for all age
groups
from
0 to
18
years
is a
priority,
Darlington
Children
and
Young
People’s
Plan
(20082011) (L12c)
Priorities
relating
to
health
include:
•
Promote
healthy
eating
and
more
exercise
•
Improve
opportunities
for play
for all children
and
young
people
•
Improve
school buildings
and
play
grounds
Darlington
Open
Space
Strategy
(20072012) (L5b)
Aims
to
provide, protect and
enhance
a variety
of high
quality, accessible
open
and
green
spaces
throughout the
Borough, linking
with
the
cultural and
natural heritage
of the
area
that are:
• Well designed
and
maintained
• Sustainable
• Safe
• Promote
health, w
ell being
and
enjoyment,
improving
the
quality
of life
for residents
and
visitors
to
the
Borough
Issues
to
be
addressed
by
the
strategy
that have
a bearing
on
health
include:
• Poor level of provision
in several parts
of the
town, often
coinciding
with
the
areas
of greatest need,
in term
s of lack
of private
open
space, poor health
and
low
mobility
• Poor quality
across, particularly, seminatural and
natural green
spaces
and
inform
al recreation
sites.
• The
impact that public
access
or otherwise
to
school playing
fields
can
have
on
the
overall level of
accessible
open
space
• Lost opportunities
for open
space
provision
and
enhancement in
association
with
new
development
• The
evolving
open
space
needs
of an
ageing
population
Darlington
Rights
of Way
Improvement Plan
(L22)
Identifies
that access
to
good
quality
countryside
is im
portant for mental and
physical health
as
it
provides
opportunities
for safe
outdoor recreation
and
exercise, for relaxation
and
escape
from
the
stresses
of urban
life. O
bjectives
relevant to
the
LDF
include:
• Provide
muchimproved
access
for all people, to
semi natural areas
and
the
countryside.
• The
need
for good
quality, accessible
routes
near to
where
people
live
• Better access
across
physical barriers, especially
the
road
network, but also
on
the
ROW
network
itself.
Darlington’s
Alcohol Harm
Reduction
Strategy
20082011
Targets
include
reducing
alcohol related
crime
and
disorder by
working
with
partners
to
manage
the
Town
Centre
effectively.
An
Allotments
Strategy
for Darlington
Allotment provision
is focussed
in the
less
densely
populated
parts
of the
borough, especially
the
south
west.
Actions
include:
Identify
further opportunities
for land
allocation
for new
allotm
ents
through
negotiations
with
developers.
Include
a clause
on
allotm
ents
to
protect and
enhance
current and
future
provision
within
the
Local
MPAGDPD
to ensure
policies, designations
and
locations
of development
protect sport
and
recreation
facilities
including
playing
pitches
MPAGDPD
to allocate
sports
and
recreational
facilities
and
playing
pitches
to
address
current
deficiencies
Engage
Drug
and
Alcohol
Treatm
ent T
eam
in
consultation
on
document
Facilitate
improvement of
existing
accessible
green
space
and
sports
facilities
Facilitate
construction
of
new
accessible
green
space
and
sports
and
play
facilities
MGP
DPD
to allocate
new
allotm
ent sites, especially
in
areas
of underprovision.
Protect and
enhance
allotm
ent provision.
Provide
incubator
accommodation
for creative
businesses.
Provide
an
arts
hub.
18
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
HEALTH
AND
RECREATION
International/
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
Development F
ramework.
Creative
Darlington: Investing
in a
Creative
Community
Three
key
requirements
identified:
• Arts
hub
(a
single
building
or closely
colocated
facilities)
• C
hildren
and
young
peoples’ theatre
• Strategic
function
Actions
include:
• Public
Art
– im
plement schemes
at Parkside
development and
at D
enes
entrances
• W
ork
with
Turning
Point N
orth
East to
develop
visual arts
practice, development and
partnerships
in
the
north
east,
linking
to the
national T
urning
Point N
etwork
• D
evelop
a strategic
approach
to encouraging
and
growing
creative
businesses
within
wider
regeneration
strategy
• Investigate
opportunities
for providing
incubator accommodation
for creative
businesses
and
artists’
workspaces, linked
if appropriate
to proposals
for future
arts
venues
• Identify
and
respond
to the
creative
or business
skills
training
needs
of people
working
in or seeking
to
establish
creative
businesses
• R
eview
and
carry
forward
strategy
on
public
art
within
wider regeneration
and
environmental
programmes
• Promote
the
value
of the
arts
within
wider regeneration
programmes
in their
contribution
to quality
of
life, attracting
investm
ent,
retaining
talented
and
enterprising
people
and
as
engagement channel
HERITAGE
AND
LAND/TOWN
SCAPE
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
The
European
Landscape
Convention
(2000) (E20)
Encourages
public
authorities
to
adopt policies
and
measures
at local,
regional,
national and
international
level for
protecting,
managing
and
planning
landscapes
throughout
Europe. It
covers
all
landscapes,
both
outstanding
and
ordinary,
that determ
ine
the
quality
of
people’s
living
environment.
It
introduced
the
concept of
"landscape
Planning
(Listed
Buildings
and
Conservation
Areas) Act (1990) (N56)
Buildings
which
are
listed
or which
lie
within
a conservation
area
are
protected
by
law
under
this
Act.
Prior consent is
required
for the
following:
• All works
affecting
a scheduled
monument or the
ground
surrounding
it require
scheduled
monument consent
• The
demolition
or alteration
of a
listed
building
and
historic
structures
within
its
grounds
requires
listed
building
consent
• The
demolition
of an
unlisted
building
in a
conservation
area
requires
conservation
area
consent
• Alterations
to
the
exterior of all buildings
may
also
require
planning
perm
ission
and
an
application
may
be
needed
for some
works
to
houses
in conservation
areas
Ancient Monuments
and
Archaeological Areas
Act (1979) (N57) Section
61(12) defines
sites
that w
arrant protection
due
to their
being
of national importance
as
'ancient m
onuments'.
These
can
be
either Scheduled
Ancient M
onuments
or "any
other monument which
in the
opinion
of the
Secretary
of S
tate
is of public
interest by
reason
of the
historic, architectural,
traditional,
artistic
or archaeological interest attaching
to it".
Damage
to an
ancient m
onument
is a
criminal offence
and
any
works
taking
place
within
one
require
Scheduled
Monument
Consent from
the
Secretary
of S
tate.
White
Paper Heritage
Protection
for the
21st Century
(2007) (N62)
Reflects
the
importance
of the
heritage
protection
system
in preserving
heritage
for people
to
enjoy
now
and
in
the
future
(central to
delivering
sustainable
communities).
The
proposals
are
based
around
core
principles:
• Developing
a unified
approach
to the
historic
environment;
• Supporting
sustainable
communities
by
putting
the
historic
environment at the
heart
of an
effective
planning
system.
• Provide
the
community
with
a sense
of character,
distinctiveness
and
identity
and
makes
it
somewhere
where
people
want to
live.
The
Integrated
Regional Framework
for the
North
East (2007) (R1h)
Promoting, enhancing
and
respecting
the
region’s
culture
and
heritage
is one
of the
objectives
of the
IRF. It is
recognised
that the
historic
environment
is irreplaceable
The
North
East of England
Regional Spatial
Strategy
to
2021
(R2j)
In
relation
to landscape
character the
RSS
recommends
policies
should:
• have
regard
to
landscape
character
assessments
• promote
integrated
management initiatives
to
sustain
nationally, regionally
and
locally
valued
landscapes,
• recognise
the
role
that characterbased
planning
tools
such
as
Town
Design
Statements, V
illage
Design
Statements, C
ountryside
Design
Summaries
and
Concept S
tatements
can
play
in
promoting
high
quality
development that
respects
local character and
distinctiveness;
• Incorporate
the
findings
of C
atchment Flood
Management P
lans.
In regards
to
the
historic
environment the
LDF
should:
• clearly
identify
and
assess
the
significance
of
any
heritage
assets
and
their
vulnerability
to
change
• encourage
the
refurbishment and
reuse
of
appropriate
disused
or underused
buildings
and
Natural England
Tees
Lowlands
Landscape
Character
Assessment (1994) (SR1)
Most of D
arlington
borough
sits
within
the
Tees
Lowlands.
Recommendations
made
within
this
report
in relation
to
the
entirety
of the
Tees
Lowland
area
include:
• Conservation
and
management of existing
field
boundaries
• Restoration
and
management of both
built
and
natural
features
within
historic
parklands
and
estate
landscapes
• W
oodland
planting
• Countryside
gateway
sites
and
recreational access
development
• Enhancement of degraded
river and
stream
corridors
• Recreation
of damaged
landscapes
associated
with
intrusive
infrastructure
Development should
respect the
character and
distinctiveness
of the
local landscape
Natural England
Durham
Magnesian
Limestone
Plateau
Landscape
Character Assessment (1994) (SR2)
A small part
of Darlington
borough
is in
this
national
character area. Recommendations
made
within
this
report
in
relation
to
the
entirety
of the
Durham
Magnesian
Limestone
Plateau
area
include:
• M
anagement of woodland
on
the
limestone
escarpment,
and
creation
of new
broadleaved
woodland
around
urban
settlements
and
transport
corridors.
• The
conservation
and
management of existing
field
boundaries, particularly
older hedgerows, including
creating
broader uncultivated
field
margins
and
the
planting
of hedgerows.
• Consider the
restoration
of limestone
quarries
to
limestone
Sustainable
Community
Strategy
– One
Darlington
Perfectly
Placed
(20082021)
(L1h)
Cultural issues
are
addressed
in
the
Aspiring
Darlington
delivery
theme. P
riority
to:
•
Expand
the
existing
range
of
arts
and
cultural businesses
and
services
primarily
through
the
Central P
ark
and
Town
Centre
Fringe
projects
Land/Townscape
issues
are
addresses
in the
Greener
Darlington
delivery
theme. P
riority
to:
•
Maintain
and
enhance
the
attractive
character and
ambience
of the
town
centre
and
the
borough, and
make
sure
that new
development
is welldesigned
and
complements
Darlington’s
character
Darlington
Borough
Council
Conservation
Area
Character
Appraisals
(L24)
Conservation
Area
designation
is
the
main
instrument available
to local
authorities
to
give
effect to
Need
to
consider the
impact of
designations, policies, new
development sites
and
allocations
on
landscape
character.
Locations
for
development m
ust relate
well
to the
geography
and
history
of land
and
sit well in
the
pattern
of existing
development.
In determ
ining
the
location
of
new
development sites
and
land
allocations
regard
to
available
landscape
and
historic
character
assessments
must be
taken.
The
location
of new
development sites
and
allocations
must ensure
that
they
will
not cause
a
detrimental affect on
listed
buildings, conservation
areas,
ancient m
onuments
and
archaeological areas.
Archaeological surveys
may
be
required
In determ
ining
the
locations
of
new
development sites
and
land
allocations
consider the
Appraisal of
identified
locations
and
allocations
to
consider:
The
ability
of the
identified
locations
to
protect and
enhance
heritage
and
landscape
value
The
potential for
the
location
to help
improve
access
to
and
understanding
of heritage
and
historic
assets
Include
criterion
of
responding
to
consultation
responses,
particularly
on
landscape
Include
criterion
of
protecting
ancient
woodland
Follow
recommendations
of Landscape
Character
19
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
HERITAGE
AND
LAND/TOWN
SCAPE
European
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
quality
objectives"
into
the
protection,
management
and
planning
of geographical
areas
whereby:
Every
planning
action
or
project should
improve
landscape
quality, or at
least not bring
about a
decline. T
he
effects
of
projects,
whatever their
scale, on
landscape
should
therefore
be
evaluated
and
rules
relating
to
those
effects
defined. E
ach
planning
action
or
project should
not only
match, but
also
be
appropriate
to
the
features
of
the
places.
• Provide
the
starting
point for imaginative
and
successful urban
and
rural regeneration.
• provides
a focal point for engaging
communities
in decisions
about preservation
and
development.
Building
a Sense
of Local Belonging
(2009) (N:belong)
Identifies
that a
sense
of belonging
to
the
immediate
neighbourhood
is a
key
indicator of community
cohesion. Recognises
that people
may
connect to
a place
through
its
buildings, particular landmarks, natural features,
parks
or other symbols
and
that events
such
as
celebrations, festivals, carnivals
and
public
art
can
contribute
to building
a sense
of belonging.
Building
in context:
new
development in
historic
areas
(N:context)
States
that conservation
areas
and
other sensitive
sites
are
not being
well served
by
the
development w
hich
is taking
place
within
them. Identifies
that successful projects
will:
• Relate
well to
the
geography
and
history
of the
place
and
the
lie
of the
land
• Sit
happily
in the
pattern
of existing
development
• Respect important views
• Respect the
sacle
of neighbouring
buildings
• Use
materials
and
building
methods
which
are
as
high
in quality
as
those
used
in the
existing
building
• Create
new
views
All
Landscapes
Matter,
Natural England
Position
Statement (2010) (N:Land)
Policies
include:
• All landscapes
matter.
They
should
be
managed, planned
and
protected
to be
distinctive
and
highly
valued
and
provide
a range
of ecosystem
services.
• need
to
plan
and
manage
this
change
to
ensure
that all landscapes
in the
future
respond
to
society’s
changing
needs
and
values
whilst retaining
diversity
and
distinctiveness.
• The
intent and
measures
of the
European
Landscape
Convention
should
be
integrated
more
comprehensively
into
national,
regional and
local strategies, policies, processes
and
actions
which
affect E
ngland’s
landscapes
and
their
enjoyment and
understanding
by
the
public.
• How
and
why
society
values
landscape
needs
to
be
better captured, translated
and
fully
represented
in decisionm
aking.
• Positive
benefits
through
landscape
enhancement should
be
sought through
the
design
of
development and
infrastructure.
Court
of Appeal Decision
[2011] EWCA
Civ
334
R(SAVE
Britain's
Heritage) v
Secretary
of State
Quashes points
ad
of the
Demolition
Order 1995: Planning
perm
ission
now
required
for demolition
of nonresidential buildings, and
of residential buildings
where
there
would
be
a significant effect on
the
environment.
incorporating
them
into
regeneration
schemes;
• seek
to
preserve, in
situ, archaeological sites
of
national importance
and, where
appropriate,
other archaeological remains
of regional and
local importance;
• recognise
the
opportunities
for heritage
led
regeneration
to
be
used
in a
constructive
way
• consider preparing, and
regularly
maintaining,
lists
of locally
important buildings
for their
areas,
and
set out policies
in LDFs, w
hich
seek, as
far
as
possible, their
protection
against
inappropriate
change.
North
East Strategy
for the
Environment (2008)
(R:es6)
Objectives
to:
protect and
enhance
the
region’s
historic
environments
and
heritage
assets
and
ensure
that
their
worth
is recognised
and
invested
in, enhancing
their
benefits
to
society.
Protect and
enhance
the
region’s
landscapes,
ensuring
they
are
recognised
for the
vital
contribution
they
make
to sense
of place
in
attracting
and
retaining
investm
ent,
talent and
tourism.
Natural England, Countryside
Character
Volume
1: North
East (R:CCV)
•
Recognises
that the
countryside
is a
priceless
national asset that is
fundamental to
our
identity
•
Recognises
that understanding
in relation
to
what contributes
to
the
character of the
countryside
is required, and
what m
ay
influence
it in
the
future
Encourages
everyone
to
respect the
character of
the
countryside
and
take
account of what m
ay
affect it in
decision
making
grasslands
and
their
associated
habitats, the
consolidation
and
extension
of existing
seminatural features, and
the
conservation
of important geological exposures.
Natural England
Durham
Coalfield
Pennine
Fringe
Landscape
Character Assessment (1994) (SR3)
A small part
of Darlington
borough
is in
this
national
character area. Recommendations
made
within
this
report
in
relation
to
the
entirety
of the
Durham
Coalfield
Pennine
Fringe
area
include:
• The
conservation
and
management of traditional
landscape
features, including
dry
stone
walls, hedges,
hedgerow
trees, seminatural w
oodlands, m
oorland
and
wetlands.
• The
conservation
of historic
landscapes
and
historic
landscape
features, including
parklands, green
villages
and
industrial artefacts
and
landmarks.
• In
agricultural areas, the
planting
of hedges,
woodlands
and
the
incorporation
of other habitats, where
appropriate.
• Coniferous
woodlands, when
they
reach
maturity
and
are
felled, w
ould
benefit from
restructuring, to
include
the
introduction
of native
broadleaved
species
and
a m
ore
diverse
age
structure.
Limestone
Landscapes
Historic
Environment Audit
and
Action
Plan
(2009)
Assesses
the
historic
environment of the
Durham
Magnesian
Limestone
Plateau.
Identitifies
two
sites
in Darlington
Borough
among
the
25
key
historic
assets
in the
area:
Shackleton
Beacon. Identifies
problem
of lack
of public
access
and
woodland
cover damaging
and
obscuring
the
remains
from
view. Identifies
potential for perm
issive
public
access
and
lowkey
interpretation
at the
site, and
proposes
a
detailed
site
survey
and
removal of trees
(to
be
substituted
by
planting
at the
base
of the
hill) and
stabilisation
of the
windmill
ruin.
Middridge/Shildon. P
roposes
to
incorporate
the
footpaths
around
Middridge
Grange
into
a circular heritage
walk
based
on
the
National R
ailw
ay
Museum, just across
the
borough
boundary. Also
to enhance
and
restore
historic
hedgerows
around
Middridge
Grange.
States
need
to produce
list of locally
important buildings
and
a
Conservation
Area
Character Appraisal and
Management
Plan
for Heighington
conservation
policies
for a
particular neighbourhood
or area.
The
LDF
will
need
to have
regard
to
the
conservation
area
character
appraisals
undertaken
for the
conservation
areas
at:
•
Coatham
Mundeville
•
Denton
•
Bishopton
•
Northgate
•
Victoria
Embankment
•
Cockerton
•
Piercebridge
•
Town
Centre
•
West E
nd
•
Middleton
One
Row
Darlington
Characterisation
Study
(2008)
L25)
Provides
analysis
of the
built
form
for each
part
of the
Borough, the
location, type
and
form
of
development,
identifying
key
characteristics
and
distinctive
features
to
be
reflected
in design.
As
a result
of the
study, 7
character zones
have
been
identified
as:
•
Town
centre
•
Town
centre
fringe
•
Inner suburban
•
Outer suburbs
•
Rural area
•
Employment zone
•
Transport
node
and
local
services
The
zones
are
based
on
their
distinctive
townscape, patterns
of
development,
approaches
to
detailing
or presence
of open
spaces
or modern
buildings
and
many
other components
that are
distinctive
to
the
zone.
potential of the
location
for
bringing
buildings
back
into
use.
Reflect locally
valued
aspects
of landscape
in policy, by
drawing
on
consultation
responses.
Designate
sites
of heritage
interest for particular themes
Designate
ancient w
oodland
Follow
recommendations
of
landscape
character
assessments
in preparing
policies
on
habitat creation.
Follow
recommendations
of
conservation
area
appraisals
when
designating
or allocating
sites
in or near those
areas.
Include
criteriabased
policy
on
demolitions
Appraisals
and
Conservation
Area
Character
Appraisals
when
assessing
sites
and
policies.
HOUSING
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
The
Housing
Act (2004) (N65)
Aims
to
help
protect the
most vulnerable
in
society
while
creating
a fairer housing
market for all those
who
own, rent or let
residential property. It
will
also
strengthen
The
North
East of England
Regional Spatial Strategy
to
2021
(R2k)
States
that delivering
sustainable
communities
Tees
Valley
Sub
Regional Housing
Strategy
(2007) (SR16)
Regards
Housing
Market Renewal as
fundamental to
the
wider economic
regeneration
of the
Tees
Valley. P
riorities
Sustainable
Community
Strategy
– One
Darlington
Perfectly
Placed
(20082021) (L1i)
Housing
issues
are
addressed
in the
Prosperous
Darlington
delivery
theme. P
riority
to
expand
the
stock
of affordable
housing,
making
sure
that future
housing
development m
eets
the
needs
of an
ageing
population, m
aking
all new
dwellings
carbon
neutral as
well as
enhancing
choice
across
the
housing
market.
Need
to
allocate
gypsy
and
traveller sites/pitches
to
meet identified
need
Allocate
housing
sites
to
Appraisal of housing
development sites
and
gypsy
and
traveller sites
to
consider:
20
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
HOUSING
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
the
Government's
drive
to meet its
2010
decent homes
target.
Further requires
LA’s
to
assess
the
accommodation
needs
of
Gypsies
and
Travellers
Planning
Policy
Statement 3: Housing
(2006) (N67)
Ensure
that everyone
has
the
opportunity
of living
in a
decent home, w
hich
they
can
afford, in
a community
where
they
want to
live.
•
Make
available
a wide
range
of
affordable
and
market housing
to
meet the
needs
of the
community
•
Create
a better balance
between
demand
and
supply
in every
housing
market and
to
improve
affordable
housing
•
Ensure
that m
ixed
communities
in all
areas
are
sustainable
and
within
easy
access
of services
•
Bring
into
residential use
empty
housing
and
buildings
Homes
for the
Future: More
Affordable,
More
Sustainable
(2007) (N69)
Vision
for:
Everyone
to
have
access
to
a decent
home
at a
price
they
can
afford, in
a place
where
they
want to
live
and
work. G
ood
quality, affordable
housing
enables
stable
and
secure
family
lives: w
e are
all
healthier,
happier and
wealthier when
we
have
decent homes
close
to schools,
healthcare
and
transport
links.
Sets
out our proposals
to
improve
the
housing
fabric
of our society
by
providing:
•
More
homes
to
meet growing
demand;
•
Welldesigned
and
greener homes,
linked
to good
schools, transport
and
healthcare;
•
More
affordable
homes
to
buy
or rent.
•
Target to
provide
3 million
new
homes
nationally
by
2020
with
2
million
by
2016
Strategic
Housing
Land
Availability
Assessment:
Identifying
appropriate
land
for housing
development (2007)
(N70)
A top
priority
for Government is
to
ensure
that land
availability
is not a
constraint on
the
delivery
of m
ore
homes. T
he
primary
role
of the
Strategic
Housing
Land
Availability
Assessment is
to:
•
identify
sites
with
potential for
housing;
•
assess
their
housing
potential;
and
•
assess
when
they
are
likely
to
be
developed
requires
high
quality
housing
and
living
environments
in
sustainable
locations
to
facilitate
and
support
accelerated
economic
growth.
Local D
evelopment F
rameworks
and
planning
proposals
should:
•
provide
for average
annual
net additions
to
the
dwelling
stock, by
district,
for the
financial years
20042021,
as
identified
below:
Darlington
•
2004/11
– 525
•
2011/16
– 340
•
2016/21
– 265
•
2004/21
– 395
70%
of new
homes
built
in Tees
Valley
should
be
prioritised
on
previously
developed
land
North
East England
Regional
Housing
Strategy: Quality
Places
for a
Dynamic
Region
(2007) (R12)
Sets
out 4
objectives:
•
to rejuvenate
the
housing
stock
including
the
provision
of high
quality
housing
for rent,
for sale
and
for shared
ownership
to
meet 21st C
entury
aspirations;
•
to ensure
the
supply, type
and
mix
of new
housing
for
rent and
for sale
meets
social and
economic
needs,
provides
choice
and
supports
growth.
•
to secure
the
improvement
and
maintenance
of
existing
housing
•
to promote
good
management and
targeted
housing
investm
ent to
address
specific
community
and
social needs
North
East Strategy
for the
Environment (2008) (R:es7)
Objective
to:
Raise
the
quality
of the
region’s
housing
and
its
surroundings
to
contribute
towards
the
creation
of sustainable
communities,
economic
development and
a
high
quality
environment.
include:
•
provision
of decent homes
•
supporting
vulnerable
members
of the
community
•
prevention
of homelessness
•
transform
ation
of failing
areas
into
truly
sustainable
communities
Tees
Valley
Strategic
Housing
Market
Assessment (2009) (SR17)
The
assessment identifies
the
following
in
relation
to
the
Tees
Valley
Housing
Market:
•
A strong
desire
(25%) for detached
houses
which
exceeds
the
proportion
of
the
dwelling
stock
(15%)
•
A preference
for terraced
housing
(19%)
is considerably
less
than
the
stock
(28%)
(As
a result there
will
need
to
be
a change
over time
in the
stock
balance
or a
shift in
the
image
of parts
of the
stock)
•
11%
of households
prefer a
flat w
hilst this
type
of dwelling
is 7%
of the
stock
so
there
is scope
for more
flats, but not at
the
high
proportions
in the
recent new
build
pipeline.
•
Strong
demand
for 2
rather than
3
bedroom
houses
(particularly
in
Darlington) and
a slight underprovision
of 4
bedroom
or larger.
However,
the
in
migrants
household
market is
more
strongly
oriented
to 3
or 4
bedroom
homes
•
Executive
housing
developments
in the
Tees
Valley
have
been
successful
•
Private
rented
sector plays
a major role
in
meeting
housing
need. H
owever,
there
are
issues
over quality
of the
stock
•
Estimation
that Darlington
should
contribute
626
affordable
homes
to the
Tees
Valley
requirement of 2244
over 5
years
•
Addressing
the
housing
market
requirements
of older people
is going
to
be
a challenge. (80%
would
want to
continue
to live
in their
current home)
•
The
need
for supported
accommodation
is
expected
to increase
in the
future.
Tees
Valley
Gypsy
and
Traveller
Accommodation
Need
Assessment
(TVGTA) (2009) (SR18)
LA’s
have
a requirement to
develop
and
implement
strategies
to
respond
to
the
accommodation
needs
of the
Gypsy
and
Traveller communities
living
in their
areas
as
part
of their
wider
housing
strategies. T
he
assessment identifies
that Darlington
will
need
to
locate
and
additional 98
pitches
between
2007
and
2026
Strategic
Housing
Land
Availability
Assessment (SHLAA) (2009) (L26)
Purpose
is to
identify
and
quantify
sources
of housing
land
supply
in the
Borough
for the
next fifteen
years
or so. A
shortfall in
meeting
the
RSS
housing
targets
have
been
identified
due
to
the
following
constraints:
•
willingness
of landowners
to
sell land
in current m
arket conditions
•
Willingness
of house
builders
to
build
in current m
arket conditions
•
Lack
of resolutions
to
sell Council owned
sites
•
Requirement to
remediate
contamination
on
several identified
urban
sites
However:
•
26
potential housing
sites
are
identified
as
suitable
for housing
development,
capable
of delivering
2602
dwellings
•
35
potential housing
sites
are
considered
available
for housing
development,
capable
of delivering
some
11,659
dwellings.
•
9 potential housing
sites
have
been
identified
as
being
capable
of delivering
649
dwellings
in the
period
20112016, with
a
further 8
sites
considered
capable
of delivering
709
dwellings
in the
period
20162021
and
2 sites
capable
of delivering
448
dwellings
in the
period
20212026.
Darlington
Housing
Strategy
(20082012) (L27)
Areas
of work
include:
•
Private
sector regeneration
(identifies
4 priority
wards
which
exhibit
higher levels
of nondecent housing)
•
Improvements
to
the
Council’s
stock
•
Meeting
the
needs
of older people
•
Supported
accommodation
•
Balancing
the
supply
and
demand
for social housing
•
Delivering
affordable
housing
accessible
to
all
•
More
sustainable
development –
commitment to
exploring
renewable
energy
sources
and
reviewing
new
build
specifications
Older Persons’ Housing
Strategy
(2007) (L28)
Identifies
that a
growing
older population
in Darlington
necessitates
consideration
of housing
and
support
needs, both
in the
near and
longer term
future. P
riorities
for action
in housing
and
support
for older people
have
been
grouped
under five
key
areas
•
Diversity
and
Choice: O
lder people
should
have
the
opportunity
to
be
able
to
exercise
choice
over where
they
live
and
the
services
they
receive.
•
Inform
ation
and
Advice: E
ffective
inform
ation
and
advice
about housing
options
and
the
type
of support
services
available
to
older people
empowers
them
to
make
inform
ed
choices
about their
futures; w
hether to
move
or remain
at home.
•
Flexible
Service
Provision: S
ervices
should
be
flexible
to
respond
to
the
changing
needs
of older people
•
Quality: T
he
provision
of a
good
quality
housing
and
related
service
is essential to
the
health
and
wellbring
of older people
•
Joint W
orking: Joined
up
working
between
all agencies
involved
in the
housing, care
and
support
of older people
is
essential to
achieving
successful outcomes
in policy
development.
Private
Sector Housing
Renewal Strategy
(2008) (L29)
The
Private
Sector Housing
Strategy
sets
out how
the
Council aims
to tackle
housing
conditions
within
the
private
sector in
line
with
current legislation. T
his
includes
rented
and
owneroccupied
properties, in
order to
improve
the
lives
of our most vulnerable
residents, including
older people.
Darlington
Homelessness
Strategy
201015
(L30)
Objectives
include:
• Ensure
appropriate
accommodation
and
support
is secured
and
available
for the
statutorily
homeless.
(includes
the
availability
of good
quality
private
sector rented
flats, houses; hostels; specific
accommodation
for those
with
mental
health
problems)
• Increase
the
supply
of affordable
housing
and
maximise
the
use
of existing
resources.
Darlington
Local Housing
Assessment (2005) (L31)
Identifies
a need
for affordable
housing
for general needs
and
older person
housing. A
n acute
need
has
been
identified
in rural
areas, a
high
need
in the
Main
Area
and
a m
oderate
need
in the
Central and
South
East part
of D
arlington
Borough
Darlington
Local Housing
Assessment (2005) (L31)
Identifies
a need
for affordable
housing
for general needs
and
older person
housing. A
n acute
need
has
been
identified
in rural
areas, a
high
need
in the
Main
Area
and
a m
oderate
need
in the
Central and
South
East part
of D
arlington
Borough
Darlington
Urban
Capacity
Study
(2004) (L32)
Provides
a snapshot of the
estimated
potential capacity
for new
housing
within
the
main
urban
area
of D
arlington
and
the
Borough’s
larger serviced
villages.
meet demand
in term
s of
overall numbers
and
type
and
mix
of housing
required
(affordable, single
storey,
family
homes
etc)
Location
of housing
sites
to
be
well located
to services
and
public
transport
links
and
to
consider capacity
of
services, local schools
etc
Location
of housing
sites
to
be
prioritised
on
previously
developed
land
where
available
Increase
the
supply
of
affordable
housing
Encourage
the
provision
of
hostels
in sustainable
locations, and
of private
homes
suitable
for older
people.
Ensure
policies
meet the
strong
need
to remedy
deficiencies
in the
existing
housing
stock, especially
in
the
private
rented
sector.
Ensure
policies
prioritise
homes
in sustainable
locations
Facilitate
the
large
scale
regeneration
of council
houses.
Location
in relation
to
shops, schools, health
care, employment sites
and
community
facilities.
Location
in relation
to
walking, cycling
and
public
transport
links
Ability
to strengthen
existing
communities
and/or contribute
to
housing
or general
regeneration
schemes
Ability
to deliver
housing/pitches
to
meet
identified
needs
in the
Borough
– for example
affordable
housing
Where
location
will
be
on
brownfield
sites
Flood
risk
Include
criterion
of
providing
affordable
housing
Include
criterion
of
enabling
independent
living
for older people
Include
criterion
or even
objective
of increasing
the
quality
of existing
housing
21
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
HOUSING
National
Regional
Cityregional
Local
Key
implications
for
the
MPAGDPD
Key
implications
for the
SA
Housing
capacity
of 2211
dwellings
has
been
identified
by
the
study
in
the
main
built
up
area
of Darlington
and
its
main
serviced
villages
Darlington
Housing
Strategy
and
Action
Plan
201217
Includes
the
objectives:
Work
with
residential developers
and
landowners
to
increase
the
number of houses
Work
in partnership
with
Registered
Providers
to
increase
the
number of affordable
houses
Increase
the
number of council houses
Increase
the
number of pitches for gypsies and
travellers
Continue
to effectively
manage
the
council‟
s retained
stock
Implement the
Asset Management Strategy
Work
in partnership
to deliver energy efficiency measures as part
of the
Green
Deal from
2013.
Ensure
new
housing
meets
sustainable
building
standards as set out in
the
Local P
lan
to be
resilient to
clim
ate
change
Increase
the
number of accredited
landlords.
Increase
the
number of houses in
multiple
occupation
which
are
free
from
Category
1 Hazards.
Reduce
the
number of nondecent homes.
Reduce
the
number of empty
homes
Agree
and
implement a
revised
master plan
for Central P
ark.
Implement the
remodelling
plans for Cockerton.
Prepare
and
agree
plans to
regenerate
Red
Hall Estate.
Prepare
a town
centre
fringe
area
master plan.
Sources
International/European
World
Summit
on
Sustainable
Development (2002) http://www.un.org/jsummit/htm
l/basic_info/basicinfo.htm
l United
Nations
Framework
Convention
on
Clim
ate
Change
(1992)
The
Kyoto
Protocol (2005) http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf,
http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php
UN
Convention
on
Biological D
iversity
(1992) http://www.cbd.int/
United
Nations
Convention
on
the
Rights
of the
Child
(Article
31) (1989) http://www.unicef.org/crc/
EU
Council Directive
01/42EC
Strategic
Environmental A
ssessment D
irective
(2001) http://www.environ.ie/en/Publications/Environment/Miscellaneous/FileDownLoad,1805,en.pdf
EU
Council Directive
08/50/EC
Air
Quality
Directive
(2008) http://www.defra.gov.uk/ENVIRONMENT/airquality/euint/eudirectives/airqualdirectives/
EU
Council Directive
00/60/EC
Water Framework
Directive
(2000) http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/waterframework/index_en.htm
l EU
Council Directive
80/68/EC
Groundwater Directive
(1980) http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:372:0019:0031:EN:PDF.
EU
Council Directive
02/49/EC
Environmental N
oise
Directive
(2002) http://ec.europa.eu/environment/noise/home.htm
EU
Council Directive
92/42/EC
Habitats
Directive
(1992) http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:1992L0043:20070101:EN:PDF
EU
Council Directive
97/49/EC
Birds
Directive
(1997) http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31997L0049:EN:HTML
EU
Council Directive
99/31/EC
Landfill Directive
(1999) http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/waste/topics/landfilldir/
A Sustainable
Europe
for a
Better World: A
European
Union
Strategy
for Sustainable
Development (2001) http://ec.europa.eu/sustainable/sds2001/index_en.htm
Soil Thematic
Strategy
(2006) http://ec.europa.eu/environment/soil/three_en.htm
Lisbon
Strategy: T
owards
a Europe
of Innovation
and
Knowledge
(2000) http://eurlex.europa.eu/en/dossier/dossier_13.htm
Strategic
framework
for European
cooperation
in education
and
training
(2009) http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelonglearningpolicy/doc28_en.htm
White
Paper:
European
Transport
Policy
for 2010: T
ime
to decide
(2001) http://ec.europa.eu/transport/strategies/2001_white_paper_en.htm
Children’s
Environment and
Health
Action
Plan
for Europe
World
Health
Organisation
(2005)
European
Union
Sports
Charter (2001) http://www.etib.lt/?s=activities&ss=sport&lang=en
The
European
Landscape
Convention
(2000) http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/Conventions/Landscape/
The
Clim
ate
Action
and
Renewable
Energy
Package
(2009) http://ec.europa.eu/environment/clim
at/clim
ate_action.htm
National
Ancient Monuments
and
Archaeological A
reas
Act (1979) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1979/46
Wildlife
and
Countryside
Act 1981
(as
amended) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/69
Planning
(Listed
Buildings
and
Conservation
Areas) Act (1990) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/9/contents
Planning
Policy
Guidance
17: P
lanning
for Open
Space, S
port
and
Recreation
(1991) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/planningpolicyguidance17
22
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Planning
Policy
Guidance
24: P
lanning
and
Noise
(1994) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/ppg24
Planning
Policy
Guidance
16: A
rchaeology
and
Planning
(1999) http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/156777.pdf
A Sporting
Future
for All (2000) http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/sportfutureforall.pdf
The
Countryside
and
Rights
of W
ay
Act 2000
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/37/contents
National and
Regional G
uidelines
for Aggregates
Provision
200120
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/letteraggregatesprovision.pdf
Planning
Policy
Guidance
13: T
ransport
(2001) (As
amended
by
PPS3, Housing
2006, and
amendment of 2010) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/ppg13
National S
ervice
Framework
for Older People
(Department of H
ealth) (2001) http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4003066
Planning
Policy
Guidance
8: T
elecommunications
(2001) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/ppg8
Making
It HappenA
Guide
to Delivering
Mental H
ealth
Promotion
(2001)
http://www.publications.doh.gov.uk/pdfs/makingithappen.pdf
Green
Space, B
etter Places: F
inal R
eport
of the
Urban
Green
Spaces
Task
Force
(2002) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/communities/greenspacesbetter3
Building
in context:
new
development in
historic
areas
(2002) http://www.cabe.org.uk/publications/buildingincontext
Working
with
the
Grain
of Nature: A
biodiversity
strategy
for England
(2002) http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/biodiversity/documents/biostrategy.pdf
The
Water Act (2003) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/37/contents
Planning
Policy
Statement 7: S
ustainable
Development in
Rural A
reas
(2004) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/pps7
Planning
Policy
Statement 23: P
lanning
and
Pollution
Control (2004) http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/planningpolicystatement23.pdf
Planning
Policy
Statement 22: Renewable
Energy
(2004) http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/147444.pdf
The
Future
of T
ransport: A
Network
for 2030
(2004) http://www.thepep.org/ClearingHouse/docfiles/The.Future.of.Transport.pdf
Safer Places: T
he
Planning
System
& Crime
Prevention
(2004) The
Housing
Act (2004) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/saferplaces
Every
Child
Matters: Change
for Children
(2004) http://www.infed.org/archives/gov_uk/every_child_matters.htm
Planning
Policy
Statement 1: Delivering
Sustainable
Development (2005) http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/planningpolicystatement1.pdf
Securing
the
Future: UK
Government Sustainable
Development S
trategy
(2005) http://www.defra.gov.uk/sustainable/government/publications/ukstrategy/
Planning
Policy
Statement 9: B
iodiversity
and
Geological C
onservation
(2005) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/pps9
Planning
Policy
Statement 10: P
lanning
for Sustainable
Waste
Management (2005) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/planningpolicystatement10
Strategy
for flood
and
coastal erosion
risk
management in
England
(2005) http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/flooding/documents/policy/strategy/strategyresponse1.pdf
Clim
ate
Change: T
he
UK
Programme
(2006) http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/change_energy/tackling_clim
a/programme/programme.aspx
Planning
Policy
Statement 25: Development and
Flood
Risk
(2006) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/pps25floodrisk
Stern
Review: The
Economics
of C
limate
Change
(2006) http://www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/sternreview_index.htm
Natural E
nvironment and
Rural C
ommunities
Act (2006) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/16/contents
Planning
Policy
Statement:
Planning
and
Clim
ate
Change
(Supplement to
PPS
1)(2006) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/ppsclim
atechange
Time
for Play: E
ncouraging
Greater Play
Opportunities
for Children
and
Young
People
(2006) http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.culture.gov.uk/reference_library/publications/3567.aspx
Minerals
Planning
Statement 1: P
lanning
and
Minerals
(2006) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/mineralspolicystatement5
Strong
and
Prosperous
Communities: T
he
Local G
overnment W
hite
Paper (2006) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/localgovernment/strongprosperous
Planning
Policy
Statement 3: Housing
(2006) (reissued
2010.)
http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/pps3housing
Living
Places: Cleaner,
Safer,
Greener (2006) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/communities/livingplacescleaner
Homes
for the
Future: More
Affordable, More
Sustainable
(2007) http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/housing/pdf/439986.pdf
White
Paper Heritage
Protection
for the
21st Century
(2007) http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.culture.gov.uk/reference_library/consultations/1156.aspx
Strategic
Housing
Land
Availability
Assessment:
Identifying
appropriate
land
for housing
development (2007) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/landavailabilityassessment
English
Indices
of D
eprivation
(2007) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/communities/indiciesdeprivation07
(DCSF) The
Childrens
Plan: B
uilding
Brighter Futures
(2007) http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/childrensplan/downloads/The_Childrens_Plan.pdf
Meeting
the
Energy
Challenge: A
White
Paper on
Energy
(2007) http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39387.pdf
Building
a Greener Future: policy
statement (2007) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/buildingagreener
The
Air
Quality
Strategy
for England, Scotland, W
ales
and
Northern
Ireland
(2007) http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/air/airquality/strategy/index.htm
Waste
Strategy
for England
(2007) http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/waste/strategy/
Future
Water:
The
Government’s
Water Strategy
for England
(2008) http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/water/strategy/pdf/futurewater.pdf
Planning
and
Compulsory
Purchase
Act (2008) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/29/contents
State
of the
Natural E
nvironment 2008
http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/publications/sone/default.aspx
Strategy
for Sustainable
Construction
(2008) http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file46535.pdf
Planning
Policy
Statement 12: Local S
patial P
lanning
(2008) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/pps12lsp
The
Code
for Sustainable
Homes: S
etting
the
standard
in sustainability
for new
homes
(2008) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/codesustainabilitystandards
Clim
ate
Change
Act (2008) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/contents
England
Biodiversity
Strategy: Clim
ate
Change
Adaptation
Principles
(2008) http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/biodiversity/documents/ebsccap.pdf
Delivering
a Sustainable
Transport
System
2008
https://www.liftshare.com/business/pdfs/Dft%20%
20Delivering%20a%20Sustainable%20Transport%20System%20%
202008.pdf
Healthy
Weight,
Healthy
Lives. A
crossGovernment strategy
for England
(2008) http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dft.gov.uk/about/strategy/transportstrategy/dasts/
Be
Active, B
e Healthy, A
plan
for getting
the
nation
moving
(2009) http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_094358
Building
a Sense
of Local B
elonging
(2009) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/communities/senseofbelonging
The
Government Response
to the
Taylor Review
of Rural E
conomy
and
Affordable
Housing
(2009) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/responsematthewtaylor
Environment A
gency: G
roundwater ProtectionPolicy
and
Practice
(documents
14) (2009) http://www.environmentagency.gov.uk/research/library/publications/40741.aspx
Clim
ate
change
and
biodiversity
adaptation: the
role
of the
spatial planning
system
(2009) http://naturalengland.etraderstores.com/NaturalEnglandShop/Product.aspx?ProductID=1b0e18e5cf754068a64405bd294e2cfb
Planning
Policy
Statement 4: P
lanning
and
economic
growth
(2009) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/planningpolicystatement4
DEFRA: How
well prepared
is the
UK
for clim
ate
change?
(2010) http://www.theccc.org.uk/reports/adaptation
Energy
Bill
(2010) http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/legislation/energy_bill/energy_bill.aspx
Flood
and
Water Management A
ct 2010
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/29/contents
Child
Poverty
Act 2010
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/9/contents
Localism
Bill
(2010) http://services.parliament.uk/bills/201011/localism/documents.htm
l Planning
Policy
Statement 5: P
lanning
for the
Historic
Environment (2010) http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/pps5
All Landscapes
Matter,
Natural E
ngland
Position
Statement (2010) http://www.naturalengland.gov.uk/Images/ALMps_tcm617120.pdf
23
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Regional
A Biodiversity
Audit of the
North
East (2001) http://www.nebiodiversity.org.uk/docs/1.pdf
The
North
East Rural A
ction
Plan
(2002) http://www.gos.gov.uk/nestore/docs/envandrural/reg_rural_policy/rural_action.pdf
Sustainable
Communities
in the
North
East:
Building
for the
Future
(2003) http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/communities/pdf/143600.pdf
Moving
Forward: The
Northern
Way
Growth
Strategy
(2004) http://www.thenorthernway.co.uk/document.asp?id=479
State
of the
Environment R
eport
for the
North
East (2004) http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/regions/north_east/sone/default.aspx
Natural E
ngland, C
ountryside
Character Volume
1: North
East (1998) http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/Images/countrysidecharactervolume1northeastintroductiontcm221111_tcm65194.pdf
North
East R
enewable
Energy
Strategy
(2005) http://www.energynortheast.net/lib/liDownload/1827/renew_energy_strat_nov05.pdf?CFID=4218453&CFTOKEN=79538365&jsessionid=a830233185e926e20495
Leading
the
Way: R
egional E
conomic
Strategy
(2006) http://www.onenortheast.co.uk/page/res.cfm
North
East E
ngland
Regional H
ousing
Strategy: Q
uality
Places
for a
Dynamic
Region
(2007) http://www.strategyintegrationne.co.uk/document.asp?id=365&pageno=7&extlink=14
The
North
East of E
ngland
Regional S
patial S
trategy
to 2021
(200) http://www.gos.gov.uk/nestore/docs/planning/rss/rss.pdf
Better Health, F
airer Health: NHS
(2008) http://www.gos.gov.uk/nestore/docs/health/strategy/better_health_final.pdf
Integrated
Regional Framework
for the
North
East S
USTAINE
(2008) http://www.sustaine.com
NE
Regional F
acilities
Strategy
(2008) http://www.sportengland.org/rfs.pdf
North
East S
trategy
for the
Environment (2008) http://www.onenortheast.co.uk/lib/liDownload/12905/NESE%20artwork_final%20approval.pdf?CFID=4096120&CFTOKEN=25927116
North
East C
limate
Change
Adaptation
Plan
(2008) http://adaptne.org/
North
East C
limate
Change
Action
Plan
(2008) http://www.neccap.org/purpose.htm
Local planning
documents
(including
SA) for:
Hambleton
District LPA
http://www.hambleton.gov.uk/environment_and_planning/planning/local_development_framework/default.htm
Durham
County
LPA
http://www.durham.gov.uk/Pages/Service.aspx?ServiceId=856
Stockton
Borough
LPA
http://www.stockton.gov.uk/citizenservices/planningdepartment/dev_plans/ldfhome/
Richmondshire
District LPA
http://www.richmondshire.gov.uk/planning/planningpolicy/localdevelopmentframework.aspx
Yorkshire
and
Humber RSS
http://www.eastriding.gov.uk/corpdocs/forwardplanning/docs/rss/m
ay08/rss.pdf
Cityregional
Natural E
ngland
Tees
Lowlands
Landscape
Character Assessment (1994) http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/ourwork/landscape/englands/character/areas/tees_lowlands.aspx
Natural E
ngland
Durham
Magnesian
Limestone
Plateau
Landscape
Character Assessment (1994) http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/ourwork/landscape/englands/character/areas/durham_magnesian_lim
estone_plateau.aspx
Natural E
ngland
Durham
Coalfield
Pennine
Fringe
Landscape
Character Assessment (1994) http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/ourwork/landscape/englands/character/areas/durham_coalfield_pennine_fringe.aspx
Environment A
gency: T
he
Wear Catchment A
bstraction
Management Strategy
(2006) http://publications.environmentagency.gov.uk/pdf/GENE0906BLHAEE.pdf
Tees
Valley
Sub
Regional H
ousing
Strategy
(2007) http://www.stockton.gov.uk/resources/housing/tvhsgstrat/tvhsgstrat.pdf
Tees
Valley
City
Region
Transport
Strategy
(2007) http://www.teesvalleyunlim
ited.gov.uk/transport/documents/TVCRTS.pdf
County
Durham
Biodiversity
Action
Plan
(2007) http://www.durhambiodiversity.org.uk/planstructure3.htm
Tees
Valley
Green
Infrastructure
Strategy
(2008) http://www.cabe.org.uk/files/teesvalleygreeninfrastructurestrategy.pdf
Environment A
gency: T
he
Tees
Catchment A
bstraction
Management Strategy
(2008) http://publications.environmentagency.gov.uk/pdf/GENE0308BNTEEE.pdf
Environment A
gency: T
ees
Catchment F
lood
Management P
lan
(2009) http://publications.environmentagency.gov.uk/pdf/GENE1109BRCKee.pdf
Environment A
gency: W
ear Catchment F
lood
Management P
lan
(2009) http://publications.environmentagency.gov.uk/pdf/GENE1109BRCNee.pdf
Tees
Valley
Strategic
Housing
Market A
ssessment (2009) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/Community%20Services/Housing/Marketsandneeds/TV%20SHMA%20Final%2031%2001%2009.pdf
Tees
Valley
Gypsy
and
Traveller Accommodation
Need
Assessment (TVGTA) (2009)
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/Development%
20and%20Environment/Development%
20and%20Regeneration/Planning%20Services/Policy/CoreStrategy/dec09/gypstandtravellerfinalreport.pdf
Limestone
Landscapes
Historic
Environment A
udit and
Action
Plan
(2009) http://content.durham.gov.uk/PDFRepository/Limestone_Landscapes_Historic_Environment_Audit.pdf
Wind
Farm
Development and
Landscape
Capacity
Studies: E
ast Durham
Limestone
and
Tees
Plain, A
RUP
2008
(&
Addendum, 2009)
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/Development%
20and%20Environment/Development%
20and%20Regeneration/Planning%20Services/Policy/CoreStrategy/Tees%20Plain%20FINAL.pdf
Environment A
gency: R
iver Basin
Management P
lan, N
orthumbria
River Basin
District (2009) http://www.environmentagency.gov.uk/research/planning/124807.aspx
Tees
Valley
Sport
Sub
Regional Facilities
Strategy
Draft
(2009) –
Hard
Copy
Tees
Valley
Area
Action
Plan
(transport) (2009) http://www.teesvalleyunlim
ited.gov.uk/transport/documents/TVAAP061109.pdf
Joint M
inerals
and
Waste
Development P
lan
Documents
for the
Tees
Valley
Submission
Draft
(2010) http://www.stockton.gov.uk/citizenservices/planningdepartment/dev_plans/ldfhome/mineralswaste/
Tees
Valley
Economic
and
Regeneration
Statement of A
mbition
(2010)
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/Development%
20and%20Environment/Development%
20and%20Regeneration/Planning%20Services/Policy/CoreStrategy/CS_Examination/TVU%20Statement%
20of%
20Ambition_TVU%20Board%20Executive%20Summary_%20July%202010
Tees
Valley
Investment P
lan
(Draft) (2010) (by
email)
The
Tees
Valley
Clim
ate
Change
Strategy
(20102020) http://www.teesvalleyunlim
ited.gov.uk/economyplanningenvironment/documents/Tees%20Valley%20Clim
ate%20Change%20Strategy%2020102020.pdf
Local
Adding
to
Quality
: A
Development S
trategy
for Darlington
Town
Centre
(2001) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/Documents/Development%
20and%20Environment/Development%
20and%20Regeneration/Planning%20Services/Policy/TownCentreStrategy.pdf
Darlington
Contaminated
Land
Strategy
(2003) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Environment/Pollution/contaminatedland/strategy.htm
Darlington
Borough
Council Conservation
Area
Character Appraisals
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Living/Planning+and+Building+Control/Planning+Services/ProtectionControl/Conservation/CharacterAppraisals.htm
Darlington
Urban
Capacity
Study
(2004) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Living/Planning+and+Building+Control/Planning+Services/Planning+Policy/DUCS.htm
All Together Now: A
Social Inclusion
Strategy
for Darlington
(2005) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/Documents/Chief%
20Executive%20Office/Social%
20Inclusion.pdf
Darlington
Local N
eighbourhood
Renewal S
trategy
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Living/Darlington+Local+Neighbourhood+Renewal+Strategy.htm
Darlington
Local H
ousing
Assessment (2005) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Housing/m
arketneeds/Housing+Market+and+Housing+Needs.htm
Darlington
Gateway
Strategy
(2006) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/Development%
20and%20Environment/Development%
20and%20Regeneration/Planning%20Services/Policy/BDP%20Report.pdf
Darlington, A
Town
on
the
Move: S
econd
Local Transport
Plan
200611
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Transport/Transport+Policy.htm
Darlington
Open
Space
Strategy
(20072012) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Living/Planning+and+Building+Control/Planning+Services/Planning+Policy/OpenSpaces.htm
Darlington
Play
and
Free
Time
Strategy
2007
– 2012
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/PublicMinutes/Cabinet/July%2010%202007/Supp%20Item%202%20%
20Appendix.pdf
24
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Older Persons’ H
ousing
Strategy
(2007) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/Community%20Services/Housing/OlderPersonsHousingStrategy07%2010.pdf
Private
Sector Housing
Renewal S
trategy
(2008) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/Community%20Services/Housing/HOUSING%20RENEWAL%20STRATEGY%202008%2012%20%
20FINAL.pdf
Darlington
Housing
Strategy
(20082012) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Housing/m
arketneeds/housingstrategy/Housing+Strategy+20082012.htm
Darlington
Characterisation
Study
(2008) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/Development%
20and%20Environment/Development%
20and%20Regeneration/Planning%20Services/Policy/DesignSDP/Characterisation%20Study.pdf
Community
Safety
Plan
2008
– 2011
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/Community%20Services/Community%20Safety%20Partnership/safercommunities/Community%20Safety%20Plan.pdf
All our Futures, A
Strategy
for Later Life
in Darlington
(20082011) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/Social%20Services/All%
20Our%
20Futures.pdf
Darlington
Children
and
Young
People’s
Plan
2008
– 2011
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Children/childrenstrust/CYPP/CYPP200811_V2.htm
Darlington
Primary
Capital P
rogramme
20082011
Hard
Copy
Sustainable
Community
Strategy
One
Darlington: P
erfectly
Placed
(20082021) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/ConnectingWithCommunities/25894%20Community%20Strategy%20FINAL.pdf
Strategic
Housing
Land
Availability
Assessment (SHLAA) (2009) and
updates
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Living/Planning+and+Building+Control/Planning+Services/Planning+Policy/HousingLandAvailabilitySchedule.htm
Darlington
Rights
of W
ay
Improvement P
lan
(2009) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/Development%
20and%20Environment/Countryside/ROWIP%20summary%201.pdf
DBC
Playing
Pitch
Strategy
(2009) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/PublicMinutes/Health%20and%20Well%
20Being%20Scrutiny%20Committee/September%
208%202009/080909%20Draft%20Sports%20Facilities%20and%20Playing%20Pitch%20Strategies%20App2.pdf
Local M
otion, D
arlington
Sustainable
Travel D
emonstration
(2009) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/Localmotion/Local_Motion_in_Darlington_final_report_FINAL_DRAFT_UPDATED.pdf
DBC
Sports
and
Physical A
ctivity
Facilities
Strategy
(2009) http://www.teesvalleysport.co.uk/files/draft_sport_and_physical_activity_facilities_strategy2.pdf
Darlington
Borough
Council –
Corporate
Plan
20092013
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/Partnership/Final%20Corporate%20Plan%20200913.pdf
Darlington
Borough
Council Strategic
Flood
Risk
Assessment Level 1
(2009) and
Level 2
(2010) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Living/Planning+and+Building+Control/Planning+Services/Planning+Policy/FloodRiskAssessment.htm
Darlington
Decentralised
and
Renewable
or Low
Carbon
Study, Entec
2009
(&
Update
2010)
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_public/documents/Development%
20and%20Environment/Development%
20and%20Regeneration/Planning%20Services/Policy/CoreStrategy/dec09/Final%20Report%20December%
2009%20rr009final%
20PART%201%20OF%203.pdf
Darlington
Homelessness
Strategy
201015
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/PublicMinutes/Cabinet/February%202%202010/Item%207%20%
20Appendix%201.pdf
Third
Local Transport
PlanDraft
(2010) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/ConnectingwithCommunities/Talking+Together/Transportplan.htm
Sustainable
Energy
Action
Plan
(2010) http://www.darlington.gov.uk/PublicMinutes/Economy%20and%20Environment%
20Scrutiny%20Committee/September%
202%202010/Item%205%20%
20Appendix%202.pdf
25
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
APPENDIX
2: SUSTAINABILITY
APPRAISAL
BASELINE
2011
Key
Not a
pplicable
Indicator is
not significantly above
(or below) national/regional average,
targets
and/or previous Borough
figures :
not a
key
sustainability
issue
*
Indicator is
slightly above
(or below) national/regional average, targets
and/or
previous Borough
figures :
potential sustainability
issue
**
Indicator is
significantly above
(or below) national/regional average, targets
and/or previous Borough
figures :
key
sustainability
issue
***
Sustainable
Development
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Ecological
Footprint
***
5.23
global
hectares per
capita
UK
ecological
footprint is
5.4
global
hectares per Capita
North
East ecological
footprint is
5.19
global hectares per
Capita
Tees Valley
ecological footprint is
5.12
global hectares
per Capita
Target to
achieve
an
ecological
footprint of 1.8
global hectares
per capita
as this
is, with
current
population
levels,
a budget for
sustainable
living
Shows Darlington
Borough
has an
ecological footprint of 0.17
global hectares
per capita
below
the
national average
but
has an
ecological footprint of 0.04
global
hectares per capita
above
the
regional
average.
Darlington’s
overall ecological footprint is
3.43
global hectares per capita
above
the
sustainable
living
limit and
is therefore
unsustainable
The
Tees Valley Footprint Report
(SEI)
2007
http://www.sei.se/m
ediamanager/documents/
Publications/Future/tees_valley_footprint.pdf
26
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Climate
Change
and
Energy
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Carbon
Dioxide
Emissions
***
CO2
emissions
(kilo
tonnes CO
2)
Industry and
commercial:
351
(2005)
340
(2006)
329
(2007)
335
(2008)
286
(2009)
319
(2010)
Domestic:
288
(2005)
286
(2006)
277
(2007)
281
(2008)
252
(2009)
271
(2010)
Road
Transport:
223
(2005)
221
(2006)
221
(2007)
207
(2008)
203
(2009)
203
(2010)
Per capita
(t):
8.8
(2005)
8.6
(2006)
8.3
(2007)
8.2
(2008)
7.4
(2009)
7.9
(2010)
North
East:
Overall:
13.1
tonnes of CO
2 per capita
(2005)
9.4
tonnes (2010)
UK:
8.8
tonnes of CO
2 per capita
(2005)
7.6
tonnes (2010)
Government
Targets:
Achieve
a 80%
reduction
in
greenhouse
gas
emissions by
2050
Reduce
UK
greenhouse
gas
emissions by
12.5%
by 2012
(Kyoto
Protocol)
Local Targets:
20%
reduction
in
CO2
emissions
between
2005
20
27%
reduction
in
CO2
emissions
between
2012
30
In 2005
Darlington
had
the
same
CO2
emissions per
capita
as the
national
average. Both
figures have
dropped
gradually
although
Darlington’s
have
dropped
more
slowly, m
eaning
the
borough’s
per capita
emissions are
now
0.3
tonnes above
the
national average.
Further effort
will
be
required
to
meet
challenging
local targets
Emissions of carbon
dioxide
for local authority
areas
http://www.decc.gov.
uk/assets/decc/11/sta
ts/clim
ate
change/6223local
andregionalco2
emissionsestimates
for200.xls
(accessed
Sep
2012)
Darlington
Borough
Council (DBC) Policy
Department
DBC
Corporate
Plan
20082012
Darlington
Clim
ate
Change
Action
Plan
2009/10
DBC
Renewable
Energy
Action
Plan
2010
27
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Climate
Change
and
Energy
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
NI186: P
er capita
reduction
in CO
2
emissions:
reduction
from
the
2005
baseline
figure
was 0.9
tonnes (10%) in
2010
Energy
***
Electricity
consumption
(kWh):
Average
domestic:
4,047
(05)
3,978
(06)
3,856
(07)
3,736
(08)
3,697
(09)
3,677
(10)
Average
Industry and
commercial:
88,758
(05)
89,211
(06)
84,738
(07)
84,526
(08)
82,431
(09)
78,896
(10)
Gas
consumption
(kWh):
Average
domestic:
19,591
(05)
18,771
(06)
18,022
(07)
17,318
(08)
15,716
(09)
15,443
(10)
Average
Industry and
commercial:
1,071,580
(05)
1,000,164
(06)
1,041,271
(07)
North
East Electricity
Consumption
(kWh):
Average
domestic: 3,563
(10)
Average
industry and
commercial:
98,849
(10)
Great Britain
Electricity
Consumption
(kWh):
Average
domestic: 4,148
(10)
Average
industry and
commercial: 77,705
(10)
North
East Gas
Consumption
(kWh):
Average
domestic: 15,444
(10)
Average
industry and
commercial: 794,974
(10)
Great Britain
Gas
Consumption
(kWh):
Average
domestic: 15,156
(10)
Average
industry and
commercial:
690,910
(10)
Not a
pplicable
Average
domestic electricity
use
has reduced
steadily
by
a total of 9%
since
2005
and
is
11%
below
the
national
average, but above
the
regional average
by 3%.
Average
industrial and
commercial electricity use
dropped
overall by 11%
since
2005
and
is below
the
regional average
by 20%
but
above
the
national average
by 2%. A
sharp
fall in
Darlington’s
figure
in th
e last
year bucked
the
regional and
national trend.
Average
domestic gas use
has dropped
by a
total of
21%
since
2005
and
is level
with
the
regional average
but
2%
above
the
national
average.
Average
industrial and
commercial gas use
has
fluctuated, with
a sharp
rise
in
the
last year taking
it 16%
above
the
figure
for 2005
and
into
the
top
25
authorities in
http://www.decc.gov.
uk/en/content/cms/sta
tistics/energy_stats/re
gional/regional.aspx
(Accessed
Sep
2012)
28
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Climate
Change
and
Energy
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
1,016,328
(08)
1,030,741
(09)
1,243,152
(10)
England
for this
indicator.
Home
insulation
installing
rates
**
Insulation
installed
under the
CERT
scheme: T
otal for 08/09
and
09/10
Darlington
Total cavity wall installation: 1,251
Total loft
insulation: 2,210
NorthEast England
Total cavity wall installation:
55,572
Total loft
insulation: 80,940
Great Britain
Total cavity wall installation:
1,009,398
Total loft
insulation: 1,225,985
Energy Saving
Trust
http://www.energysavingtr
ust.org.uk/business/Busin
ess/Inform
ation/Homes
EnergyEfficiency
DatabaseHEED/CERT
reportsfrom
HEED/CERTreportfrom
HEEDQ
8bylocal
authority
Annual C
O2
emissions per
dwelling
(private
sector
dwellings)
**
Proportion
of private
sector
dwellings
in the
Borough
emitting
X
tonnes
of CO2
p.a.
Under 1
tonne: 1.3%
12
tonnes: 8
.1%
23
tonnes: 2
5.1%
34
tonnes: 2
4.3%
45
tonnes: 2
0%
56
tonnes: 8
.7%
Over 6
tonnes: 12.5%
DBC
Private
Sector
House
Condition
Survey
2009
http://www.darlington.gov.
uk/dar_public/documents/
Community%20Services/
Housing/privatesectorhou
secondition.pdf
Accessed
Feb
2011
Renewable
Energy
***
Permitted
and
proposed
capacity
Planning
perm
ission
has been
granted
for 5
wind
turbines generating
a
total of 6.5MW
capacity at R
oyal
Oak, plus one
small offgrid
wind
turbine, a
nd
one
wind
turbine
in th
e
outline
perm
ission
for the
Lingfield
Point d
evelopment.
Two
perm
issions for biomass boilers
in
schools.
Two
small wind
turbines in
the
planning
pipeline.
9 turbines, totalling
21MW
capacity, a
t the
preplanning
stage
Not a
pplicable
Target of 10%
of electricity to
be
provided
by
renewable
sources in
the
North
East
region
by 2010
(454
MW
minimum
installed
capacity) with
the
aspiration
to
double
this
by
2020
Not a
pplicable
ANEC: T
ees Plain
and
East D
urham
Limestone
Wind
Farm
Development
and
Landscape
Capacity
Study
http://www.northeastasse
mbly.gov.uk/document.as
p?id=914
(2008)
(accessed
April 2009)
ENTEC: D
ecentralised
Renewable
and
Low
Carbon
Energy Study
(2009)
29
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Climate
Change
and
Energy
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Potential Capacity
The
Tees Plain
and
East D
urham
Limestone
Wind
Farm
Development
and
Landscape
Capacity Study
identifies that a
zone
in the
North
East
of Darlington
Borough
has the
capacity to
accommodate
a small –
medium
small scale
wind
development (i.e. 46
turbines per
development of between
7.5
– 25MW)
The
Decentralised
Renewable
and
Low
Carbon
Energy Study identifies
that wind
and
biomass have
the
most
significant potential for meeting
the
Borough’s
energy demands and
reducing
carbon
dioxide
emissions.
Areas identified
include:
The
town
centre
and
adjoining
high
density areas with
potential for a
biomass heating
or combined
power,
heating
and
cooling
network
Three
‘areas of search’ for wind
turbine
development to
the
north
east,
south
and
west of the
Borough
http://www.darlington.gov.
uk/Generic/SearchResults
.htm
?q=renewable+energ
y (accessed
March
2010)
TNEI N
orth
East R
egion
Renewable
Energy
Strategy
http://www.energynorthea
st.net/lib/liDownload/1827/
renew_energy_strat_nov0
5.pdf?CFID=4218453&CF
TOKEN=79538365&jsessi
onid=a8308eb05ceb5e3f3
35d
(2005) (accessed
April 2009)
GONE: T
he
North
East of
England
Plan
Regional
Spatial S
trategy to
2021
http://www.northeastasse
mbly.gov.uk/document.as
p?id=887
(2008)
(accessed
April 2009)
Renewable
energy
generation
in
private
dwellings
2009
%
of private
sector dwellings
in
survey
with:
Solar water heating: 0.46%
Photo
voltaic: 0.04%
Other renewables: 0
.00%
2012
There
have
been
137
building
control
applications for solar panels
(heating
or PV, m
ainly
the
latter)
registered
to
domestic addresses. N
early all date
Although
the
survey results
are
too
small to
be
robust,
they indicate
a very
low
level
of domestic renewable
energy generation.
DBC
Private
Sector
House
Condition
Survey
2009
http://www.darlington.gov.
uk/dar_public/documents/
Community%20Services/
Housing/privatesectorhou
secondition.pdf
Accessed
Feb
2011
30
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Climate
Change
and
Energy
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
from
the
last two
years. T
his
amounts
to
0.3%
of the
number of dwellings in
the
borough. U
ncertain
what
proportion
of such
installations do
not
go
through
building
control.
Environmental Protection
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Air
Quality
**
There
continues to
be
no
need
to
declare
any
Air
Quality Management Areas as air
pollutants
do
not e
xceed
regulated
emissions
in the
vicinity of target group
members
Local m
easurements
of traffic
related
air
pollutants
include:
Nitrogen
Dioxide
(40
µg/m³ max target)
Cockerton
Bridge
Station
20
(2005)
23
(2006)
23
(2007)
20
(2008)
27
(2009)
29
(2010)
St C
uthbert’s
Station
41
(2005)
42
(2006)
35
(2007)
44
(2008)
49
(2009)
41
(2010)
Particulate
Matter PM
10
40
µg/m³ max target)
Cockerton
Bridge
Station
20
(2005)
22
(2006)
21
(2007)
21
(2007)
Not a
pplicable
Government
objectives for air
quality currently
cover ten
pollutants:
•
Particulate
Matter
(PM
10
&
PM
2.5)
•
Nitrogen
dioxide
(NO
x)
•
Ozone
(O
3)
•
Sulphur
dioxide
(SO
2)
•
Polycyclic
Aromatic
Hydrocarbo
ns (PAHs)
•
Benzene
•
1,3
butadiene
•
Carbon
monoxide
(CO)
•
Lead
Within
the
Darlington
Council area,
domestic /
commercial heating
is
largely
fuelled
by natural gas, w
hich
gives low
levels
of emissions
compared
with
other carbon
based
fuels. T
here
are
few
large
industrial
processes within
the
Council area,
and
there
is no
significant impact
from
industrial sources outside
of
the
Council area.
Road
traffic
is the
main
source
of
nitrogen
dioxide
pollution
at ground
level,
but this
norm
ally
quickly
disperses within
a relatively
short
distance
of the
kerbside. There
is
no
clear sign
of nitrogen
dioxide
levels
from
traffic
falling, with
emission
improvements
generally
being
offset b
y traffic
flow
increases. Emissions exceeded
the
Government target at the
St
Cuthbert’s
station
in all but one
of
the
last six
years. H
owever,
there
are
no
areas of relevant exposure
within
40m
of the
monitoring
point.
Emissions of PM
10
are
well within
the
target set and
have
decreased
Darlington
Borough
Council
Review
and
Assessment of Air
Quality –
Updating
and
Screening
Report
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_
public/documents/Development%
20and%20Environment/Public%2
0Protection/Pollution%20and%20
Regulation/Darlington%20Air%20
Quality%20Review%2020061.pdf
(2006) (accessed
April 2009)
2011
Air
Quality Progress Report
for Darlington
http://www.darlington.gov.uk
/dar_public/documents/_Pla
ce/PolicyRegeneration/Publi
cProtection/Airquality/Air_Q
uality_Progress_Report_for
_Darlington_2011.pdf
(accessed
Sept 2012)
Air
Quality in
the
Tees Valley
20052008
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_
public/documents/Corporate%20S
ervices/Public%20Protection/Envi
ronmental%20Health/Tees%20Va
31
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Environmental Protection
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
18
(2009)
19
(2010)
St C
uthbert’s
Station
31
(2005)
34
(2006)
27
(2007)
28
(2008)
25
(2009)
26
(2010)
•
Ammonia
at both
monitoring
stations since
2005.
lley%20Annual%
20Report%2020
09.pdf (accessed
October 2009)
Authorised
Processes
*
Industrial activities registered
with
the
Environment A
gency for Integrated
Pollution
Prevention
and
Control (IPPC) comprise:
IneosPVC
manufacture
Protim
SolignumTimber treatm
ent
manufacture
Ellison
Metal F
inishing
LtdSurface
treatm
ent
of m
etals
and
plastic m
aterials
HT
and
SR
DentBroiler production
unit
HM
Pigs LtdPig
breeding
unit
Local A
uthority
Integrated
Pollution
Control
Sites0
sites
Local A
uthority
Air
Pollution
Control S
ites: 29
sites in
total
N/a
N/a
N/a
Darlington
Borough
Council
http://www.darlington.gov.uk
/Environment/Pollution/Air+
Quality/Industrial+Pollution+
Control.htm
(accessed
Feb
2011)
Pollution
Incidents
**
20012010
17
recorded
significant incidents, including
five
on
and
adjacent to
the
Cleveland
Trading
Estate, five
on
the
Albert
Hill
Industrial E
state,
and
two
at D
rinkfield.
Three
recorded
major incidents, two
in th
e
Brafferton
area
and
one
near Piercebridge.
The
most common
single
source
of incidents
was atm
ospheric pollutants
and
effects.
N/a
N/a
N/a
Environment Agency website
http://www.environment
agency.gov.uk/homeandleisure/3
7821.aspx
(accessed
Sep
2012)
Contaminated
Land
As of 2003
Darlington
Borough
Council had
identified
more
than
2000
potentially
contaminated
sites. T
his
figure
is high
due
to
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
The
number of contaminated
land
sites in
the
Borough
is reducing.
Darlington
Borough
Council,
Environmental H
ealth
32
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Environmental Protection
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
***
Darlington’s
industrial past.
However,
by 2009
this
estimate
was reduced
to
1280, by 2011
the
figure
was 1100
and
by 2012
it was 988.
Darlington
Borough
Council,
Contaminated
Land
Inspection
Strategy
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_
public/Documents/Development%
20and%20Environment/Public%2
0Protection/Pollution%20and%20
Regulation/Contaminated%20Lan
d%20Strategy.pdf (accessed
April 2009)
Previously
developed
land
that is
vacant/derelict
***
NI170: Previously
developed
land
that has
been
vacant or derelict for more
than
5 years:
2.70%
(2006/07)
4.01%
(2007/08)
3.84%
(2008/09)
Not a
pplicable
No
local target
set
Shows a
1.14%
increase
in the
%
of previously
developed
land
that
has been
vacant or derelict for
more
than
5 years
Darlington
Borough
Council Policy
Department
River Quality
***
Biological Quality
(Previous General Q
uality
Assessment S
cheme)
% of river length
assessed
as good
biological
quality
2000
– 41.21%
2002
– 58.06%
2003
– 58.06%
2004
– 51.91%
2005
– 52.38%
Chemical Quality
(Previous GQA
Scheme)
% of river length
assessed
as good
chemical
quality
2000
– 37.48%
2002
– 39.23%
2003
– 32.34%
2004
– 48.83%
2005
– 68.61%
2005
average
good
rating
for
UK
biological
river quality
was 54.2%
2005
average
good
rating
for
UK
chemical
river quality
was 57.08%
Previous GQA
targets
have
been
superceded
by
Water
Framework
Directive
(WFD)
targets
The
WFD
requires all
natural inland
and
coastal
water bodies to
obtain
‘good
ecological status
and
chemical
status by 2015.
Artificial or
heavily
modified
water bodies
Shows that in
2005
biological river
quality in
Darlington
was below
the
national average
by 1.82%.
Under the
new
WFD
assessment
method, ecological quality (which
includes biological quality) credits
Darlington’s
rivers
and
tributaries
with
a range
of quality values from
Poor/Poor Potential (the
Skerne,
the
Tees below
the
Skerne, and
Neasham
Stell)
to
Good
(the
Dene
Beck and
the
upper Cocker Beck).
The
ecological quality of most river
stretches will
need
to im
prove
to
achieve
‘good’ status by 2015
In term
s of chemical quality the
previous GQA
shows that in
2005
chemical river quality in
Darlington
was above
the
national average
by
GQA
results –
Audit Commission
website
http://www.areaprofiles.audit
commission.gov.uk/(twnb0f34rbgi
bo55tke0pp55)/DetailPage.aspx?
entity=10004878
(accessed
April
2009)
WFD
results –
Environment
Agency website
http://m
aps.environment
agency.gov.uk/wiyby/wiybyContro
ller?value=Darlington&lang=_e&e
p=map&topic=wfd_rivers&layerG
r oups=default&scale=3&textonly=o
ff
(accessed
February
2011)
33
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Environmental Protection
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Water Framework
Directive
Assessment
2008
Current Ecological Q
uality
Good:
Dene
Beck; U
pper Cocker Beck
Moderate
Potential:
Tees from
River Greta
to River Skerne;
Lustrum
Beck; W
oodham
Burn
(predicted
Good
Potential by 2015)
Moderate:
Bishopton
Beck; K
illerby Beck.
Poor Potential:
Tees from
Skerne
to Low
Worsall;
Skerne
from
Woodham
Beck to
River Tees
Poor:
Billingham
Beck, m
iddle
section;
Neasham
Stell (predicted
to
be
Moderate
by
2015)
Current C
hemical Q
uality
Good:
Tees from
Greta
Beck to
River Skerne; T
ees
from
Skerne
to Low
Worsall;
Lustrum
Beck; S
kerne
from
Woodham
Beck to
River Tees; Billingham
Beck, m
iddle
section.
Draft
results
for assessed
rivers
in
England
and
Wales show
that for overall
ecological
classification
23%
of rivers
are
good
or
better,
60%
are
moderate,
12%
are
poor
and
4%
are
bad
need
to
achieve
a
good
‘ecological
potential and
chemical status
by 2015.
11.53%. H
owever,
under the
Water
Framework
Directive
scheme
a
pass or a
fail is
awarded. O
f Darlington’s
rivers
and
tributaries
that have
been
assessed
all have
improved
to ‘good’ chemical
standard.
Groundwater
Quality
***
Most of Darlington
borough
is underlain
by th
e
Wear Magnesian
Limestone
groundwater
body, which
is poor in
both
quantitative
and
chemical term
s.
Areas of the
Borough
from
Heighington
and
Not a
pplicable
The
Water
Framework
Directive
requires all
natural inland
Predicted
status of Darlington’s
groundwater remains poor by 2015.
The
Magnesian
Limestone
groundwater body has issues with
Environment Agency website
http://m
aps.environment
agency.gov.uk/wiyby/wiybyContro
ller?x=428500.0&y=514500.0&sc
ale=3&layerG
roups=default&locati
34
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Environmental Protection
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Summerhouse
westwards, Sadberge
eastwards and
Hurworth/Neasham
southwards are
underlain
by adjacent
groundwater bodies, which
are
good
in both
quantitative
and
chemical term
s.
and
coastal
water bodies to
obtain
‘good
ecological status
and
chemical
status by 2015
respect to
both
quality and
quantity.
The
particular issues are
nitrates,
mine
water pollution
and
potential
abstraction
pressures throughout
the
area. A
rising
trend
in nitrate
concentration
in the
groundwater
body has been
identified
and
will
be
addressed
and
mitigated
by th
e
Nitrate
Pollution
Prevention
Regulations 2008.
on=Darlington,%
20Darlington&ep
=map&lang=_e&textonly=off&topi
c=wfd_groundwaters#x=431289&
y=514743&lg=2,7,9,&scale=4
(accessed
February
2011)
Water Use
and
Abstraction
*
Daily
domestic
water use
(per capita
consumption,
litres):
Daily: 136
Abstraction
Water is
available
at low
flows with
an
abstraction
limit of 3.8
mega
litres a
day all
year.
Average
daily
domestic
water use
for
the
UK
is 154
litres
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Reduce
abstraction
to
3.6
mega
litres a
day all year by
2014
Shows that daily
domestic water
consumption
in Darlington
is
18
litres less than
the
national average
It is
anticipated
that no
water will
be
available
for further licensing
at low
flows by 2014
Audit Commission
website
http://www.areaprofiles.audit
commission.gov.uk/(twnb0f34rbgi
bo55tke0pp55)/ChartPage.aspx?i
d=10004876&chartIndex=6&scree
nWidth=1255&screenHeight=835
(accessed
April 2009)
Environment Agency: T
he
Tees
Catchment Abstraction
Management Strategy
http://publications.environment
agency.gov.uk/pdf/GENE0308BN
TEEE.PDF
(2008) (accessed
April 2009)
Flooding
***
Flood
risk
to
development sites:
11
of the
potential development sites
assessed
through
the
SFRA
are
at m
edium
risk of fluvial flooding.
19
sites are
at high
risk of fluvial flooding
43
of the
46
sites were
found
by the
SFRA
Level 2
to have
some
risk of surface
water
flooding.
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Flood
risk is
likely
to
increase
over the
next 2
5 years
due
to
the
impacts
of clim
ate
change
Darlington
Borough
Council
Strategic
Flood
Risk Assessment
Level 1(2009) and
Level 2
(2010)
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Livin
g/Planning+and+Building+Control/
Planning+Services/Planning+Poli
cy/FloodRiskAssessment.htm
(accessed
Feb
2011)
SFRAs of neighbouring
authorities.
35
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Environmental Protection
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
A large
part
of the
centre
of Darlington
adjacent to
the
Skerne
is at risk of flooding.
The
area
at risk includes business use
but
also
some
highly
vulnerable
sites (e.g.
emergency services).
Flood
risk
in
neighbouring
authorities:
County
Durham:
The
SFRA
Level 1
identifies a
flood
risk
arising
from
Woodham
Burn
(whose
upper
reaches are
partly
in Darlington
Borough) for
residential properties and
a school in
Newton
Aycliffe.
Stockton
Borough:
There
are
various small watercourses flowing
out of Darlington
borough
into
Stockton, for
which
the
Stockton
SFRA
identifies areas in
Flood
Risk Zones 2
and
3.
Richmondshire
District:
The
relevant SFRA
identifies areas near the
Tees, including
nearly all of CroftonTees
village
and
much
of Cleasby, as being
in
Flood
Risk Zone
3.
Biodiversity
and
Geodiversity
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Designated
Sites Sites of
Special
Scientific
Interest
*
4 Sites of Special S
cientific Interest:
Neasham
Fen
– 2.2
ha
– Favourable
–
(designated
as a
geological S
SSI)
–
Provides an
important record
of Flandrian
vegetation
history
and
environmental
change
– 100%
meeting
PSA
target
Overall
condition
of
SSSI’s in
the
Durham
County
area:
Favourable
–
12.36%
The
Government’s Public
Service
Agreement (PSA)
target is
to
have
95%
of the
SSSI area
in favourable
or
recovering
condition
by 2010
All of Darlington’s
SSSI’s currently
meet the
PSA
target.
100%
of the
SSSI area
is in
a favourable
condition
compared
to16.78%
at the
County
level.
Natural E
ngland
website
http://www.sssi.
naturalengland.
org.uk/special/s
ssi/report.cfm
?c
ategory=C,CF
36
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Biodiversity
and
Geodiversity
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Hell Kettles –
3.51
ha
–Favourable
(up
from
Unfavourable
Recovering)Only
site
in
County
Durham
area
where
open
water
fed
by calcareous springs occur.
Only
site
with
sawsedge
dominated
swamp, very
rare
and
local w
etland
plants
– 100%
meeting
PSA
target
Redcar Field
– 0.68
ha
– Favourable
Supports a
range
of fen
vegetation
types
not found
at any other site
in County
Durham. O
nly
site
known
to
contain
fen
meadow
– 100%
meeting
PSA
target
Newton
Ketton
Meadow
– 1.9ha
–
Favourable
One
of the
very
few
surviving
unimproved
hay m
eadows in
the
coastal plain
between
the
River Tyne
and
Tees –
100%
meeting
PSA
target.
Site
is
now
in ELS/HLS
agreement.
•
Total hectares designated
– 8.29
ha
•
% of Borough
= 0.04%
Unfavourable,
recovering
–
86.11%
Unfavourable,
no
change
–
0.69%
Unfavourable
declining
–
0.84%
(accessed
Sep
12)
Designated
Sites –
Local
Nature
Reserves
**
Darlington
has 8
LNR’s
, three
candidate
LNRs and
3 community woodlands:
The
Whinnies LNR
– 11.46ha
– Diverse
site
of grassland, woodland
and
wetland.
Home
to a
variety
of unusual orchids and
butterflies
•
Drinkfield
Marsh
– 5.77ha
– Home
to
many over wintering
birds
•
Brinkburn
– 1.76
ha
– dominated
by a
pond
and
wet woodland
•
Brankin
Moor –
1.82ha
– In
cludes a
woodland
rich
in orchids and
other
Not a
pplicable
Natural E
ngland
target of 1ha
of
Local N
ature
Reserve
per 1,000
of the
population
Darlington
currently falls
short
of
Natural E
ngland’s
target by 0.35
ha
/
1000
of the
population
Darlington
Borough
Council website
http://www.darlingto
n.gov.uk/dar_public
/documents/Comm
unity%20Services/
CountrysideandRO
W/Green%20Space
s%20inform
ation.pd
f (accessed
May
2009)
DBC
Planning
Policy team
37
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Biodiversity
and
Geodiversity
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
woodland
plants
•
Geneva
wood
– 13.12ha
– small
woodland
site
•
Rockwell –
22.16ha
green
space
in
the
heart
of the
town
•
Maidendale
Fishing
and
Nature
Reserve
– 7.51ha
– Includes wetlands
and
grasslands
•
West P
ark
– 0.5ha
contains chalk
grassland
•
Total hectares designated
– 64.1
ha
•
% of Borough
= 0.32%
•
Equates to
0.64
ha/1,000
pop
SSSIs
and
other wildlife
sites within
1km
of the
Borough
boundaries
**
Middridge
Quarry SSSI,
Shildon;
Internationally
important palaeontological
site
Whitton
Bridge
Pasture
SSSI &
Briarcroft
Pasture
SSSI
These
two
SSSIs
in Stockton
Borough
near Bishopton
comprise
the
only
remaining
MG5
speciesrich
unimproved
grassland
sites in
the
Tees Lowlands; of
national importance.
Byerley LNR, N
ewton
Aycliffe, D
urham
Stillington
Forest P
ark, S
tockton
SNCIs:
• Brusselton
Wood, S
t Helen
Auckland,
Durham
• Embankment E
of Shildon, Durham
• Pond
at Heighington
Lane
West,
Newton
Aycliffe, D
urham
• Quarry at Long
Track Lane, Aycliffe
Whitton
Bridge
PastureFavourable
condition. R
equires protection
from
spray from
adjacent land. (adjoins
Darlington
Borough)
Briarcroft
PastureUnfavourable,
recovering
Concentration
of SNCIs, especially
woodland, a
long
the
River Tees
Natural E
ngland
website
http://www.natureo
nthemap.org.uk/m
a
p.aspx?m=sssi
(accessed
February
2011)
Adjacent LPAs
38
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Biodiversity
and
Geodiversity
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Village, Durham
• Sandy Leas Lane
verge, W
hinney Hill,
Stockton
• Sandyleas Plantation, W
hinney Hill,
Stockton
• Longnewton
Reservoir, Longnewton,
Stockton
• Pond
N of A67, nr DTV
Airport,
Stockton
• Bowlhole
Wood, nr Low
Middleton,
Stockton
• Beverley W
ood, H
ornby, Hambleton
• W
oodland
adj. Tees, W
of H
igh
Sockburn, Richmondshire
• Monk End
Wood, C
roftonTees,
Richmondshire
• South
of Straw
Gate, S
tapleton,
Richmondshire
• Land
N of Cleasby, R
ichmondshire
• Land
at H
owden
Hill, C
leasby,
Richmondshire
• W
oodland
adj Tees, Manfield,
Richmondshire
NI 197
Im
proved
Local
Biodiversity
**
2011/12
Proportion
of local sites where
positive
conservation
management has been
or is
being
implemented: 37%
2008/09
figure:
13%
2008/09
Proportion
of
local sites
where
positive
conservation
management
has been
or is
being
implemented:
Hartlepool:
None
set (baseline
year)
Shows that Darlington
Borough
form
erly had
the
lowest proportion
of
local sites where
positive
conservation
management w
as being
implemented
of the
Tees Valley authorities.
Whilst up
to date
inform
ation
for the
other authorities is
not a
vailable, the
figure
for Darlington
has seen
a very
significant improvement.
New
data
from
Strategy and
Perform
ance
section.
Hub
Data
https://www.hub.inf
o4local.gov.uk/DIH
WEB/Homepage.as
px (accessed
March
2010)
39
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Biodiversity
and
Geodiversity
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
24%
Middlesbrough
: 35%
Redcar and
Cleveland:
13%
Stockton: 29%
Priority
habitats
***
Darlington
contains the
following
Priority
Habitats
listed
in th
e UK
Biodiversity
Action
Plan
(BAP):
•
Lowland
meadows (5.1ha)
•
Lowland
calcareous grassland
– very
rarer (0.6ha)
•
Lowland
dry
acid
grassland
– very
rare
(1ha)
•
Fens –
very
rare
(1ha)
•
Reedbeds –
very
rare
(0.5ha)
•
Purple
moorgrass and
rush
pastures
– very
rare
(0.55ha)
Not a
pplicable
Overarching
target:
Ensure
that there
is no
loss in
the
extent or quality of the
North
East R
egion’s
existing
resource
of UK
BAP
habitats
BAP
habitats
in the
Town
Centre
Fringe
include:
‘Rivers
and
Streams’
Actions: A
chieve
Water Framework
Directive
target of good
ecological
potential;
Support
and
encourage
the
use
of buffer strips
along
watercourses
to
improve
riparian
habitat and
water
quality; Identify
opportunities
to
restore
engineered
and
culverted
watercourses,
particularly
in urban
areas. A
lso
to
prevent further deterioration
to existing
rivers
and
streams.
Brownfield
Land
Actions: Increase
extent of early
successional open
mosaic
habitat by
carrying
out on
site.
management work..
Identify
and
protect
the
most important sites
through
Local
Sites
designation
review.
Broadleaved
mixed
lowland
woodland
Support
the
creation
of new
native
woodland
through
EWGS, and
the
restoration
to favourable
condition
of
ASNW
(including
PAWS),
promoting
these
scheme
to TVBP
partner
organisations
and
other landowners.
Lowland
Meadows –
no
comprehensive
account of decline
in
Durham
BAP
area
but in
the
UK
individual counties have
reported
an
annual loss of 10%
Lowland
Calcareous Grassland
– Has
declined
markedly
since
the
Second
World
War largely
through
agricultural
intensification
Lowland
Dry
Acid
Grassland
–
Continues to
be
a rare
and
fragmented
resource
in the
Durham
BAP
area
Fens and
Reedbeds –
Continue
to be
fragmented
habitats
with
numerous
threats
Purple
Moor Grass and
rush
Pastures
– no
trend
identified
but very
rare
in
Darlington
Biodiversity Targets
and
Indicators
for
the
north
east of
England
(NE
Biodiversity
Forum)
(http://www.nebiodi
versity.org.uk/docs/
2.pdf)
(2004) (accessed
March
2010)
A Biodiversity Audit
of the
North
East (NE
Biodiversity Forum)
(http://www.nebiodi
versity.org.uk/docs/
1.pdf)
(2001) (accessed
March
2010)
Durham
Biodiversity Action
Plan
http://www.durham
biodiversity.org.uk/
planstructure3.htm
(accessed
March
2010)
40
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Biodiversity
and
Geodiversity
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Hedgerows
Encourage
the
planting
of new
hedgerows
in keeping
with
local
character (including
hedgerow
trees),
through
agrienvironment schemes,
particularly
along
historic
boundaries
that were
once
hedged.
Lowland
meadow
Designate
lowland
meadows
as
Local
Wildlife
Sites.
Ponds, lakes
and
reservoirs
Encourage
the
creation
of new
ponds
as
part
of the
landscaping
of new
developments
by
producing
and
promoting
a best practice
guide
for
planners
and
developers.
Roadside
Verges
Ensure
that all relevant habitat policy
is
included
in local planning
documents
and
supplementary
planning
guidance
where
relevant,
to
protect,
enhance
or
create
new
landscape
features
of
wildlife
importance
along
transport
corridors
and
to ensure
that ecological
surveys
are
undertaken
prior to
the
determ
ination
of new
transport
schemes.
Darlington
Borough
Council
Countryside
Team
Priority
Species
***
Darlington
contains the
following
Priority
Species listed
in the
UK
Biodiversity
Action
Plan
(BAP):
Mammals
Water Vole
Brown
Hare
European
Otter
Bat species
Birds
Skylark
Linnet
Reed
Bunting
Not a
pplicable
Targets
for Tees
Valley
BAP
area:
Water vole:
Ensure
existing
populations
are
protected, and
their
habitat enhanced
and
extended
through
development
control and
flood
risk
operations.
GCN
Strengthen
and
expand
known
metapopulations
by
carrying
out pond
creation
and
management w
ork
through
the
Tees
Valley
Pondscape
Project.
Harvest mouse
Develop
suitable
habitat links
around
Water Vole
– severe
decline
– national
protection
status
Brown
Hare
– Little
inform
ation
on
population
trends but believed
to be
widespread
Otter –
Widespread
on
the
Tees. T
he
Skerne
remains to
be
fully
colonised.
Some
encouraging
signs in
term
s of
expansion
of range
but species is
still
rare
and
has European
Protection
Status
Pipistrelle
Bat –
ubiquitous
throughout the
whole
of the
area. H
as
European
protection
status
Durham
Biodiversity Action
Plan
http://www.durham
biodiversity.org.uk/
planstructure3.htm
(accessed
Feb
2011)
Darlington
Borough
Council
Countryside
Team
41
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Biodiversity
and
Geodiversity
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Corn
Bunting
Spotted
Flycatcher
Tree
Sparrow
Grey Partridge
Bullfinch
Song
Thrush
Amphibian
Great C
rested
Newt
Crustacean
White
Clawed
Crayfish
In addition, the
following
species recorded
in
Darlington
Borough
are
featured
in th
e
Tees Valley BAP:
Dingy Skipper
Grayling
Forester moth
Harvest Mouse
Black Poplar
Swift
Yellow
Wagtail
Tufted
Sedge
Brown
Trout
Eel
Salmon
current sites
to
allow
species
to
extend
range
Skylark
– Numbers
are
down
by about
38%
since
1994
in the
region
as a
whole
Linnet –
very
common
and
well
distributed
species
Reed
Bunting
– Declined
nationally
by
over 60%
since
the
70’s
but remains
widespread
in lowland
areas. T
he
DBAP
breeding
population
is between
500
and
800
pairs
Corn
Bunting
– Have
decreased
by at
least 95%
in the
North
East since
the
70’s
Spotted
Flycatcher –
In sharp
decline
Tree
Sparrow
– Have
decreased
by at
least 50%
in the
North
East since
the
70’s. Locally common
but sparsely
distributed
Song
Thrush–
Populations are
fairly
stable
at low
numbers.
Barn
Owl:
Recent revival in
numbers
Great Crested
Newt –Decline
in
recent years. S
tudies indicate
a
national rate
of colony loss of
approximately
2%
over 5
years
White
Clawed
Crayfish
– Thought to
have
declined
dramatically
in recent
decades
42
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Waste
and
Minerals
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Waste
management
sites
Household
Waste
Recycling
Sites:
Whessoe
Rd
Bring
Sites: There
are
17
sites
distributed
across the
Borough
Waste
Transfer Stations:
There
are
no
waste
transfer
stations in
the
Borough. W
aste
to
be
disposed
of at landfill or to
be
recycled
is transported
directly to
Aycliffe
which
is 1
mile
outside
of Darlington
Borough
and
5 m
iles from
Darlington
Borough
Council’s
waste
depot
Landfill
sites:
Located
at Aycliffe
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
The
amount of waste
management sites in
the
Borough
may change
over time.
Darlington
Borough
Council
Waste
Minimisation
and
Recycling
Officer
Household
Waste
**
Waste
produced
(tonnes)
66,692.52
(2006/07)
66,063.88
(2007/08)
62,999.41
(2008/09)
NI193: %
of municipal w
aste
landfilled
67.5
(2006/07)
65.3
(2007/08)
62.8
(2008/09)
47.3
(2009/10)
Waste
collected
(kg/head) BV
84
515
(2000/01)
522
(2001/02)
508
(2003/04)
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Average
amount
of household
waste
collected
per head
nationally
in
2006/07
was
Waste
Strategy
2007
targets
include:
•
recycling
and
composting
of household
waste
– at
least 40%
by 2010, 4
5%
by 2015
and
50%
by 2020;
and
•
recovery
of municipal
waste
– 53%
by 2010,
67%
by 2015
and
75%
by
2020
Shows that total w
aste
produced
in
Darlington
Borough
decreased
by 3693.11
tonnes in
the
period
2006/09
Shows that the
proportion
of
waste
landfilled
decreased
over
the
period
2006/10, especially
in
the
last year.
Shows a
total decrease
of
9kg/head
over the
period
Waste
Data
Flow
Spreadsheet
Hub
data
https://www.hub.info4local.gov.uk/
DIHWEB/Homepage.aspx
(accessed
March
2010)
Audit Commission
Website
http://www.areaprofiles.audit
commission.gov.uk/(twnb0f34rbgi
bo55tke0pp55)/DataProfile.aspx?
entity=0
(accessed
May 2009)
43
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Waste
and
Minerals
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
548
(2004/05)
506
(2006/07)
NI191: Residual household
waste
per household
(kg)
824.69
(2006/07)
726
(2007/08)
Waste
recycled
(tonnes)
11537.22
(2006/07)
13261.82
(2007/08)
13138.38
(2008/09)
28342
(2009/10)
Waste
recycled
(%)
11.8
(2001/02)
13.4
(2003/04)
14.7
(2005/06)
26.6
(2006/07)
26.6
(2007/08)
29.3
(2008/09)
40.1
(2009/10)
Waste
composted
(%)
5.8%
(2006/07)
6.0%
(2007/08)
6.9%
(2008/09)
6.8%
(2009/10)
Take
up
of discounted
compost bins
68
sold
(2008/09)
Equates to
a diversion
of 10.2
tonnes from
landfill
NI192: %
of household
waste
sent for reuse, recycling
and
441kg
Not available
Not a
pplicable
Average
amount
of household
waste
recycled
nationally
in
2006/07
was
19.23%.
Average
amount
of household
waste
composted
nationally
in
2006/07
was
10.27%
75
Hartlepool
170
Middlesbrough
345
Redcar &
Cleveland
289
Stockton
Local targets:
NI193:
74%
(2008/09)
60%
(2009/10)
58%
(2010/11)
NI191:
No
local target set
NI 192:
26%
(2008/09)
40%
(2009/10)
42%
(2010/11)
As above
Not a
pplicable
As above
2000/07. Darlington
collected
65kg/head
more
than
the
national
average
in 2006/07
Shows a
decrease
of kg
waste
per household
of 98.69
Shows a
total increase
of 16805
tonnes recycled
over the
period
2006/10
Shows a
28.3
percentage
point
increase
in the
recycling
rate
over
the
period
2001/10. Darlington
was 3.21%
below
the
national
average
in 06/07
Shows an
1 percentage
point
increase
in the
composting
rate
over the
period
2006/10.
Darlington
was 3.58
percentage
points
below
the
national average
in
06/07
Hub
data
https://www.hub.info4local.gov.uk/
DIHWEB/Homepage.aspx
(accessed
March
2010)
Waste
Data
Flow
Spreadsheet
Audit Commission
Website
http://www.areaprofiles.audit
commission.gov.uk/(twnb0f34rbgi
bo55tke0pp55)/DetailPage.aspx?
entity=10004880
(accessed
May
2009)
Waste
Data
Flow
Spreadsheet
Audit Commission
Website
http://www.areaprofiles.audit
commission.gov.uk/(twnb0f34rbgi
bo55tke0pp55)/DetailPage.aspx?
entity=10004881
(accessed
May
2009)
Waste
Data
Flow
Spreadsheet
44
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Waste
and
Minerals
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
composting
22.71%
(2006/07)
24.67%
(2007/08)
26.89%
(2008/09)
Bring
site
contribution
%
4.9%
(2006/07)
5%
(2007/08)
4.8%
(2008/09)
Charity
collections
contribution
%
2.4%
(2006/07)
2.4%
(2007/08)
2.5%
(2008/09)
HWRC
contribution
%
51.8%
(2006/07)
46.9%
(2007/08)
49.29%
(2008/09)
Kerbside
contribution
%
41%
(2006/07)
38%
(2007/08)
36%
(2008/09)
% of household
waste
used
to
recover heat,
power and
other energy
sources
0%
(20012007)
Not a
vailable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
National
average
energy
from
waste
%
for 06/07
was
0.24%
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Government target of 10%
of electricity to
be
provided
by renewable
sources by
2010
with
the
aspiration
to
double
this
by 2020
Shows that there
was less take
up
of the
discounted
home
composting
scheme
in Darlington
than
the
rest of the
Tees Valley
Shows a
4.18%
increase
in the
overall reuse
and
recycling
rate
in
the
period
2006/09
Shows that Darlington’s
HWRC
followed
by the
kerbside
recycling
collection
service
contribute
the
most to
Darlington’s
overall
recycling
rate. H
owever there
was
a 2.5%
decline
in HWRC
contribution
and
a 5%
decline
in
Kerbside
contribution
over the
period
2006/09. T
he
bring
site
and
charity
collections contribute
a
relatively
steady %
to the
overall
recycling
rate
each
year
Not a
nticipated
to
change
Darlington
Borough
Council
Waste
Minimisation
and
Recycling
Officer
Waste
Data
Flow
Spreadsheet
Waste
Data
Flow
Spreadsheet
Waste
Data
Flow
Spreadsheet
Waste
Data
Flow
Spreadsheet
Waste
Data
Flow
Spreadsheet
Audit Commission
Website
http://www.areaprofiles.audit
commission.gov.uk/(twnb0f34rbgi
bo55tke0pp55)/DetailPage.aspx?
entity=10004882
(accessed
May
2009)
Minerals
* Number of developments
in
mineral safeguarding
areas
(2008):
Nil
Number of approved
minerals
developments
(2008):
Nil
Not a
pplicable
RSS
target for the
region
to
contribute
towards the
availability
of 26.25
million
tonnes of sand
and
gravel and
156
million
tonnes of crushed
rock between
20012021
in the
NE
region
No
quarrying
activity currently
takes place
in Darlington
Borough
Planning
and
Environmental
Policy Section
The
North
East of England
Regional S
patial S
trategy to
2021
45
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Waste
and
Minerals
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
To
enable
the
regional target
of supplying
76
million
tonnes
of alternative
(secondary
and
recycled) materials
Economy
and
Employment
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
VAT
registered
businesses
***
Total number of VAT
registered
businesses:
2,200
(2004)
2,290
(2005)
2,325
(2006)
2,410
(2007)
9.5%
improvement over the
period
2004
to
2007
in the
number of VAT
registered
businesses
NI171
new
businesses
registering
for VAT
and
PAYE
per 10, 000
resident
population:
40.70
(2006)
46.50
(2007)
46.80
(2008)
38
(2009)
Businesses deregistering
per
10,000
adult population
31
(2006)
34
(2007)
North
East:
9.5%
improvement over the
period
2004
to
2007
in the
number of VAT
registered
businesses
Great B
ritain: 7
.2%
improvement over the
period
2004
to
2007
in the
number of VAT
registered
businesses
North
East:
34
(2006)
41.9
(2007)
36.7
(2008)
31
(2009)
England:
54.8
(2006)
59.5
(2007)
57.2
(2008)
48
(2009)
North
East:
26
(2006)
28
(2007)
30
(2008)
35
(2009)
Not a
pplicable
No
local targets
set
Shows a
net increase
of 210
(9.5%)
businesses in
the
borough
over the
period
2004/07
This
% increase
is in
line
with
regional figures
and
exceeds National figures
Vat registrations in
Darlington
are
above
regional averages but significantly behind
the
national average
There
has been
a steady growth
in business
deregistrations over the
past four years.
NOMIS
website
–
https://www.nomisweb.
co.uk/reports/lmp/la/20
38432081/subreports/v
at_time_series/report.a
spx (2007) (accessed
March
2010)
Hub
data
https://www.hub.info4l
ocal.gov.uk/DIHWEB/
Homepage.aspx
(accessed
March
2010)
46
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Economy
and
Employment
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
37
(2008)
42
(2009)
Enterprise
births/deaths
as
a
proportion
of all
active
enterprises
Births: 9.8%
Deaths: 13.8%
England:
54.8
(2006)
59.5
(2007)
57.2
(2008)
48
(2009)
Enterprise
births/deaths
as
a proportion
of all
active
enterprises
Births: 9.6%(NE),
10.4
(England)
Deaths: 13.1%(NE),
13.1%
(England)
Darlington
has a
rate
of business births slightly
above
the
regional average, though
below
the
national average.
It has a
rate
of business deaths noticeably
higher than
the
regional and
national
averages.
Employment
by type
Darlington
residents
**
1 Managers, directors
and
senior officials
8.8%
2
Professional occupations
14.3%
3
Associate
professional &
technical 14.0%
4
Administrative
& secretarial
11.1%
5
Skilled
trades occupations
9.1%
6
Caring, leisure
and
Other
Service
occupations 8.9%
7
Sales and
customer service
occs 13.7%
8
Process plant &
machine
operatives 6.5%
9
Elementary
occupations
13.3%
1 Managers, directors
and
senior officials
8.2%
(NE),
10.0
(GB)
2 P
rofessional
occupations 16.4%
(NE),
19.2%
(GB)
3 A
ssociate
professional
& technical 13.2%
(NE),
14.0%
(GB)
4 A
dministrative
&
secretarial 11.1%
(NE),
11.1%
(GB)
5 S
killed
trades
occupations 11.3%
(NE),
10.8%
(GB)
6 C
aring, leisure
and
Other Service
occupations 9.4%
(NE),
9.1%
(GB)
7 S
ales and
customer
service
occs 10.0%
(NE),
8.1%
(GB)
Not a
pplicable
In
the
professions, skilled
trades and
caring/leisure/other services, D
arlington
has a
lower proportion
of its citizens employed
than
the
national and
regional averages.
In sales/customer service
and
elementary
occupations, it has a
higher proportion.
For the
remaining
types of employment the
proportion
of Darlington
citizens employed
is
somewhere
between
the
national and
regional
averages.
NOMIS
website
–
https://www.nomis
web.co.uk/reports/l
mp/la/2038432081
/report.aspx#tabva
t (2012) (accessed
Sep
2012)
47
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Economy
and
Employment
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
8
Process plant &
machine
operatives
7.8%
(NE),
6.4%
(GB)
9 E
lementary
occupations 12.3%
(NE),
10.9%
(GB)
Employment
by sector
People
who
work
in
Darlington
(2009)
Primary0.3%
Manufacturing7.7%
Construction10.2%
Distribution, hotels, b
ars
etc
32.9%
Finance5.8%
Public
sector27.8%
Other services15.4%
Primary1.8%
(NE),
2%
(G
B)
Manufacturing11.3%
(NE),
9%
(GB)
Construction6.1%
(NE),
4.8%
(GB)
Distribution, hotels, b
ars
etc27.9%
(NE),
31.3%
(G
B)
Finance4.2%
(NE),
5.5%
(G
B)
Public
sector33.3%
(NE),
28.2%
(GB)
Other services15.3%
(NE),
19.2%
(GB)
Not a
pplicable
People
who
work
in Darlington
are
more
likely
to
work
in construction, finance
or
distribution/hotels/bars
than
the
regional or
national averages.
They are
less likely
to work
in primary
industries, m
anufacturing, or the
public
sector.
While
the
statistics for employment in
Darlington
and
for employment of Darlington
residents
are
not d
irectly comparable, being
for
different years, they m
ay indicate
a number of
manufacturing
and
public
sector workers
living
in
Darlington
and
commuting
to work
elsewhere, and
a number of financial and
distribution/hotel/bar workers
commuting
into
Darlington.
Tees Valley Economic
Statistics brochure
http://www.teesvalleyu
nlim
ited.gov.uk/inform
ation
forecasting/documents
/economic_profile/eco
nomic%20profile%20fe
bruary%202011.pdf
Tourism
The
three
year average
revenue
for tourism
in
Darlington
for 19971999
was
£54.2
million
Hartlepool £25.6
million
Redcar and
Cleveland
£48.2
million
Stockton
£89
million
Middlesbrough
£98.5
million
Not a
pplicable
A
Tourism
Strategy for
the
Tees Valley (2003)
http://www.teesvalleyp
artnership.co.uk/pdf/str
ategic_documents/TV
Ptourism
strategy.PDF
Employment
land
availability
*
Existing
supply: 343.ha
Anticipated
demand
2009
2026: 101.5
ha
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Shows an
over supply
of employment land
to
meet need
Darlington
Employment Land
Review
(2009)
http://www.darlington.g
ov.uk/Generic/Search
Results.htm
?q=employ
48
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Economy
and
Employment
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
ment+land+review
Retail
***
Distribution
of shopping
floorspace
(A1):
Town
centre
42%
Town
centre
fringe
6%
District and
local centres –
15%
Out of town
– 26%
Local shops outside
centres –
10%
Percentage
of shopping
floorspace
vacant
Town
centre–
8%
Town
centre
fringe
– 18%
District centres –
3%
Out of town
– 7%
Local shops outside
centres
8%
Not a
pplicable
Target should
be
to protect the
viability
of the
town
centre
Shows that the
town
centre
has the
greatest
percentage
of shopping
floorspace
followed
by
out of town
centres
Shows that the
town
centre
fringe
has m
uch
the
worst shop
vacancy rate, followed
by the
town
centre
and
local shops.
Statistical update
to
Darlington
Retail Study
2008
(2010)
http://www.darlington.g
ov.uk/dar_public/docu
ments/Development%
20and%20Environmen
t/Development%
20and
%20Regeneration/Pla
nning%20Services/Poli
cy/Studies/Shopping%
20Floorspace%20in%
20Dton%20Update.pdf
Working
age
population
(years)
***
Borough
residents
Darlington:
Population
aged
1664:
63.1
(2009/10)
Population
aged
1664:
that are
economically
active:
75.1%
(2009/10)
(Men: 82%, W
omen: 69.2%
in
09/10, 6
8.4%
in 11/12)
Population
aged
1664:
in employment:
68.6%
(2009/10)
Great B
ritain: Population
1664:
64.8%
(2009/10)
76.5%
of the
population
nationally
between
age
1664
are
economically
active
70.2%
of the
population
nationally
between
age
1664
are
in employment
(70.2%
in 09/10)
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
The
percentage
of Darlington’s
population
who
are
of working
age
is 1.7
percentage
points
below
the
national average, and
decreasing
faster than
the
national average
is.
Darlington
is 1.4
percentage
points
behind
the
national average
for %
of 1664s who
are
economically
activea
drop
of nearly a
whole
percentage
point o
ver the
last two
years
while
the
national average
has remained
the
same.
Most of the
percentage
loss to
this
category
is
accounted
for by women.
Darlington
is 2.4
percentage
points
below
the
national average
for %
of 1664
year olds in
employmenta
drop
of nearly a
whole
NOMIS
website
–
https://www.nomisweb.
co.uk/reports/lmp/la/20
38432081/report.aspx
?town=Darlington
(accessed
Sep
2012)
Darlington
Borough
Council Corporate
Plan
20082012
49
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Economy
and
Employment
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
67.8%
(2011/12)
Unemployment rate
(overall,
model based):
5.3%
(2006/07)
6.0%
(2007/08)
7.1%
(2008/09)
9.2%
(2009/10)
8.4%
(2010/11)
10.2%
(2011/12)
Unemployment rate
(male)
3.2%
(2006/07)
7.7%
(2007/08)
5.9%
(2008/09)
11.9%
(2009/10)
7.3%
(2010/11)
12.4%
(2011/12)
Unemployment rate
(female)
3.8%
(2006/07)
4.4%
(2007/08)
6.3%
(2008/09)
5.7%
(2009/10)
4.8%
(2010/11)
6.3%
(2011/12)
Great Britain
Unemployment rate:
5.4%
(2006/07)
5.2%
(2007/08)
6.2%
(2008/09)
7.9%
(2009/10)
7.6%
(2010/11)
8.1%
(2011/12)
Unemployment (m
ale)
5.8%
(2006/07)
5.4%
(2007/08)
6.7%
(2008/09)
8.9%
(2009/10)
8.4%
(2010/11)
8.7%
(2011/12)
Unemployment (female)
4.9%
(2006/07)
4.9%
(2007/08)
5.6%
(2008/09)
6.7%
(2009/10)
6.7%
(2010/11)
7.4%
(2011/12)
Target should
be
to have
as
few
people
unemployed
as possible
percentage
point o
ver the
last two
years
while
the
national average
has remained
the
same.
Figures are
now
for population
aged
1664,
rather than
population
‘of working
age’.
The
unemployment rate
has increased
even
more
severely
in Darlington
than
in Great
Britain
as a
whole, n
early doubling
since
before
the
depression, and
continuing
to
get
worse.
Whilst six
years
ago
Darlington
had
an
unemployment rate
0.1%
below
the
national
average, it is
now
1.9%
above.
In Darlington
the
male
unemployment rate
has
fluctuated
but overall has now
increased
to
nearly double
the
female
unemployment rate.
The
male
unemployment rate
in th
e Borough
is
now
significantly above
the
national equivalent
figure, whereas the
female
unemployment rate
is
below
it.
People
employed
or
business
owners/
proprietors
etc. in
the
area
***
Darlington
borough
Change
20082009
11%
North
East
Change
20082009
4.3%
Great B
ritain:
Change
20082009
2.3%
The
number of jobs in
Darlington
borough
decreased
very
severely
between
2008
and
2009as a
percentage, it was over twice
the
regional loss and
over four times the
national
loss.
Tees Valley Economic
Statistics brochure
http://www.teesvalleyu
nlim
ited.gov.uk/inform
ation
forecasting/documents
/economic_profile/eco
nomic%20profile%20fe
bruary%202011.pdf
Out of work
Jobseeker allowance
Great B
ritain:
Target should
Shows that the
% of JSA
claimants
has
NOMIS
website
–
50
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Economy
and
Employment
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
benefits
claimants
***
claimants
only
(each
April):
2.9%
(2007)
2.8%
(2008)
5.1%
(2009)
5.0%
(2010)
5.0%
(2011)
5.8%
(2012)
JSA
claimants
of each
gender (2012):
Male: 7.7%
Female: 3.6%
% of people
in each
age
bracket claiming
JSA
(2012):
12.6%
(aged
1824)
5.8%
(aged
2549)
2.9%
(aged
5064)
JSA
claimants
by
duration
(2011):
Up
to 6
months: 72.8%
(2011),
51.9%
(2012)
6 –
12
months: 15.3%
(2011),
21.1%
(2012)
Over 12
months: 11.9%
(2011),
26.9%
(2012)
Percentage
of people
aged
1664
on
key
outofwork
benefits:
4.0%
(2012)
NE
region:
5.5%
(2012)
Great B
ritain
Male: 5.0%
Female: 2.7%
Great B
ritain:
7.5%
(aged
1824)
4.0%
(aged
2549)
2.2%
(aged
50+)
NE
region:
10.4%
(aged
1824)
5.7%
(aged
2549)
2.8%
(aged
50+)
2011
figures:
Great B
ritain:
68.5%
(up
to
6 m
onths)
16.3%
(612
months)
15.2%
(over 12
months)
NE
region:
70.1%
(up
to
6 m
onths)
17.5%
(612
months)
12.5%
(over 12
months)
Great B
ritain
be
to have
as
few
people
as
possible
claiming
Jobseeker’s
Allowance
doubled
since
2007. D
arlington
claimants
are
now
more
numerous than
at the
regional level
and
well above
the
national level.
Over two
thirds of JSA
claimants
in Darlington
are
men. T
his
difference
is less pronounced
at
the
national scale.
Shows that the
age
group
with
the
highest
proportion
of JSA
claimants
is 1824
year olds,
with
5064
year olds least likely
to claim
JSA.
This
repeats
the
pattern
of the
national and
regional figures.
Shows that a
slim
majority
of JSA
claimants
in
Darlington
have
been
claiming
for less than
6
months. T
his
figure
has worsened
significantly
over the
last year,
with
big
increases in
the
proportion
of medium
and
long
term
JSA
claimants. A
lthough
1824
year olds are
most
likely
to be
JSA
claimants, claimants
of that
age
are
most likely
to be
short
term
whilst
older claimants
are
now
most likely
to have
been
claiming
for 6
months or more.
Shows that the
% of people
claiming
JSA
and
https://www.nomisweb.
co.uk/reports/lmp/la/20
38432081/report.aspx
?town=Darlington
(accessed
Feb
2011)
51
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Economy
and
Employment
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
14.2%
(Feb
2007)
13.9%
(Feb
2008)
15.8%
(Feb
2009)
15.8%
(Feb
2010)
15.2%
(Feb
2011)
15.6%
(Feb
2012)
11.6%
(Feb
2007)
11.1%
(Feb
2008)
12.6%
(Feb
2009)
12.8%
(Feb
2010)
12.3%
(Feb
2011)
12.5%
(Feb
2012)
No
local targets
set
other worklessness related
benefits
has
increased
over the
period
by 1.4
percentage
points, and
remains significantly higher than
the
national figure.
Workless
households
***
18.7%: Households with
no
one
working
18.9%: Dependents
in
workless households
21.2%: Families with
noone
working
25.2%: Children
in workless
families
55.1%
Lone
parents
in work
Tees Valley Unlim
ited
ward
data:
http://www.teesvalleyu
nlim
ited.gov.uk/inform
ationforecasting/docu
ments/place/warddata.
xls
(accessed
July
2010)
Earnings
***
NI166: A
verage
earnings of
employees in
the
area:
£372.00
(2006)
£431.10
(2007)
£440.10
(2008)
£431.60
(2009)
£440.50
(2010)
£448.30
(2011)
North
East gross weekly
pay:
£451.80
(2011)
National gross weekly
pay:
£502.6
(2011)
Local T
argets:
£415
(08/09)
£427
(09/10)
£446
(10/11)
£466
(11/12)
Average
earnings have
increased
by £76.30
per week between
2006
and
2011. However
they dropped
back sharply
between
2008
and
2009. T
his
led
to them
being
overtaken
by the
regional average
earnings, which
have
grown
steadily, a
nd
failing
to m
eet the
local targets
for the
last few
years.
https://www.nomis
web.co.uk/reports/l
mp/la/2038432081
/report.aspx#tabva
t (accessed
Sep
2012)
Darlington
Borough
Council Corporate
Plan
20082012
Education
and
skills
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Total number
of schools
(with
breakdown
of
subscription)
***
Nurseries
10
Infant and
Junior –
2
Oversubscribed
– 2
Primary
– 25
Oversubscribed
– 17
Secondary
– 7
Not applicable
Not a
pplicable
The
total number of schools
may
change
over time
in the
Borough.
2009
application
levels
show
that
Most of the
Borough’s
infant and
junior and
primary
schools
are
oversubscribed. O
nly
one
primary
and
one
secondary
school received
fewer
applications than
they had
places.
Primary
School A
dmissions Guide
2011/12
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Childrens%20Services
/Schools/Admissions/Primary.pdf
(accessed
Feb
2011)
Secondary
School A
dmissions Guide
2009/10
52
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Education
and
skills
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Oversubscribed
– 3
Private
Schools
– 3
Colleges
2
Demand
outweighs supply.
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Childrens%20Services
/Schools/Admissions/Secondary.pdf
(accessed
Feb
2011)
16
year olds
achieving
5
A* to
C
grades
including
Maths and
English
***
NI75: Achievement of 5
or
more
A* C
grades at
GCSE
including
English
and
Maths
51.8%
(2009)
54.7%
(2010)
65.7%
(2011)
North
East:
48.1%
(2009)
52.8%
(2010)
56.8%
(2011)
England:
49.8%
(2009)
53.5%
(2010)
58.9%
(2011)
National:
53%
to achieve
5 A*
C GCSE
grades by
2011
Local Targets:
50.2%
(08/09)
58.7%
(09/10)
59.2%
(10/11)
Shows year on
year improvement.
Achievements
in Darlington
are
above
the
national and
regional %
and
exceed
local targets
Darlington
LIS
http://lis.darlington.gov.uk/profiles/pro
file?profileId=27&geoTypeId=19&geo
Ids=E06000005
(accessed
Sep
2012)
Darlington
Borough
Council
Corporate
Plan
20082012
16
to 18
year
olds who
are
not in
education,
training
or
employment
***
NI 117: N
EET
3.70%
(2006/07)
7.50%
(2007/08)
6.90%
(2008/09)
North
East:
9.8%
(2008/09)
England:
6.7%
(2008/09)
Local T
argets:
6.40%
(2008/09)
6.20%
(2009/10)
5.70%
(2010/11)
5.70%
(2011/12)
Shows an
86%
increase
in the
%
of 16
to 18
year olds who
are
not
in education
or training
over the
2006
to
2009
period. H
owever,
there
has been
a slight reduction
in
NEET’s
between
2007/08
and
2008/09. The
2008/09
local target
was m
issed
by 0.5%
Darlington’s
level of NEET
in
2007/08
was below
the
regional
average
but above
the
national
average
Hub
data
https://www.hub.info4local.gov.uk/DI
HWEB/Homepage.aspx (accessed
March
2010
Darlington
Borough
Council
Corporate
Plan
20082012
Qualifications
(population
aged
1664)
**
No
qualifications –
20.6%
(2005)
14.8%
(2006)
12.2%
(2007)
13.3%
(2008)
13.0%
(2009)
11.5%
(2010)
2010
figures
NVQ1
and
above: 82.1%
NVQ2
and
above: 69.2%
No
qualifications:
North
East:
14.8%
(2009)
England:
12.3%
(2009)
NVQ4
and
above:
North
East:
25.5%
(2010)
Great B
ritain:
31.3%
(2010)
Target should
be
to
reduce
the
% of
working
age
population
who
have
no
qualifications
The
% of working
age
population
without qualifications has
decreased
significantly since
2005. H
owever,
after briefly being
better than
the
national average
it
has now
fallen
behind
again.
The
proportion
of people
with
qualfications at the
level of NVQ4
or above
is significantly higher
than
the
North
East average,
NOMIS
website
https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/reports/l
mp/la/2038432081/subreports/quals_
time_series/report.aspx (accessed
Feb
2011)
Darlington
LIS:
http://lis.darlington.gov.uk/profiles/pro
file?profileId=32&geoTypeId=19&geo
Ids=E06000005
(accessed
Sep
2012)
53
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Education
and
skills
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
NVQ3
and
above: 51.8%
NVQ4
and
above: 30.8%
though
slightly lower than
the
national average.
Skills
***
NI174: S
kills gaps in
the
current workforce
reported
by employers
25.40%
(2006/07)
22.10%
(2007/08)
North
East:
21%
(2007/08)
National:
16%
(2007/08)
Target should
be
to
reduce
the
skills gap
The
skills gap
in Darlington
is
decreasing. H
owever,
the
gap
is
greater than
the
regional and
national averages.
Hub
data
https://www.hub.info4local.gov.uk/DI
HWEB/Homepage.aspx (accessed
March
2010
Learning
and
Skills Council:
North
East R
egional S
trategic
Analysis
2007/08
http://readingroom.lsc.gov.uk/lsc/Nort
hEast/ner
regionalstrategicanalysis200708br
11jan2007.pdf (accessed
May 2009)
Transport
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Access to
services
*
NI175: A
ccess to
services
and
facilities by public
transport, walking
and
cycling
94%
(2008/09)
Not available
Local Targets:
08/09
– 94%
09/10
– 94%
10/11
– 94%
Shows that the
majority
of the
population
are
able
to
access
services without the
use
of a
car.
Local targets
have
been
met
Hub
data
stored
at
http://www.places.communities.gov.u
k/NewsPages/News_Documents/Hub
DownloadOct2010.xls
Darlington
Borough
Council
Corporate
Plan
20082012
Vehicle
ownership
**
Darlington
No
vehicle: 31.24%
1
vehicle: 45.2%
2
vehicles: 1
9.6%
3
vehicles: 3%
4
or more
vehicles: 0.8%
NE
No
vehicle: 35.9%
1
vehicle: 43%
2
vehicles: 1
7%
3
vehicles 2.7
4+
vehicles: 0.7%
UK
No
vehicle: 26.8%
1
vehicle: 43.6%
2
vehicles: 2
3.5%
3
vehicles: 4.5%
Not a
pplicable
Shows that less households in
Darlington
are
without a
vehicle
than
the
North
East and
UK
averages. Also
shows that
Darlington
households have
a
greater percentage
of vehicle
ownership
than
the
regional
average. T
his
level of ownership
is
slightly below
the
UK
average
in
relation
to
2, 3
and
4 or more
vehicles.
ONS
Car or Van
http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.g
ov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.
do?a=3&b=276816&c=Darlington&d=
13&e=15&g=387623&i=1001x1003x
1004&m=0&r=1&s=1242911087328
&enc=1&dsFamilyId=51
(updated
March
2007) (accessed
October
2009)
54
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
4+
vehicles: 1.3%
Number of
cars
owned
***
42,200
(2004)
44,000
(2008)
Not available
Not a
pplicable
Shows an
increase
of 1,800
cars
owned
in th
e Borough
over a
4
year period. T
his
is a
total
increase
of 4%
Darlington
– Sustainable
Travel
Demonstration
Town
– Travel
behaviour research
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Localmotion/Local_Mo
tion_in_Darlington_final_report_FINA
L_DRAFT_UPDATED.pdf (M
ar 2009)
Car Mileage
* Total kilometres per year
(everyday days) in
millions
355.4
(2004)
321.1
(2008)
Not available
Not a
pplicable
Shows a
reduction
of 34.3
million
km
per year
Darlington
– Sustainable
Travel
Demonstration
Town
– Travel
behaviour research
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Localmotion/Local_Mo
tion_in_Darlington_final_report_FINA
L_DRAFT_UPDATED.pdf (M
arch
2009)
% change
in
transport
mode
choice
(20042008)
*
Walk
– plus 4%
Bicycle
– plus 2%
Motorcycle
– no
change
Car as driver –
minus 4%
Car as passenger –
minus
2%
Bus –
no
change
Other public
transport
– no
change
Not a
pplicable
Target should
be
to
increase
the
%
change
towards
more
sustainable
transport
means
The
Local M
otion
project h
as
increased
walking
and
cycling
and
reduced
car use
in th
e to
wn. T
he
project has not influenced
the
use
of public
transport
Darlington
– Sustainable
Travel
Demonstration
Town
– Travel
behaviour research
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Localmotion/Local_Mo
tion_in_Darlington_final_report_FINA
L_DRAFT_UPDATED.pdf (M
arch
2009)
Reasons for
travel
2008
Work: 20%
Work
related
business: 2%
Education: 1
0%
Shopping: 23%
Personal business: 4%
Escort: 10%
Leisure: 31%
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Shopping
and
leisure
are
the
largest trip
generators, accounting
for over half (54%) of all trips in
the
Borough
Darlington
– Sustainable
Travel
Demonstration
Town
– Travel
behaviour research
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Localmotion/Local_Mo
tion_in_Darlington_final_report_FINA
L_DRAFT_UPDATED.pdf (M
arch
2009)
LTP
area
wide
traffic
flows
*
851
(2003)
849
(2004)
860
(2005)
874
(2006)
872
(2007)
Not a
pplicable
Target should
be
for
traffic
flows not to
exceed
TEMPRO
growth
projections of
8.6%
Shows that traffic
flows have
increased
by just 2.5%
between
2003
and
2007. T
his
is well below
TEMPRO
projections
Darlington: A
Town
on
the
Move.
Second
Local Transport
Plan
Delivery
Report
2008
Cycling
trips
Trips per person
and
year:
Not a
pplicable
Target should
be
to
Shows an
increase
of 19
cycling
Darlington
– Sustainable
Travel
55
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
14
(2004)
33
(2008)
% of people
using
a bicycle
per day
2%
(2004)
5%
(2008)
increase
cycling
trips
and
the
% of people
using
a bicycle
per
day
trips per person
per year and
a
3%
increase
in th
e %
of people
using
a bicycle
to travel
Demonstration
Town
– Travel
behaviour research
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Localmotion/Local_Mo
tion_in_Darlington_final_report_FINA
L_DRAFT_UPDATED.pdf (M
arch
2009)
% of trips that
are
walk
trips
*
29%
(2009)
Not a
pplicable
27%
LTP2
target
Shows that the
% of walk
trips are
ahead
of target
DBC
– Transport
Policy Team
Children
travelling
to
school –
mode
of
transport
usually
used
*
NI 198
(Aged
515)
Car including
vans
and
taxis
22.6%
(06/07)
26.1.3B%
(07/08)
21.3%
(08/09)
Car share
2.4%
(06/07)
6.1.3C%
(07/08)
3.1%
(08/09)
Public
transport
16.6%
(06/07)
16.0%
(07/08)
15.7%
(08/09)
Walking
55.4%
(06/07)
55.1%
(07/08)
56.5%
(08/09)
Cycling
6.1.3C%
(06/07)
6.1.3C%
(07/08)
3.0%
(08/09)
Other
0.2%
(06/07)
0.3%
(07/08)
0.5%
(08/09)
Not available
Children
travelling
to
school m
ode
of
transport
usually
used
(car)
21.8%
(2009)
20.8%
(2010)
19.8%
(2011)
Shows that a
greater %
of
children
walk
to
school than
any
other mode
of transport
and
this
is
increasing
slightly. O
ther
increases include
a slight
increase
in cycling, car sharing
and
other modes. S
hows a
decrease
in use
of cars
(including
vans and
taxis) which
slightly
exceeds targets
and
a decrease
in
use
of public
transport
modes
DBC
Transport
Policy
Number or %
36
out of 44
schools
have
a
Not a
pplicable
Target for all schools
Shows that DBC
is on
target to
DBC
Transport
Policy
56
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
of schools
with
school
travel plans
*
travel plan
(82%) This
figure
includes private
schools
to
have
a travel plan
by 31/03/10
meet its
100%
target for 31/03/10.
2 out of the
4 private
schools
are
currently progressing
a plan
% of rights
of
way that are
easy to
use
by the
public
***
72.5%
(2008)
75%
(2009)
63%
(2012)
Not a
pplicable
Target should
be
for
100%
of rights
of
way to
be
easy to
use
Decrease
of nine
percentage
points
in the
last four years
from
a
figure
that was already
significantly under target.
DBC
Countryside
Team
Usage
of the
PROW
network
***
Footpaths –
280km
Bridleways –
66km
Byways –
0.13km
•
30km
are
located
within
the
town
of Darlington
itself.
•
45%
of the
population
say that they use
the
network
either never or
very
occasionally
•
20%
say that they use
the
network
once
a
month
•
35%
are
regular users
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
The
% of the
population
using
the
Darlington
countryside
as a
place
for quality walking, cycling
or
riding
is very
low
– less than
5%
of the
population
Only
9%
of paths are
judged
to be
of a
very
high
quality and
have
a
high
level of usage.
Further surveys will
identify
whether this
trend
is im
proving
or
worsening
Darlington’s
Right of W
ay
Improvement P
lan
–
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Development%
20and
%20Environment/Countryside/ROWI
P%20summary%201.pdf (accessed
November 2009)
Increase
in
PROW
and
cycle
routes
Increase
of 2.3km
bridleways (20042009)
Increase
of 1km
footpaths
(20042009)
Cycle
paths
20
– 41km
(20052009)
Not available
No
local target set
Slight increase
in bridleway and
footpath
length. H
owever,
good
increase
in cycle
paths due
to
Cycle
Demonstration
Town
Project
DBC
Countryside
Team
Cycle
Town
Review
2005/2009
Rail
patronage
*
Increase
of 25.9%
(2003/04
2007/08
Not available
Not a
pplicable
Rail patronage
is im
proving
which
coincides with
improvements
to
railw
ay stations in
the
Borough
Second
Local Transport
Plan
Delivery
Report
2008
Bus
10.069
(03/04)
Not available
10.0691
(03/04)
Bus patronage
has declined
by
Darlington: A
Town
on
the
Move.
57
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
passenger
journeys
(thousands)
***
9.591
(04/05)
8.780
(05/06)
8.830
(06/07)
8.614
(07/08)
8,366
(08/09)
8,277
(09/10)
8,265
(10/11)
9.591
(04/05)
9.150
(05/06)
8.920
(06/07)
8.740
(07/08)
1.792
million
trips between
2003
and
2008. T
his
decline
is
anticipated
with
an
increase
in car
ownership
and
second
car
ownership. H
owever the
rate
of
decline
is greater than
the
local
targets
set.
The
decline
has
slowed
over the
last few
years
in
comparison
with
the
mid
2000s.
Second
Local Transport
Plan
Delivery
Report
2008
2010/12
AMR
Transport
related
satisfaction
levels
**
Satisfaction
with
road
maintenance
and
repairs:
33.8%
(2008)
38.6%
(2009)
Satisfaction
with
local
transport
information:
N/A
(2008)
40.9%
(2009)
Satisfaction
with
local bus
services
N/A
(2008)
44.9%
(2009)
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Satisfaction
with
road
maintenance
and
repairs has
increased, but the
majority
of
respondents
(61.4%) claimed
to
be
dissatisfied
40.9%
of respondents
are
satisfied
with
local transport
inform
ation. H
owever,
more
than
half (59.1%) are
dissatisfied
44.9%
of respondents
are
satisfied
with
local bus services.
However,
more
than
half (55.1%)
are
dissatisfied
Darlington
Borough
Council
Community Survey
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Democr
acy/Statistics+and+Surveys/Commun
itySurvey.htm
(accessed
November
2009)
Bus services
running
on
time
**
NI 178
Proportion
running
on
time
66%
(2009)
58%
(2010)
Excess waiting
time
for
frequent services:
1.63
minutes (2008/09)
2.22
minutes (2009/10)
Not available
75%
(08/09)
77.5%
(09/10)
80%
(10/11)
82.5%
(11/12)
Bus punctuality got worse
between
2009
and
2010. T
he
most recent local target was
missed
by 19.5
percentage
points.
Hub
Data
https://www.hub.info4local.gov.uk/DI
HWEB/Homepage.aspx (accessed
Feb
2011)
Darlington
Borough
Council
Corporate
Plan
20082012
Darlington’s
Community: Background
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Size
of the
borough
196.8km
2
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
ONS
Region
in Figures
Population
Density
4.95
(2001)
5.06
(Mid
2007)
England:
3.77
(2001)
Not a
pplicable
Shows that population
density
has increased
in Darlington.
ONS
population
density
http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.g
58
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Darlington’s
Community: Background
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
(people
per
hectare)
5.08
(Mid2009)
3.92
(Mid
2007)
Darlington’s
density per
hectare
is 2
people
more
than
the
regional average
and
1
person
more
than
the
national
average.
ov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.
do?a=3&b=276816&c=Darlington&d=
13&e=13&g=387623&i=1001x1003x
1004&m=0&r=1&s=1243424996839
&enc=1&dsFamilyId=789
(accessed
March
2010)
ONS
Mid
2009
population
figures
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/
Product.asp?vlnk=15106
(accessed
Feb
2011)
Total resident
population
***
97,938
(2001)
105,564
(2011)
n/a
Not a
pplicable
Shows a
sharp
population
increase
of 7.8%
in th
e last 10
yearsthe
biggest percentage
increase
in the
North
East,
and
one
of the
ten
biggest in
the
North
of Englandafter a
decline
in the
1990s.
2011
census results
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publicatio
ns/rereference
tables.htm
l?edition=tcm%3A77
274670
Urban
/ Rural
population
Darlington
town
– 87%
Darlington
surrounds –
13%
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Shows that the
majority
of the
population
lives in
Darlington
town
Sustainable
Community Strategy
One
Darlington: P
erfectly Placed
(20082021)
Ageing
population
***
% change
in Darlington’s
population
between
2004
and
2025
014
years
– m
inus 1.9%
1524
years
– m
inus 1.4%
2564
years
– m
inus 1.9%
6574
years
– plus 1.4%
7584
years
– plus 1.6%
85+
plus 1.2%
2011
census
09
years: 12.0%
1019
years: 12.0%
2029
years: 12.1%
3039
years: 12.6%
09: 11.0%
(NE) 11.9%
(Eng)
1019: 12.1%
(NE) 12.1%
(Eng)
2029: 13.4%
(NE) 13.7%
(Eng)
3039: 11.9%
(NE) 13.3
(Eng)
Not a
pplicable
Projections show
a decrease
in
those
aged
0 to
64
of 5.2%
and
an
increase
in those
aged
65
to 85+
of 4.2%. Indicates
that the
population
is ageing
with
the
greatest increase
in
those
aged
7584.
Population
pyramid
shows that
as for the
regional and
national
levels, the
most populous age
bracket is that of people
in
their
forties. C
ompared
to the
regional level D
arlington
has a
higher proportion
of under10s.
Compared
to th
e national level
NHS
Darlington: Joint Strategic
Needs Assessment 2008
Census 2011
data
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/interactive
/vp22011census
comparator/index.htm
l
59
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Darlington’s
Community: Background
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
4049
years: 14.8%
5059
years: 12.9%
6069
years: 11.2%
7079
years: 7.7%
8089
years: 4.1%
90+
years: 0.8%
(Figure
may not add
up
exactly due
to rounding)
4049: 14.6%
(NE) 14.6%
(Eng)
5059: 13.2%
(NE) 12.1%
(Eng)
6069: 11.4%
(NE) 10.7%
(Eng)
7079: 7.8%
(NE) 7.0%
(Eng)
8089: 3.9%
(NE) 3.9%
(Eng)
90+: 0.7%
(NE) 0.8%
(Eng)
it has a
lower proportion
of
people
in their
twenties and
thirties.
Predicted
resident
population
**
101,200
(2011)
103,200
(2016)
105,500
(2021)
107,400
(2025)
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Showed
that the
resident
population
will
increase
by
6,200
up
to
2025. T
he
great
majority
of the
increase
was
expected
to
come
from
natural
change.
(These
projections were
made
before
the
2011
census data
emerged, w
hich
shows a
significantly higher starting
figure)
TVU
Darlington
Population
Projections
https://www.teesvalleyunlim
ite
d.gov.uk/m
edia/101556/darling
ton_population_projections_20
10_based.pdf
Migration
(2001)
**
Moves into
Darlington:
11,100
Moves out of Darlington:
10,800
Main
gaining
wards:
Middleton
St G
eorge
Main
Losing
Wards:
Eastbourne
Haughton
North
Northgate
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Shows that 300
more
residents
moved
into
Darlington
than
out
in 2001
Tees Valley Joint S
trategy Unit
http://www.teesvalley
jsu.gov.uk/old/tvstats/index.htm
(accessed
May 2009)
Racial P
rofile
97.86%
White
0.38%
Chinese/Other
ethnic
group
0.48%
Mixed
race
England:
94.06%
White
0.7%
Chinese/Other Ethnic
Groups
Not a
pplicable
The
proportions of all non
white
ethnic
groups within
the
Borough
are
lower than
for
England
as a
whole.
ONS
Census Ethnic
Group
(2001)
http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.g
ov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.
do?a=3&b=276816&c=Darlington&d=
60
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Darlington’s
Community: Background
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
0.93%
Asian/Asian
British
0.22%
Black/Black British
1.01%
Mixed
Race
6.1.3B7%
Asian/Asian
British
1.36%
Black/Black British
13&e=15&g=387623&i=1001x1003x
1004&m=0&r=1&s=1243516647390
&enc=1&dsFamilyId=47
(accessed
May 2009)
Deprivation
***
Darlington
has 63
LSOA
Worst 3%
nationally: 5
(form
erly 2)
Rank: 974
or below
Worst 10%
nationally: 10
(form
erly 7)
Rank: 3248
or below
Best 10%
nationally: 2
(form
erly 2)
Rank: 29,233
or above
Best 20%
nationally: 1
2
(form
erly 11)
Rank 25,985
or above
Not a
pplicable
Target should
be
to decrease
the
number of
LSOA’s
in th
e
worst 3%
and
10%
Shows that there
is a
large
gap
between
those
that live
in the
most deprived
and
least
deprived
areas. T
he
gap
is
widening, m
ainly
at the
expense
of the
more
deprived
areas.
Indices of Multiple
Deprivation
(2010)
http://www.communities.gov.uk/com
munities/neighbourhoodrenewal/depr
ivation/deprivation07/ (accessed
May
2009)
Stronger Communities
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Social
integration
*
NI1: %
of people
who
believe
people
from
different
backgrounds get on
well
together in
their
local area:
79%
(2006/07)
80%
(2008/09)
England:
76.4
(2008/09)
North
East:
73.8
(2008/09)
Not a
vailable
Shows a
slight improvement in
perceptions of social integration.
The
majority
of respondents
feel
that people
from
different
backgrounds do
get on
well
together in
Darlington
Hub
data
https://www.hub.info4local.gov.uk/DI
HWEB/Homepage.aspx (accessed
March
2010
Influence
**
NI4: %
of people
who
feel
they can
influence
decisions
in their
locality:
29%
(2006/07)
29.7%
(2008/09)
England:
28.9
(2008/09)
North
East:
28
(2008/09)
Local Targets:
31%
(2008/09)
33%
(2009/10)
35%
(2010/11)
37%
(2011/12)
Shows a
1%
increase
in the
perceptions of social influence.
However this
does not m
eet the
2008/09
target and
overall the
majority
of respondents
70%
feel
that they can
not influence
Darlington
Borough
Council Policy
Department
Darlington
Borough
Council
Corporate
Plan
20082012
61
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Stronger Communities
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
decisions
Involvement –
election
turnout
**
Local election
(2007):
40.51%
General election
(2010):
62.93%
(Darlington
constituency)
62.14%
(Sedgefield
constituency)
UK
(2010
General
elections):
65.11%
North
East E
ngland
(2010
General
elections):
61.08%
The
target should
be
to
increase
the
turnout
Darlington
town
below
the
national election
turnout b
y 1.18%
Darlington
Borough
Council
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Democr
acy/Democracy/elections/local/Local
+Elections.htm
Electoral C
ommission
http://www.electoralcommission.org.u
k/elections/results
Satisfaction
**
NI5: O
verall general
satisfaction
with
local area:
76%
(2006/07)
79%
(2008/09)
79%
(2009/10)
England:
79.7
(2008/09)
North
East:
77.3
(2008/09)
Local Targets:
80%
(2008/09)
81%
(2009/10)
82%
(2010/11)
83%
(2011/12)
Shows that the
majority
of
respondents
are
satisfied
with
Darlington
as a
place
to
live
and
that this
has im
proved
slowly.
However,
the
83%
target for
09/10
was not m
et.
DBC
AMR
2009/10
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Development%
20and
%20Environment/Development%
20a
nd%20Regeneration/Planning%20Se
rvices/Policy/AMR_200910_FINAL_D
OCUMENT_App_1_separate.pdf
Darlington
Borough
Council
Corporate
Plan
20082012
Older persons
satisfaction
*
NI138: Satisfaction
of
people
over 65
with
both
home
and
neighbourhood:
76%
(2006/07)
83.3%
(2007/08)
83.6%
(2008/09)
Not available
Not set
Shows that the
majority
of older
persons are
satisfied
with
Darlington
as a
place
to
live
and
that this
is im
proving
Darlington
Borough
Council Policy
Department
Safer Communities
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Crime
rate
***
75.3
(2005/06)
77.5
(2006/07)
59.2
(2007/08)
51.5
(2008/09)
47.1
(2009/10)
42.6
(2010/11)
Not a
pplicable
Shows that the
crime
rate
in
Darlington
has decreased
by 32.7
percentage
points
over the
period
05/06
to 10/11.
Floors
Interactive
Website
–
http://www.fti.communities.gov.uk/fti/
Comparisons.aspx (accessed
March
2010)
Actual crime
11,701
(05/06)
9,057
(08/09)
Not available
Not a
vailable
Shows a
reduction
of 22.6%
in
incidents
of crime
in the
period
(05/09)
Durham
Constabulary
Incidents
of
Urban
Wards –
8,402
(08/09)
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Shows a
higher level of crime
in
Darlington
Borough
Council,
Safer
62
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Safer Communities
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
crime
at ward
level
Rural W
ards –
677
(08/09)
Breakdown
of urban
area
Deprived
wards (including
town
centre) –
5196
(08/09)
Town
Centre
– 1598
(30%)
Nondeprived
wards –
3883
(08/09)
urban
wards as opposed
to rural
wards
Within
the
urban
wards crime
levels
are
greatest within
the
town
centre
overall.
Generally, crime
levels
are
higher
in the
most deprived
wards as
opposed
to lesser deprived
wards
within
the
urban
area
Communities Advisor
Fear of crime
**
% of residents
surveyed
feeling
safe
whilst o
utside
at
night:
36.9%
(2002/03)
51.8%
(2003/04)
48.3%
(2004/05)
46.6%
(2006/07)
49%
(2007/08)
47.3%
(2008/09)
% of residents
surveyed
feeling
safe
whilst o
utside
during
the
day
88.9%
(2002/03)
94.5%
(2003/04)
93.3%
(2004/05)
93.8%
(2005/06)
94.5%
(2007/08)
94.8%
(2008/09)
Not available
55%
(2007/08)
49.7%
(2008/09)
94.5%
(2007/08)
94.5%
(2008/09)
Shows a
total improvement of
10.4%
in the
% of residents
surveyed
who
feel safe
whilst
outside
at night.
However recently
there
has been
a slight decline
of
1.7%
in those
that feel safe
between
2007/09)
Shows a
total increase
of 5.9%
in
the
% of residents
who
feel safe
whilst outside
during
the
day.
Darlington
Borough
Council Policy
Department
Anti
– social
behaviour
*
NI17: Perceptions of anti
social behaviour:
23%
(2006/07)
17%
(2008/09)
A high
perception
of ASB
is a
score
of 11
above. T
he
indicator is
the
% of
England:
20%
(2008/09)
North
East:
21.2%
(2008/09)
Local Targets:
22%
(2008/09)
21.5%
(2009/10)
19.5%
(2010/11)
Shows that high
perceptions of
anti social behaviour are
decreasing
and
are
below
regional and
national averages.
Darlington
exceeded
the
08/09
target for this
indicator by 5%
Darlington
Borough
Council Policy
Department
Government O
ffice
for the
North
East
http://www.gos.gov.uk/gone/news/ne
wsarchive/ne_crime_down/
(accessed
May 2009)
63
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Safer Communities
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
respondents
whose
score
was 11
or above
Road
accident
casualties
(rolling
average
3
calendar
years)
*
NI47: People
killed
or
seriously
injured
in road
traffic
accidents:
8.2%
(1998/00)
11.9%
(1999/01)
5%
(2000/02)
13.5%
(2001/03)
1.7%
(2002/04)
2.6%
(2003/05)
24.2%
(2004/06)
7.4%
(2005/07)
5.1%
(2006/08)
17.6%
(2007/09)
Good
perform
ance
is typified
by a
positive
% change. Poor
perform
ance
is typified
by a
negative
figure
England:
4.3
(2006/08)
North
East:
3.1
(2006/08)
National casualty
reduction
target of
reducing
by 2010
the
number of people
killed
or seriously
injured
in road
traffic
accidents
by 40%
compared
with
the
average
for 1994
1998
Shows that overall from
1998
to
2009
there
has been
a 23.8%
reduction
in the
number of people
killed
or seriously
injured
in road
traffic
accidents. A
s of 2008
perform
ance
exceeded
national
and
regional reductions
Hub
Data
https://www.hub.info4local.gov.uk/DI
HWEB/Homepage.aspx (accessed
Feb
2011)
Children
killed
or seriously
injured
in road
traffic
*
NI48
7.7
(1998/00)
33.3
(1999/01)
25
(2000/02)
16.7
(2001/03)
10
(2002/04)
54.5
(2003/05)
11.8
(2004/06)
5.3
(2005/07)
30
(2006/08)
35.7
(2007/09)
England:
6.8
(2006/08)
North
East:
5.9
(2006/08)
National casualty
reduction
target of
reducing
by 2010
the
number of people
killed
or seriously
injured
in road
traffic
accidents
by 40%
compared
with
the
average
for 1994
1998
Shows that overall from
1998
to
2009
there
has been
a 66.8%
reduction
in the
number of
children
killed
or seriously
injured
in
road
traffic
accidents. As of
2008
perform
ance
significantly
exceeded
national and
regional
reductions.
Hub
Data
https://www.hub.info4local.gov.uk/DI
HWEB/Homepage.aspx (accessed
Feb
2011)
Health
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Male
and
female
life
expectancy at
Males:
74.80
(2001/03)
74.70
(2002/04)
North
East Males:
74.70
(2001/03)
74.90
(2002/04)
Should
be
to
increase
life
expectancy to
national averages or
Shows an
increase
of 1.8
years
in m
ale
life
expectancy
over the
period
2001/09.
ONS
Life
Expectancy at B
irth
http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.g
ov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.
64
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Health
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
birth
***
75.20
(2003/05)
75.20
(2004/06)
76.30
(2006/08)
76.60
(2007/09)
Females:
79.60
(2001/03)
79.90
(2002/04)
80.00
(2003/05)
80.00
(2004/06)
80.40
(2006/08)
80.80
(2007/09)
Inequalities:
Reported
13
year difference
in
life
expectancy between
the
most and
least deprived
wards.
75.40
(2003/05)
75.80
(2004/06)
76.40
(2006/08)
76.80
(2007/09)
England
Males:
76.23
(2001/03)
76.53
(2002/04)
76.90
(2003/05)
77.32
(2004/06)
77.90
(2006/08)
78.30
(2007/09)
North
East
Females:
79.50
(2001/03)
79.60
(2002/04)
79.80
(2003/05)
80.10
(2004/06)
80.60
(2006/08)
80.90
(2007/09)
England
Females:
80.72
(2001/03)
80.91
(2002/04)
81.14
(2003/05)
81.55
(2004/06)
82.02
(2006/08)
82.30
(2007/09)
above.
Should
be
to
reduce
the
gap
in life
expectancy
between
the
most and
least deprived
wards
Previously
above
the
regional
average, Darlington’s
male
life
expectancy is
now
0.2
years
behind
the
regional average
and
1.7
years
behind
the
national average
Shows an
increase
of 1.2
years
in female
life
expectancy
over the
period
2001/09.
Previously
above
the
regional
average, Darlington’s
female
life
expectancy is
now
0.1
years
below
the
regional
average
and
1.5
years
below
the
national average
No
trend
is currently available
as to
whether this
gap
is
expanding
or narrowing
do?a=3&b=276816&c=Darlington&d=
13&e=6&g=387623&i=1001x1003x1
004&m=0&r=1&s=1243523900609&
enc=1&dsFamilyId=937
(accessed
Feb
2011)
Sustainable
Community Strategy
One
Darlington: P
erfectly Placed
(20082021)
Early Deaths:
Circulatory
Diseases
***
NI121: Mortality rate
from
all
circulatory
diseases at age
under 75:
78.81
(05)
86.97
(06)
88.1
(07)
84.48
(08)
North
East:
97.64
(05)
96.1.3B1
(06)
87.63
(07)
81.08
(08)
England:
84.03
(05)
79.00
(06)
Health
PSA:
Reduce
mortality rates
by 2010
from
heart
disease
and
stroke
and
related
diseases by at
least 40%
in people
under 75
Shows an
increase
of
5.67early deaths from
circulatory
disease
in
Darlington
over the
period
2005/08. Early deaths are
above
the
regional and
national averages
Hub
Data
https://www.hub.info4local.gov.uk/DI
HWEB/Homepage.aspx (accessed
March
2010)
65
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Health
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
74.40
(07)
71.02
(08)
Obesity
***
NI55: Obesity among
primary
school age
children
in
Reception
Year
10.7%
(2006/07)
10.71%
(2007/08)
9.99%
(2008/09)
NI56: Obesity among
primary
school age
children
in
Year 6:
21%
(2006/07)
20.4%
(2007/08)
19.9%
(2008/09)
The
prevalence
of recorder
obesity in
Darlington
is
greater than
the
national
and
regional average.
England:
9.6%
(2007/08)
Figures for 08/09
not
available
England:
17.5%
(2006/07)
Figures for 08/09
not
available
By 2020
to have
reduced
the
proportion
of overweight a
nd
obese
children
to
2000
levels
Shows a
decrease
in obesity
amongst R
eception
Year
children
of 0.71%
and
1.1%
of
children
in Year 6. H
igher rates
of obesity are
prevalent
amongst children
in Year 6
as
opposed
to younger children
in
Reception
years. D
arlington
has a
higher obesity rate
that
the
national average
in both
reception
and
year 6
years
Prevalence
of obesity has
increased
at a
greater rate
than
nationally
or regionally.
Hub
Data
https://www.hub.info4local.gov.uk/DI
HWEB/Homepage.aspx (accessed
March
2010)
Single
Needs Assessment 2010/11
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Childrens%20Services
/Darlington%202010_11%20JSNA%
20Feb%203.pdf
Under 18
conception
rate
*
NI112: Change
in the
rate
of
under 18
conceptions per
1,000
girls
aged
1517
years:
13.6%
(2006/07)
13.7%
(2007/08)
20.1%
(2008/09)
North
East:
13.6
(2006)
6.4
(2007)
England:
16.1.3C
(2006)
10.7
(2007)
National target to
reduce
the
under 18
conception
rate
by 50%
by 2010
compared
to the
1998
baseline
Local Targets:
37.50%
(08/09)
46.20%
(09/10)
55.00%
(10/11)
Shows a
slight reduction
in the
conception
rate
of under 18
per 1,000
1517
year olds .
However the
target reduction
for 200809
was not m
et.
Rate
of reduction
is greater
than
the
national and
regional
average
Hub
Data
https://www.hub.info4local.gov.uk/DI
HWEB/Homepage.aspx (accessed
March
2010)
Darlington
Borough
Council
Corporate
Plan
20082012
66
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Health
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Binge
drinking
**
Binge
drinking
prevalence
is
estimated
to be
31.1%
in
Darlington.
Nationally: 18%
of
adults
Figure
for Darlington
is
significantly higher than
the
national one.
Single
Needs Assessment 2010/11
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Childrens%20Services
/Darlington%202010_11%20JSNA%
20Feb%203.pdf
Dementia
**
Dementia
prevalence
in
Darlington
is higher than
nationally
and
regionally.
Dementia
prevalence
is
predicted
to increase
in
Darlington
between
2010
and
2030. The
proportion
aged
65
and
over with
dementia
is
predicted
to rise
to
just below
10%
by
2030.
Single
Needs Assessment 2010/11
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Childrens%20Services
/Darlington%202010_11%20JSNA%
20Feb%203.pdf
Recreation
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
%
of the
population
within
20
minutes travel
time
of 3
different
sports facility
types
**
41.9%
(2006/07)
England:
42.16%
Not a
pplicable
Shows 0.26%
less of the
population
of
Darlington
live
within
20
minutes travel
time
of 3
different sports facility
types
than
the
national average
Sport
England
available
through
the
Audit
Commission
website
http://www.areaprofiles.audit
commission.gov.uk/(p01be55
5scismkybatwize
55)/DetailP
age.aspx?e
ntity=10001194) (accessed
May 2009)
Adult
participation
in
sport
(meeting
NI08: Adult participation
in sport:
21.06%
(2006/07)
23.40%
(2007/08)
26.62%
(2008/09)
North
East
Average:
21.4
(2006/07)
21.9
(2007/08)
Local Targets:
22.10%
(08/09)
23.10%
(09/10)
25.10%
(10/11)
26.10%
(11/12)
Just over a
quarter of the
adult
population
participate
in sport
and
active
recreation. H
owever the
figures show
a
5.56%
increase
in adult participation
in
Darlington
and
in 07/08
Darlington
was
Hub
Data
https://www.hub.info4local.go
v.uk/DIHWEB/Homepage.as
px (accessed
March
2010)
Darlington
Borough
Council
67
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Recreation
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
targets
etc
but
still a
low
%)
**
above
the
regional average. T
he
08/09
target was exceeded
by 4.52%.
Corporate
Plan
20082012
Sport
England
database
http://www.sportengland.org/
national_indicator_8_la_cc
3.xls
(accessed
June
2009)
Children
and
young
people’s
participation
in
sport
***
NI57: Children
and
young
people’s
participation
in highquality PE
and
sport:
87%
(2007/08)
75%
(2008/09)
England:
81%
(08/09)
Local Targets:
94%
(08/09)
94%
(09/10)
94%
(10/11)
Reduction
of 12%
in children
and
young
people
participating
in PE
and
sport.
Darlington
is 6%
below
the
national
average
and
19%
behind
local targets
Hub
Data
https://www.hub.info4local.go
v.uk/DIHWEB/Homepage.as
px (accessed
March
2010)
Darlington
Borough
Council
Corporate
Plan
20082012
Sports and
Physical
Activity
Facilities
**
Swimming
pools
9
in total
19.7m
2/1000
pop
Sports
& Community
Halls
16
in to
tal
99.5m
2/1000
pop
Health
and
Fitness
Facilities
14
in to
tal
6.14/1000
pop
Specialist Indoor Provision
6
in total
Survey response
– not e
nough
Indoor Bowls
0.08/1000
pop
Synthetic
Turf
Pitches
2
in total
0.02/1000
pop
Multiuse
Games
Area
15
in to
tal
North
East:
16.86m
2/1000
pop
England:
18.99m
2/1000
pop
North
East:
105.25m
2/1000
pop
England:
78.90m
2/1000
pop
North
East:
6.30/1000
pop
England:
5.74/1000
pop
Not a
pplicable
North
East:
0.06/1000
pop
England:
0.04/1000
pop
North
East:
Not a
pplicable
Darlington
has m
ore
swimming
pool,
indoor bowls, athletic track lane
and
golf
course
facilities per 1000
population
than
the
regional and
national averages.
Darlington
also
has m
ore
health
and
fitness facilities and
Sports and
Community Halls
per 1000
population
than
the
national average
but not the
regional average.
Darlington
has less than
the
national
and
regional average
of Synthetic Turf
Pitches.
Survey respondents
felt th
at there
is not
enough
provision
of:
•
Specialist Indoor facilities
•
Multiuse
Games Areas
•
Tennis
Courts
•
Specialist O
utdoor facilities
Survey respondents
also
felt th
at the
quality of bowling
greens in
Darlington
is
DBC
Sports and
Physical
Activity Facilities Strategy
(2009)
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/
dar_public/documents/Comm
unity%20Services/cultural_se
rvices/sports_development/D
arlington%20SPA%20Faciliti
es%20Strategy%20
%20Draft1.pdf (accessed
June
2009)
68
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Recreation
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Survey response
– not e
nough
Bowling
Greens
9
in total
Survey response
– quality rather
than
quantity
an
issue
Tennis
Courts
35
in to
tal
Survey Response
– not enough
Specialist Outdoor Provision
10
in to
tal
Survey response
– not e
nough
in
particular,
cycling
facilities
Athletic
Track
Lanes
2
in total
0.14/1000
pop
Golf
6
in total
0.83
holes/1000
pop
0.03/1000
pop
England:
0.03/1000
pop
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
North
East:
0.09/1000
pop
England:
0.05/1000
pop
North
East:
0.68/1000
pop
England:
0.68/1000
pop
an
issue
Playing
pitches
***
Ratio
of adult
pitches
per 1,000
adults:
1:1150
% of pitches
at educational
establishments
secured
for use
by
the
community: 50%
Quality
of pitches:
Excellent –
1%
Good
– 30%
Average
– 40%
Below
Average
– 30%
Poor –
1%
England:
1:989
Not available
Not available
Not a
vailable
The
ratio
of pitches to
adult population
is
1 to
1,150. T
his
does not compare
favourably
with
the
national figure
and
indicates that the
supply
of pitches in
Darlington
is lower than
the
national
average
The
proportion
of the
overall pitch
stock
that is
available
for community use
(category
A) is
low
in comparison
to
the
majority
of known
local authorities, with
only
50%
of pitches deemed
to have
secure
public
access
The
majority
of the
pitches in
the
Borough
are
classified
as average
Darlington
Borough
Council
Playing
Pitch
Strategy (May
2009)
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/
dar_public/documents/Comm
unity%20Services/cultural_se
rvices/sports_development/D
ARLINGTON%20DRAFT%2
0PLAYING%20PITCH%20S
TRATEGY.pdf (accessed
June
2009)
69
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Recreation
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
quality
Public
Rights
of W
ay
***
Footpaths –
280km
Bridleways –
66km
Byways –
0.13km
•
30km
are
located
within
the
town
of Darlington
itself.
•
45%
of the
population
say that
they use
the
network
either
never or very
occasionally
•
20%
say that they use
the
network
once
a m
onth
•
35%
are
regular users
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
The
% of the
population
using
the
Darlington
countryside
as a
place
for
quality walking, cycling
or riding
is very
low
– less than
5%
of the
population
Only
9%
of paths are
judged
to be
of a
very
high
quality and
have
a high
level
of usage.
Further surveys will
identify
whether this
trend
is im
proving
or worsening
Darlington’s
Right of W
ay
Improvement P
lan
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/
dar_public/documents/Devel
opment%
20and%20Environ
ment/Countryside/ROWIP%2
0summary%201.pdf
(accessed
June
2009)
Culture
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Visits to
museums or
galleries
**
NI10: Visits to
museums
or galleries:
49.78%
(2008)
48.10%
(2009)
North
East:
52.10%
(2008)
50.30%
(2009)
Not a
vailable
Decrease
in th
e %
of population
visiting
museums and
galleries.
Slightly below
the
regional
average
Hub
Data
https://www.hub.info4local.gov.uk/DI
HWEB/Homepage.aspx (accessed
March
2010)
Engagement in
the
arts
*
NI11: Engagement in
the
arts:
42.09%
(2008)
44.2%
(2009)
North
East:
39%
(2008)
38.9%
(2009)
Not a
vailable
Shows an
increase
in
engagement in
the
arts.
Participation
is above
the
regional
average.
Hub
Data
https://www.hub.info4local.gov.uk/DI
HWEB/Homepage.aspx (accessed
March
2010)
Heritage
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparato
rs
Targets
Trends
Source
Listed
heritage
Grade
1: 8
Grade
II*:
32
Grade
II: 481
Not
applicable
Not a
pplicable
The
number of listed
buildings within
the
Borough
may change
over time. S
hows
that the
majority
of listed
buildings in
the
Borough
are
of a
Grade
II designation
Darlington
Borough
Council
Conservation
Officer
Listed
Heritage
at
Risk 2005
•
24
listed
heritage
assets
(2005)
•
24
listed
heritage
assets
(2006)
•
26
listed
heritage
assets
(2008)
Not
applicable
The
target should
be
to ensure
that
Darlington’s
Shows that in
total from
the
period
2005/08
an
increase
of 2
heritage
assets
are
on
the
heritage
at risk register.
Darlington
Borough
Council,
Buildings at R
isk
Register (July
2005)
70
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Heritage
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparato
rs
Targets
Trends
Source
2008
**
heritage
is not at
risk
In term
s of m
ovement from
the
list,
1
heritage
asset was removed
from
the
2006
register but an
additional 3
were
added
to the
2008
list.
Darlington
Borough
Council,
Buildings at R
isk
Register (November 2006)
Darlington
Borough
Council,
Buildings at R
isk
Register (February
2008)
Listed
heritage
at
risk 2008
Grade
1:
Extreme
Risk (1):
All Saints
Church
Grade
II*:
Extreme
Risk (1):
Sockburn
Hall;
Sockburn
Hall Coach
House; D
ovecote, HoughtonleSide;
Middridge
Grange
Farm
house; N
orth
Road
Railw
ay Station
Grade
II
At R
isk (3):
Bandstand
in North
Lodge; Deer House,
Coatham
Mundeville; G
lebe
Farm
house;
North
Farm
; Water Pump; P
olam
Lane
Bridge; 138148
Northgate;
Vulnerable
Building(4):
Skerne
Lodge; Outer Wall and
Gate
Piers, H
eighington; H
opetown
Carriage
Works; F
orm
er Goods Shed;
Farm
builidngs, S
ummerhouse; C
artshed,
Middridge
Grange; 35
Tubwell Row; W
all
at N
ag’s
Head; Neasham
House; 8
2
Not
applicable
The
target should
be
to ensure
that
Darlington’s
heritage
is not at
risk
Shows that a
total of 26
listed
heritage
assets
are
at risk. T
his
equates to
5.02%
of Darlington’s
listed
heritage. In
term
s of
% per grading
type
this
is as follows:
Grade
1 –
12.5%
Grade
II* 16%
Grade
II –
3.7%
Risk
Scale:
At E
xtreme
Risk
•
Total of 6
listed
heritage
assets
•
23%
of those
on
the
risk register
•
1%
of Darlington’s
total listed
heritage
At G
rave
Risk:
0%
At R
isk
•
Total of 7
listed
heritage
assets
•
27%
of those
on
the
risk register
•
1.3%
of Darlington’s
total listed
heritage
Vulnerable
Buildings
•
Total of 11
listed
heritage
assets
•
42%
of those
on
the
risk register
•
2.1%
of Darlington’s
total listed
heritage
Summary:
The
number of heritage
assets
at risk m
ay
change
over time. C
urrently, a
greater
Darlington
Borough
Council,
Buildings at R
isk
Register (February
2008)
Heritage
At R
isk Register
2010, http://risk.english
heritage.org.uk/2010.aspx
71
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Heritage
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparato
rs
Targets
Trends
Source
Cockerton
Green; W
all at Woodland
Rd
The
Heritage
at Risk Register 2010
includes m
ost of the
Grade
I and
II*
buildings above, except N
orth
Road
Railw
ay Station
and
the
Sockburn
Hall
Coach
House..
proportion
of outstanding
or particularly
significant heritage
assets
are
at risk
(Grade
1 and
II*).
Heritage
that is
at risk is
currently m
ostly
in a
vulnerable
condition
than
at extreme
risk. 5
heritage
assets
(21%) of those
at
risk are
or will
be
undergoing
restoration
Granted
applications
for Listed
building
consent
*
36
(2005/06)
52
(2006/07)
43
(2007/08)
43
(2008/09)
48
(2009/10)
Not
applicable
Not a
pplicable
Shows a
33%
increase
in the
number of
granted
applications over the
period
2005/10. It
is assumed
that an
application
will
only
be
granted
if it
improves the
condition
of a
listed
building
so
an
increase
in granted
applications is
positive
Darlington
Borough
Council
Conservation
Officer
Sites and
Monuments
(SMR) Sites
613
of local/regional significance
Not
applicable
Not a
vailable
The
number of SMR
Sites m
ay change
over time
Durham
County
Council –
Historic Environment
Record
http://www.keystothepast.in
fo/k2p/usp.nsf/pws/Keys+to
+the+past++Home+Page
(accessed
Feb
2011)
Scheduled
Ancient
Monuments
Number 20
Density 1
per 9.85km
2
Hartlepool
– 8
Middlesbro
ugh
– 3
Stockton
onTees –
8
Redcar and
Cleveland
–
83
North
East
Density:
1 per 6.18
km
2
Not a
pplicable
The
number of Scheduled
Ancient
Monuments
within
the
borough
may
change
over time. D
arlington
has the
second
highest number of SAM’s
in th
e
Tees Valley. The
density of SAM’s
in
Darlington
is slightly below
the
North
East
Average
Darlington
Borough
Council
Conservation
Officer
English
Heritage:
Monuments
at R
isk North
East
http://www.english
heritage.org.uk/upload/pdf/
MAR_NE.pdf?1243589945
(accessed
May 2009)
72
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Heritage
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparato
rs
Targets
Trends
Source
Scheduled
Ancient
Monuments
at
Risk
**
Scheduled
Ancient Monuments
at Risk
2009
High
risk:
•
Shackleton
Beacon
hillfort
and
tower
mill
•
All Saints’ C
hurch, Sockburn
•
Medieval m
oated
manorial site
of
Low
Dinsdale
Medium
risk:
•
Ketton
Bridge
•
Piercebridge
Bridge
•
Starfish
Bombing
Decoy Site
SF40A
Low
risk
•
Skerne
Bridge
The
Heritage
at Risk 2010
register,
in
addition
to
the
two
sites noted
as ‘H
igh
risk’ above, a
lso
identifies the
Low
Dinsdale
Mediaeval M
oated
Manor Site
as being
at risk.
Not
available
The
target should
be
to ensure
that
no
SAM’s
are
on
the
risk register
10%
of Darlington’s
SAM’s
are
classified
by the
Audit at H
igh
Risk, and
30%
at
some
level of risk. T
he
number of SAM’s
at risk m
ay change
over time.
Darlington
Borough
Council
Scheduled
Monuments
Audit 2009
Heritage
At R
isk Register
2010, http://risk.english
heritage.org.uk/2010.aspx
Scheduled
Monuments
Audit
**
Average
star rating:
Access –
2/5
Visibility
– 3/5
Interpretation
– 1/5
Condition
– 3/5
Not
available
Not a
pplicable
Shows that improvements
are
needed
in
particular to
the
accessibility
and
provision
of interpretation
at scheduled
monuments
Darlington
Borough
Council
Scheduled
Monuments
Audit 2009
Railw
ay
Heritage
14
of Darlington’s
Railw
ay Heritage
assets
are
designated. 3
are
designated
as Grade
II* and
8 are
designated
as
Grade
II. 2
Grade
II* assets
are
at risk
and
1 Grade
II asset.
This
equates to
21%
of listed
railw
ay heritage
Not
available
The
target shout b
e
to ensure
that none
of Darlington’s
railw
ay heritage
is
at risk
Not a
vailable
Darlington
Borough
Council
Conservation
Officer
Locally
important
buildings
***
A record
of locally
important buildings
has not been
established
Not
applicable
Not a
pplicable
Locally
important b
uildings m
ay be
at risk
from
development and
other pressures as
they have
not yet b
een
classified
and
may
not b
e taken
into
account in
planning
decisions
Darlington
Borough
Council
Conservation
Officer
73
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Heritage
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparato
rs
Targets
Trends
Source
Conservation
Areas
**
Darlington
has 16
Conservation
Areas:
•
Bishopton
•
Coatham
Mundeville
•
Cockerton
•
Denton
•
Haughton
•
Heighington
•
High
Coniscliffe
•
Hurworth
•
Northgate
•
Middleton
One
Row
•
Piercebridge
•
Sadberge
•
Stanhope
and
Grange
Road
•
Summerhouse
•
Town
Centre
•
Victoria
Embankment
•
Parkgate
is a
potential C
onservation
Area.
Those
that are
underlined
have
Character Appraisals
(9
in total)
In total 460.29
ha
(2.3%) of the
Borough
is
designated
as a
conservation
area
The
Heritage
at Risk Register 2010
identifies the
Victoria
Embankment and
Northgate
Conservation
Areas as being
at risk.
Not
applicable
The
target should
be
to ensure
that
the
unique
characteristics of
Darlington’s
conservation
areas
are
not jeopardised.
Undertaking
character
appraisals
for all of
Darlington’s
conservation
areas
will
assist with
the
protection
of these
areas as the
unique
components
that
give
the
area
its
character will
be
identified
and
readily available
to
developers
etc
The
number of conservation
areas m
ay
change
over time. T
he
numbers
with
character appraisals
should
increase
which
may afford
them
better protection.
Current issues with
the
Conservation
areas include:
•
Loss of buildings from
the
key periods
of the
area’s
development
•
Unsympathetic design
of newer
buildings
•
Damage
to th
e character of surviving
buildings (façade
etc)
•
Loss of traditional features such
as
sash
windows, cast iron
rainwater
goods etc
•
Cluttered
streetscapes
•
High
levels
of traffic
in some
areas
•
Vacant/disused
and
overgrown
land
Discussions with
the
Conservation
Officer
has highlighted
that the
general
impression
of Darlington’s
conservation
areas is
that they are
declining
Darlington
Borough
Council
Conservation
Officer
Conservation
Area
Character Appraisals
2006
2010
Heritage
At R
isk Register
2010, http://risk.english
heritage.org.uk/2010.aspx
Historic Parks
and
Gardens
Darlington
borough
has two
sites on
the
English
Heritage
Register of Historic
Parks and
Gardens:
South
ParkGrade
II
Not
applicable
74
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Heritage
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparato
rs
Targets
Trends
Source
West C
emeteryGrade
II
A further nine
‘parks and
gardens of
landscape
or historic interest’ have
been
identified
in th
e Local P
lan
of 1997:
North
Lodge
Park, D
arlington
Blackwell Grange, D
arlington
Rockcliffe
Park, H
urworth
Middleton
Hall,
MSG
Walworth
Castle
Redworth
Hall
Hall Grange, C
oatham
Mundeville
Newbus Grange, Hurworth
Neasham
Hall
Historic
Landscape
A
Historic Landscape
Characterisation
is
being
carried
out for Darlington
Borough
by Durham
County
Council.
The
results
of this
will
be
incorporated
into
the
Sustainability
Appraisal baseline
as soon
as they become
available.
Land/Townscape
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Landscape
Character
***
Darlington’s
landscape
character
is m
ainly
classified
as Tees
Lowlands. O
ther landscape
character classifications include:
Durham
Magnesium
Limestone
(small area
in the
North/North
West of the
Borough)
Pennine
Dales Fringe
(small area
in
the
North
West of the
Borough)
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
The
Tees Lowlands has
problems with:
• Hedgerow
removal and
the
loss
of m
eadows and
pasture
through
agricultural Intensification
• Recreational development near
to urban
areas e.g. golf courses
Natural E
ngland
http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/our
work/landscape/englands/character/a
reas/northeast.aspx (accessed
June
2009)
Tranquility
* The
mean
tranquillity score
for
Darlington
is 13.1
Mapping
data
shows that p
eople
are
least likely
to experience
Darlington
Borough
is
ranked
39th
out
of the
87
county
Target should
be
to
increase
the
tranquillity score
of
Darlington
Borough
The
urbanised
parts of the
Borough
are
the
least tranquil.
The
rural W
est and
North
East of
the
Borough
are
the
most tranquil
Campaign
to
Protect R
ural E
ngland
website
– Tranquillity mapping
http://www.cpre.org.uk/campaigns/la
ndscape/tranquillity/nationaland
75
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Land/Townscape
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
tranquillity in
Darlington
town
and
are
most likely
to experience
tranquillity in
the
areas
surrounding
the
villages of
Denton, W
alworth
and
Summerhouse
and
the
area
surrounding
the
villages of
Bishopton
and
Brafferton
council/unitary
authority
areas.
Nearest
neighbours
scored:
Durham
+12.0
Darlington
13.1
Redcar and
Cleveland
13.3
Stockton
on
Tees 24.6
Middlesbrough
55.9
Darlington
is the
most tranquil of
the
Tees Valley authorities
regionaltranquillitym
aps/county
tranquillitym
apdurham
(accessed
May 2009)
Provision
of
Open
Space
**
•
Total area
of open
space:
703.93ha
•
Proportion
within
main
urban
area
or on
the
fringe: 9
3%
•
No
over 0.1
ha: 2
76
•
Accessible
Open
Space/1000
population:
6.61ha
•
High
Value
Sites: 74%
•
Low
Value
Sites: 7%
Not a
pplicable
Natural E
ngland
Accessible
Natural
Greenspace
Standard
of at least
2ha
of natural green
space
per 1,000
population
Local T
argets:
•
6.2ha
accessible
/1000
population
•
99%
of all homes
in the
urban
area
to
be
within
300m
of an
accessible
open
space
of at least
0.1ha
•
25%
of open
space
to be
of
high
quality
•
75%
of open
space
to be
of
medium
quality
Shows that Darlington
has a
high
provision
of open
space
that is
over three
times the
national
standard
level of provision. The
majority
of open
space
within
Darlington
is also
of High
Value.
However,
several issues exist:
•
Poor levels
of provision
coincide
with
areas of
deprivation
•
Differences in
the
quality of
open
space
depending
on
where
residents
live
•
Geographical gaps in
the
provision
of specific
types of
open
space
•
Evolving
open
space
needs of
an
ageing
population
•
Protection
and
enhancement
of open
spaces within
villages
The
number of spaces of below
average
quality has decreased
in
Darlington
Borough
Council Open
Spaces Strategy 20062011
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Development%
20and
%20Environment/Development%
20a
nd%20Regeneration/Planning%20Se
rvices/Policy/Studies/OpenSpace/OS
SExecSummary.pdf (accessed
June
2009)
Open
Spaces Strategy Update
Report
(2011)
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Development%
20and
%20Environment/Development%
20a
nd%20Regeneration/Planning%20Se
rvices/Policy/OSS%205.pdf
76
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Land/Townscape
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
recent years. H
owever,
31%
of
natural and
seminatural sites are
below
average
quality.
Parks and
Gardens
**
Darlington
has 14
Parks and
Gardens. 2
of which
are
of 5*
quality and
2 of 4* quality. South
Park
is the
oldest public
park
in
the
NE
and
has been
awarded
green
flag
status
Not a
pplicable
As above
There
is potential to
improve
the
quality of Darlington’s
parks and
gardens.
Open
Spaces Strategy Update
Report
(2011)
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_pub
lic/documents/Development%
20and
%20Environment/Development%
20a
nd%20Regeneration/Planning%20Se
rvices/Policy/OSS%205.pdf
Green
Flag
Awards
http://www.greenflagaward.org.uk/wi
nners/GSP001287/ (accessed
June
2009)
Housing
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Total number
of households
in the
borough
***
2001: 42,000
2011: 46,670
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Over the
last ten
years
Darlington
has seen
the
number
of households grow
by 11.1%,
the
highest p
ercentage
growth
in
the
North
East a
nd
one
of the
five
highest in
the
North
of
England.
2011
Census figures:
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/datase
tsandtables/index.htm
l
Household
Structure
33.7%
couple
without children
16.3%
couple
with
children
32.4%
single
without children
5.9%
single
with
children
11.7%
other multiperson
household
North
East:
27.8%
couple
without
children
21.4%
couple
with
children
31.2%
single
without
children
7.1%
single
with
children
12.5%
other multiperson
household
England:
28.8%
couple
without
Not a
pplicable
A
higher percentage
of couples
and
single
people
without
children
occur within
the
borough
compared
to regional
and
national average.
A lower percentage
of couples
with
children, lone
parents
and
other multiperson
households
occur within
the
borough
compared
to regional and
national average.
Darlington
2005
Local H
ousing
Assessment (2006)
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_
public/documents/Community%20
Services/Housing/DarlingtonLHAF
inalAPR06.pdf (accessed
June
2009)
2004
ONS
Regional T
rends table
77
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Housing
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
children
26.1.3B%
couple
with
children
28.8%
single
without
children
6.5%
single
with
children
13.1%
other multiperson
household
Tenure
Profile
Owner occupied
73%
(2009)
Private
rented
11%
(2009)
RSL
4%
(2009)
Local A
uthority
12%
(2009)
England
Owner occupied
70%
(2006)
Private
rented
12%
(2006)
RSL
8%
(2006)
Local A
uthority
10%
(2006)
Not a
pplicable
Shows that the
proportion
of
dwellings in
owner occupation
(by far the
largest category) and
in
local authority
ownership
is
higher for Darlington
than
for the
country as a
whole, whereas the
proportion
of dwellings let by
private
and
registered
social
landlords is
lower.
DBC
Private
Sector House
Condition
Survey 2009
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_
public/documents/Community%20
Services/Housing/privatesectorho
usecondition.pdf
Accessed
Feb
2011
Average
Household
size
**
2.27
(2001)
2.23
(2011)
England:
2.36
(was 2.36)
North
East:
2.25
Not a
pplicable
Shows that Darlington
has an
average
household
size
of 0.13
people
below
the
national
average, and
0.02
people
below
the
regional average. Average
household
size
in Darlington
has
shrunk by 1.7%
while
the
national average
has remained
stable.
2011
Census figures:
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/datase
tsandtables/index.htm
l
Average
House
Price
Borough
Detached
£209,901
(Apr 06)
£217,860
(Apr 07)
£221,912
(Apr 08)
£188,506
(Apr 09)
£190,597
(Apr 10)
National price
deflation
–
16.2%
Not a
pplicable
Shows that for all housing
types
prices rose
steadily
between
2006
and
2008. However prices
crashed
in 2009
with
an
overall
average
decrease
of £15,707
(13%).
In 2010
prices recovered
slightly but h
ave
since
resumed
a
steady drop.
Land
Registry Property Prices
(20062009)
http://www1.landregistry.gov.uk/h
ouseprices/housepriceindex/repor
t/default.asp?step=4&locationTyp
e=0&area=Darlington&reporttype
=3&datetype=1&from1=01%2F20
06&from2=04%2F2009&image2.x
=35&image2.y=12
(accessed
Sep
2012)
78
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Housing
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
£184,176
(Apr 11)
£177,234
(Apr 12)
Semidetached
£119,271
(Apr 06)
£123,793
(Apr 07)
£126,096
(Apr 08)
£107,114
(Apr 09)
£108,302
(Apr 10)
£104,653
(Apr 11)
£100,709
(Apr 12)
Terraced
£72,164
(Apr 06)
£74,901
(Apr 07)
£76,294
(Apr 08)
£64,809
(Apr 09)
£65,527
(Apr 10)
£63,320
(Apr 11)
£60,933
(Apr 12)
Flat
£135,808
(Apr 06)
£140,957
(Apr 07)
£143,579
(Apr 08)
£121,965
(Apr 09)
£123,317
(Apr 10)
£119,163
(Apr 11)
£114,672
(Apr 12)
Overall
£124,016
(Apr 06)
£129,016
(Apr 07)
£131,749
(Apr 08)
£108,309
(Apr 09)
£113,369
(Apr 10)
House
Price
6.5
(2007)
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Shows a
decrease
of 1.8
in the
Land
Registry Property Prices
79
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Housing
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
to
Income
Ratio
*
5.8
(2008)
4.7
(2009)
house
price
to
income
ratio
for
the
period
20072009.
(20062009)
http://www1.landregistry.gov.uk/h
ouseprices/housepriceindex/repor
t/default.asp?step=4&locationTyp
e=0&area=Darlington&reporttype
=3&datetype=1&from1=01%2F20
06&from2=04%2F2009&image2.x
=35&image2.y=12
(accessed
March
2010)
Darlington
Borough
Council Policy
Department (Average
earnings of
employees)
Housing
provision
to
2021
(2010
2021)
***
8675
net additional units total 2004
26
averaging
377
units per annum
(RSS)
The
Core
Strategy Presubmission
Draft
identifies a
shortfall of 2535
dwellings against the
RSS
requirement for the
period
20112026
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
Not a
pplicable
The
North
East of England
Regional S
patial S
trategy to
2021
http://www.gos.gov.uk/nestore/do
cs/planning/rss/rss.pdf (accessed
June
2009)
Net a
dditional
homes
provided
***
NI154: Net a
dditional
Homes provided:
431
(2004/05)
555
(2005/06)
490
(2006/07)
547
(2007/08)
232
(2008/09)
221
(2009/10)
Not a
pplicable
Darlington
Borough
Council Policy
Department
Regional S
patial S
trategy to
2021
http://www.gos.gov.uk/nestore/do
cs/planning/rss/rss.pdf (accessed
June
2009)
% of new
dwellings
provided
on
previously
developed
land
***
54%
(2009/10)
Not a
pplicable
Government
target 60%
of all new
housing
developments
should
be
built
on
previously
developed
Shows that Darlington
is six
percentage
points
below
the
government target of 60%
of all
new
housing
developments
to
be
built
on
previously
developed
land.
DBC, Annual M
onitoring
Report
(2007/08)
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_
public/documents/Development%
20and%20Environment/Developm
ent%
20and%20Regeneration/Pla
nning%20Services/Policy/LDF/AM
R/AMR20078.pdf (accessed
80
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Housing
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
land
June
2009)
Housing
need
**
2510
existing
households in
some
form
of housing
need
across the
borough
(5.6%
of all
households) (O
ctober 2005)
Not available
Target should
be
to ensure
as few
households as
possible
are
in
housing
need
Not a
vailable
Darlington
2005
Local H
ousing
Assessment (2006)
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_
public/documents/Community%20
Services/Housing/DarlingtonLHAF
inalAPR06.pdf (accessed
June
2009)
Housing
stock
and
demand
(private
sector)
**
13.2%
Small terraced
19.4%
Medium/large
terraced
33.8%
Semidetached
13.2%
Detached
14.7%
Bungalow
1.7%
Converted
flats
4.0%
Lowrise
purposebuilt
flats
0.0%
Highrise
purposebuilt
flats
There
is a
high
demand
for owner
occupied, three
bed
roomed
terraced
or semi detached
houses. T
his
is
followed
by demand
for detached
houses and
bungalows.
England:
10.1%
Small terraced
19.1%
Medium/large
terraced
28.3%
Semidetached
18.7%
Detached
9.0%
Bungalow
3.6%
Converted
flats
10.3%
Lowrise
purpose
built
flats
0.9%
Highrise
purpose
built
flats
Not a
pplicable
Compared
to th
e national
average, Darlington
has a
high
proportion
of small terraced
houses, semidetached
houses
and
bungalows in
its private
sector housing
stock; and
a
lower proportion
of detached
houses and
flats
Housing
supply
does not m
atch
demand. N
eed
for more
family
sized
housing
Tees Valley Strategic
Housing
Market A
ssessment (2009)
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/Hous
ing/m
arketneeds/housingstrategy/
SHMA.htm
DBC
Private
Sector House
Condition
Survey 2009
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_
public/documents/Community%20
Services/Housing/privatesectorho
usecondition.pdf
Accessed
Feb
2011
Long
term
vacancy
(private
sector)
**
Vacant 3.7%
Longterm
vacant 1.0%
North
East E
ngland
Vacant 4.1%
Longterm
vacant 2.0%
England
Vacant 4.1%
Longterm
vacant 1.6%
Aim
should
be
to
reduce
the
number of
vacant
properties
Darlington’s
percentages for
vacant and
longterm
vacant
properties are
lower than
both
the
regional and
national
averages.
DBC
Private
Sector House
Condition
Survey 2009
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_
public/documents/Community%20
Services/Housing/privatesectorho
usecondition.pdf
Accessed
Feb
2011
Nondecent
private
sector
dwellings
***
33.8%
of dwellings in
the
Borough
are
nondecent.
Nondecency mostly caused
by
Category
1 hazards or poor degree
of
therm
al comfort. O
nly
60.9%
of
vulnerable
households in
the
borough
are
in decent h
omes.
Stockton
15.9%
England
35.8%
Over 75%
of
vulnerable
households
living
in
decent homes
by 2020
(Form
erly
official target)
81
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Housing
Indicator
Quantified
Data
Comparators
Targets
Trends
Source
Length
of
residence
in
private
sector
dwellings
**
Years
resident in
current d
welling
43.2%: 05
15.1%: 610
8.6%: 1115
5.0%: 1620
8.6%: 2125
5.5%: 2630
14%: O
ver 30
Not available
Aim
should
be
to
increase
the
length
of
time
people
want to
spend
in
a single
dwelling
Nearly half Darlington
private
sector residents
had
been
in
their
current d
welling
five
years
or less. T
he
next m
ost common
length
of residence
was “610
years”,
then
“over 30
years”.
DBC
Private
Sector House
Condition
Survey 2009
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_
public/documents/Community%20
Services/Housing/privatesectorho
usecondition.pdf
Accessed
Feb
2011
Affordable
housing
requirement
***
Between
2008
and
2012
there
is an
expected
net requirement o
f 513
affordable
dwellings, the
equivalent of
103/annum
Requirement for 5
year
period:
Hartlepool: 119
Middlesbrough: 2
89
R&C: 115
Stockton: 411
Not a
pplicable
Darlington
has the
greatest
requirement for affordable
housing
of all LPAs in
the
sub
region.
Tees Valley Strategic
Housing
Market A
ssessment 2009
http://www.stockton.gov.uk/resour
ces/housing/housingstratanddev/s
hma/SHMA.pdf (accessed
Feb
2011)
Total number
of affordable
housing
completions
***
Number of affordable
homes
provided
38
(2006/07)
50
(2007/08)
25
(2008/09)
49
(2009/10)
Not available
103
p.a.
Shows that the
number of
affordable
houses delivered
has
fluctuated
since
2006, b
ut come
nowhere
near meeting
the
identified
need.
DBC
AMR
2009/10
http://www.darlington.gov.uk/dar_
public/documents/Development%
20and%20Environment/Developm
ent%
20and%20Regeneration/Pla
nning%20Services/Policy/AMR_2
00910_FINAL_DOCUMENT_App
_1_separate.pdf
Accommodati
ng
Gypsy and
Travelling
Groups
***
Tees Valley assessment
recommended
that a
total of 153
additional residential pitches will
be
required
in th
e Tees Valley in
the
period
20072026
to
meet identified
need
While
the
methodology of the
Tees Valley assessment is
questionable
it does indicate
that there
is a
need
for
additional G
ypsy and
Traveller
pitches.
Tees Valley Gypsy and
Traveller
Accommodation
Needs
Assessment (2009)
82
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
APPENDIX
C:
DEVELOPMENT
OF
SUSTAINABILITY
FRAMEWORK
Previous
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
New
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
Reasons
for Change
(NB. Multiple
objectives
have
been
rephrased
in th
e interests
of clarity, and
criteria
rephrased
in th
e interests
of
measurability.)
Attract,
encourage
and
make
provision
for
young
people
and
families
within
the
Borough, whilst catering
for an
ageing
population.
Will
it encourage
young
people
and
families to
move
to the
Borough?
Will
it encourage
young
people
and
families to
stay within
the
Borough?
Will
the
needs of an
ageing
population
be
met,
especially
in independent d
wellings?
Objective
removed
The
objective
and
its criteria
are
too
similar in
practice
to other objectives.
Specific
reference
to
young
people,
families and
older people
has been
inserted
elsewhere.
Reduce
inequalities
for the
most deprived
and
disadvantaged
Will
it
help
to
reduce
inequalities
in
employment?
Will
it help
to reduce
inequalities in
health?
Will
it im
prove
the
public
realm
within
deprived
wards?
Reduce
inequalities
by
helping
the
most deprived
and
disadvantaged
Will
it help
to
reduce
unemployment in
deprived
areas and
among
disadvantaged
groups?
Will
it help
to
improve
the
health
of people
in
deprived
areas and
among
disadvantaged
groups?
Will
it im
prove
the
public
realm
and
provide
leisure
facilities for young
people
within
deprived
wards?
Need
to
provide
leisure
facilities for
the
young
identified
through
Plans,
Policies and
Programmes review.
Enhance
community
identity
and
create
an
empowered
and
engaged
Borough
wide
community
of town, villages
and
countryside
that values
diversity
and
cares
for others
Help
the
development of community
identity
in the
Borough
and
encourage
people
to
value
diversity, care
for others
and
take
part
in
community
and
cultural activities
Cultural/arts criteria
moved
to
this
objective
from
the
heritage/landscape
objective
in order to
rationalise
the
scope
of each
objective.
83
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Previous
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
New
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
Reasons
for Change
(NB. Multiple
objectives
have
been
rephrased
in th
e interests
of clarity, and
criteria
rephrased
in th
e interests
of
measurability.)
Will
it encourage
engagement in
community
activities?
Will
it assist in
valuing
community diversity?
Will
it encourage
engagement in
community and
cultural activities?
Will
it assist in
valuing
community diversity?
Will
it protect,
and
help
the
expansion
of,
arts, community and
cultural
facilities?
Raise
aspirations
and
improve
educational
attainment and
access
to
qualifications
and
skills
in all
of the
community
through
lifelong
learning
Will
it im
prove
qualifications and
skills of young
people
and
adults?
Will
it address the
shortfall in
school places?
Will
it help
improve
or expand
education
facilities?
Improve
the
skills
and
qualifications
of all
citizens
and
raise
aspirations.
Will
it im
prove
qualifications and
skills of young
people
and
adults?
Will
it address the
shortfall in
school places?
Will
it help
improve
or expand
education
facilities?
Provide
a choice
and
mix
of affordably
accessible, good
quality
and
well
designed
sustainable
housing.
Will
it deliver housing
in sustainable
locations
with
access to
employment,
and
services by
walking, cycling
or public
transport?
Will
it deliver affordable
homes to
meet identified
Borough
needs?
Will
it deliver adaptable
housing
to
meet the
lifelong
needs of the
population?
Provide
a mixture
of affordable, well
designed
and
sustainably
located
new
housing, and
improve
the
standard
of existing
housing, especially
to
provide
for young
people, families
and
older people.
Will
it deliver housing
in sustainable
locations with
access to
employment,
and
services by walking, cycling
or public
transport?
Will
it deliver affordable
homes to
meet identified
Borough
needs?
Will
it deliver adaptable
housing
to
meet the
lifelong
needs of the
population?
‘Improve
existing
housing’ objective
combined
with
the
‘provide
new
housing’ objective
since
the
improvement of the
Borough’s
housing
stock should
involve
coordinated
action
in both
fields.
Specific
energy efficiency/renewable
energy aims are
covered
by th
e
Clim
ate
Change
objective; fuel
poverty is
more
relevant to
this
objective.
84
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Previous
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
New
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
Reasons
for Change
(NB. Multiple
objectives
have
been
rephrased
in th
e interests
of clarity, and
criteria
rephrased
in th
e interests
of
measurability.)
Will
it reduce
the
number of nondecent homes in
the
Borough?
Will
it reduce
fuel poverty, especially
in deprived
areas?
Improve
the
standard
of existing
housing
Will
it reduce
the
number of nondecent homes
in the
Borough?
Will
it reduce
energy use
in homes and
encourage
domestic and
neighbourhood
scale
renewable
energy?
Objective
removed
Improve
community
safety, reduce
crime
and
anti
social behaviour and
improve
public
confidence.
Will
it increase
the
exposure
of people
to
hazard?
Will
it reduce
crime
and
antisocial behaviour?
Will
it help
improve
traffic
safety?
Improve
community
safety, reduce
crime
and
anti
social
behaviour and
improve
public
confidence.
Will
it increase
the
exposure
of people
to
hazard?
Will
it reduce
crime
and
antisocial behaviour,
especially
in high
impact
neighbourhoods?
Will
it help
improve
traffic
safety
and
reduce
casualties?
Crime
and
anti
social behaviour have
reduced
in the
borough
as a
whole
but its concentration
in certain
high
impact neighbourhoods remains a
significant problem.
Improve
the
health
and
well
being
of all
by
reducing
health
inequalities
and
promoting
healthier lifestyles
Will
it help
reduce
health
inequalities?
Will
it encourage
healthy lifestyles including
naturebased
or outdoor leisure
activities?
Will
it im
prove
access to
health
facilities?
Improve
the
health
and
well
being
of all, reduce
health
inequalities
and
promote
healthier lifestyles
Will
it help
reduce
health
inequalities?
Will
it encourage
greater participation
in healthy lifestyles including
naturebased
or outdoor leisure
activities?
Will
it ensure
the
whole
population
has easy access to
health
facilities?
Will
it increase
local food
production?
Local food
criterion
transferred
from
defunct O
ne
Planet L
iving
objective
85
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Previous
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
New
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
Reasons
for Change
(NB. Multiple
objectives
have
been
rephrased
in th
e interests
of clarity, and
criteria
rephrased
in th
e interests
of
measurability.)
Contribute
to
One
Planet Living
Will
it encourage
local food
production?
Will
it m
ake
the
most efficient use
of land, water,
energy and
other finite
resources?
Objective
removed
Darlington’s
ecological footprint was
measured
in 2007
and
that data
is
now
likely
to be
out of date. There
is
no
immediate
prospect of the
ecological footprint b
eing
measured
again
so
the
objective
has been
removed
in the
interests
of
streamlining
the
framework. T
he
local
food
criterion
has been
moved
to the
Health
and
Wellbeing
objective; the
other criterion
is duplicated
by more
specific
criteria
elsewhere
in the
SA
framework.
Ensure
the
Borough
is
prepared
for climate
change, increase
resilience
through
adaptation
and
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions
Will
it reduce
emissions of greenhouse
gases,
including
by encouraging
energy efficiency?
Will
it encourage
renewable
energy generation?
Will
it ensure
clim
ate
adapted
design
and
resilient infrastructure?
Will
it protect a
nd
enhance
ecological networks
and
allow
for natural river change?
Increase
the
Borough’s
resilience
to
climate
change
and
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions
Will
it reduce
emissions of greenhouse
gases, including
by
encouraging
energy efficiency?
Will
it increase
renewable
energy generation?
Will
it ensure
clim
ate
adapted
design
and
resilient infrastructure?
Will
it protect a
nd
enhance
ecological networks and
allow
for natural
river change?
Protect and
improve
the
quality
of land
and
soil
and
ensure
that land
and
soil
is
used
in
a
sustainable
and
innovative
manner
Protect and
improve
the
quality
of land
and
soil
and
ensure
it is
used
in a
sustainable
manner;
promote
sustainable
waste
and
mineral management
Waste
and
minerals
issues have
been
incorporated
into
this
objective
since
most planning
issues related
to
86
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Previous
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
New
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
Reasons
for Change
(NB. Multiple
objectives
have
been
rephrased
in th
e interests
of clarity, and
criteria
rephrased
in th
e interests
of
measurability.)
Does it
reduce
contaminated
sites and
increase
remediation?
Will
it m
inimise
the
loss of land
(and
soils) to
developmentespecially
Grade
1, 2
and
3
agricultural land?.
Will
it prioritise
development on
previously
developed
land?
Will
it reduce
contaminated
sites and
increase
remediation?
Will
it m
inimise
the
loss of land
(and
soils) to
developmentespecially
Grade
1, 2
and
3 agricultural land?.
Will
it prioritise
development on
previously
developed
land?
Will
it result in
the
effective
sterilisation
of any m
ineral resource?
Will
it encourage
resource
recovery?
those
matters
are
already dealt with
through
the
Tees Valley Minerals
and
Waste
DPDs so
do
not require
a
separate
objective
in this
appraisal
Avoid
and
reduce
flood
risk
Does it
follow
the
sequential approach
to
avoiding
higher flood
risk areas?
Will
it include/encourage
integrated
drainage
and
rainwater harvesting?
Will
it reduce
the
risk and
impact of flooding
on
development sites and
elsewhere?
Will
it allow
for flood
management m
easures?
Avoid
and
reduce
flood
risk
Does it
follow
the
sequential approach
to
avoiding
higher flood
risk
areas?
Will
it include/encourage
integrated
drainage
and
rainwater harvesting?
Will
it reduce
the
risk and
impact of flooding
on
development sites and
elsewhere?
Will
it allow
for flood
management m
easures?
Protect and
enhance
ground
and
surface
water quality
and
make
efficient use
of water
Will
it reduce
the
risk of contamination
to ground
waters?
Will
it encourage
the
use
of SUDS?
Will
it contribute
to
improving
water quality?
Protect and
enhance
air
and
water quality
and
make
efficient use
of water
Will
it contribute
to
reductions in
air
quality monitoring
pollutants
at
monitoring
locations across the
Borough?
Will
it reduce
the
risk of contamination
to ground
waters?
Will
it increase
the
use
of SUDS?
Air
quality now
added
to
this
criterion.
87
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Previous
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
New
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
Reasons
for Change
(NB. Multiple
objectives
have
been
rephrased
in th
e interests
of clarity, and
criteria
rephrased
in th
e interests
of
measurability.)
Does it
reduce
the
demand
for water?
Will
it contribute
to
improving
water quality?
Does it
reduce
the
demand
for water?
Maintain
protect and
improve
air
quality
Will
it contribute
to
reductions in
air
quality
monitoring
pollutants
at m
onitoring
locations
across the
Borough?
Objective
removed
Air
qualitynot currently a
major
problem
in the
boroughhas now
been
added
to
the
water quality
criterion
in the
interests
of
streamlining
the
framework.
Protect and
enhance
biodiversity
and
geodiversity
and
encourage
opportunities
for
habitat creation
Will
it m
aintain
and
enhance
range
and
population
of key species?
Will
it protect a
nd
enhance
ecological networks,
habitat corridors
and
linking
routes?
Does it
continue
the
protection
for national and
locally
designated
biodiversity and
geodiversity
sites and
propose
appropriate
enhancement?
Will
it ensure
the
conservation, e
nhancement
and
creation
of BAP
priority
habitats
within
the
Borough?
Will
it im
prove
understanding
of the
importance
of biodiversity and
geodiversity?
Protect and
enhance
biodiversity
and
geodiversity
Will
it m
aintain
and
enhance
range
and
population
of key species?
Will
it protect a
nd
enhance
ecological networks, habitat corridors
and
linking
routes?
Does it
continue
the
protection
for national and
locally
designated
biodiversity and
geodiversity sites and
propose
appropriate
enhancement?
Will
it ensure
the
conservation, e
nhancement and
creation
of BAP
priority
habitats
within
the
Borough?
Will
it im
prove
understanding
of the
importance
of biodiversity and
geodiversity?
Protect,
and
enhance
access
to, open
spaces, the
rights
of way
network
and
the
green
Protect,
and
enhance
access
to, green
infrastructure
and
the
rights
of way
network
88
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Previous
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
New
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
Reasons
for Change
(NB. Multiple
objectives
have
been
rephrased
in th
e interests
of clarity, and
criteria
rephrased
in th
e interests
of
measurability.)
infrastructure
network
Will
it protect e
xisting
green
infrastructure
or
open
spaces?
Will
it enhance/create
good
quality and
accessible
green
infrastructure
or open
spaces?
Will
it promote
increased
access to
and
use
of
rights
of way and
green
infrastructure, where
appropriate?
Will
it protect e
xisting
green
infrastructure
or open
spaces?
Will
it enhance/create
good
quality and
accessible
green
infrastructure
or open
spaces?
Will
it promote
increased
access to
and
use
of rights
of way and
green
infrastructure, where
appropriate?
Promote
sustainable
waste
and
mineral
management,
including
reduction, reuse,
recycling
and
recovery
of waste
and
mineral
resources
Will
it result in
the
effective
sterilisation
of any
mineral resource?
Will
it encourage
resource
recovery?
Objective
removed
Waste
and
minerals
issues
incorporated
removed
to the
‘Land
and
soils’ objective
since
most
planning
issues related
to
them
are
already dealt with
through
the
Tees
Valley M
inerals
and
Waste
DPDs so
do
not require
a separate
objective
in
this
appraisal.
Promote
traffic
reduction
and
encourage
more
sustainable
alternative
forms
of
transport?
Will
it reduce
the
distance
people
need
to
travel
to work
or to
access services and
facilities and
will
it prioritise
development on
well located
sites, especially
the
town
centre?
Will
it encourage
the
use
of alternatives to
car
travel, including
by protecting
and
improving
walking/cycling
routes and
public
transport
Promote
traffic
reduction
and
encourage
the
use
of public
and
nonmotor transport
Will
it reduce
the
distance
people
need
to
travel to
work
or to
access
services and
facilities and
will
it prioritise
development on
well located
sites, especially
the
town
centre?
Will
it encourage
the
use
of alternatives to
car travel, including
by
protecting
and
improving
walking/cycling
routes and
public
transport
routes?
89
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Previous
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
New
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
Reasons
for Change
(NB. Multiple
objectives
have
been
rephrased
in th
e interests
of clarity, and
criteria
rephrased
in th
e interests
of
measurability.)
routes?
Preserve
and
enhance
Darlington’s
distinctive
and
valuable
historic
environment,
landscape
character and
settlements
and
increase
engagement in
cultural activities.
Will
it conserve
designated
and
nondesignated
heritage
assets
and
other elements
of the
historic environment?
Will
it protect a
nd
enhance
the
quality and
character of the
landscape, including
by
promoting
good
design?
Will
it promote
the
maintenance, sensitive
adaptation
and
reuse
of buildings?
Will
it promote
and
increase
understanding
of
Darlington’s
heritage, especially
railw
ay
heritage?
Will
it protect,
and
help
the
expansion
of,
arts
and
culture
facilities?
Conserve
Darlington’s
distinctive
and
valuable
historic
environment,
heritage
assets, landscape
character and
settlements.
Will
it conserve
designated
and
nondesignated
heritage
assets
and
other elements
of the
historic environment?
Will
it protect a
nd
enhance
the
quality and
character of the
landscape,
including
by promoting
good
design?
Will
it promote
the
maintenance, sensitive
adaptation
and
reuse
of
buildings and
historic assets, using
them
as a
catalyst for regeneration
and
a stimulus to
good
design?
Will
it promote
and
increase
understanding
of Darlington’s
heritage,
especially
railw
ay heritage?
Will
it m
aintain
separation
between
the
main
settlements
in th
e
Borough
and
those
in surrounding
districts?
New
‘separation’ criterion
reflects
adopted
Core
Strategy.
‘Maintenance’ criterion
expanded
to
include
relevant m
aterial from
the
Eastern
Town
Centre
Fringe
AAP
SA
framework
Cultural/arts criterion
moved
to
Objective
3.
To
achieve
ambitious, sustainable
levels
of
economic
growth
Does it
provide
for opportunities to
attract n
ew
business to
the
borough?
Will
it facilitate
the
expansion
and
development
of existing
businesses, especially
in th
e field
of
Achieve
ambitious, sustainable
levels
of economic
growth
Does it
provide
for opportunities to
attract n
ew
business to
the
borough?
Will
it facilitate
the
expansion
and
development of existing
businesses?
Will
it support
the
primacy of the
town
centre?
Multiple
priority
business sectors
have
been
identified, no
longer
suitable
to
focus solely
on
renewable
energy.
Need
to
support
business start
ups
identified
in several strategies and
90
Darlington
Local P
lan
– M
aking
and
Growing
Places DPD
SA
Scoping
Report
Appendices, O
ctober 2012
Previous
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
New
SA
Objective
& subobjectives
Reasons
for Change
(NB. Multiple
objectives
have
been
rephrased
in th
e interests
of clarity, and
criteria
rephrased
in th
e interests
of
measurability.)
renewable
energy?
Will
it support
the
primacy of the
town
centre?
Will
it support
business startups and
ensure
the
availability
of space
for them?
supported
by the
statistics for
business births and
deaths.
Increase
employment levels
and
access
to
sustainable
and
high
quality
employment
opportunities?
Will
it help
generate
net n
ew
jobs?
Will
it support
the
creation
of sustainable
transport
links to
employment areas, especially
from
areas of high
unemployment?
Increase
employment levels
and
access
to
sustainable
and
high
quality
employment opportunities?
Will
it help
generate
net n
ew
jobs?
Will
it support
the
creation
of sustainable
transport
links to
employment
areas, especially
from
areas of high
unemployment?
91